Skip to main content
Normal View

Seanad Éireann debate -
Thursday, 17 Dec 1970

Vol. 69 No. 3

Committee of Public Accounts of Dáil Éireann (Privileges and Procedure) Bill, 1970: Second Stage.

Question proposed: "That the Bill be now read a Second Time."

I do not think I need say very much about this Bill. Members of the House will be aware af the fact that on 1st December Dáil Éireann remitted to the Committee of Public Accounts of Dáil Éireann the examination of certain expenditure under a grant-in-aid in respect of relief in Northern Ireland. The Committee of Public Accounts of Dáil Éireann met and furnished an interim report in which they set out what they apprehend to be certain difficulties which might arise in regard to privileges and in regard to the attendance of witnesses. They have requested that they be given power to deal with these matters by legislation.

This Bill does precisely what the committee requested and it passed through all Stages in Dáil Éireann this morning. As Senators know, the Committee of Public Accounts is an all-party committee; the interim report requesting this legislation was, I understand, unanimously passed and the Bill was passed in Dáil Éireann without opposition this morning.

I take it that this is essentially a matter for the Dáil. It is dealing with the work of the Dáil Committee of Public Accounts and it does not really affect this House. There are some matters arising on the Bill about which the Minister will probably be able to give me some reassurance. In section 2—this is the section which extends the privilege—there was possibly some doubt as to whether the privilege existed as fully as set out in this section. This section may be regarded as clarifying the position as specifically extending the privilege as set out there.

The only point I want to raise on that is whether the Minister is absolutely clear that the privilege extends to the publishers as well as to the members of the committee. The answer to that is probably that once the thing is privileged the daily newspapers are entitled to publish it just as they are entitled to publish remarks made by either House of the Oireachtas. If that is the position I am quite satisfied and, as I have remarked, it is essentially a matter for the Dáil. If there was more time available, and if the matter was not one of some urgency from the point of view of the Dáil Committee in question, it would be relevant to consider and to discuss if these provisions should not have general application to the proceedings of the committee rather than be limited to a particular inquiry. In any event if the position is that the committee have asked for these powers in relation to this particular inquiry, the question as to whether the powers should be given generally in relation to the work of the committee could be considered at a later date.

I agree with what Senator O'Higgins has said. If the Bill coming before us were wider in scope there could be absolutely no question but that it would have to come to us with due notice and be very thoroughly examined. It may well be that we can accept the point of view that this is a matter of the Dáil regulating the business of its own committees, and being of the opinion that it was necessary to have legislation for the purpose of carrying out this work effectively, they ask for the legislation.

Nevertheless, there are implications, even in a Bill as narrowly drawn as this, for all committees—whether they are committees of the Dáil or of the Seanad. Accordingly, we cannot regard this purely as a matter of the regulation of Dáil business. It is a custom, when legislation is introduced, that the promoting Department circulates the heads of the Bill to other Government Departments and the provisions of the Bill are, in turn, examined by the other Departments before there is final approval and introduction of the Bill into the Oireachtas. If time was available and matters were not urgent, even if the Dáil were initiating legislation in regard to the regulation of its own business and if it were convinced that this had absolutely no effect on the business of the Seanad, this should be referred to Seanad Éireann. It is most unfortunate that this Bill is brought before this House and speedy passage for it is being asked without the Bill having been considered by the Committee of Procedure and Privileges of Seanad Éireann.

There is a real difficulty here. It may well be said that the Bill is narrowly drawn and because of the way in which it is narrowly drawn that it will not affect the committees which are not mentioned. It may be held that it refers only to the particular investigation which Dáil Éireann has asked to be carried out. Nevertheless, the fact that a Bill is introduced in order to put beyond doubt privilege in regard to this committee in this particular piece of work, may well afterwards be held as reinforcing the doubt; it may afterwards be appealed to as a ground that privilege does not exist in other committees of either House of the Oireachtas. Once we take positive action in legislation in regard to this particular instance we are affecting the whole question. Members have been circulated with the Interim Report of the Dáil Committee of Public Accounts and some Members may have been happier than I was about the clarity of the opinions expressed. From reading that report, I certainly could not come to any conclusion but that there was doubt in the minds of at least those reading the opinion.

