Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 6 Dec 1979

Vol. 317 No. 6

Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Man-Days lost due to Labour Disputes.

32.

asked the Minister for Labour the estimated number of man-days lost due to labour disputes to date in 1979 and the actual figure for the three worst previous years.

The Central Statistics Office is the offical source of statistics relating to man-days lost due to industrial disputes. Statistics are not yet available from that office in relation to disputes which took place during 1979. My Department estimates, however, that approximately 1,352,000 man-days were lost through industrial disputes during the first nine months of 1979 1,118,000 of which were accounted for by the postal dispute.

With the permission of the Ceann Comhairle, I am circulating, for inclusion in the official report, a table giving the figures for each year since 1923.

Year

Total Man-Days Lost

Year

Total Man-Days Lost

1923

1,208,734

1951

545,133

1924

301,705

1952

529,089

1925

293,792

1953

82,046

1926

85,345

1954

66,734

1927

64,020

1955

236,324

1928

54,292

1956

48,069

1929

101,397

1957

92,040

1930

77,417

1958

126,143

1931

310,199

1959

124,479

1932

42,152

1960

80,349

1933

200,126

1961

377,264

1934

180,080

1962

104,024

1935

288,077

1963

233,617

1936

185,623

1964

545,384

1937

1,754,949

1965

556,475

1938

208,784

1966

783,635

1939

106,476

1967

182,645

1940

152,076

1968

405,686

1941

77,133

1969

935,900

1942

115,039

1970

1,007,714

1943

61,807

1971

273,770

1944

38,308

1972

206,955

1945

243,932

1973

206,725

1946

150,108

1974

551,833

1947

449,438

1975

295,716

1948

258,166

1976

776,949

1949

273,151

1977

442,145

1950

216,505

1978

624,266

What was the worst figure in the past ten years?

The worst year was 1970.

In view of the fact that in the first nine months of this year 1.3 million man-days were lost does the Minister not consider that that is the arithmetic of failure and that he should be ashamed that this has happened under him as Minister for Labour? What does he propose to do in an effort to reduce the number of man-days lost in the future?

The Deputy is going into matters he should not go into.

The Minister for Labour is not the only one responsible but I want to know what he is going to do to reduce this terrible figure which has been reached under his regime?

That is the usual sort of stuff that can be expected from Deputy Mitchell.

The country will expect more than a peremptory reply on this matter.

Order, please.

Top
Share