Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 6 Jul 2006

Vol. 623 No. 3

Adjournment Debate.

Farm Waste Management.

I welcome the Minister of State to the House. I call on the Minister for Agriculture and Food to update the costings to 2006 levels in determining the grant level under the new farm waste management scheme. In raising this matter I am very conscious of the Government's commitment to agriculture and the excellent work being done by the Minister for Agriculture and Food, Deputy Coughlan. I compliment her on her attention to her portfolio. That contribution is recognised by farm leaders and others throughout the country. It is obvious that her negotiating skills and interaction with her opposite numbers at the Council of Ministers and in the Commission are bearing fruit in the best interests of Irish agriculture.

The Government brought forward a new farm pollution grant scheme, which was cleared by the European Commission. That was necessary in the context of the need to put in place a nitrates directive and give farmers an opportunity to meet future stringent regulations regarding farmyard pollution. That is an excellent scheme, with a 60% grant available. I raise this matter because the scheme's grants are based on 2004 costings. I call on the Minister and the Government to update those to 2006 levels. Numerous representations have been made to me by individual farmers and the farm organisations outlining the major gap showing between the grant and the tender prices being received by farmers. In some cases the grant is being reduced to 50%, and I am aware that in some cases it was lowered to 40% and 45%.

I am conscious that contractors and those in the construction industry generally have an enormous amount of work available to them. For that reason they can price different projects at a very high level. That may be reflected in some cases in the estimated tender prices farmers are getting but, irrespective of that, we must update the way the grant is calculated. The calculation at 2004 levels does not reflect the cost to the individual farmer today or the 60% grant this Government has agreed with the European Commission and the farm bodies to put in place these important measures.

I am aware this issue has been discussed in the social partnership talks. I do not know how far it has gone or whether it can be finalised but I want to add to the debate the concerns of farmers in Roscommon-South Leitrim and the farm organisations in that area with whom I have an excellent working relationship. My raising of this matter should not be viewed in any way as a criticism of the scheme or the excellent work being done by the Minister but it is important that farmers are in a position to take up this scheme. I believe they will take it up if we upgrade the costings to 2006 levels. I make that request to the Minister and her Department.

I thank Deputy Finneran for raising this important issue and making such a positive contribution. I am pleased to have this opportunity to clarify the current position regarding the updating of the Department's standard costings for the purposes of grant payments under the new farm waste management scheme. Deputy Finneran has been in constant contact with the Minister, Deputy Coughlan, and myself on this important matter.

The new scheme was launched by the Department last March to assist farmers to meet the additional requirements of the nitrates directive. The amendments to the scheme included, in particular, an increase in the standard grant rate from the previous 40% to 60%, with 70% being available in the four zone C counties, namely, Cavan, Donegal, Leitrim and Monaghan. I am particularly pleased that the new scheme recognises the special issues arising for farmers in the zone C region as far as compliance with the new nitrates directive provisions is concerned. The new scheme also provides for an increase in the maximum eligible investment ceiling from €75,000 to €120,000 and removes any minimum income requirements from farming from the scheme, so that all small farmers can participate. This latter change was particularly welcomed by me.

As the current European Union rural development round closes at the end of this year, applications under the scheme must be received by the end of 2006. For this reason, the Department of Agriculture and Food has also agreed to accept applications under the new scheme as soon as application has been made to the relevant local authority for any required planning permission. This administrative change will ensure that all farmers wishing to avail of the revised scheme will be in a position to submit applications by the end of year deadline.

The financial commitment of this Government to the scheme is substantial. A sum of €43 million has been made available for the scheme in this year's Estimates and up to €250 million has been ear-marked for the scheme over its projected three year period of operation as farmers generally have until the end of December 2008 to comply with this particular element of the new nitrates regulations.

There has been huge interest by Irish farmers in the new scheme since its launch. Over 4,600 applications were received from farmers during the second quarter of 2006, that is, a three month period, compared with just over 3,000 under the preceding version of the scheme during the full calendar year of 2005. These figures, as Deputy Finneran mentioned, confirm that farmers have found the new scheme particularly attractive and that the scheme will have a vital role in ensuring that the required infrastructure is in place on Irish farms to ensure compliance with the nitrates directive by the relevant European Union deadlines.

