I thank the Minister of State for coming into the House for this matter. The issue I am raising is the appointment of a remedial resource teacher to Camross national school in Laois which is one of a cluster of eight schools which do not have the facility of such a teacher. The other schools in the cluster are Killinure, two in Castletown, the Pike of Rushall, Borris-in-Ossory, Killesmestia and Paddock. There are two four teacher schools, five two teacher schools and one three teacher school. Between them there are approximately 560 pupils.
It is totally unacceptable that 20 years after remedial teachers were first appointed, these children should be without any remedial service. The eight schools between them need the appointment of two remedial teachers. The parents and the pupils of the schools feel they need remedial/resource teachers. These would be of huge benefit to the schools involved to deal not just with what we would usually call children who are in need of remedial teaching but also bright pupils. The teachers in these schools feel that they can deal adequately with the middle groups there, but it is the bright children and the children who tend to be a little slower in some subjects that are suffering.
I have spoken to the principal in Camross national school. She believes that as a result of not having the services of a remedial/resource teacher, many of the problems which could be addressed are not being addressed. If they had the services of a remedial/resource teacher, greater involvement of parents would be achieved. One of the issues she outlined was the fact that a lower than average percentage of children from these schools go on to third level education. She believes this is due to the fact that both the brighter and weaker children do not have the services of a remedial/resource teacher when it is needed in the primary sector.
I support the call for a remedial teacher. If two remedial teachers were appointed, these schools would be the last eight schools in County Laois to get such teachers and there would be a remedial/resource teaching facility available to all primary schools in that county. This is a reasonable demand.
Last year, 100 extra remedial teachers were appointed under the Programme for Competitiveness and Work, but it is my understanding that no remedial teachers are to be appointed in the 1996-97 academic year. It is this issue which has raised concern with the parents, teachers and pupils of these schools.
The Minister proposes to appoint remedial teachers only to schools situated in disadvantaged areas. I understand there are 25 disadvantaged rural areas and 25 disadvantaged urban areas. However, there are children with special needs in every school, and particularly in the eight schools I have outlined. It seems the Minister does not propose to provide any assistance to these children in the current year. These schools have waited long enough for this facility. In view of the fact that an appointment will not be made in 1996-97, when can these people hope to have the services of a remedial/resource teacher? Will the Minister consider making an appointment this year? These children should not be affected by the decision of the Minister to reduce the recruitment levels and appoint only 25 teachers to special schools in rural and urban disadvantaged areas. What we want is a balanced approach. I am not saying that I do not approve of remedial teachers being appointed to other disadvantaged areas, but the pupils in these schools should not be made to suffer as a result of the Minister's policy.