Skip to main content
Normal View

Thursday, 29 Mar 2018

Written Answers Nos. 311-331

Agri-Environment Options Scheme Data

Questions (311)

Charlie McConalogue

Question:

311. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the number of persons in receipt of AEOS payments who have received the 85% advance payment of their 2017 payment, by county, in tabular form; the number of persons that have passed all payment approval checks and are awaiting the 85% portion of the 2017 payment; the number of AEOS recipients that have yet to receive this portion of payment by county; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14838/18]

View answer

Written answers

The following table outlines the current position. The number to be finalised of 497 includes 430 cases where participants have already transformed to GLAS but may be due payment on capital investments for 2017 under their AEOS contract. These cases must be examined to verify that all AEOS scheme payments were correctly made before the final 2017 AEOS payment can be released. Payments are continuing to issue as cases are finalised.

County

Numbers paid for 2017

Numbers to be finalised for 2017

Carlow

8

3

Cavan

71

10

Clare

118

17

Cork

84

54

Donegal

291

83

Dublin

3

1

Galway

346

48

Kerry

157

44

Kildare

5

2

Kilkenny

19

5

Laois

17

1

Leitrim

151

16

Limerick

52

9

Longford

18

5

Louth

12

3

Mayo

318

92

Meath

22

1

Monaghan

46

8

Offaly

21

10

Roscommon

127

40

Sligo

83

18

Tipperary

34

12

Waterford

17

7

Westmeath

29

1

Wexford

10

3

Wicklow

12

4

Total

2071

497

Agriculture Scheme Data

Questions (312)

Charlie McConalogue

Question:

312. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine further to Parliamentary Question No. 238 of 15 February 2018, if all the data requested have been compiled. [14839/18]

View answer

Written answers

For Pillar 1, my Department does not have an allocation of funding per se from the National Vote. Rather, national ceilings are set out in the relevant EU Regulations, and the Department manages the expenditure on all Pillar 1 schemes with reference to these ceilings. The relevant ceilings as set out in the EU Regulations are as follows:

-

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

Ceiling

€1,216m

€1,215m

€1,214m

€1,212m

€1,212m

€1,211m

€1,211m

In managing Pillar 1 expenditure with reference to these ceilings, regular reports are compiled and submitted to the EU Commission. This reporting then underpins the drawdown of EU funds to match Pillar 1 expenditure already undertaken. Expenditure figures are collated in a number of different ways in order to fulfil the regulatory reporting requirements – for example, scheme year expenditure is tracked along with expenditure in a given calendar year. Across these levels of expenditure tracking there are also set EU rules for how expenditure is counted against the ceilings – for example, expenditure in respect of a given scheme year which is paid out in a different calendar year may in certain circumstances be required to be reported against both the calendar and scheme year ceiling.

Bearing these regulatory reporting requirements in mind, the following table sets out the number of farmers and the amount paid out to date in respect of each scheme year:

-

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

Payments to farmers

€1,170m

€1,194m

€1,188m

€1,168m

N/A

N/A

N/A

Number paid

121,985

126,923

124,517

123,073

N/A

N/A

N/A

These figures represent the amounts paid out under BPS, the Young Farmer Scheme, the National Reserve, Greening, and the Protein Aid Scheme. The figures are net of penalties and overpayments which may apply in certain circumstances.

In order to manage expenditure with reference to the ceilings, there are a number of other factors to be also taken into account. For example, in respect of the 2014 figure modulation is not included in these figures.

Also, the figures in respect of the reimbursement of the Financial Discipline are not included in the above table. Each year, a proportion of the Pillar 1 funds is withheld centrally at EU level to cater for any events which may give rise to the need to allocate money from the “Crisis Reserve” fund which this withheld money creates. If this reserve is not utilised, it is redistributed to individual Member States at a later date. For example, in June 2017 my Department made payments totalling €13.6m to 96,000 farmers who were eligible under the 2016 BPS. This money had previously been withheld at EU level from the 2015 BPS payments under the Financial Discipline rules. The payment of this Financial Discipline across scheme and calendar years also has to be taken into account in managing the expenditure with reference to the national ceilings.

