Skip to main content
Normal View

Wednesday, 25 May 2016

Written Answers Nos. 326-338

Agri-Environment Options Scheme Data

Questions (326)

Charlie McConalogue

Question:

326. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the number of participants in the rural environment protection scheme, agri-environment options scheme 1, AEOS scheme 2 and AEOS scheme 3 as of 20 May 2016; the completion date for participants in each scheme; the number of farmers who have indicated that they will be transferring from the AEOS scheme to tranche 2 of the green low-carbon agri-environment scheme; the number that transferred from these schemes to tranche 1 of GLAS, in each case broken down between AEOS 1, 2 and 3; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12124/16]

View answer

Written answers

All AEOS 1 contracts ended on 31 December 2015. AEOS 2 contracts have an end date of 31 December 2016. With AEOS 3 contracts ending on 31 December 2018 only AEOS 2 and 3 applicants were in an AEOS contract when GLAS tranche 2 commenced. The information requested by the Deputy in detailed in the following tables.

Numbers in AEOS Schemes 20 May 2016

Scheme

Numbers at 20th May

Completion date

AEOS 1

0

31/12/2015

AEOS 2

4296

31/12/2016

AEOS 3

2690

31/12/2018

AEOS 1, 2 and 3 Applicants transferred to GLAS Tranche 1

Total to GLAS 1

4316

AEOS 1

1344

AEOS 2

617

AEOS 3

2355

AEOS 2 and 3 Applicants transferred to GLAS Tranche 2

Total to GLAS 2

1636

AEOS 2

942

AEOS 3

694

It will be open to AEOS participants to transfer to GLAS in the third tranche.

Plant Protection Products

Questions (327)

Charlie McConalogue

Question:

327. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine his views regarding the use here of the herbicide glyphosate; the monitoring programme that is in place; the discussions he has had at European Union level with regard to renewing its authorisation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12125/16]

View answer

Written answers

Glyphosate is a non-selective systemic herbicide that is applied directly to plant foliage. It was first commercialised in the mid 1970’s and is registered worldwide. Its uses incorporate agriculture, forestry, industrial, home and garden, and semi aquatic areas.

A decision on renewal of the approval of glyphosate for use in plant protection products placed on the market in the EU is due to be made by 30 June 2016. The issue has been discussed by Member State representatives at meetings of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed held on 7-8 March 2016 and 18-19 May 2016. A vote has not been taken yet on the EU Commission proposal for renewal of approval.

The Commission’s draft proposal is based on a very extensive evaluation performed by Germany and peer reviewed by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and Member State experts. The EU peer review process was comprehensive and rigorous and was specially extended to allow for detailed consideration of the report produced in 2015 by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) of the World Health Organisation. Following the extended peer review, EFSA concluded that glyphosate is unlikely to pose a carcinogenic hazard to humans. This conclusion was supported by 27 out of 28 Member State toxicology experts, and is in line with the conclusions of other regulatory agencies around the world, including those in Australia, Canada, Japan and the United States.

My Department considers that the EU peer review process for glyphosate has clearly identified safe uses and that the regulatory proposal presented contained appropriate measures for implementation by Member States to address concerns that have been raised.

It should be noted that the legal basis for the appropriate chemical hazard classification of glyphosate in Europe, including its carcinogenic potential, will be provided by an assessment overseen by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), which is due to begin later in 2016 and run for 18 months.

All plant protection product uses (including glyphosate) are monitored via my Department’s annual pesticide residue monitoring programme. This is a programme that is agreed in conjunction with the Food Safety Authority of Ireland and the European Commission. The programme involves the sampling of produce at distribution centres, retailers, and other storage and processing premises, and also includes processed food samples. These samples are analysed for up to 400 pesticides including glyphosate. The annual “Pesticides residues in Food” reports can be found on my Department's website:

http://www.pcs.agriculture.gov.ie/foodsafety/themonitoringandcontrolsprogramme/.

In addition, as part of the cross-compliance inspection regime carried out at farm level, checks are carried out to ensure that plant protection products are used by farmers in accordance with their conditions of authorisation. Other monitoring for glyphosate undertaken in Ireland includes an assessment of its prevalence in water bodies, carried out on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency as part of the first phase of the national Water Framework Directive monitoring programme.

Agriculture Industry

Questions (328)

Charlie McConalogue

Question:

328. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine his views on the level of competition in the Irish beef and lamb processing sector; on the planned move by a company (details supplied); the actions taken to ascertain if such a move would undermine competition in these sectors. [12126/16]

View answer

Written answers

Through the Competition and Consumer Protection Commission, the State has an existing and well-established infrastructure for oversight of competition issues and for dealing with allegations of anti-competitive practices or the abuse of a dominant market position. I am very much aware of the importance of competition in both the beef and lamb processing sector and my predecessor the then Minister for Agriculture, Simon Coveney TD made a submission to the Commission on the matter referred to by the Deputy.

