Skip to main content
Normal View

Seanad Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 27 Jun 1984

Vol. 104 No. 7

Wool Marketing Bill, 1984: Second Stage.

Question proposed: "That the Bill be now read a Second Time."

The main purpose of the Bill is to give legal effect to a decision taken last year to dissolve An Chomhairle Olla. The Bill also provides for the continued implementation by my Department of the statutory functions of the Wool Marketing Act, 1968, involving the registration and licensing of wool buyers' and wool exporters' premises, respectively.

The 1968 Act which provided for the establishment of An Chomhairle Olla came about as a direct result of the recommendations of the Committee on Wool Improvements who reported their findings in 1966.

An Chomhairle's main functions were to advise the Minister for Agriculture in relation to the fixing of grades of wool, apply standards in relation to the registration for the register of buyers of wool and, in consultation with the Minister, to fix a code of practice to be observed by wool exporters. An Chomhairle were funded by an annual grant-in-aid, provided by the Oireachtas, which in the last three years averaged £100,000 per annum. Membership comprised a chairman and 11 other members, representative of the trade and producers. An Chomhairle had a staff of five, four of whom were seconded from, and paid by, my Department. The remaining member, a specialist in wool grading, was employed directly by An Chomhairle on a daily fee paid basis.

Before An Chomhairle were established, no standard system, whereby wool was purchased on a graded basis, existed. Indeed, there were no set standards in respect of buyers' or exporters' premises where wool was stored prior to export. The image of Irish wool, especially on export markets, needed to be improved. The main provisions of the 1968 Act, together with the principal related functions of An Chomhairle, provided for the proper grading and presentation of wool for sale, the registration of wool buyers and the licensing of wool exporters. On the recommendations of An Chomhairle, regulations were made by the Minister for Agriculture setting out minimum standards in respect of these matters. These regulations are still in being and will continue to be enforced by my Department. The inspection of buyers' and exporters' premises heretofore carried out by officers of my Department on behalf of An Chomhairle to ensure that standards are maintained, will be continued on the same basis as heretofore.

As part of the measures taken to reduce Exchequer expenditure, the Government decided, in February 1983, to dissolve An Chomhairle. As I emphasised in the Dáil, and I repeat here today, this decision should not be interpreted as a reflection on An Chomhairle, the marketing of wool is now in a much healthier state. Irish wool enjoys a very high reputation on world markets and commands a higher price per lb. on these markets than comparable types of New Zealand and British wools.

This year, especially, is turning out to be a good one for producers. Because of the exceptionally fine weather, the quality of wool coming on the market is very high. In the lowland areas, producers have sold their wool earlier than in previous years and it is estimated that approximately 65 per cent of the lowland clip has been disposed of at prices which are 10p-12p per lb. higher than last year.

Export of wool has also continued at an accelerated rate.

Wool from the hill areas, particularly along the western seaboard, has just commenced to come on the market and again, because of the high prices prevailing, producers are disposing of their wool quickly. This, of course, should be the practice whenever possible. Wool not properly stored will deteriorate and since many producers do not have the facilities to store wool for any considerable time the aim should be to dispose of their wool as early as possible into merchant stores where suitable facilities are available.

Total wool production in this country amounts to 13 million lb. per annum made up to 5.2 million lb. Galway, 3.7 million lb. Blackface Mountain, 2.9 million lb. Cheviot and halfbred and 1.2 million lb. of other types. The value of the national clip to producers is estimated to be worth in excess of £11 million a year — a significant contribution to farm incomes. Over 70 per cent of the Irish clip is exported, 65 per cent of which goes to Great Britain. The percentage of wool exported to Great Britain has been declining over the years as new markets were opened up, particularly in Europe and Eastern bloc countries. Exports to France and Belgium have shown significant increases. Czechoslavakia and Poland have been the main outlets in Eastern Europe but exports to that area have declined in recent years.

The EEC is not self-sufficient in the production of sheep meat and with the application of the CAP to that commodity I anticipate a substantial increase in our national flock, with a consequential increase in wool production.

