Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 25 Jun 2002

Vol. 553 No. 5

Written Answers. - Criminal Assets Bureau.

Finian McGrath

Question:

345 Mr. F. McGrath asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the exact amount of money collected by the Criminal Assets Bureau over the past five years; and if he will consider using this money for youth and elderly people projects on the north side of Dublin. [14464/02]

The Criminal Assets Bureau presents a report on its activities annually through the Garda Commissioner. The most recent report is in respect of the year 2000. The reports to date, which cover in some detail the activities of the bureau, have been laid before each House of the Oireachtas. I am informed that, in accordance with the statutory provisions, the report for the year 2001 will be presented shortly.

Since its inception in 1996, the bureau has had significant success in meeting its statutory objectives. The bureau enforces the Proceeds of Crime Act, 1996, which provides a statutory procedure of restraint whereby applications can be made to the High Court to have specified property made the subject of restraint orders, and eventually realised for the benefit of the State.

I am informed by the Garda authorities that, up to the end of the year 2001, the bureau had obtained interim and "final" restraint orders to the value of more than €14 million and more than €11 million, respectively. In the same period, taxes and interest demanded were in excess of €56 million with more than €36 million collected. In addition, social welfare savings amount to more than €1.2 million.

In accordance with the safeguards of the Proceeds of Crime Act, 1996, a disposal order cannot be made in respect of property subject to a "final" restraint order until a period of seven years has elapsed. A proposal under examination is that assets which are determined by law to be the proceeds of crime be committed directly towards community regeneration, anti-drugs and other related programmes. While I see merit in the idea, it is not a proposal entirely free of difficulty. It involves a departure from the general rules applying to the management of fines and penalties recovered from those who breach the criminal law. The examination in question will consider those aspects in detail in addition to the legal and financial implications of any possible departure from existing Exchequer arrangements.
Top
Share