Skip to main content
Normal View

Tuesday, 3 Oct 2017

Written Answers Nos. 102-121

Universal Social Charge Application

Questions (102)

Richard Boyd Barrett

Question:

102. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Finance if he will consider in his pre-budget deliberations with regard to the USC, the correction of the anomaly that sees pre-1995 public sector pensioners pay the universal social charge on all their income while all other recipients of the State pension are exempt from USC on that portion of their income, resulting in the pre-1995 pensioners being worse off than other pensioners who receive the State pension; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41269/17]

View answer

Written answers

The Universal Social Charge, USC, was introduced in Budget 2011 to replace the Income Levy and Health Levy. It was a necessary measure to widen the tax base, remove poverty traps and maintain revenue to reduce the budget deficit. It is a more sustainable charge than those it replaced and is applied at a low rate on a wide base. However, the base for USC does not include payments made by the Department of Social Protection, including the State pension.

As the Deputy may be aware, the USC was reviewed by my Department in 2011 and the issue of USC applying to occupational pensions of retired public service who entered the public service before April 1995 was examined as part of that review. Such individuals are (or were) liable to modified rate PRSI, which does not generate an entitlement to the State Pension. In retirement, therefore, they receive an occupational pension only, and do not receive a separate State Pension unless as a result of PRSI contributions made in another employment during their working life.

It was decided not to exempt the occupational pensions of these individuals from the USC charge as an exemption would be very costly and difficult to achieve, and it could involve all income earners with the equivalent income benefiting from the exemption. In addition, it would also undermine the principle of the USC being applied to income with few exceptions.

However, as a result of the review of the USC, in Budget 2012 the entry threshold to USC was increased from €4,004 to €10,036 per annum, and the threshold was subsequently increased further in Budgets 2015 and 2016, to the current threshold of €13,000. This exemption threshold equalises the position for single individuals whose sole source of income is the State Contributory Pension with Public Service pensioners whose pension is at an equivalent level. It is estimated, based on the current rates and bands, that almost 770,000 income earners are exempt from the USC.

The Government has committed to continue the process of reducing the personal tax burden in future Budgets, with a particular focus on low and middle-income earners, subject to having the required fiscal space. In this context, I have stated on a number of occasions that my long term view of the USC is to see its amalgamation with the existing PRSI system. This is a complex undertaking that will take time to plan and implement, and will require further consideration of all the distinct features of the USC and PRSI systems, including the taxation of pre-95 public servants.

Financial Services Regulation

Questions (103)

Michael McGrath

Question:

103. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the detail of the Central Bank inquiry into a building society (details supplied) currently under way; the work that has been done to date; the costs incurred to date; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41281/17]

View answer

Written answers

Under Part IIIC of the Central Bank Act 1942 (as amended) (“the Act”), the Central Bank may hold an inquiry to determine whether or not a financial service provider is committing or has committed a suspected prescribed contravention. The Central Bank may also hold an inquiry to determine whether or not a person concerned in the management of a regulated financial service provider is participating or has participated in the commission of a suspected prescribed contravention by the financial service provider.

Part IIIC of the Act sets out the framework for how Administrative Sanctions Procedures inquiries are to be carried out. The Central Bank has prescribed Inquiry Guidelines in order to set out the general procedure which it ordinarily proposes to follow at an Administrative Sanctions Procedures inquiry (available here: https://www.centralbank.ie/docs/default-source/Regulation/enforcement/administrative-sanctions-procedure/legislation-and-guidance/inquiry-guidelines-2014.pdf?sfvrsn=2).

The Central Bank has appointed an Inquiry Panel, from which Inquiry Members will be appointed in individual cases to be referred to Inquiry pursuant to Part IIIC of the Central Bank Act, 1942. The list of the Inquiry Panel is available here: https://www.centralbank.ie/news-media/legal-notices/inquiry-hearings/inquiry-panel.

