Skip to main content
Normal View

Tuesday, 5 Jul 2016

Written Answers Nos. 630 - 658

Alternative Energy Projects

Questions (630)

Éamon Ó Cuív

Question:

630. Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív asked the Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources his policy to ensure that micro-generation by persons is encouraged and that particularly where micro-generation is taking place persons have access to the national grid and get paid a fair amount by way of credit on their bills by their electricity supplier; his plans to introduce legislation to change the regulatory regime as many micro-generators of electricity complain about the terms they are offered and the lack of competition in the market for micro-produced solar and wind energy; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [19709/16]

View answer

Written answers

The Energy White Paper published last December sets out a high-level framework for Ireland's energy transition to a low carbon economy and society and identifies a range of measures and actions to support this aim. One key action is to explore the scope to provide market support for micro-generation technologies.

Exploring the scope to provide support for renewable micro-generation will form part of my Department’s on-going analysis to underpin the introduction of a new Renewable Electricity Support Scheme.

In-depth analysis is now underway to inform the actual costings of a new Renewable Electricity Support Scheme. While no decision has been taken on the precise renewable technologies to be supported, the cost and technical viability of a range of renewable technologies is being assessed, including, for example, micro-generation and solar.  

On the question of a tariff payment for energy exported to the grid from micro-generation, I have no statutory function in this matter. I am aware that since February 2009 Electric Ireland has offered a feed-in tariff on a commercial basis to domestic micro-generators. I understand that Electric Ireland decided to close the scheme to new entrants from the end of 2014. More recently, Electric Ireland extended the tariff to their existing customers from the end of 2015 until the end of 2016. To date, no other electricity supplier has chosen to provide such a tariff, to either domestic or commercial customers, although they have been invited to do so by the Commission for Energy Regulation (CER).

On the question of access to the grid, this is a matter for the Commission for Energy Regulation. Access to the national grid for different types of renewable electricity projects is a key enabler to reaching our national energy and climate change obligations, and I understand that the CER - in its role as the competent authority on this matter - has recently consulted on a Review of Connection and Grid Access Policy (CER/15/284), which addressed the question of access to the grid.

Roads Maintenance

Questions (631)

Peadar Tóibín

Question:

631. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport his views on the request made by the Committee of Public Accounts on 21 January 2016 which outlined concerns that up to 300,000 tonnes may have been disposed of illegally in County Meath with regard to the upgrade of the R158 Trim to Summerhill to Kilcock Road; if Meath County Council has been forthcoming with all the necessary information; if the Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport has fulfilled its duties to the public purse; and if there is a need for an investigation into the upgrade contracts and the disposal of the waste and surplus materials. [19172/16]

View answer

Written answers

The improvement and maintenance of regional and local roads is the statutory responsibility of the local authorities, in accordance with the provisions of Section 13 of the Roads Act 1993.

Regarding the realignment of the R158 regional road by Meath County Council and the alleged illegal dumping of material from that scheme, the key legislative code in combating illegal dumping is the Waste Management Act 1996 (as amended). In particular section 32 of the 1996 Act places the responsibility on the holders of waste to ensure that it is managed in a manner that does not cause environmental pollution. Enforcement of waste legislation, for which my colleague the Minister for Communications, Climate Action and Environment is responsible, including action against illegal activity, is a matter for local authorities and the Office of Environmental Enforcement within the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

I understand that Meath County Council submitted a report on alleged unauthorised dumping adjacent to the R158 to the EPA on the 10th  July 2014. As the Statutory Agency with responsibility for enforcement of waste legislation the EPA is the appropriate agency for adjudicating on and pursuing such cases.

Public Transport

Questions (632)

Eugene Murphy

Question:

632. Deputy Eugene Murphy asked the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport his views on the fact that while over 60% of Bus Éireann coaches, over 200 vehicles, are now wheelchair accessible, it is virtually impossible for wheelchair users to access the coach services in rural Ireland due to a lack of accessible bus stops; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [19107/16]

View answer

Written answers

The National Transport Authority (NTA) has statutory responsibility for securing or providing public transport infrastructure including bus stops, bus shelters, bus stations and bus stands.

Measures to provide for full accessibility is built into all new public transport infrastructure projects and vehicles from the design stage are fully accessible. In this regard my Department provides funding to the NTA for a rolling programme of bus replacement and refurbishment of the Dublin Bus and Bus Éireann PSO fleets both in the Greater Dublin Area and nationally.  