As far as the standard costings are concerned, my Government colleague, the Minister for Agriculture and Food, Deputy Coughlan, indicated, when launching the revised scheme last March, that the costings used to determine the level of grant payments under the scheme were under review at that time. The revised costings will therefore be introduced by the Department as soon as this review is completed. The Minister, Deputy Coughlan, has already given a commitment that the revised costings, when introduced, will be applied to all approvals issued under the scheme since 1 January 2006. Accordingly, farmers can be assured that developments in relation to the cost of materials or labour used in the construction of farm buildings will be taken into account when the grants come to be paid to them under the revised scheme. For reasons of confidentiality, the individual costings have never been made available by the Department to farmers or their advisers.

I assure Deputy Finneran that I am confident that the Minister will be in a position to announce the introduction of the revised costings in the very near future. I thank Deputy Finneran for giving me the opportunity to clarify the current position on what is a matter of great importance to farming.

Schools Building Projects.

At the heart of the matter in Scoil Ruain, Killenaule, is the frustration being experienced by students, by teachers and by parents. It is the frustration of waiting 20 years for a facility to which they are entitled. The school management is looking for a basic sports facility, a sports hall. Despite many promises, nothing has happened. It is the second term of office of the Government parties and the school authorities, parents and students are still waiting. The school moved into a new building approximately 20 years ago, without a sports hall or an assembly area. To date, this oversight has not been corrected.

It is important to note that the school is widely known as one where students and school management work in a spirit of co-operation. The management and staff of the school are very proud of their students and are assured that they can take their students on any trip, foreign or otherwise, in the full knowledge that they will not cause trouble or misbehave. In view of the difficulties associated with discipline and behaviour at post primary level this is a testament to the commitment and respect ingrained in the school's culture.

The tremendous support from the loyal parents who continue to send their children to the school, despite the fact that there are no indoor sports facilities, must be acknowledged. Parents have such faith in the school and the ability of the teachers and management that the school is seeing the second and third generation of students from many families. This demonstrates the level of belief which the parents and local community have in the school in Killenaule.

On behalf of the school authorities I extend an invitation to the Minister for Education and Science, Deputy Hanafin, to visit the school. The management has expressed the view to me that it would like her to visit during an assembly time. At present, there is an assembly area in the middle of the school that is used for guest speakers, open evenings, parents' night, graduation Masses and other events. Many of the classrooms open on to this assembly area. As one can imagine, this becomes a chaotic scene when the bell chimes and classes pour into an already occupied assembly area. The level of disruption, interruption and pandemonium is unimaginable and inexcusable. Daily routine in Scoil Ruain is difficult for everyone, yet staff and students continue with the daily grind in the hope that one day the promises of the Government might be realised.

Scoil Ruain is in a disadvantaged area. It is acknowledged that if the school were in a city, facilities and resources would be made available. This is a rural school in Tipperary which feels it is invisible and considered to be off the map as far as resources from the Government is concerned. In effect, the sporting and assembly needs of the school have been ditched and ignored by the Government.

The school caters for approximately 400 students. All sporting activities take place outdoors regardless of the weather. The students of Scoil Ruain are at a complete disadvantage by comparison with students who have easy access to indoor facilities. On several occasions during the year, students need to travel to use the facilities of other schools. They need to borrow or rent these facilities. On wet and rainy days, there is no physical education, no exercise and no fitness programme in the school. How does this unacceptable omission square with the Minister's health and fitness programme to combat obesity and diabetes?

If the Government is serious about combating these problems, adequate sporting and assembly facilities must be provided for schools such as Scoil Ruain. Considering the immense financial resources available to the Minister and the unspent funds at her disposal, how can she justify the exclusion of this school from the building programme? I urge the Minister in the strongest possible terms to sanction immediately the necessary funding for the sports hall in Scoil Ruain, Killenaule.

