Skip to main content
Normal View

Tuesday, 7 Oct 2014

Written Answers Nos. 154 - 175

Customs and Excise Protocols

Questions (154)

Sandra McLellan

Question:

154. Deputy Sandra McLellan asked the Minister for Finance if his attention has been drawn to the fact that Customs and Excise staff are damaging people's cars that have anti-stifling devices when they dip for diesel; if the Revenue Commissioners will indemnify car owners whose cars are damaged by this practice; if he has plans to instruct manufacturers to insert a connection point in engines to enable customs take a sample; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37803/14]

View answer

Written answers

The use of marked diesel in a motor vehicle is an offence under section 102(1) (b) of the Finance Act 1999 and a person convicted of that offence is liable to a fine of €5,000.

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners, who are responsible for tackling fuel fraud, that checking the fuel in vehicles is an important means of acting against this offence, and that this requires the taking of a sample of fuel for analysis.

I understand also that  Revenue staff make every effort to ensure that the taking of a fuel sample is conducted in a way that avoids any damage to the motor vehicle concerned, and that there have been only a small number of instances in which complaints have been made to Revenue that  damage was caused by sample-taking. In the event that it was established that damage occurred because of sample-taking, it would be open to the owner of the vehicle concerned to make a claim for compensation.

Revenue is aware that changes to motor vehicles may require the adoption, for some vehicles, of modified means of sample-taking, and will make every effort to ensure that it can be carried out as safely and as effectively as possible in all cases. However, requiring the installation of a connection point in engines is not considered to be feasible.

I would point out also that a range of other actions are being taken against the use of marked diesel in motor vehicles, by strengthening the control and supervision of the fuel supply chain. Measures that have been put in place include additional obligations in respect of the holding and movement of fuel, and a requirement for dealers in marked fuel to have a licence to engage in that business. In addition, all fuel traders are required to make electronic monthly returns of their transactions to Revenue. These measures will restrict the availability of marked fuel for use in motor vehicles.

Universal Social Charge Application

Questions (155, 161, 162, 164)

Thomas P. Broughan

Question:

155. Deputy Thomas P. Broughan asked the Minister for Finance if he will provide in tabular form the estimated cost to the Exchequer of increasing the entry point at which a person is liable for the universal social charge from €10,036 to €11,000, €12,000, €13,000, €14,000, €15,000 and €16,000. [37809/14]

View answer

Thomas P. Broughan

Question:

161. Deputy Thomas P. Broughan asked the Minister for Finance if he will provide in tabular form the cost to the Exchequer of decreasing each of the rates of the universal social charge by 0.25%, 0.5%, 0.75% and 1%, respectively. [37908/14]

View answer

Thomas P. Broughan

Question:

162. Deputy Thomas P. Broughan asked the Minister for Finance the cost to the Exchequer of continuing the exemption from the top rate of the universal social charge for those on medical cards where the medical card holders in question have aggregate income which does not exceed €60,000 per annum. [37909/14]

View answer

Thomas P. Broughan

Question:

164. Deputy Thomas P. Broughan asked the Minister for Finance the cost or yield to the Exchequer of equalising the treatment of public sector and private sector pensions in terms of the determination of liability for the universal social charge. [37912/14]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 155, 161, 162 and 164 together.

In relation to the questions regarding the cost of various changes to prevailing USC rates, I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that the Budget 2015 Ready Reckoner, available on the Commissioners' website at http://www.revenue.ie/en/about/statistics/index.html, shows a number of indicative changes to Universal Social Charge (USC) rates and thresholds. While the Ready Reckoner does not show all of the specific costings requested by the Deputy, other changes can be estimated broadly on a pro-rata basis with those displayed in the Reckoner.

In relation to the question regarding the exemption from the 7% rate of USC for medical card holders with an aggregate income below €60,000, the Revenue Commissioners have informed me that they tentatively estimate, by reference to 2015 incomes, that the full year cost of retaining the exemption is €115m. 

As regards the question concerning the USC treatment of pensions, I would inform the Deputy that public and private sector occupational pensions are treated the same for USC purposes. However, payments made by the Department of Social Protection, including pensions, are exempt from USC.

Property Tax Deferrals

Questions (156)

Clare Daly

Question:

156. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Finance the options open to a couple who were denied an income based deferral for the local property tax on the grounds that they did not live in their property, even though their sole income is disability allowance and the property is in negative equity. [37827/14]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that, without further details of the particular circumstances in this case,  including whether there is rental income, it is difficult to provide a reply to the Deputy.

