Gabhaim buíochas leis an Aire Stáit as ucht na ceiste seo a thógáil. Chuir mé spéis sa dara alt deireanach, ina dúirt an tAire Stáit go bhfuil "tréimhse de thrí mhí" tugtha ag an údarás don chomhlacht "plean gnó cuimsitheach trí bliana a ullmhú". An bhfuil siad ag dul i dtreo eile anois? Bhí siad ag breathnú ar infheisteoir straitéiseach, ach b'fhéidir go bhfuil an comhlacht ag iarraidh rámhaíocht ar a stuaim féin anois. An bhfuil Arramara Teo. ag smaoineamh ar fanacht mar ghnó faoi úinéireacht an údaráis go fóill beag, nó an bhfuil siad fós ag iarraidh páirtnéir idirnáisiúnta a aimsiú? An féidir liom bheith dána agus ceistín beag bídeach eile a chur? Is cuma cén todhchaí a bheidh ann - caithfear aire a thabhairt do lucht bainte na feamainne. Má thagann na bainteoirí le chéile chun ord agus eagar a chur orthu féin mar choiste, mar ghúpa nó mar chomharchumann, an mbeidh an tAire Stáit sásta buaileadh le toscaireacht beag chun plé a dhéanamh leo? Ba mhaith an rud é dá mbeadh grúpa ionadaíoch in ann idirbheartaíocht a dhéanamh leis an gcomhlacht mar atá, nó an comhlacht nua a bheidh ann. An mbeadh an tAire Stáit oscailte freastal ar a leithéid de chruinniú má thagann lucht bainte na feamainne le chéile? An dtabharfaidh sé tacaíocht dóibh grúpa ionadaíoch a eagrú?
Adjournment Matters (Resumed)
Like the Senator, I would like to be associated with 100,000 welcomes - céad míle fáilte - to the representatives of another island. I hope their stay on this green island of ours will be enjoyable and informative. I wish the delegation the best.
Mar is eol don Seanadóir, tá eolas agam ar Arramara Teo. le fada. Bhí sé lonnaithe i mo dháilcheantar féin uair amháin. Tá sé thiar i gCill Chiaráin anois. Bhí deis agam cuairt a thabhairt ar Arramara Teo. ag deireadh na bliana seo caite. Caithfidh mé a rá gur chuaigh an ghníomhaíocht agus an obair atá ag dul ar aghaidh ansin i bhfeidhm go mór orm. Tá feabhas mór tagtha ar chúrsaí Arramara Teo. ó ghlac Údarás na Gaeltachta cúram na dtionscal orthu féin. Bhí an comhlacht ag cailleadh airgid roimhe sin, ach tá sé ag déanamh brabaigh anois agus is maith an rud é sin.
Táimid ag súil go gcuirfidh bord Arramara Teo. a gcuid moltaí roimh Údarás na Gaeltachta ag an gcéad chruinniú eile i mí an Mhárta. Tá súil agam gur mar sin a bheidh. Tuigim go bhfuil intinn oscailte acu maidir le rannpháirtíocht a bheith acu le comhlachtaí eile. Tuigim go bhfuil comhráití ag dul ar aghaidh. Sa deireadh thiar thall, beidh an comhlacht ag brath ar an dearcadh a bheidh ag bord an údaráis i dtaobh an plean trí bliana a chuirfidh said chun tosaigh. Tá na hoibrithe in Arramara Teo an-tábhachtach. Tá 21 duine fostaithe sa chomhlacht, seisear nó seachtar dóibh san oifig. Tá na bainteoirí feamainne an-tábhachtach ar fad. Ní bheadh aon Arramara Teo. ann ach amháin go bhfuil an fheamainn á baint ag na daoine seo, a théann siar na glúinte. Ar ndóigh, beidh mé sásta buaileadh leo am ar bith.
Caithfidh mé a insint don Seanadóir - b'fhéidir nach dtuigeann sé é seo - gur minic a bhain mé feamainn, a d'iompar mé an fheamainn ar mo dhroim agus a rinne mé an bunábhar seo a spraeáil ar na prátaí. Mar sin, tá an-eolas agam ar chúrsaí feamainne ó mo thaobh féin de. Tá mé sásta buaileadh leo ag aon am, mar a dúirt mé, agus aon chuidiú agus aon chomhairle is féidir a thabhairt dóibh siúd atá ag baint úsáide as an acmhainn nádúrtha seo, atá ar fáil go flúirseach ar chósta na hÉireann.
