Skip to main content
Normal View

Thursday, 31 Jan 2013

Written Answers Nos. 90-99

Departmental Agencies Board Appointments

Questions (91)

Billy Kelleher

Question:

91. Deputy Billy Kelleher asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation if he will provide in tabular form the number of organisations or agencies under the aegis of his Department that have vacancies on their board; the length of time any such vacancies have been unfilled; the number of vacancies that have been advertised; the number of applications to fill such vacancies that have been received; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [4862/13]

View answer

Written answers

The following table sets out the details.

Name of Board

Current No of Vacancies

Length of time vacancy unfilled

No of vacancies advertised through PAS(Public Appointments Service)

No of Applications

Received

National Standards Authority of Ireland

1

14 April 2012

0

N/A

Enterprise Ireland

1

23 July 2012

1

45

Shannon Development

4

2 since April 2011 and 2 since April 2012

2

71

Industrial Development Authority

2

31 December 2012

2

77

National Standards Authority of Ireland

The current vacancy is due to be filled by a Department Representative.

Enterprise Ireland

The current vacancy was one of 4 advertised, three of which have been filled.

Shannon Development

Following the Government decision in relation to the future of Shannon Airport and Shannon Development it has been agreed that both I and the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport will make new common appointments to the Boards of both organisations in preparation for the establishment of the new company on a statutory basis in order to maximise the synergy between the two entities.

Employment Rights Issues

Questions (92)

Joanna Tuffy

Question:

92. Deputy Joanna Tuffy asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation the exemptions to the Organisation and Time Working Act 1997 that exist; if his Department has received any requests on behalf of those exempted to extend the provisions of the Act to those exempted workers including from representative organisations; if he will consider amending the Act to ensure all workers here including those working in transport and trainee doctors as well as all State employees have the same maximum working week and statutory rest periods as other workers; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [5010/13]

View answer

Written answers

The EU Working Time Directive provides for a number of exclusions from its scope. The original 1993 Working Time Directive (93/104/EC), which was transposed into national law by the Organisation of Working Time Act 1997, applied to all sectors of activity, both public and private, within the meaning of Article 2 of the Framework Health and Safety Directive 89/391/EEC. Article 2.2 of that Directive provided for exceptions in respect of certain public service activities, such as the armed forces or the police, and certain activities in the civil protection services. Therefore, when transposing the Directive, both the Defence Forces and the Garda Síochána were excluded from the Organisation of Working Time Act 1997. In addition, Regulations exempting the Civil Protection Services from certain provisions of the 1997 Act were also promulgated, i.e. the Organisation of Working Time (Exemption of Civil Protection Services) Regulations 1998 - S.I. No. 52 of 1998. However, subsequent Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) rulings have indicated that the normal activities of the armed forces, emergency services or civil protection forces are covered by the Working Time Directive.

I have not received any formal request to extend the provisions of the Act to An Garda Síochána or to the Defence Forces from my colleague the Minister for Justice and Equality and Defence. However, in the context of the revised rosters in the Garda Síochána, which are currently being piloted, the Department of Justice and Equality has been in consultation with my Department on the question of the application of the Organisation of Working Time Act to members of the Garda Síochána and I understand that this work is ongoing in that Department. The Minister has also advised me that a working group comprising representatives from the Department of Defence and the Defence Forces are currently examining the application of the Organisation of Working Time Act to the Defence Forces.

The 1993 Working Time Directive had excluded the activities of doctors in training and most transport sectors such as air transport, rail transport, road transport, sea transport, inland waterway and lake transport as well as sea fishing and other work at sea. However, the 2000 Working Time Directive (2000/34/EC) amended the 1993 Working Time Directive to cover most workers in the sectors which had been excluded from that earlier Directive. Provisions to extend the scope of the Working Time Directive to many of the previously-excluded sectors were then transposed into national legislation under various Statutory Instruments. These Regulations included the Organisation of Working Time (Inclusion of Transport Activities) Regulations 2004 – S.I. No. 817 of 2004, the Organisation of Working Time (Inclusion of Offshore Work) Regulations 2004 – S.I. No. 819 of 2004, the European Communities (Workers on Board Sea-going Fishing Vessels)(Organisation of Working Time) Regulations 2003 – S.I. No. 709 of 2003. In addition, Regulations transposing the provisions on Doctors-in-Training were promulgated by the Minister for Health as set out below.

