Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 28 May 2009

Vol. 683 No. 5

Written Answers.

The following are questions tabled by Members for written response and the ministerial replies as received on the day from the Departments [unrevised].
Questions Nos. 1 to 10, inclusive, answered orally.

Lisbon Treaty Referendum.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

11 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the extent to which he and his EU colleagues have engaged in the necessary discussions to address the issues arising from Ireland’s failure to ratify the Lisbon Treaty; the extent to which other EU member states are satisfied with any or all of the expected provisions required to meet the concerns as expressed by the Irish people after the defeated referendum; when he expects full and final agreement to be reached in these matters; if diplomatic initiatives or campaigns are expected to arise; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21803/09]

Last December the European Council agreed to a comprehensive package of measures to respond to the Irish people's concerns as outlined by the Taoiseach.

Specifically, the European Council agreed that, provided the Treaty of Lisbon enters into force, each Member State will continue to have the right to nominate a Commissioner. It also agreed that the necessary legal guarantees will be given to Ireland in the areas of taxation, defence and the provisions of the Constitution on the right to life, education and family. It further agreed that the high importance the EU attaches to social issues, including workers' rights, will be confirmed.

I am glad to have this opportunity to advise this House that detailed work is underway to give effect to these commitments. In accordance with the December European Council's Conclusions, it is intended that this work should be finalised at the June European Council.

If the Government is fully satisfied with the outcome of this work, we are committed to seeking ratification of the Treaty by the end of the term of the current Commission, which is expected to leave office at the end of October.

Our work is being taken forward at a number of different levels with our EU partners and with the EU institutions. Minister Martin and I have met a number of our colleagues to discuss this matter, most recently the Czech Minister for European Affairs, Štefan Füle, who was in Ireland on 14 May.

Our Partners continue to be extremely supportive of our efforts to secure an agreement that will provide necessary reassurance on the issues that arose during last year's referendum campaign. I anticipate that the Taoiseach and Minister Martin and I will need to engage further with our colleagues in the run-up to the June European Council. Throughout our discussions with the other Member States, we have been stressing the need for legally robust guarantees.

As the global economic and financial crisis has underscored, the European Union remains key to the promotion and protection of Ireland's national interests. The Government attaches utmost priority to ensuring that Ireland remains at the heart of the Union and it is our judgement that this requires that we deal with the concerns that arose last year and, on that basis, join with the other 26 Member States in ratifying the Lisbon Treaty.

Overseas Development Aid.

Joan Burton

Question:

12 Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs when it is proposed to establish a governance unit as proposed in the White Paper and in Irish Aid’s operational plan. [21833/09]

The White Paper on Irish Aid recommended the establishment of a Governance Unit tasked with ensuring that governance and corruption issues are taken into account across the work of the programme. I am happy to report that work is being completed on the development of Good Governance Guidelines which set out a framework to guide our overall approach to this area.

In line with the White Paper, the internal reorganisation of Irish Aid has now been completed to reflect the commitment to governance and corruption issues. Governance is an area to be mainstreamed across the aid programme. Responsibility for work on governance, as a mainstreamed area, is being shared across the various sections within Irish Aid. Specific focus is being given to this through a Governance Team comprising officers from a number of sections in Irish Aid. This Governance Team will also work closely with the Human Rights Unit and the Conflict Resolution Unit in the Department to develop programme strategies in the area of human rights and support to peace-building and post-conflict governance.

The Governance Team will oversee implementation of the approach and ensure coherence across the range of Irish Aid activities. It will provide a planning resource for Irish Aid as a whole in making choices and identifying priorities among possible governance interventions. It will monitor research, lessons-learned, evaluation and best practice on governance ensuring that this informs Irish Aid's actions, taking account of the linkages between good governance and the other cross-cutting issues.

At country level, locally-recruited governance advisors will continue to provide advice and support to the management team in implementing the programme.

Human Rights Issues.

Joe McHugh

Question:

13 Deputy Joe McHugh asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if he will report on the ongoing efforts at EU level to influence the situation in Burma, including the position of Aung San Suu Kyi; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21869/09]

Emmet Stagg

Question:

27 Deputy Emmet Stagg asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the position regarding the imprisonment of Aung San Suu Kyi; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21848/09]

Emmet Stagg

Question:

29 Deputy Emmet Stagg asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the position as it pertains in Burma. [21847/09]

Jim O'Keeffe

Question:

54 Deputy Jim O’Keeffe asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the steps he has taken arising from the latest behaviour of the military dictatorship in Burma towards the lawful leader Aung San Suu Kyi; and the further steps he will take on the matter. [21690/09]

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

139 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if he will report on this situation in Burma; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21986/09]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 13, 27, 29, 54 and 139 together.

The Minister deplores the arrest of Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, leader of the National League for Democracy in Burma and esteemed Nobel Peace laureate, her imprisonment in the notorious Insein Prison in Rangoon and the laying of charges and institution of court proceedings against her.

In a statement on 14 May, the Minister pointed out that her arrest represented the latest chapter in an ongoing effort to silence this courageous pro-democracy advocate and opposition leader. He noted also that her arrest and incarceration were particularly distressing given the very real concerns regarding her state of health. The Minister made clear his view that Aung San Suu Kyi and all political prisoners in Burma must be released and a process of dialogue and reconciliation initiated without delay.

The EU Presidency also issued a Declaration on 14 May, deeply regretting the arrest of Aung San Suu Kyi and strongly urging the Burmese authorities to release her. The Declaration called on the regime to engage in an inclusive process of national reconciliation, which is essential for setting Burma on a genuine path to stability and prosperity, and to initiate a new phase in the development of the country.

At the General Affairs and External Relations Council (GAERC) meeting on 22 April, EU Foreign Ministers agreed the renewal of the Common Position on restrictive measures on Burma for an additional year. Ministers also agreed to keep open the possibility of revising the Common Position in the light of developments on the ground. In this context, the situation in Burma was discussed again at the GAERC on 18 May and Ministers agreed that, following the arrest of Aung San Suu Kyi, the EU should look at new steps, including additional restrictive measures, which could be taken against the Burmese regime.

On 24 May, the EU-Troika met with the Burmese Minister of Foreign Affairs in the margin of the ASEM Ministerial meeting in Hanoi and conveyed the EU's demands for the release of Aung San Suu Kyi and other political prisoners directly to him.

There was also an opportunity at the ASEM Ministerial itself for Ireland and our EU partners to convey to the representatives of many of Burma's neighbours our very strong concerns and views about Aung San Suu Kyi and the situation in Burma more generally. The Chair‘s statement issued at the end of the meeting reflected these concerns. It was noteworthy that some of the Asian countries present made clear their own concerns about the treatment of Aung San Suu Kyi, in line with the strong statement made by Thailand in its role as ASEAN Chair on 19 May.

The EU-ASEAN Foreign Ministers' Meeting in Phnom Penh, which began yesterday, will offer further opportunities in this respect. We will be making clear to Burma's neighbours, individually and collectively, how important it is that they use their influence to put pressure on the Burmese regime, including in relation to the position of Aung San Suu Kyi, other political prisoners, the need for dialogue and the elections scheduled for 2010.

The Minister has repeatedly made clear the Government's view that the forthcoming elections in Burma will have no credibility unless all political prisoners are released unconditionally and a political process is initiated with the support of the United Nations on the basis of an inclusive, long-term dialogue in which the opposition and ethnic groups can participate fully. The Minister fully supports the role of the UN Secretary-General's Special Envoy, Dr Ibrahim Gambari, and the personal engagement of the UN Secretary-General himself. The Minister discussed the situation with the Secretary-General when they met in New York on 8 May and very much hopes that Secretary-General will be able to visit Burma shortly, as he plans, and to make concrete progress on the political and humanitarian agenda there.

The Minister welcomes the UN Security Council statement of 22 May expressing concern at the detention of Aung San Suu Kyi and calling for her release. This action by the Council is an important development, particularly given the difficulties in securing consensus on matters relating to Burma which have existed in the past. The Minister hopes the Council will remain seized of the issue and take further action as is necessary.

We will continue to work in the EU and UN frameworks and with the countries of the region to do all possible to advance our objectives in relation to Burma.

Overseas Development Aid.

John Deasy

Question:

14 Deputy John Deasy asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the way the reduction of €45 million in the amount of the overseas aid budget being allocated to the nine core programme countries in 2009 will be allocated to each of them; the programme areas within each of the countries that will be affected by these reductions; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21794/09]

The Government's aid programme, Irish Aid, provides assistance to over ninety developing countries. Nine have been designated as Programme Countries, with a commitment to long term strategic assistance. These are Tanzania, Zambia, Lesotho, Mozambique, Uganda, Ethiopia, Malawi, Vietnam and Timor Leste. In 2009, the total programme budget for these countries will amount to almost €200 million. Additional funding will be channelled through Irish Aid support for the development work of Non-Governmental Organisations, and in response to humanitarian emergencies. This level of funding underlines the Government's commitment to the central priority of the aid programme — to ensure an effective Irish contribution in the fight against global poverty and hunger, with a strong focus on the least developed countries, especially in sub-Saharan Africa.

I very much regret that it has been necessary to reduce the budget for overseas development assistance for 2009. The total aid budget this year will be €696 million, €571 million of which is administered under Vote 29 of the Department of Foreign Affairs. In implementing the necessary adjustments to the Irish Aid programme, we have worked hard to ensure that our strategic partnerships with developing countries are not undermined. Nonetheless, it has been necessary to adjust elements of our bilateral assistance to Programme Countries.

The original 2009 programme budget allocations for the nine priority countries have been adjusted as follows. The allocation of €33.84 million for Ethiopia has been revised to €27.84 million. The allocation of €12.92 million for Lesotho has been revised to €11.42 million. The allocation of €9.88 million for Malawi has been revised to €8.88 million. The allocation of €46.5 million for Mozambique has been revised to €40.5 million. The allocation of €37.5 million for Tanzania has been revised to €33.5 million. The allocation of €4.92 million for Timor Leste has been revised to €3.42 million. The allocation of €41 million for Uganda has been revised to €35.5 million. The allocation of €19.75 for Vietnam has been revised to €13.75 million. The allocation of €27.21 million for Zambia has been revised to €23.21 million.

These adjustments will be implemented in a manner which ensures the continued delivery of basic services such as health and education, and maintains the Irish Aid focus on the poorest and most vulnerable people and communities. I want to assure the Deputy that the continuity of our agreed development programmes will be maintained. It may now be necessary, however, to extend funding timeframes and modify disbursement rates in some cases.

The difficult decisions we have had to take in relation to the overall aid budget, and our bilateral assistance to the Programme Countries, have been based solely on the need to restore stability to the public finances and ensure a return to sustainable economic growth in Ireland. We have discussed the implementation of the adjustments with the Governments and organisations which are affected. We have also assured them of our clear commitment to resuming the expansion of the aid programme as soon as economic conditions allow.

Diplomatic Representation.

Charles Flanagan

Question:

15 Deputy Charles Flanagan asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the position in relation to the investigation into the death of a person (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21781/09]

At the outset, I would like to confirm that the Department is in ongoing contact with the family of the person mentioned by the Deputy and is liaising with them on all aspects of the case. The Department was represented at the funeral of the deceased.

As the Deputy will be aware, after hearing of the death of this Irish citizen, Minister Martin T.D. immediately instructed the Irish Embassy in Argentina, which is also accredited to Bolivia, to send a diplomatic officer to Bolivia to represent the Government and also to look after the interests of the family.

While in Bolivia, the Irish Embassy representative had meetings with the Bolivian Vice President, the Acting Minister for Foreign Affairs, the Vice Minister of the Interior, the Investigating Attorney in charge of the case, and the Investigating Officer from the Anti –Crime Special Force (FELCE).

The official expressed the Irish Government's concern at reports on the circumstances surrounding the death and enquired from the Bolivian authorities as to the steps they were taking to discover the facts of the case. The Irish Government representative also arranged for the repatriation of the body.

Minister Martin subsequently spoke by telephone to the Acting Foreign Minister and emphasised that the interest of the Irish Government in this case relates entirely to protecting the consular rights of our citizens abroad. He also emphasised that we have a duty to seek the facts in a case where one of our citizens was killed in a violent incident by the security forces in another country.

Minister Quintana assured Minister Martin that the Bolivian authorities wished to cooperate with the Irish Government to the fullest extent and advised that he would discuss the matter with President Morales. He further assured Minister Martin that the Bolivian authorities would take all necessary steps to collect all the evidence possible and that they would provide the Irish Government, through our Ambassador in Buenos Aires, with all reports, including copies of any interim findings.

A Parliamentary Commission with members drawn from both Government and Opposition members in Bolivia was established to inquire into this case. The Commission has yet to report.

Our Ambassador in Buenos Aires has formally requested copies of the post-mortem and ballistics reports and any interim investigation reports. She recently met with her Bolivian counterpart and reiterated the importance attached to receiving these as soon as possible.

Minister Martin also confirmed to the Acting Foreign Minister that the Irish Government would welcome the establishment of an international panel of investigation and that we are ready to assist and cooperate with such a panel, if the Bolivian Government decided to take this course.

I can assure the Deputy that the Government will continue to seek clarification from the Bolivian authorities of the precise circumstances of the death of the citizen concerned. The Consular Section of the Department Affairs will remain in direct contact with the family of the deceased and will continue to provide them with all possible consular assistance.

Human Rights Issues.

Ciaran Lynch

Question:

16 Deputy Ciarán Lynch asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the recent contact he has had with the Ambassador of Iran in relation to the incarceration of members of the Baha’i faith and the form of the charges against them. [21820/09]

Jack Wall

Question:

41 Deputy Jack Wall asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the position regarding the Baha’is in Iran. [21843/09]

Jack Wall

Question:

60 Deputy Jack Wall asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the position regarding the trial of Baha’i leadership in Iran which in February 2009 was accused of espionage. [21846/09]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 16, 41 and 60 together.

The situation of members of the minority Baha'i faith in Iran has long been a matter of serious concern to the Government and to members of the Oireachtas. In recent years, there has been a progressive increase in harassment of individual Baha'is, and worrying indications that these are part of a concerted effort by the Iranian authorities to destroy the Baha'i faith and community as a whole. Reports suggest that up to 37 Baha'i are imprisoned in Iran at present, many without trial.

Particular concern has arisen in relation to a group of seven Baha'i community leaders, five men and two women, who were detained, one in March and the others in May 2008, and held for almost a year without any formal charge. During this period, outside contacts have been restricted to a family visit of ten minutes approximately once per month. We understand that these seven people constitute an informal leadership group, attempting to maintain links among the Baha'i communities throughout Iran. Their arrest gives rise to particular concern because of the fate of the previous Baha'i leadership, who in 1980 in the early days of the Islamic Republic were arrested and never seen again. The successor leadership were also arrested in 1981 and executed.

The seven Baha'i currently in custody have now been charged with a number of offences, including running an illegal organisation, anti-regime propaganda, insulting religious values, and espionage on behalf of Israel. These are obviously very serious charges, which could lead to the application of the death penalty, and the basis for which must be seriously questioned. Concerns are heightened by the fact that the lawyers for the accused have been unable to see them at all, have been denied access to the case files, and have themselves been subject to public criticism and harassment. There seems very little prospect of even a semblance of a fair trial in these circumstances. In addition, no trial date has been set and the detainees have never been to court to hear the charges against them. More recently, the espionage charge has been dropped and a charge of "spreading corruption on earth" has been added. Worryingly, this new charge also attracts the death penalty in Iran.

The Minister for Foreign Affairs has directly raised his concerns regarding the treatment of the Baha'i with members of the Iranian Government, including with Foreign Minister Mottaki at the United Nations General Assembly in September 2008. In December 2008, Minister Martin wrote to Foreign Minister Mottaki on human rights concerns in general, and raised the issue of the Baha'i and the case of these seven representatives in particular. In his letter, the Minister stated that: "It is difficult in these circumstances to avoid the conclusion that the Government and authorities of Iran are actively trying to suppress a religious faith." Last month the Minister received a lengthy response from Foreign Minister Mottaki, which he and his officials have studied closely. However, Foreign Minister Mottaki's reply would not appear to go beyond previous statements by the Iranian authorities on human rights issues or provide the necessary assurances in relation to the specific treatment of these seven detained Baha'i.

The European Union has repeatedly drawn attention to the oppression perpetrated against the Baha'i faith and its members by the Islamic Republic of Iran. In February, the EU issued a statement expressing its deep concern that, after being held for so long without due process, the Baha'i leaders may not receive a fair trial and requesting Iran to allow independent observation of the judicial proceedings and to reconsider the charges brought against these individuals. A further EU Declaration, fully supported by Ireland, on the increasing violation of religious freedom in Iran, issued on 25 May. This reiterated concerns about the continued detention without trial of the seven Baha'i leaders and called on the Iranian authorities to uphold their international legal undertakings to safeguard religious freedom and stop their persecution of legitimate religious activities.

Officers of the Department of Foreign Affairs met with the Iranian Ambassador to Ireland at the end of February to restate our strong concerns in relation to human rights in Iran and the treatment of the Baha'i. Officials in the Department also meet regularly with senior representatives of the Baha'i community here, most recently earlier this month. I would like to assure the Deputy that the Government, both directly through our Embassy in Tehran and in cooperation with our EU partners, will continue to monitor this particular case closely and we will not hesitate to bring our views to the notice of the Iranian authorities.

Shane McEntee

Question:

17 Deputy Shane McEntee asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs his position with respect to the issue of Armenia’s claim of genocide by Turkey in 1917; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21779/09]

I would direct the Deputy to the Minister's reply on this matter on 12 May. In that reply, the Minister noted that the events which resulted in the tragic deaths of very large numbers of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire more than ninety years ago continue to be interpreted very differently in Turkey and Armenia. However, the Minister also emphasised that last month's announcement of a roadmap for the normalisation of relations between Armenia and Turkey was a positive step for the two countries' relations, which will hopefully lead to the opening of diplomatic relations and of the common border between the two countries.

As the Minister mentioned then, official details of the roadmap have not yet been made public, but it appears likely that it will include a mechanism to allow for a joint study of the period and an investigation of claims relating to Armenian deaths. This will hopefully lead to an agreed interpretation of those tragic events. I believe that, in recognising the sensitivity of the issues involved, we should support these recent positive efforts between the two countries to address all outstanding issues, including historical ones.

Overseas Development Aid.

Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin

Question:

18 Deputy Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs his views on the assessment of a person (details supplied) that cuts in Irish overseas aid spending were proportionately more severe than in any other country; if he will make an explicit recommitment that Ireland will reach its target of 0.6% by 2010 and 0.7% by 2012 including a timetable for the reinstatement and increase of funding. [21707/09]

Noel Coonan

Question:

20 Deputy Noel J. Coonan asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if he plans to meet the Government’s stated target of spending 0.6% of GNP on the overseas aid budget in 2010; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21796/09]

Willie Penrose

Question:

24 Deputy Willie Penrose asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs his views on whether he will achieve his commitment to 0.7%, its UN target, by 2012. [21842/09]

Ciaran Lynch

Question:

28 Deputy Ciarán Lynch asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the position regarding the Irish Aid programme; the cuts which have been made to the programme on foot of budgetary cutbacks; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21821/09]

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Question:

46 Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if he will introduce legislation to make sure that Ireland honours its promise to spend 0.7% of national income on overseas aid; and if so, when he will do so. [21706/09]

Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin

Question:

57 Deputy Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the implications of the decision to cut overseas aid spending by €45 million in July 2008 by €15 million in October 2008, by €95 million in February 2009 and by an additional €100 million in the supplementary Budget of 7 April 2009 for the world’s poorest; and his views on the assessment of a group (details supplied) that Ireland will miss its own overseas aid target of 0.6% by 2010. [21708/09]

Mary Upton

Question:

62 Deputy Mary Upton asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the percentage of GNP that will be devoted to overseas development aid for the year 2009; the projected percentage by the end of 2010, 2011 and 2012; and when the 0.7% level, to which Ireland has agreed on several different occasions, will be reached. [21824/09]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 18, 20, 24, 28, 46, 57 and 62 together.

The total Official Development Assistance (ODA) budget for 2009 will be €696 million. €571 million will be administered by the Department of Foreign Affairs, through Irish Aid, with the balance of €125 million being contributions to development co-operation by other Government Departments and through Ireland's allocation to the EU Development Cooperation Budget.

On current projections, this level of funding will represent approximately 0.48% of estimated 2009 Gross National Product (GNP), and should maintain Ireland's position as one of the world's most generous donors on a per capita basis. This remains an enormous achievement, particularly so in the current economic circumstances and one that we should all be pleased to acknowledge.

As the Deputy is aware, the Government has had to make the regrettable but necessary decision to reduce the 2009 development assistance programme by €195 million. This decision was taken solely in the context of the economic situation facing the country. The reduction is one of a series of measures designed to restore the public finances and establish a solid platform for renewed economic growth.

While the cut in the ODA allocation for 2009 is significant, it follows a period of unprecedented growth in ODA volumes. In 1999, for instance, total ODA was just over €230 million. The allocation of €696 million for 2009 represents a trebling in the volume of ODA delivered over the last 10 years. This is an achievement of which all Irish people should be proud.

Nonetheless, both the Government and I are acutely aware that those cuts will have implications for our aid programme — a programme which is renowned internationally for its clear focus on poverty reduction and hunger alleviation, and for its concentration on the least developed countries, especially in sub-Saharan Africa. I am determined that we will maintain this focus and that we will continue to work closely with our partners in pursuit of our shared goals of reducing poverty in line with the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs).

We also recognise that the decision to reduce the ODA budget for 2009 will make it somewhat more difficult to achieve the target of spending 0.7% of GNP on ODA by 2012. However, we will continue to work towards meeting this goal and a full assessment of our capacity to achieve the target will be made in the context of preparing the 2010 Budget.

I think it is also important not to lose sight of Ireland's tremendous progress towards reaching this UN target. At the start of this decade, Ireland contributed 0.3% of GNP to ODA. Last year we contributed 0.58% — almost doubling our GNP percentage expenditure in the intervening period. This level of spending has made us the sixth most generous donor in the world on a per capita basis and well ahead of most of our EU partners in efforts to achieve the EU target of 0.7% of GNP by 2015. Notwithstanding the reduction in the 2009 allocation, Ireland should, in all likelihood, maintain this ranking within the OECD donor countries.

Our aid programme has just been reviewed by the OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC). The OECD DAC is the pre-eminent international body in relation to benchmarking donors such as Ireland against aid quality. This key report, published this month, states that "Ireland is a champion in making aid more effective" and that "Irish Aid is a strong cutting edge development programme". These are the views of an independent, objective and critical international aid organisation from which we can draw pride. The Government will be working to ensure that these high standards are maintained.

Our aid programme remains one of the best in the world. It reflects our core values and commitments to supporting the poorest people in the world. The decisions that we have taken regarding adjustments to the aid programme were framed in the context of this commitment and our determination that, once the Irish economy has returned to a pattern of sustainable growth, we will resume the expansion of our aid programme.

Human Rights Issues.

Paul Connaughton

Question:

19 Deputy Paul Connaughton asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if he will contact the US administration to offer his support in its efforts to close Guantanamo Bay; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21866/09]

As the Deputy will be aware, the Government has welcomed the Executive Order issued by President Obama on 22 January announcing that the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay should close within one year.

The Minister had a useful discussion with Secretary of State Clinton on the issue when they met over the St Patrick's Day period. At that meeting, he reiterated that we had long called for the closure of the facility at Guantanamo Bay and that we would wish to be helpful in facilitating its closure. This position was subsequently confirmed by the Taoiseach when he indicated that it is incumbent on those who called for the closure of the Guantanamo detention centre to assist the United States in ensuring that certain prisoners be relocated elsewhere and expressed Ireland's readiness to take a small, proportionate number of detainees.

