In concluding the debate, I should like to assure Deputies that if, by any chance, I should fail to deal now with some of the points they have raised, all the points raised in the course of the debate will be very carefully examined and considered by me afterwards, and, wherever necessary, appropriate action will be taken to deal with them. I think that the best method of dealing with the various points raised would be for me to begin where Deputies left off. Following that plan, I would say that I agree thoroughly with the observations of Deputy Giles about the necessity for having the youth of the country in the Local Defence organisation. Of course Deputy Giles realises, as I also realise, that the veterans to whom he referred were an inspiration to the young men who followed the lead of these veterans.
Probably out of hero worship, these young fellows elected these men to the responsible position of leadership of their units. It is quite possible some were not physically capable of taking on such a heavy task. As Deputies will have seen in the Press recently, the Army is considering a reorganisation, at least in the large towns and cities, of the L.D.F. Arising out of that reorganisation, it will be necessary for those persons who will have control of units to undergo a course of training in the conduct of the particular type of unit of which they will be likely to take charge—that is the administration of a company or battalion. If they fail to come, up to the standard required by the military authorities, then other individuals who have passed the course successfully will be appointed to take control. That will not mean in any way that the men who, filled these positions previously had failed to do their duty. It will merely mean that the standards which the military authorities are now seeking are much higher than had existed heretofore, and until these standards are reached by the particular individuals concerned they cannot be given the responsibility of handling such units.
I doubt very much if Deputy Giles, I, or anybody else could reduce the expenditure on the Army by a couple of millions. It is a debatable question and one man's opinion is as good as another, but personally my own feeling is that, as a very large amount of the expenditure consists of pay, the only way an which Army expenditure could be reduced would be by reducing the personnel. I do not think that Deputy Giles or anybody else would be prepared to advocate that form of economy.
Deputy Bartley raised the question of the Construction Corps in Cloosh Valley. It is true to say that a company of the Construction Corps, mainly made up of young Dublin boys, spent last summer in the Cloosh Valley, doing what. I believe, was very useful work. They have constructed a road in the valley which, in my opinion, will be a monument to their energy and their efforts during the period they were there. The road is excellent. It has been built over wild mountain bogland and it will be there for the future use of the people of the valley. A peculiar feature is that I had complaints from a number of people to the effect that these boys were in effect exiles from their native city. It was represented that the city was too far away from where they were stationed and I was asked to arrange for their return. I brought these representations to the attention of the military authorities, but the extraordinary feature about it is that these boys themselves signed a petition to the officer commanding the unit asking to have them left there for some longer period. They named a certain date. As a matter of fact, I was anxious to get them out of it at the beginning of November. I thought it desirable to have them out of that particular atmosphere by that time of the year, but they signed a petition asking to be left there and I could only assume therefore that the boys were happy. With regard to the Deputy's point about the boat, I shall have that examined with a view to seeing what the position is. We are having some difficulty in regard to that particular type of vessel.
Deputy Linehan raised the question of the purchase by civilians of Army property from soldiers. We are, at the present moment, drafting an Order to meet that, because we believe that many of those petty thefts which are taking place in the Army at the present could not possibly take place but for the fact that there is outside a mean type of receiver who is prepared to pay a ridiculous price for some piece of valuable property such as the cape described by Deputy Linehan, and we want to get after that type of receiver. If we get this particular type of Order through, we will be in a position to get after the receivers and punish them as severely as it is possible to do in the circumstances.
Deputy Linehan also deplored the fact that the selection of military officers for the L.D.F. was made by what he described, I think, as the Ministry of Defence, possibly meaning myself. I do not want to misrepresent him by saying that that was what he meant; he may have had something else in his mind. I want to assure the Deputy and any other Deputies who may have similar ideas in their minds that the selection of such officers is made solely by the military authorities, the General Headquarters Staff of the Army; that they are selected for their efficiency and their ability, and with no recognition, good, bad or indifferent, of what their former political leanings may have been. I presume that the types of officer the Deputy was referring to are temporary officers. I have had representations from some areas about officers who were described to me as Blueshirts being selected and put in charge of the Local Defence organisation, but the fact remains that they were selected by the military authorities, as were officers who were formerly in some way or other regarded as being connected with the Fianna Fáil organisation. I did not interest myself in those affairs. It is the responsibility of the military; if they no not do their job properly, I will get after them to discover why. If I were to interest myself in those matters it would be quite impossible for me to bring the Army authorities to book for any failure that might be brought to my attention, such as the failure of the unit to which those people might be sent.
I am afraid I have to disagree with Deputy Mullen in respect to the desirability of having Deputies of this House closely connected with the L.D.F. I myself saw what I believed to be a danger of that in the beginning, and I was responsible for the Order that all Deputies would have to sever their connection with the L.D.F. I believe it had a beneficial result. Some Deputies endeavoured to prove to me that it was the reverse. All I can say is that they are entitled to their opinion, but I am still prepared to differ with them; I feel that they can do very much more valuable work by endeavouring to induce young men to get into the force rather than by being themselves members of it. I think Deputy Esmonde expressed a similar opinion, and a similar reply fits his case too.
Several Deputies referred to the granting of leave to Army personnel. It may be desirable for me to explain just what the position is in respect of the type of leave which we afford to members of the Army. In the first place we established last year what we described as "agricultural leave". We gave agricultural leave to various soldiers in the spring for the purpose of helping in the preparation of the land. I think the period allotted to the individual soldier was something in the nature of a month or six weeks. We gave a similar period in the autumn for the purpose of collecting the harvest. A soldier desiring to secure agricultural leave should apply to his commanding officer. The delay to which some Deputies referred in respect to a particular soldier making that application was due, I believe, to the fact that, instead of making application to the commanding officer, it was made to a Deputy, believing that the Deputy could expedite it by getting after me or someone else.
The fact remains that, however anxious I might be to expedite that leave, the application still has to go to the commanding officer, and the commanding officer has to make certain investigations in respect to it. We all know that there are individuals who would be only too anxious to take advantage of getting out of the Army even for a month, and we have to ensure against that sort of thing. The result is that, when an application for agricultural leave is made, the Army authorities apply to the Gárda authorities to discover whether the statement made by the individual is correct. If the statement is correct, there is no delay in granting the leave asked for. If, on the other hand, it is found that the statement is a fiction, then the leave is not granted. The other type of leave, is called indefinite leave. A man who is fully trained, and who makes application for indefinite leave, will have his case examined. If the authorities are satisfied that indefinite leave can be granted to that man, it will be granted, on the understanding that his services are there to be called on in time of emergency.