We must enter a warning note that what is being done in this regard may well have an effect. We have, in Seanad Éireann, a Committee on Statutory Instruments, a Committee which is doing an excellent job of work, year in year out. It may well be that having passed this Bill rapidly, gone home, enjoyed our Christmas, we may suddenly realise that by enacting this particular piece of legislation at the behest of Dáil Éireann and its Committee of Public Accounts, we may have by that very act thrown doubt upon the powers and the privileges of our own Committee on Statutory Instruments.

I would ask the Minister, if we are prepared to give him this Bill here today, will he undertake, having got this Bill for this purpose, to have the whole question of privilege examined? If it is found that the Bill will cast any doubt, or weaken in any way the privilege of any of the other committees, will this matter be brought forward for earnest consideration, and any possible undesirable consequences will be mitigated in this way? I do not think it is necessary to remind the Minister of the possible difficulties in this regard. Both of us served on the Committee on Constitutional and Administrative Procedures, in which the difficulties in regard to this question were discussed. Subsequently, the remarks of the committee on these difficulties were gravely misunderstood among the general public. Perhaps it is necessary to go ahead in this regard. It is certainly necessary to ensure that this sticky area as regards the privileges of our committee should be looked into. If the Minister could assure us that this matter will be thoroughly examined, I for one would be happier in allowing this Bill to pass.

Senator Dooge completely misunderstands, whether deliberately or not, the whole situation in regard to this Bill. There is no question whatever of the situation which he attempted to portray, of the Bill being rushed, giving the illusion that this was another example of rushed legislation. This Bill was not rushed by the Government; it was not asked for by the Government; it was not wanted by the Government. This Bill was asked for by the Committee of Public Accounts of Dáil Éireann which is inquiring into a matter which was demanded by the Opposition in Dáil Éireann. If Senator Dooge wants assurances on this, that or the other thing, that is a matter for the Minister but as far as I am concerned I would say, "Let the Bill stand."

I want reassurance on the privileges of this House.

There is no question of a quid pro quo in regard to this Bill. If the House wants to pass the Bill, let it do so; if it does not, that is all right with me.

Does this Bill refer only to the specific inquiry to which the Minister alluded?

That was a disgraceful suggestion on the part of Senator Dooge.

Is it not true that this was asked for by the Committee of Public Accounts, which are an all-party committee? In the circumstances I think we should pass this legislation.

In regard to the query raised by Senator O'Higgins I should like to say it is my understanding that the position is, as I think he understands it to be, that privilege would also extend to the publishers. It is true to say that this Bill was prepared in a hurry. It is also true that it did not follow the normal procedure followed in regard to Bills through various Government Departments.

The wording of section 1 makes it quite clear that the operation of this Bill is intended to be confined to the Committee of Public Accounts of Dáil Éireann while engaged in the performance of the functions assigned to it by order of Dáil Éireann made on 1st December, 1970, and no further. It was requested by the committee and it was in response to that request that the Bill was brought forward in a hurry.

I should like to make it quite clear that this Bill is not similar to the usual Bills coming through being sponsored by the Government. It is necessary to have it sponsored by the Government in order to comply with the procedure but my attitude and the attitude of the Government in this matter is that we are complying with the request of the Committee of Public Accounts of Dáil Éireann.

If there is any objection to this Bill, we are certainly not pushing it. If it is not unanimously acceptable to this House I shall be happy to withdraw it. I am not in a position, nor would I accept, that I should offer any undertakings to the House in return for the passage of the Bill. I am merely acting as an instrument for the Committee of Public Accounts of Dáil Éireann in bringing the Bill before this House. Therefore, I am not giving any undertakings in return for the passage of the Bill.

The whole question of privilege relating to other committees is a matter that I would not wish to have dealt with in this hurried way. There could be many implications involved and the types of committees that could be affected. All kinds of matters would need close examination before I would contemplate any other legislation in this field.

Therefore, this Bill is confined solely to the matter I have mentioned. I want to repeat the position, so far as I am concerned, that if it is not acceptable to the House I withdraw the Bill. I am not pushing it on the House in any way.

Question put and agreed to.
Agreed to take remaining Stages today.
Top
Share