For each annual ceiling, there will also be cases that fall to be paid outside the bulk of the payment runs made in the October to December period in each year. For example, particularly protracted legal cases, cases where errors remain to be rectified, and appeal cases will fall to be paid in later years. These cases also require to be taken into account in the management of the ceilings.

Livestock Issues

Questions (313)

Charlie McConalogue

Question:

313. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine further to Parliamentary Questions Nos. 551 and 553 of 14 December 2017, if all the data requested have been compiled. [14840/18]

View answer

Written answers

The information requested by the Deputy is as follows.  The livestock unit data in each case is based on cattle and sheep data held by my Department.

Table 1 - Livestock units per hectare and BPS value per hectare

Range of average BPS value per hectare  - €

Livestock Unit per hectare

0-100

0.75

100-200

1.20

200-300

1.60

300-400

1.78

400-500

1.70

500-600

1.71

600-700

1.62

700-800

1.50

800-900

1.27

900-1000

1.28

>1000

1.18

 

Table 2 - Livestock units per hectare and category of land (ANC scheme)

ANC category

Livestock unit per hectare

Island

0.50

Less Severe

1.40

More Severe

1.11

Mountain land

0.47

Non ANC

1.31

Rural Development Programme

Questions (314)

Charlie McConalogue

Question:

314. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if a review of the rural development programme, RDP, targets, both participation and expenditure levels, committed to originally has commenced in view of the passing of the motion supporting the suckler sector on 21 February 2018 in Dáil Éireann; if so, if the two-month deadline for the review to be completed will be met; and if not, the reason therefor. [14841/18]

View answer

Written answers

The implementation of the Rural Development Programme is reviewed on an on-going basis to ensure that EU objectives are met and that all EU funding is fully drawn down.  The latest review, just completed,  confirms that the entire budget of some €4 billion is fully committed and expected to be spent and therefore no new schemes under the RDP can be considered at this time.

Rural Development Programme Funding

Questions (315)

Charlie McConalogue

Question:

315. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the financial allocations on an annual basis under the 2014-2020 RDP for schemes (details supplied) in tabular form; the annual amount expended on these schemes in each year since established; the number of active participants in the schemes; and the number of applicants that have withdrawn from same. [14842/18]

View answer

Written answers

The information requested by the Deputy is set out in the tables:

Table 1 – Voted Allocations for Schemes 2014-2018, Expenditure 2014-2017

-

Knowledge Transfer Scheme

GLAS

Beef Data and Genomics Programme

TAMS II

Sheep Welfare Scheme

Hen Harrier Programme

Allocation 2015

0

20,000,000

35,000,000

0

0

0

Expenditure 2015

0

11,452,500

34,692,000

0

0

0

Allocation 2016

0

139,500,000

52,000,000

28,000,000

0

0

Expenditure 2016

0

102,615,247

61,800,000

3,971,000

0

0

Allocation 2017

22,821,000

228,500,000

49,000,000

49,832,000

17,000,000

3,000,000

Expenditure 2017

13,784,000

195,583,187

47,137,000

31,256,000

15,851,000

717,000

Allocation 2018

23,000,000

203,000,000

49,500,000

69,943,000

20,000,000

3,500,000

The above are the total allocations and expenditure for the schemes. In a few cases, small parts of the allocation and expenditure for schemes are not co-funded.

Table 2 – No. of participants and withdrawals

-

Knowledge Transfer Scheme

GLAS

Beef Data and Genomics Programme

TAMS II

Sheep Welfare Scheme

Hen Harrier Programme

Number of active participants

19,100

49,404

24,788

12,849

20,845

366

Number of applicants that have withdrawn

260

2,193

5,909

300

340

0

GLAS Data

Questions (316)

Charlie McConalogue

Question:

316. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the average annual payment per person under the green low carbon agri-environment scheme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14843/18]

View answer

Written answers

The average annual GLAS payment is €4,155 and the average annual GLAS+ payment is €1,450.

