Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 4 May 1966

Vol. 222 No. 7

Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - County Galway Land Allotments.

14.

asked the Minister for Lands if the policy of the Land Commission of late, as operated by the Land Commission Office, Galway, is to grant the tenants with the highest valuation adjoining an estate the greatest additions of land and those with small valuations and small holdings very small additions or none at all, as happened in the division of the former holding of Mr. Eddie Loughnane, Ballyara, Menlough, Ballinasloe, County Galway, and other similar holdings which were recently divided in East Galway.

15.

asked the Minister for Lands if he will state, as regards the division of the former holding of Mr. Eddie Loughnane, Ballyara, Menlough, Ballinasloe, County Galway, by the Land Commission, the names of the allottees granted additions, the land valuations of each allottee prior to the division, and the Land Commission estimate of the value of the allotment granted to each of the allottees.

16.

asked the Minister for Lands if he will state, as regards the division of the former holding of Mr. Eddie Loughnane, Ballyara, Menlough, Ballinasloe, County Galway, by the Land Commission, why two of the tenants adjoining the estate, namely Mrs. Mary Fahey and Tom Bellew, did not get additions even though their valuations were much smaller than those of other tenants who got substantial divisions on this holding.

With your permission, a Cheann Comhairle, I propose to take Questions Nos. 14, 15 and 16 together.

The selection of allottees is a function exclusively reserved to the Commissioners. I have ascertained from the Land Commission that applications on behalf of Mrs. Mary Fahey and Mr. T. Bellew were fully considered by the Commissioners in competition with other applications received but that, having regard to the acreage available for disposal and other considerations, it was not possible to provide them with allotments.

Under current policy, holdings and enlargements are planned to provide family farms of 40 to 45 acres of good land or the equivalent in land of mixed quality. Where, however, the acreage available for distribution is insufficient to bring all the qualified and genuinely deserving smallholders within the prescribed distance up to the optimum level of 40 to 45 acres, the land is distributed in a fair and reasonable manner amongst as many of such qualified smallholders as is practicable. All other things being equal, preference is given to married applicants with families. In this connection, I might add that in the division of the Loughnane Estate—containing 89 acres with a rateable valuation of £38—it was not practicable to bring any of the eight smallholders who received allotments, and all of whom are married with families, up to the optimum standard. I should say, too, that rateable valuation is by no means the sole determining factor in the selection of allottees. Other considerations such as farming competence, marital status, family circumstances etc. must and are also taken into the reckoning.

The remaining particulars are in the form of a tabular statement which, with your permission, a Cheann Comhairle, will be circulated with the Official Report. As I have often mentioned before, there is, of course, no secrecy regarding the identity of allottees—but I feel very strongly that there should be the least possible invasion of the affairs of private individuals, even when they are the recipients of allotments of land.

Following is the statement:—

Name of Allottee

Rateable Valuation of Existing Holding

Area of Addition

£

s.

(Acres)

James Ruane

22

7

13

Elizabeth Lally

21

10

6

Patrick Ryan

17

16

6

Laurence Mannion

22

15

19

John McElwain

21

1

6

Michael Killeen

22

5

8

John Collins

27

3

21

Michael Loughnane

25

10

8

Galway County Council

2 (road widening)

NOTE: The quality of the divided land varies from fairly good arable to inferior grazing. Most of the lower quality land is included in the two allotments biggest in area; the average value per acre of these two allotments is estimated to be about 40 per cent. of the average value per acre of the other allotments.

Is the Minister aware that the unjust division of this estate stinks in the nostrils of every fairminded man and woman in this locality and that all faith in the Land Commission has been lost in that area? Is he further aware that a man with a valuation of £27, the highest valuation adjoining the estate, gets 21 acres, whereas a married man with the lowest valuation of £17 16s. gets less than six acres? That is the priority in these cases. The people with the second lowest valuations, Mrs. Mary Fahey and Tom Bellew, got nothing at all. She is a widow and had land taken on this estate from the former owner and from the Land Commission since they acquired it. Now they have evicted her and another widow was brought in and planted in front of her door. Is the Minister further aware that I and colleagues of mine made representations to him, to the two Land Commissioners, to the Secretary of the Land Commission, to the Chief Inspector and to the Deputy Chief Inspector and that I got no satisfaction from any of them? Will the Minister now, even at this stage, have a thorough investigation into the unjust division of this estate and, if necessary, a sworn inquiry?

The question of the division of land is reserved by law to the Land Commissioners. I am aware of the representations made by the Deputy and others in connection with this estate. The Land Commission whose job it is to distribute this small amount of land have taken all the circumstances of the various applicants into consideration. The people who got the largest acreage on this estate got substandard land. Most of the lower quality land is included in the two largest allotments given to the successful applicants. I am aware from the files of the two individuals about whom the Deputy complains who were left out of this scheme. It is true that one of them, as mentioned by the Deputy, Mrs. Mary Fahey, is a widow aged 74 who has a single son who, I understand, is aged 47.

And a married son with three in the family.

The other person, Mr. Bellew, is a bachelor aged 42 who has no dependants. At all events, the other confidential information about the different applicants on this file should not be disclosed by me. It never has been and I do not intend to break that precedent.

Is it permissible for a Land Commission inspector to abuse an applicant when he goes to investigate her claim because she holds a certain political opinion? Because Mrs. Fahey thanked Mr. de Valera for halving her land annuities, he walked out and subsequently victimised her and brought in a widow who is a prominent Fine Gael supporter. Further-more, is the Minister aware that the man who got the 21 acres is secretary of the local Fine Gael cumann? In view of the unsatisfactory nature of the Minister's reply, I wish to give notice that I intend to raise the matter tonight on the Adjournment.

More luck to John Donnellan and——

All I have to say is that if any complaint is made by the Deputy about the misbehaviour of any Land Commission official, or if there is any question of any Land Commission official abusing any applicant, then, if I get particulars, I shall have the matter fully investigated.

I shall give he Minister the particulars if I am allowed to raise the matter on the Adjournment.

I shall communicate with the Deputy.

Barr
Roinn