Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 2 Nov 2011

Vol. 745 No. 2

Other Questions

Common Agricultural Policy

Bernard J. Durkan

Ceist:

5 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the degree to which he intends to seek support for his position and proposals on Common Agriculture Policy reform throughout the other EU member states in view of the fundamental nature of the food industry in Europe and the extent to which Europe can naturally meet the ever increasing demand for food; if he will endeavour to ensure that the industry in Europe is not undermined in the context of other agreements in the context of the World Trade Organisation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [31733/11]

Food security in the European Union is the essence of what the new Common Agricultural Policy is about.

Growing populations and increasing demand for protein-based foods, which is what we predominantly produce in Ireland through the dairy and meat industries, present a significant opportunity not only to continue, as the EU has been, to promote a sustainable way of producing food from an environmental and climate point of view but also to produce greater volumes of food. We in Ireland have a blueprint to do that in the form of Food Harvest 2020. By 2020, we plan to produce 50% more milk in volume terms and to increase the value of beef exports by 40%. Likewise, we also plan for expansion and growth in the poultry, pig, sheepmeat and lamb sectors, and we have the capacity to do so.

In the recent past, CAP policy has been about deliberately restricting production in order to keep prices officially high within the EU as compared with prices outside the Union. That argument is no longer relevant because the increased demand for food has put prices outside the Union more or less on a par with internal prices. I will continue to make the case for sustainable intensification of food production, which is what agriculture should be all about.

I thank the Minister for his reply. Has he identified those member states within the Union upon which he can rely in the pursuit of his policy, which is entirely laudable and something with which we all would agree? To what extent can he rely on their support given the many competing demands that currently arise and will arise in the context of the WTO negotiations and bearing in mind what he said in his reply regarding the importance of the food industry to Europe as a whole and the capacity of Europe to make a major contribution to continuity and security of supply worldwide?

In regard to food security within the European Union and the need to protect our capacity to produce large volumes of high-quality food in this country, there are potential threats in the context of WTO negotiations and other bilateral trade agreements which are currently on the table. For example, Mercosur, the South American trade bloc of which Brazil and Argentina are the two largest members, is currently in ongoing negotiations with the European Union with a view to producing and selling more produce for export into the European Union with fewer restrictions, in return for which certain EU exports, predominantly financial services and manufactured products, will gain access to South American markets. From an Irish perspective, this presents threats of which we must be wary. Given that our largest food export is beef, the prospect of significantly increased imports of high-value beef from countries such as Brazil is a cause for concern. However, for a whole series of reasons, any deal on Mercosur has been put off for the foreseeable future. Nevertheless, the overall thrust of the Deputy's point is correct. Several countries are very similar to Ireland in their thinking on this issue. There are also countries which are far more protectionist in their outlook in terms of food production and cross-border trade.

I am interested in the Minister's observations on two aspects of the current proposal for the next phase of the Common Agricultural Policy. First, the indications are that suckler cow herd numbers in the country are on a downward trend, which may well have to do with the economics of rearing calves in this manner. There are consequences if that decline were to continue in that the supply lines for the beef industry would be affected in a relatively short period. The proposals are not very compatible with the promotion and development of the suckler cow herd.

The second issue relates to entitlements established in 2011 and preceding years. In family settlement situations, for instance, a farm owner with attached entitlements may decide to allocate part of the land and entitlements to two or three family members. Will those family members establish entitlements within the context of the new proposals in terms, for example, of being able to avail of the land-based support as proposed?

I share the Deputy's concern in regard to the suckler cow herd. As the excitement grows in advance of 2015 regarding the potential of the dairy industry, there is a danger, if we are not careful, that in parts of the country where dairy has real potential the beef herd could become a by-product of the dairy herd, which is not at all what we want. Currently, half of the beef sold out of Ireland comes from the dairy herd and half from the suckler herd. All of the high-end, high-value product comes from suckler herds. We must keep that intact.

That is the basis on which I am seeking to protect and defend the suckler cow welfare scheme in the build-up to a difficult budget. We must send a strong signal that we will support the suckler herd financially, if necessary, in order to keep it intact, particularly for those farmers who are producing higher quality beef, as are the approximately 30,000 who are in the welfare scheme and the beef quality assurance scheme that goes with it. We will continue to pursue policies that counteract a reduction in the size of the suckler herd. Ireland's beef exports are expected to decline to 460,000 tonnes this year from 500,000 in 2010. While the value of beef exports is rising as a consequence of increasing beef prices, the volume has decreased slightly, which is something we must address. It is a similar story in terms of sheep and lamb, although lamb prices are starting to decrease.