TAMS Funding

Questions (317)

Charlie McConalogue

Question:

317. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if TAMS II funds can be carried forward; and if not, if they must be returned to the Exchequer or the EU budget in view of the fact that the first TAMS II approvals are now starting to lapse as the time for applying for payment has expired. [14844/18]

View answer

Written answers

The TAMS budget for the duration of the RDP (2014-2020) is €395m. Payment claims continue to be received and processed on an ongoing basis, as is the case with applications for approval. The number of TAMS II outstanding approvals is currently 9,500. The usage of the budget is dependent on the volume and value of payment claims submitted by approved participants as they complete their approved works and the expenditure is monitored closely.

I would encourage all farmers who have an approval in place to undertake their planned investments and to submit a payment claim as soon as the approved work is completed. The budget of €395m is in place for that purpose.

As regards the contribution of national and EU funding for RDP schemes, all expenditure on schemes is nationally funded in the first instance and the co funded amounts are then claimed in arrears from the EU. Exchequer funds are allocated on an annual basis with estimated annual requirements taking account of commitments expected to mature within that period and within overall budget constraints. Public Financial Procedures provide scope to carry-over up to 10% of a Department’s total capital allocation from one year to the following year. Any unspent EAFRD funds in a year are carried forward to subsequent years and the overall amount of €2.19 billion EAFRD funding for the entire period is not affected.

Farm Safety

Questions (318, 319)

Charlie McConalogue

Question:

318. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if rural development programme, RDP, schemes operated in other member states (details supplied) that have significantly reduced farm fatalities have been examined with a view to consideration for roll-out here. [14845/18]

View answer

Charlie McConalogue

Question:

319. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the input by his Department into the first meeting of farm safety task force; and the actions agreed. [14851/18]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 318 and 319 together.

Farm safety is a critical issue facing our industry. Over the last ten years 210 people have been killed on Irish farms. 23 of these were children and 74 were elderly people. Accidents on farms cause more workplace deaths than all other occupations combined. Last year there were 24 fatal accidents on farms accounting for over 50% of all workplace fatalities.

Sadly there have already been 4 fatal farm accidents this year. Each of these deaths is a tragedy and we must work together to reduce deaths and accidents on our farms. Every single farmer must make time and take responsibility for safety on their farm to ensure they and their families and employees are working in as safe an environment as possible.

The Farm Safety Interdepartmental Task Force was set up to focus on this important area and my Department is a participant. My Department highlighted its on-going efforts under Ireland’s current Rural Development Programme, including:

- A Farm Safety Scheme that was opened as part of the Targeted Agricultural Modernisation Schemes (TAMS II) round of on-farm investment schemes.

- As part of all the TAMS II strands, it is mandatory to have completed a minimum of a ½ day farm safety course on completing the Code of Practice within the last five years.

- ‘Health and Safety’ guidelines are included in all ‘Building Specifications,’ drawn up by my Department for the construction of agricultural buildings and structures. The guidelines give advice on best practice and legislation.

- A mandatory Health and Safety element is included in all Knowledge Transfer (KT) Groups under the 2014-2020 RDP. All KT Groups held a meeting on the theme of farm health and safety in Year One of the Programme. Farmer participants also complete, for each of the three years of the Programme, a tailored Farm Improvement Plan with their approved KT Facilitator which includes a component related to farm health and safety. In addition to attending group meetings farmers have the option to attend an approved Knowledge Transfer National Event such as a farm walk in lieu of two meetings. Since the commencement of the Programme 11 of these events have addressed the topic of farm health and safety.

In addition, training on farm health and safety was delivered to approximately 300 KT Facilitators under the Continuous Professional Development measure.

The group is reviewing stakeholder submissions and considering further opportunities for interventions in what is a critical challenge for the industry.

