Skip to main content
Normal View

Wednesday, 3 Dec 2014

Written Answers Nos. 1-28

Property Tax Rate

Questions (6)

Alan Farrell

Question:

6. Deputy Alan Farrell asked the Minister for Finance his views on introducing additional legislation or a ministerial order on or before the revaluation date for the local property tax for the purposes of ensuring that Dublin and regional cities are not overly burdened with property tax in view of the prices in the capital and regional cities rising at a far higher rate than the 15% discount available to local authority members; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45969/14]

View answer

Written answers

As the Local Property Tax is a new tax, the Government wished to provide certainty to homeowners and for this reason valuation periods of three years were introduced (with the exception of the first valuation period which covers three and a half years). In addition to providing certainty, it also eases the administration burden on the homeowner by not having to revalue their houses each year.  

The regular revaluation periods ensure that the property register is maintained with accurate and up to date information to assist in evaluating the operation of LPT, as well as bringing newly built properties within the scope of LPT.  The Deputy may be aware that under the LPT legislation, where a property is not a "relevant residential property" on a valuation date (i.e. not liable to LPT), with certain exceptions, that property will not be a relevant residential property until the next valuation date. In the interests of equity to compliant LPT payers it is important to have regular valuation dates so that newly built properties are brought into the LPT net. It also provides certainty to those homeowners as to when they will become liable to LPT. 

The initial valuation of a property on 1 May 2013, assuming it was made in good faith, is valid from 1 May 2013 to 31 October 2016, and will not be affected by any increase or decrease in property prices or other changes, including repairs or improvements made, during this period. I also committed not to amend the central national rate of LPT for the lifetime of the Government.  

While I am very conscious of the concerns of homeowners over increasing property prices and the effects this will have on their LPT liabilities, particularly in urban areas, the next valuation date is not until 1 November 2016. In advance of that date, in conjunction with my officials, I will be examining the LPT and impacts on LPT liabilities due to increasing property prices.

Questions Nos. 7 to 10, inclusive, answered orally.

Tax Data

Questions (11)

Peadar Tóibín

Question:

11. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Finance if he will provide in tabular form the annual number of registrations for relevant contract tax refused by the Revenue Commissioners between 2008 and 2014. [45935/14]

View answer

Written answers

I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that every principal contractor who enters into a contract with a sub-contractor in relation to construction, forestry or meat processing operations is obliged to register as a principal contractor for RCT.  Sub-contractors, who are not already registered for RCT, will be automatically registered for RCT on foot of a contract notification from a principal contractor.

I am also advised that refusing to register a principal or sub-contractor for RCT purposes will generally not arise as this is a necessary prerequisite to enable a principal or a sub-contractor comply with their RCT obligations. 

I have previously dealt with Questions from the Deputy in relation to the numbers of sub-contractors in the State and the numbers registered for Relevant Contracts Tax (RCT) in Question No. 202 of 25 November 2014 (Ref. 45172/14) and Question No. 215 of 2 December 2014 (Ref. 46181/14). My reply to Question No. 312 of 4 November 2014 (Re. 41524/14) is also relevant. 

The Deputy may be referring to refusals in the case of sub-contractors where there is possible misclassification of employment (i.e. a "bogus" self-employment).  I am advised that as details of contract offers are not normally available at RCT registration stage, it is not possible for the Revenue Commissioners to make any determination at that point as to the nature or status of any contract, and in these circumstances Revenue is not in a position to refuse any applications for registration on these grounds.

There are safeguards, which have been designed into the electronic RCT system, for those individuals who may have concerns that they are caught up in "bogus self-employment".  Firstly, a principal contractor has a statutory obligation to notify Revenue through the electronic RCT system of details of all contracts entered into with a sub-contractor and secondly, on receipt of these contract details, Revenue issues a "Contract Confirmation" letter directly to the individual who is described by the principal as being the sub-contractor.  On receipt of the "Contract Confirmation" letter, a sub-contractor is obliged to notify Revenue if they believe that they are not a sub-contractor but are more correctly an employee and Revenue will take the necessary steps to investigate the matter.

Revenue is very active in visiting construction sites through its Joint Investigation Units, whose work includes conducting joint operations with officers from NERA and the DSP.  One project that Revenue has a strong focus on is the Department of Education and Skills Capital Programme.  Revenue staff have been involved in over 70 visits to such sites since January 2012 and this work is on-going.

A second additional recent, and on-going, Dublin Region project reviewed 18 publicly funded construction sites ranging in contract size from €1m to €400m, on which in excess of 300 contractors were identified (including approximately 40 non-resident contractors).  Following risk assessment, 51 audits and 20 risk management interventions were opened and to date, 34 audits and all 20 risk management interventions have been completed, with a yield of €749,476. Some non-resident contractors were also appraised and, as a result, a number of audit interventions were opened.

Issues encountered during audit interventions ranged from non-operation (or non-reporting) of the electronic RCT system, inaccurate posting of contracts and payments and workers being paid in cash without any supporting documentation, i.e. payslips, P45s on cessation, etc. 

The Joint Revenue/Department of Social Protection Investigation Unit teams also conducted 30 unannounced visits, concentrating on construction projects with contract values in excess of €5m. A total of 817 workers were interviewed of which 128 (15%) had compliance issues which are being addressed.  Issues encountered were, in the main, employees that had not been registered with Revenue.  The team is currently engaged with 5 sub-contractors who have misclassification (i.e. bogus self-employment) issues with their workers.

The conclusion reached at the interim report stage of this project is that the electronic RCT system has helped to significantly mitigate an area of historically high risk, although some practices including 'cash payments' to employees have persisted.

In conclusion, RCT is designed to ensure tax compliance in the construction and certain other sectors. The question of bogus self-employment in the sector is multi-faceted and is a subject of review by the Department of Social Protection in respect of PRSI, both contributions and benefits, and by NERA in relation to employment rights as well as Revenue in relation to tax issues.  It is important to recognise that a legitimate feature of the construction and certain other sectors is the use of sub-contactors.

