Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Joint Committee on Foreign Affairs and Defence díospóireacht -
Tuesday, 14 Nov 2023

Global Humanitarian Response: United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs

Apologies have been received from An Cathaoirleach, Deputy Flanagan, who cannot be here today. Today we welcome Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham, director and head of the Geneva office of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, OCHA, who will brief the committee on the global humanitarian landscape, provide an overview of the office's vital role in the global humanitarian response and outline the long-standing partnership it retains with Ireland. Mr. Rajasingham is available until 5 p.m. today. He is joined by Ms Anja Nitzsche and Mr. Nader Duqmaq. Ms Nitzsche is chief of the partnerships and resource mobilisation branch at OCHA, while Mr. Duqmaq is from the donor desk. We look forward to hearing from them about the issues as outlined. We will hear the opening statements, which will be followed by questions and answers or any clarifications sought by members of the committee. I ask members to be concise in their questions to give all members the opportunity to participate.

Witnesses and members are reminded of the long-standing parliamentary practice that they should not criticise or make charges against any person or entity by name or in such a way as to make him, her or it identifiable or otherwise engage in speech that might be regarded as damaging to the good name of the person or entity. Therefore, if their statements are potentially defamatory in respect of an identifiable person or entity, they will be directed to discontinue their remarks. It is imperative that they comply with any such direction. I remind members that they are only allowed to participate in the meeting if they are physically located on the Leinster House campus. I invite Mr. Rajasingham to make his opening statement.

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

It gives me immense pleasure to be here in Dublin and have the opportunity to address the esteemed members of this committee. Ireland holds a unique and long-standing partnership with the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, known as OCHA. Over the past two days, we have been engaged in fruitful discussions with our valued partner Irish Aid, the Department of Foreign Affairs and Irish NGOs. These meetings have allowed us to delve into critical global humanitarian issues, to exchange perspectives and to discuss our accomplishments and priorities. It has been an invaluable opportunity to strengthen our collaboration and partnership.

The foundation of OCHA's mandate lies in the UN General Assembly Resolution 46/182 of 1991, which outlines our role in co-ordinating the global humanitarian response shaping humanitarian policy and advocating on behalf of the humanitarian community. Guided by the principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality and independence, we collaborate with member states and humanitarian actors worldwide to delivery life-saving assistance to those most in need.

The world's humanitarian challenges continue to intensify at unprecedented levels with a staggering 25 million more people in need of assistance and protection today than at the beginning of this year. In total, about 365 million people now require humanitarian aid and protection. We have set the ambitious goal of addressing and targeting the needs of 255 million among them. It comes as no surprise that these figures have reached such alarming levels.

Conflicts persist. The current horrific humanitarian catastrophe in the occupied Palestinian territories is just one example. New crises also strike swiftly and severely, as shown by the earthquakes in Türkiye, Syria and Afghanistan, and floods in Libya and other regions this year. Meanwhile, the global climate crisis ravages the globe with relentless force, all unfolding against the backdrop of the economic and social damage inflicted by the Covid-19 pandemic.

The financial resources required to address humanitarian needs this year have soared to nearly $56 billion. However, despite the generosity of donors such as Ireland, we have managed to secure only 33% of this amount. This shortfall compels us and our humanitarian partners to confront increasingly difficult choices regarding which programmes to support, with even life-saving activities at risk of budget cuts. Our collective response is approaching a critical juncture. I will highlight three reasons for this. First, we face a dire resource deficit. The gap between humanitarian needs and available funding continues to widen. In the past five years, global humanitarian requirements have nearly doubled, surging from $27.8 billion in 2019 to $56 billion in 2023. However, as of the end of September 2023, we had received less funding compared with the same period in 2022. Humanitarian financing relies on a limited pool of just 20 donors, with the top five donors covering 65% of the funding. Regrettably, the outlook for 2024 appears even more challenging, setting the stage for the most austere financial climate in recent years. This will inevitably result in programme closures at a time when expansion is indispensable.

Second, the regions in which we operate are becoming increasingly volatile and complex. According to the International Committee of the Red Cross, ICRC, last year, there were 524 armed groups of humanitarian concern globally, controlling or influencing areas where approximately 175 million people resided. Additionally, we confront formidable obstacles in many regions, as some governments impose bureaucratic and administrative impediments that hinder our ability to reach their own people in need.

Third, we find ourselves being tasked with an ever-expanding scope of responsibilities, often venturing into areas where our expertise is limited. With today's protracted crises, in many instances with authorities, whether de facto or otherwise, that certain segments of the international community are reluctant to engage with, the humanitarian community is increasingly expected to provide systems and services that traditionally fall under the purview of governments. In this context, the significance of OCHA's mandate has never been more important, and our commitment to stay and deliver in challenging crises remains unwavering.

