Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 3 Mar 1965

Vol. 214 No. 9

Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Electricity Supply to Dublin Barracks.

16.

Mr. Ryan

asked the Minister for Defence why the Army when installing a new electrical system in married quarters, Cathal Brugha Barracks, Dublin last year failed to provide a system which would permit ordinary domestic appliances to be used; and if, having regard to the hardship imposed on soldiers' wives by the prohibition against the use of washing machines, clothes driers, electric fires, cookers and other equipment, he will now have a proper electrical system in keeping with modern standards installed.

17.

Mr. Ryan

asked the Minister for Defence the average consumption of electricity in married quarters in Cathal Brugha Barracks, Dublin (a) before and (b) after the installation of the new electrical system there.

18.

Mr. Ryan

asked the Minister for Defence who carries out the two-monthly meter readings in married quarters in Cathal Brugha Barracks, Dublin; and why tenants are not notified of the number of units which they are reckoned to have used.

19.

Mr. Ryan

asked the Minister for Defence if he will state in respect of the wiring renewed, meters fitted and other electrical work done in married quarters, Cathal Brugha Barracks, Dublin, the cost of the work and materials, the time employed in doing it and the number of homes served.

20.

Mr. Ryan

asked the Minister for Defence if he will state the estimated cost of now providing in the married quarters, Cathal Brugha Barracks, Dublin, an electrical system to cater for lighting and domestic appliances.

21.

Mr. Ryan

asked the Minister for Defence if he will state the difference in the cost of recently installing the lighting up electrical system in Cathal Brugha Barracks and the estimated cost of installing a lighting and domestic appliances system in its stead at the time.

Le do cheadsa, a Cheann Comhairle, freagród Ceisteanna Uimhreacha a 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 maraon.

Prior to 1st May, 1964, married quarters for other ranks generally were provided with free light and the charge for the quarters was 5/- per week. As from that date electricity was charged for at the same rates as charged by the ESB in the area. To allow for this the charge for the quarters was reduced from 5/- per week to 3/- per week.

When the meters were installed and where the supply lines were sufficient, the occupants of married quarters were permitted to use appliances in addition to light. In some cases, as in Cathal Brugha Barracks, it was necessary to renew the wiring to the quarters as the existing supply lines were old and not capable of carrying any extra demand. The internal wiring which was for lighting only was renewed where necessary. The Department does not install wiring other than for lighting but if the occupants desire to use other appliances and the power lines are sufficient, wiring for them may be carried out on a repayment basis. The provision of the appliances is in all cases a matter for the occupants themselves.

The renewal of the wiring in Cathal Brugha Barracks commenced in December 1963 and was completed in March 1964 at a total cost of £2,370, including the cost of the supply lines to the individual quarters. As wiring other than for lighting was not being installed by the Department, an estimate of cost was not made at the time the lighting circuits were being renewed in Cathal Brugha Barracks and it is not now proposed to make such an estimate.

It is not possible to give the average consumption for lighting in quarters prior to the installation of the meters. Since 1st May, 1964, the average consumption of electricity per two-monthly period was 149 units per quarters.

Electricity meters in married quarters in Cathal Brugha Barracks, Dublin, are read by an Oifigeach Neamhchoimisiúnta of Na Buan Óglaigh in the presence of the occupants of the quarters or members of their households. The readings are available for those persons on the spot if they request them.

Does the Minister seriously say it is not intended to make electricity available for cooking purposes and for heating in the married quarters in Cathal Brugha Barracks except at the expense of the members of the Defence Forces actually occupying these quarters?

Yes, I think that is the meaning of the reply.

Is that reasonable in the Minister's judgment? If you move into a flat in Dublin or take a bedsitter in a house in Dublin, surely the first thing you ask is if there is a power plug in the room? For a woman with a family, trying to cook, dry clothes and so forth, does the Minister not think it reasonable a power plug should be made available to her in her married quarters?

The answer is that the Army renewed the service on the basis on which it already existed before renewal; in other words, no additional electricity amenities were supplied. The occupants of these quarters are now directly responsible for their electricity consumption.

Surely, if the Minister is responsible for the married quarters in which married members of the armed forces live, and responsible for seeing that reasonable amenities are provided in them, he should do something to alleviate the present position? I know the reluctance of the Department to change the established situation but this is 1965. Cathal Brugha Barracks were built in the 19th century. Surely the Minister would assume responsibility for giving a direction that power points should be provided in the married quarters in this barracks and the people in them should not be required to continue living on the basis of 19th century accommodation.

That is reasonable enough, I agree, but a much larger question in relation to married quarters may be involved.

It might make them too comfortable.

It is no use being cynical about it.

Surely the Minister could exercise his powers as Minister and say that, whatever regulations or rules exist, in his judgement, no undesirable precedent will be established by laying it down that a power plug must be installed in married quarters. No one in Dáil Éireann would object.

The Minister would not object, but some of the people who give orders would.

I will have the Deputy's comments considered as favourably as possible.

It would be better to put in a plug and not bother about the consideration.

Questions Nos. 22, 23 and 24 postponed.

Barr
Roinn