Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 27 Feb 1992

Vol. 416 No. 4

Adjournment Debate. - Ballymun (Dublin) Motorway Interchange.

The story of the Ballymun interchange is a story of secrecy, deception, lack of public consultation and misuse of EC funds. From start to finish the Dublin County and City Councils involved in this interchange have shown little regard for the interests of the rights of the inhabitants of Ballymun or Glasnevin North. They have also shown little regard for the public representatives of this area and adjoining areas. They have gone so far as to suppress documents which show the true extent of the devastation caused by their plans. They have misled and manipulated councillors and have generally acted in a Stalinist and totally Fascist manner, as if the requirements of democracy, fair play and openness are just disruptive impediments to their grand plans.

The motion passed in the Dublin City Council for a section 59 agreement did not refer in any way to the Ballymun interchange on the route and all local public representatives have gone on record as being unaware of the proposal. The only public consultation was through an advertisement which just referred to the Dublin County Council area and obviously did not attract the attention of the people in Ballymun or Glasnevin North who are in the Dublin Corporation area. The first time the residents learnt of the proposed interchange was in November 1990.

The effects this road will have on the local community are devastating. The Dublin County Council laid them out in their Community Impact Assessment, which says:

Traffic using the Ballymun Road is likely to increase substantially with the Northern Cross route as it will provide a good fast access road... the increase in traffic will mean that it will be generally dangerous to cross the dual carriageway at grade and all crossings will have to be made by subway or bridge... a heavily trafficked dual carriage with a busy roundabout is not suitable for cyclists. Consequently a separate north/south cycleway will be required.

None of this assessment made its way into the published Environmental Impact Study, which says merely that "There will be some severence at local level on a number of individual properties mainly for cyclists and pedestrians.

None of the measures to provide cycle-ways or pedestrian crossings proposed in the Community Impact Assessment are planned. The Community Impact Assessment itself has been suppressed by the council and corporation officials and the City and County Manager has denied its existence. But a copy of this document has come into my possession. It makes shocking reading — no wonder these Stalinist officials suppressed it.

I have to say also that the EIS assessment is a sham. It fails to take into account any indirect problems caused by the motorway. It makes predictions which are obviously wrong, such as predicting a decrease of noise levels on the Ballymun Road from 67 to 59 decibels despite an increase in traffic. In its section on the socio-economic environment it mentions Portmarnock Golf Club and Howth Marina but makes no mention at all of Ballymun, which is recognised as one of the most socially deprived areas in the country.

On a persistent basis in the Dublin County Council and Dublin Corporation the officials have misled councillors. Contrary to the Community Impact Assessment, councillors have been told that the Ballymun Road is suitable for cyclists and that pedestrian bridges can be provided "if it were found necessary at some future date".

Wildly divergent figures for forecast traffic levels have been supplied to the city and county councils based on two conflicting studies. Dublin Corporation are predicting a decrease of 44 per cent in traffic on the Ballymun Road leading to the interchange, whereas Dublin County Council predict an increase of 70 per cent on the same stretch of road.

Council officials have even been willing to solicit letters from Aer Rianta to back up their case and then present them as if they were written on Aer Rianta's own initiative.

Complaints have been lodged with the European Commission and the European Parliament about the lack of consultation and the failure to publish an adequate environmental impact study but council officials deny any knowledge of the investigation which the Commission is carrying out.

The effect on the local community, as I have said, would be devastating. The increase in traffic would pose a major traffic hazard for 8,000 local pupils and students attending schools along the Ballymun Road. The children of the Ballymun flats will find one of their open spaces has been converted into a roundabout and one of the internal roads of the flats converted into an access road for this roundabout. The existing road without the additional traffic is a major hazard in that it runs right through the centre of a large community.

The Minister of State at the Department of the Environment, Deputy Mary Harney, promised the residents she would put their case to the then Minister for the Environment, Deputy Pádraig Flynn, and the Dublin County Council.

She said: "It is obviously unacceptable for a development of this sort to go ahead without proper consultation with the community". I would ask her and the current Minister for the Environment to stand over this and to delete the interchange from the Northern Cross Route.

At the outset I thank the Deputy for affording me the opportunity of putting on the record the procedures which were observed and followed in reaching a decision on the Northern Cross Route Motorway scheme.

The Northern Cross route is the northern leg of the Dublin Ring Road and is a continuation of the Western Parkway Motorway. It will run between the N3 Navan Road at Blanchardstown and the N1 Belfast road at Turnapin. There are also ancillary roads including an extension from Turnapin along the line of Turnapin Lane/Belcamp Lane to the Malahide Road, and the re-alignment of the Ballymun Road where it intersects with the proposed motorway. The new road will be 10.1 kilometres long with a dual two-lane facility.

Interchanges are proposed at four locations — Navan Road, Ashbourne Road, Ballymun Road and at Turnapin on the new Airport Road.

The motorway scheme for the Northern Cross route was prepared by Dublin County Council acting on their own behalf and on behalf of Dublin Corporation in so far as sections of the proposed scheme lie in the administrative area of the corporation.

The county council also prepared an Environmental Impact Study for the scheme in accordance with the European Communities (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Motorways) Regulations of 1988, which give effect to the requirements of the EC Directive on Environmental Impact Assessment in so far as motorways are concerned.

These regulations require that, before making a motorway scheme under section 4 of the Local Government (Roads and Motorways) Act, 1974, a road authority must have regard to the preservation of scenic and natural amenities and must prepare an environmental impact study of the proposed motorway which must identify, describe and assess the direct and indirect environmental effects of the construction of the proposed motorway on human beings, fauna and flora; on soil, water, air, climate and the landscape; on material assets, and on the cultural heritage.

The regulations lay down the type of information which must be provided in an environmental impact study.

On 2 April 1990 Dublin County Council gave public notice of the making of the motorway scheme. The notice advised the general public of the availability for inspection of maps, plans and the Environmental Impact Study relating to the scheme. It also advised the general public that a public inquiry would be held into all matters relating to the scheme and that the Minister, before approving a scheme, would consider the report of the person who conducted the inquiry and any objections which had been made to him and which had not been withdrawn. Notice of the motorway scheme and the Environmental Impact Study were sent individually to persons directly affected by the scheme and to prescribed bodies such as the Office of Public Works, Bord Fáilte and An Taisce.

On 19 June 1990 public notice was given of the holding of a public inquiry into the motorway scheme, including the environmental impact of the proposed motorway, and objections which had been received against its approval. Persons directly affected by the scheme and those who had lodged objections were notified individually of the arrangement. The inquiry was held over three full days from Tuesday 26 June to Thursday 28 June 1990. A total of 39 submissions were lodged with the then Minister before the inquiry and a further five submissions were made by members of the public at the inquiry. After considering the evidence taken at the public inquiry, the report of the inspector who conducted the inquiry and the Environmental Impact Study, the then Minister approved the motorway scheme, subject to modifications, on 7 February 1991. Public notice of the making of that order was given on 28 February 1991.

I point out to the Deputy that the situation following the publication of notice of the approval of a motorway scheme is that persons aggrieved may, not later than 21 days after publication of the notice, apply to the High Court questioning the validity of the motorway scheme as confirmed. No such action was taken in this case.

I am aware of some of the problems which the Deputy has raised. I am equally aware that meetings have been held between Dublin Corporation, Dublin County Council and representatives of the Glasnevin North Community Council, the Ballymun Environmental Task Force and the local elected representatives. These meetings are being held with a view to identifying whatever problems there are and, having identified them, to come up with a solution to them. My understanding is that these meetings are continuing.

Top
Share