Is comhartha maith é go bhfuil breis airgid á chur ar fáil ag an Aire chun na tithe so Ghaeltacht do mhéadú agus chun iad do d'fheabhsú. Tá súil agam go rachaidh an caiteachas seo i méid leis na blianta.
It is a very heartening thought and a heartening fact that the amount of moneys being expended under the Gaeltacht Housing Acts has been increased in the past year. It is very significant that the Minister, having budgeted for an expenditure of £80,000, now has to come and ask the House to sanction expenditure in the current year of £100,000. For many years past we have been listening to olagóns about conditions in the Gaeltacht but at last we can see here a ray of hope that there has been some stimulus given to the people living in the Gaeltacht to help to improve their housing conditions. The Minister has acknowledged the fact that the 1953 Gaeltacht Housing (Amendment) Act has contributed its share to this increase in expenditure, and when the Act was being put through this House in the form of a Bill the Minister, I think, readily acknowledged that it would have this effect.
The position about Gaeltacht Housing is rather a difficult one and it has some very big snags that the Minister did not advert to in introducing this Supplementary Estimate. I do not think he was called upon to do so but nevertheless when that last Bill was going through the House much comment was made on some alleged defects in the existing code. The main comment was that in order to qualify for a grant under the Gaeltacht Housing Act one must already have a house, a house that would be replaced by a new house. It was urged on both sides of the House on that occasion that that obligation should no longer be persisted in, that it would tend towards the better population of the Gaeltacht areas. On the other hand, the official attitude had to be pointed out, that the giving of the benefit of Gaeltacht housing grants to people who did not already have a house would tend to accentuate the congestion problem that undoubtedly exists in Gaeltacht areas.
In introducing that Bill I admitted as candidly as I could that at that stage I could not make up my mind whether that obligation should be removed or not. But having regard to the fact that, in some areas at least, increased employment might be given by new industrial activities, little though they might be, perhaps when such a time comes there would be no further need for the obligation of being the owner of an existing house in order to qualify to receive a Gaeltacht housing grant to build a new one. I do not know whether the problem has become more acute in the past two years or not, but, if it has, I am sure the Minister will readily face up to the problem of discharging this obligation and permitting people who would otherwise qualify for a grant under the Gaeltacht Housing Acts to receive a grant even though they were not the occupiers of a house already.
There is, possibly, at the present time rather an anomaly in that the scheduled areas under the Gaeltacht Housing Acts embrace counties as far removed from the Fíor-Ghaeltacht as Louth and Cavan. These people, under existing legislation, can qualify for the extra benefits that are given under the Gaeltacht Housing Acts provided only that the inspectors are satisfied that Irish is the normal spoken language in the household. The ordinary Housing Act grants are attractive enough for people who are living in areas far removed from the Gaeltacht to encourage them either to reconstruct their existing houses where they need reconstruction or to build new ones and all the money that is being provided in this Estimate and that will be provided in subsequent years by this House on the Estimates for this service should be canalised as much as possible to the Fíor-Ghaeltacht areas in the West.
Perhaps that canalisation of itself will not facilitate to a very large extent the building of more houses or the reconstruction of more houses in the Gaeltacht areas, but I feel the time has come when the area of administration, so to speak, of these Acts should be recast so as to ensure that the maximum benefit will be given to the areas for which they were originally designed, that is, Gaeltacht areas and to the houses in these areas in which the Irish language is spoken as the ordinary daily language.
These are the two main bones of contention, when one comes to speak of Gaeltacht Acts, but it is particularly gratifying that some of the provisions that were introduced in the 1953 Amendment Bill, such as the grants for the provision of piped water and the grants for the provision of extra accommodation for visitors in Gaeltacht areas, have been availed of to a large extent. It was one of the problems that I saw when I had responsibility for Gaeltacht areas in inducing young people from city and urban areas to spend their holidays in the Gaeltacht for the purpose of learning the language that accommodation was often very limited and some of the limited accommodation was not up to the standard one would desire. I hope the progress that has been made in this aspect, first in providing extra accommodation for young people going to the Gaeltacht to learn the language and, secondly, in the installation of water systems in Gaeltacht houses will be maintained and continued and that the holiday in the Gaeltacht, apart from achieving its fundamental objective of promoting the language, will also have the effect of encouraging these people to return and enjoy further holidays in the same surroundings and atmosphere.
It is of doubtful value if young people, having gone one year, as a result of receiving a scholarship from a vocational committee or county board of the G.A.A. and spending a month or so in the Gaeltacht for the purpose of learning the language and having enjoyed a good time, forget not only the fact that they had the holiday but also the language as it was spoken in the Gaeltacht areas.
If this amendment has the effect of encouraging more young people and facilitating more young people to go to the Gaeltacht areas to learn the language and to repeat their visits in adolescence, and perhaps adult years, it will have served a more than useful purpose and will have realised its objective possibly far in excess of what was conceived.
I am very glad that the Minister has had occasion to come to the House to ask for £20,000 extra expenditure for the current year and, having regard to this experience, that the provision he will have to make in future years will be ever-increasing.
I compliment the Minister and his officials on the progress that has been made in the acceleration of improvements in the Gaeltacht housing sphere and I trust that that acceleration will continue until such time as we can be satisfied that people who live in the Gaeltacht and speak our own language there will have as good living accommodation as is being provided in the larger towns and cities.