Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 23 Nov 1966

Vol. 225 No. 9

Export Promotion (Amendment) Bill, 1966: Second Stage.

I move that the Bill be now read a Second Time.

The first and most important aim of the Bill is to make provision for further grants to Córas Tráchtála to enable it to continue its work of promoting Irish exports. The Export Promotion Act, 1959, under which Córas Tráchtála was established, limited the total amount of grants to which the Board was entitled to £1 million. The amending Act of 1963 increased this sum to £2,500,000. By the end of the last financial year, grants made to the Board had amounted to £2,081,000, leaving a balance of £419,000 which is not sufficient to meet its requirements for the year at the existing rate of expenditure. This Bill proposes to raise the limit to £4,500,000. In recommending that provision be made for an additional sum of £2 million, I am having regard to the part Córas Tráchtála are expected to play in the promotion of exports over the next few years and particularly to the fact that the development of the Irish economy depends to a great extent on the achievement of increased exports.

I have no doubt that the House appreciates the excellent contribution Córas Tráchtála has made to the expansion of exports in recent years and that it will agree that the future of the organisation should be secured by ensuring sufficient funds to enable it to continue its work for the development of exports.

In 1960 Córas Tráchtála was entrusted with the task of promoting and assisting improvement in the standard of design in Irish industry as part of its general responsibility for promoting, assisting and developing exports and the Board have instituted various schemes for helping manufacturers and exporters to improve their designs. In 1963 Córas Tráchtála set up Kilkenny Design Workshops, Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary, operating a number of design workshops for the production of well-designed prototypes for industry. The work being done in Kilkenny is already proving to be of value to Irish industry not alone in export markets but also in the home market. The Bill will make it clear that the statutory powers and functions of Córas Tráchtála include the promotion and assistance of improvement in the standard of industrial design whether for home or for export purposes.

It is also proposed to give Córas Tráchtála power to borrow for capital expenditure. The immediate purpose of this proposal is to enable the Board to borrow the amount required to cover the capital expenditure on Ireland House, London. In addition, under existing legislation the Board has power to dispose of premises or portions of premises not required for their own use. The Bill gives power to the Board to alter premises in order to facilitate their disposal. This will remove doubts entertained regarding the Board's legal power to alter premises to facilitate their disposal by way of letting or otherwise.

Apart from the major proposal in the Bill to provide an additional £2 million for Córas Tráchtála, the Bill is largely a tidying-up measure. I recommend it to the House.

There is general recognition that Córas Tráchtála have made a significant contribution to the promotion and expansion of exports. In considering the work which Córas Tráchtála have done, it is no harm to reflect on the initial consideration of this matter which was undertaken by a committee established by Mr. Dan Morrissey, when he was Minister for Industry and Commerce. As a result of the examination of the situation by that committee, a recommendation was made that an export board be established. That board was subsequently set up by legislation introduced by Deputy Seán Lemass, when he was Minister.

Originally, the purpose of establishing the committee to examine the question was undertaken because of the general recognition that more concentrated effort would require to be made to develop exports to the dollar area. When Marshall Aid assistance was being provided here, the American authorities were concerned that some permanent machinery should be established so that after the initial impetus which the economy secured from the granting of Marshall Aid had ended, definite and permanent measures would be operated in order to develop and expand exports to the dollar area. When the committee representing the different interests, under the chairmanship of the then Secretary of the Department of Industry and Commerce, Mr. John Leydon, considered this, increased dollar earnings were naturally uppermost in their minds. After the establishment of Córas Tráchtála, it was obvious that possibilities existed for extending the work of the Board to areas outside the dollar area and at a later stage offices were established and promotional activities were extended to Britain and other non-dollar areas.

The success which has been achieved is quite significant but in considering the present measure, we should be concerned to examine from time to time the general development and encouragement of exports from the point of view of the economy. In that respect, the Irish Exporters' Association, as well as other interested bodies, conducted certain investigations and it appears that one of the significant factors which emerges from an examination of the export statistics is the relatively small number of firms which, as a matter of policy, get into the export trade. An analysis of the volume of exports indicates that relatively few firms account for a large proportion of the trade. This aspect of the matter has caused concern about the possibility of extending and increasing the number of firms which are interested in, and as a conscious decision of policy decide to gear themselves for, the export business. The negotiating of the Agreement with Britain last year—and the ultimate possibility of an agreement with the EEC—must bring home to those firms which have not yet determined to endeavour to secure markets abroad that the effect of competition arising from this Agreement on the home market will naturally limit the possibilities and the scope of development here, and consequently must involve a reconsideration of export possibilities.

I do not know whether the Minister's Department or Córas Tráchtála, or both together, have from time to time examined, in the light of the Trade Agreement with Britain, and the possibility of another agreement with the EEC, what further outlets are available for Irish goods, or whether any consideration is being given to extending the relatively narrow range of goods for export. This, of course, depends not merely on assistance from Córas Tráchtála, or on the various grants provided under the different Acts which enable financial and tax and other incentives to be provided in respect of exports, but in the last analysis it depends also on the representatives either of the firms themselves or of the associations which represent particular groups of manufacturers. However actively, energetically and systematically a State company, or even a State Department, may negotiate or arrange either agreements or promotional activities of one sort or another, the ultimate responsibility for selling the particular commodity or commodities depends on the individual representatives of the firm concerned. One of the most frequent criticisms that have been expressed in respect of firms—or some of them, at any rate—manufacturing goods and selling them on export markets is that too often an initial consignment or sample may be of the required standards but when subsequent orders are sought, either the goods are not produced in sufficient quantity or they fail to measure up to the initial quality or standard which was responsible for securing the order or of evoking the interest of customers outside.

