asked the Minister for Health if he will state (i) whether the post of gate attendant at the Criminal Asylum, Dundrum, was recently filled by him; (ii) whether the position is an established one; (iii) the number of applicants for the post together with the names and qualifications of the unsuccessful applicants, their present grade or rank in the service and their respective periods of service; (iv) the name, address and qualifications of the successful applicant; (v) whether the method of appointment was by selection board or otherwise, and (vi) whether any protest has been made by Cumann na bhFreastalaidhthe or on behalf of the Civil Service Alliance against the appointment and the method adopted in filling it in this case.
Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Position of Gate Attendant at Dundrum Asylum.
A candidate was recently selected to fill the vacant post of gate attendant at Dundrum Asylum. The post is not specifically designated as an established post and may appropriately be filled by either an established or an unestablished attendant. There were eight applicants, but I do not think it would be desirable nor would it accord with general practice were I to supply the particulars requested by the Deputy in regard to any of these applicants. I can assure the Deputy, however, that in the selection of the person for appointment as gate attendant the fullest consideration was given to the qualifications, experience and general suitability for the post of all the applicants. The appointment was made on the unanimous recommendation of a selection committee consisting of senior officials of the institution. Representations were made by the association of Dundrum Asylum attendants in regard to the filling of the post but I am fully satisfied that the selection for appointment has been on a fair and equitable basis and has provided the best qualified and most suitable candidate for the position.
The Minister has stated that the post is not specifically an established one. Has it been regarded as an established post heretofore? Was it vacated by an established officer?
In reply to the Deputy's question, I pointed out that the post is not specifically designated as an established post and it may be appropriately filled by either an established or an unestablished attendant. That regulation has not been changed.
The supplementary question which I put to the Minister and to which I would like to have a reply is unambiguous and specific. Has the post heretofore been filled by an established officer?
I am not aware of the credentials or qualifications of the previous officers filling this post.
I have asked the Minister to state the number of applicants for the post. He has given that information. I also asked him to state the names and qualifications of the unsuccessful applicants and their respective periods of service. I press the Minister to give me that reply. I am entitled to have a reply unless the Minister has something to conceal.
I have, of course, nothing to conceal. The Deputy is well aware of that. I pointed out in the answer to the question that it is not in accordance with the usual practice observed by the Deputy during his time in office to give the information he has now requested. If, however, the Deputy insists the information will be made available to him.
That is satisfactory.