Skip to main content
Normal View

Tuesday, 9 Jun 2020

Written Answers Nos. 241-260

Immigration Data

Questions (241)

Éamon Ó Cuív

Question:

241. Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív asked the Minister for Justice and Equality the number of applications by asylum seekers given a final decision on their cases in each year since 2010; the number of these applications that resulted in refugee status being granted; the number of cases that resulted in subsidiary protection being granted; the number that resulted in humanitarian leave to remain being granted; the number refused; the number of persons deported; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [10224/20]

View answer

Written answers

Since the commencement of the International Protection Act 2015 on 31 December 2016, a single application procedure applies where all aspects of a person's application (refugee status, subsidiary protection status and permission to remain) are examined and determined in one process. Prior to this, the three strands were examined sequentially and this could lead to long delays in obtaining a final decision.

Upon the commencement of the 2015 Act, approximately 3,500 legacy cases were carried over to be dealt with under the new single application procedure (1,500 of these cases were from the former Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner and 2,000 from the former Refugee Appeals Tribunal). A further 500 cases transitioned in the months following commencement. These cases would have been the longest in the system at the commencement of the Act.

The International Protection Office (IPO) committed to scheduling these legacy cases for interview by the end of 2018 and for completion by the end of Q2 2019, where possible.

The IPO achieved the first part of this commitment in 2018 by scheduling all transition cases for interview, where it was possible to do so. The vast majority of the legacy cases have now been processed to completion in the IPO, and the focus is now on post commencement single procedure cases.

Some legacy cases will continue to be dealt with. These include transition applicants who had not co-operated up to this point but who are now re-engaging with the process and applicants who have come back into the process through Judicial Review. These cases are prioritised and scheduled for interview at the earliest possible opportunity and are processed accordingly.

I append a number of tables providing the details requested by the Deputy on the number of applications by asylum seekers or International Protection applicants, as they are now known, who received a final decision on their cases by the Ministerial Decisions Unit in each year since 2010 .

Year of Decision

Total Decisions

2010

3,705*

2011

1,815*

2012

1,021*

2013

965*

2014

2,032

2015

2,804

2016

2,766

2017

1,191

2018

1,603

2019

2,872

2020

693

Grand Total

21,467

* These figures were collated from the Department's AISIP database. However, Subsidiary Protection figures for 2010 to 2013 were not included on that database and were therefore compiled under a different process for which an annual breakdown is not available. Therefore a further 92 cases granted Subsidiary Protection between 2010 and 2013 must be added to the grand total for the period from 2010 to date, giving an overall total of 21,559.

The following table sets out the number of these applications that resulted in refugee status (RS) being granted, the number of cases that resulted in subsidiary protection (SP) being granted and the number that resulted in humanitarian leave to remain (PTR) being granted.

Grants by year and grant type

Type of grant

Year Decision

RS Grant

SP Grant

PTR Review Grant

Grand Total

2010

159

#

159

2011

132

#

132

2012

93

#

93

2013

195

#

195

2014

212

270

482

2015

325

231

556

2016

590

137

727

2017

685

106

791

2018

828

224

29

1081

2019

947

168

169

1284

2020

257

68

48

373

Grand Total

4,423

1,204#

246

5,873#

# As noted above, 92 Subsidiary Protection permissions were granted in the period between 2010 and 2013 which were recorded on Repatriation systems rather than on the AISIP database. An annual breakdown of the total for those years is not available. However, including those grants, the total number of Subsidiary Protection grants for the period from 2010 to date would come to 1,296 and the overall total for the period would come to 5,965.

The table below sets out the various categories of refusal, including those deemed refused due to withdrawal by the applicants or deemed withdrawn due to lack of response from the applicant.

Refusal by year and refusal type

Type of Refusal

YearDecision

PTR Review Refusal

Refuse All

RS Deemed Withdrawn

RS Refusal

RS Refused-Withdrawn

SP Deemed Withdrawn

SP Refusal

SP Refused-Withdrawn

Grand Total

2010

3,546

728

4,274

2011

1,683

1,161

2,844

2012

926

2

681

1,609

2013

768

2

40

810

2014

7

431

71

447

104

490

1,550

2015

8

610

266

481

571

312

2,248

2016

21

941

347

229

454

47

2,039

2017

7

61

6

323

3

400

2018

299

116

52

55

522

2019

533

924

59

71

1

1,588

2020

178

126

6

10

320

Grand total

1,010

1,173

36

9,083

688

1,163

4,198

853

18,204

* Refuse All figures are applications under the IP Act 2015 (single procedure) that were not appealed to the IPAT and a decision issued from the Ministerial Decisions Unit. The decision is a refusal by the Ministerial Decisions unit of both Refugee Status (RS) and Subsidiary Protection (SP) only.

*PTR Review Refusal are applications that were refused Refugee Status (RS) and Subsidiary Protection (SP) and post appeal to the IPAT were also refused Permission to Remain(PTR) by the Ministerial Decisions Unit.

*SP Refusals and RS Refusals are refusals that were not made under the single procedure but were either legacy cases under the Refugee Act 1996 or cases processed under the transitional provisions of the IP Act 2015.

