I am the director of the Upstate Theatre Company which is 15 years old. In its early stages we developed a four strand policy. Upstate Local is about animating original works with community organisations and people in the community; Upstate Learning is about collaborating with educational institutions; Upstate Lab is about experimenting with the form; and Upstate Live is the professional wing of the company which has gone on tour nationally and internationally.
Today we are most concerned with Upstate Local because it is directly linked to the topic being discussed. We develop meaningful partnerships with local community organisations and jointly develop performance projects with non-professional local groups and citizens. They work in collaboration with artists to develop new material relating to interests, subjects and topics which they want to address.
We participate in local art and community development networks with our colleagues in Louth County Council. We place artists and facilitators in residence. We are involved in cross-Border programmes with communities in Northern Ireland and also internationally, and this made up a large part of the first seven years of the company's work.
The organisations we have worked with include Macra na Feirme in Termonfeckin with which we developed two major projects looking at rural isolation. One of the shows premiered in the Dublin Fringe Festival and was one of the first non-professional performances to be accepted into the festival. We deliver the arts module of the Drogheda youth sector computer scheme, which is second chance education involving teenagers who have dropped out of education. We collaborate with Drogheda Youth Development on a regular basis, taking some of its clients into our projects. We also worked with Droichead Youth Theatre and the Mosney refugee centre on a particular project in which young Irish citizens looked at the issue of refugees and asylum seekers in Ireland. It was carried out at the early stages of the influx of immigration into Ireland. It was most relevant to Louth because Mosney refugee centre is just outside Drogheda. Adult projects in Drogheda include intercultural projects. At present we are heavily involved with the African community. In one of our projects 12 different nationalities were represented which shows the diversity in the community. Irish people were also involved. We are also involved in local performances based on local oral history in a programme we have been running for the past two years. This testimony was collected in Drogheda 20 years ago and a local community cast presents it with the guidance of artists.
The EU-funded crossover project was cross-community and cross-Border. The youth groups involved came from Louth, Monaghan, Cavan, Fermanagh and south Tyrone. They were brought together at a central point every second week to work with the artists for a full Saturday to develop original material. It had the benefits I outlined when describing another project earlier and was aesthetically pleasing. Adult groups from Fermanagh, Monaghan and Louth worked in their areas and came together to share the work.
The general themes are personal and communal identity; investigating methods for devising original performances; collective storytelling; and presentation styles. New methods for devising original performances are important as no one set of rules or practice fits all groups. Generally, this is done in collaboration with the people themselves whereby we find what they are most comfortable with and develop it. Collective storytelling is self-explanatory; it is not about one person in a group deciding to write a performance or theatre piece for the group as instead it must be arrived at collectively. An important aspect of presentation style is choosing where to present a piece as well as how to present it. Sometimes the stage can be the biggest enemy of community theatre and it is necessary to take a piece from the stage or theatre and bring it to a locale or a more appropriate site for the skills of the performers and the story being told.
The practice involving the artists, who are an important element, and non-artists is always collaborative. It is also collective as the artist is briefed not to deliver a play but to ensure the collective processes are adhered to so there is a collective voice rather than one voice. The methods and practices we use must be accessible to all those who come through the door and ultimately it is participatory in nature.
Our funding partners are the Arts Council, the EU programme for peace and reconciliation, Create Louth, Drogheda Borough Council, Drogheda Partnership which was essential to the formation of the company, Louth Leader Partnership and previously the office of the Minister of State with responsibility for integration.
It may be too general to state this, and we can debate it later, but the ultimate purpose is to create a civic aesthetic space to be entered by any citizen for the exploration of self and community. It sounds like a grand mouthful but I am sure every cultural institution attempts to do the same. Another purpose is to develop access for all citizens via a number of partnerships which happen through local arts offices and youth and community development organisations. We also do this through open call by advertising in newspapers for people to come and play with us. Our purposes also include continuing to develop collective participatory methodologies. This is always of concern as we try to make our practice better. We look at how our European partners work and develop their methodologies and learn from them, as we always have. A further purpose is to develop conversations between the citizen artist and the artist citizen. I am sure my colleagues here will agree there is an innate creativity in every citizen and it is a matter of whether to tap into it and utilise it and whether an opportunity exists to do so. We also aim to ensure genuine conversation on the variety of aesthetic sensibilities innate in all people.
