Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 30 Jun 1960

Vol. 183 No. 6

Committee on Finance. - Adjournment Debate: Telephone Services in Dublin City and County.

I am raising this matter not for the purpose of embarrassing the Minister but to bring to his attention the difficulties subscribers encounter in their efforts to get service from their telephone exchanges. It seems that the volume of telephone traffic has grown to such a considerable extent that the equipment now available and which is being operated by a very efficient staff is not adequate to provide the necessary service. I refer particularly to the fact that thousands of subscribers every day, when they find it necessary to dial O for the purpose of getting through to the Central Telephone Exchange, for one reason or another have to wait quite a considerable time. Some subscribers have got to wait half an hour for an answer to dial O. It is quite a common thing apparently at the moment for these subscribers to be required to wait five, ten or 15 minutes for dial 0 to be answered.

This is a very sudden change. It did not happen six months or 12 months ago; it is only in recent months or weeks that this situation developed. There are possible reasons for it. One example would be that the telephone subscriber who has five lines or ten lines and who has been finding it difficult to get an answer on one line—he might hold on for five or ten minutes to get the answer on one line—decides to dial 0 on four or five of those lines. You then have four or five lines from the one subscriber dialling to the telephone exchange. You have this happening in several places where there is more than one telephone line.

In addition to that, you have the thousands of subscribers who have only the one telephone on which to dial O trying to contact the Central Telephone Exchange. I understand, of course, that there is an automatic system inside, which receives and holds all these calls in rotation, but let us take the case of a man with only one telephone dialling O. He is competing against a man who has three, four or ten lines dialling at the same time—two persons trying to get into the Central Telephone Exchange. Naturally, the man with several lines has the better chance. In any case, if he is getting on a queue inside on the telephone board he is certainly keeping back the persons who have only one telephone on which to dial 0 and who are trying to get a very essential service possibly.

All this arises from the fact that apparently the volume of traffic on the telephone lines has increased considerably. There are several reasons for that. First of all, the lines connected with Dublin to our various towns and cities have been made automatic. The result is that a call from Cork to Dublin can be obtained in a matter of seconds. Other lines to Dublin are in the same position. The result is that they carry a great volume of traffic right into the city. Then around Dublin city and county there are several exchanges which have gone automatic.

The charge has been reduced considerably. Possibly that has encouraged people to make more extensive use of the telephone service. With all these extra exchanges becoming automatic, the subscriber in many of these areas can just walk to the telephone and dial a number when previously it had to go through the local telephone exchange. All that has created a queue through the Central Telephone Exchange.

Even if we double the number of the staff in the Central Telephone Exchange it would not bring relief because it is the equipment that is really necessary to cope with the extra volume of traffic and not extra personnel. I am bringing this matter to the Minister's notice because I had complaints, for instance, from doctors who were trying to call ambulances. There again they had to hold on possibly for five, ten or 15 minutes. The same situation would arise in connection with persons seriously injured on the roads or where people are very ill at home trying to call a doctor. They do not get the necessary reply having dialled O.

Likewise in regard to the fire brigade. Dialling 999 is apparently the only method that is very prompt at the present time. I was speaking to a doctor recently who decided to dial 999 in the hope that, having got through, he could make the urgent call which he had failed to get in the ordinary way by dialling O.

A vast amount of capital has already been provided by the State for the improvement of our telephone services. I think we can boast that they are very excellent services but we have to face the fact that we now have to deal with a huge volume of traffic across the telephone lines, and that we have to provide more equipment and possibly more modern equipment, to ensure that, having put up this excellent network all over the country, the subscribers will be able to get a better service. I am not particularly speaking about private interests, domestic interests, or business interests. I am referring to subscribers in general because, as I say, the heavy volume of traffic across these lines is causing a good deal of loss and inconvenience to people who have become accustomed to relying upon a prompt telephone service.

I do not wish to say much more on this matter because I am sure the Minister will be able to indicate whether a solution can be provided but I noticed in the last few days and the last few weeks that the position is growing worse. Apparently, the more anxious people are to get in contact with the Central Telephone Exchange and dial O the more they are inventing new methods of putting pressure on to the Central Telephone Exchange, which is making the position worse for themselves and more difficult for the staff who are trying to cope with this extra traffic.

