I propose to take Questions Nos. 228 and 229 together.
Since its introduction in 1978 pre-movement testing of cattle for bovine TB and brucellosis has disclosed more than 10,000 reactors. A breakdown on a county basis is not readily available.
Epidemiological surveys carried out by my Department in 1982 and 1983 into the causes of Bovine TB breakdowns suggest that in about 14 per cent of cases the infection may have been attributable to bought-in animals. It is not possible to say what proportion of these herds had a completely clear TB history before the breakdown. Experience prior to 1978 when the statutory pre-movement test was introduced was that a majority of disease breakdowns could be traced back to infected cattle bought into a herd.
The value of the pre-movement test is that it offers protection to the purchaser against buying-in diseased animals, and enables infection in the herds of origin to be detected and tackled much earlier than would be possible by the annual rounds of testing alone. Because of the enormous volume of cattle movement, it plays a vital role in the disease eradication programme.