Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 29 May 2001

Vol. 537 No. 2

Written Answers. - Architectural Heritage.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

53 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Arts, Heritage Gaeltacht and the Islands the plans she has to protect various houses or buildings of cultural, architectural or historical significance or importance which though preserved, may be in danger due to lack of maintenance or protection from the elements; if her attention has been drawn to the fact that such buildings can be in either public or private ownership; her plans to deal with this issue; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [15787/01]

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

329 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Arts, Heritage Gaeltacht and the Islands if her Department has compiled a list of historical buildings or sites which may be at risk either from development or the elements; the action she proposes in order to safeguard such locations; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [16046/01]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 53 and 329 together.

The Deputy is aware, no doubt, that last November I announced a major investment of over £100 million in the built heritage under the national development plan, including an unprecedented commitment to the continued conservation and protection, in the period up to 2006, of the sizeable portfolio of over 740 national monuments and historic properties in the care of Dúchas, the heritage service of my Department. Having conducted a detailed review of the properties under my control I have identified in excess of 100 sites, which will require major work from either a conservation, protection or presentation point of view, to be funded during the period of the plan.

In general, my Department does not directly provide financial support for the restoration of buildings in private ownership. However, the Deputy may also be aware that the Heritage Council, which is an independent statutory body established under the Heritage Act, 1995, and funded by my Department, operates a buildings at risk register for heritage buildings of architectural significance. The register informs the administration by the Heritage Council of its architectural grant scheme where buildings in need of essential repairs are grant-aided. I understand that the council is making available £1.5 million under this scheme in 2001. Details of the grants provided by the Heritage Council under this scheme are contained in its annual report.

In addition, the Deputy will be aware that in May of 1998, together with my colleague, the Minister for the Environment and Local Government, I launched the package of proposals for strengthening the protection of the architectural heritage. That package, which is being implemented by both Departments, adopts a comprehensive approach to the protection of our architectural heritage in its many and varied forms, rather than singling out individual aspects of that heritage. As part of the package, the Minister for the Environment and Local Government launched, in 1999, a grant scheme for the conservation of protected structures, which is being administered by local authorities with funding in the order of £4 million per annum. All inquiries relating to this scheme should be directed to the relevant local authority.

A number of legislative provisions also contribute to the protection of the architectural heritage. These include section 482 of the Taxes Consolidation Act, 1997, which allows tax relief in respect of expenditure incurred in the repair, maintenance or restoration of approved buildings; the Architectural Heritage (National Inventory) and Historic Monuments (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1999, under which a nationwide survey is being carried out by my Department to help identify structures and buildings which are of architectural, historical, archaeological, artistic, cultural, scientific, social or technical interest; and the Local Government (Planning and Development) Act, 1999, which places a duty of care on the owners of protected structures and also gives planning authorities enhanced powers, not only to deal with development proposals affecting them, but also to safeguard their future.
Top
Share