To give some examples from the past year, in Yemen, OCHA played a crucial role in mobilising international efforts, averting a potential catastrophic environmental emergency by facilitating the replacement of the Safer oil tanker. In Syria, OCHA's efforts resulted in the continuation of vital humanitarian cross-border operations, even following the non-renewal of the Security Council resolution for cross-border aid to north-west Syria. In Afghanistan, OCHA ensured that women and girls continued to have access to humanitarian assistance despite restrictions on women's participation in aid delivery by the de facto authorities. In Ukraine, OCHA played an instrumental role in co-ordinating the implementation of the Black Sea initiative, which allowed approximately 33 million metric tonnes of Ukrainian food exports to reach global markets. OCHA acted as the secretariat for the joint co-ordination centre of this initiative in Istanbul.

Our co-ordination role significantly enhances the efficiency and effectiveness of humanitarian responses. Realising that 20% of crises can be anticipated, OCHA takes the lead in co-ordinating anticipatory action and allocates funding to deliver assistance before these crises unfold. This proactive approach not only mitigates the impact of crises but also enhances overall efficiency. Hunger, floods, droughts, and diseases, for example, cholera, are among the crises that we proactively respond to with our anticipatory action. We actively engage in diplomatic efforts and negotiations to secure humanitarian access. Our civil-military co-ordination teams and humanitarian negotiations experts engage with militaries, de facto authorities, and non-state armed groups to negotiate access and aid to besieged or hard-to-reach communities.

OCHA manages the Central Emergency Response Fund, CERF, and country-based pooled funds to deliver timely life-saving assistance where it is most urgently needed. By early November this year, CERF had allocated $610 million to UN agencies and partners to provide assistance and protection across 40 countries. Some examples include the response to the earthquake in Syria and Türkiye, actions to address rising food insecurity and looming famine across 28 countries and, most recently, contribution to the response to the escalating humanitarian situation in Gaza in the occupied Palestinian territories. With unearmarked funding from generous donors like Ireland last year, CERF provided life-saving assistance to 32.7 million people across 42 countries.

The country-based pooled funds also play a crucial role in providing effective humanitarian assistance in 19 of the most challenging crises worldwide. Donors contribute flexible funding to these funds, channelled through OCHA, which is then allocated to local and international NGOs, including Irish NGOs, as well as UN agencies. By prioritising local implementing partners like community-based organisations and NGOs, OCHA empowers communities to take charge of their own situations. Their involvement includes contributing to the identification of their needs and actively participating in the implementation and monitoring of the humanitarian response. Last year, and with the generous contribution of Ireland, the funds provided assistance to 47 million people. Since 2015, OCHA has allocated more than $120 million from the country-based pooled funds to major Irish NGOs, such as Trócaire, GOAL, Concern, Self Help Africa and others across the globe.

Unearmarked funding for OCHA's core programme provides the essential flexibility to swiftly mobilise resources to places and countries where it might otherwise be challenging to respond promptly. For instance, when the earthquake struck Syria and Türkiye earlier this year, both offices were significantly underfunded, with barely 30% funding in place. A similar situation unfolded in Libya, where we were operating with less than one quarter of the required funding. In such critical scenarios, the value of unearmarked funding becomes evident, enabling OCHA to deploy within 24 hours.

In alignment with our strategic plan, OCHA is committed to drive transformation within the humanitarian system, with a primary focus on enhancing efficiency, fostering innovation, and upholding accountability to the people we serve. In this regard, OCHA is leading a process of reform of how the humanitarian system prioritises needs, empowers local communities, strengthens anticipatory action, and promotes localisation. This process includes piloting an initiative in four countries to empower affected communities and populations to assume a central role in the design of aid programmes, thereby bolstering their resilience.

Ultimately, humanitarian action is only ever a short-term solution. It cannot stand alone. Climate change, conflict and economic instability pose existential challenges that demand improved international collaboration and synergy among the humanitarian, development and peace sectors. We require increased funding for climate adaptation and political resolutions to conflicts. On climate, OCHA will establish a climate window within CERF, which will allow donors to channel climate financing through CERF. I thank Ireland for its commitment to significantly increase its climate financing, which will be pivotal in addressing climate-related challenges.

Global humanitarian needs demand unwavering commitment from governments, donors and the humanitarian community at large. It is our shared responsibility to advocate for, and actively contribute to, alleviating the suffering of those affected by crises around the globe. OCHA will remain committed to co-ordinating the global response on behalf of the humanitarian system to enable it to deliver on its mandate despite all the challenges.