The table below sets out the number of Deportations*

Year Deported

Total Deported

2010

343

2011

280

2012

302

2013

209

2014

114

2015

251

2016

428

2017

140

2018

163

2019

298

2020 (up to 04.06.2020)

87

Total

2615

*The figures above are for effected deportations, i.e,. it includes those deported and those deemed to be deported, who left the state themselves having received a deportation order.

Since the International Protection Act 2015 (the 2015 Act) commenced on 31 December 2016, the International Protection Office has carried out the function of considering Permission to Remain (under section 49 of the 2015 Act).

Permission to Remain decisions

Year

Grant

Refusal

2020 (to end April)

42

618

2019

266

2,083

2018

198

1,833

2017

66

618

Garda Resources

Questions (242)

Thomas Pringle

Question:

242. Deputy Thomas Pringle asked the Minister for Justice and Equality the number of evidential intoxilyzer machines in each Garda division as of 1 June 2020, in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [10233/20]

View answer

Written answers

The Deputy will appreciate that under the Garda Síochána Act 2005, the Garda Commissioner is responsible for the administration and business of An Garda Síochána as well as the efficient use of resources. This includes responsibility for decisions on the allocation of Garda resources across the Divisions, in light of identified operational demands. As Minister, I have no role in those matters.

I am advised by the Garda authorities that there are 86 Evidential Intoxilyzer Machines currently in use by An Garda Síochána. The following table, furnished to me by the Garda authorities, details the number of Intoxilyzer Machines currently in use in each of the Garda Divisions.

Division

Evidential Intoxilyzer Machines

Cavan/Monaghan

5

Clare

4

Cork City

2

Cork North

5

Cork West

3

D.M.R. Eastern

1

D.M.R. North Central

1

D.M.R. Northern

2

D.M.R. South Central

1

D.M.R. Southern

1

D.M.R. Western

3

Donegal

5

Galway

5

Kerry

4

Kildare

4

Kilkenny/Carlow

2

Laois/Offaly

3

Limerick

3

Louth

2

Mayo

3

Meath

4

Roscommon/Longford

2

Sligo/Leitrim

3

Tipperary

6

Waterford

2

Westmeath

2

Wexford

4

Wicklow

4

Garda Equipment

Questions (243)

Thomas Pringle

Question:

243. Deputy Thomas Pringle asked the Minister for Justice and Equality if funding has been secured to update the batons available to gardaí; when batons were last updated; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [10234/20]

View answer

Written answers

In accordance the Garda Síochána Act 2005, the Garda Commissioner is responsible for managing and controlling the administration and business of An Garda Síochána. The allocation of Garda resources, including equipment and specialist equipment, is also a matter for the Commissioner, in light of identified operational demands. Other than in the case of certain less-lethal weapons, as Minister I have no role in these matters.

I am informed by the Garda authorities the current ASP baton utilised by An Garda Síochána was introduced in 2007.

I am further informed that there are currently no plans to introduce a new baton and that as a result, no extra funding has been sought in that regard.

More generally, the Deputy may be interested to know that the resources provided to An Garda Síochána have reached record levels, with an unprecedented allocation of €1.88 billion for 2020. A substantial programme of capital investment is also being undertaken in An Garda Síochána, including an investment of €342 million in the Garda ICT infrastructure between 2016 and 2021, an investment of €46 million in the Garda fleet for the period 2016-2021 and a very significant investment in the Garda estate over the same period. Decisions on the best use of these resources are operational matters for the Commissioner.

Garda Operations

Questions (244)

Thomas Pringle

Question:

244. Deputy Thomas Pringle asked the Minister for Justice and Equality when the Donegal Garda divisional protective services unit will be established; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [10235/20]

View answer

Written answers

The Garda Commissioner is by law responsible for management of An Garda Síochána and for the allocation and efficient use of Garda resources. This includes responsibility for the distribution of personnel across the various Garda Divisions. As Minister I have no direct role in these matters. I understand, however, that Garda management keeps the distribution of resources under continual review in the context of crime trends and policing priorities, to ensure their optimum use.

I have been informed by the Commissioner that 16 Divisional Protective Services Units (DPSUs) are now operational across 15 Divisions.

I am assured that An Garda Síochána continues to implement the roll-out of DPSUs nationwide and aims to ensure that a DPSU will be in operation within every Garda Síochána division as soon as possible. Roll-out of these Units will meet a key commitment in A Policing Service for the Future , the four-year implementation plan giving effect to the recommendations of the Commission on the Future of Policing in Ireland.

I am informed by An Garda Síochána that a competition for staffing of a DPSU in the Donegal Division was launched but that in light of the Covid-19 pandemic and associated public health restrictions, interviews for the positions have been postponed. I understand that that that these will be arranged to take place as soon as circumstances allow. I am further informed that a Sexual Assault Investigation Unit is currently operating in the Donegal Division, pending the establishment of a DPSU, and that procedures are in place to ensure all alleged sexual crimes reported to Gardaí in the Division are appropriately investigated.