Agricultural Development

Bernard J. Durkan

Ceist:

6 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine his proposals for the future development and extension of the beef, lamb, pigmeat, poultry and dairy sectors in this country with a view to maximising employment and exports thereby contributing to natural economic recovery; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [31734/11]

This ties in with the previous question where Deputy Durkan raised the issue of how agriculture can be a driver for economic growth within the Irish economy. On assuming office, I stated clearly that as far as I am concerned, my Department is a major economic ministry. It can and will provide a major good news story in terms of job creation, wealth creation and economic growth in the next four or five years.

From a pricing point of view, the price of lamb, milk, poultry and pigmeat has rarely been as strong as it is now. Moreover, the demand for what we produce is stronger than ever. The global population reached 7 billion in recent days and will continue to increase. The diet of much of the developing world, where most of the growth is happening, is changing from a carbohydrate-based diet, consisting predominantly of rice and maize, to a protein-based diet comprising the foods which we produce so well in this country. In that context there are great opportunities for further growth and expansion and the maintenance of strong pricing. That is why we have a very ambitious blueprint for expansion and growth which enjoys the support of farmers, processors, food companies, politicians, agents of the State and academics. We are all working to the same agenda. It is probably the first time that has ever happened in terms of Irish agriculture. To be fair to the last Government, it was responsible for producing the Food Harvest document. We are determined to deliver on it month on month, not just every two or three years.

Whether it is dairy, beef, pigmeat or lamb, our objective is to increase volume. To that end, we will have to support specific industries that are weak. We also seek to add significant value to the products we are producing. The opportunity to do so in all of these sectors is there and waiting to be delivered upon.

Additional information not given on the floor of the House

In addition to being Ireland's largest indigenous industry, the agrifood sector is characterised by a high output multiplier, low import content and a significant regional impact, with attendant direct and indirect economic benefits which are heavily weighted towards rural communities. Measured in terms of export earnings, the economic reach of the industry can be gauged from the fact that food and drink exports were worth €7.9 billion in 2010. This strong export orientation means the agrifood sector will be pivotal to our plans for economic recovery. The broad strategy for maximising the employment and export potential of the agrifood industry is set out in the Food Harvest 2020 report launched in July 2010. It provides a roadmap for the future development of the specific sectors identified by the Deputy.

Beef production is the predominant activity on Irish farms with more than 100,000 holdings involved in supplying the raw material to an industry that employs almost 8,000 people and produces an exported product worth more than €1.5 billion in 2010. The prospects for 2011 are even better with the value of beef exports expected to grow by 9% to upwards of €1.7 billion for the year. The Food Harvest report offers a vision for the long-term development of all the main food industry sectors. In regard to the beef sector specifically, an industry-led activation group reported earlier this year.

This report suggests there is market demand to support growth in the suckler and dairy herds. Maximising beef output potential from the national herd is contingent on a number of factors, not least the price of beef on EU and international markets. In light of current and future market developments, it is essential that a co-ordinated approach is taken by stakeholders to improve efficiency at farm and processing level, breed better animals, maintain high standards of quality and food safety and maximise the market potential of Ireland's unique natural advantages.

We are already seeing results in, for example, the areas of innovation and collaboration. Bord Bia has secured accreditation for its beef carbon footprint model. It is now part of the beef and lamb quality assurance scheme, making it the first such scheme to include environmental criteria. Plans are in train to extend this model to other products and to include additional environmental benchmarks on water and biodiversity. This is as an important practical step towards the goal of creating an umbrella Brand Ireland identity as recommended in the 2020 strategy. On the production side, Teagasc is working with the processing industry on research projects investigating dairy beef production and on optimal young bull production. My Department continues to make a substantial financial contribution to the Irish Cattle Breeding Federation to support its efforts to improve breed quality.

In recent times, there have been many positive signs pointing to a recovery in the sheep sector. Last year the average factory price for heavy lambs was approximately 17% ahead of 2009 levels and this trend is continuing in 2011, with average prices for the year to date running almost 10% ahead of 2010. Another encouraging sign is that for the first time in over a decade, 2010 saw a halt in the annual decline in sheep numbers, with numbers increasing by 1.3%. I am hopeful that 2011 will be another good year for sheep farmers.