I express my deep appreciation for Ireland's substantial contributions to the humanitarian system and active involvement in alleviating suffering. Whether in Africa, the Sahel or the Middle East, its contributions have been crucial in increasing our reach to affected communities. I convey our gratitude for Ireland's steadfast support to OCHA. Starting with its leadership in the OCHA donor support group and the CERF advisory group, Ireland has garnered strong support to OCHA's role and mandate, and continues to do so. Its flexible financial contributions to our core programme and to the pooled funds greatly enhance our agility and response capacity. They allow us to expand our operational footprint as needed or quickly shift resources when sudden needs arise such as those caused by floods. Ireland's contributions to the pooled funds will allow us to continue working with local and international non-governmental organisations to enhance our collective ability to drive the localisation agenda, empower local communities and build resilience. The world continues to count on principled donors like Ireland. I thank the committee for the opportunity to present to members.

I thank Mr. Rajasingham for his kind remarks regarding Ireland's contribution. We will now take questions from members, starting with Deputy Carthy.

I offer a very warm welcome to the witnesses and thank them for being here. More importantly, I thank their organisation for the work it does across the world and, as the Chair acknowledged, for the kind words in respect of Ireland.

Going to the crux of the point in respect of funding, Mr. Rajasingham mentioned that OCHA's humanitarian financing relies on a limited pool of just 20 donors. Will he confirm that there are 20 states contributing?

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

Yes, that is right. Twenty international states contribute to OCHA. They are the primary donors.

Does that number include Ireland?

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

Ireland is included. There are others but the 20 are the major donors.

What distinguishes a major donor from other donors?

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

It is basically down to the quantity they contribute.

Is that measured as a proportion of GDP or in absolute terms?

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

It is based on the proportion they contribute to our total funding levels.

It is the absolute contribution. It seems scandalous to me that only 20 states are contributing to humanitarian financing.

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

Overall, there are 30 members of our OCHA donors support group but I am referring to the 20 major donors. We have approximately 30 donors overall. Our goal and objective, of course, is to increase that donor base.

The EU currently has 27 member states. Is the EU considered a donor in its own right as one of the 20?

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

Yes, the European Community Humanitarian Office, ECHO, is a major donor to our country operations.

Am I correct that a sizeable number of EU states do not contribute?

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

There are EU member states that do not contribute and there are member states that contribute significantly.

Mr. Rajasingham mentioned that OCHA has less funding in 2023 than it had in 2022, despite significantly increased challenges. This suggests that even among the 20 major donors, some are paying less this year than last.

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

That is correct.

Is Mr. Rajasingham in a position to name those countries?

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

I can name a few but not the entire number. For example, certain countries, because of domestic fiscal pressures, have had to reduce their contributions to OCHA. They include France, Sweden, the UK, ECHO, the Netherlands, Qatar and the USA.

To clarify, they have all reduced their contributions?

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

Yes, but some of them may have new supplementary funding coming into play in the coming period. We do not know how much they will have contributed by the end of the year.

Mr. Rajasingham referenced Ireland as holding a unique and long-standing partnership with his office. What does that mean in real terms? What makes Ireland unique and in what way is its relationship with OCHA different from that of other states?

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

First, Ireland is a very strong strategic partner in that the humanitarian funding it provides is what we call quality financing, which means it is not earmarked for any specific country or activity. It is provided on the basis that the organisation will determine where the priorities lie. We work in extraordinary circumstances, which means we must be ready and agile to respond to new crises as they appear. If funding is earmarked, it restricts our ability to react rapidly to new emerging crises. A good donor has confidence and trust in the humanitarian community and system to make those decisions. We have that trust with Ireland. At the same time, our accountability is very strong. Ireland knows exactly where the money is going, whom it is assisting and how it is assisting them.

Is OCHA involved in providing humanitarian aid to the Democratic Republic of the Congo, DRC?

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

Yes. We receive financing from various donors for the pooled fund for the DRC. Through that, we support NGOs and UN agencies.

I have heard commentary that the situation in the DRC would be much more prevalent in our consciousness were it not for the situations in Palestine and Ukraine, in particular. Does Mr. Rajasingham share that view and, if so, is it hampering OCHA's work? Can he give a brief synopsis of the humanitarian situation in the DRC at the moment?

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

The crisis in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, along with crises in many other countries, such as Myanmar, is very poorly funded. At this point, the DRC has got 16% funding for its overall needs. The Deputy is right that when there are major crises like those in Ukraine, the Gaza Strip and Syria, when it was very prominent a few years back, a lot of the attention and focus goes towards those countries. This is why I said earlier that quality funding to humanitarian organisations to help them determine which needs to address is very helpful. It is why we appreciate Ireland's trust in us.

Mr. Rajasingham referenced engagements his organisation has in diplomatic efforts and negotiations to secure humanitarian access. Has OCHA been involved in such negotiations as they pertain to Gaza at present?