Discussions are ongoing within the EU on a common approach to the various practical and legal issues which arise in the resettlement of former detainees in EU Member States. Contacts have taken place with the US at both EU and national level.

While the question of whether EU Member States might accept former detainees remains a national decision, the Member States are agreed that the EU-level discussions with the United States Administration on this matter should be allowed to take their course.

Question No. 20 answered with Question No. 18.

Overseas Development Aid.

Liz McManus

Question:

21 Deputy Liz McManus asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the action he proposes to take to implement the Accra Agenda for Action. [21836/09]

I was delighted to have the opportunity to attend the Accra High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness in September 2008, where I was able to contribute to the EU Ministerial discussions on the Accra Agenda for Action.

The High Level Forum and the Accra Agenda for Action have been effective in drawing renewed attention to the importance of improving aid delivery and giving value for money, especially at a time of a world economic downturn.

The Accra Agenda for Action highlights three areas where further progress needs to be made by both partner countries and donors. These are: i) strengthening country ownership over development, ii) building more effective and inclusive partnerships and iii) delivering and accounting for better results on the ground.

In response, Irish Aid has developed a Plan of Action to implement commitments under the Accra Agenda for Action. The plan identifies actions Irish Aid will take to implement the Accra agenda. Many of the actions are already underway.

New guidelines on aid effectiveness and training are being rolled out for staff at HQ and field level. We have developed a results based management approach to country assistance programming. Irish Aid is working with other donors to strengthen partner countries' results frameworks and we are increasingly linking our contributions to development outcomes agreed with partner countries and the donor community.

Framework agreements with our multilateral partners, such as the UN system, allow for strengthened monitoring and evaluation with a strong focus on impact. Irish Aid is also working with Dóchas, the NGO umbrella organisation, on how to apply the aid effectiveness principles from the NGO perspective.

The OECD DAC Peer Review of Ireland, published last month, congratulated Ireland on the high level of commitment to aid effectiveness and for embedding aid effectiveness in Irish Aid's systems.

The Accra Action Plan will be monitored closely and updated annually during the business planning process. It will ensure we now build on this excellent international reputation and continue to improve the effectiveness of our aid.

International Agreements.

Joanna Tuffy

Question:

22 Deputy Joanna Tuffy asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the ongoing consultation between the EU and countries in Africa, the Caribbean and the Pacific with regard to economic partnership agreements in view of his recent attendance at a meeting which demonstrated the damaging effects of proposed EPA’s on ACP countries; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21825/09]

Ireland has taken a consistently strong position within the EU on the complex range of issues involved in the negotiation of Economic Partnership Agreements with the African Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) group of countries. The negotiations are carried out by the European Commission, on behalf of the EU. Ireland has been one of a group of Member States which has ensured that the negotiations are followed closely, at political level, by the Member States.

These Agreements cover both trade and development issues. They are needed as a result of the decision by the World Trade Organisation (WTO) that the EU's longstanding unilateral trade preferences for ACP countries established unfair discrimination between developing countries. The Cotonou Agreement of 2000 provided for the negotiation of new Agreements with ACP States, which would be acceptable to the WTO. On this basis, the WTO agreed in 2001 to grant a waiver to the EU to continue unilateral preferences until January 2008.

As the Deputy will be aware, the negotiating process has been a difficult one. By the time of the January 2008 deadline, only one of the ACP regional groupings, representing fifteen countries of the Caribbean region, had initialled and signed a full Agreement with the EU. A further 21 ACP countries initialled interim Economic Partnership Agreements. The interim Agreement with Ghana, Ivory Coast and Cameroon has been signed by the European Commission and the Member States. The Agreement was signed by Ireland on 18 December 2008, following Dáil approval. There has also been progress on the Agreement with five of the countries of the Southern Africa Regional Development Community (SADC), which are expected to sign in the coming weeks. Negotiations with the remaining ACP countries are continuing, with a view to signature of interim Agreements during 2009.

In view of the interest in the Agreements which has been expressed on all sides of the House, I was very pleased to attend the recent meeting on the issues involved, which was organised by the Irish Section of the Association of European Parliamentarians for Africa (AWEPA). I took full account of the views expressed when I joined with a number of Ministers from other Member States in requesting that progress on the issue of Economic Partnership Agreements be reviewed at the meeting of the EU Development Council, which I attended in Brussels on 18 and 19 May. At the Council, which was attended by the EU Trade Commissioner, Baroness Ashton, I stressed the need to ensure the maximum degree of flexibility in these negotiations which is permissible under World Trade Organisation rules.

Ireland has consistently maintained the position that the objective must be to finalise Agreements which are supportive of the development needs of the ACP countries, and of their poverty reduction policies and programmes. I can assure the Deputy that we will continue to take a strong position, in order to ensure that a genuine partnership approach is maintained in the continuing negotiations between the Commission and its ACP counterparts.

Overseas Development Aid.

Mary Upton

Question:

23 Deputy Mary Upton asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the reason for the discrepancy between his Minister of State’s recent appearance on RTÉ when he stated that since the Irish Aid programme focused on short-term emergency humanitarian aid, that there was no reduction in this, and the statement, later, by his Department that such funding had been reduced by 70%; the implications this has for the Irish Aid programme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21823/09]

Eamon Gilmore

Question:

67 Deputy Eamon Gilmore asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the position in relation to the emergency response fund to human disasters and to the humanitarian relief fund. [21829/09]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 23 and 67 together.

I welcome this opportunity to clear up any misconceptions about emergency funding through the Government's official overseas development programme, Irish Aid. Emergency response by Irish Aid is provided by way of the Emergency Humanitarian Assistance Fund (EHAF). The revised budgetary figure for EHAF is €56 million for 2009. This is a reduction of 30% and the new figure therefore amounts to 70% of the original figure of €80 million budgeted for spending under EHAF in 2009.

Emergency funding increased sharply in 2005 in the aftermath of the Tsunami. Following this adjustment in the 2009 budget, emergency funding is now in balance with the overall spend on Development Cooperation and now accounts for approximately 8% of total Irish Aid spending, a figure which is in accord with the average spent by all OECD countries.

Spending will be allocated throughout the full range of our established partnerships which include UN agencies, the Red Cross family and humanitarian NGOs.

In addition to EHAF, support for emergency responses is also available through a number of other Irish Aid funding channels. Irish Aid has a separate fund for Emergency Preparedness and Post Emergency Recovery (EPPR); there is the innovative Rapid Response Initiative which provides access to emergency humanitarian supplies at short notice as well as the Rapid Response Corps which makes humanitarian volunteers available to our partner agencies to assist in a response. Furthermore, our Programme Countries also provide emergency funding from time to time. In 2008, the Ethiopia Country Programme made funding available for an emergency response to the drought in that country.

In addition to our bilateral response we should not forget that the European Union also responds to emergencies on our behalf. Through its Humanitarian Aid Office (ECHO) the EU provides hundreds of millions of Euro to humanitarian emergencies every year.

Question No. 24 answered with Question No. 18.

Diplomatic Representation.

Pat Rabbitte

Question:

25 Deputy Pat Rabbitte asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs his views on the re-establishment of an Irish embassy in Nairobi, Kenya. [21817/09]

Bernard Allen

Question:

33 Deputy Bernard Allen asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the position in relation to establishing an embassy in Nairobi, Kenya; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21790/09]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 25 and 33 together.

Ireland has a relatively small Diplomatic Service, operating on limited resources. While the opening of resident diplomatic missions abroad, including in Kenya, is considered by the Government on an ongoing basis, any expansion of our diplomatic network can, as I am sure the Deputy will appreciate, only be undertaken having regard to clear priorities and available resources. In sub-Saharan Africa, most of our Missions are located in countries where we operate a priority bilateral aid programme.

Ireland has enjoyed full diplomatic relations with Kenya since 1974. While a resident Irish Embassy was established in Nairobi in 1977, it was with great regret that we found ourselves having to close our Embassy in Kenya in 1988 due to severe budgetary constraints at the time.

The current position is that the Ambassador of Ireland in Tanzania, Ms. Anne Barrington, is also accredited to Kenya on a non-resident basis and there are no plans at present to change this arrangement. Ireland's Honorary Consul in Nairobi, Mr Joseph O'Brien, continues to provide an excellent service to our citizens who live in or visit Kenya.

The lack of resident diplomatic Mission does not diminish the importance we attach to our relations with Kenya. An example of the close engagement Ireland has in support of peace and stability in Kenya was seen following the disputed December 2007 elections and the ensuing violence. Ireland provided significant financial support for the successful efforts of former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan to broker a peace deal. On foot of this agreement, a Government of National Unity was formed, and the then-Minister for Foreign Affairs, Dermot Ahern T.D., visited Kenya in April 2008 to demonstrate Ireland's support for the peace agreement and to encourage its full implementation.

Foreign Conflicts.

Martin Ferris

Question:

26 Deputy Martin Ferris asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the initiatives that he and the EU will undertake in response to the massacre of thousands of Tamil civilians by the Sri Lankan government. [21712/09]

Paul Connaughton

Question:

58 Deputy Paul Connaughton asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the position in relation to the situation in Sri Lanka; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21789/09]

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

148 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if he will report on the emerging situation in Sri Lanka with particular reference to the need to eliminate human rights abuses and restoration of democracy; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21995/09]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 26, 58 and 148 together.

As stated in response to the Priority Question today, I remain deeply concerned about the situation in Sri Lanka and in particular about the grave humanitarian crisis taking place there.

I fully endorse the conclusions of the EU General Affairs and External Relations Council (GAERC) held on 18 May 2009, which stated that "the EU . . . . . is appalled by the loss of innocent lives as a result of the conflict and by the high number of casualties, including children, following recent intense fighting".

I am also deeply disturbed by the reports of serious breaches of international humanitarian law by both sides in the conflict and I am firmly of the view that these must be subject to independent review. A Special Session of the UN Human Rights Council on the situation of human rights in Sri Lanka took place in Geneva on Tuesday and Wednesday. Ireland made a national statement at this Special Session. I very much regret that efforts by the EU and others to initiate an inquiry into breaches of international law during the recent fighting were resisted by a majority of Council members.

The immediate priority now must be to ensure the safety and welfare of all displaced civilians. This is going to be an enormous undertaking as there are already over 200,000 requiring assistance and at least 50,000 more who are expected to seek it in the coming days. The Government of Sri Lanka must fulfil its obligations under international law to protect all people under its jurisdiction. Camps in which displaced people are being assisted must be transferred from army to civilian control, entry to and departure from them must be strictly voluntary, and the camps must be temporary. Humanitarian agencies and independent observers must be given full access to these areas and the people in them.

The second priority is to get a post-conflict strategy underway without delay. This will need to focus on reconstruction, economic and social development, and the restoration of basic services in the Tamil North. Hopefully, plans can be agreed with the Government to enable a comprehensive programme to be mounted.

Thirdly, an inclusive reconciliation and peace process must be initiated. It will be essential that arrangements and mechanisms are in place to ensure the representation of the Tamil population and facilitate dialogue, negotiation and reconciliation. I welcome President Rajapakse's stated intention to pursue a negotiated settlement with the Tamil community and very much hope that this can begin at an early date. Key to a successful process and sustainable peace will be political dialogue based on the principles of parity of esteem, consent, equality and the rule of law.

It will be important that the international community is involved in the peace process. International experience, expertise and support will be invaluable in terms of guiding the process, keeping it on track and serving as an independent facilitator. As I have stated in this House on a number of occasions, should the relevant parties there seek our advice in relation to the peace process, we would be happy to give consideration as to how we could best help.

Ireland would welcome further action by the international community, in particular by the UN Secretary-General and the UN Security Council, to assist in this process. In this context, I am delighted that the Secretary-General visited Sri Lanka on 22-23 May. I welcome the emphasis he placed during his visit on the importance of making progress on meeting urgent humanitarian needs, on the fast-tracking of IDP screening processes, and on the initiation by the Government and other parties of a political process of dialogue, accommodation and reconciliation.

The EU has been extremely active in relation to Sri Lanka. As I have indicated above, Sri Lanka was discussed at the General Affairs and External Relations Council (GAERC) on 18 May and comprehensive conclusions were issued. An EU Ministerial Troika visited the country on 12-13 May. The EU has decided to allocate €3 million from its humanitarian response budget to address the needs of all the people affected by the conflict.

In view of the serious humanitarian crisis in the affected areas, Irish Aid is now providing funding of €308,000 for an emergency response through NGO partners, to include emergency medical and nutrition support, the provision of shelter, and distribution of food and non-food items. In addition, a member of Irish Aid's Rapid Response Corps has been deployed to Sri Lanka to assist in the emergency response effort of the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR).

Question No. 27 answered with Question No. 13.
Question No. 28 answered with Question No. 18.
Question No. 29 answered with Question No. 13.

Good Friday Agreement.

Damien English

Question:

30 Deputy Damien English asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the position in respect of funding for North-South bodies under the Good Friday Agreement which come under his responsibility; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21765/09]

Arising from the Good Friday Agreement of 1998, six North-South Implementation Bodies and Tourism Ireland were established. These play a significant role in taking forward North-South co-operation on the island.

The North-South Bodies are jointly funded by the Government and the Northern Ireland Executive. Funding from each jurisdiction is provided on an agreed proportionate basis having regard to the benefits accruing to each jurisdiction and the specific factors related to each Body. The funding of the individual Bodies is a matter for the responsible Departments, North and South, in each case. My Department does not fund any of the North-South Bodies.

Total funding for the Bodies from both jurisdictions in 2008 amounted to some €187 million. Total Government funding for the Bodies in 2008 was €129 million. The budgets of the North-South Bodies for 2009 are under consideration by the sponsor Departments of the Bodies and the Department of Finance, together with their Northern counterparts, with a view to agreement within the North-South Ministerial Council. In that connection, the Department of Finance is working with the Northern Ireland Department of Finance and Personnel on an agreed approach on identifying savings in the budgets of the North-South Bodies in the coming year.

The North-South Implementation Bodies and Tourism Ireland remain an important component of the overall institutional architecture on this island arising from the Good Friday Agreement. They are unique, cross-jurisdictional entities which operate on an all-island basis under the overall direction of the North-South Ministerial Council. Since the re-establishment of the power-sharing institutions in 2007, the relevant Ministers have had a range of useful and productive meetings in relation to the Bodies with their Northern counterparts within the framework of the North-South Ministerial Council. The full and continuing effectiveness of the North-South Bodies remains a high priority for the Government.

Human Rights Issues.

Arthur Morgan

Question:

31 Deputy Arthur Morgan asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the steps Ireland and the EU are taking to ensure that medical and food aid and reconstruction materials enter and reach those who need them in Gaza. [21710/09]

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

143 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the action taken at EU and UN level to improve the situation in the Middle East with particular reference to the alleviation of hardship, human rights abuses, starvation and oppression in Gaza; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21990/09]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 31 and 143 together.

There is no doubt that the current volume of aid passing into Gaza is insufficient. The UN continues to report on shortages of basic humanitarian supplies and the number of daily truckloads of goods permitted into Gaza actually declined in April by 20%. While Israel is now allowing in some previously blocked items, such as paper for school books, overall quantities of aid have decreased and remain at the same inadequate levels as before the Israeli offensive in December and January. As a result, the humanitarian situation remains very precarious and the reconstruction process has yet to get truly under way.

Fundamentally, the situation can only be reversed by an immediate and unconditional reopening of the Territory's crossings points for both humanitarian and commercial goods. This is a point that both I and EU colleagues have made repeatedly to the Israeli authorities. Earlier this month, the EU Presidency, the European Commission and High Representative Javier Solana sent a joint letter to the Israeli Foreign Minister calling again for the opening of the crossing points and the unimpeded provision and distribution of humanitarian assistance to Gaza.

While the humanitarian situation is deeply troubling, I am especially concerned by the lack of progress with regard to the reconstruction of the Territory. It is now over four months since the unilateral ceasefires were put in place yet much of Gaza still lies in ruins. Israeli restrictions on the entry of construction materials into Gaza have not only prevented the repair of damaged homes but also the rebuilding of shattered infrastructure. As a result, thousands of Palestinians made homeless by the conflict remain living in tents and temporary shelters while there are also ongoing crippling shortages of clean water and electricity.

The priority remains to focus our efforts not just on the serious humanitarian situation — as pressing as that may be — but also on the longer term economic recovery of Gaza as well as support for efforts to promote Palestinian reconciliation. People in Gaza must be offered an economic and political future. The EU is firmly committed to achieving this goal. It is already the largest donor to the Palestinian people and in 2009 the Commission alone will provide over €554 million in financial assistance. The EU has consistently called for the reopening of Gaza's borders to aid the recovery process and is also prepared to reactivate and possibly extend its assistance in the management of the Territory's borders. The EU will also continue to support the development of the broader Palestinian economy, addressing the needs of the West Bank as well as Gaza, since both territories constitute the pillars of a future Palestinian State.

At a national level, total Irish aid funding to the Palestinian people in 2008 amounted to over €8.6 million which included €3.8 million in core support to the UN Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), and €3 million for the Palestinian Authority, of which €1.5 million was for the purchase of fuel for the power plant in Gaza. Support was also provided to a range of civil society organisations for human rights and democratisation initiatives.

In 2009, while maintaining our core support for UNRWA, we have already provided an additional €1.5 million in special emergency funding to address the humanitarian consequences of the crisis in Gaza. Further funding allocations to the Palestinian people will be determined as the year progresses.

Middle East Peace Process.

James Bannon

Question:

32 Deputy James Bannon asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the contacts he has had with the Israeli Prime Minister Mr. Netanyahu; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21785/09]

My reply to Questions Nos. 1 and 4 have set out the importance I attach to making every effort to support and encourage the Middle East Peace Process.

I have not yet had any contact with Prime Minister Netanyahu, who in his short period since taking office has been constructing a budget and carrying out a comprehensive review of policy on the peace process. However, we remain, of course, in close and regular contact with the Israeli authorities through regular diplomatic channels.

Some of the statements and policies ascribed to Mr. Netanyahu and his new coalition partners are matters of concern. However, his Government has yet to set out its intentions following its internal review and his recent meeting with President Obama, and he has professed his commitment to making peace with Israel's Palestinian neighbours. I hope that he will be able to provide the courageous and imaginative leadership which Israel needs at this time.

Question No. 33 answered with Question No. 25.

Territorial Waters.

Paul Kehoe

Question:

34 Deputy Paul Kehoe asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the position in relation to Ireland’s submission claiming an extension of the continental shelf under the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21793/09]

The regime governing the exploration and exploitation of the continental shelf in international law is set down by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 1982. Under that convention a coastal state is entitled to a continental shelf 200 nautical miles (approximately 370 km) in breadth regardless of whether its continental shelf physically extends that far, subject only to the similar rights of its coastal neighbours. It may also claim a broader shelf where it can show that the natural prolongation of its land territory under water actually extends beyond that limit. A claim to extended shelf must be supported by scientific and technical data and be established to the satisfaction of the UN Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf, which was created by the convention for this purpose. Ireland's shelf naturally extends beyond 200 nautical miles both to the west and to the south of the country. For the purposes of our claims we have divided the extended shelf into three sectors.

The first sector is to the south-west of the country on the edge of an area known as the Porcupine Abyssal Plain. This sector (which is approximately half the size of the State's land territory) is not disputed by any other state and was therefore the subject of Ireland's first submission to the Commission, made in May 2005. Having considered this submission, in April 2007 the Commission issued its recommendations. These confirmed Ireland's entitlement to extend our continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles in this sector and set out details of where the outer limit of the shelf should be established there. The recommendations permit Ireland to designate extended shelf of approximately 39,000 square kilometres in area.

This is a very satisfactory outcome and, accordingly, on 31 March last the Government made an Order under section 2 of the Continental Shelf Act 1968 which designates the additional seabed enclosed by the recommended limits as an area to which the 1968 Act applies. The Order has been laid before both Houses of the Oireachtas in accordance with section 14 of the Act. The effect of the Order is formally to establish the area concerned as Irish continental shelf.

The second sector of claimed extended continental shelf is in the Celtic Sea and the Bay of Biscay, where there are unresolved boundary issues with the UK, France and Spain. This sector was the subject of a joint submission made by the four countries in May 2006. It covers an area of approximately 80,000 square kilometres, which is slightly larger than the State's land territory.

The joint submission was examined by a subcommission established to consider the evidence submitted in support of it. The four states met with the subcommission on a number of occasions, following which it formulated draft recommendations on the entitlement of the four to extend the continental shelf in this sector and setting out details of where the outer limit should be established there. These recommendations were transmitted to the full Commission, which in turn adopted them on 24 March last. The recommendations are now under examination by the four states concerned, after which the question of division of the area between them will also be addressed.

Ireland also claims continental shelf in the part of the North-East Atlantic Ocean known as the Hatton-Rockall Area, which extends up to 500 nautical miles from the coast. Ireland and the UK agreed a maritime boundary on the continental shelf here in 1988 but this is not accepted by Iceland or Denmark, which is acting on behalf of the Færoe Islands, both of which also make extensive overlapping claims. The UN Commission's rules of procedure prevent its consideration of a submission concerning an area of disputed continental shelf without the consent of the states concerned. The four have met regularly since 2001 (most recently in London before Christmas) but have so far failed to reach an agreement that would allow the Commission to consider a submission on the area concerned.

In view of this, and in consideration of the 12 May 2009 deadline for the making of submissions that applied to Ireland, the Government authorised the making of a national submission to the Commission in respect of the Hatton-Rockall Area. This submission was lodged with the Commission in New York on 31 March. While the Commission's rules of procedure prevent its consideration without the consent of all the states concerned, submission at this time does preserve Ireland's legal position. In the meantime, the four states intend to keep the matter under regular review and we will continue to work for the creation of conditions that will permit consideration of the submission by the Commission as soon as possible.

Diplomatic Representation.

Ulick Burke

Question:

35 Deputy Ulick Burke asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the reason he is closing down Ireland’s consulate in Wales; if this will adversely affect relations with Wales; if there are plans to close further consulates; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21867/09]

It was with regret that I recently informed the Right Honourable, Rhodri Morgan A.M., First Minister of Wales, of the decision to close our Consulate General in Cardiff.

While the closing of the office will means that we no longer have a full time representative based in Wales, I am determined that this necessary but regrettable action will not adversely affect Ireland's close relations with Wales and with the Welsh Assembly.

I assured the First Minister that this decision should in no way be construed as a downgrading of our relationship with Wales or with the Welsh Assembly. The Government is determined that the close co-operation between the two administrations will continue to be developed, bilaterally and through the British Irish Council. I am confident that Ireland's bilateral relationship with Wales can be fully sustained and promoted through the Irish Embassy in London and I have asked our Ambassador there to allocate the necessary resources to ensure this.

Ireland has a small diplomatic service, operating with limited resources. The significant budgetary pressures currently being faced by my Department, as for all Government Departments, means that difficult decisions are required. The decision to close the Consulate General in Cardiff was taken in this context. There are no plans currently to close further Consulates.

In the Government's "Smart Economy" document, published at the end of 2008, my Department committed to reviewing its network of missions abroad in order to ensure that they are operating at an optimum level of efficiency, are delivering tangible services and outcomes for the benefit of Ireland and its citizens, and that resources are aligned with our strategic objectives.

Foreign Conflicts.

John Perry

Question:

36 Deputy John Perry asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs his views on Zimbabwe; if the international community is positive about the formation of a unity government; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21868/09]

The formation of a unity government in Zimbabwe in February was far from being a solution to Zimbabwe's problems, but was nonetheless a sign of some limited progress in the political process. Three months on, there have been some improvements in the situation on the ground in Zimbabwe, notably in curbing hyperinflation and adopting the South African rand as the reference currency. However, the political situation remains very fragile, and I am gravely concerned by reports of continuing human rights violations, arbitrary arrests, torture of prisoners and abuse of the rule of law. The lack of real progress on many issues vital to Zimbabwe's recovery and the failure to reform media laws to allow for meaningful press freedom are causes of ongoing concern.

