Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Joint Committee on Health díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 15 Nov 2023

Awareness, Prevention and Services for the Treatment of Sepsis: Discussion

The purpose of today's meeting is to consider awareness, preventative measures and services for the treatment of sepsis. The meeting will be divided into two sessions. The committee will first meet with representatives from the Irish Sepsis Foundation, End Sepis, and Lil Red's Legacy Sepsis Awareness Campaign, following which it will meet with representatives from the HSE.

To commence the meeting's consideration of this matter, I am pleased to welcome Ms Doireann O’Mahony, chairperson, and Mr. Conor Callaghan from the Irish Sepsis Foundation; Ms Orlaith Staunton and Mr. Ciarán Staunton, End Sepsis; and Ms Karen Phoenix and Mr. Joe Hughes, Lil Red's Legacy Sepsis Awareness Campaign.

Witnesses are reminded of the long-standing parliamentary practice that they should not criticise or make charges against a person or entity by name or in such a way as to make him, her or it identifiable or otherwise engage in speech that might be regarded as damaging to the good name of the person or entity. Therefore, if their statements are potentially defamatory in relation to an identifiable person or entity, they will be directed to discontinue their remarks. It is imperative that they comply with any such direction.

Members are also reminded of the long-standing parliamentary practice to the effect that they should not comment on, criticise or make charges against a person outside the Houses or an official either by name or in such a way as to make him or her identifiable. I also remind members of the constitutional requirement that they must be physically present within the confines of the Leinster House complex to participate in public meetings. I will not permit members to participate where they are not adhering to this constitutional requirement. Therefore, any member who attempts to participate from outside the precincts will be asked to leave the meeting. In this regard, I ask any members taking part via MS Teams to confirm, prior to making their contribution to the meeting, that they are on the grounds of the Leinster House campus.

We have received opening statements from our witnesses. They have been circulated to members and will be shown on our website. In the interests of enabling witnesses and the members to contribute to the meeting I invite our guests to concentrate on key issues in their opening statements. The opening statements will be read into the record anyway so perhaps there are a number of points they may wish to highlight and that is up to themselves. T o commence our consideration of the dangers of sepsis, I invite Ms O'Mahony to make her opening remarks on behalf of the Irish Sepsis Foundation. She is very welcome.

Ms Doireann O'Mahony

On behalf of the Irish Sepsis Foundation, I thank the committee for the invitation to attend this very important occasion. As Ireland’s only sepsis charity we are delighted to see the issue closest to our hearts being put firmly on the political agenda this morning.

The Irish Sepsis Foundation was set up in September 2022. We have all been given a lot of hope and energy by the progress that we have made during that short time span. As a not-for-profit organisation we rely solely on the goodwill of our members and volunteers, all of whom have been affected by sepsis in some way, and all of whom share a very firm and strong commitment to furthering our goal of better survival rates and a better quality of life for those who survive sepsis. We all believe that the more people in Ireland who know about sepsis, the safer everybody will be.

I am accompanied by our member, Mr. Conor Callaghan, who is a sepsis survivor. I think it is important to hand over to him to hear what he has to say.

Mr. Conor Callaghan

I am 24 years old. Last March, I contracted sepsis - I was diagnosed after five days in hospital - which led to a bleed on the brain. I had an aneurysm from which I was meant to be left paralysed down my left side. Luckily, that clotted off and I am still here, and I am not paralysed. I spent a total of 12 weeks in hospital. Two valves in my heart were damaged, which required me to have open-heart surgery twice during my stay of 12 weeks. I felt that there was nowhere to go in hospital, nowhere to turn to and no one to talk to about my experience. I truly hope that correct procedures are put in place and that if anyone else has to go through this, they will not be alone.

Ms Doireann O'Mahony

I hope that everyone now appreciates that sepsis does not discriminate. Anybody can develop sepsis at any time. That is why it is so important that we are here today and why we continue to highlight the time-dependent nature of this deadly condition.

Conor is considered by many to have been one of the lucky ones. In certain ways he is but that is also why his experience, strength and hope is something that we all need to listen to and hear about. We believe that the HSE must not only to listen to survivors and bereaved people but really hear what they have to say. Listening to them is often the only thing required to help someone. We implore the HSE to do the following: pay attention; show that it is listening; defer judgment and respond appropriately. The response is the most important. We owe it to anyone who has been directly and indirectly affected by sepsis to do better. We believe that it is only by having proper risk management strategies throughout Ireland's hospitals that there will be any meaningful change and lessons learned. It is only through that we drive down the rate of mortality and morbidity from sepsis.

Finally, I thank the committee for the opportunity to be here.

I thank Ms O'Mahony and invite Mr. Staunton to make his presentation. He is very welcome.

Mr. Ciarán Staunton

Dia daoibh go léir. Níl aon áthas orainn a bheith anseo mar go bhfuil ár mac marbh.

Orlaith and I, along with our daughter, Kathleen, came by our son's grave this morning and that was a preventable trip. His death was preventable. When I spoke in Ireland in 2014 there were 1,851 preventable sepsis deaths and, in 2021, the number had increased to 2,700. We know the families who are here. We know that 15-year-old Lil Red's death was preventable, and his mum and dad are here. We know that the death of James Corcoran's sister, Tracey, was preventable and she left two young children behind. We also know that 42% of hospital beds in Ireland are filled with patients with either sepsis or infection. That is the reality of the numbers.

I thank the Chairman and this committee for hosting these historic hearings. I thank him for inviting my wife, Orlaith, myself and our daughter, Kathleen, to be here today because these are not numbers we are talking about. They are people. They are sons, daughters, sisters and brothers. I want to underline the word "preventable". These are preventable deaths, a preventable buying of coffins and preventable funerals.

My name is Ciarán Staunton. I am from County Mayo and my wife, Orlaith, is from County Louth. Our daughter, Kathleen, is with us. Kathleen was only ten years old when she had to bury her brother, Rory. Many of the members know our tragic story because his death should never have happened. It should never have happened anywhere in the world. What we have tried to do, and will continue to do, is try to ensure that what happened to our son in New York should not happen anywhere ever.

Rory Staunton was 12 years old when he died. Rory loved Ireland and came here every summer. He travelled from Ballydavid to Westport to Drogheda. Indeed, he was a guest here in the Dáil on many occasions with his uncle, Deputy Fergus O'Dowd. Rory is an Irish citizen and is buried with his grandparents in Drogheda.

I have given many speeches about Rory's death and our campaign. I will never be able to verbalise the hell every time we give the speech and we walk by his grave, which is a preventable graveside, because we are talking about the loss of a child, and the struggle to keep going. The last line of our speech continues always to be "his life could have been saved". When we were invited here by the committee we said "yes, it would be appropriate". As one can see from the statistics handed out by the HSE the numbers are increasing and the line that displays fatalities is ever increasing. These are "preventable" fatalities.

I will now hand over to my wife, Orlaith.

Ms Orlaith Staunton

I will tell the committee a little about Rory. He was a very healthy child. We are not talking about a situation where a child was immunocompromised or anything else. He was very healthy. He was 5 ft 9 in. tall, with big shoulders. He was a big kid.

What happened was that when he was playing basketball one day he fell and cut himself, resulting in a very slight scrape on his arm. Overnight he spiked a fever. We brought him to his doctor who said it was a gastric flu, but because he needed some fluids she sent him to one of the top hospitals in New York. We took him to the emergency department there, where staff concurred with her that it was a gastric flu. We brought him home but his symptoms worsened. We contacted the doctor - this is a familiar story for everyone here - and she said that it was still a flu and not to worry about it. That was on Friday. He fell on Wednesday. We brought him to the hospital on Friday night and he died in the ICU on Sunday evening. When we were told that Rory had died from sepsis, we had never heard the word. It was even more devastating for us when we found out that if his condition had been accurately diagnosed as sepsis when we first sought medical attention for him with his doctor or with the hospital, he would be alive today.

Since Rory's death, we have heard so many different versions of this story repeated again and again, specifically in Ireland with Lil Red and others. It is always parents or loved ones who have never heard of sepsis. Their loved ones' symptoms were missed and their concerns dismissed by healthcare providers. Rory spoke loud and clear when he was ill. He said, "I have a pain here and here. I don't feel well". Nobody listened to him. No matter how much I or his dad tried to get them to listen, they would not listen. I think that is the same the world over. It is not specific to New York. When Rory died, we thought this was just completely wrong. I never thought there was anything that could kill my child so fast that I did not even know the name of.

We then discovered that sepsis affects 1.7 million Americans every year, of whom a huge portion, 350,000, die. When Rory died, we embarked on a campaign to end these preventable deaths. In New York state, we started working with the department of health and hospitals there because we believe it has to be a coalition of hospitals, government or state officials and patient advocates. We worked with them and in 2013 they instituted Rory's regulations, which are a series of measures and protocols for the recognition and treatment of sepsis. Accompanying those regulations was a parents' bill of rights. The one thing I felt was that nobody heard me or listened to me. Before a child can be discharged from the emergency room in New York state, it has to be explained why that diagnosis of the child, or any other diagnosis that may have been considered, has been come to. At least that opens us all to understanding that there might be something lurking that we do not know about. In 2016, Rory Staunton's law was passed in the state. That is essentially about professionals working in healthcare, everyone from dentists to healthcare workers to doctors and nurses, having to complete sepsis coursework specifically in sepsis prevention.

We have met many of the people in New York whose lives we have saved. There is a huge number of them. Some 20,000 have been saved in four years. We also reduced paediatric sepsis deaths by 40% in those four years. We would like to see sepsis regulations expanded around the world. We would like to see all children have the same right to life. We do not think that the level of care that anybody receives should be different. If we can get regulations in place, no one needs to die from sepsis because it is a preventable death.

Mr. Joseph Hughes

I thank the committee for having us. The ground-breaking work done by Rory's family and the Irish Sepsis Foundation has been a great source of information and help for us as a family. Ms Phoenix will take over shortly. I have a cognitive impairment and my speech might be a little slurred or slow, but I will state a few things before handing over to Ms Phoenix.

Lil Red's Legacy Sepsis Awareness Campaign was set up in 2018 as a direct result of our son's sudden and preventable death from sepsis. We never heard of sepsis before it stole our son's life. It is now our mission to empower the public with the knowledge of how to recognise the biggest killer in the world. Lil Red's campaign came before the Joint Committee on Public Petitions in early March this year. We got great feedback from that and were very happy with it. The HSE were called before that committee shortly after that in April. We have been in Leinster House twice to give sepsis awareness presentations. We were very happy to have that opportunity.

The Irish public are being denied and deprived of a national sepsis awareness campaign that is available in other countries. Does the Irish public not deserve this? Of course they do. Responsibility and accountability need to be taken by the HSE. The information needs to be out there. There is no point having it on websites. It should be in parents' hands.

I am sorry; I am getting a little flustered and I will hand over to Ms Phoenix.

Ms Karen Phoenix

I thank the committee for having us. Seán Hughes, aka Lil Red: sunrise 3 July 2002 and sunset 12 January 2018. Seán was an up and coming rap artist who wrote and performed all his own material. He performed in the Aviva Stadium, Croke Park and the National Concert Hall to name just a few. Seán’s music can be heard on Facebook, SoundCloud and YouTube. He was a very fashion-conscious young man. He loved to be dressed in the latest designer brands. Friends of Seán have called him their role model. He was quick to help others and we are very proud to call him our son. Seán had no underlying health issues. He was a healthy lad. On Friday morning, 12 January 2018, we lost our amazing son, Seán Hughes, aka Lil Red, due to sepsis. Seán was only 15 years old. We had never heard of sepsis before it took Seán from us. Now we are doing all we can to raise public awareness about the dangers of the silent serial killer called sepsis.

There are almost 15,000 cases of sepsis in Ireland each year resulting in almost 3,000 deaths. A staggering 60% of all hospital deaths in Ireland are related to sepsis. That is an average of eight deaths every day in Ireland, and that is only what is recorded as death from sepsis. Medical professionals say that sepsis is rare, but it is not so rare and is quite common. Sepsis does not discriminate. Anyone can get an infection and any infection can lead to sepsis. Each year in Ireland, sepsis is responsible for a shocking 60% of hospital deaths, therefore, this life-threatening health condition is one that should not be overlooked.