Last year I visited the Kilkenny Workshops and it was interesting to see some of the work being done there. On the other hand, the actual financial returns from the operation of the workshop showed that so far the development has not proved financially successful. I should be interested to hear from the Minister to what extent the work being undertaken there is being availed of, or is securing the interest of manufacturers and traders here. In this regard I feel that the assistance which is being provided and the work carried out by the Institute for Industrial Research and Standards may be of help. In so far as the increased financial assistance it is proposed to provide, by increasing the maximum amount of money which may be made available to the Board under section 2, offers a prospect of work being continued, then I believe there will be general acceptance of it.

At the same time, it is important, in view of the present trading position and the effect which external factors, particularly such factors as the British import levy, may have had on our trade, that we should be ever-conscious of the continuing need for the most energetic efforts by all concerned to ensure that we not only maintain our existing foothold in markets abroad but that more strenuous efforts are made by State bodies as well as by individual companies and firms to extend and develop the size of our export potential and the range and type of goods offered for sale. Like any other country in present world trading conditions we depend on our skill and ability and capacity to sell in competition with exporters and manufacturers not merely in Britain but in Europe. That involves sustained and continuous effort at all levels and in every field of industrial enterprise.

I suppose it is true that the work of Córas Tráchtála is particularly important because of the necessity to try to keep our balance of payments right. If Córas Tráchtála can get markets for Irish materials and so bring in foreign currency, it helps immeasurably. But are they doing that? Are they doing what they were set up to do? The fact that recently we have been told that a mining concern which was set up a few years ago here—there are now two mines under the same company— hopes, within 12 or 18 months, to export ore to the value of almost the entire amount received from the cattle trade, shows that individuals who set out to get what they want, do in fact get a market for their goods. I am sure that if these people had started a mine and had said they would expect some Government organisation to find a market for them, they would have the ore heaped up around the face of the mine and there would be very little export. But they went to the Continent and made the necessary arrangements with people who can take the ore from them, with the result that they got a guarantee for the entire life of the mine for their exports.

We know that is not what happens when the export of materials manufactured here comes up for consideration because, as Deputy Cosgrave has said, we find that one or two things happen. Either a material of excellent quality is produced and a market found for it but the problem of keeping up supplies apparently has not been investigated and in a short time we find that market, or most of it, can be lost because manufacturers cannot maintain the supplies necessary to keep it and supplies have to be sought elsewhere. Alternatively, the goods are manufactured here and there is no export market for them. To give an example of the first, we can take peat briquettes. We know that a tremendous amount of them can be exported but we cannot supply them. We have not got them and we cannot, therefore, retain the export market which was found for them with the assistance of Córas Tráchtála. Peat moss is another example. It should be possible to keep up the supplies of peat moss but despite the fact that in my own constituency a factory was set up with a great blaring of trumpets some years ago—God knows how many Ministers' cars were outside for the opening—it lasted only about 18 months and then closed down. It has been closed for two or three years because the market was found but the material could not be supplied.

That is one side of the story. The other side is that of people manufacturing with State assistance a certain article and apparently no attempt is made to find whether there is an export market for it. A typical example is what happened in Dundalk when the electrical works closed down there. They closed, in fact, on the evening before they officially opened because neither Córas Tráchtála nor anybody else went to the trouble of finding out if there was a market for the goods they were about to produce. When they were ready to go into production, it was found that the places where they expected to be able to sell their products in Britain were already saturated by similar goods from similar types of factory very much nearer the market.

This is something Córas Tráchtála will have to do its homework about. It is something into which they must go very much deeper and ensure that if they find a good market, the supply can be maintained. Before encouraging anybody to start manufacturing on a big scale here, we must try to ensure that a guaranteed market is available. I am quite sure our friends in the mining business know that a market can be found if we go to the trouble of looking for it.

I travel a good deal and it is extraordinary the number of countries to which one goes where Ireland was never heard of and nothing manufactured in Ireland ever seems to have arrived there. We have quite interesting products which could possibly find sale in some of these countries if properly pushed but they have never been heard of. They may be short of certain goods which we make and could sell to them. Nobody seems to worry that our trade could be directed to these countries. I do not have to be told that costs of transport and other factors arise, but if we are selling butter to Kuwait with 3/8d. per pound subsidy, surely we could make some attempt to find something that would sell abroad and which would not need such a subsidy? We must look into this seriously.

There is also the question of selling truly Irish materials abroad. The Institute for Industrial Research and Standards have been helping out in this matter and a number of firms, particularly furniture firms, have been attempting to make progress in this sphere. They have been making a great success with Irish designs. This should get a little more attention from Córas Tráchtála. A few years ago a furniture manufacturer from my own constituency went to France and not only did he get an order for a very substantial quantity of furniture but he succeeded in getting from the French Government an order for chairs for the French Parliament. If that could be done by a private individual, I see no reason why a Government-sponsored body should not be able to try to break into new markets and try to sell or popularise what we are making here.