By way of general information, sections 132 and 133 of the Finance (Local Property Tax) Act 2012 (as amended) provides for a system of deferral arrangements for owner-occupiers based on certain income thresholds. These thresholds can be adjusted upwards by taking into account 80% of any gross mortgage interest payments. A couple whose only income source is a Department of Social Protection (DSP) payment, and who are occupying their property as their sole or main residence, would qualify for deferral. Unfortunately, as the Deputy has stated that the couple are not living in their property, they would not qualify for the normal income based deferral.  The various phased payment options are available to them.

In  the Finance (Local Property Tax) (Amendment) Act 2013 I included a provision in section 13(d) of the Act that allows a deferral of the Local Property Tax (LPT) charge that is not restricted to owner-occupiers.  This deferral option applies where a property owner suffers an unexpected and unavoidable significant financial loss or expense as a result of which they are unable to pay their LPT, or maintain phased payment arrangements, without causing excessive financial hardship.  Full information on applying for this deferral option, and of the conditions involved, is available from the Revenue Commissioners' website at http://www.revenue.ie/en/tax/lpt/deferring-payment.html.

Revenue Commissioners Expenditure

Questions (157)

Seán Kenny

Question:

157. Deputy Seán Kenny asked the Minister for Finance his plans to provide funding for the purchase of an additional customs cutter for the Revenue Commissioners; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37834/14]

View answer

Written answers

I am informed by Revenue that it currently has two Customs Cutters in service. The cost and adequacy of the present level of provision is continually reviewed. Revenue is satisfied that it has an effective service that meets its foreseeable needs and the acquisition of additional vessels is not under active consideration by Revenue at this time.

Tax Code

Questions (158)

Michael Healy-Rae

Question:

158. Deputy Michael Healy-Rae asked the Minister for Finance his plans to reverse the excise increase (details supplied) to support the tourism industry and small business owners; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37847/14]

View answer

Written answers

It is not my practice to comment on what measures may or may not be introduced in advance of the Budget.

Tax Relief Application

Questions (159)

Michael Creed

Question:

159. Deputy Michael Creed asked the Minister for Finance if he will quantify the level of take-up of the rent-a-room relief whereby a room may be rented in a private house for up to €10,000 tax free; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37886/14]

View answer

Written answers

Section 216A of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 provides for the rent-a-room scheme. This scheme was introduced in Finance Act 2001 as an incentive to encourage individuals to let rooms in their principal private residence in order to bring about an increase in the availability of rental accommodation, particularly for the student sector.

The scheme provides an exemption from Income Tax, PRSI and USC on rent received where a person rents out a room or rooms in his or her principal private residence and the rent received does not exceed €10,000 per year. This was increased from €7,620 in Budget 2008.

In order to qualify for the exemption, it is necessary for the residential premises to be situated in the State and occupied by the individual as his or her sole or main residence during the tax year.

The relief only applies to individuals. It does not apply to companies or partnerships. In addition, an individual cannot avail of the relief in respect of payments for accommodation in the family home by a child of the individual. There is no restriction where rent is paid by other family members, for example, nieces or nephews.

The latest figures available relate to the tax year 2012 when the cost of the relief was estimated at €6 million and was availed of by 4,070 claimants. This equates to rental income of approximately €23 million.

Banking Sector Redundancies

Questions (160)

Joanna Tuffy

Question:

160. Deputy Joanna Tuffy asked the Minister for Finance if he will provide an update on the outsourcing of customer services employment by Allied Irish Banks; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37897/14]

View answer

Written answers

As the Deputy will be aware under the Relationship Framework the State does not intervene in the day to day operations of the bank or their management decisions regarding commercial matters. AIB has previously indicated that as part of its restructuring plan to reduce costs and increase efficiencies, outsourcing of certain functions would be considered in consultation with unions and affected staff. I have also been informed by the bank that there have been no compulsory redundancies as a result of its recent outsourcing activities.

Questions Nos. 161 and 162 answered with Question No. 155.