The long-term future of the sheep sector will depend on its ability to meet the needs of the market. To do so successfully it must focus on competitiveness, innovation and the demands of the consumer. The Food Harvest 2020 strategy sets a target of 20% growth in the output value of the sheep sector by 2020. This is achievable given the right policy framework and favourable market conditions. Particular actions have been identified in the Food Harvest 2020 report covering the areas of farm competitiveness, the processing sector and marketing.

The sector has benefited from several key supports in recent years, including €7 million from the 2009 single farm payment national reserve under the uplands sheep payment scheme and €54 million for the three-year grassland sheep scheme which commenced in 2010. These measures have provided a much needed boost to sheep farmers' incomes. The grassland scheme in particular is proving to be a valuable support mechanism by improving income and confidence in the sector. In addition, Bord Bia will spend up to €1 million this year on the promotion of sheep and lamb at home and abroad, and Teagasc has allocated almost €1.5 million for sheep research for 2011. I remain committed to supporting this valuable industry and monitoring its progress closely.

The pig industry is a valuable component of the overall agrifood sector and has a farmgate value in excess of €300 million. The sector supports approximately 7,000 jobs including production, slaughter, processing, feed manufacture and services, which are dispersed around the country. Prices during 2011 are higher than in both of the previous years and currently stand at €146.10 per 100 kg, some 9.3% ahead annually, while production has increased by more than 8%. Exports for the first six months of 2011 reached almost 84,000 tonnes, an increase of 23% compared with the same period in 2010. The value of this trade, at some €196 million, is 18% ahead year on year. All markets have registered an increase with trade outside of the EU more than doubling. My Department and its agencies will play a central role, along with industry, in ensuring the Food Harvest targets are met.

The farmgate value of Irish-produced poultry meat is approximately €120 million. The sector supports approximately 6,000 jobs both directly and indirectly. Despite considerable competition from imports, the domestic industry has proven to be quite resilient in recent years. The majority of Irish product is consumed in this country with exports focussing largely on by-products. The target in the medium term is to increase the share of the Irish poultry meat market being supplied by Irish producers. The development of high standards of food quality has been a particular focus for my Department and its agencies. To this end, Bord Bia is developing and enhancing policies with regard to poultry quality assurance. Food Harvest 2020 has targeted a 10% increase in the value of poultry output. Work towards this target will be aided by several initiatives which have been taken in the areas of animal welfare, disease surveillance and food safety.

From a dairying perspective, the Food Harvest report sets an ambitious target of a 50% growth in milk production by 2020 compared with the average for the 2007-09 period. The realisation of this target will be dependent on the achievement of maximum efficiency at production and processing levels. The report's recommendations focus on changes needed in milk processing, on-farm competitiveness, the transfer of technology and knowledge to dairy farmers, and in research and development and marketing.

The dairy expansion activation group has got the implementation ball rolling in the dairy sector. Earlier this year it produced a roadmap setting out 55 actions that are required to achieve the 50% increase in milk production. These are broken into four categories, namely, on-farm production, efficiency in the milk processing sector, the development of market opportunities and general agriculture policy. Dr. Sean Brady, who chaired the dairy expansion activation group, is continuing to facilitate the process of implementation and to monitor progress. All stakeholders are being encouraged to discharge the responsibilities assigned to them, and the response is being monitored and reported upon.

In so far as international trade is concerned, I have been extremely active in developing relationships in new and expanding markets in order to build the type of confidence in Irish production and control systems which will provide a platform for long-term trading relationships in the future. As part of that effort, I hosted a visit from the Chinese Vice-Minister for Agriculture earlier this year and signed a mutual co-operation agreement in the agrifood sector. In addition, my Department has engaged with a range of third countries, including Australia, the Philippines, South Korea, China, Turkey, Egypt, Algeria and others, with a view to opening new markets and expanding the presence of Irish food products in existing markets. Bord Bia continues, through its marketing and promotional activities and its quality assurance schemes, to consolidate the position of the Irish agrifood sector on the domestic market and to expand its presence in EU and third-country markets.

Food Harvest 2020 is the key strategy document for the development of the agrifood sector in the next decade. I am chairing a high-level implementation committee to ensure the actions necessary to facilitate the development of the agrifood sector are taken.