With regards to the future of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) post 2020, the recent public consultation process organised by my Department allowed for views and possible approaches to be discussed and coincided with an invitation to make written submissions on the future of the CAP. Any measure that can reduce farm fatality rates will be given utmost consideration when finalising Ireland’s position during future discussions of the CAP post 2020.

Fisheries Protection

Questions (320)

Charlie McConalogue

Question:

320. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine his views on the recent publication by the European Commission on its multi-annual plan for fish stocks in the western waters which are located within the Atlantic Ocean. [14853/18]

View answer

Written answers

The EU Commission published on 23 March 2018 a proposal establishing a multiannual plan for fish stocks in the Western Waters and adjacent waters, and for fisheries exploiting those stocks. The proposal covers whitefish and nephrops stocks on which much of our polyvalent segment of the fleet is strongly dependent.

I have asked our stakeholders for initial comments and I will be seeking detailed views over the coming weeks and months as the proposal is negotiated within the Internal Fisheries Working Group. The proposal will be formally presented at the next EU Fisheries Council on 16 April.

The EU Commission set down the main elements of the proposal:

- Simplifying fisheries management under one main regulatory framework, including existing plans;

- while fully respecting the 2020 objective of Fmsy (maximum sustainable yield) the plan will allow a certain flexibility in setting the fishing opportunities, where such a flexibility is needed in order to manage for example mixed fisheries. This flexibility, known as 'ranges of Fmsy', is proposed as the management method for the most commercially important demersal stocks - the target stocks;

- Following the precautionary approach for bycatch stocks, taking into account mixed fisheries;

- Allowing provisions for the landing obligation and technical conservation measures to be put forward by the North Western Waters Advisory Council and the North Western Waters MS Group for the fisheries that concern them most.

Agriculture Schemes

Questions (321)

Charlie McConalogue

Question:

321. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine his plans to introduce a reclamation and drainage scheme; the status of the A Programme for A Partnership Government commitment to include a measure on clearing drains in the farm safety scheme under TAMS; and the timeline for implementation of same. [14854/18]

View answer

Written answers

The budget for the Targeted Agriculture Modernisation scheme (TAMS) of €395m under the Development programme is fully committed at this stage. It is not possible to include additional investment items within the available budget. Support for land drainage is not included as an eligible item in the current programme.

Forestry Management

Questions (322)

Jackie Cahill

Question:

322. Deputy Jackie Cahill asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if he and the Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht have examined with forestry and farming groups the idea of introducing a forestry management protocol covering special protection areas important to the hen harrier which will allow an annual quota of new plantings in the areas involved. [14857/18]

View answer

Written answers

I understand that the draft Hen Harrier Threat Response Plan is nearing completion and is currently being refined by the Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht in consultation with Departmental stakeholders. I also understand that the draft will shortly be circulated to the Consultative Committee (which includes representatives from across the relevant sectors, including the forestry sector) with a view to publication for public consultation after Easter.

My Department and the forestry sector representatives submitted separate proposals earlier in the process, relating to the management of the existing forest estate and the potential for compatible afforestation. These proposals, along with those from other sectors and stakeholders, have been considered, and the soon-to-be-released draft will create the basis for the next stage of the Threat Response Plan’s development.

Dairy Sector

Questions (323)

Jackie Cahill

Question:

323. Deputy Jackie Cahill asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the status of the latest EU auction on skimmed milk powder; the tonnes to date of skimmed milk powder intervention product purchased; the way in which the tendering process for intervention in 2018 is proceeding; and if the EU Commission is still offering €1,698 per tonne as obligated under the 2013 CMO regulation in 2018. [14859/18]

View answer

Written answers

As the Deputy will be aware, the Irish dairy market, following on from broader EU and international trends, is currently in a much improved position compared to the relatively recent past. Of course, we remain vigilant in monitoring the market and emerging trends, particularly as we approach the peak period for Irish milk production.