Tax Code

Questions (12)

Lucinda Creighton

Question:

12. Deputy Lucinda Creighton asked the Minister for Finance the way he envisages Ireland will compete with the UK in terms of small businesses investment, in view of the success of the enterprise management incentive scheme in the UK; if he sees this scheme as a threat to investment in Irish small and medium enterprises; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43993/14]

View answer

Written answers

Enterprise Management Incentives (EMI) are UK tax advantaged share option schemes designed to help small, higher risk companies to recruit and retain employees.  EMI options can be granted by independent trading companies with gross assets not exceeding £30 million.

Options over shares with an unrestricted market value (UMV) at the date of grant up to £250,000 can be granted.  I understand that there will normally be no income tax or National Insurance Contributions when the options are exercised.

There is no approval process or clearance mechanism for EMI, but a simple requirement on companies to notify HMRC within 92 days of when an EMI option is granted.  In addition, I understand that there is also an annual reporting requirement. This scheme is a form of State Aid, and as a result many trades are excluded.

I do not consider the scheme to be a threat to investment in Irish SMEs. This Government fully supports employee financial participation and provides several schemes to encourage employees to take a share in their employing company, which are not subject to the same limits as the UK scheme.

In Ireland, Revenue Approved Profit Sharing Schemes provide a mechanism whereby a company may allocate shares to its employees.  Under an approved scheme an employee may be allocated shares up to a maximum annual value of €12,700.  The employee is, subject to certain conditions, exempt from the income tax charge that would otherwise arise.  Employee PRSI and USC are, however, chargeable. The participant may be liable to capital gains tax when he/she sells the shares if the disposal proceeds exceed the market value of the shares at the date of allocation and if the total gains are large enough to attract liability.

Since the legislation was introduced in 1982 Revenue has approved 566 schemes although not all are currently active. The estimated cost of approved profit sharing schemes in 2011, the most recent year for which figures are available, is €25.1 million. This relates to 34,477 employees receiving shares worth €81.4 million.

Savings-Related Share Option Schemes provide a mechanism whereby a company may allocate discounted shares to its employees.  An employee is, subject to certain conditions, exempt from the income tax charge on the amount of the discount on the shares allocated to him/her.

There are two elements to a scheme:

(a) A save-as-you earn certified contractual savings scheme, and

(b) An approved share option scheme.

Under the terms of an approved Savings-Related Share Option Scheme, employees are given the right to purchase company shares at a pre-determined price.  The employee enters a savings contract and makes contributions to a certified contractual savings scheme with a qualified savings institution for a designated period of time.  At the end of the savings period the employee can exercise his/her option to acquire shares by using the monies saved over the savings period.  If an employee chooses to exercise his option to acquire shares and the option price is less than the market value of the shares at exercise, the gain/discount is exempt from the charge to income tax.  Employee PRSI and USC are, however, chargeable.

Since the legislation was introduced in 1999 Revenue has approved 162 schemes although not all are currently active. The estimated cost of these schemes in 2012, the most recent year for which figures are available, is €2.6 million which relates to the exercise of 1,942 options at a market value of €20.7 million.

Many companies offer other forms of share based remuneration to employees.  Apart from the two tax-advantaged schemes already mentioned, all other forms of share based remuneration are subject to Income Tax, PRSI and USC either at source, through the PAYE System, or under Self Assessment.  There is no obligation on a Company to notify Revenue of the existence of a share scheme in operation in a company and consequently there are no statistics available in relation to either the number of companies offering share schemes or the number of employees availing of them. As there is no tax relief available for such schemes there is no cost associated with the operation of such schemes.

I would also draw the Deputy's attention to the R&D tax credit which is an important corporation tax support for companies in Ireland.  The central purpose of the R&D tax credit is to encourage companies to undertake high-value add R&D activity in Ireland, thereby supporting jobs and investment here. 

There is an element of the credit, known as the "Key Employee" provision, which was introduced in Finance Act 2012 and allows a company to transfer the tax-free benefit of the R&D tax credit to employees who meet certain conditions.   

The purpose of the measure is to assist companies, particularly small and medium sized companies, to attract and retain key talent i.e. individuals with the requisite skill and experience to work in the field of R&D in the State.  This is a particularly flexible element of the credit that is unique to Ireland.

Tax Data

Questions (13)

Peadar Tóibín

Question:

13. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Finance if he will provide in tabular form the annual tax revenue collected and tax refunds relating to relevant contract tax between 2008 and 2014. [45936/14]

View answer

Written answers

Regarding the annual tax revenue collected and tax refunds relating to Relevant Contracts Tax (RCT) between 2008 and 2014, figures have been provided to me by the Revenue Commissioners.  However, I would like to provide some additional detail to the Deputy regarding RCT generally and the figures supplied.

Firstly, the Deputy will be aware that the primary purpose of the RCT regime is not to generate significant tax yield for the Exchequer.  Instead it provides a mechanism to address tax compliance risks in certain sectors where the practice of sub-contracting activities is a significant feature of the operational model in the sector.  Under RCT, tax deductions at source may apply to payments made in relation to contracts in the construction, forestry and meat processing sectors.

Secondly, where amounts are deducted at source from contract payments made by a principal contractor, these tax deducted amounts are generally not repaid but are instead available for offset by sub-contractors against other tax liabilities that they may have.

As the Deputy has requested information for the period 2008 to 2014, this period covers both the original paper-based Relevant Contracts Tax system and its successor, the electronic Relevant Contracts Tax system, which came into effect on 1 January 2012.  Depending on whether a contract payment was made under the current or the previous system, there are differences in when deduction at source applies and in the quantum of any such deduction.

Prior to the introduction of the electronic Relevant Contracts Tax system in 2012, principal contractors were obliged to deduct tax at 35% on all payments to sub-contractors unless the sub-contractor had a C2 certificate and certain other documentation which allowed the principal to make contract payments gross to the sub-contractor.  At times, this resulted in excessive amounts of tax being withheld which required sub-contractors to claim refunds of these overpayments.  This could be done annually at income tax filing time, or at any time during the tax year as interim refunds were a feature of the old system.