Taking everything into account, I am satisfied that the wool industry has been placed on a sound footing and I am confident that the 80 licensed exporters will continue to seek out new markets and that the 306 registered buyers can effectively handle any increase in production. I am also confident that producers will continue to provide the high quality product which the market place demands. However, continuation of the successes already achieved will, of course, depend on the willingness of both traders and producers to observe the statutory requirements. In this connection I am fully satisfied that in co-operation with my Department, traders and producers can maintain progress.

Nevertheless, whilst the budget for An Chomhairle was a relatively modest one, I feel that the Members of the House will appreciate that, in the current financial situation, any scope for cutting back on Exchequer expenditure cannot be overlooked. In recent years, a high proportion of An Chomhairle's grant was spent in highlighting the need for clean wool presentation by means of fleece displays; in conducting training courses in wool grading and sheep shearing and in subsidising sheep shearing competitions at shows throughout the country. Expenditure was also incurred on press advertisements and display posters and promoting wool end-products through fashion shows, etc. All of these activities, whilst useful, are minor in the context of the Wool Marketing Act. The main intentions of the Act and the corresponding principal functions of An Chomhairle, have long since been implemented, and expenditure on An Chomhairle's recent activities cannot be justified in present circumstances.

The monitoring of world trends is, no doubt, an essential service to the wool industry. It provides up-to-date information on trends and prices and guarantees a fair return to producers in line with world trends. The market intelligence service will, therefore, be continued on a regular basis by my Department — as, indeed, it has been since An Chomhairle ceased to function.

The four officers seconded from my Department have returned and three of them have been assigned to other duties. The fourth is engaged in sheep breeding duties and is also assisting in implementing the statutory functions of the Act. No additional expenditure has arisen for my Department. Indeed, staff savings have been achieved through the more effective use of the returned staff. The wool grader employed by An Chomhairle has been paid his statutory redundancy entitlements and I understand that further claims he has made are under negotiament tions. Also, I am informed that he has secured outside employment in the industry.

The Bill also contains safeguard clauses in regard to creditors and other claimants of An Chomhairle. These are included in Article 3 which provides, in general, that any outstanding debts will be discharged by the Minister for Agriculture, and that every contract entered into or in force between An Chomhairle and any person, shall continue in the name of the Minister.

Article 4 provides that a final account of all moneys received and expended by An Chomhairle from 1 January 1983 to the day on which the last liabilities are discharged, shall be prepared for audit by the Comptroller and Auditor General prior to its presentation to both Houses of the Oireachtas.

The Bill, therefore, is a relatively straightforward one. I commend it to the House and am confident it will secure approval.

The abolition of any board that has been doing a good job in the promotion of Irish wool on the world market is a very retrograde step. Indeed, everybody admits that the Wool Council justified their existence and succeeded in educating wool producers on the importance of producing high quality wool and presenting it properly.

We all remember the days when farmers used tar to raddle their sheep and when they allowed all kinds of foreign matter to be included in the fleece in order to bring up the weight. It took a long time to convince farmers that this was wrong, that they were really damaging their own long-term prospects of improving the market for Irish wool. It was here that An Chomhairle Olla came in. Through a series of educational programmes, demonstrations and so on, they succeeded in doing trojan work in the preparation and presentation of Irish wool. Today the total wool production is worth £13 million per annum. Over 70 per cent of the clip is exported, giving a very valuable boost to our balance of payments situation. It is true to say that we would not have secured some of those markets if it had not been for the efforts of the Wool Council who sent delegations to visit wool markets in Britain, France and the Eastern Bloc countries to find out what was required and make that information available to Irish producers. They also kept farmers informed as to the price obtaining on foreign markets. This was very useful information because producers knew the best time to sell their wool.