The issue of intervention stocks overhanging the dairy market remains a cause for concern arising from the significant recourse to this market measure for skimmed milk powder across the EU since September 2015.

Figures from the European Commission show there were approximately 376,000 tonnes of skimmed milk powder in public intervention stocks at the end of February effectively overhanging the EU skimmed milk powder market.

With specific regard to the tonnes of skimmed milk powder purchased into intervention, no quantities have been purchased since October 2017 as detailed in the most recent Milk Market Observatory Report published by the European Commission 23/03/2018. A total of 30,647 tonnes were offered to intervention in 2017, this is in addition to 334,551 tonnes offered in 2016 and 40,280 offered in 2015.

In relation to the sale of intervention stocks, the Commission has agreed to accept bids as part of its most recent tender process, for approximately 4,127 tonnes of SMP at a price of €105/100kg. A further 4337 tonnes were sold at a price of €110/100kg in February 2018 and a total of 1564 tonnes at a price of €119/100kg in January 2018.

Regarding the price offered by the Commission as referred to and the Commission’s approach to this generally, my Department and I engaged at Council of Ministers meetings and directly with the Commission on recent measures to limit further stockpiling of skimmed milk powder in 2018 without due justification, including the Commission's proposal to reduce the fixed-price ceiling to zero. I strongly argued that this measure should be specified as for 2018 only to avoid setting a precedent for the longer term. This point was accepted and agreed in the final version of the measure as adopted by the Council through Regulation No. (EU) 2018/147 of 29 January 2018.

I have clearly stated previously, at Council of Ministers meetings and elsewhere, that it is imperative that the Commission remains vigilant in monitoring the market and that it has contingencies in place in the event of market volatility re-emerging in relevant markets, particularly the raw milk, butter and skimmed milk powder markets. In common with the vast majority of EU member states where dairy production is of significance, I recognised that the current position on existing stocks could not be allowed to persist indefinitely and that there is general acceptance that doing nothing is not an option.

Given the Commission's status among the world’s biggest players on the skimmed milk powder market, and as such its capacity to affect market sentiment, the Commission should act prudently and responsibly in the disposal of stocks. I am satisfied to date that the Commission has managed those stocks in a prudent manner.

My Department has engaged and will continue to engage with the Commission, with other member states, and with national stakeholders on these important issues.

Organic Farming Scheme Eligibility

Questions (324)

Michael Fitzmaurice

Question:

324. Deputy Michael Fitzmaurice asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the payments a person (details supplied) should receive for the organics farming scheme each year since the commencement date of the scheme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14904/18]

View answer

Written answers

The person named is a participant in the Organic Farming Scheme. The area eligible for payment is the amount declared as organic on BPS for the year in question. However it should be noted that parcels included on certain actions in GLAS are not entitled to payment in the Organic Farming Scheme.

The person named has selected the GLAS actions Low Input Permanent Pasture and Traditional Hay Meadows so parcels that contain these actions are not entitled to a payment under the Organic Farming Scheme.

The Organic Farming Scheme attracts a payment of €220 per hectare during the 24 month in-conversion period and €170 per hectare for the remainder of the contract. The contract start date of the person named was 1 June 2015. Accordingly for 2017 he is entitled to payment for 7 months at the higher in-conversion rate and 5 months at the maintenance rate on an area eligible for payment under the Organic Farming Scheme of 23.494 hectares.

Organic Farming Scheme Payments

Questions (325)

Michael Fitzmaurice

Question:

325. Deputy Michael Fitzmaurice asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the payments a person (details supplied) received for the organics farming scheme each year since the commencement date of the scheme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14905/18]

View answer

Written answers

The person named is a participant in the Organic Farming Scheme. The area eligible for payment is the amount declared as organic on BPS for the year in question. However it should be noted that parcels included on certain actions in GLAS or AEOS are not entitled to payment in the Organic Farming Scheme.