There has been comment on another matter. This is something that certain people do not like while others seem to think there is a lot in it. Personally, I believe there is cause for complaint. When we have established embassies abroad, they should have nothing but Irish furniture in them. All furnishing and materials there and any other materials used there should, as far as possible, be Irish. I am a Pioneer—I mentioned this before—but I have had the experience of going to our embassies abroad and finding that nobody ever heard tell of Irish whiskey. Scotch was produced for those who wanted whiskey but Irish was not produced. It is a shame, and if we are manufacturing things which could be sold abroad, it is our job to push them.

I know the Minister who is comparatively new to the Department may have some difficulty in getting everything done which he would like to see done, and I am quite sure he is an energetic young man who will be sincere enough to try to have the things which should be done tackled. When it comes to voting in this House a certain amount of money which is to be expended in the same way as it has been expended over the years, doing a little good but missing out an awful lot of good things, I do not think the job is being properly done.

Deputy Cosgrave referred to the EEC and to our Trade Agreement with Britain. The Trade Agreement with Britain is one of the things which have caused our manufacturers here a lot more difficulty than they had up to July of this year. No matter what we may say about free trade—and we hear people talking about preparing for it and how necessary it is to prepare for it—I only hope that when the day comes when Britain goes into the EEC, and therefore we must go in, we shall have some industries which will survive. I gravely doubt it, from my own experience. I am quite sure the EEC do not want the type of industries we have here, small industries. They believe they can manufacture in a very big factory enough commodities of any kind to supply perhaps the whole EEC and that encouraging small industries is simply a matter of adding extra cost. We should be prepared to find markets elsewhere in case something like that happens, and I would appeal to the Minister to direct Córas Tráchtála to go after new markets. Existing markets where we have them at the present time are all right if we can get the amount of material required and if we can fill the orders, but if we have a tie-up with the EEC, we could find ourselves in a precarious position overnight.

Some years ago a man succeeded in getting an order for a certain type of brick which could not be got in Britain. He got an order for the manufacture of it here for export to Britain. When he suggested it to a number of firms and to Córas Tráchtála, he was told: "It does not make sense. You cannot make bricks here and send them across; the weight of them and everything else is very much against it. You just cannot do it". Three years later the Sunday papers had a headline where somebody else had suddenly decided that this could be done, and the job is being done. I know the Minister will meet people with crackpot ideas as to how things should be done. There should be somebody in his Department who would give the necessary attention to investigating ideas for such things which will come in by the dozen to him, and not have a blanket condemnation of everything so that some idea which could be very useful would be thrown overboard.

The Leader of our Party, Deputy Cosgrave, has paid tribute to the efforts of Córas Tráchtála in developing new markets and new fields. I feel it my duty to join with him in the tribute paid to this organisation which is doing its best and has been doing its best since its formation. It is to the credit of Córas Tráchtála that it has shown imagination and has succeeded in expanding industry. However, it is not the success I would expect it to be and to this extent I must be critical. I feel obliged to say that the personnel of many of these organisations are not the type of personnel suitable for the purpose or qualified to go out and seek markets and having got them, experienced enough to know what it is to hold them because many of them have not business training.

I say that as one who had a business training and who was engaged in the export business long before Córas Tráchtála was thought of. The family business to which I belong and in which I was trained engaged in the export business before I was born. They exported from the North Wall and various other Irish ports. As a young lad, I worked in the stores where goods were being packed and prepared for export. Long before regulations came in about high standards, we were taught by my late father, God be good to him, that nothing was too good for the customer, and the customer in that case was across the water in England and in this city as well. One need only go to the Department of Agriculture or to the Minister's own Department to find the records of those exports. People who have experience in that field may not have gone through universities; they may not be BAs, BLs or B.Comms., but because of their training and experience they are well qualified to say what is good and what is bad. That was my training right from the packaging place to the place of export, the North Wall and the other ports at Sligo, the less important port of Ballina, and Galway and Westport. Some of these ports are now closed down. The bulk of the exports was from the land of Ireland, agricultural produce of one kind or another.

I am reminded of Deputy Tully's reference to mining. Minerals were exported from Mayo through the port of Killala 80 or 90 years ago. They were exported from there in the raw, not processed. At one time—I do not want to go into detail on this matter because I could be accused of playing politics— we enjoyed certain preferences in the British market. These advantages were thrown away, a retrograde step when we consider our geographical situation, how near we are to the greatest market in the world, the British market, from the point of view of our economy. As long as I can remember, we have been throwing away very good and very valuable markets. We have been trying to convince ourselves that there was something in Germany, something in Spain and something in France that was far better than what was across the water in England. I suggest to the Minister that if he checks the facts and figures that are there available to him —not just the niggardly exports or imports that my late father and I might have engaged in but the overall position—he will learn something from them. The records are in the files of the Department and he can learn a great deal from them.

The Minister has had the experience of going to England, America and certain European countries. The thought must have struck him from time to time that in heavily industrialised cities such as London, Birmingham, Manchester, the potential is there for us if only we were up and doing and minding our business. When walking through the streets of London, Birmingham or Manchester, as I have done as a businessman, looking around to see if there was Irish produce in the shops there and failing to see it, he must have formed the same opinion as I have formed, that there is something terribly and damnably wrong with us and that we have a good deal for which to blame ourselves. Instead of having persons who understood what they were doing and what they were talking about at the head of affairs, frequently we had alleged experts from foreign countries, who were invited to tell us how to do things and the opinions of our own people were never really valued. You will find today, no doubt, engaged in export activity, people who came in here, not for the love of our blue eyes or the colour of our hair, but because there were grants available to them. They came from Europe and, perhaps, from the United States. I am not condemning them all. Some of them, no doubt, are decent and reputable people. Amongst them were the chancers and the Johnny-get-rich-quick type, who had their hands out for grants and, if it suited them at a later date, were ready to fold their tents and get out. That has gone on, to my knowledge.