I apologise for the absence of the Minister for Education and Science, Deputy Hanafin, who is unavoidably absent owing to other commitments. I thank the Deputy for raising the matter of the application for capital funding for Scoil Ruain, Killenaule, County Tipperary. I am happy to be able to outline to him where the project stands in the context of the huge amount of capital works being undertaken by the Department of Education and Science under the schools building and modernisation programme.

Modernising facilities in our 3,200 primary and 750 post-primary schools is not an easy task, given the legacy of decades of under-investment in this area as well as the need to respond to emerging needs in areas of rapid population growth. Nonetheless, since taking office, the Government has shown a sincere determination to improve the condition of our school buildings and to ensure that the appropriate facilities are in place to enable the implementation of a broad and balanced curriculum.

The Government has invested in the largest school building programme in the history of the State. Between 1998 and the end of 2004, almost €2 billion was invested in school buildings and in the region of 7,500 large and small projects were completed in schools, including 130 brand new schools and 510 large-scale refurbishments and extensions. Funding for school building and renovation projects has increased fivefold since 1997. In 2006, €491 million will be spent on school building projects, compared with just €92 million in 1997. The 2006 allocation is, in its own right, an increase of more than 9% in real terms on the 2005 allocation.

As the Deputy will be aware, at the end of last year the Department of Education and Science outlined its spending plans for primary and post-primary schools for 2006. With €491 million to be spent on school buildings, there will be over 1,300 projects active in schools all over the country. This significant investment will allow the Department to continue to progress its major programme of school building and modernisation which includes improving equipment needed for new technologies and ICT.

The school in question applied to the Department of Education and Science for capital funding for the development of a PE hall. The Department fully recognises the crucial role of physical exercise within the school environment and it is committed to funding the provision of PE, general purpose and outdoor play areas in schools as part of the schools' capital investment programme. As with any application for capital funding, applications for the provision of PE or sports facilities in existing schools must be considered in the context of all other applications on hand for capital investment, such as applications for new schools, refurbishment projects, extensions, new sites, remediation programmes and so on. This is done in the context of available resources and the published criteria for prioritising school building projects.

I will briefly explain and summarise these criteria which show the self-evident logic of how projects are selected for inclusion in a school building programme. There are four band ratings under the criteria, with band 1 being the highest and band 4 the lowest in terms of priorities. Band 1 consists of projects for new schools and extensions to schools in rapidly developing areas, accommodation for special needs students, projects for schools that are structurally unsound and rationalisation projects. Band 2 projects range from major extensions to address mainstream accommodation deficits and extensive to moderate refurbishments to existing schools to maintain the integrity of buildings. Band 3 projects deal with the provision of ancillary accommodation and improvement works for other than special education accommodation. Band 4 includes all other project types, for example PE halls, general purpose rooms, etc.

Not alone are these criteria open and transparent but they were revised in recent times following consultation with the education partners to ensure that they are tuned to meet the many challenges presenting for the school building programme. These include the needs of rapidly developing areas where little or no accommodation exists, the accommodation requirements for the massive expansion in teacher numbers, the need to cater for both diversity and our special needs pupils, not to mention tackling the historical under investment in our existing school building stock.

The PE hall project for the school in question been assigned a band 4 rating under the prioritisation criteria. Over the past five years, however, enrolments have fallen at the school by 15%. The Department of Education and Science is revisiting the school's application for the purposes of drawing up long-term projected enrolment. While this will not have the effect of changing the band rating for the PE hall project, it will ensure that the project is properly assessed for inclusion in the school building and modernisation programme at the appropriate time.

Remedial Works Grants.

I thank the Ceann Comhairle for agreeing to an impromptu meeting with a delegation last week. I want to discuss the remedial works scheme at Mullaghmatt estate in Monaghan town. There are 170 houses on the estate, half of which are in private ownership and the remainder in council ownership. The estate, which is more than 40 years old, is beginning to show its age and needs a face lift. The remedial works scheme will help to regenerate the estate in that regard.

