Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Thursday, 24 Nov 1960

Vol. 185 No. 2

Private Members' Business (Resumed). - Adjournment Debate: Horse Meat Factories.

I want to refer to the subject matter of Questions Nos. 15 to 20 on today's Order Paper which deal with the export of horse meat from this country. I should like to say that, as I understand it, early this year, there was a campaign, which achieved considerable publicity, to demonstrate that our arrangements for the export of live horses to the Continent were cruel and inhuman. This country and those who engage in that business were held up to a good deal of public odium. The Government acted very properly at the time. They instituted a thorough investigation into the charges and the general methods of carrying horses and later reported that every precaution was taken to ensure that the animals did not suffer any ill-treatment or cruelty.

That report was supported by two British organisations interested in the welfare of animals: the Blue Cross Society and the Dumb Friends League. Subsequently, it was pretty well demonstrated that the hysteria responsible for the campaign was largely based on false information, or that it was deliberately intended to mislead the public as to the actual and true position. It could appear from the Government's recent announcement that the strictures and criticisms of people on the other side of the Channel and, to a certain extent in this country, had some justification if the Government are now to reverse their findings and their views of last January and February and to restrict, totally or almost totally, the export of live horses to the Continent and elsewhere. That is one aspect of the matter.

Secondly, there is the aspect of the existing factories which have been set up, at some considerable expense, to process, to a limited extent, at economic prices the available supplies of horses. The Minister is aware that there has been considerable difficulty in finding markets for the various parts of the carcases in England and on the Continent because the various rules and regulations which are sometimes altered very rapidly do not make the search for markets very easy. However, the fact is that the Department held up for a considerable time —I think I am correct in saying for almost a year—the export of forequarters to England where there was an existing market.

There are two factories, one of which was established with the assistance of funds raised by a voluntary committee and the other by a group of businessmen with their own capital. I think I am correct in saying they have been processing something between 80 and 100 horses per week. To my knowledge, neither of these factories was consulted in regard to-this new development, nor were any interests representing the farming community, who are vitally interested in this new development, consulted.

The Minister was cautious enough this afternoon at Question Time not to hazard an opinion as to the effect, or possible effect, on the price of horses, if these regulations come into effect, drastically curtailing the export of horses. I do not think it needs a great deal of imagination to suggest that if you prohibit to a large degree the export of anything—any item, whether it is live horses, live cattle or anything else—the market at home is bound to be depressed.

Again, I think it is a safe assumption that the farmers will not, in future, receive as much for their horses for export as they have received up to now. One of the difficulties of the factories operating in this country has been to procure horses at an economic figure. That figure is something like half the price which the farmers have been getting for what one might call well-fleshed animals suitable for export to the Continent for slaughter. It may be that this new concern will find a market which has not up to now been available to the existing factories but, if so, it has been kept a very carefully guarded secret.

However, there is a third point with which I am more vitally concerned. One of the factories established to enter into this trade was established near the city of Limerick. At the time, there was a good deal of publicity associated with the granting of the licence, and estimates of the possible employment were made which proved, in the event, to be substantially inaccurate and far too optimistic. Quite an amount of employment has been given directly to the butchers and packers and indirectly to the processing companies through the Limerick factory. As Limerick has not been favoured with the establishment of industries to any degree in recent years—I think two small factories have been established in three years—anything that would threaten the extinction of an existing industry is a matter of serious concern to the people of Limerick.

By and large, I think the Minister, before taking unto himself these powers to regulate and restrict the export of horses, should at least have given the existing factories an opportunity of consultation with regard to the various factors involved. I think also that the farming community have some right to be consulted with regard to the possible effect of these proposals. It is quite possible that my fears in this regard are groundless, but, based on the available supply of horses are the general needs and the capacity of the existing factories. As I say, I may be quite wrong, but it seems to me that the two existing small factories will be placed in jeopardy by this new and apparently very substantial undertaking.