It is my understanding that acquisitions or mergers of organisations with turnover exceeding certain statutory thresholds must be notified to that body, or to the European Commission which will subsequently conduct an assessment to determine whether there will be any ‘substantial lessening of competition’. The acquisition referred to by the deputy will be subject to the relevant statutory requirements under competition law.

TAMS Applications

Questions (329)

Michael Collins

Question:

329. Deputy Michael Collins asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine to confirm that an application under the targeted agricultural modernisation scheme will be approved within the next month as farmers need to commence works during the summer period (details supplied). [12128/16]

View answer

Written answers

The applications received for the TAMS II schemes are being examined and approvals are issuing with a view to having all of the eligible applications received in Tranche 1 approved as soon as possible.

Greyhound Industry

Questions (330)

Michael McGrath

Question:

330. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if he will address a number of matters raised in correspondence (details supplied) regarding the export of greyhounds. [12160/16]

View answer

Written answers

Bord na gCon is responsible for the governance, regulation and development of the greyhound industry in the Republic of Ireland.

The wellbeing of greyhounds, including their physical and social environment, is at the core of Ireland’s greyhound industry. Bord na gCon is totally committed to the welfare of greyhounds and the promotion of the highest standards of care throughout the industry. In particular, Bord na gCon’s Code of Practice in relation to the welfare of greyhounds clearly sets out specific standards that all individuals engaged in the care and management of registered greyhounds are expected to meet. The Code of Practice emphasises that owners and keepers must take full responsibility for the physical and social well-being of greyhounds in line with best welfare practice.

Oversight mechanisms in place regarding greyhound exports include inter-agency co-operation, co-operation with fellow members of International Greyhound Forums and from intelligence/information which is received from Welfare Officers during the course of investigations carried out under the Welfare of Greyhounds Act 2011 (the Act). Where any breaches of welfare standards are identified under the Welfare of Greyhounds Act 2011, Bord na gCon takes stringent actions and prosecutions ensue in accordance with the Act.

Bord na gCon advises all owners involved in the export of greyhounds to only export to destinations that provide the expected levels of greyhound care and management as defined in the Code. I strongly endorse this view.

Bord na gCon has informed me that the 24 greyhounds in question were inspected by a veterinary surgeon after their return to Ireland, and found to be in good physical condition. Bord na gCon has confirmed that where breaches of the Welfare of Greyhounds Act are identified, appropriate sanctions will be imposed.

Young Farmers Scheme

Questions (331)

Charlie McConalogue

Question:

331. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine further to Parliamentary Question No. 146 of 26 April 2016 (details supplied), if he will provide an update following the submission of an appeal as per advice from his Department; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12214/16]

View answer

Written answers

The person named submitted an appeal to the National Reserve and Young Farmers Scheme regarding the late submission of applications due to the reasons outlined above. The appeal was received by my Department on 8 May 2016. On the basis of the information set out in the appeal my Department will accept the submission of the late application. An official from my Department has been in direct contact with the person named regarding the application and submission of necessary supporting documentation to allow the application to be processed. Once all supporting documentation has been received the application can be finalised.

Agri-Environment Options Scheme Payments

Questions (332)

Michael Ring

Question:

332. Deputy Michael Ring asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine why a person (details supplied) is not being paid under the agri-environment options scheme for 2015, given the person cannot manage without the payment for 2015 and acted in good faith at all times; if this matter will be finalised; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12221/16]

View answer

Written answers

The person named commenced their AEOS contract on 1 November 2010. Payment issued for the 2010-2014 scheme years.

Under the EU Regulations governing the Scheme and other area-based payment schemes, a comprehensive administrative check, including cross-checks with the Land Parcel Identification System, must be completed before any payment can issue. The application of the person named was also selected for an on-farm inspection which took place on 17 December 2015. During this inspection non-compliances with the Terms and Conditions of the Scheme were noted in relation to the Traditional Stone Wall Maintenance action which resulted in a penalty being incurred. The application was processed on the basis of the inspection findings and payment in respect of the 2015 Scheme year, less penalty, issued in late April, however due to a clerical error the penalty was incorrectly applied. A refund of the incorrectly applied penalty was processed on 23 May 2016 and will be in the bank account belonging to the person named shortly.

Grassland Sheep Scheme Expenditure

Questions (333, 335)

Martin Kenny

Question:

333. Deputy Martin Kenny asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the cost of paying a ewe premium of €10 per head where stocking density is over six ewes per hectare and €20 where there is a stocking density of five ewes or fewer per hectare. [12225/16]

View answer

Martin Kenny

Question:

335. Deputy Martin Kenny asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the estimated cost of the re-introduction in 2017 of the sheep grassland scheme based on current stocking rates and numbers in the national flock. [12227/16]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 333 and 335 together.

