I propose to take Questions Nos. 4 to 8, inclusive, together.
Many of the areas in the Government's action programme for which my Department is responsible were subsequently reflected in the Programme for Prosperity and Fairness. As is clear from the latest PPF progress report and the progress report of July last on the Government's programme, which are both available in the Oireachtas Library, a considerable amount of the undertakings in both programmes have either been already delivered upon or are well on the way to being implemented.
The key areas for which my Department is responsible in terms of implementation can be broadly summarised as follows. Supporting the development and implementation of policy in a co-ordinated way across Departments, including servicing the activities of Cabinet committees in respect of Northern Ireland, European affairs, infrastructure and social inclusion; taking a lead role in respect of Civil Service modernisation, including regulatory reform; supports for the social partnership process, including the steering group on basic income; NESC and NESF, including national progress indicators and the action plan for the information society. They also include specific responsibilities in relation to Oireachtas reform, the re-establishment of the All-Party Committee on the Constitution, the review of the law offices and the implementation of the recommendations of the McCracken tribunal. I have reported to the House on all these areas in recent times and I do not think it would be the most efficient use of Question Time to repeat all the details here again.
Another area, however, for which my Department is responsible is the National Implementation Body which was established on foot of the 4 December 2000 agreed adjustment to the terms of the PPF. The purpose of the body is to ensure delivery of the stability and peace provisions of the PPF and, in that context, it obviously considers the potential implications for the PPF of any ongoing disputes of special national importance. However, responsibility for the resolution of disputes continues to rest primarily with the parties concerned and with the pre-existing industrial relations machinery of the State, as necessary.