Managing expenditure within their voted allocations is a key responsibility of each Minister and their Departments. At the end of October overall gross voted expenditure of €46 billion was 0.8% below profile. However, given the cash basis of Government accounting and the scale of gross voted expenditure, over €58 billion in aggregate for 2017, Supplementary Estimates play an important role in achieving proper alignment of funding allocations with planned expenditure. The need for Supplementary Estimates can arise from policy decisions, overruns, timing issues or shifts in expenditure requirements. Additional expenditure requirements in one Department may be offset by underspends in other areas.
The procedures in relation to Supplementary Estimates, both substantive and technical, are set out in Public Financial Procedures. As there is no facility provided under Public Financial Procedures for negative Supplementary Estimates, offsetting voted expenditure underspends in Votes not requiring Supplementary Estimates are not reflected in the aggregate amount below.
The aggregate amount in respect of Supplementary Estimates is €0.49 billion. The amounts by Vote are set out in the table.
Supplementary Estimates proposed for 2017
Substantive Supplementary Estimates
Vote
|
Amount
(€m)
|
Vote 5 – Director of Public Prosecutions
|
0.4
|
Vote 12 – Superannuation and Retired Allowances
|
6.5
|
Vote 17 – Public Appointments Service
|
0.7
|
Vote 20 – An Garda Síochána
|
44.2
|
Vote 26 – Education and Skills
|
124
|
Vote 34 – Housing, Planning and Local Government
|
100
|
Vote 35 – Army Pensions
|
10.7
|
Vote 37 – Employment Affairs and Social Protection
|
10
|
Vote 38 – Health
|
195
|
Technical Supplementary Estimates
Vote
|
Amount
(€m)
|
Vote 30 – Agriculture, Food and the Marine
|
0.001
|
Vote 31 – Transport, Tourism and Sport
|
0.001
|
Vote 32 – Business, Enterprise and Innovation
|
0.001
|
As we are operating under the fiscal rules that apply under the preventative arm of the Stability and Growth Pact, Supplementary Estimates can only be provided where they can be accommodated within the requirements of the fiscal rules, in terms of the projected structural budget balance and the application of the Expenditure Benchmark.
Looking at compliance with the Expenditure Benchmark, when compared to the projections set out on Budget day in October this year, the Supplementary Estimates that have been proposed this year would have an estimated impact of c. 0.1% of GDP on compliance with this fiscal rule. However, this does not take account of offsetting underspends to be surrendered at year-end that would mitigate this impact. Given the aggregate underspends at the end of October and November this year, and the amounts surrendered to the Exchequer last year, it would be expected that such underspends would reduce this potential impact.