With the electronic RCT system, a sub-contractor is assigned a deduction rate of 0% if their tax affairs are fully compliant, 20% if their tax affairs are substantially compliant, or 35% where the sub-contractor is significantly non-compliant.  

Since the introduction of the new electronic RCT system, the practice of claiming refunds does not generally arise as the new system automatically assigns  a credit of all tax deducted  by principals against the sub-contractors income tax liability and so the figures for repayments includes amounts that have been offset against other tax balances. There are no interim repayments under the eRCT system.

Year

RCT Gross - €m

RCT Repayments/Offsets - €m

RCT Net - €m

2008

826.7

894.0

-67.3

2009

436.5

490.3

-53.9

2010

312.4

321.7

-9.3

2011

267.3

273.4

-6.1

2012

174.3

171.9

2.4

2013

157.0

144.7

12.3

2014 (to end October 2014)

167.1

139.5

27.6

As the Deputy will note from the figures, under the old system pre-2012 it was possible for more monies to be repaid/offset than were collected where a principal contractor did not pay over RCT deducted at source.  This particular risk area has been greatly mitigated since the electronic RCT system was introduced as it provides the Revenue Commissioners with the facility to monitor RCT activity in realtime, to identify risks and to intervene early in cases with the highest risk of evasion.

It has also succeeded in taking away the vulnerabilities for fraud, mainly extraction fraud, based on bogus contractors and bogus documentation that attached to the previous paper-based RCT system. This is a critical feature of the electronic RCT system. The previous paper-based system was exploited by criminal gangs with extraction repayment frauds using bogus deduction cards and bogus sub-contractors to obtain significant fraudulent claims. The electronic RCT system has been designed to remove the opportunity to extract fraudulent claims from the Exchequer.

Mortgage Data

Questions (14)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

14. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Finance the extent to which he and his Department continue to monitor the situation with the various lending institutions in respect of mortgage arrears with particular reference to the purchase of loan books by unregulated third parties and the influence this may have on banking in general; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45950/14]

View answer

Written answers

My Department and I actively monitor the evolving situation with regard to mortgages arrears.  The Government is very aware of the difficulties some homeowners are facing in meeting their mortgage commitments and has a clear strategy to support households in arrears.  The Government published the Report of the Inter-Departmental Mortgage Arrears Working Group in October 2011 (commonly known as the Keane Report) and the key recommendations of that Report have been adopted by Government as the most appropriate framework to address this problem.  The implementation of this strategy is overseen at Government level by the Construction 2020, Housing, Planning and Mortgage Arrears sub-committee which is chaired by the Taoiseach.

As part of the strategy, lenders were encouraged to develop practical solutions tailored to individual circumstances for people in the most difficulty with their mortgage.  In that regard, in March 2013, the Central Bank published the Mortgage Arrears Resolution Targets - or what is commonly known as the MART framework.  This set out performance targets for mortgage arrears resolutions for six mortgage lenders.  These six are AIB, Bank of Ireland, Permanent TSB, Ulster Bank, KBC Bank Ireland and ACC.  My Department also publishes data on a monthly basis on mortgage restructures and arrears for these six main banks. 

In addition, Irish financial services legislation, including Codes issued by the Central Bank of Ireland, provide strong protections to borrowers when dealing with regulated lenders. In particular, for borrowers facing financial difficulty on mortgages, the Central Bank's Code of Conduct on Mortgage Arrears (the "CCMA") sets out requirements for mortgage lenders dealing with borrowers facing or in mortgage arrears. The CCMA provides a strong consumer protection framework to ensure that borrowers struggling to keep up mortgage repayments are treated in a fair and transparent manner by their lender, and that long term resolution is sought by lenders with each of their borrowers.

The CCMA applies to the mortgage lending activities of all regulated entities, except credit unions, operating in the State, including, inter alia, a financial services provider authorised, registered or licensed in another EU or EEA Member State and which has provided, or is providing, mortgage lending activities in the State. The sale of a loan book by a regulated entity to an unregulated entity does not require Central Bank approval. Only certain lending activities are required to be regulated.

However, the Government is committed to bring forward legislation to protect consumers whose loans are sold.  In July and August, the Department of Finance ran a public consultation seeking views on this proposed legislation.  Nineteen submissions were received from a range of respondents including consumer groups, the financial services industry, public representatives and individuals.  The submissions are accessible on the Department's website.  Officials in my Department have carefully considered these submissions and are working with the Office of the Attorney General to progress this legislation.  My officials will meet with the Joint Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform later today on this issue.  It is anticipated that the legislation will be published by the end of the year.

Corporation Tax Regime

Questions (15)

Richard Boyd Barrett

Question:

15. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Finance his views on reports that he is working with US multinationals to design the new knowledge box corporation tax scheme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45993/14]

View answer

Written answers

In the Budget I announced several changes to Ireland's corporation tax policy, as part of an overall strategy to "play fair and play to win".   This included a change to Ireland's rules on company tax residence which will bring our company residence rules into line with those in the rest of the OECD and an end to the so-called 'Double Irish'.  This was balanced with a number of competitive enhancements which were contained in the "Road Map for Ireland's Tax Competitiveness". 

This strategy was underpinned by extensive research undertaken and commissioned by my Department over the course of 2014 which has now been published on my Department's website.

One of the key findings of the research is that the foreign direct investment ('FDI') sector is very important for economic growth and employment in Ireland and that Ireland needs a competitive corporate tax offering to attract FDI.  In particular, we need to ensure a competitive offering for knowledge-based investment which is related to research and development and intellectual property.

In recognition of the fact that investment and growth in OECD economies is increasingly driven by investment in intangible assets, putting in place an attractive intellectual property offering is key for Ireland's success in attracting FDI.  This is why I made a clear statement of my intention to introduce a competitive income-based regime for intangible assets in Ireland which will be called a "Knowledge Development Box" or "KDB".