I believe that down the country this situation does not confront subscribers and in a general way they are well satisfied with the system provided. There may be an exchange in the country which does not give as efficient a service as it could but in a general way telephone subscribers seem to be getting very good value for the money which they have provided through the State and from their own contributions as subscribers but the position in Dublin city is becoming acute and for that reason I should like to know from the Minister whether it will be possible to make some new arrangement on the existing equipment or to obtain as soon as possible some extra equipment which will relieve the situation which is growing so difficult with the increasing volume of traffic.

Deputy Rooney's Question has in fact been effectively answered by himself when he says that the telephone traffic has increased. Telephone traffic in recent years has increased considerably but the increase in the past year has been abnormal. The Department of Posts and Telegraphs have not had previous experience of the steep increase that has taken place in telephone traffic over, say, the past six months. In some cases the increase is as high as 40 per cent. and 30 per cent. in many exchanges throughout the country. The Department and myself have taken note of the fact and we are making every effort to deal with the increased volume of traffic.

In so far as this question relates primarily to the Central Telephone Exchange I admit that during the past month the situation there has been anything but good. There are reasons for that, but they are not staff reasons. I am advised by officials of my department that an increase in the staff within the exchange itself would not remedy the situation. I want to say that, with the exception of a few days and nights when service was interfered with through cable failures coinciding with periods of heavy traffic, a satisfactory speed of answering was maintained at the Dublin exchange until after the Whit weekend.

The very fine weather combined with an unusually large tourist influx for June for such events as the Canada Cup Tournament, the Dental Congress and the Social Service Conference, created very heavy conditions and this position was aggravated by damage to circuits over a wide area including damage to the southern coaxial cables on two occasions during the past two weeks due to electrical storms. The Department have been unfortunate in that respect. They had six breakdowns in circuits in the month of June for which they were not responsible and which were caused by an electrical fault and one very bad fault which was found underground at Birdhill.

The rate of increase which occurred within the year was entirely unprecedented, as I have already stated, and the extra load placed on exchange equipment impaired the capacity of the exchange to maintain the high standard of service to the public which the Department normally extends. The staff in the exchange have done their best under those circumstances to cope with increased demands and I must say the service for today and yesterday has returned to its normally satisfactory level. I hope it will remain so unless some abnormal traffic occurs which will put the service out of gear.

With the continuing growth of telephone trunk traffic, additional trunk circuits will continue to be required to maintain a satisfactory service. I should like to take this opportunity to inform Deputy Rooney that, in so far as County Dublin is concerned, the Department intend to provide additional circuits from Dublin to exchanges in the Dublin automatic area. These are as follows: Swords, four early in July; Oldtown, one, early July; Maynooth, six, mid-July; Lucan six, mid-July; Rush four, early July; Dunboyne three, early July; Celbridge four, at the end of July and Malahide four in July.

Deputy Rooney in his statement has in a way paid tribute to the Department of Posts and Telegraphs for their expeditious handling of business. I can assure the Deputy that every effort will be made to continue that high standard which the Post Office provides. I get complaints myself from important people in relation to this delay. Several people have complained about the delay at the Central Telephone Exchange for the month of June and I have tried as far as I possibly could by letter to explain the situation which existed. It gives me great pleasure, and I am sure it will be a consolation to Deputy Rooney to know, that there are people who take the other point of view and who congratulate the Department. I have a letter from the Portmarnock Golf Club in connection with this matter which I shall quote. It states:—

It gives me great personal pleasure to write you this letter of thanks on behalf of the Portmarnock Golf Club for the wonderful assistance we received from your staff before and during the Canada Cup matches.

I can say with confidence that their efforts contributed in no small way to the success of the tournament and I would like you to convey our gratitude to them.

The event has helped Ireland in many ways and all our visitors were most impressed and extremely pleased with the arrangements made by your Department for their needs.

Very shortly. Deputy Rooney will have an opportunity of elaborating on this question of service. I hope to have a Telephone Capital Bill introduced in the very near future and it will provide for an extended amount of capital for the purpose of further development in our telephone services. We shall restore the cut that the Capital Account suffered in 1956 and we shall add to that. I hope when the Bill is before the House to be able to give a survey of our telephone needs for the future and what we hope to do in the period covered by the Bill, that is in the ensuing five years.

The Dáil adjourned at 5.20 p.m. until 3 p.m. on Tuesday, 5th July, 1960.

Top
Share