Sepsis, sometimes referred to as blood poisoning, happens when an infection in the body triggers the immune system to turn against itself to harm the body’s tissues and even cause organ failure. The reason this happens is that a localised infection in the body has spread toxic substances into the bloodstream. The immune system tries to fight the spread but instead becomes overactive and causes widespread inflammation. This results in septic shock causing a severe drop in blood levels leading to oxygen not being able to reach tissues and organs. Bacterial infections are the most common cause of sepsis, usually starting in the lungs from a cut or wound in the gastrointestinal and urinary tract. Other than infection prevention, the best way to help protect yourself if you get sepsis is by knowing the warning signs. Studies show that 80% of deaths relating to sepsis could be avoided with early treatment and diagnosis. Administered early enough, straightforward treatment with intravenous antibiotics and fluids can halt the progress of sepsis and allow patients to make a full recovery.

Sepsis is the number one cause of preventable death and disabilities worldwide. Sepsis is a time-critical condition. If a person has sepsis, then preventing delay in diagnosis and treatment is key.

If sepsis is not treated immediately, it can result in organ failure and death. Yet with early diagnosis, sepsis can be treated with antibiotics. Sepsis deaths are preventable deaths.

I thank the witnesses for sharing their stories. Seán and Rory sound like lovely kids. I thank Mr. Callaghan for telling us his story as well.

Before I start, I should record that I have an interest in this topic. I have had sepsis as well, and, as Mr. Callaghan said, I am one of the lucky ones. We are also joined this morning by the Chair of the Joint Committee on Public Petitions and the Ombudsmen, Deputy Martin Browne, as well as some of its members, including Deputies Mairéad Farrell, O'Dowd and Deputy Conway-Walsh. They are all very welcome.

As we have about an hour left, I am going to go straight to business. Each member will have five minutes. I call Senator Martin Conway.

Deputy Colm Burke is in a hurry, so I have agreed to let him contribute ahead of me.

Okay. I call Deputy Colm Burke.

I thank the Cathaoirleach. I thank the witnesses for taking time out of their own schedules to be here with us here. I also thank them for the time they have given over recent years to dealing with this issue. Recently, I had to deal with a grandparent whose eight-year-old grandson died from sepsis. Unfortunately, he probably did not get to hospital on time. It was just one of those issues, because time is of the essence in dealing with sepsis.

I wish to talk about the protocols available and in place in the United States. Have the protocols in place in American hospitals been communicated to the HSE? Has a structure been established to have these protocols transferred to the HSE and its system?

Ms Orlaith Staunton

We have not made them available. They have been spoken about at all global sepsis events, though, so I imagine, therefore, that the HSE has them available but I do not know.

Is the structure of protocols in the US in place in hospitals throughout the country or is it only in certain states?

Ms Orlaith Staunton

It started out in New York, and five or six states have now also put them in place. Our big push was to get them adopted federally. Just three months ago, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, CDC, introduced codes of care, which are practically the same as Rory's regulations.

The evidence is that as a result of these protocols, there has been a substantial decrease in deaths as a result of sepsis.

Ms Orlaith Staunton

Yes.

Mr. Ciarán Staunton

There have been 20,000 deaths in four years.

This has been a reduction of 45% to 50%.

Mr. Ciarán Staunton

I do not know what the percentage is but I know-----

It is a substantial reduction anyway.

Mr. Ciarán Staunton

We have met the families of the loved ones. I have the percentage figure the Deputy asked for now. It is 8%.

Just on the time period, in the context of the case I had to deal with recently, there was a very short timeframe between the person becoming ill and being transferred to hospital. I presume the timeframe involved varies from case to case.

Ms Orlaith Staunton

I am not a medical professional but it does obviously vary from case to case, depending on how fast the infection is passing through one's body and how fast the toxins are moving. In our case, by the time Rory got antibiotics, they did act to kill the infection, but the toxins had gone ahead by then. This meant there was no coming back and he was going to die. This is generally what happens. Patients go into septic shock, and it is very hard to come back again.

As the Deputy said about the eight-year-old, it almost becomes the responsibility of the parent to identify that it is sepsis and to argue with the doctors that this is what it could be. We want to stop this happening. We want to reach a situation where, when we know our children are sick and we get them to a doctor or a hospital, the doctors and other medical professionals are waiting there, querying whether the symptoms could be caused by sepsis, and, if it is the case, they will know what to do. This is what is in place in New York.

One of the problems, however, with parents, or with all of us, is that there is not a great deal of information available on the symptoms of sepsis.

Ms Orlaith Staunton

That is right.

The witnesses, therefore, are looking for a major campaign to highlight the things we need to watch out for in this context. Sepsis could start off with a very small cut, as I understand it, and then, as a result, an infection occurs and spreads very fast.

Mr. Ciarán Staunton

Also, if I may say so, the onus should not be left on the families.

Mr. Ciarán Staunton

We are not medical professionals. If we have a pain in our chests, for example, we go to the medical institution and the professionals there know what they are looking for. It is the same in the case of a stroke or something else. The onus should not be on parents to bury their children and then educate the public.

Absolutely. That is important. Even if we were to have the basic information disseminated, that would be a good thing.

Mr. Ciarán Staunton

I agree.

From the HSE's recent presentation, I note that information leaflets were distributed to all GPs. To put a question to all the family members here, do they think there is enough information available within the general practices, and even with hospital doctors, to allow for the identification of the symptoms to watch out for in dealing with sepsis?

Mr. Joseph Hughes

Unfortunately, there is not enough information out there. We have been in touch with the HSE in respect of the sepsis programme. We were told the new leaflets were distributed to all the GP offices and pharmacies, because the Irish Pharmacy Union of Ireland was involved. This is not the case.

Mr. Hughes is saying that-----

Mr. Joseph Hughes

Individual GP surgeries have to follow a link and order the leaflets.

Mr. Hughes is saying the leaflets-----

Mr. Joseph Hughes

It is down to the receptionist of the surgery as regards what leaflets are displayed. It should not be this way.

Okay. I thank everybody for their very valuable contributions.

I call Deputy Cullinane.

Sometimes evidence we hear presented before this committee stops us in our tracks and I think this is one of those days. I thank Ms Phoenix, Mr. Hughes, Ms Staunton, Mr. Staunton, Ms O'Mahony and Mr. Callaghan for their evidence today. It is important. As Mr. Staunton said, it should not be left to the families to do all the heavy lifting in terms of advocacy work and trying to seek improvements in this regard. There is much we can do, so it is extremely important the witnesses are here with us and that we are having this session. This committee needs to take on this issue as one of our top priorities in respect of seeking improvements in this regard. We will have witnesses from the HSE in with us next and that will be the first step in this process.

Equally, there was a conference a few weeks ago at which my office was represented. I took some notes regarding what feedback emerged from that conference. Included were comments suggesting that the sepsis programme in this State needs a publicly-funded research nurse in every hospital. This would not cost a great deal of money and it should be done. It was also observed that mandatory national guidelines exist but that there are questions around their implementation. We need to follow up with the HSE on this matter and seek a report from it on this matter. The feedback at that conference also included the fact that the national sepsis team audits hospitals for compliance but the guidelines in this regard are themselves inadequate. There is room for improvement in terms of basic research and diagnostics and updating against international guidelines. I think that we need to take the protocols in place in New York and those other states and examine how improvements in that context have come about, what they have done and how we can learn from them in respect of updating our own programmes and guidelines in this State. There is also a need for greater awareness among medical professionals, including, as the witnesses said, dentists, GPs, pharmacists and so on.

There is, then, a great deal that can be done. I will give the remainder of my time to the witnesses to comment, perhaps starting with Ms O'Mahony and moving on to Mr. Staunton, Ms Staunton and Ms Phoenix. I would like them to give us a sense of what they would say if they were talking to the HSE's representatives. What is the one thing they would ask them? What are the main priorities they would want to see being adopted by HSE in the very short term?

Ms Doireann O'Mahony

I thank Deputy Cullinane. We believe there should be a national sepsis strategy focused on prevention, detection and treatment. I got a taxi across town to be here. I told the taxi driver what I was coming to and asked him if he knew about sepsis. He said he had heard of it and that "It's deadly, isn't it?" and "It's pretty lethal". I then asked him if he was aware of the signs and symptoms of sepsis, and he said, "No". This is what we as a charity have consistently observed. I refer to families burying loved ones, just like this, and saying they had never even heard of sepsis until the post-mortem report came back or the doctors mentioned the word "sepsis".

The reality is that sepsis kills as many people in this country as heart attacks, strokes and some of the most common cancers. Yet very few people understand what sepsis is. We need to change this. We need to focus on, at the fundamental level, ensuring there is public awareness of the signs and symptoms.

As has been mentioned by Deputy Burke, time is of the essence. My understanding is that for every hour treatment is delayed, there is an 8% increase in the likelihood that the patient will die. That is why it is so vitally important we do that. I think the Irish Sepsis Foundation members would support me in my call upon the Government and the HSE to develop a national sepsis strategy, to show tangible evidence that they are committed to preventing avoidable deaths from sepsis.

Mr. Ciarán Staunton

We worked with the national sepsis group within the HSE. We have spoken at a number of its events and it has reached out, as have people like Professor Fidelma Fitzpatrick, Ronán Ó Cathasaigh and others. They have worked very hard with what they have got. That is the bigger problem - what have they got? We do not know. If I may go back to Deputy Burke's question, New York state has co-operated with any state or any country that calls to say it wants to know more about sepsis protocols. It is willing to talk to them. It is willing to go through it and walk them through right, left and centre. Someone else has put it together.

Mr. Joseph Hughes

We have had a couple of meetings with the national sepsis programme. One of the main things we took away from those meetings was that we asked how many full-time people work on the national sepsis programme and we were told there is nobody full-time. It goes back to accountability and responsibility. They say their hands are tied because they only have so much, they have other jobs they do, they do this and they do that. I will say again what I said earlier. The public are being denied and deprived of a national sepsis awareness programme where they bring in protocols, tied together in a package the way it is done in other countries. Do we not deserve the same?

The witnesses are very welcome. I thank them for sharing their stories with us. We can only start to appreciate the tragedy involved in the loss of a child but when it is a preventable death, it must be absolutely overwhelming. I thank the witnesses for the work they have done. Not only are they dealing with their own grief but the fact that they are campaigning to stop this happening to other families is very commendable. I thank them for what they are doing and for raising their voices about that. I recall being at the memorial service for Sean in the local park. Clearly the family were devastated at that stage but I also recall the impact Lil Red's death had on a huge number of local young people. It was one of the most emotional events I was at. You could see how it touched so many lives. It was just so shocking that lives were being lost where the death could be preventable.

As I say, I thank the witnesses for the work they are doing. I just want to check in with them on the changes that were made in New York. What were the top three? Mr. Staunton mentioned the protocol. To what extent was that protocol, awareness of sepsis and the speed with which it moves ingrained into the training of doctors and nurses in New York? We want to learn from the success they have had there.

Ms Orlaith Staunton

At the outset, it came about through a group that was partly patient advocates, New York state and the hospital associations. Everybody had a voice. The state health commissioner said at the time that the Staunton family lost 25% of their family but that they were going to stop that and it was not going to happen again. The call came from him. The group asked how they could ensure that did not happen again and what the most important thing was. The most important thing was having established standards of care for when somebody shows up at an emergency room. Over 87% of people who get sepsis come through the emergency room in the hospital. At that time people thought it might be from IV lines or whatever. That is some of it but most people come through the emergency room. The most important thing was to identify and treat sepsis, and treat it rapidly. That was essentially what they needed to do. Because every hospital is different, they asked each hospital about it. They had a gold standard and asked the hospitals to submit the standards they thought would work for them. They did and then the state approved them. Of course, they also had to report on how their sepsis numbers were.

I am sorry, I forgot the second part of the Deputy's question. Was it about how they ensure they are trained?

Ms Orlaith Staunton

If a person wants to renew their licence in New York in any area of healthcare, they must do a sepsis training course. It is a must. It is not a case of it being good if they would do it. It is a must in order to renew a licence. That is how it is done.

What about the original training for healthcare professionals? Is there an element relating to sepsis in the training?

Ms Orlaith Staunton

Until Rory died there was not. Now there is.

There is now a programme there. I am curious to know about the witnesses' engagement with HSE. The fact there is not a single person overseeing this means there is no clear focus. That is certainly something we will take up.