The sheep sector is an important component of our agriculture economy and the third largest farming sector in Ireland with over 34,000 producers and an output value of over €230 million in 2015.

It is for this reason that the Programme for Government includes a commitment to introduce a new scheme in support of the sector which, with an estimated expenditure of €25 million per year, will represent a considerable increase on the annual Grassland Sheep scheme (GSS).

The Grassland Sheep Scheme ran from 2010 until final payments in 2015. It required sheep farmers to have a valid Single Payment application with forage areas declared, maintain a ewe breeding flock and submit a sheep census form over the period covered among other statutory requirements on GAEC. Payment was based on the number of ewes declared on an applicant’s census form, the amount of hectares of forage land declared and the type of land declared, be it mountain or lowland.

Over the course of the scheme almost €62 million net was paid to sheep farmers with an average payment of €15 million per year. According to the latest census data available to the Department through the 2014 published census, re-opening the Grassland Sheep Scheme (GSS) in 2017 would cost approximately the same as previous years at around €15 million per annum.

However it must be remembered that it is not the case that the former Grassland Sheep Scheme was discontinued but rather that payments under that scheme have been incorporated into the new Basic Payment Scheme so in effect many farmers are still receiving the benefit of these payments. In addition of course, many sheep farmers are benefitting from the model of convergence applied in Ireland where those with a low initial value will see their entitlements increase over a period of time.

The focus now is on to the design of the new sheep scheme. My Department is currently working on a draft outline of the scheme design with a view to discussing this with farm organisations and stakeholders in the very near future. It is not possible at this point to provide detailed costings from a scheme which is graduated in the way suggested by the Deputy.

Grassland Sheep Scheme Expenditure

Questions (334)

Martin Kenny

Question:

334. Deputy Martin Kenny asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the cost to the Exchequer of the sheep grassland scheme in 2012, 2013 and 2014. [12226/16]

View answer

Written answers

Article 68 of Council Regulation (EC) 73/2009 provided that unused Single Payment Programme funds could be reallocated to support specific types of farming. The Grassland Sheep Scheme introduced in 2010 was a direct support for breeding ewe enterprises funded under this article. This scheme was fully EU funded.

The allocated budget for years 2012, 2013 and 2014 was €18m, €14m and €15m respectively. This payment has now been incorporated into the Basic Payment Scheme currently received by farmers.

Question No. 335 answered with Question No. 333.

Sheep Census

Questions (336)

Martin Kenny

Question:

336. Deputy Martin Kenny asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the number of the national flock and the ratio of upland and lowland numbers. [12228/16]

View answer

Written answers

The data from the December 2015 annual sheep census is not finalised as yet.

Based on returns received in respect of the December 2014 census, the total sheep population at that time was 3.63 million, which comprised 2.0 million lowland and 1.63 million upland sheep – a ratio of 1.2:1.

Sugar Industry

Questions (337, 338)

Martin Kenny

Question:

337. Deputy Martin Kenny asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the role of the State enterprise bodies in the reinstatement of the sugar beet processing industry. [12230/16]

View answer

Martin Kenny

Question:

338. Deputy Martin Kenny asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the logistical and financial supports that will be available for the reinstatement of the sugar beet processing industry; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12231/16]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 337 and 338 together.

I would like to give the Deputy some background to this issue. Prior to the last CAP reform negotiations, my predecessor met with two separate groups which had conducted feasibility studies into the possibility of establishing a new sugar/bioethanol processing facility in the country. The figures published by the interested groups who are investigating the possibility of building a new facility, indicated that the overall capital costs involved could range from €250million to €400million, depending on what type of facility would be constructed.

Both groups were informed at the time that any venture to develop a combined sugar/bioethanol production facility in Ireland, would have to be a viable commercial proposition, and supported by a business case which is sufficiently robust to attract the funding from investors for the very substantial capital investment required. An agreement was reached as part of the overall CAP reform package, negotiated during the Irish Presidency in June 2013, to abolish all sugar quotas by 30 September 2017. This agreement removes, with effect from 1 October 2017, the current EU quota barrier for operators in Ireland or other Member States, wishing to re-establish a sugar beet processing industry. At the time, this agreement was welcomed by those parties who are interested in seeking to re-establish a sugar industry here. It is now up to any commercial interests who wish to establish a sugar plant to move the project forward and to garner sufficient commercial and financial support to turn their plans into a viable reality. The new Programme for a Partnership Government makes clear thatState enterprise bodies will be asked to examine any substantial business plans related to rebuilding the industry with a view to considering appropriate State supports”.

I can confirm that officials in my Department have met with the interested parties a number of times since 2011 to hear from them how the projects are developing and to provide any assistance and advice that has been sought by the interested parties.

Top
Share