The Inquiry Members who have been appointed to conduct an inquiry decide how it will proceed and the procedures to be followed. The Guidelines provide that the Inquiry Members may decide to hold inquiry management meetings in order to assist in the timely and efficient running of the inquiry and to ensure that the issues to be determined at inquiry are narrowed to the greatest extent possible.

Inquiry hearings, including inquiry management meetings, may be held in public or in private; this is determined by the Inquiry Members. Notices in relation to meetings are published on the Central Bank’s website. Where a meeting is to be held in public, its date, time and location are published on the Central Bank's website (available here: https://www.centralbank.ie/news-media/legal-notices/inquiry-hearings).

The three Inquiry members appointed in the INBS Inquiry are Marian Shanley (Chairperson), Ciara McGoldrick and Geoffrey McEnery.

As this Inquiry, and civil proceedings with respect to the inquiry are ongoing, the Central Bank is not commenting at this stage on the Inquiry or on costs incurred in relation to the Inquiry.

Help-To-Buy Scheme Assessment

Questions (104)

Michael McGrath

Question:

104. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance if he will address a query raised in correspondence by a person (details supplied) in County Cork regarding the help-to-buy scheme. [41315/17]

View answer

Written answers

As the Deputy will be aware, one of the central policy aims of the Help to Buy initiative is to help make mortgages more accessible to first-time buyers, many of whom have difficulty securing the required deposit under the Central Bank macro-prudential rules. Individuals who are in a position to avail of a mortgage at a lower loan-to-value ratio than 70% are considered to have sufficient resources to more than meet the deposit requirements of the macro-prudential rules and thus are less in need of assistance from the Exchequer.

Based on the information supplied by the Deputy, it is unclear as to how his constituent's property is being valued for the purposes of Help to Buy. However, I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that if the Deputy could provide all relevant details around the circumstances of any particular relevant property purchase to them, they will arrange to have the matter looked into.

Tax Code

Questions (105)

Noel Rock

Question:

105. Deputy Noel Rock asked the Minister for Finance the progress in discussions with the Brazilian authorities to remove the State from a blacklist of tax havens; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41349/17]

View answer

Written answers

Efforts are continuing to seek Ireland’s removal from the Brazilian black list. A technical delegation from the Department of Finance and Revenue met with Brazilian officials earlier this year to seek a resolution to this issue. Since then, there has been continuing contact with the Brazilian authorities at official level. The issue was also raised directly with the Brazilian Finance Minister by my predecessor. Ireland’s appeal of the listing remains under consideration pending a final decision from the Brazilian Revenue Secretary. Our Ambassador in Brazil continues to follow up with the Brazilian Revenue on the issue.

Brazilian Revenue have made clear that they do not consider Ireland to be a tax haven. Ireland has been included on this Brazilian list on the basis that our 12.5% corporation tax rate is below 17%, the threshold set by Brazilian law. We believe that focusing on the statutory tax rate fails to reflect the realities of the Irish regime which focusses on substance and which also has a 25% rate for passive income and a 33% rate for capital gains.

Legislative Programme

Questions (106)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

106. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance the items listed in the legislative programme for his Department; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41413/17]

View answer

Written answers

The Government Legislative Programme was published by the Chief Whip Joe McHugh T.D. on 19 September following consultation with the Attorney General and Government Departments including the Department of Finance.

My Department has three items included on the list of Priority Legislation for Publication this session. The title and purpose of each of those Bills is set out in the following table:

Title

Purpose

Finance Bill

To give legislative form to taxation proposals in Budget 2018

Insurance (Amendment) Bill

To amend the Insurance Act 1964 in order to implement the recommendations of the Review of the Framework for Motor Insurance Compensation in Ireland Report

Market in Financial Instruments Bill

This bill is part of the transposition of the Market in Financial Instruments Directive II into national law

My Department has five Bills included on the list of Priority Legislation for Pre-Legislative Scrutiny this session. The title and purpose of each of those Bills is set out in the following table:

Title

Purpose

Credit Union Restructuring Board Dissolution Bill

To dissolve the Credit Union Restructuring Board and to transfer its assets and liabilities (if any) to the Minister for Finance

Insurance (Amendment) Bill

To amend the Insurance Act 1964 in order to implement the recommendations of the Review of the Framework for Motor Insurance Compensation in Ireland Report

Investment Limited Partnership and Irish Collective Asset-management Vehicle (Amendment) Bill

To support the development of the private equity fund industry by making Ireland a more attractive domicile for such funds. This objective has also been included in the IFS 2020 Action Plan 2016 which commits to developing amendments to the Investment Limited Partnership Act 1994 to make the structure more attractive to fund managers

Market in Financial Instruments Bill

This bill is part of the transposition of the Market in Financial Instruments Directive II into national law

National Claims Information Database Bill

To provide powers to the Central Bank to maintain a database to carry out statistical analysis of movements in insurance claims costs/trends

My Department has two Bills on the list of All Other Legislation. The title and purpose of each of those Bills is set out in the following table:

Title

Purpose

Central Bank Consolidation Bill

To consolidate the corpus of the Central Bank Acts into one statute

Taxation and Certain Other Matters (International Mutual Assistance) Bill

To transpose elements of the OECD Mutual Convention on Administrative Assistance and the EU/Switzerland Anti-Fraud Agreement

Banking Sector

Questions (107)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

107. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance the fees paid by banks in which he holds shares to solicitors and barristers with regard to mortgage arrears cases, by legal professional; the fees paid to them in each year since 2011, in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41420/17]

View answer

Written answers

As the banks in which the State is a shareholder are independent commercial entities, I as Minister do not have a role in their strategic or operational management. The information requested by the Deputy is therefore not held in my Department.

I have asked the relevant institutions to respond to the Deputy's request.

AIB:

"For commercial confidentiality reasons AIB does not publicly disclose the details of contracts with individual external service providers. The bank manages legal fees within its commercial business requirements and operating costs."

Bank of Ireland:

"The Bank of Ireland Group makes detailed disclosures to the market in relation to operating expenses in Annual and Interim Reports, the most recent being the Interim Report for the first six months of 2017 published on July 28 last. However, the information requested is not a component of these disclosures."

PTSB:

"Permanent TSB has a requirement for legal support and advice on an on-going basis across different parts of its business. It manages some of this requirement through its in-house legal function, as well as engaging external solicitors and barristers where necessary. Except where required by law or regulation, and in line with how it manages its relationships with its other third-party advisors, the bank does not disclose the identity of such firms or individuals engaged to work with the bank on specific issues or the terms of such work as this information is deemed commercially sensitive."

Cycle to Work Scheme

Questions (108)

Maureen O'Sullivan

Question:

108. Deputy Maureen O'Sullivan asked the Minister for Finance if he will reduce the eligibility time for the cycle to work scheme from five years to three years; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41496/17]

View answer

Written answers

The Deputy will be aware that it is not the practice of the Minister for Finance to discuss the details of measures which may be under consideration as part of the Budget and Finance Bill.

Fuel Prices

Questions (109)

Maureen O'Sullivan

Question:

109. Deputy Maureen O'Sullivan asked the Minister for Finance his plans to address the difference between the price of diesel and petrol for private motor cars in view of the implications for air pollution and carbon emissions; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41497/17]

View answer

Written answers

It is the long-standing practice of Ministers for Finance not to comment on what may be contained in upcoming budgets.

Vehicle Registration

Questions (110)

Maria Bailey

Question:

110. Deputy Maria Bailey asked the Minister for Finance the reason the Revenue Commissioners are refusing to register used and already registered vehicles as N1 vehicles with two or more rows of seats, having been previously converted from an M1 category vehicle in circumstances, in which the applicant has submitted all necessary documentation relating to the conversion as listed on the Revenue Commissioner's website, and which has been signed by a test centre authorised by the National Standards Authority of Ireland; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41507/17]

View answer

Written answers

I am informed by Revenue that all vehicles that are type approved by the relevant competent body as M1 or N1 vehicles are registered by Revenue as M1 or N1 vehicles.