I should like to support the point of view put forward by Deputy Russell. It is a very sudden decision and, in the words of the Sunday Independent last Sunday, it seems to be a mystery affecting to a very great extent the horse trade in general. It appears to be a decision which was taken behind backs. No one seemed to get any notice of it until we read a few lines in the newspapers before last weekend, and yet we find an order made today, making certain regulations and creating a complete change in the horse trade as we have known it. Horse fairs in the past have been famous in this country. A large number of people are dealing with horses in one way or another. The Government consulted commercial interests engaged in the production and distribution of horse flesh without even discussing this matter or consulting the people already engaged in this business.

The Minister has, I believe, made a very bad move. The factories which have been set up and licensed are capable of dealing with the remaining horses in this country, and I mention the remaining horses because the number of work horses becoming available for export and slaughter is dwindling. The horse is being replaced by the tractor and the result is that farmers are not rearing foals of the Irish draught-horse or work-horse type in the rural areas. It is not economic for them to rear a horse unless they can use that horse in connection with farming activities.

Therefore, I cannot see a bright prospect for any factory being set up here with the idea of a large number of horses being available regularly for the production of horse meat. In the course of his reply to day, the Minister said that the slaughtering capacity of the existing factories was 250 horses per week, which represents about 12,000 horses a year. Does the Minister seriously think that when the existing factories have disposed of 12,000 horses a year the people concerned in this new factory with whom he has had discussions will have a substantial supply of horses available to them?

According to the Minister's Order, a licence must be issued in respect of each horse to be exported. He has interfered in this Order with the delivery of these horses on the other side. Generally speaking, horses exported from here are landed at three places, Amsterdam, Antwerp and Dieppe. The Minister says in this Order that the horses must be slaugtered within 30 miles of the port of embarkation. When horses are landed at Amsterdam they have to travel more than 30 miles to be slaughtered. The horses landed at Dieppe have to be travelled as far as Paris which is much more than 30 miles from the port of embarkation. In other words, the Minister has decided to interfere with an export trade which was landing horses in good condition at Amsterdam, Antwerp and Dieppe. Antwerp is now the only place which will qualify under the Minister's Order.

It is obvious that the Minister has decided to put an end to the export of live horses for horse meat production but earlier this year, as Deputy Russell mentioned already, he put the ship-owners and the factory owners to considerable expense in complying with regulations which he made to ensure that horses would be very comfortably transported. Having made those regulations, he makes an Order now which virtually puts an end to the export of work horses.

The Minister also stipulates in the Order that only in special circumstances will a horse aged over seven years be allowed to be exported. The Minister knows very well that the working capacity of an ordinary farm horse lasts up to the age of ten years, up to which period he is sturdy and in good health. He knows very well that any farmer who has a horse aged seven years has a horse in its prime. He has barely got the horse started into useful work on his farm but now the Minister proposes to insist on the animal being slaughtered here instead of permitting it to be exported.

Very careful regulations have already been made regarding the physical condition of horses before they are exported. No disabled horse may be exported. It must be a healthy horse, capable of working and fit to travel. In spite of these regulations made within the past 12 months, the Minister has made an Order which follows the lines of the British Act of 1937. In 1937 in Great Britain regulations of this kind were made but the position in Great Britain differed very much from the position here. Nevertheless the Minister is following almost to the letter the British Act of 1937 relating to the export of horses.

I would ask the Minister to mend his hand if possible. It is wrong to give what will be a virtual monopoly because in the long run it is the people who will have the horse to sell who must suffer, apart from those who derive a living in the normal way from the sale of horses from one farmer to another and for different purposes.

Would the Minister allow me to say a few brief words?

I cannot allow anybody other than the Minister to speak now, unless the Minister gives way.

I just look on the Order as an extermination order for our horse trade. If we do away with 12,500 horses every year what will be the position in the event of a war? Is the Minister going to depend on dieselisation? When he puts all his eggs in one basket where will the country be?

I find it hard to understand the attitude of Deputies who have addressed themselves to this matter. If my memory is correct when the Order permitting the export of horse flesh was first made in 1957 it was the intention and the hope that our export trade in live horses would disappear and that in its place we would have what is now not only aimed at but appears to be within our reach. When that Order was made in 1957 the announcement provided as follows:

Any person will be permitted to engage in the trade subject to compliance with conditions to be determined by the Minister for Agriculture.