Among the many challenges facing the unity government is the continued failure of President Mugabe to address the issue of senior government appointments in a manner consistent with the September 2008 power-sharing agreement. Most notably, the retention of Gideon Gono as Governor of the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe is detrimental to the interests of the country. The removal of Gono, whose abject mismanagement of the economy is blamed for Zimbabwe's collapse into financial ruin, is vital to build confidence among donors and among the international investors which Zimbabwe will need to contribute to its economic recovery.

The international community has stated its willingness to support the economic and social recovery of Zimbabwe, however re-engagement with the Zimbabwean government remains conditional on it meeting key benchmarks in respect of political reform, consistent with the goals set out in the power-sharing agreement. These agreed goals include full access to humanitarian assistance, restoration of the rule of law, commitment to the democratic process, respect for human rights and commitment to macro-economic stabilisation. The international community remains seized of the situation in Zimbabwe, and is monitoring the developments closely.

Ireland has worked closely with our EU partners in developing a consistent approach to Zimbabwe, and we have repeatedly stated our willingness to re-engage with a Zimbabwean government which returns to respect for human rights, the rule of law and sound economic management. Ireland and the EU will continue to monitor the situation, and maintain contacts with key African partners, including the African Union and the Southern African Development Community. It is clear that Zimbabwe's neighbours have a critical role to play in encouraging reform, and can bring the greatest influence to bear in achieving progress in implementing the power sharing agreement.

In keeping with other international donors, Ireland does not provide funding to the Zimbabwean government, but responds to the humanitarian needs of the Zimbabwean people through support for the work of multilateral and non-governmental organisations. Thus far in 2009, Ireland has committed funding of over €5 million to a range of humanitarian programmes in Zimbabwe, focused on food security, tackling HIV and AIDS and supporting civil society organisations providing essential services for the population.

It is vital for the future of Zimbabwe that the unity government delivers on the promise of reform, and secures for Zimbabwe's people real political freedoms, a return to the rule of law and economic development. Ireland will continue to work with our partners in the international community to encourage progress in these areas.

Overseas Development Aid.

Kieran O'Donnell

Question:

37 Deputy Kieran O’Donnell asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the percentage of the overall overseas aid budget which is being devoted to the implementation of the recommendations of the Hunger Task Force; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21800/09]

The Report of the Government's Hunger Task Force (HTF), which was published in September 2008, recommended that Ireland can make a real contribution to tackling the root causes of hunger by increasing the productivity of smallholder farmers in Africa, by implementing programmes on maternal and infant under-nutrition and by ensuring that there is committed political action at national and international levels to give world hunger the priority it deserves.

I have welcomed this focused approach by the HTF on these three thematic areas and have also announced that the eradication of hunger will be identified as a key component of the official aid programme. In addition to making practical recommendations, the HTF also recommended that Ireland adopt an indicative target for the level of development assistance going to hunger related areas and suggested an allocation of 20% of Ireland's Overseas Development Assistance be focused on hunger and hunger related activities by 2012. We are now working towards spending approximately 20% of our aid programme on hunger and hunger related projects and programmes.

Human Rights Issues.

Martin Ferris

Question:

38 Deputy Martin Ferris asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if he will follow the French lead and without further delay make arrangements to offer protection to some of the innocent men in Guantanamo who will not be charged but have nowhere to go. [21711/09]

I understand that France has taken an Algerian individual detained in Guantanamo who was cleared for release and who has family connections in France.

The acceptance of detainees is a matter for decision by individual Member States. The Taoiseach has indicated that Ireland is willing to be helpful to the US on this issue. This position was confirmed at a recent meeting between Irish and US officials. Along with our EU partners, we are working towards a common EU approach to the acceptance of detainees by Member States who decide to accede to the US request.

Overseas Development Aid.

Deirdre Clune

Question:

39 Deputy Deirdre Clune asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the Irish and other development non-governmental and missionary organisations that have been informed of reductions in funding from the overseas aid budget in 2009; the amount of the reduction in each case; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21798/09]

Tom Hayes

Question:

43 Deputy Tom Hayes asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the amount of the overseas aid budget that will be channelled through Irish and other development non-governmental and missionary organisations in 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21797/09]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 39 and 43 together.

The overarching goal of the Government's aid programme, administered by Irish Aid, is the reduction of global poverty and hunger. Our partnership with development Non-governmental Organisations (NGOs) and missionaries represents a very important element of this effort, reflecting the broad support among the Irish people for the development programme. The OECD has confirmed that the proportion of funding channelled by Irish Aid through NGOs is higher than for any other international donor.

Irish Aid engages with development NGOs through the Multi-Annual Programme scheme, the Civil Society Fund and a number of Emergency funding schemes. It provides significant additional funding to NGOs under the development programmes in the nine priority countries for Irish Aid, where there is a commitment to long-term strategic assistance. Irish Aid also co-operates closely with Misean Cara, representing the range of Irish missionaries working with the poor in the developing world.

In 2009, the total funding from the aid budget which will be provided to development NGOs and missionaries will amount to over €135 million. This funding will support the work of NGOs in livelihood and food security, rural economic development, health, education, gender equality and the fight against HIV and AIDS. Irish Aid will also provide significant additional funding to development NGOs in response to humanitarian emergencies and crises during the year.

These figures reflect the decisions which have had to be taken across the aid programme following the difficult decision by the Government to reduce the overall budget for development assistance in 2009 to €696 million. The adjustment in funding plans includes a reduction of some 20% in funding for NGOs with which we have multi-annual funding agreements for long-term development activities and which receive annual grants of more than €500,000. The NGOs in question have been informed of the reductions. They are: Trócaire, Goal, Concern, Christian Aid, Self Help Ireland, Misean Cara, Aidlink, Christian Blind Mission, Childfund, Children in Crossfire, Fairtrade, Fodesapso, Plan Ireland, Progressio, Sightsavers International Ireland, Tearfund, The Carter Center, Vita, VSO Ireland, and War on Want NI.

There has been no reduction in funding for NGOs which have multi-annual funding commitments of less than €500,000 per year for long term development activities.

I very much regret the need to reduce the overall budget for development assistance, and the decisions which have been necessary on funding to the NGO sector. They have been taken solely in the context of the need to stabilise the public finances. The NGOs affected by the budget adjustments have significant autonomy in the management of these adjustments across their programmes, in the context of their overall budgetary situation. Irish Aid is working closely with the representatives of the organisations to ensure that the impact of budget reductions on the poorest and most vulnerable is minimised.

Tom Sheahan

Question:

40 Deputy Tom Sheahan asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the number of long-term development workers, volunteers and missionaries in the developing world who will be funded in 2009 by the aid programme administered by Irish Aid; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21799/09]

The Government aid programme, administered by Irish Aid, is supporting and is supported by over 1,300 long term development workers, volunteers and missionaries in the developing world. Their work is an important element in the overall Irish contribution to the reduction and eventual eradication of global poverty and hunger.

The Government has directly supported the work of volunteers in the developing world since the official aid programme was established over 30 years ago. Initially, support was administered through the Agency for Personal Service Overseas. Since 2003, it has been administered directly through Irish Aid. Many of the non-governmental organisations which receive funding from Irish Aid also devote a proportion of this support to the participation of voluntary workers in their programmes. In addition to providing funding for Misean Cara, the organisation which covers the personnel costs of missionaries in the developing world, Irish Aid supports a range of organisations which send long term and short term volunteers overseas. These include Voluntary Service Overseas, Suas, Serve, Goal and the United Nations Volunteer Organisation.

The Government will continue to provide substantial support for volunteering in 2009. I strongly welcome the interest being demonstrated by Irish people in pursuing volunteering opportunities in developing countries. The Irish Aid Volunteering and Information Centre was established in 2008 to promote responsible volunteering and to facilitate and harness this public interest in a constructive and positive manner. I was very pleased that over 400 people attended the Volunteering Fair organised by Irish Aid on 18 April in the Centre earlier this year. This level of interest reflects the high public support in Ireland for development and for our commitment to fighting global poverty.

Question No. 41 answered with Question No. 16.

Eamon Gilmore

Question:

42 Deputy Eamon Gilmore asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the aid that has been given in recent times to the Karamojo area of northern Uganda. [21831/09]

Uganda is one of the nine Programme Countries for the Government's aid programme, where we have a commitment to long term strategic assistance. The programme of support for Uganda, administered by Irish Aid, focuses on areas which will have the greatest impact on the poorest and most vulnerable people and communities.

Karamoja, in Northern Uganda, is the least socially and economically developed region in the country, with poverty levels of 69%, which is more than twice the national average. Literacy rates in the region are the lowest in Uganda, at 6%, compared to over 70% nationally.

Irish Aid has been providing support to Karamoja since 2004, focusing on the provision of secondary education. The main components of the programme are the construction and rehabilitation of schools, the provision of laboratory equipment, and a bursary scheme. In 2008, Irish Aid provided €4 million for school construction and rehabilitation. This programme involves the rehabilitation of 13 post-primary and training institutions in Karamoja and the construction of administration blocks, teachers' houses, latrines, classrooms, dormitories, libraries and laboratories. The construction of these new facilities, once completed, is expected to provide over 2,000 new school places.

In 2008, €200,000 was also allocated for the bursary scheme which provides support to allow students to avail of secondary education, 65% of these students are girls.

In addition to funds provided directly through the programme budget, Irish Aid provides significant support to a number of Irish non-governmental organisations in Karamoja, where Goal, Concern, and Trócaire are working to improve rural livelihoods and food security. Last year, Irish Aid also provided humanitarian funding of over €200,000 in response to emergencies caused by drought and food insecurity in Karamoja.

Question No. 43 answered with Question No. 39.

State Visits.

Dinny McGinley

Question:

44 Deputy Dinny McGinley asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the reason he did not meet opposition figures during his official visit to Cuba in February 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21870/09]

I visited Cuba from 17 -19 February 2009 on what was the first working visit by an Irish Minister for Foreign Affairs. Cuba is undergoing a major transformation, and its relations with the EU have entered a new phase. I availed of this new context to discuss a wide range of political, economic and social issues, including human rights.

I held consultations with the then Foreign Minister, Mr. Felipe Pérez Roque. Our discussions focused on the ways and means to develop bilateral relations between Ireland and Cuba, as well as on EU-Cuba relations.

During my visit to Cuba, I also met with the Cuban Minister of Foreign Investment and Economic Co-operation to discuss possible sectors for economic cooperation. In this connection, I visited the world-renowned Genetic Engineering and Biotech Institute.

Human rights issues formed a substantial part of the agenda in my consultations with the Foreign Minister. As the purpose of my visit to Cuba was to open up contact with the Cuban authorities, I did not meet with representatives of opposition figures. I hope and expect that Irish and EU relations.

Overseas Development Aid.

Pat Breen

Question:

45 Deputy Pat Breen asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the action he has taken in responding to the UN’s appeal for humanitarian aid for more than 1.5 million people being displaced by fighting in Pakistan; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21864/09]

Since August 2008, conflict between militants and government troops in parts of Pakistan's Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) has led to over half a million people being displaced. Over the last two weeks, an additional 1.1 million people have been displaced from a number of districts of the North West Frontier Province (NWFP) as a result of increased fighting between the Pakistan Army and militants. The total number of registered Internally Displaced People (IDPs) is now estimated by local authorities to be 2 million, out of which an estimated 65% are children. Thankfully the vast majority of these people are staying with relatives and friends and have not been obliged to live in camps.

I am very concerned about the welfare of the people who have been displaced and my Department is currently examining the UN Flash appeal for humanitarian assistance. We are also in discussions with a number of our established NGO partners. The outcome of this examination and of our on-going discussions will determine our response to this humanitarian crisis.

In the meantime, an immediate response has been provided by the UN's Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF) which has released more than US$8.3 million so far this year. Ireland is the 7th largest donor to the CERF. We will continue to monitor the situation carefully and will make a decision on any further assistance based on the needs of the Pakistani people as well as our ability to make an effective intervention.

Question No. 46 answered with Question No. 18.

Military Neutrality.

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Question:

47 Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs his views on whether it is appropriate for the vice-president of the United States to address US military troops in Shannon Airport in view of the fact that Ireland is a neutral country and the US military involvement in the war in Iraq. [21705/09]

The arrangements in place regarding the use of Shannon by the US military are long-standing arrangements which have been in place for decades and are not specific to the current situation in relation to Iraq. The Deputy will be aware that a resolution to continue to make the Shannon facilities available was approved by the Dáil in March 2003. I would further point out that the present US military involvement in Iraq is as part of the Multinational Force authorised under UN Security Council Resolution 1511 and for which the Security Council reaffirmed its support in Resolution 1546 of 8 June 2004.

The aircraft carrying US Vice-President Joseph Biden landed in Shannon on the evening of 18 May 2009 in order to refuel. Vice President Biden was en-route from Andrews Air Force base to Sarajevo. Permission for the aircraft to land at Shannon airport was granted in accordance with the normal procedures.

I understand that during his stopover the Vice-President met with and spoke to a number of US military personnel in transit at the time. This appears to have arisen spontaneously. It has no implications whatsoever for Ireland's traditional policy of military neutrality.

Diplomatic Relations.

Paul Kehoe

Question:

48 Deputy Paul Kehoe asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the contacts he has had with the new President of South Africa; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21783/09]

Jacob Zuma was elected President of South Africa by the country's parliament on 6 May, following a general election in which Mr. Zuma's African National Congress won more than 66% of the vote. Mr. Zuma becomes the fourth President of South Africa since the transition to democracy following the end of the apartheid regime.

On behalf of the people of Ireland, President McAleese has written to President Zuma to congratulate him on his election and wish him well in his new position. The President was represented at President Zuma's inauguration in Pretoria on 9 May by our Ambassador to South Africa.

Ireland enjoys a strong relationship with South Africa, and senior officials from both countries met in Dublin in late April in the aftermath of the South African general election in the context of the Ireland-South Africa Partnership Forum. South African officials provided a briefing on the priorities of the incoming administration, in the areas of education, health, safety and security, judicial reform and job creation.

South Africa continues to be a source of stability in the southern African region, and an important partner for both Ireland and the EU. I look forward to working with President Zuma's new administration to advance our common interests internationally and to support peace, stability and prosperity in Africa.

Overseas Development Aid.

Róisín Shortall

Question:

49 Deputy Róisín Shortall asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the extent of the cut to Ireland’s contribution to the Global Fund to Fight Aids, Tuberculosis and Malaria; the impact of this cut on the prevention and treatment of disease in developing countries; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21850/09]

I very much regret the fact that the Government were obliged, in response to budgetary pressures, to make short term reductions in the development co-operation budget. This adjustment to the aid budget has necessitated some modification in planned expenditure across the programme consistent with the central priority of our aid programme — the reduction of global poverty and hunger in the poorest countries of the world, especially in Africa. We are determined, once the Irish economy has returned to a pattern of sustainable growth, that we will resume expansion of the aid programme. Notwithstanding the reductions in the development co-operation budget, Ireland will continue to spend over €100 million a year to address HIV and AIDS and other communicable diseases.

Our contribution to the Global Fund to Fight Aids, Tuberculosis and Malaria will be €10 million in 2009. This is a reduction from the €17 million originally envisaged. However, total donor pledges to the Global Fund amount to US$19.2 billion, of which US$9.5 billion are for the three years 2008 to 2010. In this context the cut of €7 million represents only about one tenth of 1%, and will therefore not have any major negative impact on Global Fund operations. It should also be noted that, even with our reduced contribution, Ireland remains one of the world's top ten most generous nations in terms of Global Fund support in relation to GNP per capita.

Ireland will continue to play a key role in the Global Fund. In fact, engagement is set to increase as Ireland takes up the vice-chair of the influential Point Seven constituency of the Fund, with which comes an alternate seat on the Executive Board. In this position Ireland will use its comparative strength in relation to aid effectiveness to pursue improved efficiency in the use of funds, and thus the attainment of greater overall value for money and improved outcomes for the prevention and treatment of these three diseases.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions.

Joanna Tuffy

Question:

50 Deputy Joanna Tuffy asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if he will ensure that the European Union will offer adequate financial support to countries which have to adhere to climate change targets and may have difficulty in doing so. [21827/09]

Under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), and its Kyoto Protocol, binding targets have been set for the developed countries, but not for developing countries. The targets relate to reductions in the amount of greenhouse gases being emitted by developed countries. They are referred to as mitigation targets. No mitigation targets have been set for developing countries, in recognition of their minimal contribution to past greenhouse gas emissions and of the current and future needs of their economies.

The EU has demonstrated global leadership on the issue of emissions reduction and mitigation. It has translated the collective EU target set in Kyoto in 1997 into individual national targets for the Member States. It is agreed that any shortfall in meeting these individual targets will be met by Member States through the purchase of carbon credits under the EU carbon emissions trading scheme. These credits are purchased primarily through public finances, and are used to fund emission reduction activities in developing countries.

The EU has also taken a strong lead role in the preparations for the major international conference to be held in Copenhagen in December to agree a successor to the Kyoto Protocol. Ireland is participating actively in the development of the EU's position on the complex range of issues which need to be addressed, taking into account the needs of the environment, and of development. We consider it crucial that a global, comprehensive and ambitious climate change agreement is reached at Copenhagen.

The Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government has primary responsibility in this area. In order to ensure a consistent and coherent Irish position, the Department of Foreign Affairs has worked closely with his Department and with the Department of Finance in relation to climate change targets. We are all in agreement that the outcome of the Copenhagen Conference should support existing efforts to assist developing countries in dealing with the devastating effects of climate change.

The Spring European Council on 19 and 20 March 2009 confirmed clearly that the European Union will take on its fair share in helping finance the far-reaching measures which developing countries will have to take in order to adapt to the effects of climate change. The detailed implications for the EU will be examined further by the June European Council. The Government strongly supports the position that the EU must contribute its fair share in financing climate change actions in developing countries under any future global climate change agreement.

EU Enlargement.

Dinny McGinley

Question:

51 Deputy Dinny McGinley asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if all obstacles have been cleared to make way for Croatia’s entry to the EU; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21871/09]

Croatia hopes to conclude its accession negotiations in 2009. The European Commission has produced a road map for the conclusion of these negotiations, but this depends on Croatia making the required progress on the outstanding issues. These include privatising shipyards; judicial reform; organised crime; minority rights; and co-operation with the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY).

To date, Croatia has opened 22 of the 35 chapters of the negotiations. Of these, seven negotiating chapters have been provisionally closed. A dispute with Slovenia over maritime and land borders has blocked the opening of a further eleven chapters. Two planned intergovernmental conferences with Croatia to deal with accession issues have been postponed. The European Commissioner for Enlargement, Olli Rehn, has made a number of proposals to try and solve the border issue in a way that would allow the accession negotiations to proceed. His latest proposals are still being considered by the parties.

Ireland is fully supportive of Commissioner Rehn's efforts to find a solution to the impasse. A resolution to this dispute would give a significant boost to the accession process by removing one of the few remaining obstacles to the further progress of the negotiations.

Inter-Country Adoptions.

Michael D. Higgins

Question:

52 Deputy Michael D. Higgins asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the efforts he is making to finalise an agreement on inter-country adoption with the Socialist Republic of Vietnam; if he plans on visiting that country to help secure the agreement; the level of support he is providing to the Department of Health and Children; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21851/09]

As the Deputy is aware, the Office of the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs is working to create the appropriate legislative, policy and administrative frameworks that will ensure a well regulated regime of adoption, the aim of which is to support and protect prospective parents and, more importantly, the children for whom adoption services are devised and provided.

In addition, the Government is working towards securing a strengthened bilateral agreement with Vietnam. In light of concerns raised by other countries and which emerged during 2008, the Government decided it was necessary to seek a strengthening of the existing arrangements with Vietnam. With the publication of the Adoption Bill 2009, it was also considered necessary to ensure that both the content of a new agreement and its implementation would meet the minimum standards set out in that Bill and in the Hague Convention on the Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Inter-country Adoption. There has been ongoing close co-operation between my Department, the Office of the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs and the Attorney General's Office on the issue.

The Embassy in Hanoi has also played a major role in facilitating on-going dialogue with the Vietnamese authorities, and has been in regular contact with a number of Government Departments in Hanoi, again with a focus on achieving the requisite strengthening of procedures for the protection of children in any new bilateral arrangement.

The Minister for Children and Youth Affairs has stated on several occasions his wish to speedily conclude discussions on the text of the bilateral agreement, a draft of which is already under consideration. However, that is not to say that any guarantee can be provided in relation to the outcome of that process.

I and my Cabinet colleagues do not wish to speculate on the timeframe for or the outcome of these negotiations. There has been a high level of engagement on both sides and it is clear from progress so far that there is a willingness on both sides to bring the negotiations to a successful conclusion.

The need for any ministerial visit to Vietnam will be determined by the developments in the coming days and weeks. Our Embassy in Hanoi is keeping in close contact with the Vietnamese authorities. In this regard, the Deputy will be aware that the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs is already committed to travelling to the Socialist Republic of Vietnam at any time to facilitate the successful conclusion of these discussions, as and when appropriate.

Foreign Conflicts.

Olwyn Enright

Question:

53 Deputy Olwyn Enright asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the position in Pakistan; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21767/09]

Sean Sherlock

Question:

63 Deputy Seán Sherlock asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs his views on the language being used in relation to the response to terrorism by the government of Pakistan, which was reported as seeking the elimination of all terrorists. [21819/09]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 53 and 63 together.

The military offensive against the Taliban, which re-opened in the Swat area of Pakistan at the start of May, is continuing. It follows the breakdown in a ceasefire agreement with local militants which had allowed for the introduction of sharia law in the Malakand district to which Swat belongs. Real concern had been expressed, both in Pakistan and within the international community, about the extension of Taliban influence in the country.

The human cost of the military offensive is very great. The most recent figures provided by UNICEF state that the number of displaced people formally registered by local authorities, including since 2 May as a result of fighting in the Lower Dir, Buner and Swat districts of Pakistan's north-west, has now surpassed 2 million. About 200,000 of these are in camps and the rest are staying with their families and friends or in schools and other communal buildings.

The UN has acknowledged that the scale of the displacement is extraordinary in terms of its size and speed, and that it is causing incredible suffering. A UN Flash Appeal for humanitarian assistance has been launched and is currently being examined in my Department. My officials are also in discussion with a number of our established NGO partners. For its part, the European Commission announced on 14 May that it will release €5.5 million in immediate humanitarian assistance and that it is ready to step up this assistance if required.

There is no doubt that the Government of Pakistan is facing enormous internal security challenges. The Irish Government fully recognises the sacrifices made by the Pakistani people in their struggle against terrorism and extremism. However, I do not believe that use of the kind of language to which Deputy Sherlock refers in his question is helpful.

It is essential that the Pakistan authorities conduct the military campaign against the Taliban with full regard for the welfare of the internally displaced persons (IDPs). In this respect, I fully support the EU Presidency statement of 14 May which called on the Government of Pakistan to pay close attention to the situation of the IDPs as well as to the protection of human rights. The Government must continue its efforts to strengthen civil society mechanisms in Pakistan so that the lives of all its citizens can be improved.

There is a keen desire in the EU to strengthen and deepen relations with Pakistan and Ireland is strongly supportive of these efforts. Pakistan is critical for regional stability and co-operation in South Asia, as well as in the global context. Foreign Ministers discussed Pakistan at the General Affairs and External Relations Council (GAERC) on 8 December last and issued comprehensive Council Conclusions. These welcomed the consolidation of democratic civilian rule in Pakistan in 2008 and outlined steps for further strengthening bilateral relations. In this context, the first EU-Pakistan summit meeting will be held in Brussels on 17 June. I hope that there will be tangible results from this meeting, including in the areas of trade and development co-operation, and that it will provide the basis for enhanced engagement into the future.

