Skip to main content
Normal View

Special Committee on the Judicial Separation And Family Law Reform Bill,1987 debate -
Thursday, 9 Feb 1989

SECTION 21.

Chairperson

Amendment No. 18; as amendment No. 21 is related I suggest that we take both amendments together.

I move amendment No. 18:

In page 13, subsection (1), lines 26 and 27, to delete "a maintenance order pursuant to section 14 (1) (a) and 14 (1) (c)" and substitute "a periodical payments order under section 15 (1) (a)".

Amendment agreed to.

I move amendment No. 19:

In page 13, subsection (1), line 34, to delete "party" and substitute "spouse".

Amendment agreed to.

I move amendment No. 20:

In page 13, subsection (1), line 35, to delete "party to the marriage" and substitute "spouse".

Amendment agreed to.

I move amendment No. 21:

In page 13, subsection (2), lines 41 and 42, to delete "section 14 (1) (b) and 14 (1) (d)" and substitute "section 15 (1) (c) and 15 (1) (d)".

Amendment agreed to.
Section 21, as amended, agreed to.
NEW SECTION.

I move amendment No. 22:

In page 13, before section 22, to insert the following new section:

"22.—(1) Where the court has made an order to which this section applies, then subject to the provisions of this section and of section 19 of this Act, the court may, on application to it by either spouse, if it considers it proper to do so having regard to any change in the circumstances and to any new evidence, vary or discharge the order or suspend any provision thereof temporarily, revive the operation of any provision so suspended, and in any appropriate case again vary any such order or again suspend or revive its operation.

(2) This section applies to the following orders—

(a) an order for maintenance pending suit;

(b) a periodical payments order;

(c) a secured periodical payments order;

(d) that part of an order for the payment of a lump sum which provides for the payment of that sum by instalments or requires the payment of such instalments to be secured;

(e) an order in relation to the occupation of the family home, and

(f) an order for the sale of property.

(3) Without prejudice to the generality of section 15 of this Act that part of an order which provides for the support of a dependent child shall stand discharged where the child ceases to be a dependent child of the family by reason of his attainment of the age of sixteen years or twenty-one years, as the case may be, and shall be discharged by the court, on application to it under subsection (1) of this section, if it is satisfied that the child has for any reason ceased to be a dependent child of the family.

(4) The powers exercisable by the court under this section in relation to an order shall be exercisable also in relation to any instrument executed in pursuance of the order.

(5) No property adjustment order shall be made on an application for the variation of a periodical payments or secured periodical payments order made (whether in favour of a spouse or in favour of a dependent child of the family) under section 15 of this Act.

(6) Where the spouse liable to make payments under a secured periodical payments order has died, an application under this section relating to that order (and to any order which requires the proceeds of sale of property to be used for securing those payments) may be made by the spouse entitled to payment under the periodical payments order or by the personal representatives of the deceased spouse, but no such application shall, except with the permission of the court, be made after the end of the period of twelve months from the date on which representation in respect of the estate of the deceased is first granted.

(7) The personal representatives of a deceased spouse against whom a secured periodical payments order was made shall not be liable for having distributed any part of the estate of the deceased after the expiration of the period of twelve months referred to in subsection (6) of this section on the ground that they ought to have taken into account the possibility that the court might permit an application under this section to be made after that period by the person entitled to payments under the order; but this subsection shall not prejudice any power to recover any part of the estate so distributed arising by virtue of the making of an order in pursuance of this section.".

Very briefly this amendment concerning a variation in discharge of financial relief orders would replace section 22 of the Bill with more comprehensive provisions. The amendment would enable application to be made to the court for variation of lump sum instalment orders and orders for the securing of lump sums. While it is reasonable that a lump sum order should not be capable of being interfered with, there is no reason why an order for a lump sum relating to instalment payments and an order securing those instalments should not be variable. For example, if a husband is ordered to pay his wife £10,000 by 10 annual instalments of £1,000 each, the court could vary it by providing that it should be paid by five annual instalments of £2,000 or it may wish to change the security on which such payments might be secured.

Another matter which Deputies may wish to note is that the amendment does not provide for the variation of property transfer orders.

Amendment agreed to.
Section 22 deleted.
Top
Share