Skip to main content
Normal View

Tuesday, 8 Apr 2014

Written Answers Nos. 147-169

IBRC Mortgage Loan Book

Questions (147)

Seamus Healy

Question:

147. Deputy Seamus Healy asked the Minister for Finance the fraction of the book value that was paid recently by Lone Star and Oaktree Capital for the non-performing loans which had been originally drawn down from Irish Nationwide Building Society; the status of the assurance by Lone Star and Oaktree Capital that they will comply with Central Bank of Ireland guidelines in dealing with mortgage debt; the entity this assurance has been given; if it is a written assurance; if the assurance is legally binding on Lone Star and Oaktree Capital; if he will urgently bring forward legislation to protect these mortgage holders from arbitrary mortgage increases and repossessions; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16577/14]

View answer

Written answers

I have been informed by the Special Liquidators that they will not be providing information relating to amounts paid for portfolios by third parties as this is commercially sensitive information.

As the third parties are not regulated entities they are not required to comply with the Central Bank of Ireland Code of Conduct on Mortgage Arrears (CCMA). However he two purchasers of the residential mortgage loans, Loan Star and Oaktree, have both voluntarily committed to servicing these books in accordance with the terms of the CCMA.

The Government has always been clear that we would ensure mortgage holders maintained the protection of the CCMA. The Department's Legislative Programme includes the Sale of Loan Books to Unregulated Third Parties Bill, which will address concerns surrounding the continued applicability of the CCMA after loan books are sold to unregulated entities.

In preparation for this legislation, my officials have been considering how best to ensure that the protections under the CCMA and other Codes continue to apply when a loan book is sold to an unregulated entity. Progress is being made and draft heads of legislation have been sent to the Central Bank for their consideration in advance of more detailed engagement with the Attorney General s office.

It is important to highlight that the contractual terms and conditions of all customer mortgages and other borrowings of Irish Bank Resolution Corporation have not changed as a result of the appointment of the Special Liquidators nor will those terms and conditions change as a result of the sale of these obligations to a third party. Purchasers of mortgage loans will be obliged to honour the legal terms of the loan agreements.

Property Tax Yield

Questions (148, 149)

Kevin Humphreys

Question:

148. Deputy Kevin Humphreys asked the Minister for Finance if he will provide in tabular form the amount of local property tax collected in each local authority in 2013 for the LPT due in that calendar year; the amount collected to date in 2014 for each local authority; the projected amount for 2014 to be collected in each local authority; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16578/14]

View answer

Kevin Humphreys

Question:

149. Deputy Kevin Humphreys asked the Minister for Finance if the Revenue Commissioners have informed each local authority of the projected amount of local property tax that will be raised in their area in 2014 and 2015 respectively; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16580/14]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 148 and 149 together.

I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that compliance data in relation to the Local Property Tax (LPT) is available broken down by city and county councils nationally and the most up to date figures for LPT collected in 2013 and 2014 were published on 18 February 2014 on the Commissioners website at: http://www.revenue.ie/en/tax/lpt/lpt-stats-0214.pdf. The Commissioners have confirmed that by the end of December 2013, €318m had been transferred by Revenue to the Exchequer in respect of LPT.  Of this amount, €242m was in respect of LPT for 2013 and €76m relates to 2014 LPT. By the end of March 2014, a further €214.3m was transferred by Revenue to the Exchequer.

 The Deputy may be aware that the deadline for property owners to bring their LPT affairs (including the Household Charge) up to date and avoid interest and penalties was 2 April 2014.  I am advised by the Commissioners that their current priority is processing the large volume of Returns and payments received and they expect to publish more detailed data and analysis in due course.

While the 2014 forecasted yield for LPT is €550 million, the Commissioners advise that it is not possible to state the precise amount of LPT which is expected to be collected for 2014 for each city and county council. A number of factors could affect the outcome, including the continuation of the strong level of voluntary compliance that was achieved in 2013, the impact of Revenue's national compliance programme to follow up with those liable persons who have failed to meet their LPT obligations for 2013 and 2014, and the compliance programme for the collection of arrears of household charge/LPT. 