I concur with everything that has been stated on efficacy. Cultural expression, communication skills, self-confidence, self-motivation and socialisation are automatically part of the collaborative processes involved in creating theatre and art performances. Enough data exists, from the 1960s to the present, to underpin scientifically any claims made in these categories. "Access to rich cultural resources and participation in cultural activity interacting with social capital contributes to quality of life and well-being." I should have notes to tell me from where I got these words but I do not. It is generally accepted.
Utilising the arts to combat disadvantage for the young, the old and the socially disadvantaged and to encourage their greater inclusion in local communities is certainly something we do. Research data have been collected in Ireland. I am sure members of the committee are aware of the National Economic and Social Forum's report entitled, In the Frame or Out of the Picture: A Statistical Analysis of Public Involvement in the Arts, which does not make for comfortable reading in the context of the issue we are trying to address. It states: "Cultural inclusion is an equal right to participate in the nation's artistic and cultural life, to enjoy art, to make art, to participate in decisions about art, to comment vigorously on art, and to be active cultural citizens". The committee will probably agree that cultural inclusion can be thought of as a fundamental democratic right which, of course, it is, alongside the right to education and to participate in the formal democratic process. The main conclusion of the analysis is that involvement in the arts is strongly influenced by one's social and economic background. I am probably telling committee members things they already know, but people with lower educational attainment, of lower social class or on lower incomes are much less likely to be involved in the arts. That does not mean, however, that there is no interest in the arts among such persons; it is just that they are less likely to be involved in them. This finding does not apply only to the high arts such as classical music, the theatre and art exhibitions, it applies right across the spectrum, including mainstream films, comedy and popular music, as well as reading. Therefore, it is not just in the case of the high arts that there is a problem and it is interesting that the report includes a wide definition of the arts.
A substantial amount of revenue for the arts, and sport for that matter, is generated by the national lottery and, according to the report, the money is spent regressively. The method of collection increases the regressive transfer of wealth simply because lottery tickets are bought disproportionately by those of lower class. These findings which are similar in the case of sport mean that if overall policy does not explicitly and successfully target those in lower social economic groups, it is harder to justify the way the arts are funded.
Another finding from the research is that none of the mainstream arts organisations is required by any national policy or legislative provision to allocate funding to programmes which promote cultural inclusion. There is no legislation which states they have to do so, but that is not to say they do not. As we know, the Abbey Theatre has a fine outreach department. One of the problems to which my colleague referred is that there are interventions, but they need to be genuine intersections between arts organisations, community organisations and ultimately citizens. Investing in citizen artists, rather than just in art for the citizen is not an either-or debate; it is for both. The artist citizen is equally important in our programmes and projects as the citizen artist. As we have heard, sustained engagement is required, not occasional engagement. It needs to be sustained and programmatic, rather than being short-term and project-based. Quality outcomes are needed, not just quality outputs. Everybody wants quality outputs, but quality outcomes are very important in our work. Thankfully, we have seen great quality outputs. For instance, "Laundry" which won The Irish Times theatre award had five professional and 19 community actors. That is a fine example of how high aesthetic quality can be attained within programmes of this nature. Such programmes should be proactive and central, not just reactive and marginal.
In utilising the arts to combat disadvantage for the young one cannot look at what is in place and conclude it is equal. The goal of equality should be at the heart of this debate. Every citizen - certainly every public servant - should take the trouble to read, The Spirit Level: Why Equality is Better for Everyone. It is impossible to overstate the implications of this brave and transformative thesis, the conclusion of which is simple: we do better when we are equal. That goes not only for the cultural and arts sector but also for society in general. That is where we need to focus because everything else can flow from it.
As we move towards a new vision for the arts, including cultural accessibility and participation, it would do no harm to bear in mind the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, of which Article 27 states: "Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits". I hope that in that rant I have articulated something that will be of use to the committee.