Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 1 May 2001

Vol. 535 No. 1

Adjournment Debate. - Children at Risk.

Last night a 15 year old boy spent his second night in a Garda station cell because there was no room for him at a special school in Dublin. The same boy last winter was found without footwear sleeping in an abandoned car. Earlier yesterday, the Children's Court ordered that the boy be retained at the unit in Oberstown, Lusk, but when taken there by gardaí, he was refused entry because the centre was full and so he was taken to a Garda station. Today the case came before the High Court which ruled that the boy should be freed from Garda custody.

Because of this ruling the media focus will lessen. However, the support and help that he needs will not be provided by the State. I ask the Minister of State if she knows where this boy will be accommodated tonight. Has she made any inquiries, and is she taking steps to ensure that his needs are being catered for? What steps are being taken to ensure that he does not become the focus of news headlines in a few months time because there is still no place where he can be cared for appropriately?

The case of a boy of 13, who suffers from attention deficit disorder, highlights this Government's failings. His mother sought help from the Northern Area Health Board but has not received any offers of a place. He lived rough in a park in recent months and had come under the influence of older men. His mother feared that he now was using alcohol and cannabis. There was no appropriate place nor an appropriate response from the State.

Garda stations and park benches are neither suitable nor acceptable places for disturbed teenagers. At a time of unprecedented wealth, it is beyond a disgrace that vulnerable children are treated like this. Last October when Ministers were threatened with contempt of court proceedings over their failure to find a suitable place for a disturbed girl, the Minister of State with responsibility for children appeared on practically every available media slot outlining how she would ensure proper care facilities for children at risk. Six months later, we are not much better off. More children are sleeping rough and those requiring specialist care are not getting it.

There was a recruitment drive for specialist staff to work with disturbed children, but it is only now that attention is given to the appalling wages paid in that sector. It would have made more sense to review the wage rates before the recruitment drive began.

The suitability and availability of care places remains a serious problem. Most detention places and high support units are full, and neither do they offer the most suitable care for particular problems suffered by children.

There is also the problem of the lack of sufficient inspection of child care institutions. To ensure that proper child care is administered, a well staffed inspectorate is needed to enforce the highest standards. I refer to the need to ensure adequate staff in the social services inspectorate, but, more importantly, within the health boards. The latest figures from the ERHA show that only 26% of its residential care units were inspected and a smaller proportion of such units are regis tered. Lessons must be learned from the Newtown House report.

We await the promised legislation for the establishment of an ombudsman for children. The Government attracted much publicity by announcing it would establish this office. Intentions alone will not serve the interests of the children sleeping in doorways, on park benches and in Garda stations tonight. If the Taoiseach could exercise the same vigour in tackling the problems facing disturbed children as he does towards developing a national sports stadium, there would be fewer children arriving in our courts daily. I ask the Minister of State what she is doing to cater for this 15 and 13 year old who were before the courts recently. What provision has she made to meet their urgent needs?

I thank Deputy Shortall for raising this important issue. I share her concerns about a number of matters she raised. However, it would not be appropriate for me to comment on individual cases of children who have come before the courts. I am aware of the circumstances of the cases that were reported in the media and I assure the House of my commitment and that of the Government to providing appropriate services for such children.

The Government's commitment to ‘at risk' children is evidenced by the measures contained in the Children Bill, 1999, published by my colleague the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Deputy O'Donoghue, which is now due to go to Report Stage. The Bill, when enacted, will repeal the Children Act, 1908, and will set out a blueprint for a new juvenile justice system.

In addition to updating the provisions relating to young persons who have been sentenced by the courts, including the obligations of the centres under the aegis of the Department of Education and Science, the Bill provides for a wide range of early interventions and non-custodial alternatives to cater for children coming into conflict with the law or with serious care needs. While the Bill places emphasis on custody being a last resort, it is accepted that for those who do require custody, suitable places have to be available. To this end, both the Departments of Education and Science and Health and Children, through the health boards, have embarked on major capital programmes to upgrade and expand the range of places available for such children. The Government has committed more than £90 million extra for the development of child welfare services through the health boards.

The number of health board high support and special care places for non-offending children increased from 17 in 1996 to a current total of 83, which includes the Ballydowd special care unit being opened on a phased basis. Plans are under way to develop an additional 56 places nationally as follows. In the Eastern Regional Health Authority area, the construction of a high support facility providing 24 places at Portrane is progressing. The Midland Health Board, the North-Western Health Board and the Western Health Board are co-operating to provide 12 high support places on a single campus. In the Mid-Western Health Board area, ten high support places and five special care places for adolescent boys are being developed. In the Southern Health Board area, a five place high support unit for boys is being developed. These places are due to become available within 12 months.

I am confident that the new career and salary structures agreed in the past fortnight with IMPACT after a year of work by the working group, will help not only to attract new people into this career but to retain staff and encourage those who are not qualified to pursue qualifications.

The Department of Education and Science has responsibility for the five centres providing residential accommodation for young people up to the age of 16 who are placed on remand or sentenced to detention by the courts. Development plans have been drawn up by that Department to meet the obligations that will arise under the new legislation. These plans provide for the major refurbishment and updating of the existing facilities at Trinity House, Lusk, and St. Laurence's, Finglas; the phased replacement of the existing outdated facilities at St. Michael's, Finglas, and Oberstown boys and girls centres; the development of new pre-release units to serve the Finglas and Lusk centres; and the development of a new highly specialised secure unit at the Lusk campus.

The overall development programme will extend over the next three to four years. Already, the new pre-release unit at Finglas has been completed and is in operation for over a year. Pre-release facilities for the Lusk campus will be come on stream in autumn this year. The major refurbishment of two units at Trinity House has also been completed. The planning of the new secure unit at Lusk is nearing completion and tenders will be invited shortly. Planning for the new national remand and assessment centre to replace the existing St. Michael's at Finglas is also at an advanced stage and tenders for the construction of this project will be invited later this summer. Arrangements are currently under way for the appointment of a further design team for the replacement of the Oberstown units on a phased basis over the next three to four years.

Meanwhile, in order to keep the Oberstown centres in operation, it has been necessary to carry out urgent major refurbishment works on the existing units. This has resulted in their capacity being significantly reduced over the past number of months. The work is now nearing com pletion and it is expected that the centre will be able to operate at full capacity later this month.

From time to time difficulties arise with accommodating placements for individual children on the first date on which placement is sought in any particular unit due to pressure on places on a given day. In general, the child in these circumstances is either subsequently placed in that unit or in one of the other facilities as an alternative to or pending the availability of a place in the original unit of preference. Regrettably, in exceptional cases, some children have been held in Garda stations.

With the development of new places, the Children Bill, the alternative measures which have been put in place, the special residential services board, the expansion of the social services inspectorate with the appointment of a new permanent chief inspector and an additional inspector being recruited, and the Ombudsman legislation about to be published – it is over a year since I brought it to Government and I have been guaranteed it will be published in the next few months – there will be major changes in the provision of services for children. Real progress has been made but I accept much remains to be done.

Top
Share