Following the introduction of a laser measurement system in 2016, the National Standards Authority of Ireland, NSAI, provided Revenue with a list of new vehicles that they had measured and that did not qualify as N1 vehicles. The NSAI will not certify these vehicles as N1 when presented as new and, therefore, Revenue, when presented with the same vehicle models as used, will not register them as N1 vehicles.

NAMA Debtor Agreements

Questions (111)

Barry Cowen

Question:

111. Deputy Barry Cowen asked the Minister for Finance the sum advanced to developers by NAMA in loans; the percentage of this sum currently repaid; the quantum of loans in arrears; and the percentage of loans in arrears. [41516/17]

View answer

Written answers

In order to meet its primary objective of obtaining the best achievable financial return for the State from its acquired loans, NAMA may provide funding to its debtors and receivers to protect and enhance their assets so as to optimise their income-producing potential and disposal value.

Since inception, NAMA has advanced loans to its debtors and receivers for a range of purposes, primarily for capital expenditure purposes but also for essential current expenditure required to protect the value of assets including remedial works, health and safety requirements, security and insurance.

The Deputy will be aware that NAMA’s objectives include facilitating the delivery of Grade A office accommodation in the Dublin Docklands SDZ and facilitating the delivery of up to 20,000 new residential units to the end of 2020, subject to commercial viability. To meet these objectives, significant capital expenditure has been invested in assets with the expectation that they will generate an enhanced return for taxpayers.

I am advised that in order to achieve these objectives, NAMA has advanced €3.6 billion in funds to its debtors and receivers from inception to August 2017, comprising both current and capital expenditure. I am further advised that the majority of loans have been repaid either by the debtor or by the proceeds of loan sales. I am advised that, of new funding advanced since 2010, €0.6 billion (17%) is currently outstanding to NAMA and is being actively managed by the Agency, as it relates to debtors whose loans are still held by NAMA.

NAMA advise that, of the €3.6 billion advanced to NAMA debtors and receivers, €0.2 billion is unlikely to be repaid as it primarily relates to necessary expenditure to protect and maintain secured assets including Health and Safety works.

Insurance Costs

Questions (112)

Mattie McGrath

Question:

112. Deputy Mattie McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the progress that has been made in implementing the recommendations of the Oireachtas Joint Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform, and Taoiseach report on the rising costs of car insurance; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41522/17]

View answer

Written answers

The Cost of Insurance Working Group – which is now chaired by Minister of State Mr. Michael D’Arcy T.D. – finalised its report on the Cost of Motor Insurance in December 2016 and it was published on 10 January 2017. The report makes 33 recommendations with 71 associated actions to be carried out in agreed timeframes, set out in an action plan within the report.

The Joint Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform, and Taoiseach, conducted its own review of the rising cost of motor insurance and published its report in November 2016.

I am of the view that considerable overlaps exist between the two reports. Therefore in implementing the recommendations of the report on the Cost of Motor Insurance, the Government has been addressing many of the recommendations contained in the Joint Committee's Report, including in such key areas as:

- Consumer protection – e.g., providing breakdown of the calculation/increase in premiums, improving conditions for returning emigrants, etc;

- Enhancing transparency in the claims environment – e.g., establishing a National Claims Information Database, improving the quality of data in the Book of Quantum, etc.;

- Counteracting uninsured driving and fraud – e.g., establishing fully-functional databases in respect of uninsured drivers and insurance fraud, expediting the development of the Master Licence Record, etc.

Work is ongoing on the implementation of the recommendations by the relevant Government Departments and Agencies and there is a commitment within the Report on the Cost of Motor Insurance that the Working Group will prepare quarterly updates on its progress. The second such update was published on the Department’s website on 21 July 2017 and shows the progress to date on the overall implementation of the recommendations, with a particular focus on the 17 action points which were due for completion in the second quarter of 2017. All 17 of these action points have been completed by this deadline. In total, all but one of the 27 action points due in the first two quarters of the year have been completed. Substantial work has also been undertaken in respect of the nine action points categorised as “ongoing”. The third quarterly update will issue in the coming weeks.