I view this as a positive measure for Ireland and my intention is that the Irish KDB will be among the best in class on offer internationally.  In order to gather views from as broad a spectrum as possible on what this may entail, I will launch a public consultation process before the end of this year on how the Irish KDB should operate. 

As is the case with all public consultations that have been undertaken by my Department on corporation tax, input is welcomed from all sections of society.  A number of parties came forward to give their views on the public consultation on the OECD Base Erosion and Profit Shifting ('BEPS') Project from earlier this year, including groups who represent multinationals who are based in Ireland, political parties, Non-Governmental Organisations and individual citizens.  I expect the consultation on the KDB will be no different, and I would encourage all interested parties to input to this process.

It is intended that the design of the KDB in Ireland will be along the lines of what are commonly known as 'patent boxes' which have existed for many years in countries that compete with us for FDI.  At present, the measures that are in place in our competitor jurisdictions are the subject of on-going discussions at the OECD and EU level, as regards to their compatibility with the international rules around fair corporation taxation.   As I said in my Budget announcement, it will be necessary to ensure that the Irish KDB meets with the standards that remain to be agreed by both the OECD and the EU.

Budget 2015

Questions (16)

Seán Kyne

Question:

16. Deputy Seán Kyne asked the Minister for Finance if, notwithstanding the very welcome tax reductions being implemented in the Finance Bill including the reduction in the different universal social charge bands, the top rate of tax and the increase in the standard rate tax band, further tax reduction measures, with particular reference to further raising the point at which a person commences paying the top rate of tax, may be considered and implemented sooner than the next scheduled budget should the State's financial position continue to improve; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45971/14]

View answer

Written answers

I thank the Deputy for acknowledging and welcoming the changes introduced in the recent Budget. I have long said that the burden of the income tax system in Ireland is too high and that I would seek to reduce it as soon as it was prudent to do so.

The improvement in the public finances coupled within increased economic growth and rising employment which have followed from our prudent management of the economy has allowed me to make good on our commitment to ease the burden of taxation.

The reduction in the higher rate of income tax from 41% to 40%, the extension of the standard rate band at which people begin to pay the higher rate of income tax, and the changes to the USC rates will take effect from next month onwards. The effect of these measures will see all those who currently pay income tax and or USC receive an increase in their take home pay.

As I said on Budget Day and since, if the economic and fiscal space allow, we will continue with this approach to personal taxation in subsequent Budgets.

However, on the matter of further tax reductions prior to next year's Budget, the Revenue Commissioners have indicated that there would be significant administrative difficulties in making changes to tax rates or bands mid-year.  The last mid-year change in a rate band was when the income levy was introduced by the previous Government in 2009.  This required Revenue to calculate a "Composite rate" made up of percentages of the rates before and after the changeover date which was applied on review.   A composite rate has serious implications for the operation of the cumulative system of deduction under PAYE.  It introduces additional complexity to the reconciliation of tax deducted throughout the year with the end of year P35.  This can lead to significant underpayments where employers fail to implement on time and this leads to collection issues in the subsequent year.

It would also create problems for payroll operators, impacting software providers and those in smaller businesses where manual payroll systems are used, thus adding an unnecessary administrative burden to business.

A change like this could also incentivise income shifting as those taxpayers who could do so, may seek to ensure that the more beneficial rates of tax are applied to their income, depending on when the tax is paid.    

Finally, a mid-year change to the standard rate band would require the passage of a money bill by the Dáil. 

It is important to note however, that the income tax measures introduced in Budget 2015 are the first stage of a three-year plan to progressively reduce the marginal tax rate on low and middle income earners in a manner that maintains the highly progressive nature of the Irish tax system.

Banking Sector

Questions (17)

Mick Wallace

Question:

17. Deputy Mick Wallace asked the Minister for Finance if he will provide details on plans for the sale of AIB to the private sector; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45992/14]

View answer

Written answers

Now that the bank has returned to profit, is on a stable path and has passed the ECB's Comprehensive Assessment, my officials will engage with the management team to explore how we can reconfigure the bank's capital structure to make it fit for purpose. Regulatory rules and expectations have changed dramatically in the past couple of years and we need to lay out a plan to position the bank for this new environment. As part of this process we hope to agree a roadmap that will see the bank start to return cash to the State so we begin the process of repaying the taxpayers large investment.

With respect to the State's shareholdings or ownership in the banks, Government policy remains unchanged that we do not wish to hold these investments in the banks over the long term.  Subject to market conditions therefore we are willing to exit in a manner that maximises value for the taxpayer.

In the last 18 months the State has exited successfully from some debt investments with the sale of our "Cocos" and Preference Shares in Bank of Ireland in addition to the sale of Irish Life. Given the significant cash resources we hold, we are not under any immediate pressure to exit our remaining investments however given where our national debt is, neither do we have the luxury of holding on indefinitely.

We are not making any decisions around reducing our ownership in the bank now, as we have important decisions to make around how we should best reconfigure our existing investments in a way that benefits both the bank and the taxpayer. That's our main priority in the coming months. If we can deliver on this work programme next year and everything else develops as we would like, including the bank's performance and market conditions, then we may be at the point where we can consider selling some of our shares.

Revenue Commissioners Investigations

Questions (18)

Denis Naughten

Question:

18. Deputy Denis Naughten asked the Minister for Finance the progress to date on investigations into petrol stretching; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45951/14]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners, who are responsible for tackling fuel fraud, that they are very aware of the risks posed to consumers' vehicles, legitimate businesses and the exchequer by all forms of fuel fraud.

Every Filling Station about which a complaint was made has been visited by Revenue Enforcement officers and samples were taken for analysis by the State Laboratory.  A total of 175 samples of petrol from Filling Stations and other sources have been taken for analysis following checks conducted from June 2014 to date.  The scientific analysis required is complex and time consuming and the State Laboratory has conducted extensive tests and re-tests on the samples.  Normally, when fraudsters attempt to "stretch" petrol, they add methanol, kerosene or other low excise duty agents.  Despite extensive testing by the State Laboratory, no evidence of the presence of methanol, kerosene or any other known prohibited stretching agent has been found in any of the samples, except two samples taken from one site on the eastern seaboard.  The conclusive results received in that particular case has resulted in seizure of the product, closure of the facility and a file is being prepared for prosecution.

