Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Seanad Éireann díospóireacht -
Tuesday, 25 Apr 2023

Finance Bill 2023: Second Stage

Question proposed: "That the Bill be now read a Second Time."

I appreciate the opportunity to speak on the Bill, which has been passed by the Dáil. The Bill is relatively short and provides for some of the cost-of-living measures announced by the Government in late February. The full package of measures will cost €1.2 billion and will put money back into people's pockets, help with bills and ensure that there is no cliff edge for the temporary measures already in place. The Government has acted repeatedly and on a significant scale to address the cost-of-living challenge we have experienced. Over the past year, Ireland has experienced a broad based surge in inflationary pressures, leading to higher prices for households and businesses alike. The key driver of these pressures has obviously been Russia's illegal war in Ukraine. The Government appreciates the difficulties families face and that is why significant measures, both within and outside the annual budgetary cycle, have been implemented in a real effort to protect households and businesses from the impact of these costs. We are in a position to help mitigate some of these price increases because of the prudent management of the public finances to date. It is important that we take the opportunity to give people support when and where they need it.

I will use my time this afternoon to concentrate on the measures contained in the Bill. A number of these measures are in place with financial resolutions giving them temporary effect having been recently approved by the Dáil. This illustrates the urgency with which Government views them. I will go into that in a bit more detail later. The Bill is very short, consisting of just eight sections. Sections 1 and 2 deal with a temporary change in the benefit-in-kind, BIK, regime for vehicles. Senators raised this matter at any early stage this year, recognising that this change, which was signalled some years ago, was to come into effect at a very difficult inflationary period that was not anticipated at the time this measure was brought in with a lead-in period of three years. Of course, the Government remains committed to the environmental rationale behind the current emissions-based vehicle BIK regime that has been in operation since 1 January 2023. However, in the current inflationary context, the Government recognises the practical difficulty experienced by some people facing BIK increases under the new regime. To that end, and recognising these difficulties, these two sections provide for temporary changes to BIK for the current year, which will help to mitigate some of the increases associated with the new emissions-based calculation. They introduce a relief of €10,000 to be applied to the original market value, OMV, of cars in categories A to D to reduce the amount of benefit-in-kind payable. This is not applicable to cars in category E. The upper limit in the highest mileage band is amended by way of a 4,000 km reduction so that the highest mileage band is now entered into at 48,001 km. These temporary measures will be retrospectively applied from 1 January 2023 and will remain in place until 31 December 2023, providing targeted support for people at a very difficult time without diluting our commitment to the overwhelming environmental rationale behind making sure that all of our motor taxes are emissions-based. We have a very strong focus on the environmental rationale for such a system.

Sections 3 and 6 deal with agricultural tax reliefs. Senators will be aware that a number of agricultural tax reliefs were introduced or extended in Finance Act 2022 but that it was only possible to provide for them to the end of June this year at that time because the revised EU agricultural block exemption regulation had not been agreed. The new regulation came into effect on 1 January 2023.

Section 3 provides for: the extension of farm restructuring capital gains tax relief to 31 December 2025; the extension of young trained farmer stock relief to 31 December 2024; the extension of registered farm partnership stock relief to 31 December 2024; the extension and amendment of the publication requirements of the accelerated capital allowance relief for capital expenditure on slurry storage to 31 December 2025; and the amendment of the publication requirements for the accelerated wear and tear allowances for farm safety equipment.

The amendment of the publication requirements is necessary under the requirements of the revised agricultural block exemption regulation, ABER, that is, the regulation I referred to earlier.

Section 6 deals with two reliefs provided for in the Stamp Duties Consolidation Act 1999. It provides for the extension of the farm consolidation stamp duty relief and the young trained farmer stamp duty relief to 31 December 2025 and for the amendment of the period during which an individual can qualify for this latter relief, after acquiring land, from four years to three years to comply with Article 18(6) of the revised regulation. The sections also provide for transitional arrangements for the coming into effect of those changes.

Section 4 provides for the phased restoration of the rates of excise on petrol, diesel and marked gas oil that will take place in three stages over the coming months, as announced on 21 February. This will see rates restored on 1 June by 6 cent per litre of petrol, 5 cent per litre of diesel and 1 cent per litre of marked gas oil. On 1 September, these rates will increase by a further 7 cent for petrol, 5 cent for diesel and 1 cent for marked gas oil. Rates will then be fully restored on 31 October with a final increase of 8 cent for petrol, 6 cent for diesel and 3 cent for marked gas oil. The extension and phased reintroduction of these excise reductions is estimated to cost €383 million. These changes have already been introduced by a financial resolution and approved by the Dáil.

