Skip to main content
Normal View

Seanad Éireann debate -
Thursday, 9 Jul 1987

Vol. 116 No. 16

Export Promotion (Amendment) Bill, 1987: Committee and Final Stages.

Section 1 agreed to.
SECTION 2.
Question proposed: "That section 2 stand part of the Bill."

I should like clarification from the Minister on section 2. The Minister sought to avoid what he saw as the mistake of the business expansion scheme in its early stages by having this section written in a very clear and a very bare, bald way. I should like elaboration on subsection (2) which states that every application for a licence in respect of a special trading house shall be in such form as may be approved by the Minister, and it then goes on to state the way in which the Minister may refuse and that the person may reapply. I am a little concerned that a scheme which is meant to have speed as its essence may, because of a lack of clarity in the early stages, have people making applications without being fully aware of what exactly is expected, what the standards and conditions are.

The intention behind this Bill is for speedy decisions but frequently, as we know from experience, officials down the line for whatever reason — they may have a bad day, they may not have the information or they may be cautious — may not give the full information and a company might find itself to-ing and froing to the relevant people. This may build up frustration and people may decide it is not worth it, or there may be some disparity between one application and another. Under this section will the Minister be preparing very clear guidelines for universal application so that a company will know exactly what will or will not be relevant when they make an application and thus speed up the whole procedure?

Next Monday, I am launching a detailed leaflet which will be provided to every applicant. It will point out the six main areas which the applicants will be asked to cover: the memorandum and articles of association, the details of management structure, the source and value of proposed equity finance, the cash flow projections, the details of any contracts which they have with manufacturers, and the company's overall marketing and sales strategy. I am happy that after the launch of those details on Monday every applicant will have full information available and there is no reason why they should not respond to it as quickly as possible.

I appreciate the Senator's concern. When there is a licensing system involved or something to do with the Revenue Commissioners, there is always a fear that it will be delayed by bureaucratic approaches and strangled in some way. You cannot allow for that in legislation; all you can allow for in legislation is the licensing system. No matter what type of legislation you bring in, you are depending on the goodwill and sense of urgency of the people behind the scheme because if people are not energetic, encouraged by it and enthusiastic about it the best drafted scheme can get delayed and bogged down for many lengthy periods. I share a little of the Senator's worry but I think this will be covered in the publication of this document on Monday next which will lay out the criteria in detail. There is no time limit within which the Minister must give a decision, and that is something we could have considered, but we did not put it in the legislation.

I am very happy with the reply because if the scheme gets off to a bad start, or a slow start, it could get a bad name and its success could be impeded. Will the Minister be making available somebody in his Department with specific responsibility to answer queries should they arise, and will this person be known by name and easily contacted?

Yes. I have asked CTT to nominate a very senior executive to take charge of the scheme and they have informed me that they have done that. We will be announcing the name of that person next week also. There is a special group of people within the Department dealing with this scheme. This is a scheme that I will be very active in.

Question put and agreed to.
Sections 3 and 4 agreed to.
Title agreed to.
Bill reported without amendment, received for final consideration and passed.
Sitting suspended at 12.50 p.m. and resumed at 2 p.m.
Top
Share