With regard to doctors in training, the 2000 Working Time Directive (2000/34/EC) provided for a derogation which would phase-in the maximum 48-hour average working week over a transitional period of five years from 1 August 2004. This provision was transposed into Irish legislation by Regulations promulgated by the Minister for Health by way of Statutory Instrument No. 494 of 2004 - the European Communities (Organisation of Working Time) (Activities of Doctors in Training) Regulations 2004 (as amended by Statutory Instrument No. 553 of 2010). These Regulations implemented a phased reduction from an average of 58 weekly working hours to an average of 48 hours (as provided for under the Working Time Directive) from 1 August 2009 onwards. The amending S.I. 553 of 2010 in relation to Doctors in Training provided for derogations from the rest breaks and daily and weekly rest provisions, where equivalent periods of compensatory rest are provided.

With regard to the Transport sector, the provisions of the amending 2000 Directive were transposed into Irish law by my Department by way of S.I. No. 817 of 2004 – the Organisation of Working Time (Inclusion of Transport Activities) Regulations 2004. These Regulations transposed the 2000 Directive in relation to transport workers, with some exceptions, namely those workers performing mobile road transport activities as provided for in Directive 2002/15/EC (i.e. workers subject to tachograph rules), and mobile staff in civil aviation as defined in the Annex to Council Directive 2000/79/EC of 27 November 2000. The effect of the transposition of those provisions of Directive 2000/34/EC relating to the transport sector was to apply the maximum average working week of 48 hours to mobile and non-mobile transport workers covered by that Directive. S.I. No. 817 of 2004 revoked the earlier 1998 Regulations (i.e. the Organisation of Working Time (Exemption of Transport Activities) Regulations, 1998 – S.I. No. 20 of 1998) which had exempted the transport sector from the rest provisions and weekly working hours provisions of the Organisation of Working Time Act. However, the exemptions in relation to the rest provisions continued to apply in S.I. No. 817 of 2004, subject to compensatory rest.

A number of other Community instruments set out more specific working time requirements for particular sectors or occupational activities, and these take precedence over the provisions of 2003 Working Time Directive (2003/88/EC) which consolidated and repealed the earlier Working Time Directives. These Community instruments are, in the main, in the transport sector, and my colleague the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport has given these effect in national law.

Question No. 93 withdrawn.

Redundancy Payments

Questions (94)

Jerry Buttimer

Question:

94. Deputy Jerry Buttimer asked the Minister for Social Protection if a person who has been made redundant, but has not yet received the redundancy payment, may accept a new job offer with a different employer and still receive the redundancy payment; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [4840/13]

View answer

Written answers

Where an eligible employee is made redundant his/her eligibility for a statutory redundancy payment is not affected by accepting a job offer with a different employer. The exception to this is where the employment was subject to a transfer of undertaking, that is, where one company assumes responsibility for another including maintaining the employee’s continuity of service. The purpose of the redundancy payments scheme is to compensate workers, under the Redundancy Payments Acts 1967 - 2012, for the loss of their jobs by reason of redundancy. Compensation is based on the worker’s length of reckonable service and reckonable weekly remuneration. An eligible employee is entitled to two weeks’ pay for every year of service, plus a bonus week, subject to a ceiling of €600 per week.

In order to be eligible for a redundancy lump sum payment, an employee must:

- have at least two years continuous service;

- be in employment which is insurable under the Social Welfare Acts;

- be over the age of 16; and

- have been made redundant as a result of a genuine redundancy situation meaning that the job no longer exists and he/she is not replaced.

It is the responsibility of the employer to pay statutory redundancy to all their eligible employees. Where an employer can prove to the satisfaction of the Department that it is unable to pay statutory redundancy to its eligible employees the Department will make lump sum payments directly to those employees and will seek to recover the debt from the employer.