I am advised that these factors will also, most likely, affect the outcome for 2015.  The Deputy will also be aware that Section 20 of the Finance (Local Property Tax) Act 2012 (as amended) allows elected members of a local authority to pass a formal resolution to vary the basic rate of LPT by up to 15% for their functional area, which may result in a lower or higher LPT rate applying for 2015, with a corresponding impact on the LPT yield for 2015.

The published LPT data for 2013 and 2014 are readily available to all local authorities from the Revenue website. I am advised by the Commissioners that the 2013 statistics could be used as a basis for providing an estimate of the projected amount of LPT to be collected in the local authority area for 2014 and 2015, by doubling the 2013 figure (since a half year charge applied in 2013).

 I am further advised that the Revenue Commissioners have had extensive engagement with local authorities over the past eighteen months, both directly with authorities themselves and through a series of meetings with representatives of the City & County Managers Association (CCMA) and its sub-groups.  The Commissioners, I am also informed, are keen to ensure that the process of engagement continues and to provide any assistance to local authorities that they can.

Property Tax Administration

Questions (150)

Kevin Humphreys

Question:

150. Deputy Kevin Humphreys asked the Minister for Finance if the Revenue Commissioners have written to each local authority in the State requesting the rate they intend to charge for the local property tax in 2015 if they decide to vary the rate as per statute in their area; if he will provide a sample letter; the timeline envisioned in this process; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16581/14]

View answer

Written answers

I assume the Deputy is referring to section 20 of the Finance (Local Property Tax) Act 2012 (as amended) which allows elected members of a local authority to pass a formal resolution to vary the basic rate of Local Property Tax (LPT) in respect of residential properties situated within their functional area. The basic LPT rate can be increased or decreased by up to 15%. This is referred to as the local adjustment factor (LAF) and the earliest year that this can apply is 2015.

Local authorities are required under section 21 of the 2012 Act to notify Revenue on or before 30 September 2014 if they wish to vary the LPT rate that will apply in 2015. This statutory deadline is to ensure that all the necessary administrative arrangements can be put in place for the payment of LPT at the appropriate rate in 2015 and most importantly, that property owners are given adequate notice of their LPT liability for 2015 to enable them to select their preferred payment method in good time for the filing date. 

I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that as part of their customer service and information campaign they have already commenced engagement with local authorities in relation to the LAF. At the end of March, the Commissioners wrote to City and County Managers, outlining details of sections 20 and 21 of the 2012 Act and drew their attention to the 30 September deadline for notifying Revenue of any adjustments to the LPT rate for 2015.   

The Commissioners have provided a sample copy of the letter for the Deputy's information.

Parliamentary Questions Costs

Questions (151)

Joan Collins

Question:

151. Deputy Joan Collins asked the Minister for Finance the costs to his Department to process and respond to a priority, an oral and a written parliamentary question. [16591/14]

View answer

Written answers

Servicing the parliamentary process through answering Parliamentary Questions (PQs) is a core responsibility of all Department of Finance staff. Accordingly, my officials have not estimated a specific cost for the process of responding to PQs.

In line with my Department's determination to improve efficiencies across all the ways in which we work, a central coordination unit is responsible for ensuring all PQs are dealt with appropriately and in a timely manner. In 2013, the Department began the process of improving IT infrastructure and information systems, not only to ensure that efficiencies are achieved but also to ensure better knowledge-sharing and information management. As part of the roll-out of this IT strategy, in the past number of months my Department has rolled out the new ePQ system for the electronic processing and management of  Parliamentary Questions.