I note that oil prices have fallen back in recent weeks. I see, and I imagine Senators and anyone watching can see, that prices at the pumps have reduced considerably and are at their lowest level since September 2021. This will mitigate the effect of these increases.

Section 5 deals with VAT changes, some of which were introduced by a financial resolution on 22 February. The section provides for the extension of the 9% rate of VAT on the supply of electricity and gas until 31 October 2023. It also provides for the extension of the 9% rate of VAT on the supply of certain goods and services in the hospitality and tourism sectors until 31 August 2023 and for the continuation of the application of the 0% rate of VAT to the supply of Covid-19 testing kits. Finally, this section provides for the 0% rate of VAT on the supply and installation of solar panels.

At the request of the Minister for the Environment, Climate and Communications, the Minister for Finance, Deputy Michael McGrath, agreed to the 0% rating of VAT for the supply and installation of solar panels for households and private dwellings. I believe the measure is welcome. If passed on to consumers, the Department of Finance estimates it will reduce the average cost for such supply and installation for consumers from €9,000 to €8,000 and will support households in reducing their electricity bills into the future. I encourage the passing on of this reduced VAT rate to households in every situation. A financial resolution to give this amendment legal effect from 1 May 2023 was passed by the Dáil last week. The measure underlines the Government's commitment to helping households to save money on their energy bills, reduce their carbon footprint and contribute positively to our national climate change targets. The estimated cost of that measure to the Exchequer is €19 million annually.

I have already spoken about section 6 with section 3, as both sections deal with agricultural tax reliefs. I will therefore move on to section 7, which deals with the temporary business energy support scheme, TBESS, which was announced in budget 2023. To date, 35,613 claims have been approved under the scheme with a total value of €77.6 million. Revenue is publishing comprehensive information about the scheme on its website. A motion agreed by the Dáil on 22 February approved a number of draft orders. These extend the TBESS to the end of April. The monthly cash cap was increased from €10,000 to €15,000 for a business with a single premises and from €30,000 to €45,000 for a business with multiple premises. These changes took effect from 1 March 2023. The TBESS is provided for in sections 100 and 101 of the Finance Act 2022. However, Section 7 of this Bill will amend section 100 of the Finance Act 2022 to provide that the Minister for Finance may make a ministerial order extending the scheme to a date not later than 31 July 2023. Section 101 of the Finance Act 2022 will also be amended by this Bill. The scheme will be extended to 31 May 2023. It was due to end on 28 February 2023. However, following the exercise of the power contained in section 100 of the Finance Act 2022, the Minister extended the scheme to 30 April 2023, which was the latest date provided for in the legislation.

This further extension to 31 May will help businesses deal with the continuing impact of higher energy costs and the power to extend to 31 July will provide flexibility to further extend the scheme if that is considered appropriate. The energy cost threshold is being reduced. Currently, to be eligible for TBESS, a business must have experienced a 50% increase in the average per unit cost of electricity or natural gas relative to the reference period. This is being reduced to 30%. This change will be applied retrospectively from 1 September, when TBESS commenced. The amount of relief that a business will receive is being increased. A business is currently entitled to a payment equal to 40% of the uplift in its energy costs. From 1 March 2023, this will increase to 50%. Finally, the Bill provides for a new time limit for making claims under the scheme, which will be two months from the end date of the scheme. It had previously been four months from the end of the claim period to which the claim relates, so this gives businesses further time and flexibility in which to make a claim. The intention here is to deliver more money to those businesses that have suffered as a consequence of higher energy prices. Some businesses have suffered more than most. I think in particular of butchers and the threat they had due to having to refrigerate meat during a difficult and warm period and during a warmer winter. It is important we respond with the flexibility businesses need to continue to manage their costs.

As Senators will be aware, the amendments to the TBESS were subject to state aid approval and provision was made for a commencement order to give effect to the amendments when such approval was received. That approval was received and I take this opportunity to encourage businesses to join the more than 28,000 others that have already registered for the scheme. I suggest Senators do likewise with businesses in their areas. Revenue has advised that, with effect from last Monday, 17 April qualifying businesses can submit claims on Revenue’s online service, ROS, for the March and April claim periods, and from this, the week beginning 24 April 2023, it will begin reassessing claims already submitted for the period from 1 September 2022 to 28 February 2023 that did not meet the original 50% energy costs threshold, but now qualify under the 30% threshold. This means it will not be necessary for a business to have to go to the trouble and expense of revising claims already submitted for these periods, as Revenue will do it for them. It will notify applicants once reassessment has taken place. Thus, we are trying to make it as easy and practical as possible for businesses around the country that have submitted claims to get more money to support them without having to go to the trouble of having to make a new claim.

