Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Seanad Éireann díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 24 Apr 1991

Vol. 128 No. 9

Adjournment Matter. - Foyle Fisheries Commission Report.

First, I welcome the Minister to the House to respond to this motion. Last year I put down a similar motion regarding the river Foyle. The reason I raise this matter this evening is to highlight the need for the Minister for the Marine to report progress on the Foyle Fisheries Commission and the problems of alleged pollution of the river Foyle.

I am alarmed that the report of the Foyle Fisheries Commission dated 1987 is the latest available. I do not know of any other industry or any other project in Ireland, or in Europe, that would publish a report for 1987 on an important industry and make it available on 28 June 1990. I suppose on 28 June 1991 one can expect the 1988 report. This is totally inadequate because there have been many changes since then. In fact, since the material was made available for the report by the Foyle Fisheries Commission the Minister for the Marine has changed, the Government have changed and members on the commission have changed. That is totally unacceptable to those interested in the future of the Foyle Fisheries.

The commission held a number of meetings which are detailed in this report: on 5-6 March 1987 in Derry, on 30 March and 6 May in Belfast, on 28-29 May and 6-7 July in Derry and on 8 October in Belfast; one meeting was held on 23 November 1987 in Dublin but no meeting was held in County Donegal. There are many people from my county and along the river Foyle, from Lifford to Moville, whose livelihood depend on their fishing activities on the river Foyle.

As far as our Government and Department of the Marine are concerned, there seems to be a lack of interest. I remember very clearly the Minister's response when I raised this matter previously. He indicated that he was satisfied that the civil servants in his Department had written a report which indicated that everything was cosy with the Foyle Fisheries Commission. I do not believe that report is worth anything. I have an interest in the river Finn and under the heading "Angling" the report states in relation to that river that, while not up to the standard of recent years, the spring run of salmon did yield significant catches. Although May was disappointing, catches reported in June were only marginally lower than those in 1986.

It is hard to believe that departmental officials would not report this unacceptable position to the Minister. It is appalling that there is no involvement from the South except by civil servants who met six times outside the State and once in Dublin. I ask the Minister to give me a response I can take to those involved in the fishing industry on the river Foyle and which will make sense and be acceptable to them.

I have a particular reason for raising this. The British and Irish Governments agreed on 21 October 1987 at a meeting of the Anglo-Irish Intergovernmental Conference to initiate a study of the north-west region, County Donegal and the areas covered by the district councils of Derry city and Strabane. That was a very important study after long negotiations by three local authorities. The Taoiseach and the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, Mr. Peter Brooke, launched the North-west study in County Donegal on Saturday, 7 July 1990. That study was carefully examined by many authorities in County Donegal. It was examined by the vocational committee, Teagasc, the Department of the Gaeltacht, the IDA, FÁS and all the public bodies stating they had a contribution to make on the north-west study launched by the Taoiseach and the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland. The reason I mention this is, having carefully examined and made recommendations — seven joint recommendations, two specifically from Strabane Rural District Council, two from Derry City Council and two from Donegal County Council making a total of 13 recommendations arising from the north-west study — the first item on the list is a water quality management plan for Lough Foyle. How inconsistent. If the study was so important — and I believe it was and that it has been taken seriously because it was submitted for consideration to the Interreg Programme of the EC and for other funding programmes to support the development plan — I find it difficult to understand that on the same river the Foyle Fisheries Commission are allowed to manage by default and nothing else.

The serious aspect of this matter is that there are reports of pollution on the river Foyle which I mentioned on a previous occasion but which have not been proven. In fact, recently there was a scare about a national incinerator for waste being located on the Foyle at Maydown, County Derry. There has been widespread concern and many public meetings about the damage that would cause to the Foyle.

Another part of the problem is that there are a number of licensed fishermen who buy the licence at an increased fee every year. I have no quarrel with that but those families who pay for a licence, who go out to fish and expect to make a livelihood are confronted by a very large number of poachers. Some of the people who poach on the river Foyle believe it is the proper thing to do, that it is nationalistic and that they are striking a blow for the country. I could go on at length. The Minister knows right well that I have a very good case to make and a difficult one to answer and I ask him not to defend the people who are involved in the management of the Foyle Fisheries Commission.

I make one request and I intend to press it hard until I get results: will some of the people who are living in County Donegal on the banks of the Foyle who are involved in the fishing of the Foyle be involved in the management structure? I do not think that is an unreasonable request. If one considers the Industrial Credit Board and many other industries, I do not know of one single industry that have not got some of their people actively involved, participating in the management structure or the board of management or commission, or whatever you call it. It is time this matter was put on a proper footing and I am asking the Minister to bring this problem of the river Foyle to the attention of the Government. I live very close to the river Foyle, within one field of it and I can tell you that it is long past time we had proper management structures in place there.