Any person will be permitted to engage in the trade provided his premises comply with the regulations and standards set up by the veterinary people of my Department. It was, in fact, a source of disappointment to some Deputies on the opposite side—I do not know whether it really was a source of disappointment to them but they so expressed themselves—that this dead meat trade in horse flesh had not developed. They "skitted" the Minister for Agriculture and the Government because as they said there was no appearance of this trade developing notwithstanding the announcement I have mentioned regarding the decision of the Government at the time.

I am sure Deputy Russell is aware that in accordance with that announcement I could not prevent, if I tried, or if I wanted to, a concern from coming in here as this concern proposes. Subject to these conditions I have not the right to prevent them. The question of the capacity of the two existing concerns does not arise and could not influence me in that respect. If you take the capacity of our meat factories that capacity is far more than adequate.

That is a bad example.

It is far more than adequate, yet the factories are there. I remember, when acting for a former Minister for Agriculture, meeting a deputation from the Deputy's own constituency regarding the establishment of a factory that has since developed. I tried to persuade them not to go ahead because I thought at the time—I may have been wrong— that it was not a wise decision or a wise investment, but even after I had tried to persuade them not to go ahead I said: "Look here, having said all this, the decision is yours. If you provide premises that satisfy the requirements of our veterinary people, I cannot stop you."

The same applies in this case but apart altogether from that aspect of this matter I am pleased to see this firm coming in here. I am pleased for the reason that I gave at Question Time. They are the best known people in Britain dealing with horse flesh. They have contacts with the European trade and they have an organisation which it is not easy to come by. Now, from the point of view of the effect that the Order I have made will have on prices, horses will, under licence, be exported from this country subject to the condition mentioned by Deputies. The stipulation as to the place of slaughter after arrival was deliberately decided by me and, I would say, wisely decided.

Deputy Coogan mentioned the fact that we were going to slaughter all these horses. That number of horses is leaving the country now anyhow and the question arises is it better policy that they should be slaughtered here and develop this trade than to let them out of the country in the traditional way with all the hazards?

The Minister said "develop"?

The Deputy mentioned the figure which was to have the effect of leaving us without horses in a short time. If horses are leaving in the numbers mentioned by the Deputy will it not have the same effect if the horses are slaughtered here? As the Taoiseach said 12 months ago, and I am sure it was stated by other public men even before that, this was the sort of development which we would like to see taking place. We selected the age of the animals as seven years because it is possible to know the age of horses up to seven but not after that. The very fact that horses under seven years can be exported under licence has, and will continue to have, an effect upon the price these concerns will pay for older animals for slaughter here. I think that too is a useful provision because, while I could not say, and in fact nobody could say, what effect the making of that Order will have on the price of horses here, I was certainly anxious, while providing for the slaughter of horses in Ireland and building a trade with Britain and the Continent for horse flesh through the activities of reputable concerns, as best I could to protect the price structure as it is. To some extent the fact that horses up to seven years can be exported will ensure that.

I am quite satisfied that first of all I could not have prevented this concern coming in here. They first made an approach to our representatives in London and afterwards they discussed these matters with my Department. Finally, we agreed on this plan. As I say, as far as I am concerned I welcome them and I could not have stopped them. They are very welcome because I believe that a firm like the firm I have mentioned is vital so far as the development of this trade on a proper basis is concerned.

I do not see why it should have the effect that Deputy Russell appears to fear. I do not see why this organisation should not be capable of handling the horse flesh provided through these two concerns which I named. Indeed, I think at present some of the business is being done with the firm the name of which I gave at Question Time today. I am satisfied that it is a very desirable thing for this trade and I do not foresee any of the unfavourable consequences some Deputies fear.

The Dáil adjourned at 5.30 p.m. until 3 p.m. on Wednesday, 30th November, 1960.

Barr
Roinn