The final section of the Bill is the standard one dealing with the Short Title.

As I said, this is a short but important Finance Bill. I look forward to constructive discussion in the House and to hearing the views of Senators. The Bill provides for a number of targeted tax changes and specific measures to support families and businesses and I commend it to the House.

I thank the Minister of State and welcome the transition year students from Cnoc Mhuire Secondary School in Granard, County Longford. They are Oisín, Caoimhe and Rían and they are accompanied by their teacher, Mr. Farrell. They are guests of Senator Carrigy. They are welcome to the Seanad and I hope they enjoy their visit to Leinster House.

I call Senator Maria Byrne.

I thank the Minister of State for coming in to discuss this all-important Bill. The first item I wish to highlight in it is the BIK adjustments. People working for a company may have a car in the company's ownership and, therefore, I welcome that a further €10,000 is allocated under the Bill, especially for categories A to D. This is positive for encouraging people to change their vehicles and go electric. Many changes have been made, but we need to encourage people to continue to make that change as much as possible. The fact it will be backdated to January 2023 is most welcome.

I refer to the extension of the agri-tax reliefs. Many of them are in place already, including the young trained farmer relief, farm consolidation relief, farm restructuring relief, young trained farmer stock relief, registered farm partnership stock relief and the accelerated capital allowance relief for capital expenditure on slurry storage.

It is my understanding that it will be phased out in 2024 and 2025. As the revised regulation came in in January 2023, it is positive that it will be in place for a substantial time because so many farms are being handed over to the next generation. It is important to put these benefits in place to encourage and make sure that farms continue to be farmed because it is part of our culture. All our families were farmers or from a farming background at some stage or other. This is most welcome. The conditions are contained in the Bill.

I welcome the extension of the 9% VAT rate on electricity and gas. More vulnerable and older people are receiving the €200 cost-of-living payment this Friday. That will help with their electricity and gas costs, along with the VAT rate being kept down until the end of October 2023. I am still concerned however especially for the more vulnerable people. For example, an older lady I met lately received a gas bill for €700. The lady lives on her own in a one-bedroom house with a sitting-room-cum-kitchen. This is huge money. When I made pleas to the utility company on her behalf, it eventually agreed to give her a refund because there had to be something wrong, even though the company checked the meter and looked at everything. For a person living on her own, on a basic social welfare pension, a bill for €700 is a huge amount.

In the context of tourism and hospitality, the fact the 9% VAT rate has been extended up to the end of August has helped to keep many businesses afloat. With the Minister of State, Deputy Richmond, I met the representatives of 38 businesses in Limerick yesterday all of which were from different backgrounds and different spheres. They varied from a shoe shop to a bookseller to publicans. We met with a number of businesspeople from the hotel and hospitality sector who were grateful that the 9% VAT rate has been kept in place and that it is going to be extended. The businesses mentioned were butchers but I believe the hospitality industry would feed into that. They were greatly affected by Covid-19. It is important that this is being retained.

With regard to businesses and TBESS, the business owners we met yesterday were grateful for the scheme. Many applied who did not believe they would qualify or were told they would not qualify. The reduction in the threshold to 30% to be eligible for the scheme is to be reviewed. It is important to get a clear message out that those people do not need to reapply. However, we also need to get the message out to people who did not apply because they thought they would not qualify. It has to be a balancing act. The Minister and the Government listened at the time and said the way it was set up initially was prohibitive for businesses. Some people found it daunting and had to employ their accountants to fill out the forms because they were so complicated. They now do not need to apply for the reduction in the energy costs threshold from 50% to 30%. I want a clear message to go out about the zero VAT for antigen tests and solar panels. From speaking to many people, along with the Minister of State, in one month recently a credit union arranged €2.6 million in loans for green energy. This shows that people are taking green energy seriously. This reduction to zero VAT on solar panels is important.

Some people were talking about the fact that VAT was making the solar panels that bit more expensive. We have to bring in ways of encouraging people to make that change and take green energy seriously. The Government has gone a long way to listening to domestic energy users, businesspeople and farmers. That is very important and is what drives the thrust of the changes in this Bill but I wish to highlight petrol and diesel costs. While they are down to relatively low levels, I still passed two petrol stations today between which there was a difference of 10 cent per litre. They were not too far away from one another. That is a considerable difference. I cannot understand how one of them can sell fuel at the lower price and other has not passed on that reduction. It needs to be monitored. We cannot tar everybody with the one brush, but such a difference is completely wrong and I wish to highlight it. Other than that, I thank the Minister of State and I look forward to supporting the Bill.