A pilot scheme being operated in the estate is nothing short of excellent and people are pleased with the work being done by the contractors. However, an estate committee, which is working towards rebuilding the estate, wants to play a part in the planning process but feels it is being left out of the loop. Much would be gained by giving the committee some form of ownership of the project. The council has passed the contract to the National Building Agency but people on the estate also have ideas for the project.

Funding is available, to a maximum of 50%, for replacing windows and other refurbishments but private owners will have to pay upwards of €3,000. Many people would consider that small money but it is a significant expense to many people on the estate. Approximately 70% of the owners whose houses need refurbishment will not apply for funding because they cannot afford the repayments. The people who can afford to pay for refurbishments have already done so. Full use should be made of these funds because it would defeat the purpose if only two out of ten houses in a row installed new windows. People do not desire a patchwork arrangement of that nature.

The committee is concerned that some of the money assigned for refurbishments will be returned unused and is investigating whether soft loans could made available. Some of the people concerned are unemployed and unable to take up this generous offer. The committee has ideas on progressing the project and is seeking a meeting with the NBA.

The estate is improving and investors are starting to buy houses in it, which sends out the right type of signal. A visit to the estate would be worthwhile in order to see the work already completed in part one of the project. I urge the Minister of State to allow the committee to become part of the decision-making process.

I acknowledge the Deputy's interest in raising this matter, which was also raised with me by the Minister of State, Deputy Brendan Smith. The Mullaghmatt housing estate in Monaghan town has been designated for funding under my Department's remedial works scheme. I am strongly committed to regeneration and remedial works programmes. The first phase of the Mullmaghmatt redevelopment, which is currently under way, involves the refurbishment of 25 rented houses and some works to six tenant purchased houses at an estimated cost of over €2 million.

The extensive refurbishment of the rented houses includes the provision of new windows and doors, installation of central heating and associated insulation and rewiring. Effectively, these houses will be brought up to modern standards. I understand work is well advanced on the project and this phase will be complete by the end of August.

It is normal practice in refurbishment schemes of this size that a pilot or an initial phase is undertaken to test the efficacy of the works proposed. A report is then prepared by the local authority for its own assessment and for subsequent submission to my Department for consideration with regard to progression to further phases. Monaghan Town Council will shortly prepare an evaluation report on the first phase of the regeneration of Mullaghmatt in conjunction with the National Building Agency, which is the council's consultant on the project. The evaluation report will cover a number of issues, including whether the works carried out have adequately addressed the problems presented in the estate and identify the implications for the remaining phases. The cost effectiveness of the refurbishment works undertaken will also be subject to critical evaluation.

The extent of tenant satisfaction associated with improvements in the management of the estate will be an important feature of how the overall project will advance. The timeline for the implementation of further phases of remedial works to remaining houses in the estate is a matter to be determined by the town council in conjunction with my Department in light of the outcome of the initial phase of implementation.

I would like to address an issue that has been raised by the Deputy and others in respect of work on tenant purchased private houses in the estate. It is a condition of the remedial works scheme that tenant purchasers of houses in a remedial works project may be included in a project where it is considered by the local authority that the undertaking of external works to these dwellings is necessary to avoid an unacceptable or incongruous result to the refurbishment of the estate as a whole. Eligible work to tenant purchased houses is confined to the exterior elevation of the houses and would typically include the provision of new windows and doors, replacement of facias and soffits and new boundary walls.

Tenant purchasers are required under the scheme to contribute 50% of the cost of eligible works to their houses. There are no proposals to alter the terms of the scheme with regard to contributions from tenant purchasers. The Deputy will recognise that these are now privately owned houses. It is a matter for the town council at local level to secure the participation of any private householders on the basis that they make a 50% contribution to improvement works to the front of their houses. I hope the Deputy will acknowledge this is a generous contribution to the rejuvenation of privately owned houses.