Mr. Joseph Hughes

It seems the role is always changing person. We will only be getting to know a person and getting their contact details and they will have moved. Then it is somebody else all over again.

We are very familiar with that problem.

Mr. Joseph Hughes

That is all I am saying. There is no continuity there.

Who have the witnesses been meeting with there? Is it somebody at a sufficiently senior level?

Mr. Joseph Hughes

Yes, we were there with Lorna - I do not remember her name - and Dr. Michael O'Dwyer

Ms Karen Phoenix

We met with Dr. Colm Henry as well.

Mr. Joseph Hughes

Our last meeting was with Dr. Henry.

That is very senior. To go back to the Stauntons, has the template that was put in place in New York been shared with HSE? Has there been that kind of communication?

Mr. Ciarán Staunton

We do not know what communication happens between the HSE and New York state.

Ms Karen Phoenix

We spoke to Dr. Colm Henry that day about what the procedure is when someone is suspected of having sepsis in an accident and emergency department or hospital setting. He said there is a protocol called Sepsis Six protocols. It is something like Rory's Regulations. Th HSE said it is working fine. We take its word on it that it is working fine but there are still 60% of people dying of sepsis in hospitals.

I thank all our guests for being here. I know it costs them personally every time they have to tell their story and advocate. I have three questions and we are short on time so I might just ask the three questions and then hand over to the witnesses. Deputy Shortall mentioned the training of doctors. I know that in other jurisdictions, such as the UK and France for example, there is training for pharmacists. When you have small children or healthy children you are more likely to run down to the pharmacy to get stuff for a child you think is fluey. Do the witnesses have any thoughts on that?

Second, today we have talked a lot about children who were very healthy but I know that sepsis often affects people who have underlying conditions. It strikes me, particularly in the US situation, that an overlapping issue here in that a lot of people with chronic illness utilise private services. I am thinking in particular of the hospital at home service. The person I was talking to recently about sepsis had a bad experience with that service and his sepsis was missed for an extended period of time. Is there a concern around how we can reach out to the HSE, and beyond that because we have a two-tier system? How do we reach out to those people with chronic illness who have a tendency to assign issues to their underlying condition?

On the third issue, maybe Mr. Callaghan could speak to this. I know the road back from sepsis is very long. For the person I was talking to it was a two-year process and they are only just back to work now. They needed occupational therapy and counselling.

Could our guests speak to that? Certainly, I would expect that any strategy would not just be about the early stages and identification but would also include that very long road back afterwards.

We will start with Mr. Callaghan and work backwards.

Mr. Conor Callaghan

I had it in March. I was in hospital for 12 weeks and I got out around the start of June. I am still struggling mentally to this day. I still cannot believe it happened. I was so fit that I had been training for a marathon just before it happened and I had no underlying conditions. I went into the accident and emergency department on that day and I asked them if it could be sepsis. They turned around and told me that I was too fit and well aware, so probably not. They said I would be okay and that I would be at home that night and on antibiotics. I had a seizure that night and things went rapidly downhill from there. The aftermath of it was probably worse than my time in hospital. I am still struggling day to day. I am only back to work full-time this week. It has been a mental battle more than a physical battle, even though I have had open-heart surgery twice. That was probably one of the easier parts of the past seven months that I have gone through.

Ms Doireann O'Mahony

If I can come in on that as well, what Deputy Hourigan has said about the long road back is very important, as is hearing from people like Mr. Callaghan. That is the reality. There is a huge personal human cost associated with a delayed diagnosis of sepsis when people die. This is also the case, however, when people get sepsis and they survive. The road back can be torturous.

There also is a huge associated cost to the State in the long term. For every patient who goes into intensive care with sepsis, according to the HSE's latest report the average length of stay is approximately three weeks. ICU beds are at a premium and it costs a lot of money to the State to keep people in them. If people come out of ICU, the picture is bleak. Many of them have post-sepsis syndrome, they have post-traumatic stress, it affects them mentally, they cannot get back to work or they cannot participate at the level to which they did before. They may have had amputations of digits or limbs. They may need therapies, adaptations to their homes or care in the home. Is the HSE looking at the cost of all of that to the State? We have to take a broader view. We cannot be short-sighted about this. I understand that every year, there is a budget and there are constraints but we have to consider the enormous cost and burden this is having on the State for people who actually survive sepsis. This is not just on a personal level, but on a financial level too.

Ms Orlaith Staunton

I will jump in to answer the Deputy's question on community care. It is crucial that sepsis is considered a community problem. We work very closely with the Home Care Association of New York State. We run several webinars with them. They are completely clued into training the people who are going into the homes. They have a list they have to follow when they go in to meet people. We also train others and under the Rory Staunton law, every medical person, pharmacist, dental assistant - you name it - has to do the sepsis training and that makes a big difference.

Mr. Joseph Hughes

We are very lucky that there are two local homecare companies that have taken this on board themselves and have included sepsis awareness training for their existing and new staff. They are the first port of call for much of our older population in terms of minding them and looking after them.

Sepsis deaths are preventable and sepsis is the number one cause of preventable deaths and disabilities worldwide. It all starts with awareness. That is the top of the pyramid and it all rolls down after that. The HSE is saying that the sepsis 6 bundle is working and that it has all the bells and whistles but obviously it is not. Maybe they could look at Rory's regulations and collaborate there.

Ms Karen Phoenix

One thing we said when we met the HSE and Colm Henry was that while Mr. Hughes and I are not medical professionals, a bit of common sense is needed. Would they not rule it out when someone admits themselves to hospital? Rule it out. Start at the worst-case scenario. That would save an awful lot of lives.

Mr. Joseph Hughes

We say they should just ask others who have had sepsis. Also, they should definitely rule it out with the medical professionals.

I thank everyone for sharing their stories at the committee today. As Deputy Cullinane said, this health committee has been going on for the last three-and-a-half years but it is extremely powerful to hear personal testimonies and stories. It is very helpful in relation to understanding sepsis.

I have a number of questions, which have probably been raised before. Is there a medical facility or a specialist in Ireland that has expertise on sepsis? Is there a set of specialists who have knowledge of this subject matter and who are the people to go in the State?

Mr. Joseph Hughes

I do not think so.

Right. Mr. Hughes mentioned a very important word. He said that there are certain circumstances where many of these could be "preventable". What could the HSE put in place so that people could be prevented from dying in certain circumstances?

Mr. Joseph Hughes

It all begins with awareness. That begins at home with the parents or the guardians. Awareness begins at home. It is also a matter of awareness among the healthcare professionals. They should be trained or retrained on sepsis awareness.

Is it the case that Mr. Hughes does not feel that the medical fraternity is knowledgeable about this?

Mr. Joseph Hughes

Obviously not, because preventable deaths are still happening every day in Ireland.

Turning to Mr. Callaghan, how has he found the circumstances of his rehabilitation?

Mr. Conor Callaghan

There has obviously been a huge change in my life since March. I was playing senior football and had been training for marathons. Everything seemed to be going well until I got struck with sepsis. It is a matter of the mental, more than physical side of things, as I said.

How is Mr. Callaghan doing physically at the moment?

Mr. Conor Callaghan

I am physically okay.

Is he back doing physical activities?

Mr. Conor Callaghan

Yes, I am back playing football. Luckily, it could have gone a lot worse but this is a matter of the mental battle. Getting up every morning and everything is ten times harder. I was always very outgoing and happy, and it has taken its toll. Even the 12 weeks in hospital, where I had nobody to talk to about the whole situation, was tough.

It is obviously very important to get through that.

My final question is about intervention. Obviously, intervention is key in relation to sepsis and the sooner the better. Yet, what are we talking about? When somebody presents themselves in an accident and emergency department, what kind of timeframe are we talking about to prevent somebody from going into an almost irreversible state?

Mr. Joseph Hughes

That depends on the infection. In the most severe cases, somebody could die from sepsis within 12 hours.

Does the age of the person make any difference?

Mr. Joseph Hughes

Sepsis does not discriminate on the basis of age, gender, race or wealth. It could happen to a man or woman. Sepsis does not discriminate.

Ms Doireann O'Mahony

At the extremes, patients who are over 65 years of age or under one year of age are probably more susceptible because they have weaker immune systems. Yet, as we have all seen and heard this morning, and as Mr. Hughes has said, it does not discriminate.

I will say one thing to Deputy Gino Kenny about that. He has just heard Mr. Callaghan mention how alone he felt. It is really important that the message goes back that we need support services for people like him, because they have nowhere to turn. We hear all the time about cancer services and stroke services but we do not ever hear about sepsis services in Ireland. People like Mr. Callaghan want to feel a sense of connection, community, that their story matters and that their voice will be heard. It is therefore vitally important that sepsis services are established.

What would that look like?

Ms Doireann O'Mahony

That would look like what it looks like for other conditions, such as cancer and stroke.

At a very basic level for somebody like Mr. Callaghan, it would perhaps be a sepsis nurse checking in with him on a weekly basis after his discharge from hospital.

That is obviously needed. Is there such a thing as a sepsis nurse?

Mr. Conor Callaghan

I have not been given any information on anything since I got discharged. That was it.

I am conscious of the time. Deputy Durkan is next.

Deputy Bernard J. Durkan

I welcome the witnesses this morning for what is a watershed meeting. They have brought to the attention of the committee something that is highly important and has troubled many of us for a long time. Like the Chairman, I had experience in hospital not related to sepsis but related to other matters in recent times. I was appalled at some of the things I saw. The speed of identification of sepsis is the crucial and critical factor. A patient could be sitting in a waiting area for half a day and things could be getting progressively worse and we need to get ahead of that. My first interaction with the condition was in respect of pregnancies during the debate about repealing the eighth amendment to the Constitution. There can be fluctuation of blood pressure in the latter stages of a pregnancy and it can become very serious. The action taken by the medics is of huge importance at that stage.

The witnesses have confirmed everything that I have said before and, incidentally, have been contradicted before. I am sure they have been contradicted also well. During the debate to repeal the eighth amendment to the Constitution, I asked a medic how prevalent sepsis was. He said it was very rare in Ireland nowadays. I remember the exchange. I asked how many cases had happened in the previous 12 months and he stated it was three or four. I suggested that they must all have come to me at that stage and I doubted that. There was this pre-established notion that it was not a serious issue here for some reason and that it was not important; it is important. The diagnosis is very important. In half an hour, it can become a life and death issue and go past the point of no return. That is the thing we need to remember about it.

Accident and emergency departments in hospitals need to be alert to it. For example, a person going to an accident and emergency department may face a waiting period of two or three hours. That is not on; that does not work. That is the crucial time. If it is not arrested in the first three or four hours, it is too late. It is tragic for the families of people who have been affected. It would have been so easy to resolve the problem if the right intervention had been taken at the right time. We need to highlight this for professionals in accident and emergency departments and GPs as well.

In the cases dealt with, the GPs did their job and made a referral straight away. What should happen then is early testing, as that should show it up instantly. I do not know why that does not happen. In some cases, people can be waiting to be triaged in our accident and emergency departments for four or five hours. However, the full triage needs to be done as simply testing blood pressure and so on is not sufficient; it has to be blood tests and so on. The full range of events that need to take place must take place quickly to identify, isolate and come to a conclusion. It is very simple to treat, provided it is identified in time.

I again thank the witnesses for being here. They have confirmed all the things I have personally had to deal with in the past on behalf of constituents. In many cases, suddenly a person just dies and family and friends say nobody knew what the condition was. It is only through those who are persistent and follow it up that it suddenly gets recognition. The witnesses are to be congratulated on what they have done. I offer commiserations on the tragic circumstances in which they have had to do it. That should not happen at all. As far as I and the committee are concerned, the lesson to be learned is for quick action. The issue needs to be identified quickly and dealt with after which it is simple. It is like a circle. At a certain point when it reaches the zenith of that circle, it is too late - it is gone and all over.

I will move on to Senator Black, who I ask to confirm that she is on the campus.

Yes, I am on the campus.

I thank all the witnesses for coming in today and telling their story. I am so sorry. I am a mother and a grandmother. I cannot even imagine what it has been like for them to go through what they have gone through, knowing that this could have been in some way stopped. That is the most difficult piece of it. Their beautiful children could have been here today if that awareness had been out there. Mr. Callaghan is going through a difficult time and I commend him on the work he is doing. I commend everybody on the phenomenal work they are doing. I hope that as a result of today's meeting something will definitely shift.