I welcome the Minister of State. Obviously this legislation is primarily to confirm, in statutory form, what has been agreed by Dáil Éireann in financial resolutions and, therefore, there is very little we can do or say about it, except to say that these measures are generally intended to mitigate and alleviate some of the particular hardships being endured by business, consumers and farmers, arising out of the financial disturbances we are currently experiencing.

I will say a couple of things about the overall financial position. We have got to the position that we are running very substantial budgetary surpluses based, in large measure on increased receipts of corporation tax. I see many newspaper articles saying this is artificial and should not be relied on in the long term. It could be a short-term phenomenon in that it might, in the coming years, dissipate to some extent due to international conditions. However, I have not heard anybody who has been sceptical about the fact that these moneys are coming in suggesting that we should not have them. I have not heard anybody who is critical, on some kind of quasi-guilty conscience basis, of Ireland's success in attracting foreign direct investment to this country, saying it is a bad thing and we would be better off without it. Maybe People Before Profit or some group like that would be of that view but, in general terms, most balanced middle-of-the-road people would take the view it is a good thing that we have this surplus. The question is what we do with this.

Inflation is high at present and we hope the rate is reducing. We cannot be oblivious to the effect of increased public expenditure in an already slightly overheated market, if these moneys were to be spent on current expenditure. It raises the question as to what we should with these surplus tax receipts. It occurred to me that one could put them away and perhaps they should be put away in a rainy day fund. Others have suggested we should apply them to the reduction of indebtedness, simply by paying off national debt, which is at €224 billion at this stage.

One of the reflections I have had is that the high rate of inflation in Europe, the sterling area and the United States means that, in effect, the real value of our national indebtedness will reduce.

This is because the currency in which it is denominated is devaluing, and inflation is, in effect, a stealth tax of its own.

However, if we are to expend any of those funds, they should be spent on projects that are worthwhile and of long-term capital value. There are so many possibilities for such capital projects available to us at the moment, that I would urge the Government to do two things. The first thing is to face up to a fact that, I think, the Minister, Deputy Eamon Ryan, has at last acknowledged, namely, that it is one thing to announce a policy and it is an entirely different thing to get the policy to come into effect. I refer to offshore wind generation, the amount of expenditure that is going to have to be put into national electricity grids, port services for offshore wind energy development and issues like that. There is a clear case for a careful application of the moneys we have on worthwhile projects.

I want to make a couple of points. In this capital city, we are now about to embark on two projects, one of which is to dig a tunnel from Dublin Airport to near where I live in Ranelagh. It started off with a price tag of around €3 billion. I wrote an article in The Irish Times saying that it would probably end up at €4.5 billion. I now see that it is somewhere between €15 billion and €20 billion, and rising I am sure.

We should have asked ourselves, somebody should have asked the citizens of Dublin, and there should have been some public debate as to whether all of that money would have been better spent on a very light rail, Luas-type system, covering far more of the Dublin metropolitan area. I am talking about Dún Laoghaire, for example, and all the suburbs that are, at the moment, dependent on different means of getting about but chiefly by private cars.

Another thing I wanted to say in that context is that we are about to spend a vast sum of money on BusConnects. I do not know how much we are going to spend on it, but I have been looking at the recently-announced Transport for Ireland website, and the amount of actual infrastructural work that is going to be carried out on the roads is huge. I am unhappy that this represents good value for money. We have allowed the engineers out there with their toy bus sets and toy train sets and we could have done far better.

Having said all that, I re-emphasise my view that we need two things from this Government, namely, value for money on capital expenditure and the capacity to deliver on capital projects. Somebody said to me recently that the Irish Free State Government established in 1922 managed to build Ardnacrusha at a time when this country was on its knees in the period after the Civil War. They added that if this project was put forward now, by the time we got over the environmental arguments and went to the Four Courts, backwards and forwards, we would still be at the planning stage.

There is an absolute imperative on the Government to get its act together on the delivery of capital projects. It is not just good enough to say that it will put aside €200 million for this, or €100 million for that. That is not the way to do it. For instance, I notice that more funding is going to be made available to local authorities to refurbish derelict and run-down housing. If one went into any local authority and put that money in a suitcase in front of the county chief executive and said, "Here is your money", what is he or she to do with that money, if that authority does not have the officers, the architects or the people who can work out value for money?

Simply announcing something in Dublin does not mean a derelict cottage in County Clare will be actually approved for an improvement grant by the local authority. We must face up to the fact that there is a huge difference between delivery on one hand and announcing funding on the other.

