Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 9 Jun 1998

Vol. 492 No. 1

Priority Questions. - Land Commission.

Willie Penrose

Question:

4 Mr. Penrose asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food if he has considered in detail the provisions of the Irish Land Commission (Dissolution) Act, 1992; if so, the mechanism, if any, he will put in place to adjudicate upon claims relating to vesting orders and dissolution of trusts, particularly in relation to cow parks which were formerly carried out by lay commissioners; if he will give an assurance that a tribunal will be set up to deal with these quasi-judicial matters; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [13702/98]

The Irish Land Commission (Dissolution) Act, 1992, provides in section 4 for the transfer to the Minister for Agriculture and Food of the continuing powers and functions of the Land Commission and of the lay commissioners. The Act further provides that the Minister for Agriculture and Food may exercise any of these powers and functions, including those referred to by the Deputy, or delegate their exercise to officers of the Department.

Outline arrangements have already been made for the framework within which the transferred powers and functions, including the quasi-judicial functions of the lay commissioners, can be exercised within the Department when the Act is commenced. I do not see the need for the setting up of a tribunal in this regard.

This Act was signed into law on 11 November 1992. I wish to place on record my disapproval of the dissolution of the Land Commission and the failure to replace it with any other land agency. We are reaping the whirlwind of the failure to do so.

It has been almost six years since the passing of the Act, and I am aware there were legal interventions which I will not deal with in any detail. However, we should have introduced a land authority in place of the Land Commission. This was warranted and is even more warranted now.

Section 14.3 of the Land Commission Act gave the Minister power to bring the authority into operation on such a day as he appointed by order. The Minister says he has an outline proposal but is he still unsure of how to handle these matters? He may exercise all the powers and functions of the commissioners but does he intend that a civil servant will preside in open court and hear objections and adjudicate on claims, on vesting orders and the dissolution of trusts as has been the practice with the Land Commission? Will this be done behind closed doors or will the Minister set up a tribunal to deal with these matters. These are quasi-judicial matters and have been dealt with as such. It is important that we know the outline because farmers are asking this question. What is the outline? Who will look after these matters? Will it be someone such as a retired High Court judge? Will hearings take place in an open forum? What representation will people have? These are important questions, particularly as they relate to trusts, cow parks and such matters. They arise at local authority level and we need answers.

The Deputy is exaggerating the quasi-judicial nature of the issue. I dread to think that we will need another tribunal. However, I appreciate his concern for the retired legal profession. In 1994, the Attorney General decided that it was proper to transfer powers to a civil servant, either at assistant principal or higher executive officer grade. Civil servants will carry out the functions. The Deputy will appreciate that all such matters are much more open these days.

Top
Share