I believe Ms O'Mahony mentioned the importance of a public awareness campaign, which is absolutely vital now. There must be a public awareness campaign for sepsis. Why is it not treated as being that important? What is the thinking on that? Why is sepsis not highlighted? Why is there not as much awareness of sepsis as there is of cancer, heart disease and stroke? What is the block there? I am flummoxed on that.

Deputy Hourigan earlier mentioned pharmacies. What is the thinking on that? If somebody was aware that it could be sepsis, would it be an idea for them to go to their local pharmacy and discuss with the pharmacist what is going on? Perhaps the pharmacy could prevent this happening.

Is it hard to diagnose patients who may experience symptoms but already have existing conditions or illnesses? In the work the witnesses have done, have they ever experienced somebody who has symptoms of sepsis but they already have existing conditions or illnesses? Those are my questions. I hope I am not complicating things by asking those questions.

Mr. Ciarán Staunton

It is difficult to say why but let me provide some stark figures. Over 11 million people in the world die each year from sepsis. Fewer than 10 million die from cancer. Most people would say that cancer is the largest killer but sepsis is the largest killer of children in the world. Putting all that together, one might ask why there is not a national medical emergency for sepsis here. The HSE figures show it is almost 3,000 and rising. When Dr. Healy and I went to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, CDC, in Washington, there was not one piece of paper with sepsis on it. After Rory died, when we looked at the website under the letter S, there was nothing for sepsis. When we set up the international sepsis alliance, we were taking the lead on this. The chair and committee members are saying today is that not enough has been done but the buck stops now. I think out of here it will go.

As I said, one week I was in the pizza shop with my fine son being asked what kind of pizza we wanted. The following week I was in a funeral home and was being asked what kind of coffin we wanted.

That is the reality we need to bring back. People need to say that this is a national emergency happening to our children and parents. I think that is what needs to come out of here to move forward.

Would anyone like to respond to the question on pharmacies?

Mr. Joseph Hughes

This relates to training being provided so that antibiotics can be administered to somebody who presents at a pharmacy. The excuse from the HSE was that this has to be done in a hospital setting. It is a broad spectrum of antibiotics, oxygen and fluids. It is easily treated, but I think it currently has to be done in a hospital setting. It is almost six years since we lost our son and started our campaign. For those six years, we were the only sepsis awareness campaign in Ireland. Why should it be left to grieving parents? Some days it is a struggle to get out of bed and face the world. We do what we do for our son's memory, and in honour of everybody who had sepsis and survived it and those who lost someone. Why is it left to us? Let the people with the public relations companies, big staff and budgets and deep pockets behind them get it done. Six years down the line and we are still doing this. Hopefully, please God, something will come out of today.

I again thank the witnesses for the work they are doing. It is phenomenal. I hope something shifts in this country. I also thank them for the many lives they are saving through the work they are doing. I am deeply grateful.

I thank all of our witnesses. Deputy Cullinane said there are rare times in this committee when we are taken aback and shocked by what we hear. Deputy Durkan said it too. Today is one of those days. I have known Mr. Staunton a long time. He has campaigned on many issues over the 20 years I have known him. However, this is clearly the most important he has ever been involved in. He has already saved lives. That is a tribute to the memory of his son, who should never have lost his life. There are a lot of issues, difficulties and challenges in this country. We can deal with them if we want to. In 2005 or 2006, we developed a national cancer strategy, which has been phenomenally successful. The survival rates from cancer in this country are now enormous compared with what they were. Sepsis needs the same approach. There needs to be an awareness campaign. The protocols in place in New York need to be in every hospital in this country. It needs to happen quickly. This should not be incremental over a number of years. This is what the committee can do.

The HSE is coming in after this group but we can follow up by bringing in the Minister. We can do a report and use every avenue we have to support what needs to be done. Of course, the witnesses should not have to do that but, unfortunately, people's stories are sometimes the catalyst lighting the match to create the change.

I campaign a lot on sight loss. Some 80% of sight loss in this country is also preventable. However, from what I have heard today, 100% of sepsis deaths are preventable. Let us deal with this issue head on and, once and for all, have the necessary supports, campaigns, protocols and interventions when they are needed and in a timely fashion.

Have the witnesses formally met the Minister for Health?

Ms Karen Phoenix

Yes, we have.

They would like to think the issue is on his agenda.

Ms Karen Phoenix

Yes.

That is great. A number of non-members have indicated that they wish to contribute.

I particularly wanted to be here because of Ms and Mr. Staunton. I think it was in 2011 that I met Rory in Westport, County Mayo. I can relate to everything Mr. Staunton says. I thank everybody for sharing their stories today. I think this is a game-changer in terms of how we approach this. Mr. and Ms Staunton said they had never heard of sepsis. We cannot now say that as legislators.

Many of my questions have already been asked. My main question was why this happens when we can see the figures for heart attacks and strokes and so on. Senator Black asked that question.

The UK National Health Service, NHS, has care bundles and sepsis pathways. I even see some of the community and nursing stuff it is doing in places like Gloucester. It seems to be ahead. Is there a possibility for us to have an all-island approach in the same way as we have an all-island strategy with the cancer research institute?

Mr. Joseph Hughes

There is a possibility and a need, but the want has to be there. The HSE needs to want to do it. There is possibility and need.

I am thinking of something that need not completely come under the shared island initiative. There could be contributions from both sides for an all-island institute. We can look at this, so everybody across the island, not just every child, would have the same treatment and there would be a consistency of messaging.

Mr. Ciarán Staunton

I thank the Deputy for her welcome and all she has done. Rory met her in Westport, Ballycroy and a few different places. Her cousin Jimmy Campbell was good to him in New York. The all-Ireland or all-island situation is that anything is better than what we have. I have spoken to people from Daisy Hill Hospital. I have spoken at the conferences I named. Any place is better than buying coffins, losing limbs and losing loved ones. It can only improve from here onwards as far as I am concerned because "No" means coffins. The UK Sepsis Trust has an active and well-organised group. I do not know what it is up to but people are dying across the island of Ireland of sepsis and they are preventable deaths. If an area in that unit can be stepped up, I would welcome it.

Ms Doireann O'Mahony

It has been said, but I will repeat, that it should not be left to the likes of Mr. Hughes and Ms Phoenix or Mr. and Ms Staunton to constantly and tirelessly campaign for this. We must also bear in mind that the HSE published a national clinical guideline on the management of sepsis only after the death Savita Halappanavar, which made headlines worldwide for all of the wrong reasons. It is important we have these guidelines, and they are updated and so on. However, it should not be a postcode lottery either. Those guidelines should not be shelved. They need to be disseminated and implemented. Doctors and nurses need to be constantly retrained on them. They are only as effective as they can be if properly utilised. I endorse that all-Ireland approach of looking again at the clinical guideline but making sure it is in place throughout the country, so it should not matter if your child is sick in Letterkenny, County Donegal, Kerry or Dublin city centre. They will get the right treatment with the right implementation of that guideline.

On a scale of one to ten, where are we in terms of sepsis awareness?

Mr. Joseph Hughes

We are at one, two or three. We are rock bottom. The only way is up.

To go back to what Deputy Durkan said, it is all about the golden hour when people present with sepsis. People may as well go to the milkman as the doctor. Nowadays the milkman has a better possibility of knowing what sepsis is. What is there is non-existent. The tree needs to be shaken. In 2019, we met the then Minister for Health, Deputy Simon Harris, who said that €1 million would be put aside for sepsis awareness. Nothing ever happened. The Minister moved jobs. There is no continuity.

I call Deputy Browne who is Cathaoirleach of the Oireachtas Joint Committee on Public Petitions and the Ombudsmen.

I thank the Cathaoirleach for allowing me to participate. I welcome the witnesses. Our committee has met them on several occasions. The first thing that jumped out at us was the figure that 11 million people a year worldwide die from something that is preventable. We thought after speaking to Mr. Staunton that we might get legislation similar to that in New York. We have asked the Oireachtas Library and Research Service to examine it to see whether the same type of system can work here. We are waiting for it to come back to us. I ask this committee to get on board so that, together, we can work on a cross-party paper. Deputy O'Dowd has been with us on this. We should all push to have a system such as that which the families are requesting.

Communication is a simple issue. It has been raised at our committee and again here today. September is set aside as sepsis month. This is crazy when we hear the figures involved. There should be communication every day of the week, 12 months a year. Ms O'Mahony said that sepsis kills more people every year than five types of cancers combined. No one would give out about the money spent on cancer campaigns, road safety campaigns or any other campaign that saves people's lives. As Mr. Staunton said, these are not figures; they are lives. Oireachtas committees and politicians need to get serious and insist that such a campaign is run 12 months a year across the board so that the Stauntons, Mr. Hughes, Ms Phoenix and the Irish Sepsis Foundation do not need to come before our committees to beg for help to get word out there.

When we get something back from the Oireachtas Library and Research Service on how we can move forward, I ask that this committee come on board in order that, between the two committees, we can try to get something done. I am not looking for an answer on this today; it is something the committee can discuss afterwards. This needs to be fought on a bigger scale, so that families are not the people who need to push the issue. It is we as legislators who need to push it from now on. I thank the Cathaoirleach for allowing me to speak and I thank the witnesses.

I thank Deputy Browne for attending the meeting.

I thank the Cathaoirleach for the invitation to speak. It is very important that this hearing is being held. I am here in a personal capacity, different from everybody else here, in that my sister is the mother of Rory and of Kathleen. I pay tribute to Ciarán and Orlaith, and to Kathleen who is here behind me in the Gallery. Rory was her brother and her closest friend. He was her wonderful, amazing friend. Ciarán and I have different politics but Rory was very alert at 12 years of age and many a debate we had about Irish politics and where Ireland was going and where America was going. We agreed on people such as Bill Clinton.

Rory was an amazing person who brought light to his peers. He stood up and fought in his school for children who had disabilities. He insisted on equality and fairness in his life. I know that Kathleen, his sister, also has these qualities. Kathleen was speaking to my grandchildren last week telling them about Rory. They wanted to know where Rory is now. We know he is here, as are all of the people who have passed due to sepsis. They are all here because we have accountability and responsibility for them.

This is my role here today. I am not a member of the committee but my voice is loud and clear on this issue. I support fully the actions to be taken by the committee and the Joint Committee on Public Petitions and the Ombudsmen to ensure that all of the political parties in the coming election sign up to a programme, if we can put one together. If we all agree it, we can make it happen.

Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital in Drogheda, when it became aware of Rory's passing, met me and others. Every year, it runs a sepsis awareness campaign. Initially it was for a week. Everywhere in the hospital there are murals and paintings and there are people to advise on what sepsis is to make every person who visits the hospital aware of the evil that it is.

I will quote Senator Chuck Schumer, who is still the majority leader in the US Senate. He told Ciarán and Orlaith that rather than curse the darkness, they lit the light. Rather than curse the darkness, Karen, Joe and the Irish Sepsis Foundation are lighting the light. It is our job to make sure this flame shines brightly and clearly and dispels all of the myths and untruths so that people get the treatment they need. I very much honour all of the witnesses. The HSE will come before the committee later and we will ask it to explain its ways. It has been a privilege to hear the witnesses and I support them fully.

That is a lovely way to end this part of the meeting. Let us not curse the darkness. I thank the witnesses for coming before the committee and sharing their stories. As I said at the beginning of the meeting, I have a personal involvement and I have been on the journey. I had a near-death experience and people are never the same afterwards. I did not realise that for every hour of having sepsis, there is an 8% chance of dying. I was in the hospital for days. I went home after an operation and my body had started to close down. My face was roasting. My feet, hands and everything were going cold. I went to the emergency department and I was told I looked very healthy and there did not appear to be anything wrong with me. Then there were bells and whistles and I woke up on the ward. People asked me different questions such as whether I had been abroad. I had recently been in Tanzania with an Oireachtas committee. I was told that perhaps it was malaria. They did tests for that and all sorts of other tests. All the time, I was dying. I remember being awake one night and I knew I was dying. You just have to dig deep. As Mr. Callaghan said, you are never the same. I hope, as people are expressing their views here today, that we can move this on. Collectively, we all feel that we could do more on it. This will put big pressure on the next group coming before the committee, and rightly so. Perhaps we can attach a bit more urgency to the issue.