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

Yes. My boss, Martin Griffiths, who is the Under-Secretary General, has travelled to Egypt, Israel, Jordan and Palestine to speak to authorities there and see how access can be facilitated. As a result of some of those discussions, we have been able to get some lorries of assistance into Gaza, but the quantities are minute right now. We are actively involved in negotiations, as is the Secretary General, but the success at this point is not to the desired level.

Are lorries getting in today?

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

Lorries have not got in for the past two days but we have had approximately 1,000 lorries get in over the past 20 days.

A total of 1,000 lorries have got in over the past 20 days. What percentage of the aid that is required does that number represent?

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

I cannot give the Deputy a percentage but I can give an indication. Before the crisis, we would get approximately 500 lorries per day through to provide assistance to the people in Gaza.

Is it fair to say that was happening in circumstances where the humanitarian situation was nowhere near as dire as it is currently?

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

That is before this current conflict. Yes.

The aid that is entering Gaza is a fraction of what is required.

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

Yes. It is a small fraction.

I want to tie in with the situation we were talking about, namely, OCHA's financing needs. I presume the situation in Gaza has put an additional burden on what OCHA requires.

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

Exactly. We have just issued a response plan for Gaza, which amounts to $1.2 billion, and that is to cover the entire needs of the population of Gaza. There are 2.2 million people in Gaza and they are all vulnerable. In addition, we are seeing an increase in the violence on the West Bank, which is also almost unprecedented. Some of that assistance is to provide support to 500,000 people there.

Is that $1.2 billion?

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

Yes.

For a population of 2 million.

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

It is $1.2 billion for 2.7 million people. Some 2.2 million are in Gaza and 500,000 are on the West Bank.

If my maths are correct, OCHA is looking for a little over 50 cents per person for what would be delivered in aid.

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

It is a bit more than 50 cents.

But less than $1.

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

More than $1. It is $1.2 billion, not $1.2 million.

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

That is until the end of this year; it is for three months.

As for OCHA securing that funding back, does it bill the party that caused the humanitarian crisis? Israel is a wealthy country, it is putting a burden on the international community and it is preventing funds from going to other humanitarian crises. Is there a mechanism by which OCHA, through other UN agencies, seeks the funding back from the party that caused the damage that necessitated the humanitarian assistance?

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

We issue the humanitarian response plan and donors respond to that plan. The donors could be anyone but it is customarily these 20 major donors I mentioned. We do not go and actively bill member states for this.

I know OCHA's mandate is based on a UN resolution of 1991, which was in response to the crisis after the Gulf War. Does OCHA see a need to have that mandate renewed and amended with additional frameworks, considering the more modern challenges it is facing?

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

No, it is a bit like international law, in that the mandate is strong. It is respect for our principles in this crisis and place of conflict that is important. It is compliance with the principles of humanitarian assistance that we would like to see strengthened. Those are: humanity; impartiality; neutrality; and independence. This is where we are challenged in many countries because we have a lot of interference with our work and we find it difficult to access humanitarian-affected populations. We are often targeted, despite the fact we are neutral. We are sometimes perceived as not being neutral. Compliance and respect of these principles is more important than changing the text of the resolution.

What is the office's recourse when it identifies humanitarian need and a state such as Israel prevents it from carrying out the response that is required?

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

We advocate with the State of Israel or the state that is responsible. We negotiate with it and urge it to change its policies or whatever is required to allow us to do so. We make remarks to the UN Security Council on the situation to see if it can support us. We advocate with other member states and parties that may have some degree of influence over the decision.

Mr. Rajasingham mentioned the deteriorating situation on the West Bank and the additional challenges that is presenting to OCHA. Could Mr. Rajasingham elaborate on that? Could he further comment on reports that the Israel Defense Force is arming and providing support to what has been described as settler terrorism in attacks on habitations and smaller municipal districts that would traditionally have been considered the homes of Palestinians? What impact is that having on OCHA's work?

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

I cannot confirm how the settlers are armed. I have heard and seen the reports the Deputy has mentioned but we cannot confirm them. We can confirm that there has been an increase in settler violence and in the number of people killed over this period. That has increased dramatically in the last month.

I welcome Mr. Rajasingham and his team and I thank them for the work they do. My first question is about OCHA's people on the ground, the danger they are in and whether they have experienced injury, death and imprisonment.

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

In Gaza?

Anywhere. OCHA's remit is global.

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

We have faced numerous problems and humanitarians have increasingly been targeted in conflict situations. The Deputy may have seen several reports in recent years on the targeting of health professionals in north-west Syria. Similarly, we have had that experience in Afghanistan and we have seen many of our colleagues pass and be killed recently in Gaza, for example. Throughout all these conflicts an increased number of aid workers have been killed in the line of duty and sometimes in their homes as well. It seems that in the past few years, the incidence of this has risen and there has almost been a loss of innocence in terms of respect for the principles under which we operate.