The person named has selected the GLAS actions Low Input Permanent Pasture and Traditional Hay Meadows so parcels that contain these actions are not entitled to a payment under the Organic Farming Scheme. He was previously an applicant in the AEOS and had selected actions there which similarly meant that some areas were not payable under the Organic Farming Scheme.

The Organic Farming Scheme attracts a payment of €220 per hectare during the 24 month in conversion period and €170 per hectare for the remainder of the contract. The contract start date of the person named was 1 June 2015.

Accordingly in 2017 he is entitled to payment for 7 months at the higher in conversion rate and 5 months at the maintenance rate on an area eligible for payment under the Organic Farming Scheme of 23.494 hectares. Due to his participation in AEOS he was not entitled to an Organic Farming Scheme payment on certain parcels therefore his area for payment in the Organic Farming Scheme in 2015 and 2016 was 13.79 hectares and 17.57 hectares respectively.

The following payments were processed in this case

2015 Advance Payment €1375.52

2015 Balance Payment €242.74

2015 Additional Payment €67.23

2016 Advance Payment €3287.40

2016 Balance Payment €580.20

2017 Advance Payment €3898.23

Organic Farming Scheme

Questions (326)

Michael Fitzmaurice

Question:

326. Deputy Michael Fitzmaurice asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if the area eligible under the organic farming scheme is 23.58 hectares for a person (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14906/18]

View answer

Written answers

The person named is a participant in the Organic Farming Scheme. The area eligible for payment is the amount declared as organic on BPS for the year in question. However it should be noted that parcels included on certain actions in GLAS are not entitled to payment in the Organic Farming Scheme.

The person named has selected the GLAS actions Low Input Permanent Pasture and Traditional Hay Meadows so parcels that contain these actions are not entitled to a payment under the Organic Farming Scheme.

Accordingly the area eligible for payment under the Organic Farming Scheme is 23.494 hectares.

Electric Vehicles

Questions (327, 349, 354)

Robert Troy

Question:

327. Deputy Robert Troy asked the Minister for Communications, Climate Action and Environment the amount spent on constructing and maintaining the electric vehicle charging network in each year since 2011; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14880/18]

View answer

Timmy Dooley

Question:

349. Deputy Timmy Dooley asked the Minister for Communications, Climate Action and Environment the process by which faulty or damaged electric vehicle charging points are identified and repaired; the average turnaround time for a charging point to be repaired; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14885/18]

View answer

Timmy Dooley

Question:

354. Deputy Timmy Dooley asked the Minister for Communications, Climate Action and Environment the estimated cost of extending the Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland electric vehicle grant in each of the years 2021 to 2026, assuming the 2020 targets for electric vehicle usage are met and not met, respectively. [14891/18]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 327, 349 and 354 together.

The Electric Vehicle purchase grant, administered by the Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland, has been in place since 2011.  A total of €6 million has allocated for payments under the scheme in my Department’s budget this year .

The purchase grant scheme will be kept under review in relation to funding and grant amounts for future years.  As the purchase grant scheme is demand-led it is not possibly to accurately predict how many vehicles will be supported in future years.

The existing fleet of electric vehicle charge points was rolled out by the ESB, through its eCars programme. There are approximately 900  charge points in Ireland of which circa 70 are rapid chargers. The operation and repair of these charge points are an operational matter for the ESB.

In March 2014, the Commission for Regulation of Utilities approved an application from ESB Networks to recover the costs of a pilot project to a maximum of €25 million from use of system charges to cover the rollout of this infrastructure.

The Commission for Regulation of Utilities determined in October 2017 that the charging network should not form part of the regulated asset base and therefore development of the network should not be funded from use of system charges. The decision envisages the continued ownership of the charging network by ESB Networks for a transitional period of up to ten years, ensuring no short to medium term impact on the electric vehicle charging infrastructure. The decision also set out the need for the electric vehicle charging infrastructure to operate on a commercial basis. 

The Low Emissions Vehicle Taskforce is currently examining how best to support the development of public chargers and funding of €1.8m has been allocated in my Department's budget this year to support the provision of public charging.