Priory Hall Development
I raise an issue I have raised on several occasions in the House in the past 16 months, namely, the plight of the Priory Hall residents in Donaghmede. These are families who, as the Minister of State will know, were forced to move out of their homes overnight in October or November of 2011. They have now just come through their second Christmas in temporary accommodation, still living with uncertainty about the future. All that is certain is that they are not going back to Priory Hall. The building was not fit for purpose when they left it and is now worse because it has been abandoned for the past 16 months. However, the residents are still waiting for a long-term solution and still wondering what they will do about their mortgages and when the millstone of their Priory Hall apartments will be taken from around their necks.
There has been a resolution process in place for several months. I am trying to bring together the stakeholders to agree on a long-term solution. I ahve tabled this Adjournment debate to ask the Minister of State if there is progress to be reported. I hope there is because the continuing uncertainty is a nightmare for the families. It is also crazy from the State's point of view because the longer this goes on, the greater the cost to the State. Before Christmas, it was reported that Dublin City Council had spent €2 million on Priory Hall since the residents were evacuated. That relates to the cost of short-term accommodation and the costs of securing a derelict building that should, at this stage, be knocked down. I want to raise the issue with the Minister of State to ensure it continues to be a Government priority and I hope to bring a greater sense of urgency to the resolution process. Does the Minister of State have news to report and when we will finally see a solution for the residents of Priory Hall?
I thank the Senator for raising and pursuing this matter.
On behalf of the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government, Deputy Hogan, I again acknowledge the stressful situation being faced by the Priory Hall residents who have been out of their homes for almost 16 months, as the Senator has stated. I share the wishes of all concerned who would like to see this matter resolved. A Supreme Court hearing on an appeal by Dublin City Council against an order to pay for accommodation, storage and ancillary costs of residents forced to vacate their apartments at Priory Hall had been scheduled to take place on Tuesday, 24 April 2012. However, on Friday, 20 April 2012, the Supreme Court agreed to adjourn these proceedings to allow for a conciliation process between the parties. The conciliation process is being chaired by retired judge Mr. Justice Finnegan, former judge of the Supreme Court and President of the High Court, and provides an appropriate context for the parties concerned to work together towards identifying a way forward in this complex problem. Neither the Minister, Deputy Hogan, nor his Department is a party to the legal proceedings and has no direct role or involvement in the conciliation process. Out of respect for the process approved by the Supreme Court and for the retired Mr. Justice Finnegan, the Minister has consistently declined to make any comment on the matter other than to urge all stakeholders to engage fully with it and this remains his position. No one at this point can anticipate the outcome of the process and it is important that all concerned now afford Mr. Justice Finnegan the opportunity to complete the task which he has been given.
Dublin City Council has made commendable efforts to provide for the needs of residents to date and continues to work proactively on their behalf towards achieving the necessary and longed for resolution of the issues at Priory Hall. It remains committed to taking every reasonable step in its power to achieve this objective and the Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government will continue to liaise closely with the council in this regard. In particular the council, with the assistance of the Department, in consultation with NAMA, has secured alternative temporary accommodation for many of the residents. The council, with some assistance from the Department, continues to bear the cost of such accommodation and has confirmed that it will continue to do so while the conciliation process is under way. In the circumstances, I urge all concerned to allow Mr. Justice Finnegan the opportunity to complete the task he has been given.
I thank the Minister of State for being present in the House to give this reply. I must take issue with the point made in the reply that the Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government is not a party to the proceedings. Yes, the Department is not directly a party to the proceedings, but Dublin City Council is and the Department is responsible to this House for the actions of the local authorities around the country, including Dublin City Council.
As I said, Dublin City Council has spent more than €2 million of taxpayers' money to date on short-term accommodation and on the security of the Priory Hall building. If the council had risen to its responsibilities and accepted from the start that it had played a part in bringing this disaster about in the first place and engaged with the residents, this could have been avoided. Instead it fought them through the courts and did everything possible to avoid being part of the solution to the problem. The residents unanimously agreed to be part of the resolution process and see it as a very positive thing. I agree that Mr. Justice Finnegan must be allowed to do his work but I take issue with the statement that the Department does not have a responsibility. The Department has a responsibility to put pressure on Dublin City Council as a direct party to the resolution process to ensure it does everything it can to bring about a positive resolution. Of course, the banks are involved and this whole debacle is a result of the disgusting and unscrupulous practices of a particular developer also. However, I would like to see a more hands-on approach by the Government because the Department is responsible for Dublin City Council. We passed legislation in this House at 6 a.m. this morning for the liquidation of the IBRC and I understand that, as a consequence, Priory Hall will be under NAMA. The Government has a relationship with NAMA and more pressure needs to be brought to bear on the State agencies involved to bring about a final solution as soon as possible to end this nightmare for the residents.
I thank the Senator for her contribution. In the Minister's absence, I will bring it to his attention and ask him, if necessary, to get in touch with the Senator on these matters.