Question No. 54 answered with Question No. 13.

Lisbon Treaty Referendum.

Phil Hogan

Question:

55 Deputy Phil Hogan asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the position in relation to the holding of a second referendum on the Lisbon Treaty; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21786/09]

Róisín Shortall

Question:

72 Deputy Róisín Shortall asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the date and the form, including such guarantees as have been referred to in the press, of his next proposed consultation with the public here on the matter of a European treaty. [21849/09]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 55 and 72 together.

The Government is working with the other Member States and the EU institutions to finalise the texts of the legal guarantees which the European Council agreed in December should be given to Ireland.

Specifically, we are finalising texts in the areas of taxation, defence and the provisions of the Constitution on the right to life, education and family. We are also working on a Declaration confirming the high importance the EU attaches to social issues, including workers' rights. In accordance with the December European Council's Conclusions, it is intended that this work should be finalised at the June European Council.

If the Government is fully satisfied with the outcome of this work — and we have stressed the need for legally robust guarantees — we are committed to seeking ratification of the Treaty by the end of the term of the current Commission, which is due to leave office at the end of October.

In this event, the Government will introduce legislation — possibly before the summer recess — to provide for the holding of a referendum later in the year.

Foreign Conflicts.

Sean Sherlock

Question:

56 Deputy Seán Sherlock asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the progress made through the medium of the United Nations or other agencies towards resolving the conflict over the future of Kashmir. [21818/09]

The situation in Jammu and Kashmir continues to be fragile, despite improvements following the State elections in Indian-administered Jammu and Kashmir in December 2008. I very much welcome the fact that these elections took place in a generally peaceful atmosphere. The elections resulted in the victory of the National Conference Party and the swearing-in of Omar Abdullah as Chief Minister in the State. Likewise, I welcome the fact that the more recent Indian General Election in Indian-administered Jammu and Kashmir also went off relatively smoothly and peacefully. I believe that the elections are indicative of the strong desire of the people of Kashmir to live in a society where politics rather than militancy determines their future.

A new government has also recently been elected in India with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh returning to power with a much strengthened mandate. This, along with the election last December of the new state government in Jammu and Kashmir, presents a fresh opportunity for India to focus its efforts on finding a solution to the problem of Kashmir, which has long been an obstacle to the normalisation of relations with its neighbour, Pakistan.

Developments in Pakistan, including the holding of democratic elections in February 2008, which ushered in the formation of a new government, and President Zardari's subsequent accession to office in September, had also augured well for an improvement in relations between the countries, and brought hope that progress might be made on resolving the conflict in Jammu and Kashmir.

Indications of the potential for an improvement in relations were evident in the outcome of a meeting in September last year between Prime Minister Singh of India and President Zardari, which included a pledge to resolve all outstanding issues between the two countries and bring lasting peace to the region.

Unfortunately, the Mumbai attacks of 26 November provoked an increase in tensions between India and Pakistan and the suspension of the Composite Dialogue, a process established in January 2004 to address contentious issues between the two countries, including Jammu and Kashmir. As a result, there has been an absence of progress in efforts to resolve the conflict.

Any resolution of the conflict will be dependent on good relations between India and Pakistan, as well as political will on both sides. It is important that every effort be made by the two countries to resolve the issues which have fuelled current tensions. The United Nations Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan (UNMOGIP) continues to serve in the State of Jammu and Kashmir. Its mandate is to supervise the ceasefire between India and Pakistan. The mandate does not include a political element.

Ireland, together with its EU partners, will continue to monitor the situation closely and encourage all constructive efforts to make progress on the issue.

Question No. 57 answered with Question No. 18.
Question No. 58 answered with Question No. 26.

Decentralisation Programme.

David Stanton

Question:

59 Deputy David Stanton asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the cost to date of the decentralisation of Irish Aid to Limerick; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21801/09]

Under the Government's decentralisation programme announced in 2003, 125 posts attached to the Development Cooperation Division of the Department of Foreign Affairs were to decentralise to Limerick. The Division is the Headquarters of Irish Aid. Following sanction of an additional 20 posts by the Department of Finance in 2005, the total number of posts attached to Irish Aid Headquarters increased to 145. Of these, 138 have now decentralised, moving to the new Irish Aid Headquarters building in Limerick in November 2008.

The principal cost associated with decentralisation is that of accommodation. This is a matter for the Office of Public Works. In addition to such property costs, and excluding staff costs, the Department of Foreign Affairs spent €833,276 in the period from January 2004 to date on the completion of the decentralisation project. The largest elements in these costs related to the purchase of ICT equipment and office machinery, as well as additional telecommunications costs for the interim premises and new permanent Headquarters.

In addition to the costs associated with the implementation of decentralisation, there are ongoing travel and subsistence costs associated with travel on business by officials between Limerick and Dublin.

Question No. 60 answered with Question No. 16.

Foreign Conflicts.

Denis Naughten

Question:

61 Deputy Denis Naughten asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if the political situation in the Balkans is causing instability in the region; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21863/09]

Together with its EU partners, Ireland attaches considerable importance to achieving stability in the countries of the Western Balkans, which the European Council, meeting in Thessaloniki in 2003, recognised as having a perspective towards EU membership. The European Union's Stabilisation and Association (SAA) process provides the framework for co-operation on economic, political and legal matters and aims to bring countries closer to EU standards and principles. Stabilisation and Association Agreements have now been signed with all the countries in the region except Kosovo.

Croatia is at an advanced stage in its EU accession negotiations and hopes to bring them to completion as soon as possible — provided it addresses the outstanding issues, including full cooperation with ICTY.

The EU continues to work closely with the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia as it works towards opening EU accession negotiations. In March, elections were held there and in Montenegro. The conduct of these polls was found to be largely in line with accepted international standards, which will be taken into account in the Commission's reports on these countries due later this year. On 15 December 2008, Montenegro submitted its application to the European Union, which the Council has referred to the European Commission for a formal opinion.

Albania submitted a formal application to join the EU on 28 April 2009.

Serbia signed a Stabilisation and Association Agreement (SAA) and an Interim Agreement, dealing with economic and trade matters, on 29 April 2008. The subsequent arrest of Radovan Karadzic on 21 July 2008 was welcomed by the September GAERC as a major achievement in Serbia's cooperation with the International Criminal Tribunal for Yugoslavia (ICTY). However, the SAA ratification process and the implementation of the Interim Agreement will not proceed until the Council decides unanimously that Serbia is cooperating fully with the Tribunal.

With regard to Bosnia-Herzegovina, the November 2008 GAERC noted the lack of progress achieved since it signed a Stabilisation and Association Agreement last June. Enhanced EU engagement was agreed to be necessary to help promote stability, especially during the transition from the Office of the High Representative to that of EU Special Representative. Earlier this month, the Council welcomed progress on preparatory work for a possible evolution of Operation ALTHEA. This force had originally been deployed under Chapter VII of the UN Charter to ensure continued compliance with the Dayton/Paris Agreement and to contribute to a safe and secure environment in BiH. The May GAERC agreed this Operation would be kept under regular review so that a decision on its future could be taken once the necessary conditions had been met. The Council reiterated that the possible evolution of Operation ALTHEA would need to take political developments, including the future role of the EU Special Representative, into account.

After the Kosovo Assembly's declaration of independence on 17 February 2008, EU Foreign Ministers quickly agreed a common response reaffirming willingness to play a leading role in strengthening stability, including by means of the ESDP rule of law mission, EULEX KOSOVO. It also agreed that Member States would decide, in accordance with national practice and international law, on their relations with Kosovo.

As the Deputy may be aware, 22 EU Member States, including Ireland, have recognised Kosovo's independence. Following the coming into force of the new Kosovo Constitution on 15 June, the EU's main aim has been the smooth transition from the UN mission (UNMIK) to EULEX KOSOVO. Since 9 December 2008, the latter Mission has been operating throughout Kosovo, including the Serb majority areas in the North, and has contributed greatly to maintaining stability in the country. EULEX KOSOVO includes eight members of the Garda Siochána and one support staff member from the Department of Defence. During a visit to Kosovo on 22 December, the Taoiseach and the Minister for Defence met with members of the 233-strong UN-mandated KFOR peacekeeping force and Garda members of EULEX. The visit also included a meeting with Kosovo's President Sejdiu and Prime Minister Thaci. Since then, on 21 January 2009, the new Kosovo Security Force (KSF) was launched and assumed its duties under the supervision of NATO. It comprises 2,500 troops with 800 reservists.

On 8 October 2008, on the basis of a draft resolution tabled by Serbia, the UN General Assembly agreed to request an advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on whether Kosovo's unilateral declaration of independence is in accordance with international law. With Government approval, my Department presented a written statement to the International Court of Justice in support of the unilateral declaration of independence by Kosovo of 17 February 2008. This approach has been followed by a number of other countries, including some EU Member States and the US, while Serbia has tabled documents in support of its position, which is shared by some Member States of the EU and others. The ICJ is now considering the submissions and its further deliberations are awaited.

I can assure the Deputy that Ireland, together with our EU partners, will continue to engage closely with developments in the Western Balkans. The international community shares our concern for stability in the region, as shown by recent visits of the EU's High Representative and the Vice President of the United States.

Question No. 62 answered with Question No. 18.
Question No. 63 answered with Question No. 53.

Overseas Development Aid.

Willie Penrose

Question:

64 Deputy Willie Penrose asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the number of meetings that have been held of the inter-departmental committee on aid. [21841/09]

The Government's 2006 White Paper on Irish Aid included the commitment to establish an Inter-Departmental Committee on Development, to be chaired at Ministerial level. The Committee was launched in April 2007 with the objective of strengthening coherence in the Government's approach to development and making best use of the expertise and skills available across the public service.

To date, eight meetings of the Inter-Departmental Committee on Development have been held. The most recent meeting was held last week, on 21 May 2009. Once agreed, minutes of the meetings are placed on the Committee's webpage along with reports and presentations made to the Committee by guest speakers.

As the current Chair of the Committee, I am pleased that it has become the key forum for the sharing of knowledge and views on development issues across Government Departments. The Committee is working to ensure that a strong development perspective is integrated into Government decision-making in all relevant areas. Based on a recommendation in its first Annual Report last year, the Committee is currently examining the preparation by a number of Departments of statements on their contribution to the improvement of policy coherence on development issues.

Since its inception, the Committee has discussed a number of important issues which cut across the responsibilities of a range of Departments. These include the report and recommendations of the Government's Hunger Task Force; the impact of climate change on development; the views of Non-Governmental Organisations on improving policy coherence for development; Ireland's engagement with the Bretton Woods Institutions; and the Netherlands' experience in developing a more integrated approach to development issues. The Committee has also received two presentations from the Institute for International Integration Studies at Trinity College Dublin on the preparation of its forthcoming report, ‘Policy Coherence for Development, the State of Play in Ireland.' At each meeting, the Committee has also received updates on developments at EU level and on the ongoing work on policy coherence for development within the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Foreign Conflicts.

Olwyn Enright

Question:

65 Deputy Olwyn Enright asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the position in Nepal; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21766/09]

The situation in Nepal has deteriorated since I last replied to a Parliamentary Question on Nepal on 27 January.

The situation has been especially tense since the decision by the former Prime Minister, Pushpa Kamal Dahal (or "Prachanda"), to dismiss the Commander-in-Chief of the Army, Gen. Rookmangood Katawal, on 3 May over a disagreement regarding the integration of former Maoist combatants and the recruitment of soldiers into the Nepalese army. The decision caused the Communist party of Nepal — Unified Marxist-Leninist (CPN-UML) — to withdraw its support from Prachanda and his Maoist-led Government. In turn, the decision by the Nepalese President, Ram Baran Yadav, to veto the Commander-in-Chief's dismissal led on 4 May to the resignation of the Prime Minister himself.

The integration of Maoist army personnel into a reformed national army is a central element of the peace process, but one which unfortunately remains unfulfilled. It was a key principle to which all parties subscribed under the Comprehensive Peace Agreement, but details as to how it would be implemented (including the number of former Maoist combatants who could join), were not agreed and the process of army reform has not yet begun. Recent reports of the recruitment of new personnel by the Nepalese Army, in contravention of the 2006 ceasefire agreement, has led to further dissension. It is vital that all sides comply with agreed commitments on this issue and work towards its speedy resolution.

I welcome the election of the new Prime Minister, Madhav Kumar Nepal, on 23 May. However, I note that the Maoists have said that they will not join the new Government. I call on all parties to act responsibly and in accordance with democratic principles in order to find common ground for peace and stability in the national interests of Nepal. It is important that all the political challenges facing the country should be resolved through dialogue and by peaceful means. In this context, the importance of making progress on the preparation of a new constitution before the deadline of 28 May 2010 set by the parties cannot be over-estimated.

Ireland is accredited diplomatically to Nepal through our Ambassador in New Delhi, who presented credentials there in April. Our Embassy in Delhi monitors developments in Nepal closely and remains in regular contact with parties there, including the Nepalese Government. The new Ambassador took the opportunity of his visit to Nepal in April to engage in political consultations with the Government and other parties and interests and to convey our views and concerns.

The EU is also actively engaged in Nepal and deployed an Election Observation Mission to monitor the elections in April 2008, to which Ireland contributed. Likewise, the UN Mission in Nepal (UNMIN) plays a vital role in facilitating the peace process. Its current mandate runs until 23 July. Ireland remains fully supportive of its work.

In 2008, Irish Aid provided funding of over €1.2 million to civil society organisations for development activities in Nepal. In addition, Ireland responded to the serious flooding in Nepal through a contribution of €89,000. A further €15,000 was provided towards the work of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in support of the Nepali Peace Process. To date in 2009, more than €650,000 has been allocated to civil society organisations for development activities in Nepal.

Arthur Morgan

Question:

66 Deputy Arthur Morgan asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if he will call for the suspension of the EU-Mediteranean Association Agreement with Israel, if Israel refuses to fully co-operate with the UN Human Rights Council inquiry into war crimes in Gaza. [21709/09]

Brian O'Shea

Question:

71 Deputy Brian O’Shea asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the position regarding the commission of possible war crimes arising from recent events in Gaza. [21828/09]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 66 and 71 together.

During the course of the military operations in Gaza in December and January, I strongly and consistently condemned the use of disproportionate military force in the heavily populated area of Gaza, which carried with it a very high risk, indeed almost a certainty, of high civilian casualties. This was tragically proven to be the case. I also called therefore, on behalf of the Government, for a full investigation into military actions which might have been contrary to international law and/or international humanitarian law. These could include use of heavy weapons in close proximity to civilians, attacks on specific types of target, or inappropriate use of munitions such as white phosphorus incendiaries.

My condemnation of such military actions stands, whether or not they can be specifically judged to be war crimes, which depends on questions such as the intent in their use, the military value of the intended target, the efforts made to avoid civilian casualties etc.

It should also be clear that rocket attacks from Gaza, which are deliberately aimed at Israeli civilian populations, are contrary to international law and unacceptable.

I therefore welcomed the establishment by UN Secretary-General Ban of a panel of investigation into incidents involving UN facilities during the conflict. These included missile or artillery attacks by Israeli forces on or adjacent to UN premises, and the burning of buildings and humanitarian aid in the UNRWA compound following a phosphorus attack. Secretary-General Ban has now presented the Security Council with a summary of the conclusions of the panel, which includes strong criticism of the actions of Israeli forces in relation to a number of incidents. The UN is now pursuing these issues, including the question of compensation for material damage, with the Israeli authorities.

The UN Human Rights Council (HRC) has also established a panel to examine violations of international human rights and humanitarian law committed during the Gaza conflict. It is regrettable and unhelpful that the HRC mandate referred exclusively to actions by Israeli forces. However, both the President of the HRC and the head of the new inquiry have made clear their view that the team must investigate allegations against all sides. The appointment of the distinguished former South African judge Richard Goldstone to head the enquiry adds greatly to its credibility. Judge Goldstone's three colleagues include a retired Irish Army officer, Colonel Desmond Travers. Unfortunately, Israel has said it is not prepared to facilitate this investigation, on the basis that the HRC Resolution and mandate which established it have already pre-judged the facts. Nonetheless I am hopeful that the enquiry will be able to carry out its work.

EU Association Agreements with our Mediterranean partners provide the framework for the conduct of our relations, including especially practical cooperation on matters of mutual benefit. They also allow for direct political dialogue, including on issues of concern. The Government has consistently been opposed to proposals for trade, diplomatic, cultural, academic, sporting or other boycotts against Israel. We need to encourage and support Israeli and Palestinian political leaders in their efforts to negotiate a settlement based on a two-State solution. A policy of boycotts or exclusion would clearly not contribute to that process. Nor would such a proposal have any prospect of being agreed by the Council: rather it would only marginalise Ireland's voice on these important issues.

Question No. 67 answered with Question No. 23.

Overseas Development Aid.

Denis Naughten

Question:

68 Deputy Denis Naughten asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the steps he is taking to ensure value for money with the overseas development aid budget; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21691/09]

As Minister of State with responsibility for our overseas aid budget, I am deeply conscious of the need to ensure value for money and impact on the ground in terms of poverty reduction.

I can assure you that the aid programme has in place a comprehensive programme of appraisal, planning, audit, and evaluation to ensure that funds are spent effectively and benefit the most vulnerable and poorest people of the countries in which we and our partners operate.

Our systems seek to maximise aid effectiveness and poverty impact, and ensure value for money. Proposals are appraised by Irish Aid staff using a number of different criteria, including quality of intended impact, sustainability, cost effectiveness and efficiency in the use of resources.

The Irish Aid strategic and annual business planning processes have a strong results focus which identifies specific results against which Irish Aid programmes are measured and evaluated. Programmes are continually monitored and assessed by both staff in the field and at headquarters to ensure that they are achieving results and that intended objectives and goals are being accomplished. External reviews are also conducted as necessary.

Irish Aid expenditure is subject to rigorous accounting, evaluation and audit controls. Programmes are regularly audited and evaluated by independent audit firms and by Irish Aid's Evaluation and Audit Unit. The Unit's work is also examined by my Department's independent Audit Committee. These audits and evaluations provide assurance that funds are used for the purposes intended and have a particular focus on poverty outcomes and value for money.

I am satisfied that the methods used by Irish Aid for planning and monitoring programmes, together with the audit and evaluation systems we have in place, serve to ensure value for money. Such methods are in accordance with international best practice and the highest standards in this area.

The OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC) Peer Review of Ireland's Aid Programme, published last month, highly commended the quality and effectiveness of the Irish Aid programme. The Report stated that Ireland was a champion of aid effectiveness.

Brian O'Shea

Question:

69 Deputy Brian O’Shea asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the contacts he has had with a bank (details supplied) in terms of constructing an appropriate response to the impact of the global economic crisis on sub-Saharan Africa. [21830/09]

The global crisis is beginning to adversely affect developing countries. In sub-Saharan Africa growth in 2009 is currently projected to fall to 1.7%. This follows years of solid growth. There is a real risk that cuts in public expenditure will reduce the provision of basic services in health, education and agriculture and progress towards the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) could be reversed.

The Government's official overseas development programme, Irish Aid, is working internationally with our donor partners and in our priority Programme Countries to build joint responses to the crisis by agreeing on fast-acting measures that limit the impact on poor people and protect progress towards the MDGs.

The EU has just agreed a series of measures to support developing countries in coping with the crisis. These include the frontloading of the €1bn Food Facility and the establishment by the Commission of a special mechanism, which will provide rapid funding to support social protection measures in 2009 and 2010.

Ireland is not a member of the African Development Bank (AfDB). Irish Aid co-funds many programmes, including in health, education and agriculture, with the AfDB in our Programme Countries. Our Programme Country based staff are engaged with Governments and other donors, including the AfDB, to ensure that the provision of basic services, and other programmes critical to the lives and livelihoods of the poor, are protected as our Programme Countries seek to cope with the global economic downturn. Ireland is striving to ensure that the international response adequately addresses the needs of Least Developed Countries and that the national response provides protection to the poorest people in these countries.

Human Rights Issues.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

70 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the extent to which he and his EU and UN colleagues have identified the top ten countries worldwide wherein it is deemed that the most serious human rights abuses take place; the extent to which it has been possible to make a positive interference to address the issues; the extent to which the relevant authorities have accepted or intend to accept responsibility and are prepared to co-operate with the international community to resolve the problems; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21802/09]

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

146 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if he is satisfied that adequate steps are being taken or can be taken through the EU or UN to deal with human rights abuses; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21993/09]

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

147 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the 20 countries currently most readily recognised for human rights abuses; the action taken or planned at EU and UN level to bring about an improvement in the situation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21994/09]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 70, 146 and 147 together.

Unfortunately, no part of the world is totally free from human rights abuses. As has been stated on previous occasions, in response to similar Questions, it is not the policy of the Government to draw up a ‘league table' of countries deemed guilty of the most serious human rights abuses.

Human rights concerns remain central to our foreign policy. Together with our EU partners, the Government closely monitors the human rights situations in many countries throughout the world, on the basis of information obtained from a variety of sources including both official and non-governmental organisations.

Where and when the situation warrants, we make known our concerns about human rights violations to the Governments in question, either bilaterally, through the EU, or through action at the UN General Assembly and the UN Human Rights Council, including, in the case of the latter, through the new Universal Periodic Review process whereby the human rights performance of each UN State is reviewed.

We support the use of the full UN human rights machinery in responding to human rights abuses, including supporting the role of UN Treaty Monitoring Bodies, Special Procedures and Mandate Holders and the convening, where appropriate, of Special Sessions of the UN Human Rights Council. At these UN bodies, the EU regularly makes statements on the human rights situations in a number of countries from all regions. Ireland is fully associated with these statements. The EU also introduces or supports resolutions dealing with specific countries.

Active participation in multilateral organisations such as the EU, the UN and the Council of Europe provides opportunities for Ireland to voice its concerns regarding human rights abuses. Through these organisations, international pressure can be brought to bear on those responsible for the violation of human rights.

The EU has adopted Common Positions on certain countries, which attach priority to promoting human rights, democracy, good governance and the rule of law. In addition, the EU conducts human rights dialogues with a number of countries and also raises human rights concerns as part of political dialogue meetings.

Together with our EU partners, Ireland has been a consistent and strong supporter of the International Criminal Court, recognising it as an essential means to combating impunity for the most serious violations of international humanitarian law and human rights law. The Court's Prosecutor has opened investigations into a number of country situations and we will continue to monitor this work closely.

The extent to which individual States comply with international human rights standards and obligations varies. Ireland urges all States to comply with their international obligations and in this regard stands ready, if requested, to assist States in complying with their obligations.

The risk of human rights violations is greater where political, economic and administrative systems are weak. Development is essential to allow people the full enjoyment of their human rights, and this concern is at the heart of Ireland's development co-operation programme. Irish Aid supports specific actions designed to promote human rights, including by strengthening government systems and in-country human rights institutions, in particular through legal training. Support is also provided for legal aid programmes targeted at victims of human rights abuses. Irish Aid has a specific focus on governance in several programme countries.

The Government will continue to avail of all the above-mentioned mechanisms as a means of highlighting violations of human rights and furthering their protection.

Question No. 71 answered with Question No. 66.
Question No. 72 answered with Question No. 55.
Question No. 73 answered with Question No. 10.

Consumer Protection.

Finian McGrath

Question:

74 Deputy Finian McGrath asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment if she will support a matter (details supplied). [21918/09]

Prices are ultimately determined by prevailing market conditions including the costs of doing business.

