Skip to main content
Normal View

Seanad Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 26 Feb 1986

Vol. 111 No. 9

Seanad Chamber Repairs.

I have a report from the Office of Public Works.

When the then Minister of State to the Minister for Finance, Deputy Joe Bermingham, spoke in this Chamber in December last he indicated that a job which started out to repair cracks in the plasterwork of the ceiling led to the discovery of dry rot in the rafters and to the necessity to replace a large timber beam which had sagged considerably in the middle and which supports the upstand at the front of the recess. As a result of the preparatory work undertaken in the replacement of this beam by a steel girder structural weaknesses have come to light in the form of extensive cracks in the wall which supports the beam. So far these cracks have only been investigated above the level of the false, ceiling. It will now, however, be necessary to strip the wall of the Chamber itself and possibly continue down through the Library and into the foundations. What was originally a job of plaster repair work, slow and labour-intensive but largely cosmetic, has now escalated into a major structural operation.

Under the existing working arrangement these structural repairs could involve some risk to the Members of the Seanad and would take an inordinate amount of time. Consequently, the Commissioners of Public Works are submitting to me for our consideration detailed proposals for the completion of the work. These proposals will be with me within three weeks from today. Once I receive them I will bring them to your attention without delay.

I propose you mark it "read."

Is it intended that the House should give more formal consideration to this document or to the report in three weeks time? It appears to me that dry rot has extended far beyond the ceiling into certain Government Departments. An epidemic of dry rot has broken out in the Office of Public Works. The thing is a bit farcical to say the least of it. There is no point in discussing it now, but we should take the opportunity of the report in three weeks time to have a discussion either in private or a formal one in public — I do not really mind. We should decide what we are going to do. It may well mean that the House would have to meet elsewhere or do something else like that. It is very important that we should give the matter consideration. I suggest that the matter would be considered by the Leader of the House and the Whips and the leaders of the other groups and parties in the House and that a set of proposals would be laid before the House shortly after this report is received in three weeks' time. The House should be given the opportunity of expressing their views on those proposals.

Before I call on the Leader of the House, it was my intention to bring this to the Committee on Procedure and Privileges as soon as I would get it in the three week period, discuss it there, and then come to the House.

I can do nothing more than concur with your suggestion, which is the most appropriate action. All groups in this House are represented on the Committee on Procedure and Privileges. The committee have discussed this matter on a number of occasions. We should take notice of what Senator O'Leary has said and we should accept the position that this House does expect, as soon as that report is available and that once there has been a reasonable amount of time for the committee to consider it, a substantial report and recommendation from the Committee on Procedure and Privileges should be made to this House.

Agreed.

Top
Share