This has enabled 100% of the Dublin Bus and Bus Éireann city fleets to be wheelchair accessible, as well as approximately 65% of Bus Éireann coaches (which are wheelchair accessible by lift) and this will increase as the coach fleet is replaced.

My Department also funds an on-going programme of accessibility improvement grants to upgrade existing public transport infrastructure and facilities. This includes funding for accessible bus stops & bus stations.  I understand that during 2016 the NTA will begin the installation of wheelchair accessible bus stops across the Bus Éireann network and that this will be done on a route-by-route basis.

Noting the NTA's responsibility in the matter, I have referred the Deputy's question to the NTA for a more detailed reply. Please advise my private office if you do not receive a reply within ten working days.

Roads Maintenance

Questions (633)

Fergus O'Dowd

Question:

633. Deputy Fergus O'Dowd asked the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport if he is willing to release the funding necessary to expedite the R150 Laytown to Bettystown spine road project due to the very large number of young children in educational campuses in the area and the significant safety concerns that continue due to not having this spine road in place (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [19126/16]

View answer

Written answers

The improvement and maintenance of regional and local roads in Co. Meath is the statutory responsibility of Meath County Council, in accordance with the provisions of Section 13 of the Roads Act 1993. Works on those roads are funded from the Council's own resources supplemented by State road grants.

The Capital Plan 2016-2021 provides that a number of schemes targeting bottlenecks in the road network will be progressed subject to necessary approvals. The R150 Laytown to Bettystown Spine road is one of the projects included in the Capital Plan, subject to necessary approvals including planning. I understand that Meath County Council is liaising with my officials in relation to the project, including the timescale for implementation. An allocation of €50,000 has made in relation to the project this year. All available grant funding for 2016 has now been allocated.

Road Projects Status

Questions (634)

Pat Buckley

Question:

634. Deputy Pat Buckley asked the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport if and when he will progress the M20 project and if not, his plans to improve road infrastructure in the region. [19138/16]

View answer

Written answers

The transport element of the Capital Plan published in September 2015 provided for some targeted investment in a number of new projects in the Munster region including the N8/N25 Dunkettle Interchange and the N22 Ballyvourney to Macroom schemes. In addition, a number of other schemes targeted at removing bottlenecks and upgrading port access, will commence subject to development consent. These include the Mallow Relief Road, Adare By-Pass  and the N28 Cork to Ringaskiddy Road. It was not possible to include the M20 in the Capital Plan as the scale of investment to deliver it as originally proposed was not affordable.

However, as part of its work on the proposed Mallow Relief Road, Transport Infrastructure Ireland (TII) is examining whether the Mallow project can be progressed in such a way that it facilitates the development of the N20 in phases. If work on that project and additional studies show that a phased approach is feasible, the N20 upgrade could be considered as part of the planned mid-term review of the Capital Plan. In the meantime, TII is funding a feasibility study on the proposed Mallow Relief Road this year.

Road Signage

Questions (635)

Maurice Quinlivan

Question:

635. Deputy Maurice Quinlivan asked the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport to explain the absence of a signpost for Castleconnell at junction 27 of the M7 motorway, which is the last junction before motorists from Dublin would bypass the tourist village; and the steps he will take without delay to correct this anomaly. [19180/16]

View answer

Written answers

As Minister for Transport,Tourism & Sport I have responsibility for overall policy and  funding in relation to the national roads programme. The planning, design and implementation of individual national road projects (and the provision of signage on them) is a matter for Transport Infrastructure Ireland (TII) under the Roads Acts 1993-2015.

Noting the above position, I have referred the Deputy’s question to TII for direct reply. Please advise my private office if you don’t receive a reply within 10 working days.

Road Safety

Questions (636)

Seán Fleming

Question:

636. Deputy Sean Fleming asked the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport the position regarding speed limits in housing estates that have not yet been taken in charge by local authorities; the speed limits that apply in these areas; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [19182/16]

View answer

Written answers

The taking in charge of housing estate roads by local authorities is provided for under section 11 of the Roads Act, 1993. Where there is an undue delay by a road authority in taking a road in charge, there is provision under section 180 of the Planning Act 2000 for a majority of the qualified electors, who own or occupy the houses within the estate in question, to require the road authority to initiate proceedings under section 11 of the Roads Act, 1993.

While certain traffic laws apply to public places generally, such as estates that have not been taken in charge, this is not the case in respect of speed limits, as these are provided for under the legislation governing public roads. My Department is currently considering, with the assistance of the Office of the Attorney General, the possible application of speed limits elsewhere than on public roads, having regard to not only road safety but also enforcement and other relevant legal issues.