As the circumstances outlined by the Deputy appear to be a business to business transaction it does not fall within the remit of the National Consumer Agency. In any event it is a matter for the purchaser to ensure that he/she gets best value from the market.

Community Employment Schemes.

Noel Ahern

Question:

75 Deputy Noel Ahern asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the position regarding numbers on community employment schemes; the number in each category on schemes, that is, invalidity, over 55 years, lone parents and so on; if additional numbers are being allowed; the instructions that have been given to FÁS to create new vacancies in view of the fact that persons in the over 55 years category are being let go to make room for more spaces. [21940/09]

Community Employment (CE) is an active labour market programme designed to provide eligible long term unemployed people and other disadvantaged persons with an opportunity to engage in useful work within their communities on a fixed term basis. The purpose of CE is to help unemployed people to re-enter the open labour market by breaking their experience of unemployment through a return to a work routine and to assist them to enhance/develop both their technical and personal skills.

In response to the current economic difficulties, persons that are considered job-ready are progressed through FÁS Employment Services onto other options thus freeing up CE places for others in greater need.

In the April Budget I provided funds for 400 additional Community Employment places. Anyone wishing to apply for any CE scheme should register with their local FÁS Employment Services Office where their needs will be matched to the most appropriate FÁS intervention, which may include CE. All the additional CE places will be allocated through the normal FÁS gateway process operated by FÁS Employment Services.

A breakdown of the numbers on CE as at 25th May is provided in the following table.

Eligibility

Under 55

55 and over

Total

Lone Parents

4,745

218

4,963

Persons with Disabilities

3,619

2,237

5,856

Jobseekers Benefit

2,504

1,567

4,071

Jobseekers Allowance

3,145

1,388

4,533

Widows

249

471

720

Other

689

191

880

Supervisors

938

480

1,418

Total

15,889

6,552

22,441

Departmental Schemes.

Niall Collins

Question:

76 Deputy Niall Collins asked the Minister for Finance the details of the cycle to work scheme as announced by him in the supplementary budget of 7 April 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21901/09]

Legislation was introduced in the Finance (No. 2) Act 2008 which allows an employer to incur the expense of providing an employee with a new bicycle. The scheme also applies to safety equipment relating to cycling without the employee being liable for benefit-in-kind taxation. The legislation also permits the benefit-in-kind tax exemption to apply in the context of salary sacrifice, that is, where an employee agrees to forgo or sacrifice part of his/her salary in lieu of the provision of new bicycle by the employer. The employee will not pay tax, PRSI or income levies on the remuneration sacrificed. The scheme allows an employer to purchase a new bicycle and/or bicycle safety equipment up to a value of €1,000 once every 5 years on behalf of an employee.

A guidance note on the scheme including a series of Questions & Answers provided by the Revenue Commissioners can be found at: http://www.revenue.ie/en/practitioner/law/bik-exemption-for-bicycles.pdf. Circular 16/2009 Cycle-to-work relating to implementation in the civil service has just issued and may be viewed on www.finance.gov.ie.

OPW advertised last week for expressions of interest from vendors of bicycles, pedelecs and electrically assisted bicycles who wish to supply such equipment to those availing of the scheme in the civil and public service. The OPW information can be found at:

http://www.opw.ie/en/OurBusinessUnits/GovernmentSuppliesAgency/Cycle-to-WorkScheme/.

This site contains a list of suppliers. The list may be limited at the outset but shops and suppliers may apply to join at any stage.

National Flag.

Lucinda Creighton

Question:

77 Deputy Lucinda Creighton asked the Minister for Finance the reason the national flag is no longer flown in the front courtyard of a complex (details supplied) in Dublin 4 which is under the management of the Office of Public Works; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21938/09]

The matter raised by the Deputy is currently under investigation by the Office of Public Works. I will write to the Deputy as soon as the results of the investigation are to hand.

Pensions Provisions.

Michael Ring

Question:

78 Deputy Michael Ring asked the Minister for Finance if persons in permanent part-time employment have to pay the pension levy. [21963/09]

Qualifying public servants are liable to pay the pension-related deduction whether they are permanent or temporary, and whether they are full-time or part-time. Section 2, subsection (1) of the Financial Emergency Measures in the Public Interest Act 2009 sets out the basis of qualification for liability to the deduction.

I should point out that the amended rates and bands, effective from 1 May 2009, mean that in future earnings up to €15,000 will be exempt from the deduction.

Medical Cards.

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Question:

79 Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Health and Children the reason a person (details supplied) in Dublin 10 was refused a medical card. [21897/09]

As this is a service matter it has been referred to the Health Service Executive for direct reply to the Deputy.

Health Levy.

Róisín Shortall

Question:

80 Deputy Róisín Shortall asked the Minister for Health and Children the steps a person should take to reclaim the health levy where it has been mistakenly taken from them over a number of years; and the number of years they are entitled to reclaim. [21875/09]

A person who considers that they have made excess payments in respect of health contributions, should submit a claim in writing to the PRSI refund section of the Department of Social and Family Affairs. They are entitled to a full refund of any excess payments regardless of the number of years involved.

National Treatment Purchase Fund.

Kathleen Lynch

Question:

81 Deputy Kathleen Lynch asked the Minister for Health and Children if she will investigate if a person (details supplied) in County Cork will be treated under the National Treatment Purchase Fund; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [21878/09]

As this is a service matter it has been referred to the HSE for direct reply.

Community Care.

Joe Costello

Question:

82 Deputy Joe Costello asked the Minister for Health and Children the resources she provided for support services for carers; the support provided for an association (details supplied) in Dublin 15; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [21879/09]

My Department does not provide multi-annual funding to community or voluntary sector organisations. However, my Department does provide funding each year to community and voluntary organisations through its National Lottery allocation. In addition the Health Service Executive funds a wide range of voluntary bodies to provide services on its behalf or which are similar or ancillary to the services it provides. This funding includes the allocation of funds from the National Lottery Fund under its Vote.

The Deputy will be aware that this Government has, over recent years, provided significant additional investment either to put in place, or expand, a range of community based services such as Home Helps, Home Care Packages, Day/Respite Care, and Meals-on-Wheels. All of these are designed to support recipients and their families, so that those requiring care can remain in their own homes and communities for as long as possible. Additional funding of just over €200 million was provided to develop community services and supports for older people over the period 2006-2008.

I understand that part of the Deputy's question relates specifically to the Carer's Association in Blanchardstown, Dublin 15. The Department has not provided lottery funding to the Association in recent years. However I understand that the Executive provides ongoing funding to the Carers Association and I have asked the Executive to provide details of the funding allocated specifically to the Blanchardstown branch.

Health Services.

Ned O'Keeffe

Question:

83 Deputy Edward O’Keeffe asked the Minister for Health and Children if she will make a home curam care grant available to a person (details supplied) in County Cork. [21885/09]

As this is a service matter it has been referred to the Health Service Executive for direct reply.

Ned O'Keeffe

Question:

84 Deputy Edward O’Keeffe asked the Minister for Health and Children if she will arrange an appointment in respect of a person (details supplied) in County Cork. [21886/09]

As this is a service matter it has been referred to the HSE for direct reply.

Hospitals Building Programme.

James Reilly

Question:

85 Deputy James Reilly asked the Minister for Health and Children if construction of the new National Rehabilitation Hospital facility in Dún Laoghaire, Dublin, will commence in 2009; if so, the quarter in which it will commence; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [21889/09]

The Department of Health and Children and the Health Service Executive have been involved in ongoing discussions with the National Rehabilitation Hospital regarding its development proposals.

Clearly, development proposals such as this need to be considered within the context of an overall policy for the delivery of the relevant service. In the case of rehabilitation, there is an increasing demand, not just in Dublin but across the country, for new services and a growing requirement to enhance existing services.

Against that background, in July 2008, the Department of Health and Children and the Heath Service Executive established a Working Group to develop a policy for the provision of rehabilitation services. Its terms of reference include the development of an appropriate policy framework for rehabilitation and a preferred model of care for the provision of rehabilitation services.

The Deputy will appreciate the need to ensure that the proposed development at the National Rehabilitation Hospital is in keeping with any future policy direction determined by the Minister in the light of the work of this Group. The Group is due to report later this year.

The proposed development at the National Rehabilitation Hospital will be considered further in the light of the findings and recommendations of the Working Group on the Provision of Rehabilitation Services, available health capital funding and other competing investment priorities.

Monageer Inquiry Report.

James Reilly

Question:

86 Deputy James Reilly asked the Minister for Health and Children her views on the recommendations of the recent report on the Monageer case (details supplied); if she will supply details of the implementation plan which has been put in place; the Department that has responsibility for ensuring that each of the recommendations are implemented; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [21890/09]

I welcome the publication of the redacted report of the Monageer Inquiry. I believe that publication of the redacted report will facilitate greater awareness of the needs of families and will improve the response of service providers, and that there is great value in this.

The provision of appropriate, robust and responsive child welfare and protection services is a key priority for both me, as Minister of State with responsibility for Children and Youth Affairs, and the Government. The report of the Monageer Inquiry has identified a number of issues in relation to services for children and families, and my Office, the HSE and An Garda Síochána are taking actions on addressing the report's recommendations.

Some of the issues raised in the inquiry report relate to coordination and integration of HSE delivered services from hospitals, general practitioners, public health nurses, early intervention teams and other social work services, and the identification of a family with particular needs and the response to those needs.

I am pleased to acknowledge the new proposals unveiled in recent weeks by the HSE to support a more integrated health and social care system. The plan is to put in place a post under a National Director for Service Integration to address the service needs of children and families across the HSE. This is the first time that such an appointment has been made in respect of health and social services for children. Coordinating these services in order to provide an integrated multidisciplinary solution with good communication and clarity of roles and responsibilities goes to the heart of the recommendations of the Monageer Inquiry Report.

Another major development, and one which addresses some of the major communications issues identified by the Inquiry team, is the establishment by the HSE in February, 2009 of a Task Force to standardise policies and procedures for Child Protection and Welfare Services across the country, to be completed by the end of this month and implemented in June. This Task Force has involved detailed, in-depth consultation with social work staff and management in the HSE around the country and will set national standards across the HSE. It has examined issues around the reform of social work services, analysis of key management information flows and the definition and implementation of standardised business processes. The work of the Task Force will be significantly enabled through initiatives taken in the context of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and my office's Knowledge Management Strategy.

Whilst I acknowledge the need to provide out of hours services across the country, a key finding of the Inquiry reads: "that even if the Gardai or Social Services had called to the Dunne family home during the course of the weekend, it is likely that the tragedy would not have been averted".

From June 2009, the HSE will operate a place of safety service for children, to enable gardai to place children in a safe environment when they have to remove children from a situation of extreme risk. The HSE is also putting in place a more integrated multi-disciplinary approach to out of hours services, building on existing GP, acute hospital and mental health services, to ensure that people seeking services outside normal working hours can be provided with appropriate advice, information and support and in emergency situations access to specialist staff such as professionals working in the areas of mental health and suicide prevention; Other recent initiatives include: The HSE is commencing a comprehensive review of nursing services in the community, which will cover public health nursing services as part of the HSE Transformation Programme and development of Primary Care Teams. This review will have regard to the role, function and reporting relationships of public health nurses and community registered general nurses, and will take specific account of the public health nursing service for children under five years of age by reviewing systems currently in place; In March 2009, the HSE initiated a process, led by a small group with experience in EIT services, to prepare a framework for the delivery of Early Intervention Services, covering both statutory and non statutory providers, to ensure a standard and consistent approach to the delivery of such services. The policy of the HSE is to refer children with disabilities to Early Intervention Teams as early as possible. The group has carried out an extensive survey to establish the stage of development of Early Intervention services in each region. Work will shortly be completed on the linkages and respective roles between Primary Care Teams and Early Intervention Services (including the role of the public health nurse). This will assist in early intervention identification and appropriate referral by GP's, public health nurses and others; The development and implementation of Standardised Business Processes for social work related services for children across the country, is a prerequisite to the implementation of the computerised single National Child Care Information System (NCCIS). The HSE has allocated additional resources to this work over the past 12 months and it is at an advanced stage.

The Child Welfare and Protection (CWP) processes being standardised include: Referral; Assessment; Child Protection; Family Support; Family Welfare Conferences; Children in Care; After Care Services; Fostering; Youth Homelessness; Separated Children Seeking Asylum; and Adoption.

The NCCIS is aimed at supporting front-line staff in their day-to-day operations; improving the quality and consistency of CWP services provided; and enabling collaboration between these services and Community and Voluntary services. The existing collection of legacy computer systems which are at the end of their lifespan cannot provide the type of management information on children at risk that is required at local and national level.

To date the HSE and the OMCYA have expended a considerable amount of time preparing the groundwork for the NCCIS which is urgently required to support Case Management. The NCCIS will facilitate the recording of the case history of every child referred, from initial contact with the HSE through to final outcome. The HSE has developed a Business Case to advance the implementation of this system which is under the Department of Finance for approval via a review process. The Monageer Report identified a significant number of issues in respect of Public Health Nursing, Early Intervention Teams and Child Care Services. A pilot project is currently underway in Wexford and will be fully rolled out from July 2009, taking account of the Report's recommendations. The learning achieved will inform the HSE National Transformation Programme (2007-2010).

The pilot project includes:

Mental Health Service — Suicide Crisis Assessment Nurse (SCAN)—

The SCAN Service provides a speedy response to the GPs or Primary Care Teams' request for those in suicide/self harm crisis. This service started in April 2008 in the Wexford and New Ross areas with 24 participating GP practices and will be expanded across Wexford county to all GPs and Primary Care Teams and will include Out of Hours provision;

Early Intervention Services—

A Project Worker will be appointed to undertake a system review of the Early Intervention Service in accordance with national standards and criteria and will improve co-ordination between the Early Intervention Service, Primary Care Teams, Specialist Services and the Acute Hospital and;

Enhanced Communication—

The use of Information Communication Technology to support the transfer of information between various health professionals.

I also wish to note the ongoing work to develop a greater understanding of the phenomenon of familicide. To further our understanding of the complexities of this occurrence, the HSE established a group headed by Geoff Day, Director of the National Office of Suicide Prevention in 2008. The work of the group is focusing on identifying risk and protective factors and the measures that can be taken to minimise such risks. The above initiatives demonstrate that the Government and the HSE have been quick to respond to the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the report. The learning from this Inquiry is already being put to good use and my determination to improve services as a result of this learning is bearing fruit. This is what we should be concentrating on because we must look forward, learn and thus improve our responses in a coordinated and focused way in the best interests of children.

Children in Care.

James Reilly

Question:

87 Deputy James Reilly asked the Minister for Health and Children if she will confirm that the arrangements to be put in place under recommendation 8.2 regarding the taking into care of a child, under Section 12 of the Child Care Act 1991, will include the simultaneous attendance of a Health Service Executive employee at the house, or other place, from where the gardaí intend to remove the child and that the handing over of the child to the custody of the HSE, as provided for under Section 12.3(1) of the Act will be made directly to an employee of the HSE and not to a person contracted by the HSE; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [21891/09]

James Reilly

Question:

88 Deputy James Reilly asked the Minister for Health and Children the number of families approved to participate in the new Health Service Executive foster care that will enable gardaí to place children in a safe environment when they have to remove children from a situation of extreme risk; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [21892/09]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 87 and 88 together.

As these are service matters they have been referred to the HSE for direct reply.

Primary Care Services.

James Reilly

Question:

89 Deputy James Reilly asked the Minister for Health and Children the primary care centres that are up and running under the primary care strategy; the location of these facilities; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [21893/09]

As the Deputy's question relates to a service matter it has been referred to the Health Service Executive for direct reply.

Medical Negligence Cases.

James Reilly

Question:

90 Deputy James Reilly asked the Minister for Health and Children the number of medical negligence cases involving mishaps at birth over the past three years; the settlement in each case; the amount paid in legal fees; the duration between lodging the claim and the judgment or settlement; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [21894/09]

I have asked the State Claims Agency to compile the information requested by the Deputy and will arrange for it to be forwarded to him.

Medical Cards.

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Question:

91 Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Health and Children the option available for persons (details supplied) in Dublin 10; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [21895/09]

As this is a service matter it has been referred to the Health Service Executive for direct reply to the Deputy.

Health Services.

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Question:

92 Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Health and Children the reason a person (details supplied) in Dublin 10 has been refused adaptations for their house; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [21896/09]

As this is a service matter it has been referred to the Health Service Executive for direct reply.

Hospital Waiting Lists.

Joe Costello

Question:

93 Deputy Joe Costello asked the Minister for Health and Children when a person (details supplied) in County Sligo will have their long awaited operation; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [21900/09]

As this is a service matter, it has been referred to the HSE for direct reply.

Health Services.

Joe Costello

Question:

94 Deputy Joe Costello asked the Minister for Health and Children if she will provide rehabilitation in Dún Laoghaire Rehabilitation Centre for a person (details supplied) in Dublin 1; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [21912/09]

As the Deputy's question relates to service matters I have arranged for the question to be referred to the Health Service Executive for direct reply.

Hospital Waiting Lists.

Finian McGrath

Question:

95 Deputy Finian McGrath asked the Minister for Health and Children if she will support the case of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 5. [21915/09]

As this a service matter, it has been referred to the HSE for direct reply.

Hospital Services.

Finian McGrath

Question:

96 Deputy Finian McGrath asked the Minister for Health and Children if she will clarify a matter (details supplied). [21916/09]

Refurbishment work took place last year in St Vincent's University Hospital to provide eight single en-suite rooms for the exclusive use of people with cystic fibrosis.

The next stage in the development of St. Vincent's Hospital will involve the building of a new ward block to replace existing accommodation. The new ward block will include accommodation for cystic fibrosis patients with appropriate isolation facilities for the treatment of their condition.

I am anxious to ensure that the project is delivered without delay. The HSE, in partnership with St. Vincent's Hospital, have structured the tender for this development in such a way that payments for the works can be deferred towards the end of the construction period.

The design team have been instructed to proceed on this basis. They have now signed off on the design and will shortly be going to tender for the construction of the new building. It is intended that the construction, equipping and commissioning of this block will be completed as early as possible in 2011.

My Department has asked the HSE to respond to the Deputy directly in relation to the operational issues raised.

James Reilly

Question:

97 Deputy James Reilly asked the Minister for Health and Children the reason video fluoroscopy equipment was not available at Tallaght Hospital, Dublin, on the week of 18 May 2009 (details supplied); the arrangements in place to make such examinations available if a machine has broken down; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [21925/09]

As this is a service matter, it has been referred to the HSE for direct reply.

Hospital Waiting Lists.

James Reilly

Question:

98 Deputy James Reilly asked the Minister for Health and Children when a person (details supplied) in County Kildare can expect to have surgery carried out; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [21926/09]

As this is a service matter it has been referred to the Health Service Executive for direct reply.

Health Services.

Mary Upton

Question:

99 Deputy Mary Upton asked the Minister for Health and Children if she will address the needs of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 6W for home respite care; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [21927/09]

As the Deputy's question relates to service matters I have arranged for the question to be referred to the Health Service Executive for direct reply.

Medical Cards.

Frank Feighan

Question:

100 Deputy Frank Feighan asked the Minister for Health and Children the reason a GMS card has not been reviewed for a person (details supplied) in County Roscommon; the further reason they were not notified personally; and when this error will be corrected and a GMS card re-issued to them. [21932/09]

As this is a service matter it has been referred to the Health Service Executive for direct reply to the Deputy.

Health Services.

Emmet Stagg

Question:

101 Deputy Emmet Stagg asked the Minister for Health and Children the reason a child (details supplied) in County Kildare with ADHD and mild autism, who has been referred to Kill Health Centre for assessment, cannot be seen in view of the fact that there is no waiting list and only emergency cases are being dealt with. [21942/09]

As this is a service matter the question has been referred to the HSE for direct reply.

Ned O'Keeffe

Question:

102 Deputy Edward O’Keeffe asked the Minister for Health and Children if she will investigate an application for funding to provide new windows for a person (details supplied) in County Cork. [21957/09]

As this is a service matter it has been referred to the Health Service Executive for direct reply.

Medical Cards.

Ned O'Keeffe

Question:

103 Deputy Edward O’Keeffe asked the Minister for Health and Children if she will investigate the withdrawal of a medical card in respect of a person (details supplied) in County Cork with a long term illness. [21960/09]

As this is a service matter it has been referred to the Health Service Executive for direct reply to the Deputy.

Hospital Waiting Lists.

Billy Timmins

Question:

104 Deputy Billy Timmins asked the Minister for Health and Children the position regarding a person (details supplied) in County Wicklow; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [21964/09]

As this is a service matter it has been referred to the Health Service Executive for direct reply.

Mary Upton

Question:

105 Deputy Mary Upton asked the Minister for Health and Children the reason a person (details supplied) in Dublin 12 who is on a public hospital waiting list for more than six months is unable to access treatment under the National Treatment Purchase Fund and in view of her recent statement that a person may apply directly to the NTPF; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [21966/09]

I understand that the Deputy has already been in communication with the National Treatment Purchase Fund (NTPF) in relation to this case and received a response from the Fund on 21 May.

I appreciate that the person in question has been more than three months waiting for his operation. However, in line with policy, the NTPF is prioritising those who have been waiting longest for their surgery. If the person's condition has deteriorated significantly, he should contact his general practitioner who may decide to request the consultant to reassess the case to determine if more immediate attention is warranted.

Health Services.

Michael Creed

Question:

106 Deputy Michael Creed asked the Minister for Health and Children if a person (details supplied) in County Cork will be approved for benefit under the supplementary welfare allowance scheme towards the cost of dental works; the reason these works are not eligible under their medical card or social insurance scheme; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [21968/09]

As this is a service matter it has been referred to the HSE for direct reply.

General Medical Services Scheme.

David Stanton

Question:

107 Deputy David Stanton asked the Minister for Health and Children if hyoscine is available on the GMS; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [21969/09]

As this is a service matter it has been referred to the Health Service Executive for direct reply.

Neurology Services.

Damien English

Question:

108 Deputy Damien English asked the Minister for Health and Children when the Health Service Executive Strategic Review of Neurology and Neurophysiology Services will be published; the reason for the delay in the publication of this review following its completion in December 2007 and subsequent submission to the National Hospitals Office for review; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [21970/09]

The Health Service Executive (HSE) undertook a national review of Neurology Services to improve integration of services and optimise patient outcomes. Following consideration of the Review report, the HSE decided to seek an external expert opinion on the model of care proposed to ensure that the recommendations were properly aligned with the HSE Transformation Programme. The findings of the external experts are currently being considered by the HSE.

The issue of publication of the review is a matter for the Executive and accordingly my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy in this regard.

National Treatment Purchase Fund.

Ciaran Lynch

Question:

109 Deputy Ciarán Lynch asked the Minister for Health and Children the sum of money designated for hip and knee operations under the National Treatment Purchase Fund in the Health Service Executive south area; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [21974/09]

As the Deputy's question relates to the operation of the National Treatment Purchase Fund, my Department has asked the Chief Executive of the Fund to reply directly to the Deputy in relation to the information requested.

Cancer Treatment Services.

Ciaran Lynch

Question:

110 Deputy Ciarán Lynch asked the Minister for Health and Children if there is a designated specialist breast unit in Cork University Hospital; the location and facilities in relation to same; the names and years of experience of specialist breast surgeons in CUH; the number of breast operations performed at CUH in the years 2006, 2007 and 2008; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [21975/09]

Ciaran Lynch

Question:

111 Deputy Ciarán Lynch asked the Minister for Health and Children the number of operations performed in the breast services unit in South Infirmary Victoria University Hospital, Cork in each of the years 2006, 2007 and 2008; the number of specialist consultant breast surgeons employed; the surgeons’ names and their years of experience; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [21976/09]

I propose to answer Questions Nos. 110 and 111 together.

