Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 15 May 2003

Vol. 566 No. 5

Adjournment Debate. - Schools Refurbishment.

I thank the Minister of State for coming into the House but I am disappointed that the Minister for Education and Science, Deputy Dempsey, has not taken the time to come in to address this Adjournment issue.

I am raising the case of the Beneavin De La Salle College in Finglas. It is a scandal that in 2003, school pupils and staff are expected to function in a school that is totally inadequate, overcrowded and unsafe. Beneavin De La Salle College is a 40 year old building that was not of particularly good quality when it was originally built. The problem is that it has been left in its original state with little or no refurbishment since then. It is overcrowded and needs to be extended and totally upgraded.

It is wrong to expect pupils to operate in a building like this. These pupils come from low and middle income families – they are not well off by any means – and many of those families would be struggling to keep their sons in school. In these circumstances, and in all circumstances related to young people, we should show them respect and try to encourage them to respect education. That is difficult if the State is not prepared to provide adequate school buildings and expects young people to operate in dilapidated, outdated conditions that would be more appropriate to the 1950s.

It is also wrong to expect staff to work in such conditions. No other group of workers would put up with the substandard conditions staff in Beneavin and many other schools are expected to tolerate. All of the school's roofs are leaking and the windows are draughty and need to be replaced urgently. The heating system is completely inadequate – the boiler is 40 years old. When the school was extended in 1981, the same boiler was used and it cannot provide adequate heat to meet even the minimum standards set down for schools.

The toilets are a disgrace, again like something from the 1950s. We should not expect people to put up with such conditions. The science rooms are the original rooms from 40 years ago, completely dilapidated with the original furniture still in place. One of the science rooms was seriously damaged in a fire in 1998. One of the walls was badly burnt and it has not been replaced or repaired because the school was told to wait for the full refurbishment job. The school now, therefore, has a science room with a fire damaged wall, ancient furniture and equipment. This is at a time when we are trying to encourage young people to take an interest in the sciences but it is clear to them that the Government is not interested in teaching the sciences in a modern environment. Mixed messages are being sent.

The computer room is in a converted toilet, the technology room in a converted football changing room and the library in a converted cloakroom. All of those conversions were carried out over the years by the teaching staff in their own time at the weekends or during holidays with no assistance whatsoever from the Department of Education and Science.

The construction studies room is a health and safety nightmare. I was in it myself recently and it is a tiny room that cannot accommodate the class, never mind the materials and equipment. There is no proper storage and it is seriously overcrowded and undoubtedly unsafe. The geography room is also unsafe. It is inaccessible to students with disabilities as there is no lift in the school and it is upstairs. There is no art room, music room or facilities for drama. In spite of that, the school stages an annual show with the latest taking place in a local football club during the past week.

Incredibly, in spite of the appalling conditions that everyone in the school endures, student numbers are rising, with an enrolment of almost 400 at present and a steadily rising trend in the past five years. That is a credit to the staff and the quality of teaching provided.

Umpteen meetings have been held between the board of management and officials in the Department, including two that took place in Tullamore to which people had to travel. Negotiations have been ongoing since 1999. In December 2002, planning permission was obtained for phase one, half of the work. The Department has now told the school to seek planning permission for the second half of that work. I am seeking an assurance from the Minister that this is not another delaying tactic. I ask the Minister not to trot out the usual statistics and tell us what he will do in the coming years, but to tell us what he intends to do for the students and staff in Beneavin De La Salle College in Finglas because they urgently need the modern conditions conducive to learning that they deserve to be put in place. The Minster of State's colleague, Deputy Noel Ahern, will testify that current conditions are completely inadequate and unfair.

I am glad the Deputy has given me the opportunity to discuss the position regarding the upgrading of school accommodation at Beneavin De La Salle College.

To date, the Department of Education and Science has invested heavily in Beneavin de la Salle College. In 1999 the school hall, which was originally built in 1961 as a concert hall, was subject to an arson attack. The hall was badly damaged and, as a result of the fire, had to be completely demolished. A design team was appointed to rebuild the hall. Although funding was obtained from the school's insurers, the bulk of the funding came from the Department. The school was granted a new sports hall in the area of 608 square meters plus ancillary, giving a total approved area of 806 square metres at a cost of €1,574,152. The Department of Education and Science provided funding in the amount of €915,667. Additionally all the design team fees for the project were paid. Funding was also provided in the amount of €24,125 for the provision of screening to the balcony area.

An examination of the school's accommodation at the time of the commencement of the PE hall project noted that the school was in need of refurbishment. Consistent with standard practice in the Department's building unit, a schedule of overall accommodation was prepared, based on a long-term projected enrolment of 450 pupils, comprising a total area of 3,990 square metres. This was duly agreed with the school's board of management. The design team that was appointed for the PE hall project was retained for the proposed refurbishment-extension project. A number of options for the refurbishment-extension at the school were advanced – refurbishment of the entire school and an extension with the demolition of the administration building, part new build, part refurbishment or a new school building.

A meeting was held in the Tullamore office of the Department of Education and Science in December 2000 with officials from the building unit, the school management authority and its design team to discuss the possible options. It was agreed by all parties at this meeting that option two – part new build, part refurbishment – was the most feasible because it represented the best value for money. The school management authority welcomed this choice since it meant that some of the original buildings would remain as a link with the past history of the school. The design team was advised to progress the project to stage two – outline sketch scheme – based on option two.

When stage two was submitted to the Department in August 2000, it was noted that projected costs for the project exceeded the European Union thresholds for the appointment of a design team. To comply with procurement procedures in the matter of the design team appointments, it has been necessary to split this project into two separate phases.

The phase one works consist of demolition of the science block and canteen block, construction of a new two storey classroom extension to the existing main classroom block to the front of the school and associated landscaping, car parking and ancillary works. All remaining works will be addressed as part of phase two.

Phase one has progressed through architectural planning and the design team is currently in the process of preparing stages four and five – detail design-bill of quantities – of architectural planning. The project is included in section six of the 2003 schools building programme, which includes large-scale building projects that are at an advanced stage of architectural planning, the pre-tender stage. The timing of when the phase one works at Beneavin de la Salle College can progress to tender and construction is dependent on the funding in 2004 and subsequent years.

Top
Share