It is terrible to hear that people who go to save lives and help those who are suffering are themselves targeted. I can understand how people might be killed accidentally but if people are targeted deliberately, that is a separate matter completely. Mr. Rajasingham mentioned a loss of innocence. Why has this changed? What has changed?

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

Our position and principles remain steadfast and have remained the same over the years. However, there is a perception that international humanitarian and aid workers are not necessarily neutral. This perception has increased, especially among armed groups. As a result these armed groups have targeted us.

I thank Mr. Rajasingham for his presentation and I note he spoke about engaging in diplomatic efforts and negotiations to secure humanitarian access. He further mentioned that OCHA engages "with militaries, de facto authorities, and non-state armed groups to negotiate access and aid to besieged or hard-to-reach communities". Does that mean that OCHA talks to virtually anybody and does the best it can to keep all lines of communication open or are there groups that OCHA refuses to talk to, for whatever reason?

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

Within the framework of our principles we want to assert the right of humanitarian aid workers, in the course of our work, to speak to whoever impedes or affects humanitarian vulnerability.

So there is no one that OCHA has ruled out. Its principle is to keep negotiating, discussing and engaging.

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

Yes.

Mr. Rajasingham talks about a pilot initiative in four countries to empower affected populations to assume a central role in the design of aid programmes. Can he tell us a bit more about that? Where are these countries and what exactly is happening there? It seems interesting.

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

It is fascinating. The four countries are the Philippines, South Sudan, Niger in west Africa and Colombia. All four of them are vastly different in respect of the situation on the ground and the environment there. The purpose of our exercise and what we would like to better understand, as opposed to believing what we know is best for the population on the ground, is to have them tell us what they need.

From my experience this is primarily with respect to women, women-led organisation and mothers. They have to be a much more credible source of information but they also have a much better understanding of what is needed for a community to rise up and stand on its own feet as opposed to relying on humanitarian assistance year in year out. We want them to take a leadership role in this. That does mean a change of attitude among our partners, yes.

This is a pilot. When does OCHA expect to see results or findings from this pilot published?

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

Right now, we are undertaking a monitoring, evaluation and learning exercise from the experience. That will go through the entire year of 2024. We just began it this year. We will monitor it through 2024 and by the end of 2024, we will have some lessons learned. Those that work out will then be imparted to the other operations as well.

I also note that OCHA is establishing what it calls a climate window within the CERF, with donors to channel financing through the CERF. That is also very interesting. When will that happen? Will Mr. Rajasingham say a little more about it?

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

We will announce it on 3 December at COP in the United Arab Emirates.

That is interesting. My colleague spoke about five donors covering 65% of the funding. I noticed that quite a few wealthy countries do not contribute much.

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

Sorry?

My colleague spoke about five donors covering 65% of the funding. Mr. Rajasingham referred to it too. Ireland is in the top 20 countries. Many countries contribute little or nothing. Why is that? Has OCHA made efforts to encourage more countries to give more? It seems a lot of these countries would be well able to give a lot more.

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

Just to clarify, this is for the entire humanitarian system, not just OCHA, so these are the major donor countries. A lot of it depends on government policy in those countries. Some of those countries, for example, have earmarked let us say 0.7% of gross national income or GDP for international assistance. Some countries do not have that in law or the figure is lower. Some countries have lowered it over the past years mainly because of domestic fiscal pressures they face as a result of the economic impact of Covid-19. The Deputy is absolutely right, however. For some countries, the humanitarian funding nature and DNA are not necessarily there. We have expanded and are expanding our efforts to make sure we can bring them on board. This includes the Gulf countries. It is not to say they are not necessarily contributing but that they are not contributing to us. They may be doing it through other channels. They have their own organisations through which they do it. We are also approaching countries in Asia and, for example, the BRICS - Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa - to see if we can improve those funding channels as well.

Mr. Rajasingham mentioned there are 524 armed groups of humanitarian concern globally. That seems like an awful lot of armed groups globally.

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

I think that is an underestimation.

It is an underestimation.

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

Yes.

Does Mr. Rajasingham reckon there are more?

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

To be honest, yes. In many cases, an armed group splinters into three or four groups depending on individual personalities. We do not always know who they are, so sometimes when we do get access from a specific person and then get to a checkpoint we realise that person is no longer in charge because someone else in the organisation has created another armed element.

I note from OCHA publications that the largest refugee camp in the world is in Bangladesh, with 640,000 people.

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

Yes.

