I would like to give my chief reason for supporting it. It is that as long as the accounts are in various names they will really be at the command rather of individuals who are responsible for these monies than at the command of the Dáil. In the past, when how to safeguard our monies was a very serious matter, this device had to be resorted to. We had to get names of stable and unstable people. Sometimes the more unstable they were the better. It will be seen there might be great danger that a person, simply because the money was in his or her name, would consider whether that money could be realised. That is the principal safeguard in this matter. Of course, we understand that from every point of view it is perfectly safe now in any Bank in the names of the Trustees owing to the circumstances—to put it briefly, owing to the signing of the Treaty— that there is no longer the danger of Banks having their offices raided and seized and closed up because they are doing business with an illegal body. The other reason that makes me in favour of the motion is, it may be said that the Trustees have a majority on the other side, but I for one do not anticipate any difficulty owing to that majority.