Skip to main content
Normal View

Seanad Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 7 Jul 1999

Vol. 160 No. 5

National Beef Assurance Scheme Bill, 1999: Committee Stage (Resumed). SECTION 19.

Debate resumed on amendment No. 4:
In page 16, between lines 6 and 7, to insert the following new subsection:
"(2)Teagasc, where requested, shall provide clarification and assistance to any farmer requesting same in the completion of the returns required by subsection (2) for certification of approval".
–(Senator Caffrey).

Teagasc is a Government agency which provides information and education and it will be involved in offering advice and help to farmers in relation to the provisions of the Bill. It would not be appropriate to legislate for that because Teagasc is obliged, under the various Acts which relate to it, to offer assistance and advice to farmers in any event.

I assure the House that together with offering advice and assistance with regard to the Bill, a major, well advertised education campaign will be launched. Groups of farmers will be able to attend meetings and farmers will be able to receive advice on an individual basis. This is a major and detailed item of legislation.

I take Senator Quinn's point on DNA. I am well acquainted with Dr. Paddy Cunningham and well aware of the work he is carrying out in Trinity College. That work will have far-reaching consequences because it will offer the ultimate in traceability and if the cost is reasonable, the methods will be widely used. With Teagasc, the Department will conduct major information campaigns directed specifically at farmers before the national beef assurance scheme is implemented.

It was my understanding that the debate would conclude before 4.30 p.m. I have given assurances that the Bill will be well aired during the summer and that there will be sufficient time to consider amendments on Report Stage. It would help if the amendments tabled were moved.

Acting Chairman

It was agreed on the Order of Business that the order would resume after statements on Northern Ireland.

Amendment put.

Burke, Paddy.Caffrey, Ernie.Coghlan, Paul.Connor, John.Cregan, Dino.Gallagher, Pat.Henry, Mary.

Jackman, Mary.McDonagh, Jarlath.O'Meara, Kathleen.Quinn, Feargal.Ridge, Thérèse.Taylor-Quinn, Madeleine.

Níl

Bohan, Eddie.Callanan, Peter.Cassidy, Donie.Chambers, Frank.Cox, Margaret.Cregan, JohnDardis, John.Finneran, Michael.Fitzgerald, Liam.Fitzgerald, Tom.Fitzpatrick, Dermot.Keogh, Helen.

Kett, Tony.Kiely, Daniel.Kiely, Rory.Leonard, Ann.Lydon, Don.Moylan, Pat.O'Brien, Francis.O'Donovan, Denis.Ó Murchú, Labhrás.Ormonde, Ann.Quill, Máirín.Walsh, Jim.

Tellers: Tá, Senators Burke and Ridge; Níl, Senators T. Fitzgerald and Keogh.
Amendment declared lost.
Progress reported; Committee to sit again.

Is it appropriate to propose an amendment to the Order of Business?

No. The Leader is the only person who can do that.

Top
Share