Where local authorities have taken housing estates in charge, they may, as part of the measures to improve road safety, go through the process of adopting bye-laws for the 30km/h limit for roads within the estates. As the Deputy may be aware, 30km/h is a special speed limit and statutory responsibility for setting such limit in respect of any specific road is vested in local authorities under section 9 of the Road Traffic Act 2004 and requires a public consultation process followed by a decision by the Elected Members. 

I am also making provision for an additional speed limit of 20km/h in the Road Traffic Bill 2016 which is due to be passed into law later this year. This will then be available, along with the 30km/h limit, for implementation by local authorities in specific areas, including housing estates, following the required public consultation.

Rail Network Expansion

Questions (637)

Joan Burton

Question:

637. Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport the timeframe for the electrification of the Dublin to Maynooth railway line as proposed in the capital programme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [19262/16]

View answer

Written answers

The NTA's Transport Strategy for the Greater Dublin Area (GDA) 2016-2035, which was approved and published earlier this year, proposes implementation of the DART Expansion Programme which will provide DART services as far north as Drogheda; to Hazelhatch on the Kildare Line and to Maynooth in the west and to the M3 Parkway.

As required under the Dublin Transport Authority Act, 2008, the NTA is now drawing up an integrated implementation plan to outline how they will go about delivering upon the Strategy's objectives over the first 6 year period. This plan will be subject to a consultation period and will then be submitted for my approval before the end of the year.

Funding for some elements of the DART Expansion Programme is included in the Capital Plan which was published in September last year. Specifically, funding is provided for the extension of the DART to Balbriggan on the Northern line. The remaining elements of the DART Expansion programme will be examined under future capital funding reviews and in line with the NTA's Integrated Implementation Plans for delivery of the Transport Strategy for the GDA.

Dublin Bus

Questions (638)

Joan Burton

Question:

638. Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport if he has received any report from Dublin Bus on the results of having revenue protection officers board buses at random; the scale of fare evasion noted; the level of improper use of free travel passes that has been observed; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [19263/16]

View answer

Written answers

I have not received any report from Dublin Bus on the issues raised by the Deputy.

However, I understand that Dublin Bus regularly report revenue protection returns to the National Transport Authority (NTA) as set out in the company's Public Service Obligation Contract and I have forwarded the Deputy's question to the NTA for direct reply. Please advise my private office if you do not receive a response within ten working days.

Public Transport Initiatives

Questions (639)

Joan Burton

Question:

639. Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport the status of the plans for the Swiftway rapid bus services in particular the proposed Blanchardstown to University College Dublin route; when the service will become operational; if a final route has been chosen; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [19264/16]

View answer

Written answers

The National Transport Authority (NTA) has statutory responsibility for the development and implementation of public transport infrastructure in the Greater Dublin Area (GDA), including Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) projects.

The NTA's Transport Strategy for the Greater Dublin Area (GDA) 2016-2035 was approved by my predecessor, Minister Donohoe, in February 2016. It includes proposals for two specific bus rapid transit (BRT) schemes, Blanchardstown to UCD and Clongriffin to Tallaght.  As required under the Dublin Transport Authority Act, 2008, the NTA is now drawing up an integrated implmentation plan to outline how it will go about delivering upon the Strategy's objectives over the first 6 year period within the Strategy's overall 20-year horizon. This implementation plan will be subject to a consultation period and will then be submitted by the NTA for my approval before the end of the year.

Funding is being made available for initial planning and design work for the Blanchardstown to UCD and Clongriffin to Tallaght BRT schemes under the Government's Capital Plan 'Building on Recovery Infrastructure & Capital Investment 2016-2021' . I understand from the NTA that they are currently finalising tender documents to progress the design and planning of the Blanchardstown to UCD scheme and the route option selection for the Clongriffin to Tallaght BRT scheme.

Implementation of these schemes will be progressed on an incremental basis in accordance with available funding.

Roads Maintenance

Questions (640)

Maurice Quinlivan

Question:

640. Deputy Maurice Quinlivan asked the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport if there is a policy whereby when footpaths are being upgraded disabled ramps and a designated parking spot are included in the plans; if there is a specific fund allocated to local authorities to provide disabled parking spots in rural towns in County Limerick; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [19400/16]

View answer

Written answers

The construction, improvement and maintenance of regional and local roads is the statutory responsibility of each road authority, in accordance with the provisions of Section 13 of the Roads Act 1993. Works on those roads are funded from road authorities' own resources supplemented by State road grants. The initial selection and prioritisation of works to be funded is also a matter for the relevant road authority, in this case Limerick City and County Council. While there is no specific grant for the provision of disabled parking bays, it is open to road authorities to use the discretionary grant, provided by my Department for regional and local roads, for measures which improve accessibility, including ramps and disabled parking bays.