I believe that the continued implementation of the Report on the Cost of Motor Insurance will make a difference to the pricing of insurance premiums over the next 12-18 months. It is envisaged that the implementation of all the recommendations cumulatively, with the appropriate levels of commitment and cooperation from all relevant stakeholders, will achieve the objective of delivering fairer premiums for consumers. I also believe that the Setanta judgment, by finding that MIBI is not liable to meet third-party claims, removes a major uncertainty from industry, which I would expect to be reflected in pricing in the short to medium term.

In this regard, it should be noted that the most recent CSO data (for August) indicates that private motor insurance premiums have reduced by 14% year-on-year. While the CSO statistics indicate a greater degree of stability on an overall basis, these figures represent a broad average and therefore there are many people who may still be seeing increases. However, I am hopeful that this greater stability in pricing will be maintained with the result that premiums should continue to fall from the very high levels of last year.

Tax Code

Questions (113)

Paul Murphy

Question:

113. Deputy Paul Murphy asked the Minister for Finance his views on the recent speech by the French President (details supplied) in which he called for access to structural funds to be linked with co-operation on a European corporation tax policy by 2020; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41562/17]

View answer

Written answers

I note the recent speech delivered by the French President to which the question refers.

In respect of Ireland's cooperation on corporation tax policy within Europe, Ireland has been very actively engaged with corporate tax proposals at EU level. Ireland played an important part in the negotiation and agreement of several significant tax directives, including the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directives, the several amendments to the Directive on Administrative Cooperation, as well as the recent Directive on the resolution of double taxation disputes. We are also actively involved in discussions on a number of additional directives and ongoing work on agreeing a common EU list on non-cooperative tax jurisdictions.

Ireland remains committed to global tax reform and believes that global solutions are the best approach to ensuring tax is paid by companies where value is created. That is why Ireland has been a committed participant in, and strong supporter of, tax reform efforts led by the OECD through the BEPS process. We have been active participants in EU work to effectively implement the BEPS recommendations on a consistent basis across the EU.

In his speech, President Macron mentioned corporate tax rates. Like many Member States, Ireland’s view is that the issue of tax rates remains within the competence of Member States. We are not supportive of any measure that infringes on Member State competency by moving toward harmonised tax rates.

Disabled Drivers Grant Appeals

Questions (114)

Charlie McConalogue

Question:

114. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Finance the number of primary medical certificate applications received by the disabled drivers medical board of appeal from persons in County Donegal that were granted and refused on appeal in each of the past five years to 2017; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41568/17]

View answer

Written answers

The Disabled Drivers Medical Board of Appeal is a body under the aegis of my Department. The following table shows the number of appeal applications heard in the past five years and a breakdown of the number that were successful and unsuccessful, as provided to us by the DDMBoA. It is not possible to give a breakdown by county.

Year

2017 (to June)

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

Total Number of applicants assessed

279

360

328

338

335

404

Number of successful applicants

10

22

16

44

53

45

Number of unsuccessful applicants

269

338

312

294

282

359

The following revised reply was received on 7 November 2017

The Disabled Drivers Medical Board of Appeal is a body under the aegis of my Department.  The table below shows the number of appeal applications heard in the past five years and a breakdown of the number that were successful and unsuccessful, as provided to us by the DDMBoA.  It is not possible to give a breakdown by county.

Year

2017 (to June)

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

Total Number of applicants assessed

279

360

322

338

339

409

Number of successful applicants

10

22

16

44

53

45

Number of unsuccessful applicants

269

338

306

294

286

364

Excise Duties

Questions (115)

Éamon Ó Cuív

Question:

115. Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív asked the Minister for Finance if he is examining the possibility of introducing an excise duty rebate of 50% on legally made poitín in the coming budget in order to stimulate this indigenous industry; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41593/17]

View answer

Written answers

As the Deputy will be aware, it is a longstanding practice of the Minister for Finance not to comment, in advance of the Budget, on any tax matters that might be the subject of Budget decisions.