Tax Code

Questions (163)

Thomas P. Broughan

Question:

163. Deputy Thomas P. Broughan asked the Minister for Finance if his Department has reviewed the working paper by an organisation (details supplied) in relation to the introduction of a wealth tax; his views on the estimated yield which could be achieved from the imposition of a wealth tax as proposed in the working paper. [37910/14]

View answer

Written answers

As the Deputy is aware, it is a longstanding practice of the Minister for Finance not to comment, in advance of the Budget, on any tax matters that may or may not be the subject of Budget decisions. 

The paper to which the Deputy refers, did not advocate a specific form of wealth tax but analysed a number of options and discussed issues relating to the introduction of a wealth tax. While it concluded that there was a strong case for broadening the tax base to include an annual wealth tax, it also noted that there was no consensus in academic literature about the value of wealth taxes.

The paper suggested that a yield of 0.1% of GDP which would be in the region of €160 million was attainable from an annual wealth tax where the net wealth threshold of liability is set at €1 million and the tax rate is set at 0.6%.  However, as I have stated in reply to a number of Parliamentary Questions in the past, in order to estimate the potential revenue from a tax on wealth, one would need to identify the wealth held by individuals, which is not possible from the data available at present.

It should also be noted that wealth can be taxed in a variety of ways, some of which already exist in Ireland.  Capital Gains Tax (CGT) and Capital Acquisitions Tax (CAT) are, in effect, taxes on wealth, in that they are levied on an individual or company on the disposal of an asset (CGT) or the acquisition of an asset through gift or inheritance (CAT). However, they are not annual taxes on an individual's wealth.  Deposit Interest Retention Tax (DIRT) is charged at 41%, with limited exemptions, on interest earned on deposit accounts.  Local Property Tax (LPT) introduced in 2013 is a tax based on the market value of residential properties.  The Domicile Levy introduced in Budget 2010 also constitutes a form of wealth tax.  The combined yield of these taxes considerably exceeds, on an annual basis, that of the measures considered in the Report.

Question No. 164 answered with Question No. 155.

Fuel Oil Specifications

Questions (165)

Seamus Kirk

Question:

165. Deputy Seamus Kirk asked the Minister for Finance the measures that are being put in place to counteract petrol stretching fuel contamination; if his attention has been drawn to the serious financial implications for drivers who unwittingly purchase the product; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37915/14]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that they have received a number of reports of problems relating to petrol quality from around the country in recent weeks.  In general, such reports are followed up as a matter of course and samples sent to the State Laboratory for analysis where officers have reason to suspect Excise Duty fraud.  The recent reports of suspected petrol "stretching" are being investigated by the Revenue Commissioners who have been in contact with the Oil and Motor trade in this regard. 

Any illegal activity, such as petrol stretching, would be a matter of serious concern because of the risks to the Exchequer, the threat to legitimate businesses and the damage that can be caused to the vehicles of unsuspecting purchasers of adulterated fuel.  Section 102(1A) of the Finance Act 1999 makes it an offence to sell, deliver or use oil on which Mineral Oil Tax at the appropriate rate has not been paid.  In the normal course of work, Revenue's enforcement staff take samples of fuel from mineral oil suppliers, including filling stations, to ensure compliance with mineral oil regulations. These samples are sent to the State Laboratory for scientific analysis. If the results of the analysis reveals the presence of any illegal stretching agents, I can assure the Deputy that the Revenue Commissioners will take action and pursue prosecutions against offenders where possible.

Revenue and the oil sector have cooperated very successfully to tackle diesel laundering and I am confident that with this cooperation, and with the supply chain information available to Revenue, the problem of petrol stretching can also be tackled successfully. In this regard it is essential that petrol distributors report on any reduction in the pattern of legitimate supplies of fuel to the retail trade which may indicate that specific retailers are shifting some of their sourcing to laundered or 'stretched' fuel. 

Motorists themselves should take care about where they source their petrol from, and report any suspicions concerning the source of adulterated petrol that may have damaged their engines to Revenue. Revenue will investigate such reports and pursue prosecutions against offenders where possible. In that regard, Revenue has recently launched a dedicated section of its website specifically on the shadow economy and this includes an electronic reporting facility for anyone who has information about shadow economy practices such as petrol stretching.

The first point of contact for motorists whose vehicles have been affected should be the insurance companies they hold their policies with.  Further to that, those affected should also contact the point of purchase and seek redress through them.  If they remain unsatisfied they may have recourse to civil remedies and as such could seek legal advice.