I assure the Deputy that I support the regeneration of this particular estate. However, an evaluation of the first phase is necessary in order to ensure that the refurbishment work properly addresses the various problems in the estate before proceeding to the next phase of redevelopment. I will ask the National Building Agency and the town council to report to my Department on their experience of the first phase and their proposals for the further redevelopment of the estate. I assure the Deputy that my Department has supported the redevelopment of this estate.

Social and Affordable Housing.

Late last year I raised the housing issue in my constituency with the Minister of State at the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Deputy Noel Ahern and his brother and colleague, the Taoiseach. I stated that both should hang their heads in shame at the publication of the Dublin north central area B, Malahide and Howth housing district statistics. While a large number of families are awaiting housing on Dublin's northside, few houses have been provided under the social and affordable housing programme. The Minister of State appeared rather put out by my comments but the fact is that those figures are a shocking indictment of this Government's record on housing. These figures were revealed at a time of record housing production, some 80,000 housing units were completed last year and 77,000 in 2004. More than 20,000 units were built in my constituency.

I represent many constituents who have been on the housing lists for more than ten years with no hope of accommodation in the last year of the Fianna Fáil-Progressive Democrats Government. The housing list figures released to my colleague Councillor Anne Carter at the end of last year showed that almost 3,000 families were on the social and affordable housing lists for the north central area alone, including the Donaghmede, Artane and Clontarf city council wards. This is approximately 5% of housing applicants in Ireland. There are 1,569 families and individuals on the housing list, including 229 families on the priority list. The number of north central households on the housing transfer list was 871. There were an additional 124 families and individuals on the area B homeless list. The number of applicants for the city council area B affordable housing list is now considerably more than 400. The number of city council housing vacancies for area B is derisory by comparison. In 2003 only 157 vacancies became available for letting and there were only 116 vacancies for households on the transfer list. In 2004 and 2005 available vacancies decreased. This year, the Department has provided funding for only 100 older homes for tenants.

It is extraordinary that thousands of families remain on the housing lists of Dublin North-East and other similar regions when nearly 250,000 houses and apartments have been built since mid-2003. The Taoiseach, the Minister of State, Deputy Noel Ahern, outgoing city manager, John Fitzgerald, and outgoing county manager, John Tierney, who is the incoming city manager, have failed lamentably in a key objective of any reasonably caring Government, namely the provision of a home for every family and citizen.

All housing policy seems to be directed at facilitating developers and investors rather than the urgent needs of thousands of ordinary citizens. Fingal County housing manager, Mr. Alan Carthy, seems to be solving the lack of accommodation for social and affordable housing by simply removing longstanding housing applicants from the list. I have encountered at least six such cases in recent months and have referred a number of them to the Office of the Ombudsman.

The personal suffering of many individuals and families on the homeless, housing and affordable lists is evident to public representatives every weekend. The distress of the applicants removed from the list is palpable. Families are distraught as they go from house to house as private rented tenants supported by rent supplements living at the whim of greedy landlords. Mothers, fathers and children trying to exist in hopelessly overcrowded accommodation, often with elderly parents with serious medical conditions, are living anxious lives as the long years on the housing list pass slowly by.

Individual men and women, often in their 40s and 50s, who have become homeless are desperately trying to survive in bed and breakfast accommodation or hostel accommodation. They may, as evidenced by some cases I met last weekend, be living on the streets. This is the legacy of the Government of the third richest country on the planet and its ineffectual, inefficient housing policies.

Last month the Minister of State, Deputy Noel Ahern, announced additional funding of €100 million for social and affordable housing. Nevertheless, it is clear that the Government will miss its modest social housing targets despite the extra funding. Under the National Development Plan 2000-2006 35,000 social and affordable homes were to be completed by the end of this year but on current trends the number of completions will fall well short of this target. My colleague Deputy Gilmore has stated that the Government is spending more money but delivering fewer houses. This is because of the Government's failure to deal with skyrocketing house prices over the past decade.