In my Department's Memorandum on Grants for Regional and Local Roads, road authorities are urged to pay particular attention to the needs of persons with disabilities in planning and executing road works, including the provision of dished kerbs and wheelchair ramps at pedestrian crossing points. Advice regarding the provision of and specifications for disabled parking bays is set out in Chapter 7 of my Department's Traffic Signs Manual.

Sports Capital Programme Administration

Questions (641)

James Lawless

Question:

641. Deputy James Lawless asked the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport the grants and financial supports available to a voluntary sporting organisation (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [19490/16]

View answer

Written answers

No decision has been made on the timing of any future rounds of the Sports Capital Programme.

Any interested group should register online now at www.sportscapitalprogramme.ie as this portal will be the only way to apply under any future rounds of the Programme. I note that the organisation referred to by the Deputy is not currently registered.

Road Projects

Questions (642)

Kevin O'Keeffe

Question:

642. Deputy Kevin O'Keeffe asked the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport if he will clarify the proposal to develop a motorway between Limerick and Mitchelstown by Transport Infrastructure Ireland as opposed to the development of a motorway between Limerick and Cork; and if he will provide full details of this proposal. [19508/16]

View answer

Written answers

As Minister for Transport,Tourism & Sport I have responsibility for overall policy and funding in relation to the national roads programme. The planning, design and implementation of individual national road projects is a matter for Transport Infrastructure Ireland (TII) under the Roads Acts 1993-2015 in conjunction with the relevant local authorities.

Noting the above position, I have referred the Deputy’s question to TII for direct reply. Please advise my private office if you don’t receive a reply within 10 working days.

Road Signage

Questions (643)

Imelda Munster

Question:

643. Deputy Imelda Munster asked the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport the reason for the absence of a signpost for Castleconnell at junction 27 of the M7; his plans to deal with the matter; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [19549/16]

View answer

Written answers

As Minister for Transport,Tourism & Sport I have responsibility for overall policy and funding in relation to the national roads programme. The planning, design and implementation of individual national road projects (and the provision of signage on them) is a matter for  Transport Infrastructure Ireland (TII) under the Roads Acts 1993-2015 in conjunction with the local authorities concerned.

Noting the above position, I have referred the Deputy’s question to TII for direct reply. Please advise my private office if you don’t receive a reply within 10 working days.

Departmental Records

Questions (644)

Niamh Smyth

Question:

644. Deputy Niamh Smyth asked the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport the number of staff employed in his Department's Archive Unit in each of the years 2010 to 2016 to date, in tabular form; his plans to expand this number; if there are protocol changes arising from changes to the National Archive Acts; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [19624/16]

View answer

Written answers

My Department does not have a dedicated National Archives Unit. Responsibility for the oversight of the Department's duties under the National Archive Act 1986 and related National Archive Regulations is managed as part of the overall wider responsibilities of the Department's Policy and Governance Coordination Division.

 Under Departmental procedures for the management of national archives, each Head of Function is designated as a Certifying Officer with responsibility for discharging statutory national archive obligations within her/his functional area. These functional areas together cover all aspects of the Department's functions.

The Department's procedures and oversight arrangements, including staffing needs, will continue to be kept under review in light of evolving circumstances, including any new legislative requirements.

Road Projects

Questions (645)

Fergus O'Dowd

Question:

645. Deputy Fergus O'Dowd asked the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport the position regarding the access allowed by Transport Infrastructure Ireland to private service providers to ducting along the M1, M2 and M3 motorways for the provision of broadband and telecommunications services; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [19649/16]

View answer

Written answers

As Minister for Transport,Tourism & Sport I have responsibility for overall policy and funding in relation to the national roads programme. The planning, design and implementation of individual national road projects(and the provision of ducting on them) is a matter for Transport Infrastructure Ireland (TII).

Noting the above position, I have referred the Deputy’s question to TII for direct reply. Please advise my private office if you don’t receive a reply within 10 working days.

Departmental Meetings

Questions (646)

Brendan Smith

Question:

646. Deputy Brendan Smith asked the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport to consider a request from a local authority (details supplied). [19692/16]

View answer

Written answers

All meeting requests which my office receive are given due consideration while bearing in mind all the demands of my Ministerial role.