Following a series of further tests conducted by the State Laboratory, results have been received in recent days which indicate the presence of traces of road diesel  in several samples taken from a variety of locations  during August and September.  This could indicate that petrol was contaminated with road diesel at some point in time.  There is no rational economic reason or fraudulent incentive for anyone to deliberately mix normal road diesel with petrol.  This contamination could have taken place earlier in the summer, well ahead of the problems manifesting themselves in cars in Co Mayo and elsewhere. 

If the problems that have come to light were caused by an unintended contamination as a result of diesel being inadvertently mixed into petrol at some point along the supply chain, there would be no Revenue offence involved.  However, the Deputies can be assured that the Revenue Commissioners are vigorously investigating the possibility of tax fraud being associated with the identified problems. In any instances where the analysis of petrol samples by the State Laboratory indicates the presence of illegal stretching agents, Revenue will take swift and robust action and pursue prosecutions against offenders where possible.

The Revenue Commissioners are also undertaking  investigation in conjunction with An Garda Síochána. This includes sharing of information and intelligence and intensive monitoring of the situation.

In addition, as part of its routine compliance work Revenue actively monitor the mineral oil sector through analysis of monthly Return of Oil Movements and supply chain data. Any anomalies or breaches of Regulations detected are fully investigated as a matter of course. 

I wish to assure the Deputy I am satisfied the Revenue Commissioners are taking all possible actions to identify the problem and challenge any instances of identified fuel fraud including, where possible,  pursuing prosecutions against offenders.

Property Tax Exemptions

Questions (19)

Clare Daly

Question:

19. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Finance his views regarding the delay in implementing changes to the local property tax pyrite exemption, which he has acknowledged needs to be addressed, bearing in mind that the delay is causing significant stress for homeowners whose properties are worthless in the context that the Revenue Commissioners have been sending letters demanding payment in the past two weeks; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45948/14]

View answer

Written answers

As I previously advised the Deputy in response to Parliamentary Questions Nos. 14 (37016/14) and 31 (37015/14) on 2/10/14 and Parliamentary Question No. 38 (41718/14) of 5/11/2014, officials of my Department, together with officials of the Department of Environment, Community & Local Government, are examining the alternatives other than testing that may be available in order to confirm entitlement to a Local Property Tax (LPT) exemption. 

I expect to make a decision in the matter shortly that will be consistent with the original objectives of the legislation and the report of the Pyrite Panel, and I will communicate my decision to the Deputy immediately it is made.

I am conscious that the issue to which the Deputy refers needs to be addressed. I thank her for bringing this matter to attention again and I want to reassure her, and those homeowners affected, that this issue is receiving attention. 

It is important that any changes that may be made do not go beyond the objectives of providing a temporary exemption for homes with "significant pyritic damage" only. As I have advised on many occasions in the past, a liability to LPT should apply to all owners of residential property with a limited number of exemptions.  Limiting the exemptions available allows the rate of the tax to be kept low for those liable persons who do not qualify for an exemption.

Pending any decisions in relation to the statutory provisions, Revenue has an obligation to act in accordance with section 10A of the Finance (Local Property Tax) Act 2012 (as amended) which requires that an LPT exemption can only apply where the residential property has been assessed and a certificate confirming "significant pyritic damage" has been issued.

In assessing the value of their property for LPT for May 2013 homeowners whose property is affected by pyrite would have factored this into the valuation. In effect, the presence of pyrite in an estate would have had an impact on the valuation of properties in the estate.

As regards correspondence to householders, I am advised by Revenue that as part of its 2015 pay and file campaign for LPT it issued letters in October to just under one million property owners who paid their 2014 LPT charge in a lump sum or who made regular cash payments, asking them to select a payment method for 2015.  These owners, who paid their 2014 LPT in a lump sum, or who made regular cash payments, need to tell Revenue how they will pay their 2015 LPT charge.

Property owners wishing to spread their payments over the course of 2015 were required to confirm their payment method by 25 November 2014. Owners who opt to pay their 2015 LPT in full by cheque, postal order, cash, debit card or credit card should make their payment on or before 7 January 2015. Owners who opt to pay their 2015 LPT by Single Debit Authority should confirm this payment method to Revenue on or before 7 January 2015, however, the payment will not be deducted from their current account until 21 March 2015.

Tax Reliefs Availability

Questions (20)

Lucinda Creighton

Question:

20. Deputy Lucinda Creighton asked the Minister for Finance the length of time it will take to receive approval from the European Commission to make the amendments to the employment and investment incentive which have been announced in budget 2015; if the delay in receiving approval from the Commission for the scheme introduced last year, section 45 of the Finance (No. 2) Bill 2013, is a cause for concern in this regard considering that the relevant provision has not yet been commenced; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [44357/14]

View answer

Written answers

As the Deputy is aware, I announced a number of changes to the Employment and Investment Incentive in the recent Budget, as a result of a significant review that was carried out by my Department in consultation with the Revenue Commissioners, which included a public consultation process.

The EII is being amended to raise company limits, increase the holding period from 3 to 4 years and to include medium-sized companies in non-assisted areas and internationally traded financial services. These measures are subject to approval from the European Commission. Hotels, guest houses and self-catering accommodation will remain eligible for a further 3 years and the operating and managing of nursing homes will be included for 3 years.

My officials will be notifying the European Commission of these changes to the EII once the measures in the Finance Bill have been enacted and it is hoped that approval will follow shortly thereafter.

Section 597A of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 provides for CGT entrepreneur relief as introduced by Budget 2014 and Section 45 of the Finance (No 2) Act 2013. The relief was introduced subject to European Commission approval and discussions and exchanges have been taking taken place with the European Commission on that issue.