Milestones for Success, the first annual progress report on the implementation of Food Harvest 2020, was published in July. More than 90% of the 215 initiatives have been commenced. A great deal of effort has already been made by all stakeholders and there is a strong commitment to delivering results. A good start has been made and I am confident the momentum generated by that good start will be carried forward.

This is a replica of questions on this industry that I and other Members have tabled over many years. To what extent, if any, has the Minister engaged with the stakeholders in the beef, lamb, pigmeat, poultry and dairy sectors with a view to identifying specific targets and employment increases that could be gained as a result? To what degree, if any, has it been possible to determine in the present economic climate precise targets for expansion in respect of volume, which is most important as the Minister has correctly pointed out, as opposed to merely relying on price increases? Is it intended to set out specific targets in this area? It is generally accepted that the growth areas of the economy at present will be the means by which the country can work its way out of its present difficulties.

The Deputy is correct — there is no point in having broad aspirations about growth. That is why anybody interested in the agrifood sector should read the Food Harvest 2020 document, which is a very easy read. It is specific in the targets. It is not specific on employment because it is very difficult to calculate direct employment creation in a number of these sectors. It is easier to gauge employment in the seafood sector. In this year alone we have seen an extra 272 jobs in seafood processing which has been supported through grant aid. There will be a 26% increase in exports to France, the country to which we export most seafood. That is linked to some of the work we are doing on processing.

In some of the other areas we are quite specific. Dairy should have 50% growth in volume and there should be a 40% value increase across all the sectors by 2020. The initial Food Harvest 2020 document planned for a 20% increase by value in beef exports and we have subsequently upgraded that. The specific beef activation group that is monitoring the progress of Food Harvest 2020 has subsequently given me a report suggesting that we upgrade that target to a 40% increase rather than a 20% increase because of the increase in beef prices that has happened. If the Deputy wants specifics, he should look at the document, which is very specific. It is also specific on how we get there. I chair an implementation group that meets every second month and reviews delivery on the targets set out in the document. This is a working document that is changing all the time and is very much driving the industry forward. The proof of that is that this year we will export an additional €1 billion worth of food. We will go from just under €8 billion worth of food exports last year to just under €9 billion this year, which is phenomenal growth given the recession.

I believe everybody has bought into the vision for agriculture and the food industry. Regarding the extra €1 billion worth of food exports, there is some concern within the sector that the increase is down to price increases rather than increases in the amount we are producing. Does the Minister have figures to indicate if it is the volume that has increased or if it is down to the prices we are getting?

It is both. I do not have exact figures on the breakdown. However, the average price for beef, for example, is 15% to 18% higher than the average price last year. Even though the tonnage of beef exported has reduced slightly, the value has increased because of prices. In the case of beef it is more about an increase in the price of beef rather than an increase in volume. However, in other sectors — certainly in the seafood sector — it is both value and volume, as is the case in the dairy sector. I can get the Deputy the exact breakdown if he wishes.

I appreciate that.

Regarding the increases in prices as opposed to volume, can any action be taken to engage with the various stakeholders to identify areas where the industry might overheat which might in turn result in market resistance leading to a downturn in that element of the economy? What steps could be taken unilaterally or under the aegis of the EU to ensure that would not happen?

I have some figures to hand. In the first six months of 2011, exports of pigmeat reached 84,000 tonnes, an increase 23% on last year. Lamb prices are approximately 10% higher than at this time last year and demand across key export markets is strengthening and medium-term forecast is good. Sheep supplies to date in 2011 are running 1% higher than last year. I already gave the figures for beef. Dairy prices remain strong with global prices well ahead of last year — milk is 34 cent per litre in Ireland. The Commission forecast is for global production to continue to increase steadily but for prices to remain at high levels, well above the average for the past decade. The value of dairy exports has increased by approximately 37% in 2011. The export increase reflects increased prices and increased volume.

Does the Minister have a breakdown?

The dairy figure is very significant and makes up most of the growth we are discussing.

Control of Noxious Weeds

Nicky McFadden

Ceist:

7 Deputy Nicky McFadden asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if his attention has been drawn to the fact that lands under the control of every county council and many town councils are infested with ragwort; and if he will direct these bodies to remedy the situation in order to avoid an offence under the Noxious Weeds Act 1936. [30249/11]

Nicky McFadden

Ceist:

8 Deputy Nicky McFadden asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine his plans to amend the Noxious Weeds Act 1936 to provide an up-to-date and realistic penalty for breaches of the Act; when there was last a prosecution pursuant to the Noxious Weeds Act 1936; and if he will draw the attention of the Garda Commissioner to the need for the enforcement of this legislation. [31633/11]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 7 and 8 together.