Now the Government have decided that the Department of Agriculture will take over the responsibilities of the Wool Council. I cannot see the Department giving the same service to producers as the Wool Council have given, simply because the Department have so many other irons in the fire. No matter what gloss is put on this take-over let nobody tell me that it will improve the situation for Irish wool producers. Taken in the context of overall expenditure by the Department of Agriculture the £100,000 saved by disbanding the council is very small indeed. Instead of abolishing the Wool Council I would be happier if the Minister was here today seeking the approval of this House for the establishment of a wool marketing board as had been recommended originally by the committee set up in 1963 to deal with improvements in our wool.

Sheep numbers in 1983 amounted to 3,600,000. Sheep and wool together contribute £78 million or 3.65 per cent of total agricultural output. Our entry to the French market for Irish lamb has given a new dimension to sheep production in this country and has opened new horizons for our lamb and wool trade. Indeed, I would like to pay tribute to the man who succeeded in making that breakthrough, a former Fianna Fáil Minister, Mr. Jim Gibbons. He, more than any other Minister for Agriculture, deserves the thanks and respect of Irish sheep producers for the trojan work he did in getting Irish lamb into the French market in 1978. That move by Mr. Gibbons succeeded in getting the sheep industry established on a solid basis. Farmers who had abandoned sheep farming for the more lucrative beef and dairying industry began to have a new look at profit margins, and slowly sheep began to reappear on farms where they had been phased out some years earlier. Should this industry not then be nurtured, nourished and encouraged in every way by the Government instead of dismantling the very organisation that was set up to do that?

As a Galwayman, where the best sheep in the country are produced, I resent this penny pinching exercise by the Government. I am particularly incensed that a fellow Galwayman, the Minister of State, Deputy Connaughton, should be piloting this legislation through the House. He knows as well as I do that the Wool Council had done a good job. Indeed he is on record as having said so. He knows too that the educational programme they initiated is an on-going process and should be continued rather than retarded if we are to get the best result and the best price for our wool clip.

It was my job some years ago to reappoint the members of the Wool Council. I did so not on the basis of their political affiliation but on their knowledge of the industry as producers, traders and manufacturers. Those 11 people understood every aspect of the industry and were committed to its advancement in every way. The improvements that have taken place over the past 15 years in the presentation and marketing of Irish wool are a fitting testimony to their work. Indeed while I have the highest regard for the officials in the Department of Agriculture, I cannot honestly accept that they will have the same commitment because of their other responsibilities, as the Wool Council has.

I would like to see the Department more involved, perhaps with An Foras Taluntáis, in the area of breeding. Much has been done to improve the lambing rate. An Foras Taluntáis have been particularly active at their centre in Belclare. They have made remarkable progress there, progress that will benefit the whole agricultural industry and particularly those involved in sheep rearing. Farmers now realise that in order to achieve the highest prices for lambs on the French market they must produce good quality lambs that will grade properly when killed. Perhaps the Department could do more in helping producers to achieve those high results. We have keen competition from other European countries and indeed from New Zealand for the French market. It is up to the Department of Agriculture and our producers to ensure that we maintain a solid foothold on that market. I understand that the duties of the Wool Council will now be undertaken by one man. This will be an impossible task for him. In no way can he be expected to provide the same service as the Wool Council.

Every effort should be made to promote the sale of woollen materials at home and abroad. Irish blankets, tweeds and carpets are known all over the world. A little effort perhaps could improve the situation and prove to the world that Irish wool is far superior to the cheap synthetic material now being dumped here from foreign shores. It could, in its own way, contribute to the employment situation in this country. I am sure there are many mills that could perhaps take on additional employees if a proper promotional job was done and the value of our Irish woollen materials promoted throughout the world. I would imagine that it would have been better to give greater strength to the Wool Council to get them involved in this kind of activity, rather than dissolving them, and enable them to promote the sale of Irish woollen materials. I do not see any reason why they could not be engaged in this kind of work. It is unfortunate that the Government have to take this kind of action in order to save £100,000.

Debate adjourned.
Sitting suspended at 5.30 p.m. and resumed at 6.30 p.m.
Top
Share