I take it they are mainly Rohingya refugees. Places like that often slip down the timetable or storyline of the media and are forgotten about. Does it concern Mr. Rajasingham that there are so many people like that in many parts of the world who are not highlighted or not known and they slip down very quickly? At the moment, Ukraine has slipped down because what is happening in Gaza has taken prominence. There are so many other places across the globe where people are suffering and dying, yet we know nothing about it.

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

I could not agree more with the Deputy. The Cox's Bazar refugee camp is horrible. It is terrible. It is a refugee camp in a country that is already suffering its own development challenges. Bangladesh has been called on to provide protection and support in addition to what the donors provide. I entirely agree with the Deputy. Just a few weeks ago, for example, more than 100,000 people were displaced in eastern Congo. I only know about it because my colleagues report on it but I did not see it anywhere in the press. Meanwhile, if 100,000 people were displaced in other countries, we would know about it. There is some form of discrimination in terms of the news coverage of these situations.

We in Ireland are insulated from a lot of things. We are so far away from them, although we welcome a lot of people seeking international protection and so on. It appears from Mr. Rajasingham's overall presentation that, globally, things are getting worse, not better.

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

Yes.

There is not much hope in that. I thank Mr. Rajasingham and his team for the work they do on the ground. They are very brave. In Mr. Rajasingham's experience, if a child is in one of these camps for many years, is there any hope afterwards given the impact and the damage done? Surely the life chances that have been lost and squandered are incalculable.

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

That cannot be calculated at all. It can also have adverse developments in those communities because, for example, because when people have no opportunities, education or access to livelihoods and employment they are much more vulnerable to being recruited by extremist groups. We see this in the Sahel, for example. It is devastating to think about a child being brought up in an environment like that. Every day is a struggle. For those mothers, it is a matter of hoping that when dinner time comes all of their children will be around the table. Many of them live in situations, such as in Gaza today, where they do not know whether their children will be alive later in the day. I have a Palestinian colleague who works in my organisation whose wife has lost 17 members of her extended family in Gaza. I cannot even imagine what these people go through.

Linked to that, there is of course the growth of modern slavery, sex trafficking and so on, which is also a huge worry. I am sure OCHA staff have come across that as well. I will finish by thanking Mr. Rajasingham and his team globally for the work they do and the risk they take. I wish them well.

I welcome our visitors. Like my colleagues, I thank them for the work they do and note, as the previous speaker did, the risk and dangers their people experience. I will make an attempt to cover all areas or facets of the presentation. Mr. Rajasingham spoke about Afghanistan. I was invited recently to speak at a seminar on Afghanistan so I got to know a little more about it did previously while I was preparing. Mr. Rajasingham said OCHA managed to get access to aid for women and girls despite the fact they are excluded from public life, effectively, by virtue of the regime. Will he expand on that and on the need in Afghanistan?

Related to that, I felt when I did my study of Afghanistan for the seminar I was attending that there is now a case for the West removing sanctions because the regime is not beatable, is being supported by all its neighbours and the only people suffering under the sanctions are ordinary people. Insofar as Mr. Rajasingham's role allows him to comment on that, I ask him to do so?

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

In Afghanistan our funding coverage now is approximately 33%. It is more or less average for the situation but it is still very low because the average is very low. There are 29 million people in need and we are targeting 21 million of them, which means the vast majority of the population is vulnerable.

We have good capacity on the ground in Afghanistan. We have good access to the population. There are the restrictions, however, that have been imposed by the de facto authority there on women. We have different levels of success in supporting women and girls throughout the country depending on the provinces they are in and depending on the programmes. We are making all efforts to find ways to reach them. We have to be inventive and innovative but we cannot give up on them.

Does Mr. Rajasingham feel that his UN office is succeeding and making progress there?

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

We are making progress in some areas. We are making nowhere near the progress that we would like but we do have examples of progress in some areas. The challenges are enormous, absolutely.

Is it fair to ask, or is it outside the terms of reference allowed, if Mr. Rajasingham feels that the sanctions are helping or hurting no one only the ordinary people?

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

I cannot comment so much on the sanctions.

Okay. I can understand that. It was my sense of it that this is all that is being affected.

I will move to Ukraine for a moment. With the focus gone off Ukraine now in the international media, where is the UN at in terms of addressing humanitarian needs there? In his presentation Mr. Rajasingham referred to the Black Sea initiative getting the grain out. Is there a difficulty with that in latter times or is that still okay? Will he comment a bit more on Ukraine?

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

Ukraine is 51% funded so is among the better funded programmes that we have. We have targeted and are supporting 11 million of the 17 million people we have identified as needing assistance. This means 11 million of the highest priority people. We are relatively successfully in targeting and supporting those populations. We do not have access to the eastern part of the country, which is controlled by Russia, and the affected population there that we have not been able to support in the past year or so.

The Black Sea grain deal right now has been suspended.

That is right. I had heard that.