Arising from those discussions, a number of changes are being made in Finance Bill 2014 to the CGT entrepreneur relief provisions in order that the relief would satisfy the EU Commission's new General Block Exemption Regulations introduced earlier this year, thus obviating the need for formal EU approval of the relief from a State-aid perspective.

The changes involve targeting the relief at individuals involved in newly created enterprises or enterprises created within the last 7 years, placing a cap of €15 million on the total risk finance investment made in each such enterprise and ensuring that the risk finance investment is made by the entrepreneurs at the commencement of the new business. Other changes are also being made to the relief to make it more compatible with the commercial reality of conducting business on the ground.

The revised provisions of Section 597A (as included in section 52 of Finance Bill 2014 as passed by Dáil Éireann) will be effective from the passing of that Bill. The CGT relief will apply, among other conditions, where new chargeable business assets have been acquired on or after 1 January 2014.

Banking Sector

Questions (21)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

21. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance further to his views regarding the future of AIB the reason he is quoted as saying the bank will return to private ownership over a number of years through a public selling of the shares in view of his commitment to apply for the retrospective recapitalisation of the pillar banks. [45942/14]

View answer

Written answers

AIB's return to profitability is good news from the perspective of the Irish taxpayer, as it enhances the value of the bank for the taxpayer. The last valuation of our AIB shares was carried out by the NPRFC at the end of 2013, and this valued the State's ordinary and preference shareholding at €10 billion. Including the Contingent Capital Notes we hold or coco's, this brings the value of the State's shareholding to €11.6 billion. Since then, bank stocks in many Eurozone countries have performed well, and with AIB itself performing strongly, I would therefore be confident that the current value of AIB is greater than the NPRF valuation at end 2013.

Now that the bank has returned to profit, is on a stable path and has passed the ECB's Comprehensive Assessment, my officials will engage with the management team to explore how we can reconfigure the bank's capital structure to make it fit for purpose. The regulatory rules and expectations have changed dramatically in the past couple of years and we need to lay out a plan to position the bank for this new environment. As part of this process we hope to agree a roadmap that will see the bank start to return cash to the State so we begin the process of repaying the taxpayers large investment.

With respect to the State's shareholdings or ownership in the banks, Government policy remains unchanged that we do not wish to hold these investments in the banks over the long term.  Subject to market conditions therefore we are willing to exit in a manner that maximises value for the taxpayer.

In the last 18 months the State has exited successfully from some debt investments with the sale of our " Cocos" and Preference Shares in Bank of Ireland in addition to the sale of Irish Life. Given the significant cash resources we hold, we are not under any immediate pressure to exit our remaining investments however given where our national debt is, neither do we have the luxury of holding on indefinitely.

We are not making any decisions around reducing our ownership in the bank now, because as I've just outlined, we have important decisions to make around how we should best reconfigure our existing investments in a way that benefits both the bank and the taxpayer. That's our main priority in the coming months. If we can deliver on this work programme next year and everything else develops as we would like, then we may be at the point where we can consider selling some of our shares.

In relation to retrospective recapitalisation via the ESM, I would reiterate what I've said previously, that it serves our interest to keep this on the table. However I see no benefit in making an application to the ESM now. I believe the work we plan to do with AIB in the coming months will help us better understand what our investments are really worth, and ultimately which route - ESM or the markets - will be our best option.

Economic Growth Rate

Questions (22)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

22. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Finance the extent to which economic indicators reflect improvement in the economy on an annual basis in each of the past three years to date; the extent to which such trends will continue with resultant ongoing benefit to the economy; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45949/14]

View answer

Written answers

The Government's principal strategy for economic and budgetary policy for the last number of years has been to put the economy and the public finances on a more stable footing.  Through the implementation of substantial adjustments, significant progress has been made in restoring fiscal stability and economic growth. The recovery in employment began in 2012 and by the third quarter of this year we have seen eight successive increases in employment with over 80,000 more jobs in the economy than at the low point just over two years ago. 

The recovery has taken longer to become evident in the headline GDP numbers with essentially zero growth recorded in 2012 and 2013 cumulatively. While the underlying performance of the domestic economy was positive, developments in the pharma-chem and ICT sectors served to weigh down on GDP. The data so far this year would suggest that this effect is over, with GDP growth of nearly 6 per cent recorded in the first half of this year. My Department is forecasting full-year GDP growth of 4.7 per cent this year. This is being driven by strong growth in exports but domestic demand indicators such as industrial production and retail sales are both in positive territory. This recovery has manifested itself in tax revenues which are expected to come in €1 billion (or 2.5 per cent) above original expectations.

Turning to fiscal policy, the macroeconomic and fiscal framework underpinning Budget 2015 was more favourable than anticipated. This was down to positive economic developments over the summer, an increase in tax revenues compared to profile as well as a reduction in national debt interest costs.  This allowed the introduction of a package of income tax reductions and expenditure increases amounting to €1,050 million in Budget 2015, or about 0.6 per cent of GDP.  This package is likely to have a positive short-run impact on aggregate demand in the economy compared to an alternative of no policy change. It is estimated that the Budget package will add 0.3 per cent to real GDP in 2015 and an additional 0.2 percentage points to employment growth. 

Over the medium term my Department is forecasting average annual growth of just over 3 per cent in the 2015-2018 period. This is driven by a positive contribution from net exports on the back of economic growth in Ireland's trading partners.  Domestic demand is set to contribute to growth as well, with growing employment and rising household incomes resulting in an increase in private consumption.