Tax Code

Questions (152)

Robert Dowds

Question:

152. Deputy Robert Dowds asked the Minister for Finance if he is considering revising the way first-time home buyers are treated in terms of stamp duty following the expiry of the exemption; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16602/14]

View answer

Written answers

Budget 2011 reduced the Stamp Duty rate on residential property purchases while abolishing some reliefs and exemptions, including First Time Buyer relief. This was done to help broaden the tax base and lower the rate of stamp duty for most purchasers. All purchasers of residential property under €1 million in value, are now only liable for stamp duty at 1%.

I have no plans at this time to reintroduce First Time Buyer relief.

Tax Code

Questions (153)

Michael Healy-Rae

Question:

153. Deputy Michael Healy-Rae asked the Minister for Finance the position regarding the tax implications of the transfer of leased out entitlements (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16612/14]

View answer

Written answers

I assume the Deputy is referring to single farm payment entitlements. A single farm payment entitlement is a chargeable asset for capital gains tax (CGT) purposes and once acquired it may be disposed of by way of sale, gift etc. Accordingly, gains arising from the disposal of single farm payment entitlements are chargeable to CGT in the same way as gains made on any other chargeable assets. Where total gains in any year do not exceed €1,270 they are not chargeable to CGT.

With regard to the transfer of single farm payment entitlements for VAT purposes, where a payment entitlement is sold without land then VAT is due at the standard rate on the sale if the sale proceeds exceed the relevant threshold for VAT registration (currently €37,500). However, where a payment entitlement and land are sold together to a person who intends to carry on the farming business, then the sale may be treated as the transfer of a business and not subject to VAT. There may be other less significant tax implications in certain instances.

Officials in my Department are considering this issue with officials from the Department Agriculture, Food and the Marine. However, I have no plans at this time to alter the tax treatment referred to above.

EU Directives

Questions (154)

Michael McGrath

Question:

154. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance his views on the recently agreed single resolution mechanism for banks; if he is concerned by the size of the fund and the timetable for its creation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16625/14]

View answer

Written answers

I am of the view that the agreement on the Single Resolution Mechanism is a significant achievement that helps increase the stability of banks and the overall banking system in the participating Member States and should also significantly reduce the spill-over effects of crises into non-participating Member States  and as such will facilitate the functioning of the internal market.

As the Deputy is aware the Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM) is a centralised resolution mechanism for Member States who belong to the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM). Its purpose is to ensure that resolution can take place at the same level as supervision, rather than being conducted at national level.   It is considered an important contributing factor to breaking the link between the sovereign and the banking sector. 

The SRM will allow decisions to be made in a more objective and independent fashion than if they were been made by national supervisors. The proposal which has been agreed sees the SRM taking its decisions in line with the principles of resolution set out in the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD) in particular that shareholders and creditors should bear the costs of resolution before any external funding is granted, and private sector solutions should be found instead of using taxpayers' money. 

In relation to the Deputy's question regarding the size of the fund, the expectation is that in most scenarios, contributions by shareholders and creditors should be sufficient to finance resolution. If exceptionally, additional resources were needed, the Single Resolution Fund with a target level of 1% of covered deposits within the Banking Union (approx. €55bn) will come into place as a last resort to finance the bank resolution process. This target level was calibrated by the European Commission when the proposal was first published and it takes account of the fact that losses will firstly be applied to the institutions' shareholders and creditors. The SRM regulation also requires the Board of the SRM to contract financial  arrangements for the Single Resolution Fund  where the amounts raised through contributions from institutions' are not sufficient to meet the Fund's obligations.

It is important to keep in mind that resolution is just one aspect of the package of financial reforms being introduced to restore confidence in the banking system and to make it more resilient to future financial crisis. There are also a number of measures within the resolution proposals and within other legislative reforms that require banks to organise themselves in such a way that greatly reduces the risk of their failure but also ensures they have appropriate mechanisms in place to withstand future crises should they arise. The powers of supervisors will also be significantly enhanced to ensure that they are in a position to impose requirements on banks that are commensurate with the level of risk on their books.