Garda Operations

Questions (245)

Thomas Pringle

Question:

245. Deputy Thomas Pringle asked the Minister for Justice and Equality when each remaining divisional protective services unit will be established; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [10236/20]

View answer

Written answers

The Garda Commissioner is by law responsible for management of An Garda Síochána and for the allocation and efficient use of Garda resources. This includes responsibility for the distribution of personnel across the various Garda Divisions. As Minister I have no direct role in these matters. I understand, however, that Garda management keeps the distribution of resources under continual review in the context of crime trends and policing priorities, to ensure their optimum use.

I have been informed by the Commissioner that 16 Divisional Protective Services Units (DPSUs) are now operational across 15 Divisions.

I am assured that An Garda Síochána remains committed to implementing the roll-out of DPSUs nationwide and aims to ensure that a DPSU will be in operation within every Garda Division as soon as possible. Roll-out of these Units will meet a key commitment in A Policing Service for the Future , the four-year implementation plan giving effect to the recommendations of the Commission on the Future of Policing in Ireland.

As the Deputy will appreciate, the Covid-19 pandemic has had an impact on the pace of progress and Gardaí inform me that in light of the pandemic, it is difficult to provide specific dates for establishment of the DPSUs in each of the remaining Garda Divisions. I am informed however that competition stage to permit for the staffing and establishment of DPSUs in these 13 Divisions has been reached and that Garda management will seek to conclude this process as soon as possible.

The Deputy will appreciate that existing arrangements for the investigation of sexual crimes continue in place, pending establishment of the DPSUs in the remaining Divisions.

Alcohol Sales

Questions (246)

Thomas Pringle

Question:

246. Deputy Thomas Pringle asked the Minister for Justice and Equality the number of alcohol test purchases that were carried out within the Donegal Garda division; the number of premises that were found in breach of licensing laws; the frequency with which alcohol test purchases were carried out in each of the years 2018, 2019 and to date in 2020, in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [10237/20]

View answer

Written answers

The Garda Commissioner is by law responsible for the direction and control of An Garda Síochána as well as for operational matters such as that referred to. As Minister, I have no direct role in that matter.

As the Deputy will appreciate, under the Intoxicating Liquor Act 1988, the holder of a licence shall not sell or deliver, or permit any person to sell or deliver, intoxicating liquor to persons under 18 years of age.

Test purchasing is governed by section 37C of the Intoxicating Liquor Act 1988, which came into operation in October 2010. It involves a person who is at least 15 but under the age of 18 years, acting on the instruction of a member of the Garda Síochána, entering into a licensed premises for the purpose of purchasing alcohol. The objective of test purchasing is to identify if a licensee is complying with statutory provisions regarding the sale of alcohol to underage persons and, if not, to obtain evidence for possible legal proceedings. The Act sets out the basis on which licensed premises will be selected for test purchasing and contains a number of safeguards for the test purchaser including a requirement for parental consent or consent of his/her guardian.

I am informed by Garda management that test purchasing of intoxicating liquor is intended to form only one part of the overall Garda Síochána programme for enforcing licensing law provisions relating to persons under the age of 18 years of age. I am further informed by Garda management that decisions concerning specific enforcement policies and actions will necessarily reflect local needs and priorities.

I am advised by the Garda authorities that a search of Pulse was carried out and that no such text purchased are recorded as having been conducted in Donegal in the period referred to by the Deputy. The following table, furnished to me by the Garda authorities, sets out the number of test purchases recorded as having been carried out on a national level during the same period.

Test Purchasing of intoxicating Liquor nationally

National Data

2018

2019

2020 (to date)

Total

Total

295

164

84

543

Question No. 247 answered with Question No. 223.

Direct Provision System

Questions (248)

Róisín Shortall

Question:

248. Deputy Róisín Shortall asked the Minister for Justice and Equality if he will address concerns raised by residents of a direct provision centre (details supplied); if urgent action will be taken to protect residents; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [10273/20]

View answer

Written answers

A number of measures were introduced in the Skellig Accommodation Centre in Cahersiveen in recent weeks to make life more comfortable for the residents and in particular the children who are living there.

Families with children were provided with arts and crafts materials, toys, books and tablets, to use as they wished. This was coordinated by the local Family Resource Centre with the cost of the tablets specifically covered by Tusla. Additionally, I am advised that the service provider at the centre has provided 12 laptops for residents’ use, including the children of school going age.

I can also inform the Deputy that all international protection accommodation centres are contractually obliged to have Wi-Fi available to residents and TVs are provided in all bedrooms to enable children to access web-based educational resources and educational programmes such as the RTE Home School Hub, which is an additional support for parents and primary school pupils.

With regard to issues related to warm weather, I am advised that during the recent period of exceptionally warm weather, it took some time to adjust the central heating system but that this issue is now resolved. Centre management has advised that during the Summer months it would not be unusual for some flies to come through any open window but there is no question of an infestation of insects on the premises.

I hope this information provides the Deputy with some reassurance on the issues raised. My Department officials and I will continue to work closely with centre management to ensure the comfort and safety of all residents in the centre.