Water Charges Introduction

Questions (166)

Michael McGrath

Question:

166. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the financial implications for the Exchequer if Irish Water were not to charge domestic consumers for water use; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37932/14]

View answer

Written answers

Irish Water has introduced water charges for domestic customers to fund expenditure on the treatment and provision of water services. The monies raised by water charges will be received by Irish Water, which is a not part of general government. As such, these receipts do not count as general government revenue and accordingly will not impact on the deficit. 

In the event that Irish Water did not charge domestic consumers for water use, a number of issues would arise. The first point that would need to be considered is the proposed level of expenditure on water services and how to fund it. Any decisions on Exchequer expenditure on the provision of water services would be a matter for the Minister for Environment, Local Government and Community and the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform.

The second issue is that the absence of water charges revenue would have to be taken into account by the Central Statistics Office in the statistical classification of Irish Water. If it was classified within general government, all its revenue and expenditure would impact on the general government deficit and its debt would count as general government debt.

Question No. 167 answered with Question No. 150.

Tax Relief Availability

Questions (168)

Michael Lowry

Question:

168. Deputy Michael Lowry asked the Minister for Finance the steps he will take to ease the financial burden for graduate entry medicine students and graduates by introducing tax relief on repayments of approved loan products for these students and graduates; if his attention has been drawn to the fact that these students and graduates simply cannot survive on the current non-consultant hospital doctor, NCHD, starting salary once their loans repayments have been made; if his attention has been drawn to the hardship and distress being caused as a result; if his attention has been drawn to the fact that this debt is driving young doctors out of the country; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37971/14]

View answer

Written answers

The graduate entry medical programme provides undergraduate medical education of four years duration and has been developed to produce medical graduates with the ability to successfully undertake an internship and thereafter to gain full registration with the Medical Council. The programme is supported by a combination of student fees, State funding and other income.  

While in this case the fees could be considered high, in the majority of cases where third level tuition fees are payable they are at much lower levels.  In addition, those participating in the programme must already have acquired an undergraduate degree, the fees for which would have been covered by the State in the vast majority of cases.

I would point out that tax relief at the standard rate of 20% is available in respect of qualifying fees paid by an individual for a third level education course, including a postgraduate course.   

Qualifying fees mean tuition fees in respect of an approved course at an approved college and includes what is referred to as the "student contribution".  No other fees e.g. administration fees, examination fees, capitation fees, qualify for tax relief.  Tuition fees that are, or will be, met directly or indirectly by grant, scholarship, employer contribution or other means are deducted in arriving at the net qualifying fees. A claim for relief may be made in respect of a number of students. 

In making a claim for relief for the tax year 2014, the maximum amount of fees that can qualify for the relief is €7,000 per student, but an amount set out in the legislation must be disregarded from each claim (whether in respect of one or more students).  Where a claim for relief includes fees paid on behalf of at least one full-time student, the disregard is €2,750.

 Where a claim for relief includes fees solely paid on behalf of a part-time student or part-time students, the amount disregarded is €1,375.  Thus, for example, an individual undertaking a graduate entry medical course on a full-time basis, where tuition fees of €15,000 per student apply, would attract relief of €850 made up as follows:

-

Tuition fees

€15,000

Capped at

€7,000

Less

€2,750

€4,250 @ 20% = €850

It is a longstanding practice of the Minister for Finance not to comment, in advance of the Budget, on any tax matters that might be the subject of Budget decisions. However, as with all tax reliefs, the introduction of tax relief for loans taken out to pursue the graduate entry medical programme will be considered in the context of the forthcoming Budget and Finance Bill and any announcements will be made on Budget Day.

Mortgage Schemes

Questions (169)

Terence Flanagan

Question:

169. Deputy Terence Flanagan asked the Minister for Finance his views on correspondence (details supplied) regarding lending; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37982/14]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised by the Central Bank of Ireland that banks employ both Loan-to-Value (LTV) and Net Disposable Income (NDI) benchmarks as part of the initial assesment of mortgage loan applications. The LTV maximum tends to be at 90% and the mortgage to NDI no more than 35%.  In addition, banks require detailed income and expenditure disclosure which they examine carefully and then apply a stress test for changes to interest rates.

In assessing affordability of credit, the Consumer Protection Code requires lenders to, inter alia, carry out an assessment of affordability which must include the consumer's ability to afford a 2% interest rate increase above the interest rate offered.  Therefore, in line with Central Bank guidance, new lending decisions are primarily based on assessment of affordability rather than LTV.