I was not very old when I employed about 20 people and there was no need for a trade union around the place. I paid the trade union rates in a country area and provided every modern amenity. If I as a private individual were afforded the opportunities that some of these foreigners got, I would have a couple of hundred people employed now, without having the B.Comm. or any other degree, but having been trained in the hard school of experience, in a business handed down in which I was directly interested and was anxious to foster because it was a family business in which one was reared and trained and in which one was an expert.

We seem to be prepared to go to the four corners of the earth for men and women with high-sounding names and to meet them at the airport or the dockside and welcome them and, with the Irish taxpayer's money, hand out generous grants, in many cases to very doubtful and very shady individuals. I could go on and on on that subject.

I know the foolish policy that was adopted, that we could get on without the British market, the foolish policy of starting economic and other wars and the cheap talk that went on. I know the amount of damage it did and how it prejudiced the British consumer against us.

It may surprise the Minister when I tell him that, on one occasion when Dr. Ryan was Minister for Agriculture and went to No. 10 Downing Street and the late Winston Churchill was in a room adjacent to No. 10 the very words that Winston Churchill used were: "Get as much as you can as cheap as you can from those Irish". He did not bother to meet the deputation. He knew that we had not any other market, that we were bad businessmen, that we were throwing away the markets that were there for us to foster if only we had the commonsense to do it. I do not misquote the man. I know this from the man who stood beside him at the time, who was very pro-Irish and married to an Irish girl.

We have been throwing away these markets. A lot of water has flowed under the bridge down through the years and a great deal of damage has been done. To the credit of Córas Tráchtála, many of whom are not trained business people at all, I must say that they have been trying as best they can to restore our position in some of these markets and they have found it very difficult to do so.

Traditionally, we sent the bulk of our exports to Glasgow and exported, to a smaller degree, to London and to Manchester. Many of the older people remember when millions of pounds worth of Irish goods were landed at the Nelson docks and other docks in London and Scotland. Such quantities of goods are no longer being landed at these ports today. I say, without fear of contradiction, that that is due to the fact that we are very bad business people and were not minding our business when we had the opportunity to do so. The war did not affect us adversely. We gained when the bombs were raining down on Birmingham, London and other English cities. We had the produce they needed. Unfortunately, as has often happened before—I do not like going on the record as saying this—a few disreputable people engaged in business at that time were prepared, just because the British were in need of goods at that time, to put anything into old sacks or bags and ship it across and take money for it and to destroy our reputaion.

It became necessary to have an organisation such as Córas Tráchtála, to have registration, to have some tabs on the type of exporter who engaged in business. Personally, I feel that free trade is the most desirable thing we can have. There is the businessman who is prepared to get up in the early hours of the morning, to look for markets and, having got them, is prepared to hold on to them because his very livelihood is involved, but it is necessary to establish bodies such as Córas Tráchtála in order to establish some sort of control and to maintain the highest possible standards for people who are prepared to pay a good price for a good article.

It should be borne in mind that there is no country in which we have so much goodwill among our own people as we have in England. Our own kith and kin are there, our own brothers and sisters, uncles and aunts. In cities such as Liverpool and Manchester, the majority of the people one meets on the street are Irish or of Irish descent. They are prepared to buy our goods, provided we offer them an honest article and a continuous supply. There is no use in saying that there will be a thousand rugs coming from Foxford if they are not delivered on time.

Having mentioned rugs and woollen goods, I put it on the record in recent times that an industry started in Foxford a long time ago. It is publicly known that it was the old Congested Districts Board that financed a nun there to start a mill. That mill has been successful down through the years. The business has been carried on without State assistance. That business was built, first of all, on the belief of that nun in Divine Providence and, secondly, on the fundamental principle of producing a quality article and thirdly, by ensuring that the article would reach the customer in proper condition. That business has lasted down through the years and has weathered all the storms created by wars, by Hitler, Mussolini and the rest, and it continues to expand, even in spite of the British import levy. That is a business that I know well because it is a local business. I am conversant with its history.

I know that frequently it met obstacles but because they produced the right kind of article, they have not had to go to Germany looking for customers. Customers have come to them from Germany, the United States and other places. If he looked at the addresses on the parcels leaving the factory, I doubt if the Minister could read all of them because they are in diverse languages. I am not trying to belittle the Minister's educational qualifications. I have the highest opinion both of himself, of his sincerity and integrity.

It is time we realised in this country that, by and large, we have proved ourselves to be bad business people. Those firms that have made a success of their business have stood fundamentally on quality and have been able to hold customers once they got them. Successive Fianna Fáil Governments — I am not referring to the present Minister but to his predecessors—were loud in their condemnation of everything British at a time when we were searching for markets. We know the results today. There is also the question of uncertainty of transportation.

I think the Deputy is getting away from the Export Bill. The question of transport does not arise.

It is a vital question.

It is not a vital question and it is not relevant.