Road Traffic Offences

Questions (249)

Seán Crowe

Question:

249. Deputy Seán Crowe asked the Minister for Justice and Equality if his attention has been drawn to the problem in many communities in which it is unwise and not safe to walk due to the use of scramblers, mopeds and quads in parks and greens; if his attention has further been drawn to the different approaches to this problem in different Garda divisions; and if there is a code or best practice being used in different areas. [10301/20]

View answer

Written answers

My Department, alongside colleagues in the Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport and An Garda Síochána, is acutely aware of the severe difficulties and dangers this activity caused in the communities it impacts and my officials have been working to find solutions to this complex policing issue. It should be noted that targeted enforcement measures have been introduced in a number of areas where quad bikes and scramblers were causing difficulties. For example, Gardaí in areas like Finglas have had recent success in reducing the number of issues with scramblers through targeted enforcement, while youth community engagement groups in Limerick have had successes diverting young people away from using these vehicles in a dangerous manner in public places, and towards properly organised motorcross events.

As I have outlined in previous Parliamentary responses, a cross-agency group has been examining the misuse of scramblers. This process has involved my Department, the Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport, Housing, Planning and Local Government and Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, as well as An Garda Síochána, the Road Safety Authority, the Revenue Commissioners and representatives of local authorities.

On foot of advice from the Office of the Attorney General, it was agreed that, in the main, current legislative provisions appeared to be sufficient. Nonetheless it was also agreed that the group would remain open to considering workable legislative solutions to any specific legislative gaps specifically identified by An Garda Síochána.

My officials wrote to the Garda Commissioner to seek his formal views on the matter. The response from the Office of the Garda Commissioner does suggest potential legislative changes which the organisation believes could assist in improving policing in this area.

The cross-agency group most recently met in December 2019. The group agreed that the Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport – which has primary responsibility for road traffic legislation – would explore the feasibility of developing new legislative provisions in road traffic legislation, which would seek to deliver the benefits sought by An Garda Síochána without unintended consequences for existing law.

Addressing the misuse of scramblers is a complex matter requiring a considered and multi-faceted approach directed at those in individual communities whose actions and behaviour impact negatively on those around them. At the December meeting, An Garda Síochána agreed to explore further targeted enforcement measures; while also advising that they would have a visible presence in affected communities over the Christmas period – which traditionally comes with an increase in this form of behaviour.

It was also agreed that my Department would consider and develop actions in order to increase awareness of the dangers of these vehicles jointly with affected communities, community groups and other stakeholders, and explore how best to engage with young persons who are drawn to this behaviour. My Department is examining options in this area, with due regard to social distancing requirements.

More broadly, the Deputy may also wish to be aware that the draft Youth Justice Strategy 2020-2026 has recently been published for public consultation by my colleague, the Minister for State David Stanton. An online questionnaire is available until the end of June to allow members of the public, including of course young people, to express their views. Further information is available on my Department's website at the following link: http://www.justice.ie/en/JELR/Pages/Youth_Justice_Strategy_Public_Consultation

Direct Provision System

Questions (250)

Gary Gannon

Question:

250. Deputy Gary Gannon asked the Minister for Justice and Equality the way in which persons in direct provision are being supported in terms of being able to social distance, PPE provision and online tools and internet that is vital at this time for education, well-being and communication. [10361/20]

View answer

Written answers

I can assure the Deputy that my Department, the HSE and centre management are doing everything that we can to protect the health and welfare of our residents and centre staff as well as that of the wider community at this time. We have been assured by both the HSE and the Office of the Chief Medical Officer that our approach is appropriate.

All accommodation centres are carefully following the guidelines for our centres that have been published by the HSE’s Health Protection Surveillance Centre, which can be found on its website www.hpsc.ie. That guidance exists precisely because it is recognised that congregated settings such as Direct Provision centres present specific challenges in this pandemic.

Shared bedrooms and communal living space are provided in numerous settings. Similar arrangements apply in homeless and disability services and, indeed, in private rented accommodation. The direction from the HSE is that during the COVID crisis non-family members sharing a room in Direct Provision centres are considered to be a household. As such, they should implement social distancing measures from other households, i.e. residents in other rooms, and self-isolate if displaying symptoms or if directed by the HSE. In such instances, we provide facilities for self-isolation both on and off-site.

The established procedure across all centres where a person is suspected of having the virus or is confirmed as having the virus, is that, where advised by Public Health, they are moved to a dedicated offsite self-isolation facility. Supports are available for the duration of their period of isolation until such time as the HSE considers that they can safely return to their centre. My Department has opened four dedicated self-isolation facilities for residents in Dublin, Cork and Limerick, and Dundalk, with a total capacity of 299 rooms. Residents in these facilities have their own bedroom and their own bathroom.

Since the start of the year over 1,550 permanent and temporary Direct Provision bed spaces have been procured, including the dedicated new centres opened in Rosslare Harbour, Cahersiveen and Tullamore.