I welcome the Minister of State to the House. We must first compliment the Government on its management of the economy. This was noted when the 2023 budget was announced in September 2022. The Government clearly stated that if another intervention were needed, it would be in a position to so do concerning the cost-of-living crisis. This is exactly what we are doing today. We are legislating for this intervention of €1.2 billion. This will have a direct impact on families. I think more than €410 million was allocated directly to measures affecting the day-to-day lives of those families who are most vulnerable in our society. An additional €60 million was allocated to the education process, and more specifically around providing transport and reducing fees for the junior and leaving certificate examinations. This intervention was targeted mostly at families and at the most vulnerable families in our society. Everybody in the House must acknowledge this and that the Government put us in a position to be able to do it.

Senator Maria Byrne has mentioned almost everything, so we will not go back over that ground. Regarding the business aspect, however, I wish to reflect on this area. Just in case the people from The Ditch website are listening in, I do have an interest in the hospitality industry. I wish to make this point clear. The support provided to businesses throughout the Covid-19 pandemic was unprecedented and has kept a significant number of family businesses alive and in a position to continue. I must acknowledge this point. Turning to the hospitality and tourism industry and the ongoing debate concerning the VAT rate, and the current temporary reduction in the VAT rate seems to have spent more time at this level than at the 13.5% in recent years, what is needed is a wider debate. Several Senators from all parties in the House have called for such a debate on this sector and what is the correct VAT rate for the tourism industry to be in.

We have two rates at present, depending on whether we are talking about accommodation, food or alcohol or the types of activities being undertaken. Hiring a conference room attracts a higher rate than staying in accommodation. I refer to the impact on other activities in the hospitality area as well. We need to have an open discussion around this issue of VAT in the hospitality industry. Looking at the construction industry, companies operating in that area are charged a VAT rate of 23% on products coming into the country. Having worked on those products and delivered a service, be that building a house or something else, however, means that a VAT rate of only 13.5% will be charged. To a certain extent, the hospitality industry does the same thing. It takes in certain products at a VAT rate of 23%, but it is then charged the same rate on what it produces from them. This is the case, even though there is a significant labour input during that process, similar to what happens in the construction industry. I would appreciate, therefore, having a wider debate on this issue, and several of us in the House have called for this to happen.

Moving to the TBESS, it is great to see the changes made in it. One thing I highlighted to my colleague, the Minister for Finance, Deputy Michael McGrath, and this was referred to already, related to natural gas and electricity. In fairness to anybody running a business in a rural area, it will not be on natural gas. There is a certain discrimination around this issue. Businesses operating using liquefied petroleum gas, LPG, do not qualify for this scheme but they are faced with the same price increases. It may be that a scheme of this kind is being worked out at present. Hopefully, this is happening because it is not fair that businesses in this situation are being penalised for using LPG as a source of energy.

I thank the Minister of State for coming in today. I support this budget. As I have said, the Government has acted very responsibly. We clearly put it on the record last year that we would intervene again. We were in a position to intervene, and that is critical.

On the point made by Senator McDowell about the money we have at the moment, I agree that we would all like to see the money spent wisely. The economy is very heated at the moment. The last thing we want is to throw more money into the economy because that will overheat it. Therefore, it is critical that we find the right projects or things for the funding we have to finance into the future.

Cuirim fáilte roimh an Aire Stáit. Is deas í a fheiceáil anseo. This Bill is positive. Anytime we put money into people's pockets and reduce costs, it is always welcome.

My colleague, Senator Casey, has mentioned LPG and that issue is relevant to me as well. People who live in rural areas do not tap into using natural gas. I did not even know that one could get natural gas until I saw an advertisement on television indicating that it is a thing in big urban areas. LPG is something to think about, as is having a VAT reduction.

I come from north County Clare, where tourism is massive, and I consider it to be the best place in Ireland. Therefore, extending the application of the 9% VAT rate until the end of August is welcome.

Many small business owners and operators are very worried about tourism because this is a shaky time. The cost of wages, food and packaging and the resources needed to run a business have all increased. I would love to see a long-term extension of the current VAT rate because many people continually worry that the Government will put the rate back up to 13.5% and then these business will have to close. Maybe we cannot say that the rate will remain at 9% forever but we can confirm whether the rate will return to 13.5% and how long the current rate will last. People always worry when the VAT rate will be increased so it is good that the 9% rate will be retained for this summer.

I welcome the extension of the TBESS. As much as 70% of all the jobs in County Clare stem from small businesses, which is probably true for most rural counties in Ireland. Rural areas rely much more on small businesses than on the multinationals, which employ a lot of people in Dublin and other places. The scheme is massive and its extension is welcome.