From a prudential perspective, the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) has been leading the work in developing macro-prudential frameworks across the EU.  This is being done through its recommendations of 2011 (on national macro-prudential mandates) and 2013 (on the intermediate objectives and instruments of macro-prudential policy). In a recent publication, the ESRB identified loan-to-income and debt service-to-income caps as potential instruments in addressing excessive credit growth.

In addition, the Central Bank very recently published research which examines the use of limits on new lending at high loan-to-value (LTV) or loan-to-income (LTI) ratios as macro-prudential tools which can be used to make the financial system safer and less prone to crises. As the Deputy may be aware, the Governor of the Central Bank yesterday announced that the Central Bank intends to introduce some measures on the adoption of appropriate macro prudential tools in the context of the Irish mortgage market. These include proposed LTV and LTI measures, which will assist the regulator in maintaining and underpining financial stability.

Revenue Commissioners Expenditure

Questions (170)

Terence Flanagan

Question:

170. Deputy Terence Flanagan asked the Minister for Finance his views on a matter regarding the Revenue Commissioners (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37983/14]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that they implemented their current telephone system for callers to the PAYE 1890 lo-call service in 2005. 

Revenue uses an automated voice recognition service to collect the customer's PPS Number which has on average a 90% success rate at identifying the spoken PPS Number.  While every effort has been made to tune and refine the system to deal with all accents and inflections there are however times when it cannot recognise the number that is being spoken. The system will make several attempts to get the customer to repeat their PPS Number and after four unsuccessful attempts will place the customer directly in the queue for an operator.  Most unsuccessful attempts are usually due to background noise or bad quality telephony reception while the PPS Number is being spoken.

Revenue is constantly monitoring the performance of its voice activated service and looks to improve the quality of the customer's experience over the telephone.  I am further advised that when resources permit, Revenue will seek to invest further in their telephony system as it is now almost ten years old.

Regarding the length of time in the queue, this will always depend on the number of customers using the service at the time.  I am advised by the Commissioners that the average time in queue for the PAYE 1890 service is less than 6 minutes and not 20 minutes as stated in the details supplied.  The Commissioners further advise that at certain times, the wait time is significantly less than the average but they acknowledge that at certain peak times, the wait time can be longer. 

In order to manage the high volume of calls at peak times and to reduce the number of calls to operators, I am informed that Revenue also offers a variety of self-service options over the telephone to callers before they are connected to speak to an operator.  The self-service options include, inter alia, requesting the most popular forms and leaflets and finding out the status of any refund claims the caller may have submitted.  Unless the caller provides their PPS Number, the self-service options are not available.  An added benefit of the system capturing the caller's spoken PPS Number is that their call is routed directly to the correct office that is responsible for handling their call, thereby resulting overall in a speedier response.

I am also advised that, as is the norm with lo-call telephone numbers, the cost of a call is shared equally between the caller and Revenue.  The caller's telecommunications provider is the recipient of the call charge.

In addition to the 1890 services, the vast majority of routine Revenue enquiries can be answered by reference to comprehensive information leaflets, the PAYE Anytime Service and the Revenue On-Line Service (ROS) for business taxes.  All of these services are available at www.revenue.ie.

Mortgage Arrears Report Implementation

Questions (171)

John Browne

Question:

171. Deputy John Browne asked the Minister for Finance if he will provide the breakdown of appeal categories in the independent Office of the Financial Services Ombudsman in respect of the number and percentage relating to code of conduct on mortgage arrears or mortgage arrears resolution process complaints, insurance companies, and so on in the period 2011 to 2014; if he will also provide the number of appeals and the equivalent percentage of each appeal category where the finding was upheld, partly upheld or not upheld; his views on the mediation option applying to the Financial Services Ombudsman not being accepted by financial institutions; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37986/14]

View answer

Written answers

Firstly, I must point out that the Financial Services Ombudsman is independent in the carrying out of his duties.  I have no role in the day to day workings of the office.