Under the National Cancer Control Programme there will be no Centre where diagnosis and treatment will be provided for one single cancer. Cancer centres will provide for a number of cancers in keeping with decisions made by Professor Tom Keane.

Symptomatic breast services have been identified as the first cancer services to be amalgamated and enhanced under the programme, followed by lung and prostate. In the South, this commenced with the successful relocation of the initial diagnostic and surgical symptomatic breast care services from Kerry General Hospital to Cork University Hospital Cancer Centre (CUHCC). The NCCP has set aside funding of €5m from its capital allocation in 2009 to further support and develop the CUHCC. This will enable the development of an integrated diagnostic centre, accommodating the symptomatic breast service and the planned rapid access diagnostic clinics for lung cancer and prostate cancer. On completion of this project, symptomatic breast services will transfer to CUHCC from South Infirmary Victoria University Hospital (SIVUH). The amalgamation on one site of highly-skilled experts affords an opportunity to consolidate and further develop an unrivalled service for patients in the South.

The number of operations carried out by the symptomatic breast disease services at CUH and SIVUH in 2006, 2007 and 2008, based on Hospital In-Patient Enquiry (HIPE) data received to end of April 2009, is as follows:

2006

2007

2008

CUH

102

113

118

SIVUH

181

234

228

Data refer to the number of breast cancer procedures carried out on women with a principal diagnosis of breast cancer. The 2008 data for CUH are 99.9% complete while the data for SIVUH are 93.6% complete. In addition, a further 181 operations were carried out under the BreastCheck programme based at SIVUH.

Accident and Emergency Services.

Ciaran Lynch

Question:

112 Deputy Ciarán Lynch asked the Minister for Health and Children the number of complaints which have been made in regard to the accident and emergency service at Cork University Hospital; if it is intended to publish such figures; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [21978/09]

As this is a service matter, it has been referred to the HSE for direct reply.

Inter-Country Adoptions.

Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin

Question:

113 Deputy Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin asked the Minister for Health and Children if an agreement entered into prior to 1 May 2009 to adopt a Vietnamese child will be binding in view of the State’s non-renewal of the bilateral adoption agreement with Vietnam; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22000/09]

As the Deputy is aware, the Adoption Board has statutory responsibility for the registration and recognition of foreign adoptions in the State. In relation to the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, the Board has advised that the situation regarding adoptions and applicants is as follows. All adoptions from Vietnam, which have been registered on the Register of Foreign Adoptions, are safe and secure. All applicants who have adopted children from Vietnam and returned to Ireland but as yet, have no entry in the Register of Foreign Adoptions will be registered subject to the usual statutory requirements. Applicants who have referrals in respect of children from Vietnam will be allowed to complete their adoption. There will be no new referrals from May 1st, 2009. The process of granting Declarations (which are not country specific) is not affected by the ending of the Bilateral Agreement with Vietnam.

Hospital Services.

Eamon Scanlon

Question:

114 Deputy Eamon Scanlon asked the Minister for Health and Children the position regarding the stroke unit and the orthopaedic unit at Sligo General Hospital; the future plans for the services at Sligo General Hospital; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22006/09]

As this is a service matter, it has been referred to the HSE for direct reply.

Medical Cards.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

115 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Health and Children when a medical card renewal will issue to a person (details supplied) in County Kildare; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22009/09]

As this is a service matter it has been referred to the Health Service Executive for direct reply to the Deputy.

Care of the Elderly.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

116 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Health and Children when respite care will be offered to a person (details supplied) in County Kildare; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22010/09]

As this is a service matter it has been referred to the Health Service Executive for direct reply.

Medical Cards.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

117 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Health and Children when a medical card will be awarded in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Kildare; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22012/09]

As this is a service matter it has been referred to the Health Service Executive for direct reply to the Deputy.

Health Services.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

118 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Health and Children if a review and an appeal will be offered to persons (details supplied) in County Kildare; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22013/09]

As this is a service matter it has been referred to the Health Service Executive for direct reply to the Deputy.

Services for People with Disabilities.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

119 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Health and Children when domiciliary care allowance will be awarded in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Kildare; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22035/09]

As the Deputy's question relates to service matters I have arranged for the question to be referred to the Health Service Executive for direct reply.

Garda Strength.

Thomas P. Broughan

Question:

120 Deputy Thomas P. Broughan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the number of members serving in each rank in the Garda Síochána; the number of members in respect of each rank under the age of 30, between 30 and 40 and between the ages of 40 and 50; the number in respect of each rank of members who have served fewer than ten years, between ten years and 20 years, between 20 years and 30 years and 30 years or more; the number of promotions to each rank above the rank of garda in each of the past five years; the number of persons recruited to the Garda Síochána in each of the past five years; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21919/09]

The information requested by the Deputy is outlined as follows.

Number of Members Serving in each Rank

Rank

Number

Commissioner

1

Dep. Commissioner

2

Asst. Commissioner

12

Chief Superintendent

50

Superintendent

180

Inspector

348

Sergeant

2,220

Garda

11,668

Age Profile by Rank

less than 30 years old

30 to 40 years old

40 to 50 years old

50 years +

Commissioner

1

Dep. Commissioner

2

Asst. Commissioner

3

9

Chief Superintendent

13

37

Superintendent

81

99

Inspector

20

242

86

Sergeant

19

720

1,055

426

Garda

4,789

3,903

1,989

987

Service Profile by Rank

less than 10 years

10 to 20 years

20 to 30 years

30 years +

Commissioner

1

Dep. Commissioner

2

Asst. Commissioner

3

9

Chief Superintendent

13

37

Superintendent

1

81

98

Inspector

42

230

76

Sergeant

123

844

899

354

Garda

6,895

2,259

1,701

813

Promotions to each Rank 2004-2008

Promotions to:

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

Commissioner

1

Dep. Commissioner

1

1

Asst. Commissioner

1

6

3

4

Chief Superintendent

8

14

6

12

8

Superintendent

17

40

14

40

22

Inspector

25

54

26

90

49

Sergeant

114

122

128

273

251

Recruitment in Each Year 2004-2008

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

Number of Gardaí Recruited

523

1,125

1,117

1,023

926

Garda Equipment.

Thomas P. Broughan

Question:

121 Deputy Thomas P. Broughan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he plans for the automatic fingerprint identification system to become live at Coolock Garda station, Dublin; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21921/09]

The current Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS), which went live in October 2007, is designed to meet both Garda and immigration requirements. The Garda Síochána has selected a number of locations, based on operational requirements, where the electronic capture of prints will be facilitated. In all other locations, fingerprints will continue to be captured and be forwarded to the Garda Technical Bureau for input to the system. I am advised by the Garda Síochána that there are no plans to extend the electronic system to Coolock Garda station.

Proposed Legislation.

Noel Ahern

Question:

122 Deputy Noel Ahern asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the position regarding enduring powers of attorney; the reason a person wishing to appoint a person with power of attorney over their affairs must notify all relatives of such appointment; his views on the recommendations of the Law Reform Commission in its report on vulnerable adults and the law; if he will introduce changes of law to allow named persons not to be so notified (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21939/09]

Section 9 of the Powers of Attorney Act 1996 provides that an attorney under an enduring power must comply with the notice requirements set out in the First Schedule of the Act before applying to the court for registration of the power. Section 3 of the First Schedule provides that certain classes of person, who are related to the donor of the power by blood or marriage, are entitled to receive notice of the court application. An application to dispense with this notice requirement for particular individuals may be made by the attorney to the court under section 4(2) of the First Schedule, which the court may grant if satisfied that it would be undesirable or impracticable to give such notice or where no useful purpose is likely to be served by giving it.

Section 10 of the Act provides that those given notice may make a formal objection to the registration of the power, which the court must take into account. An objection may be made on a number of grounds including fraud, undue pressure and the unsuitability of the attorney. This is an important safeguard to protect vulnerable persons from exploitation.

The Scheme of the Mental Capacity Bill, which I published in September 2008, provides for reform of this area of the law. The Scheme takes account of the recommendations made in the Law Reform Commission's Report on Vulnerable Adults and the Law. The Government's Legislation Programme announced on 22 April 2009 indicates that publication of the Bill is expected in late 2009.

Residency Permits.

Bernard Allen

Question:

123 Deputy Bernard Allen asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform when a decision will be made on the application by a person (details supplied) in County Cork. [21972/09]

There is currently no application pending in my Department for residency in the case of the person whose details were supplied.

If an application for asylum has been made by the person concerned the Deputy will of course be aware that it is not the practice to comment on asylum applications that are pending.

Asylum Applications.

Bernard Allen

Question:

124 Deputy Bernard Allen asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform when a decision will be made on the application by a person (details supplied) in County Cork. [21973/09]

The person concerned applied for asylum on 16 January, 2006. Her application was refused following consideration of her case by the Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner and, on appeal, the Refugee Appeals Tribunal.

Subsequently, in accordance with Section 3 of the Immigration Act 1999 (as amended), the person concerned was informed, by letter dated 27 February, 2009, that the Minister proposed to make a Deportation Order in respect of her. She was given the options, to be exercised within 15 working days, of leaving the State voluntarily, of consenting to the making of a Deportation Order or of making representations to the Minister setting out the reasons why she should be allowed to remain temporarily in the State. In addition, she was notified of her entitlement to apply for Subsidiary Protection in the State in accordance with the European Communities (Eligibility for Protection) Regulations 2006 (S.I. No. 518 of 2006).

The person concerned has submitted an application for Subsidiary Protection in the State and an application for Leave to Remain in the State. The Subsidiary Protection application will be considered first, following which the person concerned will be notified in writing of the outcome.

In the event that the Subsidiary Protection application is refused, the case file of the person concerned, including all representations submitted, will then be considered under Section 3(6) of the Immigration Act 1999 (as amended) and Section 5 of the Refugee Act 1996 (as amended) on the prohibition of refoulement. When this latter consideration has been completed, the case file is passed to me for decision.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

125 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the progress made to date in the application for residency status in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Louth; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22014/09]

The person concerned applied for asylum on 16 April, 2003. His application was refused following consideration of his case by the Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner and, on appeal, the Refugee Appeals Tribunal.

Subsequently, in accordance with Section 3 of the Immigration Act 1999 (as amended), the person concerned was informed, by letter dated 29 May, 2007, that the Minister proposed to make a Deportation Order in respect of him. He was given the options, to be exercised within 15 working days, of leaving the State voluntarily, of consenting to the making of a Deportation Order or of making representations to the Minister setting out the reasons why he should be allowed to remain temporarily in the State. In addition, he was notified of his entitlement to apply for Subsidiary Protection in the State in accordance with the European Communities (Eligibility for Protection) Regulations 2006 (S.I. No. 518 of 2006).

The person concerned submitted an application for Subsidiary Protection in the State in accordance with these Regulations and this application is under consideration at present. When consideration of this application has been completed, the person concerned will be notified in writing of the outcome.

In the event that the Subsidiary Protection application is refused, the case file of the person concerned, including all representations submitted, will then be considered under Section 3(6) of the Immigration Act 1999 (as amended) and Section 5 of the Refugee Act 1996 (as amended) on the prohibition of refoulement. When this latter consideration has been completed, the case file is passed to me for decision.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

126 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the position regarding an application for residency in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Louth; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22015/09]

I refer the Deputy to my detailed Reply to his recent Parliamentary Question, No. 95 of Thursday, 14 May, 2009, in this matter. The position is unchanged.

Citizenship Applications.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

127 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the current or expected citizenship status in the case of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 7; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22016/09]

An application for a certificate of naturalisation from the person referred to in the Deputy's Question was received in the Citizenship Section of my Department on 1 November 2006.

Officials in that section inform me that processing of the application is ongoing and the file will be forwarded to me for a decision in the coming months.

Residency Permits.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

128 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the position regarding family reunification and residency in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Limerick; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22017/09]

I am informed by the Irish Naturalisation and Immigration Service (INIS) that the person concerned has recently made a Family Reunification application on behalf of his wife and five children and submitted documentation to INIS on 23rd April 2009 in support of his application.

The Family Reunification section has written to the legal representative of the person in question to request further documentation and information.

Citizenship Applications.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

129 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he will waive the social welfare bus lane offence as a means for refusal of citizenship in the case of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 7; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22018/09]

The Irish Nationality and Citizenship Act, 1956, as amended provides that the Minister may, in his absolute discretion, grant an application for a certificate of naturalisation provided certain statutory conditions are fulfilled.

An application for a certificate of naturalisation from the person referred to in the Deputy's Question was received in the Citizenship Division of my Department in January, 2007 and I decided to refuse the application. The reason for refusal was disclosed to the applicant in a letter issued on 2 April, 2009.

It is open to the person in question to lodge a new application for a certificate of naturalisation with the Citizenship Division of my Department at any time. However, in doing so he should bear in mind the reasons for refusal of his previous application.

Asylum Applications.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

130 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the position regarding an application for residency in the case of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 1; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22019/09]

The person concerned applied for asylum on 27 May, 2003. He subsequently withdrew that application and indicated a willingness to return voluntarily to his country of origin. However he did not complete the voluntary return process. The person concerned subsequently consented to deportation and against this background a Deportation Order was signed in respect of him on 6 May, 2004. However, as this Deportation Order was not enforced by the relevant date it ceased to have effect.

The person concerned subsequently sought to be re-admitted to the asylum process and this request was facilitated with the consequence that his new asylum application was lodged on 3 March, 2005. His asylum application was refused following consideration of his case by the Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner and, on appeal, the Refugee Appeals Tribunal.

Subsequently, in accordance with Section 3 of the Immigration Act 1999 (as amended), the person concerned was informed, by letter dated 14 November, 2005, that the Minister proposed to make a Deportation Order in respect of him. He was given the options, to be exercised within 15 working days, of leaving the State voluntarily, of consenting to the making of a Deportation Order or of making representations to the Minister setting out the reasons why he should be allowed to remain temporarily in the State.

Representations have been submitted on behalf of the person concerned and these representations will be fully considered, under Section 3(6) of the Immigration Act 1999 (as amended) and Section 5 of the Refugee Act 1996 (as amended) on the prohibition of refoulement, before the file is passed to me for decision.

Asylum Support Services.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

131 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if permanent accommodation will be offered to a person (details supplied) in County Wexford; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22020/09]

The Reception and Integration Agency (RIA) is responsible for the accommodation of asylum seekers in accordance with the Government policy of direct provision and dispersal. The person referred to in the details supplied applied for asylum on 9 March 2005 and is currently availing of RIA direct provision accommodation at The Old Rectory accommodation centre, New Ross, Co. Wexford. Until such time as there is a resolution of this person's status he can continue to avail of accommodation in accordance with Government policy. The State does not provide permanent accommodation to such persons.

Citizenship Applications.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

132 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the current or expected citizenship status in the case of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 7; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22021/09]

An application for a certificate of naturalisation from the person referred to in the Deputy's Question was received in the Citizenship Division of my Department in May 2009.

On examination of the application submitted it was determined that the application in its entirety be returned to the person concerned for further attention on 14 May, 2009. In order to be fair to all applicants, only valid applications can be considered.

It is open to the person in question to re-submit the application to the Citizenship Division of my Department at any time.

Asylum Applications.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

133 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the current or expected position in the matter of residency or application under subsidiary protection in the case of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 7; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22022/09]

I refer the Deputy to Parliamentary Questions No. 234 of Thursday, 18 December, 2008 and No. 154 of Thursday, 26 June, 2008 and the written Replies to those Questions.

The person concerned arrived in the State on 24 June, 2003 and applied for asylum. Her application was refused following consideration of her case by the Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner and, on appeal, the Refugee Appeals Tribunal.

Subsequently, in accordance with Section 3 of the Immigration Act 1999 (as amended), the person concerned was informed, by letter dated 18 May 2005, that the Minister proposed to make a Deportation Order in respect of her. She was given the options, to be exercised within 15 working days, of leaving the State voluntarily, of consenting to the making of a Deportation Order or of making representations to the Minister setting out the reasons why she should be allowed to remain temporarily in the State. Representations were submitted by the person concerned at that time.

On 26 July, 2005, the Minister signed a Deportation Order in respect of the person concerned. Notice of this Order was served by registered post. This communication advised the person concerned of the legal requirement that she ‘present' herself at the Offices of the Garda National Immigration Bureau (GNIB) on 18 August, 2005 in order to make arrangements for her deportation from the State. The person concerned ‘presented' on this occasion but failed to ‘present' on a subsequent occasion and was therefore classified as a person evading deportation.

This position continued to obtain until May 2008 when the legal representative of the person concerned enquired into the possible entitlement of the person concerned to make an application for Subsidiary Protection in the State. Arising from this enquiry, and in accordance with the Minister's discretion under Regulation 4(2) of the European Communities (Eligibility for Protection) Regulations 2006, the person concerned was allowed to submit an application for Subsidiary Protection in the State which she duly did. This application is under consideration at present. When consideration of this application has been completed, the person concerned will be notified in writing of the outcome.

The person concerned remains the subject of a valid Deportation Order. However, the Deputy may be assured that this Order will not be enforced pending the determination of the Subsidiary Protection application.

Residency Permits.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

134 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the position regarding the application for residency in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Kildare; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22023/09]

An application for long-term residency by the person referred to by the Deputy was made on 22 September last year. Officials have advised me that applications from September 2007 are currently being dealt with. In the interest of fairness, applications are processed in chronological order. As soon as a decision is made on the case, the person concerned will be notified.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

135 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the residency status in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Kildare; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22024/09]

I refer the Deputy to Parliamentary Question No. 345 of Wednesday, 6 May 2009, and the written Reply to that Question.

In the meantime, the person concerned has submitted an application for Subsidiary Protection in the State and an application for Leave to Remain in the State. The Subsidiary Protection application will be considered first, following which the person concerned will be notified in writing of the outcome.

In the event that the Subsidiary Protection application is refused, the case file of the person concerned, including all representations submitted, will then be considered under Section 3(6) of the Immigration Act 1999 (as amended) and Section 5 of the Refugee Act 1996 (as amended) on the prohibition of refoulement. When this latter consideration has been completed, the case file is passed to me for decision.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

136 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if it is expected to grant permission to remain or family reunification in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Kildare; if it is possible for them to finish their exams; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22039/09]

I have been informed by the Irish Naturalisation and Immigration Service that they informed the person referred to in the Deputy's Question that his application was refused and advised him to leave the State by the 8th May 2009.

Good Friday Agreement.

Billy Timmins

Question:

137 Deputy Billy Timmins asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the position regarding funding for Irish bodies under the Good Friday Agreement. [21949/09]

Arising from the Good Friday Agreement of 1998, six North/South Implementation Bodies and Tourism Ireland were established. These Bodies play a significant role in taking forward North/South co-operation on the island.

The North/South Bodies are jointly funded by the Government and the Northern Ireland Executive. Funding from each jurisdiction is provided on an agreed proportionate basis having regard to the benefits accruing to each jurisdiction and the specific factors related to each Body. The funding of the individual Bodies is a matter for the responsible Departments, North and South, in each case. My Department does not fund any of the North/South Bodies.

Total funding for the Bodies from both jurisdictions in 2008 amounted to some €187m. Total Government funding for the Bodies in 2008 was €129m.

The budgets of the North/South Bodies for 2009 are under consideration by the sponsor Departments of the Bodies and the Department of Finance together with their Northern counterparts with a view to agreement within the North South Ministerial Council. In that connection, the Department of Finance is working with the Northern Ireland Department of Finance and Personnel on an agreed approach on identifying savings in the budgets of the North/South Bodies in the coming year.

The North/South Implementation Bodies and Tourism Ireland remain an important component of the overall institutional architecture on this island arising from the Good Friday Agreement. They are unique, cross-jurisdictional entities which operate on an all-island basis under the overall direction of the North South Ministerial Council. Since the re-establishment of the power-sharing institutions in 2007, the relevant Ministers have had a range of useful and productive meetings in relation to the Bodies with their Northern counterparts within the framework of the North South Ministerial Council. The full and continuing effectiveness of the North/South Bodies remains a high priority for the Government.

Foreign Conflicts.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

138 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if he will report on the situation in the Democratic Republic of Congo with particular reference on the hardship experienced by the international community; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21985/09]

The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) is slowly recovering from the effects of the brutal civil war which lasted from 1996 to 2003. While much of the country now enjoys a degree of stability, I remain deeply concerned by the situation in the east of the country. Renewed heavy fighting broke out in North Kivu in August 2008 between the Congrès National pour la Défense du Peuple (CNDP) and the armed forces of DRC. An unknown number of civilians were killed by both sides, many women were raped, and 250,000 people were forced to flee their homes, bringing to over 1 million the number displaced in North Kivu. The CNDP declared a ceasefire in October 2008, and talks began in Nairobi in December between representatives of the DRC government and the CNDP, under UN and African Union facilitation and CNDP fighters are now being integrated into the DRC armed forces.

In parallel with the Nairobi talks, the governments of DRC and Rwanda agreed to put aside the mutual hostility which has persisted since previous Rwandan incursions into DRC in support of ethnic Tutsis, and their armed forces began joint operations against the Forces Democratiques de Liberation du Rwanda (FDLR), many of whom fled Rwanda to escape punishment for crimes committed during the 1994 Rwandan genocide. The joint offensive did not achieve its objectives and the FDLR continues to be a threat to the civilian population. Since January, attacks by the FDLR in North and South Kivu have driven more than 370,000 people from their homes and into forests and other places of refuge.

Separately, appalling atrocities have been committed in Orientale Province in north-eastern DRC by the Ugandan rebel group, the Lord's Resistance Army (LRA). Following the LRA's failure to sign a negotiated peace agreement, Ugandan and Congolese armed forces launched a joint offensive against the group in December 2008. Fleeing this offensive, LRA fighters carried out brutal attacks on the civilian population, in which up to 1,100 civilians were killed. In March 2009, the Ugandan Army stated that it had achieves its objective of dismantling the LRA's command structure, and began a phased withdrawal of troops from north-eastern DRC.

I am gravely concerned by recent reports of an increase in attacks against international aid organisations and humanitarian workers in North and South Kivu. UN agencies have reported 44 attacks against humanitarian workers in the region between January and April. The vehicles of humanitarian organisations have been intercepted to transport fighters, and in some cases property has been looted. The security situation, as well as difficulties in securing access to those in need, due to poor roads which are frequently impassable due to rains, pose enormous challenges for international aid agencies and humanitarian workers who aim to address the needs of civilians affected by conflict.

The international community has sought to enhance stability in DRC through the work of MONUC, the UN's largest peacekeeping mission. Ireland and our EU partners strongly support MONUC, and have welcomed the UN Security Council's decision to authorise the reinforcement of the mission to allow it to meet more effectively the challenges it currently faces. Ireland contributes three members of the Defence Forces to MONUC as Military Liaison Officers.

Ireland has been able to respond quickly to the humanitarian dimension of the crisis in DRC. An airlift of emergency relief supplies was made to eastern DRC in December 2008. Thus far in 2009, Irish Aid has allocated more than €4 million in humanitarian funding to the DRC through the UN and NGO partners, bringing total humanitarian support to the country since 2006 to over €26 million.

Question No. 139 answered with Question No. 13.

Overseas Development Aid.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

140 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the extent to which the international community is combating the problem of AIDS in Africa; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21987/09]

The international community has demonstrated real commitment to combat HIV and AIDS and its consequences through a number of high profile agreements that include the Millennium Development Goals universally supported in 2000, the commitment signed by 189 UN Member States following the United Nations General Assembly Special Session on HIV and AIDS in 2001, and the special commitment made in 2005 by the G8 grouping to support universal access to treatment.

Ireland, through Irish Aid, is supporting actions to address HIV and AIDS through expenditures of more than €100 million a year to address that disease and other communicable diseases. This commitment by Ireland has been recognised by the OECD in the Peer Review published earlier this month.