We have relocated over 600 residents to support social and physical distancing in centres and cocooning measures for the most vulnerable. By doing this, we have ensured that no more than three single people are sharing a room in any of our centres. We intend to continue this policy when the crisis is over.

We have cocooned all residents aged 65 or older and those advised to my Department by the HSE as requiring cocooning on medical grounds.

We are communicating directly with centre managers and residents via regular newsletters, which can also be found on our website www.accommodationcentres.ie. The newsletters have provided practical information on implementing social and physical distancing at this time and promoted shared learning and best practice across our network of centres. Residents have also been made aware of the need for good hand hygiene and coughing/sneezing etiquette. Information and posters have been distributed to all centres and translations of public health information have also been provided.

During this time, centre managers have also been advised to increase the standard and frequency of cleaning throughout the centres, paying particular attention to communal areas. A regular supply of hand sanitiser for centres is in place and this is distributed to centres as required. Other PPE is distributed, as needed, and in line with the HPSC guidelines for its appropriate use in residential settings.

Regarding internet access, I can inform the Deputy that all accommodation centres in my Department are contractually obliged to have Wi-Fi available to residents. My officials have been undertaking a review of access across all centres in recent weeks in order to ensure that signal strength is adequate. Televisions are also provided in all bedrooms. This enables children to access educational programmes such as the RTE Home School Hub, which is an additional support for parents and primary school pupils. Pupils are able to watch, download and engage with curriculum-based content, project work, and fun activities to keep them entertained and learning. This broadcast is a supplement to the ongoing learning being provided by teachers.

Children who reside in Direct Provision accommodation centres are in the care of their parents and guardians. Similar to all other parents, they are responsible for ensuring that their children are engaging with education at this current time. The Department of Education and Skills (DES) and TUSLA Education Support Service (TESS) are supporting the schools and parents at this time. The International Protection Accommodation Service (IPAS ) of my Department is liaising with these services to ensure that the most vulnerable children are identified and supported. A communication pathway for schools, parents and centre managers in relation to education issues has been put in place. TESS Education Welfare Officers (EWOs) will identify children and families who may need assistance, liaising with schools and sourcing additional services/resources where necessary. Children and their parents or guardians living in accommodation centres are also supported by a Tusla official and a Department of Education official seconded to my Department to work with IPAS. This ensures that any education or child support issues can be quickly followed up.

My Department has developed a Strategic Framework for Engagement on Child and Family Issues in the context of school closures and social distancing requirements put in place during the COVID-19 crisis. The International Protection Accommodation Service (IPAS) and Child and Family Welfare Team has developed this framework to support families living in our centres. In preparing the framework, outreach has taken place with key stakeholders including centre managers, TUSLA, the Department of Children and Youth Affairs, the Department of Education and Skills, the Department of Rural and Community Development, the HSE, the Children’s Rights Alliance, One Family and UNHCR. We will continue to work closely with these and other partners. The Framework encompasses three broad themes under which actions will be rolled out: child and family welfare, identifying education requirements, and the general provision of activities for children.

I understand that existing supports for groups under-represented in higher level education and at risk groups in further education and training, will be maintained and re-oriented as part of the response to COVID-19 by the Department of Education and Skills. These groups include learners in Direct Provision settings. A working-group on mitigating educational disadvantage is consulting with stakeholders in the further and higher education sectors on how best to ensure continuity of learning for individuals most at risk of being impacted by the pandemic.

I hope this information provides the Deputy with some reassurance of the steps we are taking at this time to protect the health, safety and wellbeing of all residents and centre staff as a priority.

Prison Staff

Questions (251)

Cian O'Callaghan

Question:

251. Deputy Cian O'Callaghan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality if he has considered introducing flexibility in the retirement age for prison officers with the capacity and the willingness to continue working; the way in which prison officer retirement rules compare with those in Northern Ireland and elsewhere; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [10377/20]

View answer

Written answers

The Deputy will appreciate that it is the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform, rather than my Department, which has overall responsibility for public service pension matters.

With regard to the particular question posed, I can inform the Deputy that the retiring age of 60 years for prison officers to whom the Superannuation (Prison Officers) Act, 1919 applies is set out at section 8(1)(a) of the Civil Service Regulation Act, 1956 (as amended).

As noted in a recent response on this topic, a review of the compulsory retirement age was carried out by the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform in 2017. I do not have any immediate plans to change this but the matter is kept under review in consultation with the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform.

Citizenship Applications

Questions (252)

Cian O'Callaghan

Question:

252. Deputy Cian O'Callaghan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality the average waiting time for the processing of citizenship applications in each of the years 2016 to 2019 and to date in 2020; the number of persons that were waiting more than six months for an application to be processed at the end of each of the years 2016 to 2019; the number of persons that were waiting to have their applications processed at the end of each of the years 2016 to 2019 and the end of May 2020, in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [10380/20]

View answer

Written answers

The granting of Irish citizenship through naturalisation under the provisions of the Irish Nationality and Citizenship Act 1956, as amended, is a privilege and an honour which confers certain rights and entitlements, not only within the State but also at European Union as well as international level. It is therefore important that appropriate procedures are in place to ensure that the integrity of the regime for granting Irish citizenship through the naturalisation process is held in high regard both at home and internationally. These procedures are continually evolving arising from, for example, service improvements due to the introduction of new technology and updated work practices.