Sports Capital Programme

Questions (647)

Willie Penrose

Question:

647. Deputy Willie Penrose asked the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport when he will announce a sports capital programme so as to enable clubs and organisations to apply for funding to upgrade and refurbish their facilities; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [19789/16]

View answer

Written answers

No decision has been made on the timing of any future rounds of the Sports Capital Programme.

Any interested group should register online now at www.sportscapitalprogramme.ie as this portal will be the only way to apply under any future rounds of the Programme.

International Agreements

Questions (648, 649, 650, 651, 652, 653, 654, 655, 656, 657, 658, 665, 666, 667, 668, 669, 670, 671, 672, 673, 674)

Thomas Pringle

Question:

648. Deputy Thomas Pringle asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation the date on which the European Commission will present a proposal to the Council of Ministers asking the Council to vote to give the Commission the authority to sign off on the final text of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, CETA, with the Canadian Government that is to adopt a decision concluding the agreement as per TFEU Article 218.6; when the Government will get access to this proposal to conclude CETA; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [19571/16]

View answer

Thomas Pringle

Question:

649. Deputy Thomas Pringle asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation if she will make public the Commission’s Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, CETA, proposal prior to the Council’s vote on it; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [19572/16]

View answer

Thomas Pringle

Question:

650. Deputy Thomas Pringle asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation if she will make public the Government's position as to provisionally applying the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, CETA, (details supplied); and if she will make a statement on the matter. [19573/16]

View answer

Thomas Pringle

Question:

651. Deputy Thomas Pringle asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation if her attention has been drawn to the fact that Article 29.5.2 of the Constitution places a constitutional imperative on the State to have any international agreement involving a charge upon public funds approved by Dáil Éireann and that as such, should the Council of Ministers vote by a qualified majority vote to approve the signing and provisional application of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, CETA, considering the investor state dispute settlement, ISDS, mechanism of CETA is designed specifically to allow for a charge upon public funds, this would create a constitutional crisis for Ireland and the EU, whereby Ireland, as an EU member state, could be the subject of ISDS cases which lead to a charge upon public funds prior to Dáil Éireann approving the CETA; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [19574/16]

View answer

Thomas Pringle

Question:

652. Deputy Thomas Pringle asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation the way the Government can claim that CETA and its investor state dispute settlement, ISDS, will not be enforced upon Ireland prior to the CETA being approved by Dáil Éireann (details supplied); and if she will make a statement on the matter. [19575/16]

View answer

Thomas Pringle

Question:

653. Deputy Thomas Pringle asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation the necessity test (details supplied) being used to inform the Government's thinking on the provisional application of CETA; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [19576/16]

View answer

Thomas Pringle

Question:

654. Deputy Thomas Pringle asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation the way the Government can explain its position that the ISDS of CETA is compatible with EU law (details supplied); and if she will make a statement on the matter. [19577/16]

View answer

Thomas Pringle

Question:

655. Deputy Thomas Pringle asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation if the Government will explain its position that the ISDS of CETA is compatible with EU law; the reason the Government does not invoke Article 218.11 of the TFEU and ask the ECJ to deliver a legal ruling as to whether or not ISDS is compatible with EU law (details supplied); and if she will make a statement on the matter. [19578/16]

View answer

Thomas Pringle

Question:

656. Deputy Thomas Pringle asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation the way on the one hand intra-EU bilateral investment treaties with investor-state dispute settlement, ISDS, promote discrimination based on nationality, but somehow, in a post Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement legal landscape, allowing Canadian businesses or EU-businesses with a Canadian owner, to have privileged access to a legal remedy, namely ISDS, does not allow for discrimination based on nationality (details supplied). [19579/16]

View answer

Thomas Pringle

Question:

657. Deputy Thomas Pringle asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation the reason for the Government's support for the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement and its investor-state dispute settlement (details supplied); and if she will make a statement on the matter. [19580/16]

View answer

Thomas Pringle

Question:

658. Deputy Thomas Pringle asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation the way the Government intends to protect Irish citizens from the European Union Commission’s proposal to provisionally apply the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, CETA, prior to a definitive legal ruling as to the distribution of competences relating to new proposals to subject the EU to an investor-state dispute settlement under the CETA; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [19581/16]

View answer

Paul Murphy

Question:

665. Deputy Paul Murphy asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation the date on which the European Commission will present a proposal to the Council of Ministers asking the Council to vote to give the Commission the authority to sign-off on the final text of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement with the Canadian government (details supplied); and if she will make a statement on the matter. [19595/16]

View answer

Paul Murphy

Question:

666. Deputy Paul Murphy asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation when the Government gets access to the wording of the proposal to conclude the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement; if she will make public the Commission’s proposal prior to the Council of Ministers' vote on the agreement; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [19596/16]

View answer

Paul Murphy

Question:

667. Deputy Paul Murphy asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation if she will publish the position as to provisionally applying the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [19597/16]

View answer

Paul Murphy

Question:

668. Deputy Paul Murphy asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation if she is aware that Article 29.5.2 of the Constitution places an imperative on the State to have any international agreement involving a charge upon public funds to be approved by Dáil Éireann and that as such, should the Council of Ministers vote by a qualified majority vote to approve the signing and provisional application of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, and considering the investor-state dispute settlement mechanism of the agreement is designed specifically to allow for a charge upon public funds, this would be in breach of the Constitution, whereby Ireland could be the subject of settlement cases which lead to a charge upon public funds prior to Dáil Éireann approving the agreement; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [19598/16]

View answer

Paul Murphy

Question:

669. Deputy Paul Murphy asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation how she can assert that the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement and the investor state dispute settlement will not be enforced upon Ireland prior to Dáil Éirean approving the agreement (details supplied); and if she will make a statement on the matter. [19599/16]

View answer

Paul Murphy

Question:

670. Deputy Paul Murphy asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation the necessity test being used to inform the Government position on the provisional application of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (details supplied); and if she will make a statement on the matter. [19600/16]

View answer

Paul Murphy

Question:

671. Deputy Paul Murphy asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation if she will explain her position that the investor state dispute settlement of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement is compatible with European Union law; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [19601/16]

View answer

Paul Murphy

Question:

672. Deputy Paul Murphy asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation if she will explain her position that the investor state dispute settlement of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement is compatible with European Union law; and why she does not invoke Article 218.11 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and ask the European Court of Justice to deliver a legal ruling as to whether or not the settlement is compatible with European Union law; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [19602/16]

View answer

Paul Murphy

Question:

673. Deputy Paul Murphy asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation how intra-European Union bilateral investment treaty solutions with the investor-state dispute settlement promote discrimination based on nationality, but in a post-Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement legal landscape allowing Canadian businesses or European Union businesses with a Canadian owner to have privileged access to a legal remedy, namely the settlement, somehow does not allow for discrimination based on nationality; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [19603/16]

View answer

Paul Murphy

Question:

674. Deputy Paul Murphy asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation how she intends to protect Irish citizens from the EU Commission’s proposal to provisionally apply the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement prior to a definitive legal ruling as to the distribution of competences relating to new proposals to subject the European Union to an investor-state dispute settlement under the agreement; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [19604/16]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 648 to 658, inclusive, and 665 to 674, inclusive, together.

The EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic Trade Agreement (CETA) is a new generation agreement that will remove over 99% of tariffs between the EU and Canada and will create sizeable new market access opportunities in services and investment. It will end limitations in access to public contracts, open-up services market, and offer predictable conditions for investors.

The EU-Canada Agreement will save on duty costs as 99.6% of all industrial tariffs will be eliminated on entry into force. Irish firms will also benefit from the recognition of product standards and certification, thus saving on ‘double testing’ on both sides of the Atlantic. These are some of the benefits of the trade deal with Canada as well as providing new market opportunities in many sectors for Irish firms.

In May this year, the Council had an exchange of views on the EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) and the process towards signature and provisional application of the agreement. The European Commission and Member States highlighted the high quality of the agreement reached with Canada and expressed the desire to work towards signature of the agreement at the October EU-Canada Summit. The Commission advised the Council of its intention to submit a proposal for a decision on signature of CETA before the Summer. I understand that the Commission will adopt their proposal this week. It is a matter for the EU Commission to decide if they wish to publish their proposal.

There are differing views on the legal position on competence and the CETA. The European Commission is of the view that CETA falls within the competence of the EU only. We will need to wait and see the formal proposal from the Commission and, importantly, the legal basis for this. It will be a matter for the Council and the European Parliament to decide on the signature and provisional application of CETA.

The provisions of the CETA on investment dispute resolution relate solely to the CETA as an international trade agreement. Such trade agreements are not part of domestic law. This is why separate adjudication arrangements are required in the event of disputes under the agreement.

Top
Share