Mortgage Lending

Questions (23)

Seán Kyne

Question:

23. Deputy Seán Kyne asked the Minister for Finance his views that the new regulations under consideration by the Central Bank of Ireland, such as a requirement to have 20% of a deposit of house price to secure a mortgage and other restrictions being considered by financial institutions, such as restricting mortgage lending to persons under 40 years of age only, overlook substantial causes of the housing and construction bubble, and the subsequent financial turmoil, which were the availability of 100%, 110% and higher mortgages and that these restrictions will hamper a person's ability to purchase a home with further consequences for the rental market and ultimately contribute to an increase in homelessness; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45970/14]

View answer

Written answers

As the Deputy is aware, the Central Bank of Ireland has recently published a consultation paper regarding macro-prudential measures for residential mortgage lending in Ireland. The Central Bank measures, as set out in the consultation document, would place restrictions on the loan to value (LTV) and loan to income (LTI) ratios banks can apply when lending for house purchase. They would apply to all mortgage lending in Ireland by regulated firms. The Central Bank has indicated that the primary objective of these measures is to increase the resilience of the banking and household sectors to the property market and to try to reduce the risk of bank credit and housing price spirals from developing in future. A copy of the Consultation Paper is available on the Central Bank website.

http://www.centralbank.ie/press-area/press-releases/Pages/CentralBankpublishesnewmacro-prudentialmeasuresformortgagelending.aspx

The Central Bank is undertaking a wide public consultation process on its proposals and any person who has a view or comments on the proposals can submit them electronically to the Central Bank at realestate@centralbank.ie by 8 December 2014 and these will be taken in to account by the Central Bank in its further consideration of the matter.

I am on the record as recognising the importance of sustainable and sensible mortgage lending and that there should be no return to the cycle of boom and bust mortgage lending. However, there is also a need to be mindful of the real needs of the economy and that any new macro prudential measures will not cause an undue distortion of economic and prudent lending activity. While I recognise that this is an area that falls within the independent competence of the Central Bank, there is a case to be made for introducing such measures in a more graduated manner for example in relation to the proportion of private home mortgages initially that can exceed the 80% LTV threshold.  Some adjustment to the proposals would allow home buyers and lenders time to adapt their economic behaviour and adjust to the new regulatory realities.

It is noted that a number of other countries who have introduced similar macro prudential measures have also adopted a graduated implementation approach. My Department's submission to the Central Bank is being finalised at present and will be submitted by the due deadline of Monday next.

As the Deputy will also be aware, Budget 2015 contained a number of measures to support a functioning housing market. In particular, in order to support first time buyers to save towards a deposit for their first home, DIRT will be refunded in respect of savings up to a maximum of 20% of the purchase price. This measure will run until the end of 2017.

Economic Growth

Questions (24)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

24. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance his views on the Irish Fiscal Advisory Council report and, in particular, its concerns regarding the potential for a distortion in growth figures. [45943/14]

View answer

Written answers

I note the views expressed by the Irish Fiscal Advisory Council in its recent Fiscal Assessment Report and welcome its assessment that targeting a deficit of 2.7 per cent of GDP in 2015 is considered conducive to prudent economic and budgetary management.

With regard to the Council's assertion that Budget 2015 represents a 'missed opportunity' and further consolidation should have been  implemented, the Government's overarching fiscal goal has always been to reach a deficit below 3 per cent of GDP in 2015.  On the basis of Budget forecasts, this will be achieved.  While consolidation would have improved the headline deficit figure, the Government has a number of other issues to consider such as the need to safeguard the economic recovery and preserve social cohesion.

Chapter 2 of the recent report highlights the issue of contracted manufacturing. In brief, the impact of contracted manufacturing has been to boost recorded GDP in the first half of this year. This phenomenon has been under observation for some time by staff of my Department. Indeed, the Economic and Fiscal Outlook that accompanied Budget 2015 contained a detailed explanation of the issue  to which I would refer the Deputy if he requires a detailed explanation: http://www.budget.gov.ie/Budgets/2015/Documents/141014%20Economic%20and%20Fiscal%20Outlook%20REV%202.pdf.

However it is important to stress that the contribution of contracted production to growth cannot be calculated with precision with the publicly available data to hand.

It should be recalled that large movements in GDP relating to activities of the foreign-owned sector in Ireland are not new. Foreign-owned firms in are generally large, high-turnover enterprises concentrated in certain sectors and firm-specific and product-specific devleopments can have a bearing on measured GDP.

Notwithstanding these developments relating to contracted production, there is no doubt that economic recovery has gained momentum this year and that it has broadened to include a recovery in domestic demand.  High-frequency data such as retail sales, industrial production and purchasing managers' indices (PMIs) are all in strong positive territory. Employment growth resumed in 2012 and the Live Register continues to fall month-on-month. This recovery has manifested itself in tax revenues which are expected to come in €1 billion (or 2.5 per cent) above original expectations.

Returning to the issue of contracted production, it should be recalled that it involves very little employment effect or second-round impact on the wider economy and complicates the task of forecasting net exports.  As developments are sector- and product-specific they have the potential to unwind or accelerate with potentially large impacts on measured GDP.

Tax Code

Questions (25)

Mick Wallace

Question:

25. Deputy Mick Wallace asked the Minister for Finance if he will provide an update on the consultation process he announced in his budget speech regarding the proposed tax on vacant sites; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45968/14]

View answer

Written answers

There is a view that owners of zoned and serviced land are waiting for higher prices and that is why they are not taking steps to develop their land or sell it to others who will. As I announced on Budget Day, it is my intention to launch a public consultation in the coming months on this issue. If this turns out to be a valid point of view, I will examine what taxation measures might be taken to penalise land owners who do not develop land that is already zoned and serviced. Any decisions regarding taxation or other appropriate measures will follow the consultation process.

Revenue Commissioners Investigations

Questions (26)

Denis Naughten

Question:

26. Deputy Denis Naughten asked the Minister for Finance the steps he is taking to curb the practice of petrol stretching; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45952/14]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners, who are responsible for tackling fuel fraud, that they are very aware of the risks posed to consumers' vehicles, legitimate businesses and the exchequer by all forms of fuel fraud.

Every Filling Station about which a complaint was made has been visited by Revenue Enforcement officers and samples were taken for analysis by the State laboratory.