The Noxious Weeds Act 1936 provides for the control of the spread of six noxious weeds, namely, thistle, ragwort, dock, common barberry, male wild hop plant and the wild oat. Under the Act, it is an offence not to prevent the spread of these noxious weeds. The owner, occupier, user or managers of lands on which these weeds are present are subject to the provisions of the Act, including a fine of up to €1,000 on conviction.

The last prosecution under the Act was taken in 1988. However, the Department actively seeks to enforce the provisions of the Act by issuing notices to destroy in all instances where it becomes aware of the presence of noxious weeds. A total of 26 such notices were issued in 2010 with a further 35 having been issued to date in 2011. These notices are issued as a result of inspections carried out by Department field officers or on receipt of complaints made by the public. Follow-up action may be undertaken by my officials with the landowner to ensure the notifications are acted upon and that the particular weeds have been dealt with as stipulated in the notice to destroy.

Additionally, under the EU single farm payment scheme, farmers are obliged to keep their lands free from noxious weeds under the cross-compliance measures of the scheme. Failure to do so may result in a reduction of their payment entitlements. In the years 2009, 2010 and 2011 penalties under the single payment were applied to 27, 31 and 46 farmers, respectively, for failure to take appropriate measures to prevent the proliferation of noxious weeds.

My Department continues to engage with all local authorities and the National Roads Authority to ensure a consistent programme of treatment and disposal of noxious weeds on roadsides on an ongoing basis. The Department has conducted a number of public awareness campaigns in recent years seeking to raise awareness of the impact of such weeds and the necessity for the control of noxious weeds and to promote best practice with regard to the control and elimination of noxious weeds. These campaigns were directed at landowners and users of land — mainly farmers, developers and local authorities. The campaigns utilised various tools such as the publication of advertising in local, national and trade publications and the production of posters for display in all departmental, Teagasc and local authority offices. In addition, my officials will be in contact with all local authorities during the coming months to emphasise the importance of treatment and disposal measures to eliminate and prevent the spread of noxious weeds.

I thank the Minister for his comprehensive reply. There are noxious weeds everywhere, including in the Phoenix Park, which is infuriating. Does the Minister propose to amend the Noxious Weeds Act 1936 to provide for an updated and realistic penalty for breaches of the Act? Noxious weeds are toxic to cattle, horses, deer, pigs, goats and chickens, as they cause copper to accumulate in the liver resulting in ill-health and death. There are noxious weeds all along the motorways and, as I said, in the Phoenix Park. I regret to say the Minister's attempt to eliminate the problem through the advertising campaign is not working.

The Deputy's point is, to a certain extent, fair. While I will look at this issue again, I am keen on implementing the existing legislation rather than introducing a whole new set of regulations or primary legislation. A fine of €1,000, if enforced, will change habits. Dealing with the local authorities will, however, be more difficult because they are an arm of the State. Cutbacks in local authority budgets might have resulted in a lower level of maintenance of green areas and roadsides and consequently more weeds, particularly in public areas. I will ask my officials to look at this matter in more detail and come back to the Deputy on it.

Dairy Sector

Denis Naughten

Ceist:

9 Deputy Denis Naughten asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the steps he will take to support the development of a regionally balanced dairy sector post 2014; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [31632/11]

I thank the Deputy for raising this issue. However, I am not sure what, in the context of development of a regionally balanced dairy sector, he is looking for from me. I assume his question relates to the position post-2015, preparations being made in that regard in the context of the absence of dairy quota and a dramatic expansion of the dairy industry and how we ensure that expansion will provide a dividend for all regions, rather than particular pockets of the country. The honest answer is that it will be difficult to do this. Certain farms, soil types and skill sets will allow particular parts of the country to expand more aggressively than others. Lest there be uncertainty, there is strong viability to produce milk in all provinces. For example, there are pockets of fertile land within disadvantaged areas.