I was making the point in passing that, when we talk about an organisation like Córas Tráchtála and giving it statutory powers to borrow money, if necessary, for the furtherance of our exports, fundamentally linked with that must be the experience we have in relation to protracted dock strikes.

These matters do not arise on the Export Bill. The Minister is not responsible.

All right. It is too bad he should not have some responsibility to see that, if we produce an article in this country, it is possible to export it. I wonder what Córas Tráchtála in Ireland House, London, would do if, as a result of their best efforts down town, they secured an export order for £500,000 and then found it was going to be held up in the docks for months. In such circumstances, will the Leas-Cheann Comhairle not agree with me it is of vital importance that we are able to deliver the goods? However, that might be more relevant to the Department of Labour. The sooner we realise it is not merely a question of getting orders down town in London or Amsterdam, and saying we will deliver the goods in a fortnight's time when because of bad labour relations we cannot deliver them, the better.

Deputy Cosgrave mentioned that only a small number of firms go in for the export trade. That is true. We are fond of monopolies in this country. There seem to be only a few favourites who can get into it at all. People who have engaged in this work traditionally have been wiped out and pushed out. I suspect some firms in this country got grants and assistance from Córas Tráchtála more for political considerations than because of their ability to export and deliver the goods.

They do not issue grants.

Ní dóigh liom go n-eisítear deontais.

Ní duirt mé sin. Dún do bhéal anois.

Níl an freagra agat.

The Deputy said in Irish that Córas Tráchtála did not influence things in any way.

That is not what he said. You said they give grants. They do not.

You had the convention in Ballina when you shut the doors. You got the Deputy behind you in on the promise of a biscuit factory.

(Interruptions.)

Deputy O'Hara might be allowed to continue.

Will I be afforded an opportunity of speaking about the biscuit factory in Ballina, Sir?

You certainly can, and I will give it to you.

No doubt about it, you rode in on the biscuit factory.

You are not very well versed in industrial grants.

I am as well versed as you are.

Córas Tráchtála do not issue them.

The Deputy did not get the State car so he is a little sore.

It is a very poor answer.

The Minister has referred to this as a tidying-up Bill. The trend of what I have said deals with this matter. There is a lot of tidying up the Minister could and should do. It is worthy of note that, if any promotional effort is made to establish an industry, every possible encouragement is given to establishing it in this city.

We cannot argue that point on this Bill. The Deputy will have to listen to the Chair. If he does not want to do so, he can resume his seat.

Do not start any rough stuff with me.

The Deputy may not argue with the Chair.

I am not arguing at all. You do not need to get excited. You should deal with the situation across there and not here. If what I am saying is not palatable to these people, I cannot help it.

The Deputy is not being allowed make his speech.

The matter of our entry into EEC has been referred to. Although down through the years we said the British market was gone, in recent times we entered into a Trade Agreement with the British, to which approval was given here. We on this side always felt the British market was our traditional market. The picture will be changed completely and Córas Tráchtála will have a much bigger job on hands if we enter into EEC. There are some companies I should like to see continuing. If a company closes down in this country, even though it employs only ten or 15 people, it is a loss to somebody and a loss to the national effort. It can be a very serious loss from the point of view of the persons employed there and their families.

If we enter into EEC—and I sincerely hope we do—I do not mind going on record as saying there are many of the mushroom industries opened by Ministers down through the years—for which golden keys and scissors for cutting the tape were provided —on the locks and doors of which rust will be found shortly after we enter the Common Market. We have been spoonfeeding many of these industries for a long time. When I say "we", I mean the Irish taxpayer. The Minister is new in this Department.

Are you talking about the Mayco factory in Ballina?

Like the people in Córas Tráchtála, his training was not really a business training He is a man of standing, of broad outlook. He will not spare any effort to do what he can. I suggest to him, as I have already suggested to him, that he looks up the records of his Department and those of other Departments as well and having examined the figures very closely, ask himself how it is that millions worth of exports that normally went to Britain years ago do not now go across at all; how it is that what we substituted for these exports are not reaching the targets we were told they would reach.

We were told about economic expansion but that seems to be falling flat. If I develop that line of thought, the Chair will probably rule me out of order. I shall conclude by saying that I sincerely hope that Córas Tráchtála will further put their shoulder to the wheel in an effort to clear up the mess that we ourselves, a native Government, have created here down through the years.

I want to ask the Deputy what he meant by the Ballina biscuit factory? The secretary of the committee in charge was the Fine Gael election agent who was afterwards appointed a district justice by Fine Gael.

That does not arise for discussion on this Bill. I have already pointed out to Deputy O'Hara that the matter is not relevant.

I want to let Deputy O'Hara know——

Deputy Calleary will please resume his seat.

That lets me in. I shall be brief. It is very important that a matter of this kind should receive consideration by the House. It behoves us all to encourage, as far as we can, the promotion of exports and the promotion of the practice of exports, particularly in view of what appears inevitably to be facing us. For good or ill, this nation has been committed by this Government to walk hand in hand with Britain wherever she proposes to tread. It has been announced that Britain proposes to lose no time in endeavouring to get into what we call the Common Market. This, from what I can judge of it, is the most momentous problem we shall have to face in the years which lie ahead.