Legislative Programme

Questions (116)

Thomas P. Broughan

Question:

116. Deputy Thomas P. Broughan asked the Minister for Finance his plans to bring forward the national claims information database Bill; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41612/17]

View answer

Written answers

Work is progressing on the National Claims Information Database Bill which will provide powers to the Central Bank to put in place a database to enable it carry out statistical analysis of movements in private motor insurance claims costs and trends.

The development of the National Claims Information Database is complex as insurers very often record data in different ways and do not necessarily use the same definitions. In recognition of this, the Department of Finance established a data sub-group at the beginning of the year. The sub-group is chaired by officials from my Department, and includes membership from the Central Bank of Ireland, the Personal Injuries Assessment Board, the State Claims Agency and the Central Statistics Office.

The sub-group has been looking at issues in relation to the development of the legislation to provide for the Database. At the same time, the Central Bank has been leading on a project to develop the technical specification of the Database and has held a number of workshop sessions to determine these precise specifications. The Society of Actuaries has input to this process. Consultation is currently being carried out with industry on these proposals.

Work on the legislative framework is at an advanced stage and it is expected that the draft Heads will be forwarded to Government for approval in the coming weeks. Once approved they will be submitted to the Office of the Parliamentary Counsel for drafting.

Finally, it should be noted that the Bill has been included on the list of Priority Legislation for Pre-Legislative Scrutiny in the Government Legislative Programme for the autumn/winter term.

Tax Exemptions

Questions (117)

John Lahart

Question:

117. Deputy John Lahart asked the Minister for Finance if tax exemptions are available to international artists who perform here; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41686/17]

View answer

Written answers

It is understood the Deputy’s question refers to the taxation position of international music artists who perform concerts in the State. I am informed by Revenue that there are no specific tax exemptions available to international artists performing in the State. Artists who are not resident in the State for tax purposes have a liability to Irish tax on income arising from the exercise of their profession in the State. However, because foreign resident artists merely have a transitory presence in the State, there are numerous practical difficulties associated with enforcing such a liability. For example, the vast majority of non-resident entertainers do not file an Irish tax return and there is therefore no effective mechanism to quantify the potential tax exposure of such entertainers on the income related to their Irish performances and to collect any tax owing. However, an alternative system which would impose an obligation on paying agents to deduct tax from payments made to foreign entertainers and account for the tax to Revenue, would also present many difficulties such as the requirement to identify the paying agent, in order to enforce collection, as well as placing a costly compliance burden, both on Revenue and the non-resident artists and paying agents. Imposing tax therefore would be administratively cumbersome relative to the potentially small prospective yield and would also undoubtedly discourage some artists from performing in the State.

I can however advise the Deputy that in general where a concert takes place in Ireland, the artists performance fee is subject to Irish VAT. Where an international performer is engaged by a promoter, it is the responsibility of the promoter to account for the VAT due on the performance fee. This means that where the promoter is established in Ireland, the promoter is required to account for Irish VAT on the performance fee. In circumstances where the artist and promoter are both established outside the State, the promoter is required to account for VAT on the performance fee where she/he is established.

Where a premises provider allows a promoter who is not established in the State to hold a concert on their premises, the provider must report details of the event to Revenue. Failure to do so can make the premises provider jointly liable for any VAT arising. This is a safeguard provision to ensure the correct VAT is collected and paid in relation to any merchandise sold at the concert venue.

Tax Code

Questions (118)

Eamon Scanlon

Question:

118. Deputy Eamon Scanlon asked the Minister for Finance if an issue relating to a PPS number for a person (details supplied) has been resolved; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41754/17]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised by Revenue that the person concerned should bring to the attention of his employer his error in providing an incorrect PPSN to them and ensure that the employment details and relevant tax credits are applied to him in line with the tax credit certificate issued by Revenue on 5 May 2017.

