I am very pleased to have the opportunity to address this House on the motion before us. I thank Senators Deenihan and O'Brien for having the interest of sport at heart in putting down this important motion. I am grateful to all the Senators who have contributed to the debate. It was very satisfying and interesting to listen to the contributions which were made, and I must say that it is apparent that each of the Senators who contributed did much preparation in obtaining the various facts and figures which were given in the course of the debate.
Another aspect of the debate which pleased me was the fact that there was no party flagwaving but rather were the contributions useful, informative and constructive. In the course of the debate there were some statements made which I believe were based on inadequate information, and I propose to deal with some of these misconceptions later in my address.
The Government policy in relation to sport is based on the principles of the European Sport for All Charter. The programme for the development of sport has as its objective the establishment of positive attitudes towards sport and physical recreation and the development of habits of regular and active participation in these areas through the provision of opportunities and facilities. The policy for sport, while placing its main emphasis on providing the best possible opportunities for the greatest number of people, sets out to stimulate participation at all levels of performance. In this context, elite sportsmen and the community at large are interdependent, and no attempt should be made to separate high level performance from competitive sport.
In Ireland, as elsewhere, there is a growing problem of alienation resulting in unrest, alcoholism, drug abuse, vandalism, violence, truancy and crime. Some of these problems can be related to increased leisure time and the lack of recreational opportunities for young people.
Sport and physical activity, as aspects of leisure time activity are not by themselves the only way to help to relieve the stress and tension of modern living, but certainly they are an essential part of any co-ordinated and integrated plan to help bring about an improved and healthier way of life. It is extremely important that the value of sport and physical activity is fully appreciated and that the beneficial outcomes of regular participation in sport for all sectors of our society are widely understood.
Within a community the level of participation in leisure and recreation provides an indicator to the strength of community spirit and therefore the confidence prevailing within a community. In areas of special need or disadvantaged areas this role of sport and recreation takes on a wider significance as it becomes a valuable mechanism in trying to meet the objective of reducing social disadvantage. While the varied nature of the problems in these areas calls for a comprehensive programme of action, properly co-ordinated, it is my firm belief that sport and recreation could make a very positive contribution within a wider framework to improve the quality of life in these areas.
The development of sport is implemented mainly through Cospóir, the National Sports Council, the national governing bodies of sport and the Olympic Council of Ireland.
For the information of the House, Cospóir is a body of 28 sports people who have been or are still deeply involved with sport, either as participants or as administrators. Each member of the sports council has been appointed in a personal capacity. However, there is a very wide representation of sporting interests on the council and the majority of the major sports are represented. Since its establishment Cospóir, through its many activities, has been endeavouring to increase participation in sport, and I am pleased that previous speakers have made reference to the massive upsurge in participation in sport and physical recreation which has taken place in the last number of years. I am certain that Cospóir's promotional campaigns and programmes have contributed in a very large way to the greater involvement of all our people in sports activities.
As examples of Cospóir's work in the area of heightening public awareness of the benefits of sport and of the opportunities for participation, I would mention such promotions as Community Sport for All Day, National Walk Day and National Bike Week.
Senators Deenihan and O'Leary spoke of the need to involve children in sport at an early age. This is a view which I also hold. Indeed, Cospóir also saw the need for a special initiative to involve primary school-children in sporting activities when, in 1983, the first Primary Schools Sport for All day was introduced. Such was the success of the Day that the Sport for All Day in the primary schools will now be an annual event. For the 1984 Sport for All Day in the primary school which was on 8 May, a wide range of promotional literature and a special booklet were sent to every primary school-teacher in the country. The special booklet contains hints and guidelines on the organisation of Sport for All activities and places these activities in perspective in relation to the total school physical education programme.
On 8 May I was delighted to have had the opportunity to witness at first hand the activities which were organised for the children. It was a very pleasant experience to see teachers and children enjoying themselves in sporting activities. I would like to pay tribute to the members of the Irish National Teachers Organisation and the boards of management for the enthusiasm, commitment and interest which they have shown by their involvement with this promotion. Without their assistance such a project could not succeed. Other Sport for All projects which have taken place or are planned in 1984 include:
A national conference in Westport in May last on "Outdoor recreation and leisure — future planning and development"; special promotions of badminton, bowling, orienteering, walking and mini-sports; a club development award scheme (in association with a sponsor); participation in the GAA Centenary Exhibition in the RDS; a GAA/Cospóir Club Day on 29 July; publication of a newsletter; courses for voluntary sports leaders; sailing courses for the less advantaged.