When we talk about the encouragement of exports and the provision of moneys to enable greater exports to be made from this country, it is impossible to separate the thought from what the future holds. On previous occasions here, when we discussed matters of this kind, I raised, as did many others in all parts of the House, I am sure, the problem of how well-equipped or how ill-equipped we are or will be to compete in the highly rationalised market towards which we are being driven primarily by the policy of this Government in locking our fate with that of Britain as they did under the Free Trade Area Agreement and, secondly, by world events. It may be said that the Government had no alternative but to take the steps they took in binding our future with the economic destiny of Britain. Everybody will not agree on it.

Even in Britain, even in the Government Party in Britain, not everybody is persuaded that getting into the Common Market will represent what it has been represented as here. Not everybody is persuaded that it will be the solution to all economic problems and that there is a huge market there in which, if we can get into it,. we can sell more or less at will. Experience has shown this not to be the case. In many instances—I am talking in the context of history rather than in the context of the Six—it has clearly been demonstrated that the results are depressing when you join together a highly industrialised economy with an agricultural entity, as was done, for instance, in the second half of the last century in Italy where the agricultural sector of the south joined with the highly industrialised northern sector, on the proposition, which everybody at the time accepted, that the benefits of mass production, as they were then described, in the northern part of the country would diffuse into the southern part and that the relative prosperity of that day would achieve a balance throughout the whole country. This did not in fact happen. The reverse happened. The agricultural area was even further denuded of population and was reduced to an even lower standard of living than that to which it had been accustomed over a long period—and that was long enough. In fact, rather than having an uplifting and a beneficial effect on the agricultural area, the advent of the greater market, which was the proposal then under consideration and which was acclaimed by the people of Italy, had a depressing effect.

This is the danger we face in so far as the Common Market is concerned. It is a gambler's throw for us. It is much in the mind of many people that the throw has been made with dice loaded against our economy. It would appear to me that we are not doing sufficient by way of the provision of moneys to people in this country to encourage them to expand their business and to export more or by the preparation of our economy for the situation into which we are apparently inexorably being led.

One of the most obvious steps which might have been taken by the Government and which has not, so far as I know, been taken would have been to establish an organisation which would send out into the world, as I instanced before, groups of what might be described as economic explorers who would find and fix the markets wherein to sell whatever we have to sell. We have not much to sell. When all comes to all and when we are forced back on the basic fundamentals of what springs from the soil of Ireland, we have a very limited range to sell. It should have been the act of a prudent Government, which this Government have not proved to be, to develop an organisational arm which would take up this task of finding out exactly what we can sell and where we can sell it in the years which lie ahead and, indeed, what may be the immediate future if Britain's plans come to an early fruition. Therefore, on that head, I think the Government stand guilty of the charge of listless inactivity and perhaps more correctly it could be described as an utter lack of appreciation of what is happening outside our shores.

The economic world, as represented by the Common Market, as far as one can read and judge, as far as one can hear from contacts with parliamentarians in these countries, is a highly organised, rationalised entity in which the emphasis is upon mass production and a lowering of costs to the minimum level. Indeed, it could be said that the emphasis is on a way of life to which we, as a nation, have never been accustomed. If we are to participate in that struggle to survive, it will be essential for us to revolutionise our whole approach to industry and, indeed, to agriculture. It will call for a far greater degree of governmental organisation than we now have and for a direction of industry to an extent which we do not now know. These are facts which must be accepted by our industrialists if we are to live at all in the circumstances which I describe.

These circumstances are not at all our seeking, certainly not all the seeking of the Labour Party. They are certainly not of a kind which I, looking at the situation, would think to be desirable and which we should seek. The concept of the Common Market has been talked about as if it were a kind of heaven towards which we were striving. I heard a previous Taoiseach say that it was urgently desirable that we should get into the Common Market, but I will not say that in the long-run this will be to the benefit of this nation.

It will be a long time before we become properly equipped, in the sense of manufacture and distribution of goods and the reorganisation of agriculture, to compete with the kind of complex which will face us if the day finally arrives when we must join with Britain in that situation. What we can do, facing the inevitable—and I say inevitable in a qualified way, in the sense that this Government are in control of the destinies of this country and have decided on it, and are bound hand and foot with Britain, and whatever Britain does we will eventually do the same—is that to which I have already adverted. We should discover what we can sell and where we can sell it, and we should set about preparing for the adaptation of such of our industries as are capable of adaption for the advent of this difficult situation. We, frankly, are very worried. When I say this, I know I am expressing the view of many thousands of workers in a number of industries who are worried about their future.

Let it not be thought that we can overnight adapt an industry such as the car assembly industry, which is most often referred to, to any other purpose. I should like to hear from the Government benches just what alternatives are to be provided for the workers in that industry.

I cannot see how the Deputy can discuss the motor industry on this Bill which deals with exports.

I am dealing with matters which are relevant to this Bill, even though I am debarred from doing so this time.

The Deputy will get a more suitable and a more relevant opportunity.

I do not know whether it will be in order for me to raise the very puzzling question of the Potez Factory on the Naas Road. I should like the Minister to say what is the future of that building. We were assured it was going to bring considerable employment to County Dublin. Indeed, the siting of it was welcomed all over this House.

The Deputy knows we are dealing with the functions of Córas Tráchtála in this Bill.

I do but on account of the worry abroad about Potez——

The matter does not arise on this Bill. It is totally outside the ambit of the Bill, and I think the Deputy is well aware of the fact.

It would not be stretching it too far if the Minister were to make a reference to it.