However, the Financial Services Ombudsman has informed me that the information requested by the Deputy is as follows:-

Information regarding Mortgage Arrears Resolution Process (MARP) complaints for the period 01/01/11 to 03/10/14

Total Complaints received:

MARP:

% of Total:

2011: 7,230

21

0.29%

2012: 7,287

105

1.4%

2013: 8,135

565

7%

2014: 3,584

375 

10 %

 

Total MARP: 1,066

 

MARP Findings:

Upheld: 

Partially Upheld:  

Not upheld:

2011: No Finding issued

No Finding issued

No Finding issued

2012: 0 (0%)

5 (45%)

6 (55%)

(Total Findings 11)

2013: 1 (2%)

14 (20%)

54 (78%)

(Total Findings 69)

2014 (to 3rd October): 2 (3%)

19 (23%)

61 (74%)

(Total Findings 82)

It should be noted that the Code of Conduct on Mortgage Arrears (CCMA) process only came into effect on 1 January 2011. By mid to late 2011 the Financial Services Ombudsman Bureau started to receive complaints regarding alleged breaches of the Code and therefore, it was early 2012 before findings were issued.

I have been further advised by the Financial Services Ombudsman that in respect of all cases the Financial Services Ombudsman's Bureau offers mediation to the complainant and the provider.

On the issue more generally, both parties to the complaint must be willing and must elect to participate in mediation before it can take place. If one of the parties wants to mediate the complaint and the other does not, then no mediation will take place and the matter will proceed to investigation and adjudication.

In 2013 no mediations took place in relation to mortgage arrears.

Bank Debt Restructuring

Questions (172, 173, 174, 175)

Stephen Donnelly

Question:

172. Deputy Stephen S. Donnelly asked the Minister for Finance further to the recent announcement by PTSB that it had disposed of €215 million of loans secured by mortgages on buy to let property in the UK, in a portfolio known as Project Liverpool, if he will confirm the par value of the loans sold; the book value of the loans as at 30 June 2014; the sale price of the loans; the buyer of the loans; the additional terms that are relevant to the taxpayer who is ultimately the owner of PTSB; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37993/14]

View answer

Stephen Donnelly

Question:

173. Deputy Stephen S. Donnelly asked the Minister for Finance the position regarding the continuing involvement of Capital Home Loans, the 100% PTSB-owned UK subsidiary in the management of the €215 million of buy-to-let mortgages recently disposed of; the rationale for the continuing involvement; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37994/14]

View answer

Stephen Donnelly

Question:

174. Deputy Stephen S. Donnelly asked the Minister for Finance further to the recent announcement by PTSB that it had disposed of €215 million in loans secured by mortgages on buy-to-let property in the UK, in a portfolio known as Project Liverpool, if he will provide the costs incurred by PTSB in preparing the portfolio for sale, and in marketing, legal and advisory services linked to the sale; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37995/14]

View answer

Stephen Donnelly

Question:

175. Deputy Stephen S. Donnelly asked the Minister for Finance if in 2012, when PTSB was attempting to dispose of the British Capital Home Loans business, it was offering loans in tranches of a size similar to the €215 million disposal announced last week; his views that there are lessons to be learned from offering smaller loan tranches to the market in order to maximise disposal proceeds. [37996/14]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 172 to 175, inclusive, together.

I have been informed that there was no tranche similar in size to the €215 million tranche sold on 26 September 2014, offered for sale in 2011/2012.  As you will recall the requirement under the Central Bank's Prudential Liquidity Assessment Review (PLAR) issued in March 2011 was to sell the whole of the CHL portfolio by the end of 2013. While circumstances are now different, it is a matter for PTSB and its advisors to assess the market for the disposal of assets at that time and develop an appropriate sales strategy to reflect current market conditions. 

PTSB has issued an announcement in relation to the sale of a tranche of CHL loans, with a par value of £173 million (€215m), and for confidentiality and commercial reasons they have not released any further details relating to the transaction including, but not limited to the buyer, the price achieved and the costs of the transaction.   

Also the Deputy may be aware, under the Relationship Framework, the board and management teams of PTSB retain the responsibility and the authority for determining the strategy and commercial decisions and conducting the day to day operations, including the sale of assets. In making such decisions the Board and management teams are highly conscious of ensuring that sale costs are minimised and that maximum proceeds are achieved in the sale of all loan portfolios.

In relation to the continuing involvement of CHL in the management of the loans post sale, I have been informed it is for commercial purposes to facilitate the sale to a buyer who does not have a servicing platform in the UK. I refer to the press release made by PTSB where they state that "as part of the transaction CHL will continue to service the Project Liverpool loans under a separate commercial arrangement".

Top
Share