Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Thursday, 30 Apr 1992

Vol. 418 No. 9

Adjournment Debate. - Threatened Closure of Waterford Plants.

I am raising this matter because of the disturbing statements made in recent weeks by both the chairman and chief executive of Waterford Crystal, Mr. Don Brennan and Dr. Paddy Galvin, who expressed doubts about the continuation of the glass manufacturing enterprises at Waterford and Dungarvan. It is not my intention to be scaremongering but the threat of closure must be addressed by the Government and the relevant State agency, the IDA. Closure of these enterprises would mean the loss of 2,500 jobs and devastate the local economies of Waterford and Dungarvan. I am aware that a study into the viability of the operation is taking place at present.

I am extremely concerned that as a result of the findings of this study there may be a shattering announcement from a boardroom in New York. The company are now effectively controlled by the American bank, Morgan Stanley, in conjunction with Mr. Tony O'Reilly of the Fitzwilton Group. Sentiment does not appear to be a consideration in their deliberations, as they have shown by their manufacturing of the new Marquise range in mainland Europe. The Marquise range is a lower priced line of glassware which is machine manufactured. This glass is now being manufactured in three or four different countries in mainland Europe such as Portugal, Germany and Yugoslavia.

It has to be admitted that the technology in the Waterford plant is outdated. I am asking that the Government, together with the IDA, give every assistance to update the equipment so that the company can compete effectively in the market-place. The Government should monitor closely the company's problems and intentions. That is why I am raising this matter in the Dáil today. Specifically I am asking the Government to monitor what is taking place.

Since the strike of 1990 there has been a very poor relationship between workers and management. Short-time working has been the order of the day, inflicting severe financial hardship and stress on the workforce and their families. An initiative is badly needed to improve the position. The workers feel that their grievances are being totally ignored and that they are being starved of information as to the company's intentions. The workers' conditions have been considerably worsened by the cuts in pay-related benefits introduced by the Government in the recent Social Welfare Bill. It is bad enough for people to be on short-time work, which may involve working 12 out of 52 weeks in the year, but to have their pay-related benefit cut by £17 a week is adding insult to injury and there is very bad feeling about that legislation.

The Government should repeal this section of the Social Welfare Bill while the present position pertains in Waterford Glass. In addition, the Minister for Labour should involve himself immediately in creating a better understanding in the work-place. A labour relations officer should be appointed on a full-time basis to keep workers informed of developments within the company. I do not say that lightly, because there is a lack of information permeating through to the workforce. Public relations in the company is extremely poor and they are very dismissive of the workers' wishes. A labour relations officer should be appointed on a full-time basis to keep workers informed of developments within the company so that they would not read of decisions taken days later in the newspapers. It is important that the whole atmosphere, which at present is decidely unhelpful, be improved considerably. It would be much preferable to act now than to try to retrieve what may be an impossible position at a later date.

I fully share Deputy Deasy's concern about the difficulties being experienced by this company. Let me say at the outset that I agree that it would indeed be a major tragedy, not only for the employees directly affected but for the wider area if the company were to cease manufacturing in Ireland. However, it is to be sincerely hoped that that will not happen.

The Minister, Deputy O'Malley recently had a meeting with the company and the IDA have also had recent meetings with them. The Minister will meet members of the Amalgamated Transport and General Workers Union on Sunday next to discuss the situation. It is clear to all concerned that the company face considerable problems. Their major markets in the United States and in the UK have been in recession for some time now. The company have suffered losses for a number of consecutive years. I am somewhat heartened to note that the recently announced results for 1991 show some relative improvement, but not, however, to the extent that the directors can recommend the payment of a dividend.

I am assured that the company are doing everything possible to improve their competitive position and to seek to increase market share in a declining market. Their decision to source some crystal products outside Ireland for the American market has caused some concern. It would of course be preferable if all the company's products could profitably be made in Waterford. However, I think that this has to be seen as an attempt by the company to fight back in a difficult market situation. It is aimed at tapping into a new market segment in order to increase the company's overall sales. This will help generate the extra business needed to bring the company back to future viability and profitability and ensure greater security of employment for the maximum number of jobs.

I would not underestimate the task ahead. If it is to succeed, a positive constructive attitude must be taken by all concerned. I am advised that the company are preparing a development plan the aim of which will be to bring them through the current difficult period to a secure future preserving the maximum possible number of jobs in the company. I understand that all aspects of the company's operation are being looked at. Until the plan has been completed I understand that no decisions will be taken by management about the company's future and it would not be helpful at this point to try to speculate about their plans. In the meantime the company need the patient support of all concerned, shareholders and other financiers, management and workers alike, so that they can regain as soon as possible their former vigour and profitability and their pre-eminence in this increasingly competitive market.

I have asked the IDA to continue to monitor closely the situation and to keep me informed of developments. While I still have concerns, I have an inherent faith in the commonsense and ability of both workers and management in the firm to work together so as to ensure the future viability of the operation and thus to preserve the maximum possible number of jobs in the company.

As an exceptional matter, the Chair is agreeable to Deputy Deasy raising one question.

Would the Minister, Deputy Ahern, convey my request that the appointment of a permanent labour relations officer be made so that the workers in this company can be kept informed of developments? Much of the bad feeling is due to a lack of information getting through to the workforce.

I will do that.

Barr
Roinn