Tax Code

Questions (119)

Michael Lowry

Question:

119. Deputy Michael Lowry asked the Minister for Finance if it is possible to claim relief on the MED 2 form for dental treatment (details supplied). [41765/17]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised by Revenue that Section 469 of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 provides for relief at the standard rate of income tax (currently 20%) on certain health expenses incurred in the provision of health care.

For the purposes of the section “Health Care” is defined as the prevention, diagnosis, alleviation or treatment of an ailment, injury, infirmity, defect or disability but excluding routine ophthalmic treatment, routine dental treatment and unnecessary cosmetic surgery.

“Health Expenses” includes, inter alia, the costs of the services of a practitioner registered under the Dentists Act 1985

Therefore, an individual can claim tax relief in respect of non-routine dental care provided by a registered practitioner.

Non-routine dental treatment is not defined in legislation, but I have been advised by Revenue that a non-exhaustive list of relevant procedures is available on the Revenue website at: http://www.revenue.ie/en/personal-tax-credits-reliefs-and-exemptions/health-and-age/health-expenses/dental-expenses.aspx.

With regard to the Deputy’s specific question it is necessary to determine the purpose of the procedure to ascertain if tax relief is available. Expenses incurred in implant procedures of a purely cosmetic nature are not eligible for tax relief but where the procedure is necessary to ameliorate a physical deformity arising from, or directly related to, a congenital abnormality, a personal injury or a disease, including, for example, periodontal disease, the expenses will be eligible.

In the case of a PAYE taxpayer, the quickest and easiest way to claim for tax relief is online using PAYE Services in myAccount. In the case of a self-assessed taxpayer, relief is claimed by completing the relevant health expenses section of the Form 11 annual tax return.

Although not required to be submitted to Revenue when making a claim, an individual must hold a Form Med 2, signed and certified by the dental practitioner in support of any claim for non-routine dental care.

Stability and Growth Pact

Questions (120)

Michael McGrath

Question:

120. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance when the State is required to achieve its medium-term budgetary objective of a structural deficit of not greater than 0.5% under the domestic and EU fiscal rules; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41786/17]

View answer

Written answers

The preventive arm of the Stability and Growth Pact (the Pact) does not provide for a specific timeline for when a Member State should achieve its medium term budgetary objective, MTO. The Pact simply provides for an annual improvement in the structural deficit until the MTO is achieved, with this annual improvement governed by the position in the economic cycle and the level of public indebtedness of the Member State concerned.

Since the correction of the excessive deficit in 2015, it has been Government policy to achieve the MTO by 2018. Moreover, the Commission has identified Ireland as being at risk of deviation from the adjustment path toward to MTO in 2016-17. Hence, it is imperative to achieve the MTO in 2018 in order to avoid reputational damage, which inter alia could potentially impact upon our borrowing costs.

Finally, I want to point out that in its Annual Debt Report 2017, published in June, my Department highlighted that public debt per capita in Ireland is one of the highest in the developed world. It is absolutely imperative, in these circumstances, that the MTO is achieved as soon as possible so that we can begin reducing the burden of public debt.

Departmental Expenditure

Questions (121)

James Browne

Question:

121. Deputy James Browne asked the Minister for Finance the estimated cost of the provision of a defibrillator in each public building owned by his Department and agency under the aegis of his Department; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41927/17]

View answer

Written answers

In response to the Deputy’s question, in 2008 some nine defibrillators were purchased by my Department to assist in the event that a staff member or any person suffered a heart attack while on the premises. The unit cost of each defibrillator purchased was €1,580 exclusive of VAT.

In relation to bodies under the aegis of my Department, of which there are 18, it was not possible to provide the information sought in the time available in respect of each of these bodies, and therefore I will make arrangements to provide the information in line with Standing Orders.

Top
Share