The Bill extends several measures under the targeted agricultural modernisation scheme, TAMS. It introduces a new accelerated capital allowance relief for expenditure on slurry storage. Such provision is massive because there are huge issues with slurry storage in rural Ireland. When quotas ceased, cattle numbers increased. It is great that dairy farmers have done well out of that but there are huge issues with slurry storage. We need to deal with the issue because if it is not dealt with, problems will arise. Some of that slurry has ended up in places where it should not be. It is hard for farmers because they literally do not have enough space to store slurry. We are nearly forcing them to do things that they do not want to do. In saying that, I am not defending them. It is not right for anyone to do something wrong but we need to resolve the issue. Blaming people will not solve the problem but finding solutions will do so.

The young trained farmer stamp duty relief is really good. I often meet representatives of Macra na Feirme who have a lot of concerns about the future of farming for young people, so the stamp duty relief is good. I welcome the farm consolidation relief, the extension of farm restructuring relief and the registered farm partnership stock relief. I often meet farmers and officials from the Irish Farmers Association, IFA. I listen to them a lot so I know that these schemes are welcome. I also welcome the capital allowance relief for slurry storage and believe it should be extended for as long as possible.

Finally, I wish to mention VAT on solar panels because I have had some personal involvement with the issue. Last Thursday night, I held an event in an hotel in Ennis, County Clare which was attended by 150 people. Due to being oversubscribed, 100 people had to be turned away. It was an information seminar on solar power at which installers and representatives of the Clare Community Energy Agency facilitated a question-and-answer session about domestic solar power generation and solar power for farmers. Even though the event was held in the county town, the majority of people who attended were farmers. Solar power generation is brilliant but we need to do better and do more to inform people as to how energy generation can be done because it is quite daunting to figure out whom to trust. A lot of people are coming on board now saying that they can install or sell photovoltaics but the Government is missing a piece by not ensuring any information is really clear. The Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland, SEAI, is doing good work but somebody needs to organise things further. I organised the event in Ennis but we really need to get information out because people want to know what they can do. To get rid of the 13.5% VAT rate is a massive win by the Minister, Deputy Eamon Ryan, in terms of getting the initiative through the Cabinet and into this Finance Bill.

The first thing I did when I came in as a Senator was to introduce the Bill on removing the need for planning permission for the installation of solar panels, on which we have also received support from the Government. You do not need planning to put up solar panels anymore and there is no longer a limitation on the number of solar panels you can put up. There is a grant of €2,400 for domestic solar panels and of up to €60,000 for farmers to put up solar panels, and now VAT on solar panels is gone as well. This is a huge thing. So many people who have received the grant feel so good and empowered to own and create some of their energy themselves. We want to empower people to be more involved so that not all of their money is going out the door in bills to big multinationals that are making huge profits.

I welcome that VAT abolition, which is fantastic, but there is work to be done by the Government, local government, the SEAI and everybody. I will be running another three workshops on it in County Clare but there are lots of things that can be done. There are community workers in the SEAI as well and we need to get the information out there to make it clear for people and to help them to empower themselves to take advantage of all of these brilliant wins we have had like the VAT abolition on solar panels.

Senator McDowell has left but he reminded me that the capital development plans in respect of the national cultural institutions also seem to be moving at a snail's pace. There must be some delays in securing sanctions from the Department of Tourism, Culture, Arts, Gaeltacht, Sport and Media. The National Concert Hall, the Abbey Theatre and the National Library of Ireland are all waiting for movement. The Crawford Art Gallery is one of the sites that is under way but everywhere else seems to be waiting for approval to get to the next stage while the costs go up. I will probably put some parliamentary questions in to the Minister, Deputy Catherine Martin, on that.

I welcome the Minister of State to the House. While there are many aspects to the Bill that Sinn Féin welcomes, we are concerned that it is once again insufficient and that what speak loudest in this Bill are its omissions and its failure to provide meaningful support for workers and families that continue to face extortionate electricity bills. What also speaks loudly in the Bill is the decision, despite the repeated calls that have been made in the past six months, as Senator Casey mentioned, to refuse to provide an energy supports scheme for those businesses that rely on oil and liquefied petroleum gas.

Perhaps most frustrating is the Government's refusal, even as mortgage costs rise sharply, to introduce targeted and temporary mortgage interest relief. Last week the European Central Bank lending rate increased for the sixth time since July and that rate hike will impact more than 250,000 Irish homeowners immediately. These are homeowners who have already seen their mortgage repayments steadily increase since last summer. Irish mortgage holders were already paying the highest interest rates in Europe, 50% higher than the European average. In December, the average interest rate in Ireland was 2.88%, compared with 1.89% in Europe. It will also hit the pockets of tens of thousands of borrowers who have had their mortgages sold off to vulture funds. These mortgage holders are effectively trapped with nowhere to turn. They have no option to fix their rates or switch and despite repeated assurances from Government Ministers and the Taoiseach that they would be no worse off if their mortgages were sold to vulture funds, they are undoubtedly worse off as so many are set to pay thousands of euro more in interest costs alone this year.