At local level, Cospóir's programmes are implemented through the 38 vocational education committees. These committees have established sports advisory bodies, under the aegis of Cospóir to co-ordinate and to implement Sport for All programmes within their own areas.
In addition to involvement in national campaigns, the sports advisory bodies maintain an ongoing programme of Sport for All activities at local level.
The relationship which has been established between Cospóir and the vocational education committees has been a very wise development and has been further consolidated by the setting up of the sports advisory bodies which are widely representative of local sports and other organisations on a very democratic basis.
Support for the programmes and activities of the sports advisory bodies is provided by way of annual grant-aid from my Department to the vocational education committees. I am very pleased that in 1984 I was in a position to allocate a sum of £770,000 to vocational education committees. I know from my own experience and from reports which I have received that the moneys which are allocated to vocational education committees for youth and sports programmes are having a very positive influence on sport at local level. In my own county I have attended a number of family activities days which are aimed at participation by the young and the old. These have proved to be a most successful undertaking.
The Sport for All policy, promoted by Cospóir is recognised as having created a favourable climate of public opinion in favour of sport and has contributed to an increased level of participation in sport. This, however, in turn has created problems for many sports organisations in that their structures have not been geared to cater for the demand for participation. The fact that most of the organisations are run on a voluntary basis, without any full-time administrative support, has limited the service which the national governing bodies of sport can provide.
I am very pleased indeed that in 1984 the Government have recognised the needs which are being created by increased participation in sport and that for the first time since the introduction of the grant-in-aid scheme to sporting organisations the allocation for sport has exceeded £1 million. Of this amount a sum in excess of £800,000 has been allocated in direct grant-aid to the national sports organisations.
This allocation represents an increase of 62 per cent over the 1983 grants and is evidence that the Government is committed to the development of sport. The grants to the national governing bodies of sport will assist towards the cost of coaching, administration, equipment, special projects to increase participation and improve standards and the hosting or travelling to international competitions.
One of the major beneficiaries from the grant-in-aid scheme has been the Olympic Council of Ireland, which received grants amounting to £240,000 from the sports allocation. The Olympic Council of Ireland is the "agent" of the International Olympic Committee in this country and is charged with the responsibility for the development of the Olympic movement here. It is also the task of the Olympic Council of Ireland to ensure the representation of Ireland's athletes at the Olympic Games, to organise and to supervise participation of their delegations, to provide equipment, transport, housing, insurance and medical attention.
Since 1924 the Olympic Council of Ireland has discharged its duty in relation to the development of the Olympic movement with dedication and efficiency, coupled with wisdom and integrity, in their approach to the many complex problems and undesirable developments which have occurred in sport over the years and which have tended to tarnish the high-minded ideals of the Olympic philosophy.
In the course of last week's debate I was disappointed and upset that a Member of this House should speak in such a hostile fashion in relation to the Olympic Council of Ireland. When one considers that the Olympic Council of Ireland has neither permanent headquarters nor permanent staff one must admit that their contribution to the development of sport in this country has been enormous.
For the information of the House, the Olympic Council of Ireland is an all-Ireland body which represents 22 affiliated sports recognised by international federations. The council executive is reelected every four years by the affiliated sports organisations. All officers of the council work in a voluntary capacity.
The Government are fully committed to the provision of funds to the Olympic Council of Ireland, and on behalf of the Government I would like to say that we are fully behind them in their efforts to promote the Olympic ideal.
The Government are particularly appreciative of the contribution made by the Gaelic Athletic Association to the fabric of Irish life, both in sporting and cultural events. To mark the celebration of the centenary year of the GAA a special grant of £100,000 was awarded in the budget in recognition of this contribution.
While on the subject, I would like, in response to Senator Lanigan's remarks about the level of funding of the GAA by the State, to point out that the special grant given in the budget was over and above the normal grant-aid given annually to the GAA by my Department. For example, in 1984 a grant of £44,500 was allocated under my Department's scheme of grants to national governing bodies of sport. My Department also pay £21,000 per annum in respect of the three development officers attached to the GAA, and many clubs benefit under the youth and sport grants allocated by the vocational education committees.
I would like to point out also that over the past five years GAA clubs throughout the country have received grants totalling £4 million under the Youth Employment Scheme, formerly the responsibility of my Department but now that of the Department of Labour. These grants have enabled rural clubs, in particular, to improve the amenities for their members and for the local community. I am giving the information not for the purpose of expounding the good deeds of the Government, but to provide information for anyone who may have been under a misapprehension in relation to the Government's commitment to Cumann Lúthchleas Gael.