Nuclear Plants

Questions (328)

Catherine Murphy

Question:

328. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Communications, Climate Action and Environment if a communication has been received from the UK Government in respect of the UK national policy statement for nuclear power above 1 GW single reactor capacity post 2025 (details supplied); if so, when the communication was received; the nature of that communication; if a copy will be made available; the way in which this communication was handled by his Department; the response issued in respect of same; if the response will be made available; if no response issued, the reason therefor; if Ireland is being formally consulted by the UK on this matter; if not, if the State is seeking to assert such consultation rights; if not, the reason therefor; his plans to provide for public consultation on the matter; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14501/18]

View answer

Written answers

While I have not received direct communication from the United Kingdom Government in this matter, I am aware that my colleague the Minister for Housing, Planning and Local Government received correspondence from the United Kingdom authorities on 7 December 2017, informing him of the carrying out of a public consultation on the process and criteria for designating potentially suitable sites in a new National Policy Statement for nuclear power projects with over 1GW of single reactor capacity for the period 2026-2035.   

The correspondence was subsequently forwarded to my Department, and the matter will be discussed at next month's meeting of the United Kingdom-Ireland Contact Group on Radiological Matters. This group, comprising officials from United Kingdom and Irish Government Departments, and scientific agencies responsible for ensuring radiological safety, meet biannually to discuss matters of interest to both parties including the United Kingdom's new nuclear build programme.

Nuclear Waste

Questions (329, 330, 331)

Catherine Murphy

Question:

329. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Communications, Climate Action and Environment if communication has been received from the UK Government in respect of proposals for engaging communities in Northern Ireland and England that may wish to host a geological disposal facility for radioactive waste (details supplied); if so, when the communication was received; the nature of the communication; if a copy will be made available; the way in which this communication was handled by his Department; the response in respect of same; if the response will be made available; if no response issued, the reason therefor; if Ireland is being formally consulted by the UK on this matter; if not, if the State is seeking to assert such consultation rights; if not, the reason therefor; his plans to provide for public consultation on the matter; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14502/18]

View answer

Catherine Murphy

Question:

330. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Communications, Climate Action and Environment if Ireland has received communication from the UK Government in respect of a national policy statement for geological disposal infrastructure (details supplied); if so, when the communication was received; the nature of that communication; if a copy will be made available to Dáil Éireann; the way in which this communication was handled by his Department; the response from the State in respect of same; if the response is available to Dáil Éireann; if no response issued, the reason therefor; if Ireland is being formally consulted by the UK on this matter; if not, if the State is seeking to assert such consultation rights; if not, the reason therefor; his plans to provide for public consultation on the matter; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14503/18]

View answer

Catherine Murphy

Question:

331. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Communications, Climate Action and Environment if communication has been received from the Welsh Government in respect of proposals for engaging communities in Wales that may wish to host a geological disposal facility for radioactive waste; if so, when the communication was received; the nature of that communication; if a copy will be made available; the way in which this communication was handled by his Department; the response that was issued in respect of same; if the response will be made available; if no response issued, the reason therefor; if Ireland is being formally consulted by the UK on this matter; if not, if the State is seeking to assert such consultation rights; if not, the reason therefor; his plans to provide for public consultation on the matter; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14504/18]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 329 to 331, inclusive, together.

I have not received communication from the United Kingdom Government in this matter.

I understand that consultations have commenced within the UK to enable stakeholders and members of the public to submit comments on the geological disposal programme. These consultations are of a general nature and are appropriate to an internal UK audience.

The United Kingdom-Ireland Contact Group on Radiological Matters, comprising officials from United Kingdom and Irish Government Departments, and scientific agencies responsible for ensuring radiological safety, meet biannually to discuss matters of interest to both parties, including long-term strategies to safely store radiological and nuclear waste. Ireland will engage on this matter through this group, which will meet in Dublin next month, and continue to monitor developments in this area.

Top
Share