Dairy farms are efficient. We must continue our journey towards efficiency within the dairy sector which is very much under way through structures such as the dairy discussion groups and other initiatives taken by processors in building the business skills base on dairy farms. Glanbia recently launched a proactive initiative and I expect other co-operatives to do the same. I do not see any reason development of a new market for milk and milk related produce cannot be of benefit across the country, be it in the Deputy's constituency or mine in which traditionally people have assumed most of the growth will take place.

I am aware that this is an issue close to the Leas-Cheann Comhairle's heart. I congratulate Mr. Aaron Forde and his team at Connaught Gold on its negotiations which were completed last weekend.

Perhaps the Minister might address the issue of the balanced expansion of the dairy industry. Naturally, particular parts of the country are ahead of the curve in that regard. However, two critical issues in my part of the country are farm scale and access to processing capacity and the efficiency of processors. The Minister will be aware that farm consolidation relief lapsed in June. Has consideration been given to re-establishing it to ensure farm consolidation can take place, which would help to achieve significant efficiencies in these areas? Also, what steps are being taken to try to improve processing capacity and efficiency? Is it the case that following the abolition of dairy quotas, what will be important is access to a contract with a process in order to deliver milk? That is going to present a big challenge.

The Deputy has made a number of relevant points. On farm scale and consolidation, he is correct that farm consolidation relief ran out at the end of June. I have already submitted a package of taxation measures to the Department of Finance which it is hoped will be approved in advance of the budget. Through that package I am trying to achieve a number of things, the first of which is to increase land mobility in Ireland, in other words, ensuring we will have more land for sale. For example, while the average field in France comes up for sale once every 70 years, in Ireland it only comes up for sale once every 400 years. We have a problem with the availability of land for purchase, which means the price of agricultural land is far higher than it should be. Second, I want to ensure continued support for longer term leases in order that people will be able to get their hands on land to expand in order to achieve scale. Third, I want to encourage the handing over of land to younger farmers fresh out of college who are full of new ideas and energy, whom it is hoped will receive support, in terms of a top-up payment, through the new proposals attached to the single farm payment. We want to get young farmers farming, as only 7% of farmers in Ireland are under 35 years of age, which is not good enough.

The Minister's time has expired.

I would like to finish my point. I understand there are not too many questions remaining. As such, we are not restricted in terms of time.

I will decide that matter.

This is an important issue.

We are trying to be helpful.

In trying to achieve economies of scale for farmers on small holdings we want to encourage farm partnerships, not alone partnerships within families but partnerships between neighbours in order that there will be a collective approach towards purchasing or leasing machinery, fertilisers, sprays and so on. Ultimately, we want to see facilities such as dairy parlours being shared to ensure maximum use. We want veterinary bills to apply to a number of farms rather than to an individual farm following the call-out of vets on different days and so on. There is a lot we can do to challenge and encourage farmers to act collectively while retaining their holdings. While not compromising the ownership model, they could buy into a co-operation or farm partnership model which we hope to encourage through the taxation system.

Thank you, Minister.

There is a series of items into which farmers with small holdings could buy to help them to become more efficient and thus reduce the cost of their inputs.

Two questions arise from the Minister's reply. Are there any plans to reintroduce farm consolidation relief which lapsed in June?

On farm partnerships, the Minister will be aware that part of the difficulty in this regard is that partnership law dates back to British rule. The law in this regard is completely outdated to meet the needs of today. This is part of the risk associated with going down the road towards partnership. Does the Minister propose to introduce primary legislation to deal specifically with farm partnerships or to reform the partnership process in general? The processing capacity will be a challenge in all parts of the country but particularly in my part of the country. Without a contract to deliver milk to a processing facility, many farmers will not be able to re-establish dairying in our region.

On the question about the farm consolidation relief, I would like to see this re-introduced but it is not a decision for me. I have made the recommendation but we will have to wait for the Department of Finance to issue a response. I do not want to make too many promises in advance of the budget. We have a package of taxation measures which are currently under consideration. We have submitted them in plenty of time and I hope I can have the majority of them agreed. The farm consolidation relief is one of them.

If primary legislation is required to deal with partnerships, I am happy to introduce it. I am informed much can be done without the need for primary legislation. Teagasc is supportive of this concept and it has done a lot of work in this regard. I am hopeful that next year a number of partnership pilot projects will be set up in the west and in other areas and in different types of farm settings in order to demonstrate to other farmers how this can work without a compromise of their ownership or their decision-making. It will also show them that they can also forego participation in the partnership model if they wish and without a large cost to themselves as I understand this is a big worry for farmers.