Better regulated and supervised banks will be stronger, more resilient, and operate to benefit the real economy at large, as well as ensuring that taxpayers don't have to foot the bill for banks' mistakes. The resolution framework will be there to ensure that there is a mechanism in place at EU level to deal with future bank failures should they arise, but reinforced supervision and robust preventative measures are key in minimising the risk of this happening and reducing any costs likely to arise.

On the issue of the timetable, it should be noted that the final agreement on the SRM reduces the transition period to a fully mutualised Single Resolution Fund from ten years down to eight years and I am supportive of this change. It also provides for accelerated mutualisation in the early years - 60% by the end of year 2. This is a very important feature and demonstrates the seriousness of Member States to break the link between the sovereign and the banking sector as quickly as possible. 

Credit Availability

Questions (155, 168)

Dominic Hannigan

Question:

155. Deputy Dominic Hannigan asked the Minister for Finance the steps he will take to ensure that businesses in County Meath can access credit from banks and other lending institutions; if he will provide figures on the amount of lending that has been given to small and medium enterprises in County Meath in each of the years 2011, 2012 and 2013; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16634/14]

View answer

Bernard Durkan

Question:

168. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Finance the extent to which small and medium-sized enterprises seeking credit from their respective lending institutions have been accommodated by their banks in each of the past three years to date; the extent to which unsuccessful applications have succeeded on appeal; if in the case of refusal any assessment has been undertaken of the main reasons for refusal such as poor credit rating which can be attributed to other factors; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16802/14]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 155 and 168 together.

As part of the 2011 recapitalisation exercise, the Government imposed SME lending targets on AIB and Bank of Ireland for the three calendar years, 2011 to 2013. Each bank was required to sanction lending of at least €3 billion in 2011, €3.5 billion last year and €4 billion in 2013 for new or increased credit facilities, including working capital, to SMEs. Both banks have achieved their lending targets.

The credit review process remains available to any SME whose credit has been reduced or withdrawn by AIB or Bank of Ireland as well as when credit is refused by them. I would strongly advise any SME whose credit is reduced or withdrawn to avail of the services of the Credit Review Office.

Action Plan for Jobs 2014 contains a range of actions to encourage access to credit for SMEs and enhance the measurement and reporting by the banks of their lending to the sector. These include:

- Work with KfW and the German Ministry of Finance to develop an initiative that will improve funding mechanisms for SMEs.

- Detailed data from AIB and Bank of Ireland will be collated and examined on a monthly basis ensuring a more informed understanding of the SME bank lending environment with a particular focus on new lending.                                       

- The SME State Bodies Group will be rolling out a comprehensive communications strategy to ensure that SMEs are aware of the State supports for which they may be eligible, which may include supports for working capital purposes.

In addition, the SME Funding Consultation Committee, chaired by the Department of Finance, provides a forum for consultation with stakeholders around Government policy regarding the provision of credit to SMEs.

As regards the unsuccessful applications that have succeeded on appeal, the Credit Reviewer's thirteenth report , published on 24 March, contained the table below which sets out the relevant information.

 

AIB

Appeals

WIP

Borrower

Appeals Upheld

Borrower

Appeals Declined

Total

Internal

Appeals

BoI

Appeals

WIP

Borrower

Appeals Upheld

Borrower

Appeals Declined

Total

Internal

Appeals

2010

 

22

45

67

 

 

6

83

89

2011

 

68

85

153

 

 

12

167

179

2012

 

93

191

284

 

 

7

101

108

2013

 

79

173

252

 

 

45

95

140

2014

8

3

6

17

 

0

5

8

13

TOTAL

8

265

500

773

 

0

75

454

529

  I am informed by AIB and Bank of Ireland that they do not report lending to SMEs by county. In addition, I am informed by the banks that the main reasons for refusal of credit to SMEs include lack of repayment capacity, poor account operation profile, security related issues and non-viable business plans.