Progress towards these international commitments has been impressive. The UNAIDS world report for 2008 points to a six-fold increase in funding available for HIV and AIDS in this decade so far and describes a remarkable boost in delivery of important HIV and AIDS services and activities at global, regional and country levels, with very particular emphasis in those countries most affected. A notable and valuable development has been the unprecedented number of civil society groups that have become active in HIV and AIDS work and have joined hands with their government counterparts to more effectively tackle common challenges through partnerships.

It is possible to sustain and replicate the gains we see today with effective global and national leadership and with commitment by donors to support HIV and AIDS services and activities. Ireland continues to promote the need for leadership and engagement at the highest political level internationally, in order to push back this pandemic. At country level, Ireland works closely with and supports national leadership to hold the ground already gained and to continue to make further progress.

EU Enlargement.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

141 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the extent to which he and his EU colleagues remain to be engaged in positively influencing the situation in the Western Balkans with particular reference to EU enlargement; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21988/09]

Together with its EU partners, Ireland attaches considerable importance to achieving stability in the countries of the Western Balkans, which were recognised as having a perspective towards EU membership by the European Council at Thessaloniki in 2003. The efforts made by the countries of the region to meet the criteria for membership of the EU have varied.

While the future prospect of EU membership is a very important element of our relations with countries in the Western Balkan region, the European Union's Stabilisation and Association (SAA) process provides the framework for co-operation on economic, political and legal matters and aims to bring countries closer to EU standards and principles. The SAA process, therefore, is the framework in which our engagement is managed on an ongoing basis in order to positively influence the situation in the region. Stabilisation and Association Agreements have now been signed with all the countries in the region except Kosovo.

In terms of EU enlargement, Croatia is at an advanced stage in its accession negotiations and hopes to bring them to completion as soon as possible, but it needs to address some outstanding issues, including full cooperation with the International Criminal Tribunal for Yugoslavia. The EU continues to work closely with the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia as it works towards opening EU accession negotiations. In March, elections were held there and in Montenegro. The conduct of these polls was largely in line with accepted international standards. On 15 December 2008, Montenegro submitted its application to join the European Union, which the Council has referred to the European Commission for a formal opinion. Albania submitted a formal application to join the EU on 28 April 2009.

Ireland, together with our EU partners, will continue to monitor developments in this region closely. Through our programme of assistance to new Member States and candidate countries, a large number of officials from these countries have participated in Irish-run training programmes. These have served to enhance their knowledge of the EU and to assist them with their preparations for accession to the Union.

In our contribution to EU discussions, we will continue to support the reform process across the Western Balkans as this represents the best way in which these countries can prepare for the fulfilment of their aspirations with regard to EU membership.

Diplomatic Representation.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

142 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the extent to which it is expected or intended to establish further embassies abroad; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21989/09]

Ireland has a network of 75 resident diplomatic and consular Missions abroad, as well as the British-Irish Inter-Governmental Secretariat in Belfast and the North-South Ministerial Council Joint Secretariat in Armagh.

While the opening of new Embassies abroad is considered by the Government on an ongoing basis, any expansion of our diplomatic network can, as I am sure the Deputy will appreciate, only be undertaken having regard to clear national priorities and available resources. The significant budgetary pressures currently being faced by my Department, as for all Government Departments, means that any decision to open a new Mission overseas must be on the basis of an anticipated significant return for the State.

The United Arab Emirates was identified as a country where increased diplomatic representation would offer significant potential economic value to Ireland. Accordingly, and in order to take advantage of this potential, the Government decided to establish an Embassy in Abu Dhabi, which will open in the Autumn.

The Strategic Review of US-Ireland Relations was launched by the Taoiseach in March of this year. The Review recommended the opening of a Consulate General of Ireland in Atlanta. The implementation of this recommendation is currently under consideration.

The most recent Embassy to be established was in Malawi in October 2007. The Government decided to establish an Embassy there, after the White Paper on Irish Aid, published in September 2006, designated Malawi as Ireland's ninth programme country.

In the Government's "Smart Economy" document, published at the end of 2008, my Department committed to reviewing its network of missions abroad in order to ensure that they are operating at an optimum level of efficiency, are delivering tangible services and outcomes for the benefit of Ireland and its citizens, and that resources are aligned with our strategic objectives.

Question No. 143 answered with Question No. 31.

Overseas Development Aid.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

144 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if procedures have been put in place to ensure that all international aid goes directly to those for whom it was intended thereby eliminating waste or corruption; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21991/09]

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

145 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if specific new efforts are being made to ensure that international aid to various countries is received in full by those for whom it was intended; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21992/09]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 144 and 145 together.

The Government's aid programme, administered by Irish Aid, is recognised internationally for its lead role in ensuring the effectiveness of development aid. The recently published report of the peer review of the aid programme, which was carried out by the Development Assistance Committee of the OECD, described Irish Aid as "a strong, cutting edge development cooperation programme" focusing on delivering results. It stated that "Ireland is a champion in making aid more effective". In the face of global economic crisis, when aid budgets internationally are under pressure, we owe it to the people of the developing world to redouble our efforts to ensure that international development assistance is clearly focused on achieving results for the poorest people and communities in the world. Ireland will continue to play a strong international role in this regard.

Ireland's development aid programme provides assistance to over ninety developing countries. It has a particular focus on nine programme countries, where we have a commitment to long term strategic support. These are Ethiopia, Lesotho, Mozambique, Tanzania, Timor-Leste, Uganda, Vietnam and Zambia. In our programme countries, development strategies are agreed in consultation with national Governments in support of their own poverty reduction strategies. These agreed strategies outline the areas where Irish Aid will provide support over a three to five year period. They contain monitoring frameworks with indicators and targets against which to measure improvements in basic services. The promotion of good governance is an essential element of all our country strategies. Irish Aid also works in cooperation with other international donors to strengthen public financial management systems and institutions of Government, such as the Auditor General function, in order to eliminate waste and corruption.

In addition, Irish Aid supports a number of initiatives at international level which are helping to improve governance. This includes assistance towards the work of the leading anti-corruption NGO, Transparency International, which is helping to fight corruption globally and the Association of Western European Parliamentarians for Africa which is helping to build the oversight capacity of Parliaments in Eastern Africa.

The Government has put in place rigorous accounting and audit controls for Irish Aid, to ensure its programmes are regularly audited and evaluated by independent audit firms, by Irish Aid's own Evaluation and Audit Unit and by the independent Audit Committee of the Department of Foreign Affairs. This is essential, in order to ensure that funding is directed to those areas most in need, is used for the purposes intended and represents the best value for money. We will continue to deliver on our commitment that all aid funded by the taxpayer will benefit the poorest and most vulnerable in the countries with which Irish Aid is working.

Questions Nos. 146 and 147 answered with Question No. 70.
Question No. 148 answered with Question No. 26.

Foreign Conflicts.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

149 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the extent to which the international community expects to stabilise the situation in Darfur; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21996/09]

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

150 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the extent to which the international community plans to make further positive intervention in the Sudan; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21997/09]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 149 and 150 together.

The situation in Sudan continues to be a focus of considerable international concern with attention centring on the resolution of the ongoing conflict in Darfur, support for the Comprehensive Peace Agreement which ended the north-south civil war, and efforts to address the consequences of the Sudanese Government's decision in March to expel thirteen international humanitarian agencies from the country. Recent months have seen considerable engagement on these issues by the United Nations, by Sudan's regional neighbours through the African Union, and by the European Union.

The persistence of the conflict in Darfur, coupled with the ongoing suffering of the people of the region, are matters of grave concern. Despite a number of ceasefires and peace agreements, hostilities on the ground continue. International efforts to bring an end to the conflict are being led by the joint AU-UN chief mediator, Djibril Bassolé, whose work Ireland fully supports. Progress in peace talks has been disappointingly slow and the "Agreement of Good Will and Confidence Building" signed in Doha in February by the Sudanese Government and the JEM rebel group, falls far short of a full peace deal. The AU has established a High Level Panel on Darfur, under the chairmanship of former President Thabo Mbeki, whose mandate encompasses peace and reconciliation in Darfur. Members of the Panel visited Darfur in April and are due to report in July. Meanwhile the fighting in Darfur continues. It is imperative and long overdue that all sides demonstrate the political will and commitment needed to resolve this long-running conflict.

Ensuring the full implementation of the 2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA), which brought an end to the north-south conflict in Sudan, is also a priority for the international community. Serious north-south violence continues to erupt from time to time, and there are continuing tensions over north-south boundary demarcation and the division of oil wealth. South Sudan remains chronically under-developed and a referendum on independence is scheduled for 2011. International donors, including the EU, are currently examining the most appropriate modalities for supporting the development of the south and the consolidation of the peace deal.

The expulsion by the Sudanese Government in March of thirteen international humanitarian organisations, following the announcement by the International Criminal Court of the issue of a warrant for the arrest of Sudanese President, Omar al-Bashir, gave rise to serious concern internationally. The agencies concerned accounted for over 40 per cent of all aid in Sudan, and provided food, safe water and basic health care to more than a million people. The United Nations has been very active in assessing the potential consequences of these expulsions and working to put alternative humanitarian capacity in place. International partners have put strong pressure on the Sudanese Government to encourage them to reconsider the expulsions, and to ensure that their impact on the humanitarian situation is minimised.

Ireland has played an important part in the international response to the humanitarian situation in Sudan. Since 2006, Ireland has provided over €50 million in funding for work in Sudan, including Darfur. The Irish Aid Rapid Response Corps currently has five people on deployment with UN agencies in Sudan.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

151 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the extent to which the situation in Chad has improved or stabilised; if intervention by the international community can assist; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21998/09]

The situation in Chad has long been characterised by north-south tensions, and since 2002 the stability of the country has been threatened by armed rebellion against the government of President Idriss Déby. While the government signed an accord with civilian opposition parties in 2007, providing for a degree of political reform, armed rebel groups have remained active and intent on overthrowing the government by force. A major rebel offensive threatened the capital, N'Djamena, in February 2008, but was ultimately defeated by government forces.

The consolidation of a range of disparate rebel groups under the banner of the Union des Forces de la Résistance (UFR) in November 2008 preceded a significant military build-up by both government and rebel forces. After a prolonged period of relative calm, the UFR launched an offensive from the vicinity of the border with Sudan in early May. The rebels' objective appears to have been to reach N'Djamena, as they had previously. In an engagement on 7 May near Am Dam in eastern Chad, government forces succeeded in halting the rebel advance.

The Chadian government has accused Sudan of supporting the rebels, and there are clear links between fighting in Chad and the ongoing conflict in Darfur. The significant flow of refugees from the Darfur conflict into eastern Chad has also had consequences for the stability of the region. In the main, interventions by the international community in Chad have been aimed at protecting these refugees, and ensuring that humanitarian assistance can be provided. These interventions have had a positive impact in stabilising the situation in eastern Chad.

The European Union operation in Chad and the Central African Republic (EUFOR Tchad/RCA) was established for a period of one year from March 2008. It played a key role in ensuring the security of refugees and displaced persons living in camps along the eastern border of Chad, and in facilitating the provision of humanitarian relief. I wish to pay tribute to the success of EUFOR and to the professionalism of the members of the Irish Defence Forces who participated in the mission, including Lieutenant General Pat Nash, the Operation Commander.

EUFOR transferred authority to the UN mission, MINURCAT, on 15 March 2009. Over 400 Irish troops are now serving with MINURCAT. The mandate of the military aspect of MINURCAT is similar to that of EUFOR. Since the UN took over responsibility it has faced a number of challenges, including the upsurge in rebel activities, and difficulties with force generation. Ireland has strongly supported the EUFOR mission from the outset, and we will continue to support MINURCAT.

Given the links between instability in Chad and the conflict in Darfur, efforts by the international community to resolve the Darfur crisis are likely, if successful, to have a positive impact on the situation in Chad. Cooperation between the governments of Sudan and Chad in addressing the causes of instability in the region is also vital, and I urge both governments to work together towards this objective. Ireland will continue to monitor the political and humanitarian situation in Chad, and support humanitarian relief efforts, to which Irish Aid has contributed more than €14.6 million since 2007.

Sports Capital Programme.

Jack Wall

Question:

152 Deputy Jack Wall asked the Minister for Arts, Sport and Tourism the funding available from the agencies or grant systems within his Department to a community based group which is seeking to provide water based sports facilities such as canoes, boats, water safety gear and so on for its community; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21930/09]

Jack Wall

Question:

153 Deputy Jack Wall asked the Minister for Arts, Sport and Tourism the grants or funding from his Department or agencies attached thereto available to a community based group which is seeking to provide water based sports facilities for its community; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21931/09]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 152 and 153 together.

Under the Sports Capital Programme, which is administered by my Department, funding is allocated towards the provision of sports facilities at national, regional and local level. Over 7,400 projects providing a range of essential sports facilities have now benefited from sports capital funding since 1998 bringing the total allocation in that time to over €725 million. No decision has been taken about the timing of future rounds of the Programme.

Decentralisation Programme.

Michael Ring

Question:

154 Deputy Michael Ring asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs if he is considering any other sites for the decentralisation of his Department (details supplied). [21909/09]

Michael Ring

Question:

155 Deputy Michael Ring asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs the plans which have been made for the decentralisation of his Department (details supplied). [21910/09]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 154 and 155 together.

As the Deputy will be aware, under the decentralisation programme my Department will relocate to Charlestown, Co. Mayo. A total of 100 staff in my Department have already relocated to interim temporary accommodation in Tubbercurry, Co. Sligo.

In relation to a permanent headquarters for the Department, OPW continue to liaise with the relevant authorities in relation to a site that has been identified in Charlestown, Co Mayo.

I should add that the Department of Finance were recently approached by a community development organisation in Kiltimagh, Co. Mayo in relation to a turn-key potential property for the headquarters of this Department in Kiltimagh and on foot of this approach, OPW will examine the property in question. I should emphasise that this is a prudent response to such an approach and implies no decision.

Housing Grants.

Michael Ring

Question:

156 Deputy Michael Ring asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs if a person (details supplied) in County Mayo will be approved and awarded the Gaeltacht house grant. [21924/09]

The grant in question has now been sanctioned and will be paid when the work has been completed to the satisfaction of my Department.

Inland Waterways.

Frank Feighan

Question:

157 Deputy Frank Feighan asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs if he will ensure new markings and signage for Waterways Ireland on the upper Shannon. [22005/09]

I am informed that Waterways Ireland conducts routine inspections of navigation markers and signage on the North Shannon, i.e. north of Lanesborough Bridge, to ensure a high level of service to waterway and facility users. There are 428 permanent navigation markers on the North Shannon. Temporary markers are also installed, as required, to mark temporary obstructions in the Navigation. During the last 12 months, 122 markers have been repainted and 14 old markers have been completely replaced (new piles and top marks). Within the last 18 months, facility location signs have been erected at each of the main amenities/facilities in the North Shannon. Further directional signage will be installed in 2009 as resources permit.

Social Welfare Benefits.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

158 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs when rent support will be offered to a person (details supplied) in County Kildare; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22011/09]

The position remains as advised in Parliamentary Question No. 317 which I answered for the Deputy on 19th May 2009. The Executive has advised that payment of rent supplement and arrears due from 1 January 2009 was made to the person concerned on 30 March 2009. Payment has also been made in respect of the months of April and May.

Social Welfare Code.

Denis Naughten

Question:

159 Deputy Denis Naughten asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the reason the first €95.23 in maintenance is taken into account for calculating rent allowance; if this discourages one parent families from declaring the father’s name and maintenance payment; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [21920/09]

The means test for the supplementary welfare allowance scheme, through which rent supplement is provided, requires that all types of household income, including maintenance payments for a lone parent and his/her children, must be taken into account in determining a person's entitlement under the scheme.

Rent supplement is normally calculated to ensure that a person, after the payment of rent, has an income equal to the rate of supplementary welfare allowance appropriate to their family circumstances less a weekly minimum contribution of €18, which recipients are required to pay from their own resources. Many recipients pay more than €18 because recipients are also required, subject to income disregards, to contribute any additional assessable means that they have over and above the appropriate basic supplementary welfare allowance rate towards their accommodation costs.

A person who claims a one-parent family payment is required to seek maintenance from her/his spouse or the other parent of the child. These maintenance payments are assessed as means for the purpose of determining entitlement to a one-parent family payment. However, vouched housing costs of up to €95.23 per week (rent or mortgage) are disregarded in establishing the rate of one-parent family payment due. Given that up to €95.23 per week of maintenance payments is disregarded in the means test for the one-parent family payment to allow for housing costs, maintenance of this amount is assessable in determining the appropriate level of rent supplement payable, as the amount of rent supplementation is based on the net amount that a person has available to meet their accommodation costs from their own resources.

Where a person has weekly maintenance payments of more than €95.23, the first €75 a week together with 25% of any additional maintenance above €75 can be disregarded for means assessment purposes. This is to ensure that the family benefits from the extra maintenance income up to that level before it affects their entitlement to rent supplement.

Overall, the means assessment rules are designed to give an incentive to lone parents to seek maintenance payments to improve their household income position, while ensuring that families in that situation have access to the appropriate levels of rent supplementation to meet their accommodation needs. The department is not aware of any evidence to suggest that these measures discourage one parent families from declaring the name of the other parent or details of maintenance payments.

Social Welfare Appeals.

Finian McGrath

Question:

160 Deputy Finian McGrath asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if she will support a person (details supplied) in Dublin 9. [21946/09]

The supplementary welfare allowance scheme, which includes mortgage interest supplement, is administered on behalf of the Department by the community welfare service of the Health Service Executive.

The person concerned was awarded a reduced rate of mortgage interest supplement based on the interest paid on his original loan application relating to his primary residence. He appealed against this decision to an Appeals Officer of the Executive but this appeal was unsuccessful. The Executive has advised that the person concerned has now appealed this decision to the Social Welfare Appeals Office (SWAO). This office will be in contact with the person concerned when a decision has been made on his appeal.

Social Welfare Benefits.

Ned O'Keeffe

Question:

161 Deputy Edward O’Keeffe asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if her attention has been drawn to the difficulties which some pensioners are experiencing in travelling to their post office to collect their State pensions as some are residing in rural areas and the only bus to the nearest town is not available on the day they can collect their pensions; and if she will arrange to have the State pension collected on a Thursday instead of a Friday for those with such difficulties. [21952/09]

The current range of payment options offered by the Department to state pension recipients include payment at a local post office or to a bank or building society account or certain credit unions that have been authorised by the banking and credit union regulators. State pension recipients can opt for a payment method having regard to their own personal circumstances.

The Department administers a variety of schemes which have a weekly and monthly payment cycle. For operational reasons, and to facilitate the distribution of payments through the post office network, each scheme is assigned a day of the week for payment. These measures ensure that payments to be distributed through post offices are spread across the week. A state pension recipient can collect their payment on the due date, Friday, or on any day of the week within 60 days thereafter.

Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin

Question:

162 Deputy Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if domiciliary care allowance will be granted to a person (details supplied) in County Cork. [21962/09]

In order to qualify for Domiciliary Care Allowance a child must have a disability so severe that he or she requires care and attention and /or supervision substantially in excess of another child of the same age. The level of care and attention required to allow the child to deal with the activities of daily living must essentially require the fulltime attention of the applicant. The child must be likely to require this level of care and attention for at least 12 months.

An application for Domiciliary Care Allowance was received by the Department on 24th April 2009. This application was referred to one of the Department's Medical Assessors who found that the child in question was not medically eligible for Domiciliary Care Allowance.

A letter issued to the person in question on 14th May 2009 where she was advised of the decision to refuse Domiciliary Care Allowance. In the case of an application which is refused on medical grounds, the applicant may submit additional information and/or ask for the case to be reviewed by a different Medical Assessor specially designated for this task. Where a person is not satisfied with the decision of a Deciding Officer they may appeal the decision to the Social Welfare Appeals Office.

Social Welfare Appeals.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

163 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs when unemployment assistance or unemployment benefit will be awarded in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Kildare; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22025/09]

A claim by the person concerned for Jobseekers Benefit was disallowed on 25 March 2009 by a Deciding Officer of the Department on the grounds that she was not genuinely seeking employment. I am advised by the Social Welfare Appeals Office that an appeal was received on 15 May 2009 together with the documentation in the case and the Deciding Officer's comments on the grounds of the appeal. These have been referred to an Appeals Officer for consideration. The Social Welfare Appeals Office is an office of the Department that is independently responsible for determining appeals against decisions on social welfare entitlements.

Social Welfare Benefits.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

164 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the reason mortgage support has been refused in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Kildare; if a full review will be undertaken in this regard; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22030/09]

The supplementary welfare allowance scheme, which includes mortgage interest supplement, is administered on behalf of the department by the community welfare division of the Health Service Executive.

The Executive has advised that the person concerned applied for mortgage interest supplement in September 2008 but her claim was refused as her total income from one-parent family payment, jobseekers benefit and maintenance payments was deemed to be sufficient to meet her mortgage interest payment. If her circumstances have changed she should contact the community welfare officer at her local health centre and renew her application for mortgage interest supplement.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

165 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if she will restore full payment of illness benefit to a person (details supplied) in County Kildare; the full entitlement for a person in such circumstances; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22031/09]

The person concerned was referred for a medical examination which was scheduled for 16/04/09. She failed to attend and her illness benefit was suspended for 4 weeks from 21/04/09. However her reason for not attending was accepted and her entitlement to payment has been restored. Illness benefit arrears of €425.00 have been issued by cheque dated 26/05/09.

This payment was calculated as follows:

From Date

To Date

Weeks/days

Weekly Rate

Amount Due

21/04/09

18/05/09

4 weeks

€117.80

€471.20

The balance of €46.20 (€471.20 less €425.00) was initially withheld to refund Supplementary Welfare Allowance payments. It subsequently came to light that these payments related to a period outside the arrears period and as such, the balance of €46.20 will be issued without delay.

The claim to illness benefit of the person concerned is from 31/07/08. Under current regulations, the rate payable depends on a person's reckonable earnings in the governing contribution year. As she had no reckonable earnings in 2006 (the contribution year governing her claim), she qualifies for the minimum graduated rate of illness benefit which is currently €117.80 (€91.80 personal rate + € 26.00 child dependant allowance rate).

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

166 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs when an increase in rent support will be offered to a person (details supplied) in County Kildare; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22033/09]

Rent supplement is administered on behalf of the Department by the community welfare division of the Health Service Executive as part of the supplementary welfare allowance scheme. The person concerned recently advised the community welfare officer of a change in her circumstances and her entitlement to rent supplement was reviewed. The Executive has indicated that the person concerned has now been advised of her new rate of rent supplement.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

167 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs when mortgage support will be offered to a person (details supplied) in County Kildare; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22037/09]

The position remains as advised in Parliamentary Question 361 which I answered for the Deputy on 28th April 2009. The Health Service Executive has advised that an application for mortgage interest supplement from the person concerned has been refused. He was notified of this decision and also advised of his right of appeal against this decision to an Appeals Officer of the Executive. The Executive has further advised that to date, no appeal has been received from the person concerned.

Social Welfare Appeals.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

168 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs when rent support will issue in the case of persons (details supplied) in County Kildare; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22041/09]

The position remains as advised in Parliamentary Question 320 which I answered for the Deputy on 12 May 2009. The Executive has advised that rent supplement was refused as total household income was deemed to be sufficient to meet the accommodation costs of the person concerned. He appealed against this decision to an Appeals Officer of the Executive but that appeal was unsuccessful. The person concerned was notified of the Appeals Officer's decision on 19 February 2009 and advised of a further right of appeal to the Chief Appeals Officer of the Department of Social and Family Affairs. No such appeal has been received to date.

Local Authority Staff.

Finian McGrath

Question:

169 Deputy Finian McGrath asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he will further clarify the case of a person (details supplied). [21914/09]

I refer to the reply to Question No. 370 of 26 May 2009. The position is unchanged.