In general (and absent exceptional delaying events referred to below), it takes around 6 months for a standard application to be processed from the date it is received to the date a decision is made. However, the nature of the naturalisation process is such that, for a broad range of reasons, some cases can take longer than others to process. Additional security checks can result in some applications taking longer than this average timescale. Such checks are fundamental to maintaining the legitimacy of the naturalisation process both nationally and internationally.

In addition, processing timescales can be impacted due to incomplete applications having to be returned, further documentation being required from the applicant, or where payment of the required certificate fee is awaited, or the applicant has not been engaging with the Immigration Service of my Department. Sometimes the input of several government agencies, both within and outside this jurisdiction is needed and the request and receipt of information from these sources can result in delays in processing some applications. In other instances, issues can arise at the final stage of the naturalisation process, for example, where additional information comes to light which is required to be considered before a final decision is taken.

It should be noted that once an applicant has been approved, there are a number of further steps which must be completed before they can be scheduled for attendance at a citizenship ceremony, which can result in an additional delay.

Processing Times: Months from Date application received to Date of Decision 2016 - 2019

Year

Number of applications Decided

Average Processing Time - all decisions (Months)

Median Processing Time To Approval (Months)*

Median Processing Time to Refusal (Months)

2016

11,081

6

3

27

2017

9,190

7

6

23

2018

11,139

11

7

23

2019

9,319

12

10

19

2020

3,551

13

11

19

* Median processing time in 2016 is skewed by a large number of minor applications being decided.

The number of persons waiting more than six months for an application to be processed at the end of each of the years 2016 to 2019 was as set out in the following table.

Applications Decided by number of months from application to decision 2016 - 2019

Year

Less than 6 months

6 to less than 12 months

12 to less than 18 months

18 to less than 24 months

24 months+

Total

2016

8565

1289

275

259

684

11072

2017

3874

4033

469

245

527

9148

2018

3394

3740

2101

841

983

11059

2019

779

4142

2305

940

468

8634

2020

228

1556

916

266

290

3256

% breakdown

Year

Less than 6 months

6 to less than 12 months

12 to less than 18 months

18 to less than 24 months

24 months+

2016

77%

12%

2%

2%

6%

2017

42%

44%

5%

3%

6%

2018

31%

34%

19%

8%

9%

2019

9%

48%

27%

11%

5%

2020

7%

48%

28%

8%

9%

The number of persons waiting to have their applications processed at the end of each of the years 2016 to 2019 and the end of May 2020 are presented in the following table.

Applications open at Year end 2016 - 2019

Year End

Standard Adult

Spouse of Irish Citizen (S15a)

Refugee

Minor*

Total

2016

5,995

1,402

258

667

8,322

2017

7,483

2,044

439

1,030

10,996

2018

8,233

2,605

634

1,350

12,822

2019

12,703

3,959

1,116

2,167

19,945

2020 (Q1)

11,415

3,622

1,210

2,249

18,496

Minor includes applications under S28a of the Act.

As well as demands caused by increased checks and a larger number of applications, the process for citizenship has had a number of specific challenges in the last year which have led to delays. Firstly, on foot of a challenge taken in the High Court last year by an applicant who was refused a certificate of naturalisation due to their absences from the State during the last year prior to the date of their application, significant delays were caused to processing, as the naturalisation consideration had to be suspended pending the outcome of an appeal.

While it was subsequently possible to organise a naturalisation ceremony for thousands of applicants, the restrictions attendant to the current COVID-19 pandemic have regrettably resulted in significant challenges to the delivery of normal services. As a result of these restrictions, the Citizenship Division of the Immigration Service, along with many other public and private sector organisations is experiencing significant disruption in delivering its core functions. Working within these restrictions, public safety and the wellbeing of staff are of course both urgent priorities. As the Deputy may be aware, the next scheduled citizenship ceremony due to take place in the INEC in Killarney in July 2020 has unfortunately been postponed due to the current restrictions. I have instructed my officials to examine feasible mechanisms and processes whereby procedures such as citizenship ceremonies can take place while fully complying with the criteria outlined in the Government Roadmap for Reopening Society and Business. As the Deputy will appreciate, the number of applications on hand at a given point in time is impacted by ceremony schedules.

Personal Insolvency Arrangements

Questions (253)

Cian O'Callaghan

Question:

253. Deputy Cian O'Callaghan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality further to Parliamentary Question No. 364 of 27 May 2020, the provisions which will be contained in the short urgent Bill referenced; the changes to the Personal Insolvency Acts necessitated by Covid-19; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [10385/20]

View answer

Written answers

In my reply to Parliamentary Question No. 364 of 27 May, I indicated that my officials are considering certain specific formal or procedural statutory requirements which may be difficult or impracticable to comply with, due to COVID-19 restrictions, including a small number of requirements under the Personal Insolvency Acts, so that any necessary amendments could be addressed in an urgent forthcoming bill.