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

It was very successful when it was operational with 33 million tonnes of food shipped through that. This has contributed to addressing some of the food crises elsewhere by lowering the price and providing wheat to some of those critical countries.

Is Mr. Rajasingham in anyway hopeful about being able to restore that?

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

We are continuously working to see if we can restore it yes.

The witness has answered a lot of questions around Gaza already. The situation for the UN aid workers in Gaza is shocking. I offer my sincere sympathy for them collectively on this. I offer our deepest sympathy. It is shocking to see that civilians are dying there and children are dying. Any death is dreadful but it is horrendous altogether that the UN aid workers are dying in this. Will Mr. Rajasingham comment a little more about this? How many of those workers are there? Is there freedom for aid workers to leave? What kind of protocols has the UN around the future for its aid workers? Does Mr. Rajasingham know if they want to go or are they locked in? What kind of exit, egress and entry have they? How free are they? Of all the numbers who have died, it is a horror for the UN to see its people dying there.

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

More than 100 UN aid workers have died in this conflict and many more non-UN aid workers as well. These were colleagues with whom we co-operated and worked as well. Many of our colleagues and their families have also moved south, which is supposed to be a safer area but still there is conflict going on there and people are being killed there as well in large numbers. At this point, I understand that 600 people have been evacuated from Gaza but they are mainly either dual nationals or nationals of another country.

An aid worker of the UN who wishes to leave at the moment could well be a prisoner and not free to go. Is that the dreadful reality?

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

For the most part many of our colleagues want to stay and work there. It is not necessarily that this is the case. If someone is Gazan, however, it is difficult to leave, yes.

It is shocking. As a parent myself I can imagine that the families of these idealistic people who are doing the UN work might be trying to pull them home, in some instances.

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

That happens.

There is a problem now in the West Bank as well. Mr. Rajasingham did not comment on Jerusalem but he might do so. Perhaps he will also comment a little more, and then I will also have one last point on climate change. How big is the need on the West Bank? Maybe I did not pick up correctly what the witness said about the West Bank.

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

We are targeting nearly 500,000 people in the West Bank with humanitarian assistance. These are people who have either lost their homes or who need basic assistance in education, health, water and sanitation. In that sense, 500,000 people are-----

It is a lot of people.

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

It is a lot of people and life for some is difficult as a result of the current situation there in the West Bank.

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

In Jerusalem, there are instances of people losing their homes through the planning regulations that have been imposed on them. In that sense and where we can we do provide assistance to those communities as well.

I thank the Chair for the time. I have a final question and then I must excuse myself as I have to attend the Chamber. I presume that when Mr. Rajasingham says he will address climate change he means, from his perspective, that he is only addressing the results of climate disasters. They are not putting up flood resistance. They are just dealing with the results. Is that the case?

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

Yes, it is. We deal with the symptoms and the results of climate change but we would prefer to do anticipatory actions. A lot of the financing that we encourage now is for anticipatory action to-----

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

Exactly. If, for example, we see that floods happen on a regular basis because rains have changed or meteorological events have changed what does one do to prepare the population affected by that to absorb that shock, to remain where they are, and not to be displaced so they can continue their live? That is the most efficient and effective use of money.

I had not realised this was in the UN brief.

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

We want to do that in a greater extent than we can today.

I thank Mr. Rajasingham.

I also thank Mr. Rajasingham. He is very welcome to Ireland and to our committee. I would also like to give my condolences towards the families of more than 100 UN workers who have lost their lives. The committee's brief also covers the Department of Defence. The 122nd and the 123rd battalion of peacekeepers are currently in rotation in south Lebanon. We all have skin in the game, as such. I thank Mr. Rajasingham for the work the UN does locally there.

My colleagues referred to people losing interest in conflicts. That reflects a polarisation of politics and short attention spans and all that. What is Mr. Rajasingham's experience of this when things are happening far away? How does he intend to work on that in terms of the 20 top donor countries that he mentioned? Yemen was not mentioned at all in his opening statement. We have discussed Yemen at this committee and certainly at the climate committee as well. Perhaps Mr. Rajasingham would speak to that.

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

We have different ways of addressing what we call "underfunded situations". Generally speaking, the underfunded situations are the ones that have less attention globally. We have a very specific window in the central emergency response fund, CERF, and those funds are directed towards underfunded emergencies.

I think it is twice a year that we have an assessment analysis of these areas. We have less than the standard funding that we have for other countries and we direct funding towards that. I think that is one way of addressing this issue of the silent areas.

I briefly mentioned Yemen earlier when I mentioned the Safer oil tanker, which was a rusting vessel lying idle in the sea, but contained millions of gallons of oil. There would have been a massive ecological and environmental disaster and we focused a lot of our work on that. Yemen is a huge operation for us. I neglected to mention the other aspects of that operation and the Deputy is absolutely right to highlight that. There are tens of millions of people in need in Yemen. We have a strong office and capacity in terms of the humanitarian community to address those needs. We had a few years of very good funding there. Like all the other countries, it has also suffered from significantly reduced funding recently.