Tax Yield

Questions (156)

Denis Naughten

Question:

156. Deputy Denis Naughten asked the Minister for Finance the total value of funds collected under the income levy in 2010; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16732/14]

View answer

Written answers

I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that the total value of net receipts collected under the Income Levy in 2010 amounted to €1,446 million. This information was published in the Revenue Commissioners' Annual Report for 2010, which is available at http://www.revenue.ie/en/about/publications/annual-reports/archive/2010/index.html.

Tax Yield

Questions (157)

Denis Naughten

Question:

157. Deputy Denis Naughten asked the Minister for Finance the total value of funds collected under the universal social charge in 2011, 2012 and 2013 respectively; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16733/14]

View answer

Written answers

The Universal Social Charge (USC) was introduced in Finance Act 2011 and applies for the tax year 2011 and subsequent tax years.

The yield from the charge for the years specified is

Year

Yield

2011

€3,114m

2012

€3,790m

2013

€3,930m

USC is a tax payable on gross income, including notional pay, after any relief for certain trading losses and capital allowances, but before pension contributions. It is not charged on social welfare and similar type payments, or on income which was already subjected to DIRT.

Tax Reliefs Cost

Questions (158)

Denis Naughten

Question:

158. Deputy Denis Naughten asked the Minister for Finance the total value of tax reliefs for health expenses in 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 respectively; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16734/14]

View answer

Written answers

I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that the costs to the Exchequer of tax relief for health expenses in 2010 and 2011, the latest years for which final data are available, are €127 million and €131 million respectively. These include relief claimed by both self-employed and PAYE taxpayers. Information for more recent years is not yet available, as tax returns for 2012 were only due to be filed in late 2013 and data are still being processed.

Revenue Commissioners Investigations

Questions (159)

James Bannon

Question:

159. Deputy James Bannon asked the Minister for Finance if the Revenue Commissioners will reconsider a case (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16744/14]

View answer

Written answers

The Finance Acts provide the legal framework for offences of the nature referred to by the Deputy, but it is a matter for the Revenue Commissioners to determine the action that should be taken in individual cases.

I am advised that the Commissioners' practice is not to offer a compromise settlement where class 3 category vehicles are involved, unless there are exceptional mitigating circumstances to be taken into consideration.  I understand the vehicle in this instance was determined to be a Heavy Commercial Vehicle which is categorised as a class 3 vehicle. Revenue is not aware of any exceptional mitigating circumstances in this case.

The individual will of course have the opportunity to present his case during the legal proceedings and it will be a matter for the Courts to finally determine the matter.

If the Deputy is in a position to supply further details about the related case to which he referred, the Revenue Commissioners will look into the matter further.

 

Living City Initiative

Questions (160)

Seán Kyne

Question:

160. Deputy Seán Kyne asked the Minister for Finance the progress of the consultations to determine the areas to be included in the living cities initiative in each of the four cities involved; the status of the application to seek state aid approval; and the way applications are to be made under the initiative. [16768/14]

View answer

Written answers

Officials from my Department have held preliminary discussions with the relevant local authorities to identify the areas of the six cities, Cork, Dublin, Galway, Kilkenny, Limerick and Waterford, which might fall within the scope of the scheme. Each of the local authorities have now submitted proposals on the areas which they believe should be included. Further discussions will be held in due course.

An application for EU State Aid approval was submitted on 27th March and we look forward to hearing from the European Commission.

The principle of how applications would be made under the scheme are set down in the legislation, which sets out, for example, a general "pre" and "post" inspection process by the local authorities to ensure that work conforms to local planning rules etc. However, the specific method of making applications will be finalised following further discussions with the local authorities and the Revenue Commissioners.

Economic Data

Questions (161)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

161. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Finance the extent to which the quarterly Exchequer returns are in accord with expectations with particular reference to the post-bailout environment; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16793/14]

View answer

Written answers

The end-March 2014 Exchequer returns and associated information is available on my Department's website on the following link: 

http://www.finance.gov.ie/what-we-do/public-finances/exchequer-returns/exchequer-returns

Overall, the tax performance for the first quarter of the year is broadly in line with expectations, with tax revenues coming in at €257 million which equates to a 2.9% excess against profile. 