Disability Allowance Appeals

Questions (95)

Paschal Donohoe

Question:

95. Deputy Paschal Donohoe asked the Minister for Social Protection when a decision will issue on a disability allowance review in respect of a person (details supplied) in County Mayo in view of the fact that supporting medical evidence was submitted to the Department some time ago; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [4842/13]

View answer

Written answers

The person concerned applied for disability allowance on 2 May 2012. The application was refused on the ground that, based on the information supplied, the person was not medically suitable for disability allowance. The person was notified in writing of this decision on 23 July 2012. The person subsequently forwarded further medical evidence in support of his application which has now been examined. The person’s claim is with a deciding officer who will review the application. If further information is required the person will be notified. The person in question will be notified directly of the outcome of this review as soon as possible.

Departmental Agencies Board Appointments

Questions (96)

Billy Kelleher

Question:

96. Deputy Billy Kelleher asked the Minister for Social Protection if she will provide in tabular form the number of organisations or agencies under the aegis of her Department that have vacancies on their board; the length of time any such vacancies have been unfilled; the number of vacancies that have been advertised; the number of applications to fill such vacancies that have been received; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [4865/13]

View answer

Written answers

The statutory bodies operating under the aegis of the Department of Social Protection are the Citizens Information Board, the Pensions Board, the Pensions Ombudsman (which does not have a board) and the Social Welfare Tribunal. The Citizens Information Board and the Pensions Board have unfilled vacancies on their boards. The information sought is set out in the following table.

PQ 4865/13

Citizens Information Board

Pensions Board

Board vacancies

2

2

Length of time vacancies unfilled

2 since 30 March 2012

1 since December 2010

1 since December 2011

Number of vacancies advertised

0

0

Number of applications to fill vacancies

0

0

Citizens Information Board

Arrangements are being made to seek public expressions of interest in the board vacancies which will be filled in accordance with the procedures for appointment to State boards and bodies agreed by Government in May 2011.

Pensions Board

The Public Service Reform Programme provides for a critical review of the Pensions Board with a view to integrating the regulatory functions of the Pensions Board with the Financial Regulator. The Public Service Reform Programme also provides for a critical review of the Pensions Ombudsman with a view to a merger with the Financial Services Ombudsman. The Group established to carry out the reviews announced under the Public Service Reform Programme is finalising a draft report with recommendations. The report will identify any potential savings arising from such an amalgamation. The final report from the Group is expected to be available in the very near future. Following receipt of this report, decisions in relation to reform, including the filling of vacancies will be taken.

Rent Supplement Scheme Applications

Questions (97)

Seán Ó Fearghaíl

Question:

97. Deputy Seán Ó Fearghaíl asked the Minister for Social Protection if she will expedite an application for rent supplement in respect of a family (details supplied) in County Kildare; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [4889/13]

View answer

Written answers

There is no record of a rent supplement application in respect of the person concerned. If the person concerned wishes to apply for rent supplement he should complete an application form and return it to the Kildare Rents Unit, PO Box 11758, Dublin 24.

Illness Benefit Appeals

Questions (98)

Patrick Nulty

Question:

98. Deputy Patrick Nulty asked the Minister for Social Protection if an application for illness benefit will be expedited in respect of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 15; the reason for the delay; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [4909/13]

View answer

Written answers

Payment of illness benefit, to the person concerned, was disallowed by a Deciding Officer following an examination by a Medical Assessor of the Department who expressed the opinion that she was capable of work. An appeal was opened and in the context of that appeal, her case was reviewed by a second Medical Assessor who also expressed the opinion that she was capable of work. I am informed by the Social Welfare Appeals Office that, in the light of this second medical opinion, that office decided to afford her an opportunity of setting out the complete and up to date grounds of her appeal. On receipt of her response the relevant Departmental papers will be requested from the Department and the appeal will then be referred to an Appeals Officer for consideration. The Social Welfare Appeals Office functions independently of the Minister for Social Protection and of the Department and is responsible for determining appeals against decisions on social welfare entitlements.

Question No. 99 withdrawn.
Top
Share