We are talking about a campaign in the second quarter of 2024. If we can bring that back a bit, we can possibly save some of the lives we are talking about here today. I thank the witnesses for their involvement this morning. It was really powerful. I appreciate they had to come in and relive the difficulties they have been through as families and individuals. There are probably many more people out there listening today. Today is not only about getting action. It is also about giving information to people out there. That is useful as well. I thank everyone very much. I will suspend the meeting until the next group comes in.

Sitting suspended at 11 a.m. and resumed at 11.11 a.m.

The committee will now resume its consideration of sepsis awareness, prevention and associated services. I am pleased to welcome from the HSE Dr. Colm Henry, chief clinical officer, Dr. Orla Healy, national clinical director for quality and patient safety, Dr. Michael O'Dwyer, national clinical lead for the sepsis programme, and Dr. Ciara Martin, national clinical adviser and group lead for children and young people.

I will read a note on privilege. Witnesses are reminded of the long-standing parliamentary practice that they should not criticise or make charges against a person or entity by name or in such a way as to make him or her identifiable or otherwise engage in speech that might be regarded as damaging to the good name of the person or entity. Therefore, if their statements are potentially defamatory in relation to an identifiable person or entity, they will be directed to discontinue their remarks. It is imperative that they comply with any such direction.

Members are also reminded of the long-standing parliamentary practice to the effect that they should not comment on, criticise or make charges against a person outside the Houses or an official either by name or in such a way as to make him or her identifiable.

I invite Dr. Henry to make his opening statement on behalf of the HSE.

Dr. Colm Henry

I wish the Chair and members of the committee a good morning. I thank them for their invitation to meet the Joint Committee on Health to discuss awareness, prevention and services for the treatment of sepsis. I thank and acknowledge the important contributions made not just this morning but by the Irish Sepsis Foundation, the End Sepsis campaign and Lil Red’s Legacy Sepsis Awareness Campaign, some of which we have had contact with in recent months. I commend the very impressive testimonies and stories from patients, which they were brave enough to share with us this morning. I am joined by my colleagues, Dr. Orla Healy, national clinical director for quality and patient safety, Dr. Michael O Dwyer, national clinical lead for the sepsis programme, and Dr. Ciara Martin, national clinical adviser and group lead for children and young people.

Today, I will present under the following headings around increasing awareness of signs and symptoms, prevention and appropriate management of sepsis through: implementation of national clinical guidelines; education and training of staff; audit, quality assurance and governance; increasing public awareness of sepsis; and the five-year strategic plan for the national clinical programme for sepsis, including its key priorities from 2024 to 2026.

The national clinical programme for sepsis, NSP, was established in 2014 and the first national clinical effectiveness committee national clinical guideline for sepsis was published. The focus of the programme is to promote the early recognition and evidence-based management of sepsis. Implementation of Sepsis Management for Adults (including maternity): National Clinical Guideline No. 26 is advanced through audit, education, quality improvement and raising awareness.

The national sepsis report for Ireland is published annually by the national clinical programme for sepsis. The report highlights the burden of sepsis in the acute settings and its associated mortality rates. The National Sepsis Report 2021 was published in March 2023. The key finding in that report was a 22.3% reduction in age-adjusted mortality from sepsis or septic shock since 2011 in Ireland. The overall reduction has been contributed to by development and implementation of the sepsis management for adults, including maternity, guideline of 2021 and implementing the national implementation plan for the International Guidelines for the Management of Septic Shock and Sepsis-Associated Organ Dysfunction in Children, which provides a standardised approach to the recognition and management of sepsis in Ireland. The increased knowledge and awareness and action of healthcare staff was the key driver behind these improvements in care.

Accurate reporting of sepsis epidemiology has been complicated since 2020 with the emergence of the Covid-19 pandemic. In addition, the mortality rates of patients with sepsis from SARS-CoV-2 were higher than in patients with sepsis from other causes, as we have outlined in our national report. Furthermore, as the pandemic has waned, there have been some poorly understood changes in sepsis epidemiology, including the global increase in invasive group A streptococcus infections, which we have also noted in Ireland. Notwithstanding these recent changes, mortality rates from sepsis have decreased since the inception of the programme in 2014 from 20.3% in 2020 to 19.0% in 2021, which are the published data available. It is expected those data will be published for 2022 before the year end.

Regarding education and training of staff, in 2015, a nationwide education campaign was commenced for relevant healthcare workers in acute hospitals as part of the implementation of the guideline, and in 2016, we noticed a 67% increase in documented cases of sepsis or septic shock.

E-learning modules are available on HSeLanD, the online learning and development platform, for all relevant staff on adult, maternity and paediatric sepsis. Regular education sessions on signs and symptoms of sepsis and the sepsis 6 bundle are conducted across all hospitals throughout the year with audits to assess adherence to recommendations. In June 2023, the programme conducted a qualitative survey on sepsis awareness and management in acute settings, which was completed anonymously by a large volume of clinical staff. The survey analysis and results indicate that there is a high uptake of the e-learning training module on HSeLanD.

The national clinical programme supported the establishment of a pilot project to introduce sepsis recognition and treatment for GPs. This project is progressing and is developing many resources for GPs across the country such as, for example, a quick reference guide for GPs on the recognition and treatment of sepsis in adults, which will be ready for implementation in quarter 2 of 2024. Other education and training opportunities have been provided to GPs, such as a recent webinar on recognising sepsis with more than 1,600 GP attendees. Other resources include supporting the integration of software to GP clinics to aid with sepsis awareness and management and education and awareness activities increase during Sepsis Awareness Month.

With regard to sharing expertise through events, the seventh sepsis summit took place in Dublin Castle on 19 September. This year’s summit had a global aspect with international experts and family advocates among those presenting. Some 500 health and social care professionals and almost 100 members of the public attended the event. The summit heard from a range of speakers on the latest scientific research and the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on sepsis care. Topics covered included improving early recognition of paediatric sepsis, the role of technology in sepsis diagnosis, the importance of antimicrobial stewardship and many more. The NSP invited public awareness champions and groups such as the Irish Sepsis Foundation and Lil Red’s Legacy Sepsis Awareness Campaign to the event and afforded them the opportunity to promote awareness at the event.

With regard to increasing public awareness of sepsis, a variety of resources were developed and widely distributed to all hospital groups, community healthcare organisations, CHOs, primary care and the GP network via the HSE and Children's Health Ireland, CHI. Communication links including animated paediatric videos and social media cuts and are currently being played in waiting rooms and public areas in all CHI hospitals and other clinical areas. These can be accessed via the link in the witness statement. Posters and credit cards with signs and symptoms of sepsis for both adults and children are widely distributed at sepsis awareness days and events and displayed locally in each hospital.

In 2023, a new sepsis information leaflet was developed, and I acknowledgment again the Lil Red's campaign, which was central to its development, to raise awareness of the signs and symptoms of sepsis in the community for adults, maternity and children and to provide advice on how to reduce the risk of developing sepsis. The leaflets were distributed to 1,700 GP surgeries and more than 1,800 community pharmacies and are translated into ten languages. Currently, all emergency ambulances carry signage on the signs and symptoms of sepsis and in the future, all National Ambulance Service, NAS, vehicles will carry this signage.

September was Sepsis Awareness Month, with World Sepsis Day recognised on 13 September. Many events and initiatives took place across our health service to mark World Sepsis Day. These included public awareness stands, staff education sessions, the provision of sepsis leaflets and the lighting up of public buildings. As part of our engagement with the media, we worked closely with patient advocates to highlight the symptoms of sepsis. All hospitals had information stands with pull-up banners and provided education to staff and the programme liaises with universities and schools and relevant charities to provide education services.

Regarding the national public awareness campaign, the HSE and national sepsis team are currently scoping out the optimum approach to a public awareness campaign to raise awareness of the signs and symptoms of sepsis and what action people should take if they suspect sepsis. It is envisaged that by increasing awareness of sepsis, the public will seek treatment earlier and, therefore, there will be a reduction in mortality associated with sepsis.

This new campaign is currently in a data gathering and research phase and will undergo engagement with families affected by sepsis and healthcare practitioners in the coming weeks.

Turning to quality assurance on the recognition and management of sepsis, retrospective audits against the national clinical guideline have been undertaken annually since the inception of the guideline, with the exception of 2020 and 2021 due to staff redeployment. Concurrent medical and surgical audits have been completed in all acute hospitals in 2023. Key learnings from the audits are used to improve care in the early recognition and management of sepsis. Paediatric audits will be completed by the end of the year, while maternity audits are scheduled are 2024. More than 95% of hospitals have a deteriorating patient committee, which includes sepsis. The national report for 2022 will be published in the coming weeks.

Regarding the five-year strategic plan, the national quality patient safety directorate and the clinical programme for sepsis have identified the priority areas for inclusion in the five-year sepsis strategic plan for the HSE. The plan will build on and enhance the existing priorities and work of the programme. The sepsis programme plan with clear objectives and outcomes for 2024 to 2026 will be completed by the end of this year.

Key priorities for the years 2024 to 2026 include addressing women’s health through sepsis awareness in pregnancy and post pregnancy, including the development of a public awareness campaign; the development of a quick reference guide for GPs on sepsis in children; a scope project on developing a flag system to be incorporated in all GP systems; the introduction of new metrics regarding sepsis governance, audit and education in acute hospitals to streamline deteriorating patient and sepsis programme key performance indicators, KPIs, and governance structures; and the development of a proposal to engage with academic and research partners to develop a research strategy for sepsis.

I thank Dr. Henry.

I apologise but I will have to leave shortly because I am due to speak in the Chamber.

I welcome the witnesses. They will have heard the harrowing stories we heard in the first part of the meeting. We were all taken aback at the shocking numbers of patients developing sepsis and the very high death rate from that. It is especially traumatic for families where a loved one dies in circumstances that are preventable, and great credit is due to the families who are attending this meeting and, indeed, the support organisation for trying to raise awareness of this issue.

All the witnesses who earlier appeared before the committee were exceptionally critical of the circumstances that exist within the health service. We want to address that, and we hope this will be a turning point for sepsis and the country's performance in regard to sepsis. It is an issue we are all keen to stick with and see through to achieve huge improvements. Some of those improvements were outlined to us earlier by the Stauntons in respect of the incredible work that they have done in the US, the Rory Staunton law that was introduced in the New York and the fact those changed arrangements, and the protocol in particular, have resulted in saving approximately 20,000 lives, which is a fantastic legacy.

How can we do something similar here by learning from what was done in New York and introducing that kind of protocol that will change the whole approach, not only among healthcare staff but also in terms of public awareness and training for healthcare staff? I was disappointed to hear about the level of public awareness, which is so important. The families told us earlier about how they had a battle with healthcare staff in regard to their family member to get them to consider the issue of sepsis. They were brushed aside and their concerns were dismissed. How are we to put the issue, or the possibility of sepsis, front and centre when a person with serious conditions within a hospital? I am concerned to hear the HSE is only at the point of scoping out the public awareness aspect at this stage. How can HSE learn from what has been achieved in New York and what is it doing to put in place those kinds of safeguards?

Dr. Colm Henry

Further information for healthcare workers in acute hospitals and in primary care is a priority, and that begins with setting standards, measuring outcomes against those standards and ensuring people are adequately trained. I might ask Dr. Healy to address how we stand against the measures introduced following the intervention of the Stauntons in New York.

Dr. Orla Healy

Indeed, Mr. Staunton addressed our sepsis conference in September, and we have compared and contrasted the interventions in New York state in Rory's law with the actions that have taken place in Ireland. A sepsis guideline, which is a mandated guideline, was developed through the national centre for clinical effectiveness, dating as far back as 2013, and it has been continuously updated. In addition to that guideline, we have early warning scores in this country and they too are mandated. As part of the guideline, mandatory training for relevant staff was instituted, so doctors and nurses in our system are mandated to be trained. Many of the provisions made in Rory's law, therefore, are in place in this country, albeit under a different framework.

In regard to public awareness, the priority for the programme at the outset was addressing the area where mortality was highest, namely, the acute hospital setting. As was stated in the opening statement, there is a documented reduction in mortality of 20% since the introduction of the guideline and the mandatory training. Lest the perception be that all sepsis is preventable, regrettably, it is not, and I will allow my front-line clinical colleagues to discuss that in more detail at a later stage. There has been a reduction in mortality in the acute hospital setting, addressing areas where early intervention had the potential to impact on outcomes. Following on from acute hospitals, we moved on to GP awareness, and that GP quick reference guide is nearing completion.

