Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 20 Nov 2001

Vol. 544 No. 3

Written Answers. - Animal Medicines.

Ivan Yates

Question:

248 Mr. Yates asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and Rural Development the position of the Government and his Department regarding article 67B of the EU regulations relating to prescription only animal medicines; his views on the representations to maintain the existing responsible supply chain where appropriate in order that previous acceptable practices for routine products such as worm doses, vaccines and basic antiseptics can continue without the requirement of a prescription; and if his Department has carried out an assessment of the effect such a regulation may have in terms of additional costs on farmers and the potential resultant usage of such basic products. [29038/01]

The specific proposal referred to forms one part of a package of proposals brought forward by the European Commission in July of this year in the context of a major reform of the EU legislation regulating both the human and veterinary medicines fields. This package of proposals falls to be dealt with under the co-decision procedure involving both the European Parliament and the European Council. As such, best estimates indicate that it will be at least two years before final decisions on the Commission's proposals will be taken by parliament and the council.

The Commission's proposals have not yet been discussed in detail. My initial approach to such discussions will be to obtain clarification from the Commission on its proposal to make all medicines for food-producing animals subject to veterinary prescription, given that currently there is an absence of harmonization at EU level as regards the operation of prescription regimes. I might add that Ireland has already, prior to the emergence of these proposals, asked the Commission to address the harmonization issue in order to improve regulation of the EU veterinary medicines market. Among the key issues yet to be clarified are the principles which would govern prescribing activity and supply of medicines by veterinarians, the dispensing of prescriptions and also the specific range of products which would come within the scope of the prescription requirement. In the absence of such details, it is not possible to carry out a meaningful assessment of the potential effect of the Commission's proposals on the Irish regime which, I am glad to acknowledge, has by and large been working satisfactorily.

At this early stage in the EU decision-making process, it would not be appropriate for me to take an absolute position on one aspect of the Commission's package of proposals affecting the veterinary sector. Without prejudice to the position which I may adopt on the various detailed elements, I can empathise with the overall stated objectives of the European Commission, which are fundamentally about enhancing the protection of European consumers and which also fully recognize the importance in this context of ensuring the availability of veterinary treatments. I will approach the discussions with a view to ensuring that the EU legislative framework resulting from the reform meets these objectives. In this regard, the views of all stakeholders will be fully taken into account.
Top
Share