To counteract the justified criticism levelled against the extraordinary indemnity deal given to the religious congregations – within whose ranks, let us remember, were numbered the perpetrators of gross abuse – the Taoiseach and other Ministers have repeated time and time again that their primary concern is for the victims of such abuse. One in Four has been one of the most successful groups assisting victims of sexual abuse.
The One in Four organisation, thanks to Government ineptitude and possibly worse, is currently on the point of collapse. There can be no dispute about the bona fides of both the organisation and its director, Colm O'Gorman. It is run by and for people who have experienced sexual abuse and provides a truly independent counselling service. It provides individual therapy, group therapy, advocacy and support, open evenings, help-line support and on-line message boards. Indirectly it provides support through campaigning, policy making, in-house research training and consultancy work.
Its establishment in Ireland was encouraged, promoted and supported by the Government. One in Four set out in detail its proposed brief. From the beginning it set out its therapeutic role as being central to its work. Officials of the Department of Health and Children did not dispute this. After a meeting on 25 March 2003 with these officials, One in Four spelt out clearly the nature of its work and the nature of the agreement made with the Department in a detailed letter that was sent to the Department on 27 March and copied to the Department of the Taoiseach. The officials had sought an estimate of the costs of the counselling service. In August, One in Four supplied that information and within a week followed up with a breakdown of figures. From the letter dated 27 March until 15 September the Department did not, apparently, dispute the issue of counselling. However, the Taoiseach today claims that this information was not forthcoming. Today the Taoiseach stated that €208,000 was made available to the British-based operation. My understanding is that only €60,000 of that money was allocated to the British operation.
Despite pleas from One in Four, the officials never signed a service agreement with them. In August, One in Four asked the Department's officials to meet it representatives. The organisation did not receive a reply to that request. It is clear from the documentation that the One in Four organisation kept the Department fully informed yet at no time until 15 September did the Department make clear any problem with its counselling role.
This confusion raises serious questions about the professionalism and competence of the Department of Health and Children in dealing with an important service provider, the development of which it had encouraged. It is worth noting that the Finlay report recommended that it was not appropriate for counselling to be provided by the State but that an independent body was required. This principle is surely as valid in the area of sexual abuse. The Government has managed to spend €17 million on counselling since 1999, while the religious congregations claim to have spent €10 million on counselling services. The only truly independent counselling service of these three is due to collapse because €81,000 cannot be found and the budget which was promised for next year is now in jeopardy. There is no doubt that this is a desperately needed service. As one abuse victim said: "I saw One in Four reach out where others had failed, giving us the necessary support to keep alive."
I urge the Minister of State to make a clear statement of support tonight for the work of One in Four and of his commitment to ensuring that these matters can be resolved and that the future of this organisation can be secured.