In regard to public awareness, the next priority, that is well under way-----

Okay, we have heard that. The HSE is at the scoping stage, which seems incredible at this stage of people's awareness------

Dr. Orla Healy

I have the timeline for that media campaign and it is going to the media company in December-----

I welcome the fact it is happening, but we have to ask why it is happening only now. It seems rather late in the day.

One of the other criticisms, certainly in the context of Lil Red's campaign, was that every time representatives meet somebody from the HSE, it is a different person. That seems to indicate a lack of focus within the HSE or insufficient seniority being made available to meet representatives of that campaign. In the brief time I have remaining, will the witnesses explain what a "mandated guideline" means? How many staff have been trained at this stage and is there also a training module within medical schools?

Dr. Colm Henry

I might take the first issue and ask Dr. Healy to comment on the guideline question. I have met representatives of the Lil Red campaign and am open to meeting representatives of any campaign, as with any other advocacy group, on this issue. This is a high priority for us in our overall patient safety strategy and I would welcome any input from either the Hughes family or anybody else.

Dr. Orla Healy

On the question of meeting representatives of the Lil Red campaign and Joanne Curran, I have met them myself and our programme manager meets them regularly. Staff change roles within the organisation but it is the most senior members of the team who meet people continuously, and Dr. O’Dwyer has also met representatives. That the representatives have met different people just reflects the fact people change roles within the organisation, but they are always more senior members of staff.

On the mandatory training, sepsis training is embedded in undergraduate and postgraduate training. It is on the curricula for those who are training.

For instance, it is part of the advanced life support training in paediatrics as well as emergency department and other specialties. There is an online module in HSeLanD. That is monitored locally through nursing practice development units and it is on the employment records for non-consultant hospital staff.

What percentage of healthcare workers have done that training?

Dr. Orla Healy

The priority for next year is for us to aggregate and collate that information nationally and centrally as a national clinical audit so that we can access and provide that data nationally. Heretofore it has been mandated and monitored locally on the ground and, therefore, within our strategic development, we will develop a national clinical audit that will produce that information nationally.

It will be next year by the time the HSE has that.

Dr. Orla Healy

Yes, it will.

Is Deputy Durkan or Deputy Colm Burke next?

Dr. Healy mentioned it is not always possible to save the patient or that is what I got from it. It is if it is caught in time. That is the difference. Only the patients who walk or are carried into a surgery or emergency department are in the position to be able to identify their own condition insofar as they can. I recall a doctor in the old Eastern Health Board telling me that the patient knows best. It is a matter of conveying that to the medical person dealing with it. If the issue can be identified at a sufficiently early stage, it is simple.

Patients are often brought into emergency departments in the middle of the night who may have a pre-existing condition or have had surgery recently and they may not be feeling well. It is a question of the alacrity with which their case is dealt rather than sitting and waiting for an hour or five. It may be too late then because their condition has advanced to the extent that it is irreversible. A number of interventions could be made at this stage and they are very simple. A previous delegation has emphasised the issues to watch out for by GPs - and they generally do so but GPs have a big turnover – so they are aware that this could be the case. It might be too late to do anything about it in the morning. If it is 9 o'clock on a Friday evening, there is no good telling a patient to come back on Monday. It will not work that way. It is urgent and urgent now. I have mentioned at a committee meeting previously about how many of our emergency departments are grossly overcrowded, some with non-emergency requirements. That needs to be dealt with as well. Patients need to be segregated so that those who have a drug or alcohol problem get treatment but they go in one particular direction or another and are dealt with. Then there are patients who are there for another purpose, many of whom are in great pain. I have experience of this recently and saw how many of them are in really severe pain where it showed on their faces. The quicker they are seen and triaged, the better. That should be a full triage, not half a triage as often happens when the place is overcrowded and people can wait four, five or six hours and still not be treated or triaged. We need to change the situation so that those who appear to be in urgent need get online for treatment as soon as possible.

We do not know what happens in an emergency department until we go there ourselves and it can be quite an arresting experience. We can see for the first time what other people have seen and suffered before and repeatedly. I am repeating what was said in conversation on repeal of the eighth amendment when I had a row with a senior medical person who said that sepsis was very rare in this country and more or less dismissed it. That was four or five years ago. When I asked how many instances there had been in the past 12 months, he said three or four.

Does the Deputy want to let the witnesses respond?

I had dealt with three or four cases and I told him that they must have all come to me and I doubt that. It is a much more serious issue than has been recognised heretofore. The emphasis has to be on speed in identifying the issue and in getting the treatment. The difference could be between 10 p.m. or 9 a.m., but if the patient has to wait and they are at an advanced stage, it is too late. It has run its course and it is irreversible.

The Deputy needs to give witnesses a chance to respond.

Dr. Colm Henry

We triage people a certain way in the emergency department. There are a number of time-quick admissions, which demand that patients go down a treatment pathway, whether it is a heart attack or a stroke. I will ask my Dr. O’Dwyer and Dr. Martin to describe what happens in the adult and paediatric wards succinctly, if they can, given the time pressures, in streaming patients and how we identify them.

Dr. Michael O'Dwyer

It is very true that the earlier patients are treated, the better the chances of survival. Lots of international research demonstrates that. The mainstay of treatment is antibiotics and then support. I am afraid it is not true that it is all reversible, even with early treatment. I work in an intensive care unit. I have been by the bedside when patients have developed sepsis, with all the supports in the world, and they still pass away. That is the reason we are here. It is an insidious, deadly, swift disease. Patients absolutely do better when they receive antibiotics quickly but it is not associated with 100% survival even then.

Dr. Ciara Martin

I am a children’s emergency consultant and have worked for more than 20 years. Sepsis is one of those areas that we all fear and need to act really quickly on. There have been improvements with, say, vaccinations so we do not see the same number of children coming in with florid meningitis, for example. The emphasis is getting treatment to families as soon as possible and also trying to understand the more subtle signs. Both Deputies Durkan and Shortall mentioned that the parents often know better. We really teach all our staff that if a parent is concerned that is a red flag for us, so much so that it is built in to the paediatric early warning score. Every child coming into an inpatient unit is scored on an early warning score and the parent concern is the top line on that.

I thank Dr. Martin. I have to move on.

I welcome our witnesses. Dr. Henry heard the testimony and evidence of the advocate groups and family members earlier. I am sure he was as taken by it as I was. Given the nature of the joint committee, we hear an awful lot, but as I said in my opening remarks, it is very rare one gets stopped in one’s tracks. This morning was one of those occasions.

I want to go into what we can do in a moment. What was most important today was a call for action and we, as a committee, will ensure that we get action. Can I get a short answer on whether there is more that can be done in this space?

Dr. Colm Henry

Yes.

Then the follow-up questions are: what can be done and how? That is what we want to do. I did not attend the sepsis conference.

A member of my staff was. I was due to attend but I was called away. A few issues that came up at the conference were fed back to me. One was that the sepsis programme needs a publicly funded research nurse in every hospital. Is that a priority?

Dr. Colm Henry

We have a number of priorities, which we have tried to outline, including awareness-----

I will come to those. I am asking about this one. I want to go through these. I know there are other priorities. Is having a publicly funded research nurse in every hospital possible and is it on the agenda?

Dr. Colm Henry

It is certainly on the agenda, but as regards the hierarchy of priorities for preventing sepsis and intervening earlier, the education, training and awareness piece is a higher priority.

Okay. Questions were raised about the effectiveness of the mandatory national guidelines and whether they need to be reviewed. Certainly, the feedback from the conference was that they do. Is that a priority?

Dr. Colm Henry

All guidelines are continuously reviewed. I will ask Dr. O'Dwyer to briefly describe the reviews since the document was first produced in 2014.

Dr. Michael O'Dwyer

In 2014 when our national clinical guidelines were produced, it was not done solely in Ireland. We collaborated closely with international colleagues and the international Surviving Sepsis Campaign, specifically. It provides guidelines for the treatment of sepsis and we adopted most of its recommendations. That is what is in the national clinical guidelines which follow the international best evidence. Those guidelines are reviewed every two to three years. Sometimes supplementary material is added, for example, around Covid-19, which brought with it a pandemic of sepsis. There were different suggestions about how to treat Covid-related sepsis. We tried to get those guidelines out to the hospitals at the time. Our guidelines are guided by international best practice.

Okay. I thank Dr. O'Dwyer.

Dr. Henry mentioned the need for greater awareness among the public and also among healthcare professionals. That was also one of the requests. Is there a national sepsis strategy?

Dr. Colm Henry

We mentioned it in the opening statement. I will ask Dr. Healy to speak about it.

Dr. Orla Healy

We have a two-year plan and the strategy-----

A plan is different from a strategy.

Dr. Orla Healy

The strategy is in development. We have identified the priorities for the next two years.

What year does Dr. Healy expect it to be in place?

Dr. Orla Healy

We are moving into consultation on the strategy, having identified the immediate priorities for the next two years. The strategy is on our agenda for 2024.

We have to move on quickly from words like "on the agenda" and get to a point where things are in place. I have heard about several conferences on sepsis. We hear it is "on the agenda" and "it will happen" and so on, but we need to get to a place where it is happening. How many whole-time equivalent staff are working on the current plan whose job is only to deal with the sepsis plan?

Dr. Orla Healy

Our sepsis programme is linked to our early warning and deteriorating patient programme because they are closely aligned. The Deputy will have heard that the early warning score has sepsis embedded within it so they-----

I understand that but the question I asked is how many staff?

Dr. Orla Healy

They are shared between the two areas. We have a programme manager for the early warning score and sepsis programme. We have seven directors of nursing - every hospital group has a director of nursing - two additional nurses working on early warning scores, administrative staff who are a shared resource nationally and an assistant national director for quality improvement, within whose brief sepsis is included.

I will make a point to the Chair. All members have accepted that we want to make this one of the key priorities for this committee. We need to have quarterly meetings with Dr. Henry in private. We can hold them at the Department of Health if necessary or at the HSE offices, whatever suits. The first part has to be to get a comprehensive note from Dr. Henry about where the current plan is, where the strategy is, when it will be in place and what that will mean. Then we need to take the lessons from what has happened in New York and elsewhere and the issues raised by the witnesses today. We want to bring urgency to this. Things cannot happen overnight, but some can happen more quickly. That is something for us to agree at a private session of the Joint Committee on Health, but if we will bring a focus to this, we have to do it and I argue that is the approach we should take. Would Dr. Henry support that?

Dr. Colm Henry

Absolutely.

Dr. Orla Healy

If I may, I should have added that we also have a clinical lead and a GP lead.

I thank our witnesses. I will start with something mentioned in the opening statement, the changed landscape as regards sepsis and infections in hospitals since the Covid-19 pandemic. In other jurisdictions, prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, some of the sepsis strategies I looked at had things, especially for children, around ensuring vaccine roll-outs were effective and comprehensive. That sometimes infections such as pneumonia, flu or meningitis were underlying issues was part of the strategy and vaccine roll-outs were part of the sepsis story. I was interested to see that, in his opening statement, Dr. Henry referred to the increase in group A strep. Will he expand on how vaccines relate to sepsis and the public health programmes that are already in place and on what changes Covid-19 has brought to the issue?

Dr. Colm Henry

It is an interesting question because Covid-19 brought significant disruption in so many ways, apart from the obvious ways to every individual life in the country. Covid-19 behaved differently because there was no immunity in the population and no vaccine. In its initial state it had a very high rate of conversion to serious illness, to people needing intensive care and to death. The vaccine was a radical intervention. We now have data from the Health Protection Surveillance Centre, HPSC, that estimates, based on the impact of the vaccine programme between December 2021 and March 2023, there were 16,000 fewer deaths than would have been expected without the vaccine programme, almost 4,000 fewer admissions to intensive care - which we would not have been able to facilitate because we did not have the capacity - and 100,000 fewer hospitalisations than would have been expected. We now know through analysis the impact the vaccine programme has had.

