Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 20 Jun 2001

Vol. 538 No. 4

Written Answers. - Architectural Heritage.

John McGuinness

Question:

105 Mr. McGuinness asked the Minister for Arts, Heritage Gaeltacht and the Islands if it is usual practice to re-employ retired employees of Dúchas as consultants; if such an arrangement exists at the Main Guard, Clonmel; if so, if fees and travel and subsistence allowances were included in the reply to Parliamentary Question No. 139 of 10 May 2001; the category in which they were included; the reason consultants are employed on a long-term basis; and if this indicates a deficit of qualified people within Duchas. [18224/01]

I can confirm that a retired employee of Dúchas is engaged as a consultant clerk of works on the conservation of the Main Guard, Clonmel and that details of this commission were included in my reply to Parliamentary Question No. 139 of 10 May 2001 under the category of Clerk of Works (conservation).

It is quite normal practice to engage clerks of works on large-scale projects. In the case of the Main Guard, it was necessary to engage a clerk of works with a background and experience in conservation of historic structures. It is difficult to procure such clerk of works services as there is little demand for them outside of State-sponsored conservation projects. The retired employee of Dúchas in question was the only such suitable clerk of works known at the time and he was duly commissioned for the project.

Consultants' services are otherwise normally commissioned from the wider private sector. Consultants' services are commissioned on an WP extended char 4,29as needed' basis in keeping with Government practice and where it is clear that it is more economical to commission consultants for relevant once-off projects, irrespective of duration, rather than recruit permanent staff.

John McGuinness

Question:

106 Mr. McGuinness asked the Minister for Arts, Heritage Gaeltacht and the Islands if she will investigate the reason the fire alarm in Tintern Abbey, County Wexford has not been repaired; her views on whether the installation of the alarm indicated a need; if the situation can be immediately rectified; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [18225/01]

A private firm maintains the fire alarm system at Tintern Abbey. An order was placed several months ago to have the system repaired. I understand that due to staffing problems within the firm, the repair was not carried out. I thank the Deputy for bringing the matter to my attention and I have requested that the matter be expedited and have been assured that it will be treated as a priority.

Top
Share