The solutions are there and Sinn Féin has proposed the introduction of mortgage interest relief to absorb 30% of the increased interest cost for struggling borrowers, which would be temporary and would run until the end of the year. This would also be targeted, absorbing a portion of the increased costs since interest rates began to climb. The Government has rejected this proposal out of hand but it is refusing to provide any relief whatsoever for those struggling to afford the mortgage on their family home.

The exclusions from this finance Bill mean it raises as many questions as answers. Sinn Féin will continue to work constructively with the Government on this Bill in the next Stage in this House and we will bring forward solutions. I look forward to scrutinising the Bill in further detail on Committee Stage, where we will be submitting amendments.

I welcome the Minister of State. I welcome the extension of the agricultural tax relief, as outlined in the Finance Bill 2023, particularly the young trained farmers stock relief. It is particularly notable that Macra na Feirme members are walking from Athy in County Kildare to Dublin today and are scheduled to arrive later this evening.

It is a 79 km walk in recognition of its 79 years in existence. I certainly welcome the impact of the Finance Bill 2023 on young farmers who represent the future and the lifeblood of our country and our agricultural sector. In that vein, I know there has been considerable interest in solar panels. I certainly welcome the reduction to zero in the VAT on the supply and installation of solar panels for private dwellings - agricultural buildings were dealt with previously. The zero-rate of VAT will apply to ancillary equipment supplied and installed with the solar panels. That change took place in association with the change to planning permission and will certainly benefit the introduction of this.

The temporary business energy support scheme has been a major initiative which did not see as significant an uptake as was anticipated by Department of Finance officials. I welcome the extension of the scheme until 31 May with flexibility to further extend it until 31 July. The threshold for qualification will be reduced from the 50% increase in electricity or gas costs to 30% and from 31 March the level of relief has increased from 40% to 50% of eligible costs which is also welcome.

The extension of the reduction in the mineral oil excise duty will expire. It is important to note that the wholesale prices are reducing and the cost at the pumps is reducing. I certainly hope this will not result in a noticeable increase in fuel costs because clearly when the illegal invasion of Ukraine started, this had an impact on wholesale oil prices which was very quickly seen at the pumps. We do not see the reduction taking place as quickly as one would like, notwithstanding that prices are at their lowest since 2021.

The extension of the 9% VAT rate for hospitality and tourism was a big initiative of the Fine Gael-led Government in 2011 in the budget for jobs that year to try to increase jobs in the tourism and hospitality sectors. We were in a different situation then with high levels of unemployment. It was a successful initiative. We have had various interactions in the meantime over the suspension and reintroduction of that 9% rate. I welcome the extension until 31 August. I certainly hope the benefits of that continue to be passed on to customers over the coming months.

As has been said here on numerous occasions over the past week, the buoyant economic figures and the buoyant tax receipts are there to be seen. While some of those maybe windfall and temporary, it is clear the finances are in good order. I hope the upcoming budget recognises that with a reduction in the tax burden on hard-pressed taxpayers whether that be a reduction in the USC or increasing the threshold at which people pay the higher rate of tax. That was brought to €40,000 on the last occasion. As I have said previously, if nothing was done with thresholds, everyone would eventually end up paying the higher rate. It is important they keep pace with growth in wages.

I certainly hope this can be looked at and that we can see a measurable increase in the threshold or a further reduction of USC which, as we know, was the temporary tax. It grates with people that it continues to be levied. I know that is for good reason and it brings in a lot of money, which is obviously important for our finances. I would welcome any measures to reduce the USC take or increase the threshold at which people start paying the higher rate of tax or other tax changes that can put money back in people's pockets. While the one-off measures are very welcome, we can reduce the overall burden for people.

I thank all Senators for contributing. I will start with Senator Kyne's contribution on the overall tax burden. I completely agree with what he and Senator Garvey said about putting money back in people's pockets. The approach of this Government has been to extend the bands.

That is a cost of living measure in itself, supporting families and supporting individuals who have earned money to keep more of that money. Indeed, Senator Warfield talked of mortgage interest relief but perhaps rejects the idea of tax changes, which enable people in the same circumstances to have more money back in their homes at the end of the day. I hope he and his party will support similar extensions to the bands in order that people can have more money on a weekly and monthly basis.