In parallel with other European countries, we saw an unexpected rise in invasive group A streptococcus from the autumn of last year until April-May of this year. The numbers have levelled off significantly again. We saw annual figures rise from a predictable level of 150 cases to more than 400 cases, with a higher proportion of those affected being children. We are used to the same number every year and the same percentage of those affected being children. We saw a higher absolute number and 45% of those affected were children. Sadly, there were some cases of mortality. Those rates have levelled off again to where they were before the surge. Why did it happen? There are many theories. The HPSC is linking with European partners to do research to look at the factors that led to the unexpected surge in invasive group A streptococcus that was seen throughout Europe. We do not have the answer yet. There are many theories, some of which I would say are uninformed, linking it to vaccines. There is no evidence that is the case. As I outlined, the evidence from analysis of the Covid-19 vaccination programme is that many lives were saved.

We have seen a fall-off in uptake of the primary childhood vaccinations, including those against measles, mumps, rubella and meningitis, which is troubling. We heard from Dr. Martin that meningitis is now a rare illness in hospitals thanks to the vaccination programme. We should never take for granted the huge gains that were made in not seeing measles anymore, so much so that doctors in training would not recognise these conditions now. We are concerned about the rate of drop-off. We have put together a special task force in the HSE.

Can Dr. Henry give a number for the drop-off rates?

Dr. Colm Henry

It is different for each component of the primary vaccination programme. For measles, because it is so contagious, we would like to see a population uptake of about 95%.

That is to get herd immunity.

Dr. Colm Henry

Yes. We are seeing levels of below 90% and in some geographical areas, it is lower than that.

Am I correct in saying that vaccine programmes are part of how we deal with sepsis, particularly for children?

Dr. Colm Henry

Absolutely. Dr. Martin may wish to comment on that. It is core to prevention.

Dr. Ciara Martin

There is no vaccine for sepsis but we know that Covid, flu and other illnesses do contribute to the environment where sepsis can take hold of a patient. The free flu vaccine uptake in children was low last year and we identified that as a possible factor, so this year our public health doctors are in the schools. They are going into senior infants' classes in school to encourage uptake of this free nasal vaccine that is painless. They are all interlinked, including that vaccine and chickenpox vaccine, which we will, hopefully, bring in soon.

In the previous session, we spoke about which medical professionals would benefit from training in sepsis. I notice that in other jurisdictions, there is a possibility for sepsis certification as part of postgraduate education for pharmacists. If a small child presents with flu-like symptoms, a pharmacist would be able to say that it is not flu and the child should be brought to the emergency department immediately. Are we doing this or looking at it in Ireland?

Dr. Colm Henry

It is every healthcare worker's duty to be aware of sepsis because it can present at any time anywhere and in unpredictable, sometimes atypical ways. I will ask Dr. O'Dwyer to address the Deputy's question about the different healthcare workers and what we are trying to do to direct training and raise awareness.

Dr. Michael O'Dwyer

On the in-hospital piece, we have a model for adult sepsis and one for paediatric sepsis and all medical and relevant staff must take that module and get it signed off on their employment record. That is currently monitored at local level but we will bring it to national level next year.

The pre-hospital piece has become a key focus of the programme over the past 12 months because we have been embedded in the hospitals for previous years and now we are really focusing on pre-hospital. This is why we have a GP lead who is based in Dungarvan and provides education to GPs nationally. She is developing a state-of-the-art document on treatment of sepsis within primary care. We developed a leaflet at the end of the summer that we circulated throughout all GPs and community pharmacies. Our previous programme manager was a pharmacist. She has delivered training to trainee GPs on sepsis so it is certainly on our radar and something we are pushing.

I thank the witnesses for the work they are doing in this area. One issue that arises is the changeover of junior doctors in our hospital system. Are the witnesses satisfied that we have comprehensive programme for dealing with that changeover, which tends to happen in January and June or July? Are they satisfied that we have enough processes in place to make sure the new doctors who are coming on stream know what they need to know? Some of them are coming into the Irish health system while others may be changing from hospital to hospital where there is a different focus compared with what they were doing. They might have been doing paediatrics in the last hospital and are now dealing with a totally different area like surgery. What programme is run in each hospital every six months?

Dr. Colm Henry

I will ask Dr. O'Dwyer to come in on that. Through what we call the doctors integrated management e-system, DIME, we have an employment record of each junior doctor and can track his or her transition from hospital to hospital. When junior doctors go to a new hospital, part of their induction is mandatory training along from learning the ins and outs of working in a hospital and who to contact for which services. This kicks in when people go to a new hospital.

Dr. Michael O'Dwyer

There are mandatory online modules for paediatric and adult sepsis that junior doctors must complete. It is important to say that junior doctors in training receive a lot of education and training on the floor every day from their senior colleagues and sepsis is one of those topics I see-----

Am I correct in saying there were something like 13,000 cases of people admitted to hospital with sepsis in 2021? I know there may have been other complications but I have seen that about 2,700 people died in 2021 in hospitals who had sepsis. I am not saying that sepsis was the sole cause of death but it was a contributory factor. Am I right in respect of those figures?

Dr. Michael O'Dwyer

The figures are probably underestimated in the sense that they count acute public hospital admissions but do not take account of community hospitals and the private sector. It is very dependent on coding so if the code is incorrect and somebody is labelled as having pneumonia when it should be sepsis, it does not get picked up in the numbers. Our best estimate is 13,000 but I suspect that the number is probably higher. Among those 13,000, the mortality rate in Ireland is about 20%.

Everyone tends to focus on consultants and junior doctors. If you go into a hospital, the same nursing staff will be there ten years later, so there is that continuity. What programme is in place for nurses on an ongoing basis to make sure they are able to get up-to-date information, including about the new challenges that arise in respect of dealing with something like this?

Dr. Michael O'Dwyer

Nurses are mandated to do that same training module and to renew that module every three years. Since they do not move around as much as junior doctors, it is a bit easier to keep track of the compliance rates for nurses but they use the same module.

With regard to the identification of sepsis, has any study been done from the time a person is admitted to hospital where he or she might have come in with some other complaint to the time that sepsis is then identified? Is there any information showing how quickly sepsis can be identified? Is a study ongoing with regard to this issue?

Dr. Michael O'Dwyer

Of sepsis cases within hospitals, about 80% involve patients who come in with sepsis, while about 20% involve patients who develop sepsis. We know uncontroversially that the earlier people receive treatment, the better their outcomes will be. There is a huge global network of research and commercial entities looking for that quick diagnostic that indicates whether it is a case of sepsis. This is not available at the moment. It is not like heart attacks or strokes. You cannot do a CT scan or an ECG. Sepsis masquerades as many different diseases. We do not have a test that provides a definitive "Yes" or "No", which is a real shortcoming but an international one.

One of the other challenges we face in the health service, particularly at weekends, is one I referenced at the start of the meeting. A young boy of eight who died recently was admitted to hospital but, unfortunately, the degree to which he had sepsis meant there was little the hospital could have done. I understand that he immediately went on life support when he was admitted to hospital. Access to doctors at weekends is a significant challenge for people. Are there enough processes in place for someone, particularly a child, who is unwell and is trying to get to a GP and does not want to go into an emergency department? Are the witnesses satisfied that there is enough information available to enable a parent to make a decision that this is far more serious than just going to the GP?

Dr. Michael O'Dwyer

That is the whole purpose of what we are planning for our public awareness campaign. We have chipped away at this with what we do every year with media presentations over the course of world sepsis month and the leaflets we circulated earlier this year. A core part of what we want to do is that public awareness piece where we describe the symptoms of sepsis to parents and carers so they know to take it more seriously than a run-of-the-mill infection. It is difficult to diagnose, treat and recognise in hospitals so it is going to be difficult to diagnose and recognise at home but we are going to try to get that information out there as best we can.

Dr. O'Dwyer accepts there is a problem, particularly at weekends, getting access to GPs. Three to four crucial hours may be missed.

Dr. Michael O'Dwyer

Certainly in the hospital sector, all of the diagnostic tests and individuals needed to treat these people when they come in as emergency cases are available.

Dr. Colm Henry

We do not have enough GPs per head of population. We have a plan in place to draw level with the Scottish ratio, and we have a geographical disparity in GP provision. One issue I wanted to raise is that in our messaging rarely do we deal with issues in isolation in healthcare and medicine. One of the issues we also want to convey, which is a very important part of preventing sepsis, is that we do not take actions at a population level to promote antimicrobial resistance. We also have to convey a message to people that common viral illnesses do not merit antibiotic provision. We measure through our local hospital and through GPs how often we use antibiotics and whether usage is going up or down. We have seen in recent years a drop-off in those resistant bugs such as methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus, MRSA, and vancomycin-resistant enterococci, VRE, and others through more prudent use of antibiotics. The message we give is we want to increase awareness of sepsis and we want early intervention to promote better outcomes but on a population level we do not want people to resort to antibiotics for every single potential infection that is there, especially viral infections which do not warrant antibiotics.

I have read the opening statements and have some questions. Last year, 13,300 patients in the acute hospital system had sepsis, of whom approximately 2,700 died. Are there regional variances in that? Are there certain hospital groups in which there are peaks and troughs in those figures? I do not like to describe loss of life in that way but are there higher incidences in certain parts of the country?

Dr. Colm Henry

Yes, the report describes regional aspects, and I will ask Dr. O'Dwyer to comment on this.

Dr. Michael O'Dwyer

We look at regional differences in outcome based on case mix, age and comorbidities. In the event we find outliers, we feed back to the hospitals and talk to them about their sepsis committees, their protocols and any issues that might be happening. Since I have been looking at the sepsis reports, there have been no specific outliers within the hospital groups for excess mortality that would be of concern. All the hospital groups I have seen have been within expected outcome-----

Where are there high and low incidences? I know it is a small snapshot but for the benefit of the committee.

Dr. Michael O'Dwyer

I would need to look at the latest report.

I did my own research on sepsis. Sepsis itself is not contagious but some of the infections that lead to sepsis can be contagious. Where there is sepsis in the hospital environment, we all know how MRSA and the winter vomiting bug are dealt with, but are there certain protocols that happen in the wider hospital context? I am particularly thinking of hospital systems such as University Hospital Limerick, UHL, where there could be many people on trolleys and overcrowding issues. Does that play into the management decisions made in that moment or over those few days?

Dr. Colm Henry

There were well-established protocols in hospitals for dealing with different types of infection depending on how contagious they were before the pandemic, including clostridium difficile and, as the Deputy referenced, MRSA, where the practice is to isolate and to ensure that the risk is not passed onto other patients. We are dealing with greatly varying infrastructure in our hospitals apart from any deficit in capacity and hospital beds. There are some very new hospitals with many single rooms and others have shared wards. Our hospitals as they are configured and built are not attuned to the reduction of transmission of infection disease and that was thrown into stark evidence during the Covid-19 pandemic when we had to urgently build extra capacity and streamline patients and ensure we cohorted patients with Covid-19. I will ask Dr. O'Dwyer to comment on any additional work we do. What we attempt to do, but do not always succeed, is to isolate patients or to cohort them.

Dr. Michael O'Dwyer

As we said, before Covid-19 was sepsis. When patients had severe Covid-19, they needed to be isolated and, by and large, were isolated. Leaving Covid-19 aside, a very small number of other causes of sepsis is contagious and needs to be isolated. Perhaps something like influenza and a couple of types of meningitis might need a short period of isolation but the vast majority is not contagious from patient to patient.

We are not privy to all the protocols and that is where we trust our medical professionals but surely there is a laboratory test or blood sampling. Is that the case?

Dr. Colm Henry

It depends on the bug in question because different organisms cause sepsis. Dr. Martin, for example, mentioned-----

How frequently would it require a blood sample to go to a laboratory? My angle is that some hospitals, for example University Maternity Hospital Limerick, have no in-hospital laboratory. I witnessed this at first-hand when my wife was in labour. There is a ludicrous situation where taxis have to bring blood samples across to the laboratory in UHL and results can take a few hours. I heard in the opening statements this morning from the groups and the families of people who died and some who survived that time is critical. What if there is no laboratory in the hospital?

Dr. Colm Henry

There are two issues, and I will ask my colleagues to comment. There are critical tests to be taken of course; one is a blood lactate, which is part of our actions, and the second is isolation of the organism. However, it is very clear in the sepsis 6 and in the education module that action needs to be taken, not necessarily waiting for the results of tests. It goes back to what Dr. O'Dwyer said, there is no single test. It is based on a high index of suspicion clinically. People should know, and certainly it is part of training even going back to my day as a new doctor, to act when you suspect rather than wait for tests. Availability of tests is important particularly microbiology laboratories but acting before getting the results based on clinical suspicion is probably more important.