It is not possible at this stage to provide further details on the exact changes to be included in the forthcoming COVID-related bill, as these have not been finalised at this point in time.

Question No. 254 answered with Question No. 223.

Departmental Funding

Questions (255)

Roderic O'Gorman

Question:

255. Deputy Roderic O'Gorman asked the Minister for Justice and Equality the details of funding for an organisation (details supplied) in each of the years 2008 to 2020; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [10406/20]

View answer

Written answers

The National Collective of Community based Women's Networks (NCCWN) consists of 17 women's groups located in various parts of the country, and is involved broadly in activation and outreach for disadvantaged women. The Department of Justice and Equality has funded the NCCWN since 2016. Prior to this, funding was provided by the Department of the Environment. Since 2016, my Department has provided funding of over €6,362,028 to the NCCWN.

This funding is towards salaries, administration and overhead costs incurred in the implementation of the activities set out in the agreed Women's Equality and Development Programme, NCCWN Support Scheme to Enhance the Inclusion of Women in Communities 2019, in line with the objectives contained in the National Strategy for Women and Girls 2017-2020.

The summary of payments from the Department of Justice and Equality to NCCWN to date from 2016 to 2020 totalling €6,362,028.22 breaks down as:

2016 €1,385,000.01

2017 €1,502,083.34

2018 €1,410,642.36

2019 €1,438,969.51

2020 to date €625,333.00

NCCWN have also received payments under the ESF PEIL 2.9 2019 call of €318,231.96 and ESF PEIL 2.9 2016 call of €250,000.

Direct Provision System

Questions (256, 257)

Violet-Anne Wynne

Question:

256. Deputy Violet-Anne Wynne asked the Minister for Justice and Equality if provisions will be made for residents in a direct provision centre (details supplied) in County Clare to access suitable snacks and hot and cold drinks outside of mealtimes between the hours of 6pm and 8am; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [10411/20]

View answer

Violet-Anne Wynne

Question:

257. Deputy Violet-Anne Wynne asked the Minister for Justice and Equality the provisions in place for residents in a direct provision centre (details supplied) in County Clare in relation to personal sanitation products; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [10412/20]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 256 and 257 together.

I have made inquiries and I have been informed of the following in relation to the Centre referred to. Hand sanitiser was issued to each individual resident at the commencement of the COVID-19 crisis. It is replenished from reception as and when required. Hand sanitisation stations are located outside bedrooms and also at the entrances to each accommodation block. Stations are also located in several locations throughout the administration building including the restaurant and communal areas.

Cleaning packs containing disinfectant spray, tissues, brushes and mops have also been distributed to each bedroom.

With regard to personal hygiene products, sanitary towels and tampons are issued to residents as part of their toiletries packs and are also available as and when required by residents. Packs also include toilet paper, shampoo, shower gel and toothpaste.

Residents who require nappies are issued with a weekly payment by the Community Welfare Officer for their purchase. In addition to this weekly payment, the Northside Family Resource Centre have visited the centre several times over the past number of weeks with additional supplies of nappies for all children.

The catering area for each block in the centre referred to is accessible 24 hours a day, where there is a Burco boiler available to residents to prepare refreshments. Snacks, including cereals and biscuits, are also made available for residents in the catering area.

Direct Provision System

Questions (258)

Richard Boyd Barrett

Question:

258. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Justice and Equality his plans to end the direct provision system here in view of the recent events in the United States of America and increased awareness of the dangers of racism and discrimination; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [10421/20]

View answer

Written answers

Last year Minister Flanagan and I asked Dr. Catherine Day to bring together an expert group with representation from asylum seekers and NGOs to examine best practice in other European States in the provision of services to international protection applicants, to examine likely longer term trends and to set out recommendations and solutions. The Group is examining both the reception system for accommodating applicants and the system for processing applications, and is expected to make recommendations for changes in both areas. A briefing paper on the work of the group, prepared by the Chairperson to inform programme for government talks, has been circulated to members of both Houses of the Oireachtas.

As the Deputy will be aware, the Briefing Note includes a list of measures, identified so far, which would immediately improve the situation of those currently in Direct Provision, and on which officials of the Department have been asked to prepare proposals for the incoming Government. The work of the group is advancing at pace and their report is expected by the end of September.

Minister Flanagan and I are happy that this Briefing Note signals far-reaching proposals and we were anxious to ensure that Dr. Day and her Group were free to make any recommendations they deemed appropriate based on an expert analysis.

Last year we also established a high level Interdepartmental Group chaired by a senior official of my Department, to ensure that all Departments are proactively delivering on their responsibilities. The Group is reviewing the management of services for applicants for international protection and considering the short-to-medium term options which could be implemented to improve the system. Its Report has been finalised and is ready to be submitted to a new Government.

The system of Direct Provision refers to the suite of State services and supports that are provided by a range of Government Departments and agencies to persons seeking international protection in the State. It includes provision of medical cards, an exemption from prescription charges, access to education for children, a weekly payment, access to Exceptional Needs Payments, when required, and, of course, ensuring that all basic needs are met, like accommodation and food.