Perhaps the people from the Department of the Marine who are acting on the Foyle Fisheries Commission are very highly qualified, perhaps they have degrees in research and they have studied fishing, pollution and mariculture and so on, but that is not acceptable to representatives of the industry looking at the problems on the ground. I will give the Minister the list of priorities which have been agreed. I will also give him copies of the programme as launched.

An Leas-Chathaoirleach

I would ask the Senator to choose some other place to give the Minister the documentation. I am sure he will be able to give it to him later. It is not appropriate to hand over documentation at this stage.

I hope the Minister will respond favourably in this matter. My motion this evening is timely in so far as we are now starting another year. We had our difficulties last year and an indication by the Government and by the Minister's Department would help to bring about a more regular and orderly approach by the existing structures until we can improve on them. That is my motion and I am asking for the Minister's favourable consideration of the matters I have raised in this regard.

Limerick West): First, I thank Senator McGowan for raising this matter and I welcome his contribution. The reports for the years 1988 and 1989 are completed and are being printed and will be published very shortly. I have every confidence in the personnel from my Department on the Foyle Fisheries Commission and in their ability to do the job. I know from experience that they are doing a very good job indeed.

The Senator raised a question about the north-west study. I want to let him know that the study was discussed at the meeting between the commission and the advisory council as late as November 1990. He raised the question of water quality management plans. Those plans are the responsibility of another Department, the Department of the Environment and, indeed, of local authorities. I will be happy to have the management structure the Senator suggested considered. As the Senator rightly said, this matter was raised in this House on 5 July 1990.

The primary responsibility for the preservation of water quality generally in the portions of the Foyle catchment within our jurisdiction rests with the Donegal County Council exercising their powers and functions under the Local Government (Water Pollution) Acts, 1977 and 1990. As I said then, I have every confidence that the elected members and officials of the council are fully competent to discharge their statutory duties in this regard, having regard to the circumstances obtaining locally.

That said, it has to be recognised that the Foyle Fisheries Commission must have a particular interest in ensuring that water quality in the Foyle is of sufficiently high quality to guarantee the future of fish stocks and that the interests of fishermen who earn a good part of their annual income from salmon fishing are not adversely affected in any way. At this juncture I should point out that most of the commercial salmon fishermen on the Foyle are residents of County Donegal. To enable the commission to discharge their responsibilities in this area, it has available to it the wide powers exercisable by the regional fisheries boards under the Fisheries Acts and the various Water Pollution Acts to which I have already referred.

As a result of the concerns that were raised last year in relation to possible tainting of salmon caught in the Foyle, the commission instituted a comprehensive monitoring programme involving systematic sampling and testing of water, sediments and fish from the Foyle system in close co-operation with officials of the Fisheries Departments, North and South, Donegal County Council and the Northern Ireland Department of the Environment. I am pleased to be able to inform the House that none of the samples tested to date under this programme has revealed the presence of any substance at a level which would give rise to suggestions that fish could be tainted. The monitoring programme is continuing in 1991 and will be intensified if necessary.

I understand that the substance which gave rise to concern about possible tainting in Foyle salmon in earlier years was Geosmin which is an entirely naturally occuring substance which can accumulate in the tissue of fish in particular circumstances in dry years and can give rise to suggestions of an early or muddy taint. This phenomenon has been reported from locations in the USA also.

I am very glad to be able to say that there is no suggestion that there has been any pollution of the Foyle waters by any toxic substances, or, indeed, from effluents released by manufacturing industry. If such should ever prove to be the case, I have no doubt that the commission, Donegal County Council and the Department of the Environment for Northern Ireland, have sufficient powers available to them to take the necessary remedial action, including prosecutions where these are called for.

I mentioned on the last occasion the existence of the Foyle Advisory Council who are a consultative body established under the Foyle Fisheries Act in order to provide a channel of communication between the commission and the various local interest groups in the Foyle area. As set out in the Act the functions of the council are:

to watch over the interests of the holders of fishing licences and the occupiers of fisheries in the Foyle Area, to make such suggestions and representations as it thinks proper to the Commission in relation to any of the Commission's functions, and to advise the Commission upon any matter referred to it by the Commission.

It seems to me that this council who have regular meetings with the commission, are ideally placed to deal with the concerns of local people living and working in the Foyle area in relation to this issue. The council met all four commissioners at the end of last year and I understand that they will be meeting the chief executive of the commission very shortly when this matter of tainting will again be discussed. I have no doubt that the members of the council will be pleased with what they will hear on that occasion in relation to the progress that has been made on this very important issue.

The Seanad adjourned at 10.25 p.m. until 10.30 a.m. on Thursday, 25 April 1991.

Barr
Roinn