The Deputy is correct in his view on processing capacity. The required investment by the processing sector in Ireland could be measured in hundreds of millions of euro over the next ten years in order to deal with the increased volumes of milk. We must face the fact there has been no investment at all in dealing with extra volume of milk since the mid-1980s, since quotas were introduced. We still produce 5 billion litres of milk every year, just as we did in the mid-1980s. I acknowledge there is an issue. As quotas are phased out we will also see contracts being phased in. In other words, there will not be an unbridled expansion of milk production as farmers will not be able to produce whatever they want and expect it to be bought and collected from their yards. We will need to have some kind of contract or supply model or a co-operative model to respond to an absence of quotas. The challenge is to ensure that this is provided in all parts of the country so that farmers will have an opportunity to expand.

Two brief questions from Deputies Moynihan and Durkan.

I refer to Deputy Naughten's question about peripheral regions. There has been an acknowledgement of the counties where dairying is to be expanded and this has been referred to in the House on many occasions. Over the past 30 to 35 years, there has been a significant movement away from agricultural production on the western seaboard and in peripheral regions. There are parishes where half the land is afforested. The dairy industry was the industry that began the co-operative movement in some of the poorer regions of the country and it was the mainstay of the western side of the country. With the abolition of quotas we must ensure that the dairy industry and milk production is maintained in these peripheral regions. As the Minister has acknowledged on several occasions this is not just an economic policy but also a social policy. We have to ensure that these regions are garnered and while they may not have the most fertile land or cash-efficient production methods, these societies have a value and they should be encouraged to continue in agricultural production.

I strongly support the views expressed by the previous speaker. The Minister and Deputy Naughten have identified a very important issue. The Leas-Cheann Comhairle will be pleased to know that my grandfather, born in 1865, supplied milk to the establishment now called Connacht Gold. Depopulation in rural Ireland was the issue at the time and there was a need to counteract the impact of social deprivation and constriction. The views of Sir Horace Plunkett are still true to this day. I ask if these views might be implemented by way of more co-operation and a re-introduction of the co-operative system to ensure that the basic family farm producer is not ostracised and pushed out of the system. Provision should be made for two concepts, the viability of that unit and the need to ensure that rural parts of this country retain an economic value and are not regarded solely from the point of view of tourism. Given the Minister recognises the importance of the situation, I ask if he will use his good offices with his European colleagues to ensure that this concept is promoted to the greatest extent possible because it will lead ultimately to greater employment.

The last two speakers made comments rather than asked questions.

It prompted a question and an answer.

The difference between politicians and economists is that we have a social responsibility as well as an economic one to ensure the country has a functioning economy and also a society that functions.

This is why I have repeatedly said that I have a dual priority. The first is to meet the targets in Food Harvest 2020. The second is to develop the potential of a significant opportunity for increased agri-food production while at the same time trying to support parts of the country which do not have the capacity to avail of the opportunities for growth because of farm size, fertility of land and a series of other restrictions, such as SAC designation.

However, we must work to increase the productivity and efficiency of small farms and smallholdings with limitations in land type and fertility. We must encourage farming communities to improve their production in order to gain from the market. There is a vast difference to be noted between efficient dairy farmers and those who are less efficient but on similar types of holdings. There is a significant difference between good and bad farming. This holds as much for disadvantaged areas as for the fertile fields of east Cork. It is a case of ensuring that everybody can maximise the potential of their holding whatever the challenges and restrictions. Supports are available by means of disadvantaged area payments and through schemes such as AEOS and REPS. We must not lose sight of the fact that for many farmers there is always more to learn about improving the efficiency of their holdings. This could result in a more sustainable and exciting growth story in the agri-sector.

If I may ask a brief supplementary question.

Sorry, Deputy, we are over time.

I am only encroaching on my own time for the next question. I have another seven minutes.

That is for the next question.

The last thing we want to do is to suspend the House.

We will not suspend the House. The Deputy may proceed.

While our part of the country may not be as efficient at producing milk as in south Leinster and Munster, when a comparison is made on a European scale we are very efficient in producing milk in our region. With regard to the peripheral areas of this country, can some form of a mechanism be put in place to bring the processes together? It would mean bringing together those involved in the industry to see where the bottlenecks exist and what steps could be taken. My fear is that post the quota regime, the big processors in the southern half of the country will speed ahead — the best of luck to them — and dramatically increase capacity but the region I represent will be pushed out of the industry altogether. We do not want to see this happen.