It is important note that significant efforts have been made to reform the system in recent years. Mr. Justice Bryan McMahon, whose report in 2015 has been the basis for introducing improvements to the system, has himself noted that the system has improved considerably compared to what it was five years ago.

Significant improvements made to the system in recent years include access to the services of the Ombudsman and the Ombudsman for Children; agreed National Standards for accommodation providers; the introduction of labour market access; and the continued roll-out of self-catering facilities for residents (now available to more than half of all residents).

The new National Standards contain specific actions to improve the lives of children in accommodation centres. As well as the aforementioned access to the services of the Ombudsman for Children, they are also supported by the Child Protection Policies that we have put in place in the centres. In addition, there is a Tusla official seconded to my Department to work with our International Protection Accommodation Service (IPAS). This ensures that any child protection issues are swiftly followed up and that the process for referrals is as streamlined as possible.

Currently, around 25% of residents (1,974 people) in the Direct Provision system have own door self-catered accommodation. While, at this time, all available accommodation of this type is fully utilised, families are prioritised when this type of accommodation becomes available.

It is to be noted that the Joint Committee on Justice and Equality, in its report on Direct Provision and the International Protection Application Process, published last December, found that there was no clear consensus from the Committee as to what alternatives could or ought to replace the current system. Their Report also acknowledged that any new system of reception and accommodation will need time to ensure the right system is put in place.

Finally, Minister Flanagan and I look forward to the completion of the work of Dr. Day’s expert group and the implementation of major changes, should the incoming Government accept the proposals.

Personal Insolvency Arrangements

Questions (259)

Róisín Shortall

Question:

259. Deputy Róisín Shortall asked the Minister for Justice and Equality if he will provide statistical information in relation to section 115A of the Personal Insolvency Act 2012 (details supplied). [10432/20]

View answer

Written answers

The Insolvency Service of Ireland, (ISI) is an independent statutory body under my remit. I have had the necessary enquiries made and the Insolvency Service of Ireland has provided the information sought by the Deputy.

Numbers represent figures available up to 4 June 2020.

Statistical Information

Number of applications commenced under section 115A of the Personal Insolvency Act 2012 to date.

1909

Number of cases in which at least one notice of objection has been filed by at least one creditor.

1608

Number of first instance applications commenced under section 115A in which a final order has been made by the court.

1186

Number of first instance cases in which at least one notice of objection has been filed in cases in which the court has approved the application under section 115A.

264

Number of appeals that have been brought against a refusal of the Circuit Court to confirm a personal insolvency arrangement under section 115A to date.

404

Number of appeals that have been brought against a refusal of the Circuit Court to confirm a personal insolvency arrangement under section 115A in which the High Court has made a final order on the appeal.

313

Number of appeals brought against a refusal of the Circuit Court to confirm a personal insolvency arrangement under section 115A, in which an order has been made by the High Court confirming the coming into effect of a Personal Insolvency Arrangement.

85 (further 22 remitted back to court of first instance for final determination)

Immigration Status

Questions (260)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

260. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality the progress to date in the determination for residency and naturalisation in the case of a person (details supplied) who is awaiting a decision in this regard; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [10443/20]

View answer

Written answers

As the Deputy is aware, if an application for asylum or subsidiary protection has been made in the State, for confidentiality reasons it is not the practice to comment on such applications and the applicant or their legal representative should contact either the International Protection Office (IPO) or the International Protection Appeals Tribunal (IPAT) directly, as appropriate.

The IPO may be contacted either by email to info@ipo.gov.ie, by telephone to the IPO Customer Service Centre at 01 6028008 or in writing to Customer Service Centre, International Protection Office, 79-83 Lower Mount Street, Dublin 2. The International Protection Appeals Tribunal may be contacted either by email to info@protectionappeals.ie, by telephone at 01-4748400 (or Lo-Call 1890 201 458), or in writing to Corporate Services Division, The International Protection Appeals Tribunal, 6-7 Hanover Street East, Dublin D02 W320.

Following the commencement of the International Protection Act 2015 on 31 December 2016, new arrangements for the investigation and determination of applications for international protection (refugee status and subsidiary protection) and cases involving permission to remain in the State were introduced. Such applications are now processed, as part of a single application procedure, by the International Protection Office (IPO) which has replaced the Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner (ORAC) from that date. The staff of that Office (the Chief International Protection Officer and International Protection Officers) are independent in the performance of their protection functions.

For your information, on 27 February 2017, the Chief International Protection Officer, following consultation with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), published a statement on the Prioritisation of Applications under the International Protection Act 2015 which is available on the website of the International Protection Office (www.ipo.gov.ie).

Queries in relation to the status of individual immigration cases may be made directly to the Immigration Service of my Department by e-mail using the Oireachtas Mail facility which has been specifically established for this purpose. This service enables up-to-date information on such cases to be obtained without the need to seek information by way of the Parliamentary Questions process. The Deputy may consider using the e-mail service except in cases where the response from the Immigration Service is, in the Deputy’s view, inadequate or too long awaited.

Top
Share