The Civil Liability Bill is a Seanad Bill and will be introduced here. I hope the House will rise not later than 12 July.
Senator Henry mentioned restraint at Orange parades, which would be helpful in the coming months. I am sure that message will be sent to everyone. Senator Dardis asked if we should have statements on Northern Ireland. We probably should have a debate because important things need to be said and certain questions must be answered. Most people here doubt Sinn Féin's credibility in terms of what it says and its bona fides. There is also a desire to rise above the difficulties and to continue the peace process. I will try to organise a debate in the near future.
A number of Senators mentioned the farmyard pollution scheme. That matter could be raised on the Adjournment. However, if Senators want a longer debate, we could arrange to discuss it with the fish kills, which were raised by Senator Fitzgerald.
School transport is a specific issue and it would be more appropriate to raise it on the Adjournment, at least in the first instance, given the level of work we have to do between now and the end of the session. If Senator McDonagh repeats his question tomorrow morning I will have information for him on the regional education boards legislation. I said there will be a debate on tourism as well between now and the end of the session.
As regards the question raised by Senator Ormonde and others and the 184 degrees isosceles triangle, I can only speculate that it was a warm day; the triangle probably expanded with the heat. The Minister gave a very full reply last night on the Adjournment in the other House and in light of further information it would be useful to pursue it in that way in this House. Perhaps there could be an Adjournment debate on that as soon as possible.
Senator Lee raised the question of university legislation. My understanding is that the legislation will be published either at the end of this month or early next month and will be taken early next session. I am endeavouring to have it published as Seanad legislation but I do not have a guarantee on that yet. Senator Farrell was on very dangerous ground. Is he saying that because a person is a unionist he is less than fully Irish or that he should be penalised in some way? His intervention was not particularly helpful. It also raises issues which it might not be wise in the current climate to discuss too deeply. His comments were very far from the Wolfe Tone concept of Irishmen embracing all political views. Senator Roche raised the question of a debate on sports and I am open to that.