A significant fact of sport in this country is the vast number of voluntary workers in clubs, sports associations and community groups who give of their time and talents in the cause of sport. No efforts by the Government to promote the concept and ideals of sport for all could achieve fruition without the interest and dedication of the voluntary workers, and to them I extend my congratulations and gratitude for their sustained efforts to maintain and improve the quality of life within our society.
Further evidence, if it be needed, of the importance which the Government attaches to the role of sport in society is reflected in other schemes run by my Department:
(a) To assist with the hosting of/attendance at international competition;
(b) The provision of financial assistance to enable sports organisations to develop sports exchanges with their counterpart organisations in France;
(c) The sports scholarship scheme under which young sports persons can pursue their career in sport while studying for the academic qualification of their choice. Seventeen young sports persons are at present in receipt of sports scholarships, and an advertisement was recently placed in the national press for the holding of competitions for five further scholarships this year.
(d) A Long Distance Walking Routes Committee was established to identify and lay out on a countrywide basis paths and tracks which will be suitable for both the short and long distance walkers. A major undertaking by this committee was the completion of the Wicklow Way which has now been extended as far as Aughavannagh, a total of 166 km. Plans are ongoing for the provision of other walking routes and it is hoped, through this initiative, to encourage greater numbers of people to participate in walking as a leisure pursuit.
(e) The payment of grants towards the employment of development officers by nine sporting organisations.
In this context I should mention in response to Senator Fallon's contribution that in addition to the £7,000 which the Government pays towards the development officer assigned to the National Community Games, the Government also pays a grant in respect of the salary of the general secretary of this organisation. Indeed the total grant-in-aid to the National Community Games in 1984 will amount to £58,300. Some of the major sporting organisations have had considerable success in obtaining sponsorship from the private sector, and here I wish to pay tribute to the Irish Basketball Association which has recently been successful in the franchising of some of its senior clubs, which will mean an investment of over £1 million in the next five years. The enthusiasm and commitment of the Irish Basketball Association should serve as an example to many other organisations.
The grant-in-aid scheme to national governing bodies of sport extends to 65 such bodies. Many of those represent minor sports, and if Senator Lanigan could let me have the names of other minor national governing bodies of sport which he feels should be funded by my Department I will certainly be very happy to have the matter considered.
Some of the speakers outlined their views on the desirability of having a coaching policy. Coaching plays an important and influential role in the development of athletes. The responsibility for coaching in individual sports rests solely with the national governing bodies of sport and their autonomy in this regard must be respected. However, it is a fact that many sports organisations have poor coaching structures and do not have the capacity to develop proper structures. There is, therefore, a need to analyse existing coaching structures, to examine means of raising the general standard of coaching and to establish a panel of top-class coaches. A national coaching programme which will offer to coaches of all sports and at all levels of participation opportunities to improve their coaching skills is required. The area of coaching is one to which I will be devoting special attention as funds become available for new developments.
Experience as a Minister with responsibility for sport has brought me to the conclusion that a more comprehensive form of funding for sport is required. In this context I have for some time now been pursuing the question of the establishment of a national sports lottery. Many previous Ministers with responsibility for sport spoke about the need and the desirability of having such a lottery. However, I am pleased to be able to advise the House that I have now succeeded in having the lottery proposal brought to Government and I am optimistic that a favourable outcome will be forthcoming.
As I refer to the desirability of having a sports lottery I want to state that in the event of the lottery becoming a reality a priority will be the building of a national sports centre which would provide top-class facilities for our sports. It would be my intention to have included in the centre, and I am sure that Senator Fallon will be pleased about this, a 50-metre swimming pool.
I also want to say in relation to the sports lottery that I am quite confident, with my experience of 18 months as Minister for Sport that I have no doubts about the success of such a lottery. As far as the governing bodies of sport are concerned it is necessary to have a more regular funding mechanism available to them. When I came into office in November, 1982 because of the economic situation at that time in the Book of Estimates which was prepared there was a reduction of 11½ per cent. It was not a very pleasant start for a Minister in dealing with the national sports organisations and dealing with Cospóir, the National Sports Council. I made a commitment at that stage that I would do everything in my power to make sure that sporting organisations who do so much on a voluntary basis, that people who give of their time and people who subscribe to the provision of facilities for our young people, would not be let down.
Before the year was out I was pleased that I was in a position to introduce a supplementary grant for those sporting organisations which brought the grant to the level of 1982, I am not saying this in any boastful fashion. The introduction and success of a national sports lottery would provide a regular funding mechanism which would enable those organisations to plan well into the future. That, I hope, will happen. I sincerely hope that the lottery if and when introduced will be a success.