I do not want to see that happening either. I believe we will see dramatic expansion in south Leinster and Munster although there are parts of Munster that have similar challenges to parts of Connacht. It is important not to label entire regions as being either productive or non-productive. It is very much a patchwork quilt.

If we are to meet the targets laid out in the Food Harvest document expansion is required in the west, north-west and midlands and in parts of Munster. The expansion in the latter may not be quite as dramatic but it is required. There is already much talk within the processing sector, four years away from consolidation, as well as an examination of ways in which we can get more efficiency into the processing sector. This is not only about trying to get efficiency at farm level. We need to ask ourselves whether we have the right model in terms of the number of processors in place, where they are geographically and whether we can encourage consolidation in that sector in a sustainable way. Ultimately, these processors are all privately owned and run and are not controlled by the State. We talk to them and will continue to do so even more as part of the implementation group within Food Harvest. Some of the processors are represented on that group.

We also talk to the Irish Dairy Board on a regular basis regarding its views on the matter. I assure the Deputy there is no shortage of consultation.

Food Labelling

Denis Naughten

Ceist:

10 Deputy Denis Naughten asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if he is satisfied with the implementation of country of origin labelling; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [31631/11]

Responsibility for the enforcement of general food labelling legislation including country of origin, rests with the Food Safety Authority of Ireland, FSAI, a body under the aegis of the Minister for Health. This is achieved through service contracts between the FSAI and the relevant agencies including the Health Service Executive, the local authority veterinary service, the Sea Fisheries Protection Authority and my Department.

Under the EU general labelling Directive 2000/13/EC, the place of origin of foodstuffs in circulation within the EU is required to be declared only where failure to provide it would be likely to mislead the consumer. Specific country of origin labelling for beef and veal was introduced under EC Regulation No. 1760/2000, originating with the need for traceability arising from BSE. Certain other products such as honey, fruit and vegetables and olive oil also require origin labelling under EU legislation.

In 2007 my Department submitted draft national legislation to the European Commission that would require the country of origin to be indicated on pigmeat, poultrymeat and sheepmeat and on food products containing over 70% of these meats. A negative opinion was adopted on the grounds that the proposed regulation was not considered to be consistent with the EU labelling directive.

More recently, the EU Commission brought forward proposals on origin labelling as part of a new regulation on information to the consumer. This regulation initially proposed an extension of origin labelling to other products including other meats, dairy products and food ingredients. Following deliberation, it is expected that a proposed regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council will extend country of origin labelling to pork, sheepmeat, poultrymeat and goatmeat with effect from late November 2011. Producers will have a two year transitional period to adopt the regulation. The question of origin labelling for dairy products and meat ingredients will be subject to further review by the Commission.

I welcome the coming legislation. Regarding existing legislation, namely, labelling regulations of 2000, there have been very few prosecutions in that regard. Is the Minister concerned there have been so few? Has any progress been made on the abuse of the existing labelling laws regarding the gaping loophole, otherwise known as substantial transformation, that allows a chicken fillet or pork chop to come from one part of the world and have breadcrumbs put on it in this country, thereby becoming an Irish food product?

I ask the Minister to be brief.

On the second question, that is the reason we are introducing legislation. Essentially, consumers are being misled. That cheap chicken is brought into and processed in Ireland and labelled as an Irish product is something we need to move away from and that is why poultry and pigmeat will be subject to proper country of origin labelling in the not too distant future, as beef is at present. When that happens it will be welcomed strongly by the industry.

Regarding enforcement of existing rules for beef, if people have examples of regulations being flouted I would love to hear about them. We will certainly follow up on them. The Deputy raised a particular company with me and we followed it up with the result that the company now has very clear labelling within the premises. I do not wish to give out its name as that would be unfair.

It has improved its situation.

Whether it improved as a result of our questioning or was doing so in any case, we will never know but it is compliant now.

I have a related parliamentary question.

I am sorry, Deputy.

I refer to Question No. 385.

Only one question was taken.

It is the same question.

That was a mistake. I entreat the Deputy. The Ceann Comhairle has arrived and we are moving to Topical Issues.

Written Answers follow Adjournment.

Barr
Roinn