A total of 175 samples of petrol from Filling Stations and other sources have been taken for analysis following checks conducted from June 2014 to date.  The scientific analysis required is complex and time consuming and the State Laboratory has conducted extensive tests and re-tests on the samples.  Normally, when fraudsters attempt to "stretch" petrol, they add methanol, kerosene or other low excise duty agents.  Despite extensive testing by the State Laboratory, no evidence of the presence of methanol, kerosene or any other known prohibited stretching agent has been found in any of the samples, except two samples taken from one site on the eastern seaboard.  The conclusive results received in that particular case has resulted in seizure of the product, closure of the facility and a file is being prepared for prosecution.

Following a series of further tests conducted by the State Laboratory, results have been received in recent days which indicate the presence of traces of road diesel  in several samples taken from a variety of locations during August and September.  This could indicate that petrol was contaminated with road diesel at some point in time.  There is no rational economic reason or fraudulent incentive for anyone to deliberately mix normal road diesel with petrol.  This contamination could have taken place earlier in the summer, well ahead of the problems manifesting themselves in cars in Co Mayo and elsewhere.

If the problems that have come to light were caused by an unintended contamination as a result of diesel being inadvertently mixed into petrol at some point along the supply chain, there would be no Revenue offence involved.  However, the Deputies can be assured that the Revenue Commissioners are vigorously investigating the possibility of tax fraud being associated with the identified problems. In any instances where the analysis of petrol samples by the State Laboratory indicates the presence of illegal stretching agents, Revenue will take swift and robust action and pursue prosecutions against offenders where possible.

The Revenue Commissioners are also undertaking investigations in conjunction with An Garda Síochána. This includes sharing of information and intelligence and intensive monitoring of the situation.

In addition, as part of its routine compliance work Revenue actively monitor the mineral oil sector through analysis of monthly Return of Oil Movements and supply chain data. Any anomalies or breaches of Regulations detected are fully investigated as a matter of course.

I wish to assure the Deputy I am satisfied the Revenue Commissioners are taking all possible actions to identify the problem and challenge any instances of identified fuel fraud including, where possible,  pursuing prosecutions against offenders.

VAT Rate Application

Questions (27)

Clare Daly

Question:

27. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Finance his plans regarding the VAT Directive applicable only to multinationals, neutralising VAT between related companies, but providing a substantial cash flow advantage to multinational corporations competing in the same market place as small indigenous business; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45947/14]

View answer

Written answers

The EU VAT Directive does not provide specific rules that are applicable only to multinationals or allow for cash flow advantages that are available to multinational corporations and not to small indigenous business. My officials believe the Deputy may be referring to VAT groups.

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that the EU VAT Directive establishes the EU Community VAT legislation upon which the national VAT legislation of all EU Member States, including Ireland, must comply.  Article 11 of the VAT Directive provides that a Member State may regard as a single taxable person (or VAT group) any persons established in the territory of that Member State who, while legally independent, are closely bound to each other by financial, economic and organisational links.  Article 11 is transposed into Irish legislation in Section 15 of the Value-Added Tax Consolidation Act 2010.  Section 15 provides that the Revenue Commissioners may regard two or more person established in the State that are closely bound by financial, economic and organisational links as a single taxable person (or VAT group) if this seems necessary or appropriate for the purpose of efficient and effective administration (including collection).

Where the Revenue Commissioners treat a number of related persons as a single taxable person this generally removes the necessity of issuing VAT invoices in respect of transactions between these persons except in the case of certain property transactions. The persons that may be considered as related persons for the purposes of a single taxable person (or VAT group), is not confined to multinational corporations and includes a body corporate and an unincorporated body of persons as well as individuals.  Since the type of person who may be included in a VAT group is broad in scope I cannot accept that the VAT provisions referred to by the Deputy provide a greater advantage to multinational corporations.

Furthermore, the Irish VAT code provides a generous cash flow advantage, specifically for small to medium enterprises, under the cash accounting system.  While VAT is normally accounted for on the basis of invoices issued, regardless of whether or not the trader has been paid for the supply, businesses with an annual turnover of €2 million or less can opt to account for VAT on a cash receipts basis, where they do not have to pay VAT until payment for the supply is actually received.  This facility assists a significant number of small indigenous businesses in the critical area of cash flow.

Banking Sector Staff

Questions (28)

Dessie Ellis

Question:

28. Deputy Dessie Ellis asked the Minister for Finance the number of workers outsourced at each of the State backed banks; and the plans of each of the banks to outsource further. [45967/14]

View answer

Written answers

As the Deputy will be aware under the Relationship Frameworks the State does not intervene in the day to day operations of the banks or their management decisions regarding commercial matters. Any staff who transfer under outsourcing arrangements transfer under the TUPE regulations.

I have recently answered a parliamentary question on the same topic as follows:

With regard to the number of staff employed, AIB and PSTB have provided me with the following information:

AIB

AIB's disclosures in relation to employee numbers are made twice yearly in its Annual and Half-Yearly Reports. In its 2014 Half-Yearly Financial Report the bank stated that it had 11,385 employees as at 30 June 2014. AIB manages outsourcing within its commercial business requirements and enters into arrangements with service providers to deliver a range of services not conducted by the bank. It is up to each service provider to manage the number of staff required to fulfil l the contract it enters into with AIB. AIB does not disclose details of individual or collective contracts on confidentiality grounds.

AIB continues to manage its cost base and is on track to reduce operating costs by €350m in 2014 relative to 2012 levels.

PTSB

Staff numbers are included in the Annual and Half-Yearly reports published by the bank. PTSB has also confirmed that it has a small number of outsourcing arrangements with c.70 outsourced staff.

In the case of Bank of Ireland disclosures in relation to employees are made twice yearly in its Annual and Interim Reports. In its 2014 Interim report the bank stated that it had 11,386 employees as at 30 June 2014. The bank does not provide staff numbers in relation to outsourcing arrangements.

In addition to this, each of the banks provided further details of its outsourcing arrangements as part of the questionnaire prepared in advance of their recent appearance at the meeting of the Committee for Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform. The banks' responses in this regard covered:

- functions that have been outsourced;

- companies with which the banks have outsourcing arrangements; and,

- total staff numbers.

The completed questionnaire for each of the banks is available on the Oireachtas website.

Top
Share