Dr. Henry's colleagues are going to come in-----

I will give Deputy Crowe extra time.

Dr. Ciara Martin

I want to emphasise that is exactly how we treat it. If someone suspects a patient has sepsis, there are indications and rules to apply within that first hour, so yes he or she sends bloods if a blood sample can be taken from the patient; sometimes it can be difficult. However, treatment is started immediately, including oxygen, fluids and antibiotics and then one waits to see when the blood results come back.

My final question relates to the time when a patients are admitted into hospital, usually through accident and emergency, triaged and a few hours go by before they are properly seen. It is a big bugbear of mine that we do not have a national digital patient record system. We have different hospital groups and paper charts but people often are so unwell when they present that they are unable properly and effectively to answer questions when being triaged. When I did my own research before the meeting, and I am no expert on sepsis, I noted that there is a repeat incidence of sepsis of approximately 40% in the adult population. Is there any record of significance or worth kept in the hospital system so that if John, Mary or anyone else has had sepsis come in through accident and emergency and going through the triage system, there is a record of that? It concerns me that, as I said many times at this committee, more is known digitally about the cars we drive, the NCT system has a depth of information on cars, and we know more about animals, but we do not know enough about patients. Humans coming through the hospital system have to go through all this series of questions when there could be critical information about a past history of sepsis that is unknown, undetected and we are playing with that time-critical factor as well. Is there any detail retained in the hospital system on that?

Dr. Colm Henry

In the absence of a record, we rely on information in the GP's referral letter if that is the source of referral. At the point of entry to hospital, the hospital will have access to previous laboratory and X-ray results and patient notes. What is really important and raised by the Deputy's question is the notion of triage because in the world of emergency departments, triage categorises patients into their level of risk. That is independent of the condition they have. When we are talking about sepsis or indeed heart attacks or stroke, we are talking about early identification of one particular clinical syndrome that requires fast-tracking along the route that was described by Dr. Martin, that is, that three things that must be taken and three things must be given, according to sepsis 6. Therefore, yes, there is information available. It is not an electronic healthcare record. That would give us much richer information on patients wherever they may present, be it in GP clinics or hospitals. What is critical to what we are trying to ensure is core to the practice of every healthcare professional, be it a hospital emergency department or the community, is-----

Is it a mandatory question in triage? Is a patient in triage always asked whether he or she had sepsis previously, given there is a 40% repeat incidence?

Dr. Colm Henry

Patients are asked about their past history.

With the greatest respect, a member of my family passed away five weeks ago. When being discharged from the acute system, he said he had overcome a lot and that he had cancer a few years ago. You could see people's jaws drop because they did not know this man had the type of cancer he had.

We are not medical people; the medical people sit across from us in a hospital environment. You depend on those questions to elicit information. Someone might not think it is relevant, seven or eight years on, to say they had sepsis. Yet, it is a scientific fact that 40% of people who have had sepsis will have repeat sepsis so surely it should be a mandatory question in the triage. You will not always elicit the information unless it is explicitly asked. I am no medical expert but surely if we are upgrading the protocols every two years that should be a mandatory question for whoever is in the room.

It is a fair point if it was a question of ticking boxes, bearing in mind the number of people who are getting sepsis. Maybe that is something we can follow up on.

I appreciate the Cathaoirleach letting me in because I am not a member of this committee but I am a member of the Committee on Public Petitions and the Ombudsmen and we have discussed sepsis there. While watching and contributing to another committee meeting this morning, I heard part of Dr. Henry's address. I want to ask about children, particularly those with disabilities, who have lost their lives from sepsis. I will not mention any cases but I have a particular case which is heartbreaking, because the parents are left behind. Are there special teams in the hospital for where a child is not able to tell a parent they have a sore throat or chest? Do we have special teams that can communicate with the family on this?

Dr. Colm Henry

I will ask Dr. Martin to answer as she is a front-line paediatrician in CHI.

Dr. Ciara Martin

Paediatrics looks after children from zero up to 16. For a number of the children and babies who come in, you cannot ask the same questions you would ask of an adult. When children come into paediatric departments and they are seen by the specially trained nurses and doctors, there are teams that are trained and you are trained to listen to the parents, look at the child and understand the vital signs and what they mean. Sometimes we need to hold onto a child for a little while to observe them and see how they are getting on. We need to see if they are sleeping and feeding or if they seem to be in pain. The answer to the Senator's question is that it is part of our training in paediatrics. Disability is a particular area where that comes into play because the children of seven or eight who may have an intellectual or physical disability need special consideration, and that is always part of our approach.

I know that when kids are young and they get sick, parental instinct should never be overlooked. I was glad to hear Dr. Martin mention that earlier because parental instinct is important to me. We all have to accept that the medical people are the experts but maybe parental instinct is not always taken into account and something that should have been treated on day one goes into day two. Sadly we have the loss of life of a little girl as a result, which caused great grief to the parents and all left behind. Do we get involved with parents enough and take enough account of parental instinct? I will not mention any case but I hear back from these people is that on the first evening, while the hospital tried to help out, it did not seem to be on top of it. On evening two, the parents will say that it was colossal and that a great many people were involved in trying to save the child. Sadly it was too late. There might be a feeling out there that parental instinct should be at the top of the list when people arrive at a hospital in this situation, particularly a child with a disability who is not able to tell their parents or anybody else they have a sore throat, pain or whatever.

Dr. Ciara Martin

I agree.

I have a few questions. A question was asked about blood tests and if sepsis would show up on a blood test. People are looking for simple steps that can be taken with sepsis. The witnesses might expand on what they said earlier on that. I know there are all sorts of challenges around it but some families have said to me that if a simple blood test had been carried out early on then that might have been the solution to it. Is it that simple or can other steps be taken with this issue?

Dr. Colm Henry

I will ask Dr. O'Dwyer to come in on this. He has addressed this earlier, in that the Holy Grail is a single test, which does not exist, but there is huge international collaboration.

Dr. Michael O'Dwyer

The diagnosis is incredibly complicated. The gold standard test is a blood culture test. A sample of blood is taken and you look for bacteria within that blood culture. We know that in patients who almost definitely have sepsis, that is only positive in about 40% of cases and it takes 48 hours or so to become positive, so it is not of any use when the patient comes in the door. Then there is a combination of different blood tests to look at the patient's immune response that can give an indication that something is going on but it is not definitive for sepsis. I go to conferences every year and a new test comes out every year but it is never proven robust in big clinical trials. Like we have said earlier, the easiest thing is to give everybody antibiotics when they come in the door. We cannot do that because of emerging antimicrobial resistance and allergic and adverse reactions. The solution to the diagnosis issue has been sought for many years and we are getting closer. The diagnostics are better but they are nowhere near perfect.

I am conscious that there is a public information element to this in the symptoms that people get. These include low blood pressure, fever and increased heart rate. Further, Lil Red’s Legacy Sepsis Awareness Campaign talks about shivering fever, feeling very cold, extreme pain or discomfort, pale or discoloured skin, being sleepy and difficult to rouse, being confused, feeling like you might die and being short of breath. That is not to frighten people at home or to make them think their child has that. If someone has a sense of something and they know their own child, they might tick one or two of those boxes. Is there anything the witnesses would like to add to that?

Dr. Colm Henry

There are two elements to this. The distinct transition from childhood to adulthood is not exact. There are different types of presentations, from children to adults, and Senator Murphy has highlighted the challenges among disabled children. In the interests of the public information exercise the Cathaoirleach mentioned, which is appropriate, I will ask Dr. Martin to comment on the signs or symptoms that parents might want to look out for and then Dr. O'Dwyer might describe how it is a little bit simpler in the adult world, although it is still not exact.

Dr. Ciara Martin

Public awareness is extremely important but it is also hard. We are sitting here saying sepsis is difficult to diagnose when you come into a hospital, even with laboratory tests. To put pressure on parents to be the diagnosticians is wrong. What we have done and what we are doing, including with Lil Red’s Legacy Sepsis Awareness Campaign, is highlighting to parents when they should seek medical help and when they should worry about their children, particularly in children as Dr. Henry mentioned. It is different if you have a baby. We say to pay attention and that if they have a fever you need to go and seek help, particularly if the temperature is over 38°C or 38.5°C. When it comes to whether the baby is feeding or vomiting or has wet nappies, that can be a lot of different infections, from a respiratory syncytial virus, RSV, infection to an early sepsis infection. A lot of it is helping parents understand what to look out for. We have a lot of information on mychild.ie for families to look at and in recent years we have tried to improve that to say on the website what there is to worry about for children.

Teenagers are particularly difficult and that came through in some of the talks from the families this morning. It is that restlessness and that pain out of proportion to what you would expect. Particularly with sepsis, a child who is not getting better or who seems to be getting better on the first day and then gets sicker again is a red flag that we ask people to look for and to look for medical help then.

Dr. Michael O'Dwyer

The principles in the adult are very much the same. They present slightly differently, but an adult can say what is going on. The underlying thing is you must have an infection. Sepsis may be the presentation of that infection. You may not know you have an infection. It is important to know you can develop sepsis even if you are on antibiotics. If you have gone to the GP and have had antibiotics, you are probably okay but it does not mean you are definitely going to be okay. Sometimes the only things our elderly population will come in with are confusion, slurred speech and feeling out of sorts. That is frequently a sign of a urinary tract infection or pneumonia. Then we run through the sepsis acronym: extreme shivering; extreme temperatures; not peeing; the same as the paediatric cohort, they will tell you they think they are going to die; shortness of breath; and blue lips. It is a constellation of different types of symptoms. In older people, confusion in the setting of a known infection is a sign of developing sepsis.

Something which came up in the previous session and which we talk about all the time is a greater role for pharmacies. I think we are all in favour of that. Do the witnesses see that as an area we could concentrate on in this strategy?

Dr. Michael O'Dwyer

Yes. It is notable that when we circulated the sepsis leaflet a few months ago, it was to GPs and community pharmacies. They play a pivotal role. They may be the first people to see the patients or children as they come in the door. We would encourage an education programme among pharmacies to recognise the signs of sepsis.

Dr. Henry stated that 1,600 GPs attended the webinar on sepsis. It is quite a high number and that is positive. How many GPs do we have that did not attend? I do not want to be negative.

Dr. Colm Henry

I think our national figure is approaching 4,000. I am not sure of the exact number.

The other issue concerned the different approaches. This is a concern that if we have a protocol it should be the same approach. We are talking about different approaches in relation to acute hospitals and not necessarily just that but also other health settings. Is that part of the protocol the HSE is looking to roll out?

Dr. Colm Henry

If you look at the history to date of the awareness campaign, it focused initially on acute hospitals where sick patients go, but there is an increasing focus on awareness among primary care because that is where people initially present. As the committee has heard this morning, it is a time-critical condition and early intervention increases the chances of a successful outcome, including survival. That is why our focus is increasingly not just on consolidation, which we need to do, but on continuously recycling our education and awareness programme in hospitals and bringing it into the community. There is a very receptive GP community, as evidenced by the turnout at the webinar.

Dr. Henry said the quick reference guide to GPs' recognition and treatment of sepsis in adults will be ready for implementation in quarter 2 2024. I do not wish to put him on the spot but is it possible to fast-forward that roll-out? He might come back to us on that or answer now, given the urgency.

Dr. Colm Henry

It is a fair question. We will come back to the Cathaoirleach. We want to make sure when we get it out it is right and that we do not have to revise it immediately. We will come back with our timescale for that.

The committee will refer it back to our next meeting. Dr. Henry may be available to do that meeting. The families want to hear we will work collectively in a positive manner to come up with solutions to this crisis affecting so many people in the past and, no doubt, the future.

It is really good to see this debate taking place because Irish society is not tuned in enough to the dangers of sepsis. Most people do not know how many die annually from it or get sick with it. These committee debates are important and it is good to see our guests’ sincere attitude to getting more publicity to this situation.

It was a good exchange of ideas. Many things came out of this meeting. I hope we can inject greater urgency into it. I thank the families and organisations that came in, as well as the representatives of the HSE for their assistance to the committee on this important matter. It is useful for people. There is a public element to this.

The joint committee adjourned at 12.26 p.m. until 9.30 a.m. on Wednesday, 22 November 2023.
Barr
Roinn