Social and Affordable Housing.

Mary Upton

Question:

170 Deputy Mary Upton asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if legislation is in place to allow tenants in an affordable housing scheme (details supplied) in Dublin 8 go to a 100% mortgage with Dublin City Council. [21928/09]

Housing loans are provided by local authorities for households who wish to build or purchase their own home, including affordable housing purchasers and local authority tenants who wish to purchase under the tenant purchase scheme, but cannot access finance from private institutions. To ensure effective targeting of resources to support households most in need, income limits are applied, distinguishing between single and dual income households. A maximum loan limit is also applied and local authorities, in assessing loan applications, take account of the household's ability to finance the loan based on their net household income.

I recently introduced new regulations to underpin local authority lending. The Housing (Local Authority Loans) Regulations 2009 replace the previous regulations, providing for a new loan limit of €220,000 and maximum earnings of €75,000 in the case of joint applicants and €50,000 for single applicants. The previous maximum loan to value ratio of 97% still applies.

The Regulations also provide for the introduction of a formal credit policy to ensure prudence and consistency of approach for all local authority mortgage lending.

Planning Issues.

Noel Ahern

Question:

171 Deputy Noel Ahern asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he will clarify the position in relation to the previously announced decision to introduce a planning approval requirement to turn residential gardens into patios and so on; if regulations have been introduced; if not, the target date for same; if a summary of requirements will be given; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21941/09]

My Department issued Draft Guidelines to Planning Authorities on the Planning System and Flood Risk Management in Autumn 2008 for public consultation. Among the issues addressed in these draft guidelines, which are aimed at ensuring a more consistent, rigorous and systematic approach to the full incorporation of flood risk assessment and management into the planning system, was a proposal to review the exemptions from planning permission set out in the Planning and Development Regulations 2001, to provide that works involving the installation of a hard surface within the curtilage of a house will only be exempted development where they comply with sustainable drainage principles. In conjunction with the Office of Public Works, my Department is currently considering the many issues and observations raised in the submissions received on the draft Guidelines, including those relating to sustainable urban drainage and planning exemptions. I intend shortly to publish final Guidelines that will address this matter and other related issues.

Ned O'Keeffe

Question:

172 Deputy Edward O’Keeffe asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he will release documentation regarding a project application to a person (details supplied) in County Cork. [21961/09]

My Department has no record of a request for documentation relating to the project referred to. However, in the event of such a request being made, the matter will be dealt with as expeditiously as possible.

National Landscape Strategy.

Liz McManus

Question:

173 Deputy Liz McManus asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the reason for the delay in publishing a draft national landscape strategy for public consultation; the person in his Department who is preparing the NLS; the qualifications these staff have in landscape architecture, landscape management and landscape planning; the timetable he is working to, in preparing the NLS; when he will publish the final document; the further reason Ireland has not been represented consistently at the Council of Europe’s series of conferences, workshops and seminars on the European Landscape Convention; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21971/09]

My Department has established a Steering Group comprised of all key stakeholders to develop and progress a National Landscape Strategy (NLS). The aim of the (NLS) is to establish principles and provide the framework for promoting sustainable development, protecting and enhancing the landscape and positively managing its change as well as providing the context within which the design of appropriate development can take place.

The nature and content of the framework will be informed in the first instance by the Tara/Skryne Pilot Landscape Character Assessment (LCA) now underway. The pilot is being overseen by a Steering Group, chaired by Dr. Loreto Guinan, the Meath County Heritage Officer, and comprising representatives of the local authority, the Heritage Council and my Department. The project is also being part-funded by my Department and the Heritage Council.

The NLS will also be informed by the work of the Historic Landscape subgroup of the Expert Advisory Group which I established to review archaeological policy and practice in Ireland; this subgroup is chaired by Dr. Conor Newman.

Work on a draft National Landscape Strategy will be progressed over the coming months; it is not possible at this time to provide a date for publication of the final document.

Attendance by my Department at conferences, workshops and seminars is considered on a case by case basis.

Planning Issues.

Noel Ahern

Question:

174 Deputy Noel Ahern asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the position in relation to the raising of financial contributions in the case of €36,000 for three prefab buildings against a school (details supplied) in Dublin 3, a voluntary body being the school’s board of management; if, from a planning aspect, this is correctly charged; if there is a process to pursue a waiver exemption or reduction for a school or voluntary body; the process in relation to same; if it is reasonable to expect a body to fundraise for this; if planning approvals for prefab schools are always temporary; if full approval will be given; if limited five year approvals are the usual case; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21981/09]

Under section 30 of the Planning and Development Act 2000, I may not exercise any power or control in a particular case with which a planning authority or An Bord Pleanála may be concerned.

The Planning and Development Act 2000 introduced changes to the operation of the development contributions system, including the introduction of a statutory requirement that such contributions may now be levied only in accordance with a development contribution scheme drawn up by the planning authority and approved by the elected members following a public consultation process.

Section 48(3)(c) of that Act states that a development contribution scheme may allow for the payment of a reduced contribution or no contribution in certain circumstances, in accordance with the provisions of the scheme.

The adoption of development contribution schemes is a reserved function of the locally elected members of each planning authority. It is a matter for the members to determine the level of contribution and the extent, if any, of contribution waivers and the types of development to which they will apply. Details of individual development contribution schemes are available directly from each planning authority.

It is open to an applicant for planning permission to appeal a planning decision to An Bord Pleanála if the applicant considers that the terms of a development contribution scheme or supplementary development contribution scheme have not been properly applied in respect of any planning condition laid down by the planning authority.

Class 20B of the Planning and Development Regulations 2008 provides an exemption, following a grant of permission or outline permission for a permanent structure, for the use of a temporary school structure up to a maximum of 50% of the size, and up to same height, of the proposed permanent structure. This exemption is for a five year period only.

Grant Payments.

Ned O'Keeffe

Question:

175 Deputy Edward O’Keeffe asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the position regarding an application for installation aid by a person (details supplied) in County Cork. [21880/09]

Only fully completed applications made under the Young Farmers' Installation Scheme and received by my Department up to and including 14 October 2008 are being processed.

Ned O'Keeffe

Question:

176 Deputy Edward O’Keeffe asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the position regarding an application for installation aid by a person (details supplied) in County Cork. [21881/09]

Only fully completed applications made under the Young Farmers' Installation Scheme and received by my Department up to and including 14 October 2008 are being processed.

Departmental Records.

Denis Naughten

Question:

177 Deputy Denis Naughten asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the cost of compiling mart prices on a weekly basis in all centres here; the cost of travel and subsistence for the staff involved; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21929/09]

Cattle and sheep prices are collected at livestock marts by officials of my Department on a weekly basis. The prices are collected in order to (a) provide weekly reports of price data to the EU Commission in the context of the market support systems for cattle and sheep and (b) provide a basis for the on-farm valuation system which underpins the compensation regime available under the disease eradication programmes for TB, Brucellosis, Scrapie and BSE.

In view of the fact that the officials involved in the compilation of these prices undertake a range of other duties, it is difficult to give the precise cost associated with attendance at marts for price reporting purposes. However, it is estimated that the weekly cost of the latter duties is approximately €1,800, of which approximately €500 represents travel and subsistence payments.

With regard to the reporting of cattle and sheep prices to the European Commission, my Department is obliged under EU rules to collect price data on a weekly basis in order to establish average Community prices which are used by the Commission to manage the market in these sectors. With regard to the prices relevant to the valuation scheme, it is important that valuers have access to up-to-date prices for use as a reference when valuing animals removed as reactors. This arrangement was agreed with the farming representative organisations prior to the introduction of this scheme in 2002.

Farm Waste Management.

Frank Feighan

Question:

178 Deputy Frank Feighan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food when payment will issue to persons (details supplied) under the farm waste management scheme. [21933/09]

The arrangements for payment of grants under the Farm Waste Management Scheme on a phased basis have been confirmed with 40 per cent being paid this year as claims are approved. A further 40 per cent will be paid in early January 2010 and the remaining 20 per cent in January 2011. I have also announced that a special ex-gratia payment not exceeding 3.5 per cent of the value of the deferred amount will be made to farmers whose Farm Waste Management grants have been partially deferred. This payment will be made in January 2011 along with the final instalment.

My Department is currently examining the application concerned and a decision will be made as soon as possible.

Grant Payments.

Joe McHugh

Question:

179 Deputy Joe McHugh asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the timeframe as to when the funding for the meat processing sector (details supplied) will be rolled out; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21982/09]

Funding awarded under the Beef and Sheepmeat Fund for investments in the meat processing sector is being provided over a multi-annual period. In the case of eligible capital investments carried out up to 31 December 2008, grant aid will be paid out at the latest by 30 June 2010. Grant aid in respect of eligible capital investments carried out after 31 December 2008 will be paid out in the years 2011-2012.

David Stanton

Question:

180 Deputy David Stanton asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the position regarding a payment to a person (details supplied) in County Cork; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21983/09]

The file belonging to the above named cannot be processed until a reply is received to a letter issued by my officials on 24 March 2009.

Higher Education Grants.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

181 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Education and Science the number of stamp four applicants refused higher education grants and on what basis by vocational education committees in each of the past four years; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22038/09]

Under the terms of the maintenance grant schemes, grant assistance is awarded to students who meet the prescribed conditions of funding including those which relate to nationality, residency, means and previous academic attainment. The decision on eligibility for a higher education grant is a matter for the relevant local authority or VEC as appropriate.

These bodies do not collect data on the number of applicants refused a grant on the basis of Stamp 4. An individual can be refused a grant for other reasons under the nationality requirement of the Schemes.

It is the candidate's nationality or his/her immigration status in the State that determines whether or not he/she meets the nationality requirement outlined in the student grant schemes. Possession of a ‘Stamp 4' does not automatically satisfy the nationality requirement of the grant schemes.

Special Educational Needs.

Pádraic McCormack

Question:

182 Deputy Pádraic McCormack asked the Minister for Education and Science if a decision has been made on the appeal by a school (details supplied) in County Galway to retain its special class; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21874/09]

The correspondence submitted by the school referred to the Deputy in support of its appeal is currently being considered by my Department. This process is well advanced and it is expected that a decision will be conveyed to the school shortly.

Schools Building Projects.

Ruairí Quinn

Question:

183 Deputy Ruairí Quinn asked the Minister for Education and Science when he expects the new school (details supplied) in County Louth to be constructed; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21877/09]

There is on-going liaison between my Department and local authorities to establish the location, scale and pace of any major proposed developments and their possible implications for school provision.

My Department has made submissions to the Local Area Plan for the area in question, in which the land requirements for additional primary and post-primary provision were outlined, based on projected population figures provided by the Local Authority.

The delivery of any additional school facilities in the area referred to by the Deputy will be dependent upon the pace and scale of housing developments in the area. My Department will continue to monitor planned developments and population growth in the area to ensure that school accommodation needs are provided in a timely manner.

School Staffing.

Michael Ring

Question:

184 Deputy Michael Ring asked the Minister for Education and Science if a school (details supplied) in County Mayo will be retaining its teacher numbers for the 2009/2010 school year; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21911/09]

I am committed to providing information in relation to the allocation of teachers to schools and as a new feature on my Department's website. The process has begun with the provision earlier this year of initial information on the allocation of mainstream classroom teachers to primary schools under the revised schedule for 2009/10.

In terms of the position at individual primary school level the key factor for determining the level of resources provided by my Department is the pupil enrolment at 30 September 2008. The annual process of seeking this enrolment data from schools took place in the autumn and the data has since been received and processed in my Department enabling the commencement of the processes by which teaching resources are allocated to schools for the school year that begins next September.

My Department has written to the primary schools that are projected to have a net loss or gain in classroom teaching posts in September, 2009. As part of my efforts to ensure that relevant information is openly available to the public detailed information on the opening position for primary schools is now published on my Department's website. This provisional list sets out the details on individual schools that, taken collectively, are projected to gain 128 posts and to lose 382 posts — a net reduction of 254 posts. It is my intention to have this information updated and ultimately to set out the final position when the allocation processes are completed.

The final position for any one school will depend on a number of other factors such as additional posts for schools that are developing rapidly and posts allocated as a result of the appeals processes. The operation of redeployment arrangements also impacts on the final position as a teacher can remain in his or her existing school where a suitable redeployment position does not exist. The final staffing position for all schools will therefore not be known until the autumn. At that stage the allocation process will be fully completed for mainstream classroom teachers and appeals to the Staffing Appeals Board will have been considered.

Particular difficulties in relation to learning in the school referred to by the Deputy have been brought to the attention of my Department. Having considered the matter and in order to assist the school in implementing a programme to address the specific deficiencies identified an additional post will be retained by the school for the coming school year as an exceptional measure.

Furthermore the school will be supported through a plan of sustained support which will be drawn up in consultation with the Inspectorate and the Primary Professional Development Service (PPDS).

Schools Amalgamation.

Denis Naughten

Question:

185 Deputy Denis Naughten asked the Minister for Education and Science the procedure for closing a primary school into another local school; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21922/09]

The Commission on School Accommodation published two reports in September 2001; namely the Amalgamation of First Level Schools and Amalgamation of Second Level Schools. These reports present a framework of key issues and recommends detailed models for the amalgamation process together with other recommendations on dealing with amalgamations in the future. The recommendations in the report are incorporated in the best practice in dealing with amalgamation within the Department.

The Report is available on my Department's website www.education.ie.

School Transport.

Denis Naughten

Question:

186 Deputy Denis Naughten asked the Minister for Education and Science if school transport will be provided for a child (details supplied) in County Roscommon; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21923/09]

The case referred to by the Deputy, in the details supplied, is subject of an appeal to the Independent School Transport Appeals Board.

The School Transport Appeals Board is scheduled to sit on Thursday 18th June 2009. The Family will be advised of the decision thereafter.

Primary School Ownership.

Ruairí Quinn

Question:

187 Deputy Ruairí Quinn asked the Minister for Education and Science the name, address and roll number of each primary school owned by bodies (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21937/09]

As the Deputy will be aware there are in excess of 3,200 primary schools in the country, most of which are not owned by the State but rather are owned by diocesan trustees of various religions or by religious orders, including the religious orders referred to by the Deputy. These schools are privately owned and as such the information sought by the Deputy is not readily available in a format that is readily retrievable. The legal documents relating to the interest of the State in buildings constructed on sites not in the ownership of the State are generally held on individual files as distinct from a central database.

Schools Recognition.

Jack Wall

Question:

188 Deputy Jack Wall asked the Minister for Education and Science the reason a proposed school (details supplied) in County Kildare which has pre-enrolled the required number of students according to his Department’s guidelines has not been deemed as acceptable in view of the fact that the statistics for the area in question show a demand for such a school; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21953/09]

A Notification of Intention to apply for recognition of a new primary school in the Athy area has been received from the Patron Body for Educate Together.

I have recently announced a review of the procedures for the establishment of new primary schools under the Commission on School Accommodation. It is expected that the review of procedures for recognising primary schools will be completed and revised arrangements will be in place within a two year time frame.

In the interim it is not proposed to recognise any new primary schools, except in areas where the increases in pupils numbers cannot be catered for in existing schools and which require the provision of new schools. This means that new schools will not be established for reasons unrelated to demographic growth in areas where there is already sufficient school accommodation or where increases can be catered for by extending existing school accommodation.

The Forward Planning Section of my Department is in the process of identifying the areas where significant additional accommodation will be required at primary and post-primary level for future years and Athy will be included in this process.

Factors under consideration include population growth, demographic trends, current and projected enrolments, recent and planned housing developments and capacity of existing schools to meet demand for places. Having considered these factors decisions will be taken on the means by which emerging needs will be met within an area.

Special Educational Needs.

John Cregan

Question:

189 Deputy John Cregan asked the Minister for Education and Science if he will confirm if a child (details supplied) in County Limerick can remain in a special school for an additional 12 months; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21954/09]

The position is that my Department's policy in relation to the retention of pupils in primary schools is set out in Primary Circular 32/03 which issued to all primary schools in December 2003.

The primary school curriculum is designed as an eight year course, including a two year infant cycle followed by six years in standards from first to sixth, with children progressing to the next grade at the end of each school year.

My Department is providing considerable support for pupils with learning difficulties in schools. Learning support teachers, resource teachers, special needs assistants, computer equipment and a wide range of resources under the various schemes for schools in areas designated as disadvantaged are among the forms of provision allocated to schools for these pupils.

Under my Department's policy, pupils should only repeat a year for educational reasons and under no circumstances should an additional grade level (middle infants or repeat sixth class) operate through the retention of all or a substantial number of pupils for a second year at a grade level. The level of provision now available should enable pupils to make progress in keeping with their needs and abilities and to move consecutively through the different class levels in the school in keeping with their peers.

In accordance with the terms of the circular, a principal teacher should consult with the learning support teacher, class teacher and parents of a pupil and if all parties conclude that the pupil would benefit educationally by repeating a class, the pupil may be retained. However, a record outlining the educational basis for the decision to retain a pupil in a class for a second year should be kept for any pupil retained. In addition, there should be a clear programme outlined for such a pupil that records precisely what new approach will be used for her/him and what its expected benefit will be. These records should be retained within the school and should be brought to the attention of the Inspector. No pupil should repeat a grade more than once in a primary school.

School Accommodation.

Noel Ahern

Question:

190 Deputy Noel Ahern asked the Minister for Education and Science if he will clarify the position in so far as his Department is involved in relation to planning approval sought by a school (details supplied) in Dublin 3 for three new prefab classroom buildings of six classrooms in total; if local authorities always only give temporary five year approvals for prefab school buildings; if a local authority financial contribution of approximately €36,000 for three prefabs is appropriate; if such amounts are paid by his Department to school authorities; and if there is a process of waiver or reduction if schools have to fundraise for such and so on. [21980/09]

In general where a school has demonstrated a need for the provision of additional or replacement prefabricated accommodation grant-aid is provided by my Department on a devolved basis, as in the case of the school referred to by the Deputy.

I understand that where planning permission for prefabricated units is required an initial five year period of approval is generally granted by the relevant local Authority.

The matter of local authority development charges is embodied in planning legislation which comes under the remit of my colleague, the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government and accordingly is a matter between the school and the relevant Local Authority.

Higher Education Grants.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

191 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Education and Science if each vocational education committee applies different guidelines for stamp four students who have permission to work and study here; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21984/09]

It is the candidate's nationality or his/her immigration status in the State that determines whether or not he/she meets the nationality requirement outlined in the student grant schemes. Possession of a ‘stamp 4' does not automatically satisfy the nationality requirement of the grant schemes. My Department understands a ‘stamp 4' can be awarded to categories of applicants other than those specified in my Department's grant schemes.

The decision on eligibility for a maintenance grant is a matter for the relevant local authority or VEC as appropriate. It is for each VEC/local authority to determine whether the nationality/immigration status of the candidate meets the nationality requirements in the Scheme.

In order to ensure consistency of assessment practice, guidance on the provisions of the schemes is provided to the awarding authorities at the annual briefing day on the administration of the grant schemes.

Special Educational Needs.

Frank Feighan

Question:

192 Deputy Frank Feighan asked the Minister for Education and Science if he will review, revise and revert a decision in relation to a person (details supplied). [21999/09]

As the Deputy will be aware, the National Council for Special Education (NCSE) is responsible, through its network of local Special Educational Needs Organisers (SENOs), for allocating resource teachers and Special Needs Assistants (SNAs) to schools to support children with special needs. The NCSE operates within my Department's criteria in allocating such support.

Applications for SNAs may be considered by the NCSE where a pupil has a significant medical need for such assistance and where there are identified care needs arising from a diagnosed disability. A pupil's level of care may diminish over time as the child matures. Pupils may move to a different school or on to post-primary school. In such situations, the NCSE will review and adjust the SNA support required in the school. This may mean that some pupils who had previously been supported by a full time SNA may have their needs met through the shared support of an SNA or perhaps they may have no need for SNA support.

All schools have the names and contact details of their local SENO. Parents may also contact their local SENO directly to discuss their child's special educational needs, using the contact details available on www.ncse.ie.

I have arranged for the information provided by the Deputy to be forwarded to the NCSE for their direct reply.

Site Acquisitions.

Joanna Tuffy

Question:

193 Deputy Joanna Tuffy asked the Minister for Education and Science the position regarding the need for a site and new building for a school (details supplied) in County Dublin; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22001/09]

The OPW has been recently instructed to recommence negotiations up to contract stage for a site for the school. Due to commercial sensitivities attaching to site acquisitions generally, the Deputy will appreciate that I am not in a position to comment on the details of the matter. The further consideration of the proposed site acquisition and any subsequent building project for the school will be considered in the context of my Department's multi-annual school building and modernisation programme.

Schools Building Projects.

Joanna Tuffy

Question:

194 Deputy Joanna Tuffy asked the Minister for Education and Science the position regarding the need for an extension to a school (details supplied) in County Dublin; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22002/09]

My Department has built an 8 classroom building for the school to which the Deputy refers. The building, which opened in September 2008, meets the immediate accommodation requirements of the area to which the Deputy refers.

The Forward Planning Section of my Department is currently identifying the areas throughout the country where significant additional accommodation will be needed at primary and post-primary level for 2009 and onwards. This process will include an examination of the area in County Dublin where the school to which the Deputy refers is located.

Factors under consideration include population growth, demographic trends, current and projected enrolments, recent and planned housing developments and the capacity of existing schools to meet the demand for places.

Any further accommodation needs of the school concerned will be considered in this context.

Site Acquisitions.

Joanna Tuffy

Question:

195 Deputy Joanna Tuffy asked the Minister for Education and Science the position regarding the need for a site and school building for a school (details supplied) in County Dublin; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22003/09]

The acquisition of a site for the school to which the Deputy refers will be considered in the context of the capital budget available to my Department for school buildings generally. In light of current competing demands on the capital budget of my Department, it is not possible to give an indicative timeframe for the acquisition of a school site at this time.

Forward Planning Section of the Department is in the process of identifying the areas where significant additional accommodation will be required at primary and post-primary level for 2009 and onwards. Factors under consideration include population growth, demographic trends, current and projected enrolments, recent and planned housing developments and capacity of existing schools to meet demand for places.

Educational accommodation requirements in the area concerned, and any subsequent issues which may arise, will be considered in this context.

School Transport.

Jimmy Deenihan

Question:

196 Deputy Jimmy Deenihan asked the Minister for Education and Science if he will introduce some form of easy payment option for school transport charges for the 2009/2010 academic year; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22008/09]

School transport ticket invoices for the 2009/2010 School Year will be issued by Bus Eireann in July 2009. The payment options being offered to parents are as follows:

Payment of the full amount by the deadline date of 31 July 2009

Spreading the amount due over two payments payable in July and December 2009.

Parents who pay the full annual charge, in advance, will benefit from ticket(s) being issued for the full school year. This arrangement includes pupils on concessionary travel.

Parents who pay 50% of the annual amount by the deadline date of 31 July, 2009 will be issued with a ticket valid for travel up to 22 December, 2009. The balance due must be paid by 4th December, 2009. Upon receipt of this payment a second ticket valid for travel up to the end of the school year in June, 2010 will be issued.

On-line payment facilities have been introduced by Bus Éireann to make it more convenient for parents to make their payment from home, if desired. This facility is made available when ticket invoices are issued and the option to use a credit or debit card is offered.

I would highlight the fact that school transport charges have been confined to eligible post-primary children and children availing of concessionary transport. Charges continue to be waived in the case of eligible post-primary children where the family is in possession of a valid medical card. Eligible children attending primary schools and children with special needs will still travel free. A maximum family rate of €650 will also be applied.

It is not envisaged that there will be a reduction in the annual charge or a change in the payment arrangements as outlined above.

Top
Share