The Government is constantly aware of its responsibility to the youth of Ireland and recognises that there is an urgent need to cater in the widest sense for recreational outlets to that leisure activities for all would be channelled into wholesome and positive outlets. The Government will continue to pursue vigorously this objective with a wide range of innovative measures to heighten public awareness of the value of sport and promote opportunities for the involvement of all people in worthwhile recreational pursuits.
In this address I have concentrated in the main on the funding which is made available by those areas of my own Department for which I have direct responsibility. Other funding which is important in the overall context of my Department's support for sport include the payment of salaries of physical education teachers, grants to Thomond College of Education through the Higher Education Authority, grants in respect of physical education equipment in schools, in-service courses for teachers, etc.
I would like to mention at this stage that, in the context of funding from the Department the Department, the Minister of the day and Cospóir should be seen to be there in a helpful and advisory supportive capacity. If tomorrow morning sufficient funds were available and if you could grant-aid and meet all the financial demands of the sporting organisations, sport would die a natural death. It is necessary to have grant aid that would match the voluntary effort by the community and sporting organisations and match equally the very generous sponsorship which is available for sport in this country.
A major input to the development of sport and recreation amenities is also made by other Government Departments and State agencies.
Examples are the provision of amenity grants and swimming pool grants by the Department of the Environment, capital and youth employment scheme, grants for recreational facilities from the Department of Labour, amenity development of forests by the Department of Forestry and Wildlife, public parks maintenance, etc. by the Office of Public Works, support for the Army School of Equitation and the sail-training scheme by the Department of Defence; the development of water sports, equestrian sports, etc. by Bórd Fáilte; health education promotions which emphasise the importance of sport and regular exercise by the Health Education Bureau.
While the investment which has been made in sport by the Government in 1984 is to be welcomed, much remains to be done. However, I feel that the allocation of £1.196 million directly to sport was a major step forward by the Government, having regard to the fact that in 1983 the provision for sport was £719,000.
I would like to remind the House that State-aid to sport is not intended to supplant but rather to be supportive and to supplement the finance already being generated in sport. However, it is recognised that there is a need for more development in sport in terms of facilities, coaching and financing, and it is the Government's intention to continue to provide as high a level of State funding for sport as is possible in the current economic situation.
I also want to mention the position in relation to facilities in which we are falling far behind. I am not blaming anyone in particular: we have not the facilities which are necessary to provide the incentive and necessary outlets for our young people. We must realise the importance of sport. We must also recognise and appreciate that it is necessary from the point of view of the State to finance sport. It is necessary to encourage it to lead towards a healthier community and to provide the unemployed with outlets for their energies. It costs so much at present to provide them with care in an institution. I believe a lot of violence, the level of drug abuse, the vandalism which we have, is created and caused by young people with nothing to do and nowhere to go. It is essential for all of us to recognise these facts, and that is why I am so pleased to attend this debate. It is in no sense a cause of flagwaving; we must realise and appreciate the strong economic argument that can be put up in favour of greater resources being made available to those people.
I have mentioned what I intend to do if resources are sufficient and if the lottery is a success, which I have no doubt it will. I would like to see greater co-operation between the governing bodies in sport so that we could make the best use of scarce resources. A situation has developed in this country where you have organisations who are doing their own thing in the provision of facilities. If we had the co-operation and co-ordination of all the people concerned we could make a better use of our scarce resources and we could provide facilities for our young people.
Only as recently as this morning I had discussions with people in Cospóir about ways and means by which we could bring that about. I hope that I will improve the position in my term of office. I accept what the Cathaoirleach says in relation to the handicapped and disabled. We have provided grants for these people. In the budget this year we provided a sum of money which would help those people, the area which I mentioned in relation to coaching and to the people who do the background work. We recognise achievement in the field of sport and we make awards: it is only right that we should. We would not have any awards or achievement in the field of sport were it not for coaches and people who do the background work. I am also considering ways and means by which we could provide some kind of recognition or awards for those people.
I am convinced from my term in office that from economic, social and political viewpoints — this is something that we never bear in mind — most of our national sporting organisations are 32-county based. I was very pleased to receive the people involved in the Special Olympics recently and to find out that between Derry and Belfast and Galway and Kerry, their organisations and their officers have a spread throughout the entire 32 counties. The amount of goodwill which can be generated by those organisations is very difficult to assess. I can assure you it is an important aspect of sport which should be encouraged. To all those who contributed I again want to express my gratitude.