It would be to open disussion in detail.

It is not my purpose to open the discussion. Beidh lá eile againn i gcóir na h-oibre sin. When discussing additional moneys for the encouagement of exports, which is the function of Córas Tráchtála, one is at liberty to make the point that sufficient is not being done to prepare the country for what is ahead. One is entitled to ask the Minister what this new Government—because they are a new Government—propose to do to equip our people to face the very worrying future and, particularly, to readapt our workers who may be found to be in industries which may become redundant. The Minister may take the opportunity, when he is replying, to tell us what is in the Government's mind on this point.

There is in connection with this Bill a Money Resolution "to authorise such payments out of moneys provided by the Oireachtas as are necessary to give effect to any Act of the present session to amend and extend the Export Promotion Acts, 1959 to 1963." I think it important that we should trace the history of Córas Tráchtála since its inception under the Export Promotion Act, 1959. People talk about the Government not doing sufficient. In my view, and in the view of the people I represent, the Government are doing what they think is in the best interests of export promotion. I am quite satisfied as a Government backbencher that the Government would be delighted to hear of alternative proposals and they would accept these alternative proposals, sift them and take the best out of them. But we have not heard any alternatives to those the Minister is asking the House to approve today.

Córas Tráchtála was set up in 1959 and the total amount of grant to which the Board was entitled was £1 million. There was an amending Act in 1963 which increased that sum to £2½ million. By the end of the last financial year, grants made to the Board amounted to £2,081,000, leaving a balance of £419.000 to be sought. There is now a Bill before the House which proposes to raise the limit to £4½ million. Those who say that this Government are not doing sufficient in export promotion should examine the support given to Córas Tráchtála since 1959.

Remarks have been made about Britain and our possible entry into the Common Market. Can anybody in the House tell me—again it is a question of alternatives—where else can we get a better market than Britain? We have broken, as it were, the psychological political link with Britain. We should have done that 40 years ago but I believe we have done so now. As far as the facts and figures go, Britain is our best market. We should accept it as such. I see that Mr. George Browne is moving in the Common Market field again and if Britain enters the Common Market and we do not go in with her, where does that leave Ireland? It leaves Ireland hanging in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean. When people talk about Ireland's role or Ireland going in hand-in-glove with Britain, they should remember that Britain has been one of our most important markets, as has been proven by the figures over the years. The whole concept of a common market has been conceived in the minds of people who want to unify Europe economically. If Britain enters and we are left outside, where is our best market? The USA? I do not think we could compete in America.

I would ask those who say that the Government are not giving sufficient money to Córas Tráchtála to apply their minds in a very thorough fashion to the figures from the beginning of the export promotion in 1959 to the present time and they will see that the grants increased from £1 million in 1959 to £4½ million in 1966. I think this is sufficient answer to those who state that the Government do not put sufficient emphasis on what Córas Tráchtála has been doing. Córas Tráchtála has been doing a lot and it is to be congratulated on what it has been doing. This sort of destructive talk is undermining, in my view, Córas Tráchtála and similar semi-State bodies. These are new bodies created in the last five, six or ten years and they want every encouragement they can get. I believe that encouragement should come from this House and if people feel that Córas Tráchtála is not doing a sufficiently good job, let them tell us where it is not doing a good enough job and give us the alternative.

I shall not delay the House very long but I should like to support the recent statement of the Minister for Industry and Commerce in appealing to Irish industrialists to gear themselves for freer trading conditions and for greater competition in the markets in which they now enjoy such freedom. The statement of the Minister for Industry and Commerce has tremendous significance for the many people engaged in the industrial sphere, both employers and industrial workers. I hope that in his term as Minister he will reiterate this statement and, if necessary, take steps along the lines which he indicated he would possibly have to go if he saw that firms were not adapting themselves to the conditions of greater competition which we foresee.

Having listened to Deputy Dunne and the very pessimistic statements from the Labour benches this afternoon, I wonder do some of those Deputies ever read or listen to the statements by the Taoiseach and the Minister for Industry and Commerce. On this side of the House it has never been stated that entry into the European Economic Community, or even the European Free Trade Association, if that were possible, would be the answer to all our problems. This was never said and that impression was never given. It must always be realised that industrialists must prepare themselves for greater competition and this has been stated continuously over the past seven to ten years by Deputy Lemass as Taoiseach who tried to bring this message home very strongly to our industrialists. Over the past five, seven or ten years, he has been making the statements, week after week and month after month, that our industrialists must prepare themselves for greater competition and must increase their efficiency and productivity. That is absolutely essential if we are to survive.

Nothing will ever be easy but there is always the great hope that we would have entry into the greater markets in which we could find sale for our goods. By increasing our efforts at home and capturing markets in foreign lands, we could increase our industrial employment, the number of factories in the country. We could also follow up in other spheres of government in providing the necessary social benefits which we, in this Government, intend to provide for the less well-off sections of our community. This can never be done unless we avail of the opportunities and help to create wealth. The Government have always tried to assist anybody who wished to make an honest endeavour to promote industrial production, thereby giving employment and devoting some of the rewards of the increased wealth thus created to assist the less well-off sections who are in receipt of social welfare benefits.