I want to address some of the issues that have been raised by Senators, in particular the point on LPG, which was raised by Senators Casey, Garvey and others. The Senators are right to raise it and it has been raised a number of times over what has been a more difficult winter than others. The Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment, Deputy Coveney, is looking at options for providing assistance to those businesses and will revert to the Government with proposals. The reason it is not being done through this mechanism is that it simply is not possible for Revenue to monitor the usage of oil and LPG in the same way as electricity and metered gas. That does not mean that those people who are using LPG should not have the same benefit as people who are using electricity and gas so, as a consequence, the Minister, Deputy Coveney, is determining a scheme to try to provide support to people.

In regard to VAT on hospitality, it was important that businesses were supported through this period to the end of August. The Minister, the Department and I have stated clearly that this is the final extension of the 9% rate. It has been a temporary measure since it was first introduced in 2011, so it has seemed permanent despite one interruption, but this is the final extension in that form. I recognise the Senators’ calls to look holistically at hospitality and how those matters are considered and calculated.

With regard to TBESS, it is fair to say that when this was brought in, we anticipated very high energy prices, which did not necessarily come to pass in the way we anticipated because of a milder than usual winter, which is important. It is also fair to say that the scheme saw a lower level of uptake than initially would have been expected. I certainly was here, highlighting the figures in different counties and encouraging businesses to sign up, so what was wrong with the scheme that people did not take it up or that meant it was not getting the money out? It is always important to look at the implementation of such schemes. It only opened for claims in early December and I think that, given the timeframe of the scheme, businesses may have been waiting for bills, depending on their billing cycles with their suppliers, which is an important consideration. I also believe that thresholds have to be looked at again to make it easier and more attractive. It is very important that Revenue is going to do this work for businesses, rather than businesses having to do it a second time. It is certainly my view that any time the State and its entities can lean in to the citizen, can lean in to people rather than making it inconvenient for people, and do anything to maximise convenience, that is a good thing. I hope businesses will see recalculations and reassessments done for them, and that they will see the benefit of that in terms of moneys being transferred to them in the coming weeks and months, which is very important.

Senators Garvey, Kyne and others highlighted the change in VAT on solar panels. This is highly significant because it is yet another effort to try to help households and businesses, farmers in particular, to be able to invest in solar power and to be able to get that. There are also issues about connecting to the grid, particularly for farmers around the country, and that needs to be resolved.

I want to highlight the role that credit unions can play to try to support people managing the complex process of applying for a grant and perhaps for financing, whether it is bridging financing or additional financing. I want in particular to highlight the work done as a community in Loughrea, where the Naomh Breandan Credit Union has worked with the community to set up an energy area, analysing the needs of the community and conceiving it in a very thoughtful, integrated way, with the credit union in partnership, supporting people as they look for loans at different stages to try to build out their solar capacity. I hope this VAT reduction will be of assistance but that it will also help to counter any increase in prices arising from supply chain issues and from the broader inflationary environment. I believe that is a very important part of this Bill.

Senator McDowell raised the broader macroeconomic and fiscal position and highlighted the necessity of considering what to do with a budget surplus. It is a very interesting and important time. Anytime that a government is running a budget surplus is a good time but the question that arises, naturally, is how best we can use that money. What is the most prudent and intelligent way that we can use it? We have a significant national debt and while it has been very well financed by the NTMA, it is still the second highest in the EU. What we have learned from the crash is that we do not want to be an outlier. We do not want to be out on the edges of Europe in respect of our financial position. We were very careful during Covid to make sure that the extra financing that we took on, on behalf of the State, kept us among our comparators, the group within the eurozone that we wanted to be in, and did not leave us a massive outliers. However, where we differ is with regard to our national debt. At €226 billion, or €44,000 per person, it is a source of vulnerability and it is something that we need to be conscious of. Nevertheless, it is well financed by the NTMA at very low cost and it has been well managed. We must consider carefully how we use this money, which we believe is a temporary windfall. We have a pensions issue and a national debt issue going forward.

Senators also spoke about the importance of managing a "hot" economy. They referred to the inflationary environment, the need to put money back into people's pockets and the need to make intelligent capital investment. We have tried to strike that balance very carefully and thoughtfully to date but we must continue to be held to account on that by Senators. It is up to Members of this House to keep our feet to the fire and make sure we are making the right decisions and striking the right balance at all times so that we do not walk ourselves back into the difficulties of the past.

Question put and agreed to.

When is it proposed to take Committee Stage?

Committee Stage ordered for Tuesday, 2 May 2023.
Cuireadh an Seanad ar fionraí ar 3.58 p.m. agus cuireadh tús leis arís ar 5 p.m.
Sitting suspended at 3.58 p.m. and resumed at 5 p.m.
Barr
Roinn