None of the 10,000 affordable houses to be delivered under the Sustaining Progress agreement has been delivered. Part V of the Planning and Development Act, which came into operation in 2001, should have delivered 30,000 homes by now. Only 2,000 have been delivered due to this Government's collapse in front of its developer friends when it changed the legislation concerning Part V. The target under the National Development Plan 2000-2006 for the voluntary housing sector was 4,000 units but so far the sector has only been permitted to provide 1,400 units a year. More than 44,000 families remain on local authority housing lists and perhaps another 100,000 citizens and their families are completely priced out of the affordable and general housing market. I urge dramatic action on housing, starting in my constituency, which is a microcosm of urban Ireland.

I wish the Leas-Cheann Comhairle and the Minister of State a restful and happy holiday, even though we are not on holiday for most of that time. I wish the same to our valiant staff on another late evening.

I thank the Deputy for his good wishes for the season ahead. Policy issues on the provision of social and affordable housing may be decided at national level but the detailed implementation of those policies and the delivery of projects is a matter for the individual local authorities. It is the responsibility of local authorities to assess the need for housing in particular locations.

In supporting local authorities in their strategies for delivery, this Government has been innovative in its approach to developing policies and ambitious in setting national targets. It ensured strong programmes of social and affordable housing through the provision of substantial resources on a multi-annual basis. In 2006, some €2 billion is provided for investment in social and affordable housing across the country, more than double the expenditure in 2000.

As a result of the investment in recent years and vacancies arising in the social housing stock, the needs of some 100,000 households have been met over the period 1997 to 2005. This includes more than 18,700 households in the Dublin city area and 3,700 households in the Fingal area.

Continued increases in the supply of housing has improved access to housing for first time buyers, which is a Government priority. In the Fingal area the overall growth in housing supply in 2004 was 280% higher than in 1996. Further increased output in north Dublin will arise from developments now under way following the provision of the north fringe sewer. In addition to private units, significant numbers of social and affordable homes will become available through Part V. The establishment of the affordable homes partnership to co-ordinate and add impetus to the delivery of affordable housing in and around the capital is an example of the Government's innovative arrangements to deliver affordable housing.

Building on progress achieved from our investment to date, we announced an increased social and affordable housing programme when launching our new housing policy framework, Building Sustainable Communities, last December. In the draft social partnership agreement, Towards 2016, we have committed to further additional investment in social housing with 27,000 new units to be started or acquired over the period 2007 to 2009. Continued growth is expected in affordable housing, particularly in the Dublin region.

The main strategy for delivery of the Government's social and affordable housing programme is through the five year action plans for social and affordable housing developed by each local authority. The Government made record financial allocations in 2006 to respond to these action plans, with some €150 million made to the two local authorities mentioned for the main local authority social housing programme, traveller accommodation programmes and remedial works excluding major regeneration projects. The action plans are currently at the midway stage and are being reviewed. We must ensure that local authorities are capable of integrated planning and delivery of social and affordable housing. The Government has put in place the policy framework and is making available the necessary resources. Local authorities have a key role in ensuring that action plans are implemented by bringing forward quality projects which respond to local need.

The Government places great emphasis on building sustainable communities. That is the reason it brought forward a policy framework setting down these principles last year. The principles include building good quality housing, having a good tenant mix and investing heavily in good social integration. Fundamentally, it means building homes in communities where people want to live and enjoy living. I urge local councillors to be aware of these issues and of the importance of progressing this agenda in the course of their deliberations in the council chambers.

There are few strategic areas in the city council area available for housing. It was extraordinary that the council sold land that could have been used for social and affordable housing to private interests. That council is in the control of the Labour Party——

The Labour Party does not control the management.

——and a councillor close to the Deputy was to the fore in progressing the sale of that property to a private investor. I remind the Deputy that a councillor who is well known to the Minister of State, Deputy Noel Ahern, was opposed to selling that land to a private investor on the basis that the land should be available for social and affordable housing. Unfortunately, as a result of the Labour Party majority on that council, it was sold to private investors.

It was the Minister's colleagues who approved high density private development on the north fringe.

The Dáil adjourned at 6.30 p.m. until 2.30 p.m. on Wednesday, 27 September 2006.
Top
Share