In relation to expenditure, net voted expenditure was €261 million or 2.5% below profile and is on target and in line with expectations.  

Although, this is a solid start to 2014, we have to continue to reduce our level of spending and increase the amount of revenue collected in order to close that gap further and ensure public finance sustainability.  

Economic Data

Questions (162, 163, 164, 165)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

162. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Finance the extent to which his Department continues to monitor economic activity with particular reference to identification of specific areas of inflation likely to impact negatively on the economy; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16794/14]

View answer

Bernard Durkan

Question:

163. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Finance if he and his Department continue to study the various segments of the economy with a view to ensuring growth with a minimum of inflation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16797/14]

View answer

Bernard Durkan

Question:

164. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Finance the extent to which he and his Department have noted house price inflation; if such a trend is likely to cause economic disruption; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16798/14]

View answer

Bernard Durkan

Question:

165. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Finance if he is satisfied regarding the performance of all aspects of the economy in the post-bailout period; if he has in mind any corrective measures; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16799/14]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 162 to 165, inclusive, together.

In my Budget day speech in October of last year I outlined the Government's approach to restoring the economy to sustainable growth. This programme involves inter alia a sector-by-sector approach, where the Government looked to build on areas of strength of the economy and repair those sectors which were damaged. I am pleased to report that this approach has proven successful, with some noticeable gains recorded in some of the economy s key sectors over the last year.

Looking first at the agri-food and fisheries sector, which is Ireland s largest indigenous industry and a significant contributor to employment, 2013 proved a very successful year for the sector with strong employment growth over the year. Exports (in value terms) related to the agricultural sector increased by 7 per cent in 2013 and year-to-date outturn figures combined with the continued signs of recovery in key trading partners such as the UK augur well for further growth in 2014.

Another jobs-rich sector, which suffered greatly due to the global economic downturn, and one to which the Government has introduced a series of targeted policy initiatives, has been tourism. Last year was particularly strong for the tourism sector, with overseas trips to Ireland increasing by 7 per cent in annual terms. This was aided by the reduced VAT rate for products and services in place since July 2011, as well as by The Gathering, which contributed to a 14 per cent increase in tourism from North America in 2013. Encouragingly, the growth we have seen in the number of visitors to Ireland has also been reflected in the employment gains in the sector, with employment in accommodation and food services up by 13 per cent in the final quarter of 2013 when compared with the same period in 2011 after the VAT reduction was introduced. Another positive point is that the strong momentum gained in 2013 looks to have carried over into this year, with trips to Ireland up 11.3 per cent for the period December 2013 to February 2014 in year-on-year terms.

 Of course, no sector was hit harder in the recession than the construction sector and while nobody wishes to see a return to the construction-reliant economy that preceded the downturn, some recovery in the sector is vital to support wider economic growth. On this front recent developments have been positive, with signs of a recovery in the sector following nearly six years of continuous decline. Employment in the sector has now stabilised while national accounts data show building and construction investment increasing by 12 per cent in 2013.

National residential property prices have begun to recover, having fallen 51 per cent from peak to trough. While this has largely been driven by a recovery in property prices in Dublin, prices outside of the capital now appear to have bottomed out and were up by 4.2 per cent over the year to February. As part of Budget 2014 I introduced measures to address the limitations of supply of suitable housing stock that seem to be impacting the Dublin market, including the extension of the Living City Initiative and the Home Renovation Initiative.  The Government s Medium-Term Economic Strategy for the period 2014-2020 set out the intention to address remaining challenges in the construction sector. As part of this the Government will be publishing a strategy for a renewed construction sector in the near future.

In terms of overall price developments, the Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices (HICP) the comparative measurement of inflation across Europe  increased by 0.5 per cent in Ireland for 2013 as a whole. The energy effect that was so pronounced in 2012 was not present in 2013, which was the predominant driver of the lower headline HICP over the year.