It is rather disheartening to hear at this stage Deputies on the opposite side of the House stating that the Fianna Fáil Government were interested only in giving industrial grants to foreigners. Again, this type of statement can be taken up incorrectly by members of the public. You hear people repeating these statements without knowing whether they are true or false. The very fact that the Minister for Industry and Commerce got up the other night and put Irish industrialists on the mat by telling them they were not availing of the adaptation grants provided by this Government to a sufficient degree, that he was not satisfied with the demand for adaptation grants, proves that this Government are more than anxious to provide financial assistance for Irish industrialists who wish to avail of them to increase their productivity and thus increase employment and help to improve the position in regard to our balance of trade.

There is not a factory owner in the country who, wishing to extend his premises and thereby to place his firm in a more competitive position, to increase the efficiency in his factory and to capture markets abroad, who can say that he cannot get aid from this Government to assist him in that extension. We have continually stated that extension is absolutely essential. The aids are there and this Fianna Fáil Government are disappointed that demands are not coming in from Irish industrialists for these grants which are made available. It is disappointing to hear irresponsible statements still coming from the Opposition benches that this Government are interested only in foreign industrialists. One would think, sitting here and listening to the speeches from the Opposition benches, that there was only one factory in this country, that this Government only gave aid to one factory and one foreigner, that, of course, being Potez. How often do we hear Potez mentioned here? It shows the narrow outlook of some people and how little knowledge they have of industrial matters when they persist in referring to just this one factory which is having difficulty. I have personal experience of Potez in operation.

I have ruled other Deputies out of order on the question of Potez.

It may be out of order but criticism was made of the assistance given to the Potez factories. I decry that criticism because it injures the progress being made in the Galway Potez factory, and does not assist that factory.

Would the Deputy relate that to the matter before the House?

I was talking about the one on the Naas Road.

But the Deputy referred to Potez and the one about which I am speaking is the Potez factory in my constituency.

In Galway?

That factory has made progress and the Deputy will eat his own words one day about the Potez factory on the Naas Road.

The Deputy is frightening me now. He is terrifying me.

It is absurd to argue that no one hundred per cent industrialist should be given a grant unless he can guarantee making a profit and be a success. No person in business could give such a guarantee. If he could, everybody would be in business because there would be no risks. There are always failures in industry. There is always the marginal firm which will go down or the one which will have difficulties and it is a narrow outlook to harp continually on the odd one that has difficulty.

This one did not even start.

The factory has been erected and the money has been invested in the State. Mark my words, goods will come out of that factory and the critics here will eat their own words in the years to come.

There can be no discussion on an individual industry. The Deputy is going over the same ground on which previous speakers were ruled out of order.

We should really be discussing Córas Tráchtála. That body has done its work very well. There is ample evidence and proof of that in the fact that speakers so far have not been able to criticise Córas Tráchtála. If that body were not doing its work properly and finding markets abroad for Irish goods, we would surely have had Opposition Deputies criticising the lack of effort on the part of Córas Tráchtála. I do not know a great deal about their operations but they certainly seem to have a very able staff who go about their work in a very efficient manner, so effectively it seems that it is not possible for us to criticise them in the smallest degree. I wish them every success and I congratulate the Minister on increasing the grant. I hope their work will keep pace with the progress the country is making under a Fianna Fáil Government.

Mention was made of the British market and Ireland House, the headquarters of Córas Tráchtála in London. One of the things for which we fought was the right to choose to what country we would sell our goods and I do not see why any derogatory reference should be made to the British market. We are independent. We can make our own decision and, if it suits us to sell our goods to Britain, then let us sell them there.

Hear, hear. It is a grand thing to hear a young man in Fianna Fáil saying that.

I did not intend to intervene but, having listened to some of the young men in the Fianna Fáil benches, I feel compelled to say a few words. Deputy Molloy says he is disappointed——

At not being made a Parliamentary Secretary.

——in the attitude adopted by this side and the speeches made on this side. May I tell him—I am sure he will be glad to hear it— that I have been heartened today by the speeches made by Deputies on the opposite benches? Deputy Andrews asked where could we get a better market? Is it not a grand thing even at this late hour, to hear that from that side of the House?

The Deputy is mixing up economics and nationalism.

Irrespective of what I may be mixing up, it is a grand thing to hear Deputy Andrews admit we cannot get a better market than Britain.

I said that if we cannot, there is no reason why we should not trade with Britain.

The question asked was: where can we get a better market?

Let the Deputy answer it.

Is that not what we have preached on this side of the House for years?

We fought for independence so that our Government could make their own decisions.

Deputy Andrews and Deputy Molloy have already spoken and they might allow Deputy Belton, who is not in the habit of interrupting, to make his speech now.

He is asking questions.

It is very heartening even in this year, 1966, to hear that admission from Fianna Fáil and particularly heartening to hear it from the younger element in Fianna Fáil.

Hear, hear.

I do not profess to know a great deal about Córas Tráchtála but, judging by what I hear, I believe it is making an honest and genuine effort to promote trade. I am in favour of any body which will try to get markets abroad for this country. Anyone who promotes exports is doing a good job in helping the economy and helping to provide employment, employment which is badly needed. Deputy Dunne says we are tied hand and foot to Britain at the moment. I do not agree that we are tied hand and foot but this Party have always held the belief that this country should trade with Britain for geographical, if for no other, reasons. We supported the recent Free Trade Agreement because we believe we must trade with Britain.

With regard to the Common Market, it is our belief that, if Britain enters, we must of necessity enter also.

Debate adjourned.
Barr
Roinn