People in Ireland have a huge affinity with the people of Palestine. It is something that we have taken to our hearts so I will ask about Palestine and anticipatory actions. In the olden days and medieval times invaders, while they surrounded a city, would throw in decaying bodies of animals or humans to spread disease in the area. That seems to be what is going on in Gaza now because both water and sewerage systems have been cut off. Last night, in media reports, I saw grotesque images of decaying human bodies waiting to be buried and dogs eating them. It is horrendous to think that these atrocities are happening around our Mediterranean Sea. Over 11,000 people have died but many thousands of people are buried in the rubble and UNOCHA will have to go through all of these areas before even considering rebuilding Gaza. Has Mr. Rajasingham thought about a financial plan and how much it will cost to rebuild Gaza when the Israelis and the Likud Party have taken their vengeance on the civilian population?

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

I have mentioned the humanitarian response plan of $1.2 billion. That is relief assistance, which, by its nature, is a very short-term first aid response to help lives and sustain lives as well.

On the broader issue of recovery and repair of everything that has been destroyed or damaged in Gaza, the assessment would generally happen after the conflict has come to an end, so that one can have a proper assessment of the extent of the damage, the cost, etc. That is within the domain of the development actors who do this, and not the humanitarian actors. Our partners in the development field would conduct a damaged needs assessment. Based on that, they would also provide a response plan and an appeal for what needs to be repaired and how much it would cost. I suspect that the cost will be enormous.

Yes. An awful lot of EU and UN funding goes into Gaza and the occupied territories. The EU should look after itself. I know the conflict has never been quite this bad but has the UN ever considered suing for the destruction of UN facilities and infrastructure?

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

We generally do not but it is possible in some cases where a specific UN structure has been hit or targeted.

Would Israel being brought to the International Criminal Court and found to be in breach of international law have any bearing on the UN's ability to sue?

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

As a humanitarian, I would not comment on that and I would not know how to comment on that either. Our primary focus, within the principles of our work, is to provide relief assistance to the most affected.

Yes. Regarding climate change, there are parts of the world that are not in need of humanitarian aid but they might be not too far into the future.

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

Yes.

What strategies does the UN have and what can it do to sound alarm bells about such need? Spain and Italy experienced drought this year while Ireland had the opposite problem of too much water. The area of land where we can grow food is getting smaller as deserts encroach.

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

The Deputy is absolutely right. Our focus primarily is on those most vulnerable countries where climate intersects with conflict, poor governance and insecurity. The Deputy is right that there are countries outside that sphere that are only affected by climate. Development actors would need to provide prevention, preparedness and disaster reduction programming.

I thank Mr. Rajasingham and his colleague for attending this meeting.

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

I thank the Deputy.

On behalf of the committee, I thank Mr. Rajasingham for meeting various members of the committee today and comprehensively answering their questions. On behalf of the extended Oireachtas, I thank Mr. Rajasingham for the work done by his office especially, as many members said, considering the risk and danger. He and his colleagues put themselves in the line of danger. The information that he and his office gather and relay and its report mechanisms to bodies such as ours contributes greatly and significantly to the response, and not only from a monetary perspective but in terms of issues of great concern to many of us, that we see and witness, especially in the last number of weeks. It is devastating to say the least to watch this unfold. To think that we have mechanisms in place that refer to the manner in which these atrocities are carried out, the thin line between defending oneself and waging war on children, as relayed earlier, is something we cannot lose sight of.

We implore the UNOCHA and all other actors in the area to use the powers available to them to ensure the conflict comes to an end as soon as it is practically possible. We have seen in our own country the role that hatred can play and how it disintegrates into something unconscionable which, as Deputy Cronin said, we saw on our screens in recent nights. It is imperative that reason eventually grabs hold, and that time and space is given to look again at some of the solutions that maybe were not given the chance and opportunity to succeed. I hope that the efforts of UNOCHA and our efforts, in whatever role we play, are used to best possible ends, which is peace.

Mr. Ramesh Rajasingham

I thank the Leas-Cathaoirleach and we appreciate the support of the Government for all our work. I thank the committee for this opportunity.

This meeting is adjourned until Tuesday, 21 November, when we meet with Dóchas to discuss its reaction to budget 2024, official development assistance, spending in 2024 and a look ahead at COP28. Dóchas will update the committee on humanitarian situations relating to its remit.

The joint committee adjourned at 4.30 p.m. until 3.15 p.m. on Tuesday, 21 November 2023.
Barr
Roinn