In February, annual HICP inflation was 0.1 per cent as energy and unprocessed food continued to act as a drag on inflation. Stripping out these two elements, core inflation measured 0.7 per cent which compares with a figure of 1.1 per cent for the euro area as a whole.

Irish core inflation has now been below, or on par with, euro area inflation for every month since February 2009. This has led to significant cost competitiveness gains over this period, while also serving to protect real incomes. Inflationary pressures are expected to remain relatively muted once again this year. Revised forecasts will be published in the Stability Programme Update to be published later this month.   

Bank Charges

Questions (166)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

166. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Finance the extent to which he and his Department continue to monitor the levels of bank charges being imposed by various banks; the basis for such charges, nationally and internationally; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16800/14]

View answer

Written answers

 I, as Minister for Finance have no role in the regulation of bank charges in Ireland. As the Deputy is aware, bank fees, charges  and commissions are subject to regulation under Section 149 of the Consumer Credit Act 1995, as amended. Section 149 came into effect in 1996 and currently requires that credit institutions, prescribed credit institutions and bureaux de change must make an  application to the Central Bank if they wish to introduce a new customer charge or increase any existing customer charge in respect of certain services. Section 149 does not apply to interest rates; it applies to fees, charges  and commissions only.

The basis for setting bank charges, both nationally and internationally, is based on a number of factors and is at the commercial discretion of the bank.

As required by the Troika, my Department published a review of the regulation of bank fees and charges; the review is available on the website www.finance.gov.ie.

The review found that:

- net fee and commission income divided by average assets in Irish banks was well below the average of their peers; and

- net fee and commission are lower in the Irish banks than in their European peers relative to net interest income.

The review concluded that it would not be appropriate to repeal Section 149 at this time. The lack of competition in the banking sector means that the repeal of section 149 would give unfettered price setting power to the incumbent banks.  The report recommends that this issue should be revisited when competition in the banking sector has improved significantly.  It is my view that the current regulatory regime offers appropriate protection to consumers against unjustified increases in bank fees and commissions.

Question No. 167 answered with Question No. 32.
Question No. 168 answered with Question No. 155.

Credit Availability

Questions (169, 171)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

169. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Finance the degree to which Government policy towards assisting small and medium-sized enterprises by way of enhanced lending for working capital or other purposes has been successful to date; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16803/14]

View answer

Bernard Durkan

Question:

171. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Finance the extent to which he expects credit, including working capital, to be made available by the lending institutions to small and medium-sized enterprises; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16821/14]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 169 and 171 together.

 As the Deputy is aware, as part of the 2011 recapitalisation exercise, the Government imposed SME lending targets on AIB and Bank of Ireland for the three calendar years, 2011 to 2013. Each bank was required to sanction lending of at least €3 billion in 2011, €3.5 billion last year and €4 billion in 2013 for new or increased credit facilities, including working capital, to SMEs. Both banks have achieved their lending targets.

The credit review process remains available to any SMEs whose credit has been reduced or withdrawn by AIB or Bank of Ireland as well as when credit is refused by them. I would strongly advise any SME whose credit is reduced or withdrawn to avail of the services of the Credit Review Office.

Action Plan for Jobs 2014 contains a range of actions to encourage access to credit for SMEs and enhance the measurement and reporting by the banks of their lending to the sector. These include:

- Work with KfW and the German Ministry of Finance to develop an initiative that will improve funding mechanisms for SMEs.

- Detailed data from AIB and Bank of Ireland will be collated and examined, on a monthly basis ensuring a more informed understanding of the SME bank lending environment, with a particular focus on new lending.                                       

- The SME State Bodies Group will be rolling out a comprehensive communications strategy to ensure that SMEs are aware of the State supports for which they may be eligible, which may include supports for working capital purposes.

In addition, the SME Funding Consultation Committee, chaired by the Department of Finance, provides a forum for consultation with stakeholders around Government policy regarding the provision of credit to SMEs.

Top
Share